how am i supposed to root for the protagonist with a villain this based?

how am i supposed to root for the protagonist with a villain this based?

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I don't think there was ever a time in that show where I rooted for the protagonist.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I rooted for her to bloodbend my penis.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      So you rooted for Unalaq and post-concentration camp reveal Kuvira?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        No, I just fell asleep.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Please he was a second attempt at amon equalist movement but even more moronic. Cause as we see it didn't make things better.

        Unalaq was bad cause he never had a compelling reason of why he wanted to be a Dark Avatar other than "muh tradition" vague bullshit, we don't even know the purpose of red lotus and it gave us one of the worse retcons of origin of bending and avatar.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Everything about Unalaq was dumb and book 2 is but the concentration camp Kuvira thing always felt like it was tacked on or ADRed in because they needed a reason to confirm her as being evil.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          the problem with Kuvira is that they tried to make a layered villain but only showed all the good she had done up until that point. All we had to go off of were just vague statements like "I know what happens to villages who refuse your leadership" without being shown anything. So even if Kuvira was off-screen murdering babies or some shit, it wouldn't register with the audience because THEY DON'T FRICKING SHOW IT

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      i loved it how they just swept the issue of power disparity between benders and non-benders under the rug because "they're just terrorists lol, don't think about it", and because they have an obamaesque non-bender president now

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the show literally showed how anarchism leads to authoritarianism. Even he knew he fricked up after hearing about Kuvira from Korra.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Kuvira only took power because Korra stopped him.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Zaheer's an anarchist, he wasn't going to seize control the Earth Kingdom. He was going to kill the Avatar, all of the monarchs and councilmen, and stand on top of some mountain with his chest out expecting the world to be grateful. By the time he fricked off to kill the Fire Lady and came back to the Earth Kingdom, Kuvira's mech would be waiting for him.

        Hell, if Kuvira didn't overthrow him, Varrick would and no one wants to live in that world.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It's not like Zaheer would lie down and sleep for the rest of his life after killing the queen. He only did nothing because they locked him in jail. The Red Lotus would have done something the moment they heard about some military group trying to unify the Earth Kingdom again.
          Kuvira only got to spirit powered giant mechs because she had a whole year of unrestricted military authority on the world largest country. Hell, the other nations even supported her.

          If anything, Kuvira happening only proved that Zaheer was right.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The moment Zaheer left the Earth Kingdom, an authoritarian regime would rise from the power vacuum. Not to mention that every other monarch would be ready for him, unlike the Earth Queen. Sure, there are other Red Lotus members, but the fact that they did nothing while Kuvira rose to power showed that Ghazan, P'Li, Ming-Hua, and Zaheer were the best they had.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Several regimes actually, some more authoritarian than others. That's exactly what happened, the Earth Kingdom was split into several warring regions, that's why Kuvira spent a whole year waging an unification war. She didn't took power overnight, the goal of the Red Lotus would be to prevent any of those factions to become the giant state that the Earth Kingdom was.
              Ghazan, P'Li, Ming-Hua, and Zaheer were the best they had because they were the only members, of course the organization would grow with time. They did nothing about Kuvira cuz they were either dead or in jail.

              Kuvira only happened because all other nations supported her unification campaign and allowed her to do whatever she please for a whole year.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You think those four were the only members of the Red Lotus? That's not an organization, that's a club. There were and still are many more members of the Red Lotus, they're just jobbers.

                Even if they did stop Kuvira, it would never cease. They'd be stomping out fires all over the kingdom while the other nations see this and become more authoritarian because The Red Lotus just became their boogeyman. I promise you the Fire Nation is ready to boot up the old war machine and this time be seen as justified.

                >Old centralized power was a decadent and corrupt monarchy that oppressed the people
                >New centralized power is a corrupt military dictatorship that oppressed the people

                It's almost like, I dunno... centralized power is a bad idea.

                centralized power will always form so long as you sell people on the idea of safety and security under their rule.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                They were only member. The Red Lotus had been destroyed long ago, they were the only surviving members.
                Yeah, it would be an endless job, it's kind of acknowledged in the anarchism ideology that the price of freedom would be constant surveillance.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >They were only member. The Red Lotus had been destroyed long ago, they were the only surviving members.
                Then who are these guys?

                And an endless job with just four people is just prolonging a time of chaos that could never last. They're shit at recruiting and once a could of half-decent benders or an army marches up to them, they're done and the world will move on without them

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Old centralized power was a decadent and corrupt monarchy that oppressed the people
              >New centralized power is a corrupt military dictatorship that oppressed the people

              It's almost like, I dunno... centralized power is a bad idea.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >It's not like Zaheer would lie down and sleep for the rest of his life after killing the queen.
            I think that's the death knell in Zaheer's philosophy. Some people just want to be safe and secure so there is always going to be a leader to replace the next one. Most anarchists do not support assassinations so its unfortunate a huge ideology got simplified.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Anarchism is not about lack of leadership. You can still follow leaders voluntary, the problem is when you're forced to follow under the threat of death.

              They don't go this deep into the ideology due to kids show, but I guess the end goal of the Red Lotus wouldn't be a world without leaders, but a world without governments. The nations would break down in multiple autonomous regions and the Red Lotus would intervene every time one of those regions became too oppressive.
              Of course this logic is still flawed since the Red Lotus would eventually just become the new centralized power. Even if Zaheer had unbreakable will and only did the right thing, he would eventually die and one day someone would take over the Red Lotus and become an oppressive ruler.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Varrick would and no one wants to live in that world.

          Varrick was actually a good guy though, he was trying to invent batteries to power civilization and kuvira forced him to weaponize it. He did objectively more good for the other characters than bad

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Only wrong thing he did wrong was kill the earth queen and not leave her barely alive

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    By realizing that his anarchistic ideals would just lead to a power gap, which will then be filled by another authoritarian regime.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    He says that but I can't even recall for the earth emperors could do bending

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Nothing after the first season made sense

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >make villain
    >villain has entirely reasonable points
    >but because they're too 'radical' the villain must be put down by the protagonist without a second though

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Would you have rooted for that protagonist if the villain was as bad as her?

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Was there anything beyond “ANARCHY RULES!” to his character?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Airbender larping and gay poetry

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *