I don't like Toy Story 4 either but do you really need six hours to trash it?
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Holy shit
I don't like Toy Story 4 either but do you really need six hours to trash it?
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
how will these people feel when they grow older and realize they wasted their lives on ridiculously long video essays about random show/movies
>6 hours
who this, MauLer?
picrel
How much time have you wasted on here, anon?
A handful of minutes per day. I usually browse this site while I'm preparing lunch.
What a loser.
To be honest the people who listen to them all day are probably in rougher shape than the people who make them.
The same way you will feel realizing you wasted your best years on a cantonese basket-weaving website
>make massive 6 hour video that's constantly in the recommendations feed
>put half an hour's worth of adverts and sponsers into the video to milk it
>become rich
I'm sure they're feeling fine.
The essayists are not the losers here. Getting paid to write and talk about things you're personally deeply invested in is way more fulfilling than working a wagie job in a field you barely give a shit about.
He is at most making a quarter of minimum wage with his upload rate and how fricking long it must take to make these videos.
Still, he's talking about things he cares a lot about. And him not receiving much profit either way would make it easier to move on to more serious niche things as he grows older.
Any video that gets close to 2 hours is always because the creator is an autistic moron that repeats himself over and over again, goes on huge tangents or takes 10 minutes to say something that could be perfectly explained in a paragraph. The only exception I've seen is a guy trying to do a gloss over TW:WH2 and giving each faction a 5 minute blurb ballooned the video like crazy.
>repeats himself over and over again,
I see complains like this about long videos all the time and at this point I'm just convinced it's a strawman. I almost never see this, and when I do, it's in videos that aren't longer than 30 minutes. The type of person to regurgitate their thoughts to pad out their writing is usually not capable of making a long structured essay, to begin with.
>goes on huge tangents or takes 10 minutes to say something that could be perfectly explained in a paragraph.
Tangents allow you to give more detail.
Cope
>This 6 hour rant was better than Toy Story 4
Kek
Only of their video aren't popular
tldw: Plot and character motivations don't make sense.
>Bonnie was still shown playing with Woody during the montage where Forky was trying to kill himself, so Woody was just being a little b***h about not being the favorite again.
>Forky breaks the universe since anyone can just give sentience to any random object.
>Buzz was flanderized to be a moron.
>Bo's character was retconned to be someone else she's not.
>Bonnie being fickle is not a defense because it goes both ways, as seen in the movie itself. There are times when she doesn't play with Woody and times when she does.
forgot to add
>Woody falling in love with Bo again makes no sense since all Bo does after they reunite was demean and belittle him, even when he's not at fault.
>old supporting characters are basically just cameos
>new supporting characters suck
>the villain gets a slap on the wrist
>breaks the universe
TS4 is shit, but who gives a frick about this? Do the rules of the universe really matter when it's a kids movie about talking toys? Oh no, think of the implications! Besides, Forky wasn't just any random object - it was something Bonnie created with love, adding pieces like a face and limbs and then played with it, giving it life as a toy. Seems perfectly within reason to me
>it's a kids thing so it's fine if it's shit
Do you ever get tired of posting this every day?
Sure, but many toys are animated and given sentience under circumstances where love is not involved. Factory default Buzz and Zurg for example. You're point would be great if it actually worked that way and a kid playing with toys is what first gives them life. But then Toy Story 2 doesn't work.
>Bonnie was still shown playing with Woody during the montage where Forky was trying to kill himself, so Woody was just being a little b***h about not being the favorite again.
Yeah this one was pretty bad. It's bullshit to follow up a movie about Woody learning to move on from Andy to Bonnie, to then immediately have him learn to move on from Bonnie even though its only been like what, a few years at most? Awful decision regardless.
>Forky breaks the universe since anyone can just give sentience to any random object.
This is kinda dumb since thats how it is in the toy story universe anyway. All toys are made in factories meaning random factory workers give sentience to objects all the time every day. Forky is actually one of the better ideas they explored in TS4 as kids do sometimes make their own toys, and just because they weren't bought in a store doesn't mean they don't count as toys.
>Buzz was flanderized to be a moron.
Agreed. He was really stupid this movie. But the idea of Buzz thinking his voice lines are his "conscious" is actually a good idea... if it was toy story 1 Buzz. By the second movie he was far too self aware to be doing stuff like that. The idea could work as a short set in between the first and second movies maybe.
>Bo's character was retconned to be someone else she's not.
I guess, but she was never a very prominent character beforehand and some of it can be chalked up to years out on her own changing her personality.
being fickle is not a defense because it goes both ways, as seen in the movie itself. There are times when she doesn't play with Woody and times when she does.
Yeah that's true but it's pretty much just the first point again.
>I guess, but she was never a very prominent character beforehand and some of it can be chalked up to years out on her own changing her personality.
This is actually something he brings up. His problem isn't that Bo is a different person, it's that she's shown as hyper competent in the flashback as well despite being just a nice and supportive gal in the first two.
?t=469
>All those timestamps
Good fricking lord.
I mean, they show that for everyone. Everyone is acting together like they have to save toys from storm drains all the time like some kind of action heroes. That was more of an inconsistency with how the past in general was presented rather that Bo specifically. Unless after Toy Story 2 those kinds of operations we are just to assume became the norm for them.
I never watched TS4.
Yes. Toy Story 4 is a fricking travesty and a blemish on a completed trilogy. Possibly the only complete animated trilogy that kept it's quality up. It's nothing but a cashgrab and retcons Bo into a different character and her and Woody's relationship into something it never was. It genuinely turned me off Pixar altogether and I've barely watched any major cgi animation since.
Same. I think TS4 was the last movie I saw in theaters.
And this was the result of cancelling Lasseter.
Thanks Kathleen Kennedy
White man been here.
No, 6 hours isn't enough half the amount of time you actually need.
You mean to tell me MauLer isn't the only moron making video essays longer than the actual movie?
He's also done videos trashing Lightyear, Incredibles 2, and the Cars TV show of all things
Eh you know an hour and 20 minutes is a fair amount to criticize a movie, really long maybe but at least it's reas-
>He made 3 FRICKING VIDEO'S THAT ARE ALL OVER AN HOUR LONG FOR THE INCREDIBLES
How can one man be so autistic, is it really necessary to scrounge this badly for views?
This motherfricker is hysterical. An uber autist.
in the second Incredibles 2 video, he autistically fails to realize that Jack Jack is attacking the raccoon because he looks like the thug he's seeing on TV. Even a fricking baby would have realized such simple parallel.
>but do you really need six hours to trash it?
Yes, the default position is to defend goyslop. The talking points to defend each are pre-prepared even before release and still get parroted.
I can't imagine actually watching, let alone getting anything out of something this long. But
Makes a good point. If you're not absolutely thurough you're just inviting drones to tell you you didn't watch or understand the movie. There's already established points of contention you have to make your way through, you can't just start from scratch or focus on just the points you think matter. You pretty much have to treat everything as part of a continuous discussion on the internet now if you want people to take you seriously.
This guy's schizophrenic editing impresses me. He has a reaction shot of a random character to match every single thing he's saying.
Also worth mentioning that this guy has a Sonic Adventure 2 playthrough where it looks like he's never played a video game in his entire life.
I think the most autistic review I've seen is some British dude making a breakdown of another British dudes Dark Souls 2 review. I think it was 12 hours or something.
There’s a fallout one that’s the same
Brevity is the soul of wit.
tbh Toy Story 4 is on the same level of Toy Story 3, maybe even a little better, but it has the worst ending in the series
And the worst opening
And the worst use of Buzz
And the worst use of Jesse
And the worst use of the others toys
And the worst villain(the bar was already low)
Unironically I can't think about anything that was better than 3 .
Thank god that in KH4 or 5 we will play Toy story 2 instead 4 .
My idea to fix Toy Story 4 is the antique shop should also have been pottery/art studio. Gabby Gabby could stay an antagonist, but her villainous nature would be due to a cool looking dog-sized sculpture (like a lion or wolf whatever, something that could be cool and menacing).
The sculpture hates that they are on the floor at the front of the shop where kids come in and touch them and try to ride him. And is the leader of the other living antiquities (the ones children play with), being kind and like family to Gabby, but obviously viewing her as inferior due to "just being a toy" not a valuable piece of art like he is. Its clear he's put this idea that she'll never be bought because she's broken without a voice box into her head. This would make Gabby far more sympathetic and give the movie a interesting villain in a contrast with Forky.
Then you could have the sculpture villain get his comeuppance at the end of the film by being impaled with a large spring, and we see the owners the next day recycle him into a park rocker.
(Though there are many other things to fix with this film that just the villain)
Here's how you fix Toy Story 4: Don't make it. Save yourself from one of the most pointless sequels of all time
I'd even say Toy Story could even end at 2 and I'd be satisfied, but I'm fine with 3's existence I guess
There are people who have taken complaining and turned it into an art form
The Mauler, for instance, is currently doing a dissection of 'The Force awakens' which so far has taken eleven hours
This guy is kino
His LEGO Indiana Jones how to videos are Kino.
Yes, TS4 is that awful
All e-celebs are idiotic, vapid attention prostitutes akin to tripgays and serial shitposting schizos. No exceptions.
All e-celeb gossippers and worshippers like the OP are intellectually regressive troglodytes who are completely incapable of formulating their own opinions about anything and whose lives are so pathetically empty that they need to fill the void by obsessing over someone they've never even met. Therefore, they're absolutely no different from the hordes of drooling, braindead normalgays who gawk at the latest supermarket tabloid. No exceptions.
All e-celeb threads are cancer that must be reported as soon as possible and as much as possible for violating Global Rule 11 and for being off topic. No exceptions.
If an e-celeb thread were to be posted on Cinemaphile, it would either be shitposted to oblivion or deleted in a matter of minutes, if not seconds.
Each and every single one of you goddamn moronic subhumans should be absolutely fricking ashamed of yourselves for knowingly reducing this board's quality.
He gets more pussy than you. COPE.
To be fair to those autists, imagine it as a written article. Suddenly its not so autistic anymore.
The guy is an asspie, he alzo refuses to swear and instead goes all FAKESWEARING! because MUH QUIRKY AND MOMMY SUSSIE!
Sad thing tough, most of what he says is true, but you know, bad messanger.
Someone else already did the same but better in like 1/3rd of the time.
For what for?
Even the AI generated summary is long as frick
https://www.summarize.tech/m.youtube.com/watch?v=U__oaZ9FiXM
Kill e-celeb thread posters. Behead e-celeb thread posters. Roundhouse kick an e-celeb thread poster into the concrete. Slam dunk an e-celeb thread poster into the trashcan. Crucify filthy e-celeb thread posters. Defecate in an e-celeb thread poster's food. Launch e-celeb thread posters into the sun. Stir fry e-celeb thread posters in a wok. Toss e-celeb thread posters into active volcanoes. Urinate into an e-celeb thread poster's gas tank. Judo throw e-celeb thread posters into a wood chipper. Twist e-celeb thread posters heads off. Report e-celeb thread posters to the IRS. Karate chop e-celeb thread posters in half. Curb stomp e-celeb thread posters. Trap e-celeb thread posters in quicksand. Crush e-celeb thread posters in the trash compactor. Liquefy e-celeb thread posters in a vat of acid. Eat e-celeb thread posters. Dissect e-celeb thread posters. Exterminate e-celeb thread posters in the gas chamber. Stomp e-celeb thread poster's skulls with steel toed boots. Cremate e-celeb thread posters in the oven. Lobotomize e-celeb thread posters. Mandatory abortions for e-celeb thread posters. Grind e-celeb thread posters in the garbage disposal. Drown e-celeb thread posters in fried chicken grease. Vaporize e-celeb thread posters with a ray gun. Kick e-celeb thread posters down the stairs. Feed e-celeb thread posters to alligators. Slice e-celeb thread posters with a katana.