On the Moon (the real, literal Moon), the lunar rover had a camera attached which could be operated by the ground control. That camera was used to observe takeoff from the Moon.
>NASA admits this by saying they are planning on having their FIRST rover on the moon by 2023
I mean true but I think these days Rover is an autonomous vehicle with no human involvement. So you're disingenuous.
Plus, the Wikipedia makes it very confusing in saying it landed on a celestial body as opposed to just saying the moon
Decommissioned shorty after
2 years ago
Anonymous
are you black by any chance?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Nah, but I hate whites just as much as you hate non whites
2 years ago
Anonymous
A conspiracy theorist and a israelite?
Wow.
2 years ago
Anonymous
its always baffling how shitskins can think they're superior to anyone else.
2 years ago
Anonymous
so you're non-white
got it
2 years ago
Anonymous
What are you? Fourth generation American?
Do you have any land to your family's name?
My family has several, in Palm Springs, Nevada, and Minnesota
You most likely have ZERO
2 years ago
Anonymous
My family owns jack shit but I own land in Palm Springs, Nevada, Minnesota AND I recently bought the entire Grand Canyon.
Problem, poorgay?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yeah, that's what I thought
YOU being white is so great that you've become complacent while non whites work their way to the front
And when you see that happen, you start complaining "white genocide!" in the comfort of your raggedy gamer chair as you continue to sip your Mountain Dew while playing cod
Lol get bent
2 years ago
Anonymous
I took a shit in your 'grand' canyon, and you'll never find it. Think about that every time that you visit, that rather than communing with the beauty of nature, you are in reality haunted by the phantom of my doody
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm not even American lol
I was lying about owning property in the US as a jape.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Imagine being white and not owning a single strip of land
Lol
You failed as a species, in particular, a white species
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm Saskatchewan, and I transfer my poopy curse to whatever local landmark you hold dear
How was there no delayed control of the camera tilt, with 60’s tech? I would honestly believe they tied fishing line to the base of the launched pod connected to the arm of a well oiled tripod and just sort of math’d it like boy scouts more than they had a telecommicable control in real-time alllllll those miles away
because it was a non-issue for the apollo missions.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Meaning the technology was actually ancient enough to not be bothered by it?
2 years ago
Anonymous
yep. the apollo computer was 70lbs of metal and about as powerful as a dollar store calculator.
2 years ago
Anonymous
it’s capabilities are irrelevant. Were the ship, and the camera equipment for that matter, comprised of components that still worked as a computer but *not* be scrambled by radiation that scrambles our modern computers?
2 years ago
Anonymous
yes, old analog technology was much bigger than current technology, and not susceptible to gamma rays.
the capability of the apollo computer was stated to give a frame of reference to how much actual circuitry was present in 70lbs of metal. your phone has several million times as much circuitry.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yes, you fricking moron. How could you know about the van Allen belt and not know that? No wonder you're a fricking moon landing denier.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Imagine what Nasa could do with a 3090 ti, which unfortunetaly they cannot afford, even after the crypto crash...
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Radiation is a nonissue
2 years ago
Anonymous
yep, they only spent a short amount of time in the belt.
chernobyl was bad because people were being exposed to high levels of radiation for hours/days on end.
2 years ago
Anonymous
They never went through the belt, anon
2 years ago
Anonymous
yea, they did. they also landed on the moon. also god isn't real and the bible is mostly bullshit.
2 years ago
Anonymous
It's called a belt and not a ball because it's weaker at the poles. Hence, rockets headed to deep space take a trajectory through the weakest part and end up fine. I'd provide a picture but you could google it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
anon hundreds of people work in chernobyl every single day. whether it was making the steel casing for the chamber that exploded or managing the other active nuclear reactors
>they are regularly flying geostationary satellites, far beyond the radiation belts
because they don't need to be active while passing through the van allen belt.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>satellites don't have electronics
2 years ago
Anonymous
>i don't understand why radiation is bad for microcircuitry
>I'm dumb as frick! >therefore the moon landing was fake!
Every single moon landing denyer ever lol. Dunno why you morons get such joy from being called moronic.
How was there no delayed control of the camera tilt, with 60’s tech? I would honestly believe they tied fishing line to the base of the launched pod connected to the arm of a well oiled tripod and just sort of math’d it like boy scouts more than they had a telecommicable control in real-time alllllll those miles away
>operated by the ground control
i'm pretty sure it was automated the mission was planned through down to the second
there really isn't much of a delay to the moon maybe a couple of seconds
Ignoring the fact that there's meant to be a camera man to get this shot, theres also no flame from any engine thrust at all it just ascends up by itself, maybe the pyrotechnics failed?
You're a complete tool if you think this shit is real.
you're probably trolling but the camera was controlled with a 1-3 second radio delay and thrusters in space don't exhaust fire in the same way they do in-atmosphere
you're probably trolling but the camera was controlled with a 1-3 second radio delay and thrusters in space don't exhaust fire in the same way they do in-atmosphere
Absolute brainlets, you see the thruster thrusting for one second and then it turns off because it's enough to keep it going.
Imagine being this fricking stupid. There is a fricking UNMANNED rover on Mars tight now, testing soil and sending back HD images earth. God conspiracy theoriest are lowest form of scum. I hate you dumb fricking c**ts.
NASA has the public believing their satellite dish is strong enough to beam and receive live recordings from a small satellite dish that's attached to a rover 238,900 miles in space
Lol
Also, NASA never had a rover on the moon and yet so many people think there were several
Can't believe that the rest of the world fell for this fricking mutt lie and decided muttmerica was superior to the USSR. We could be living under based communism instead of muttism.
I hate israelites but he probably will say something about israelites wanting people to think the moon is real or some crazy schizo shit. Flat earthers make the rest of us look bad
couldnt that background literally just be a mountain range thats hundreds of miles away?
some gay living near the himalayas should take some photos of it on the same street but like with the floor being clearly different but the himalayas in the background being the exact same. because surprise surprise, big mountains forever away dont look all that different when youre that far away and a few hundred metres apart
Yeah right, and for some strange reason NASA destroyed all the technology related to the moon landing and has been building it all back from scratch since 1969
99% of the engineers who worked on the Apollo program are already dead of old age and the tooling was destroyed because it was economically unfeasible to store them for so long. Plus there were concerns that spies from countries such as North Korea could steal rocket tech from NASA and use it on their ballistic missile programs. It's the same reason all the tooling and schematics for the F-14 were destroyed.
and there are people who actually want to live there? sounds like a life not much worth living if you can't see the stars
or can you still see them when you look directly up?
you could see it IRL dumb dumb, it's just that the camera doesn't pick it up becase dunes bright stars dim
try photographing the night sky with a streetlight in the frame
apparently you could kind of see them if you stood in the shadow of the lunar module and looked up at the sky, the glare was much reduced that way.
Also, the most spectacular night sky ever seen was on the Apollo 8 orbit of the dark side of the moon. The lack of sunlight meant that crew was basically basking in the unfiltered light of the cosmos and could see all the stars without any atmospheric distortion or glare from the sun, it must have been astonishing to see.
0:29 in: >a guy wearing a 176lb suit and helmet falls over and then lifts himself airborne by extending his legs at the knees >this was totally done in 1G
you got the one where the spacecraft is hovering over the moon right before it lands and you can see the steel wires holding it up then it tilts at the last second
>source: the bible
yea that's self-own, mah homie. god isn't real.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Sorry, but I can't hear you over the sound of you eating shit, try again.
2 years ago
Anonymous
holocaust denial is a real crime
2 years ago
Anonymous
>4 letters are the same >literally a different script
yeah hello means poop in some other languages and if you write how their pronounced in english it'll look similar do you think some people are actually going around saying "poop" to eachother? Fricken dumbass
But of course. Americans are unable to accept that they arent the greatest in everything. Vide first plane is from Santos Dumont but they wont accept it.
What are you talking about? Once you’re cruising you’re cruising.
2 years ago
Anonymous
11 days to cover 238,900 miles
They weren't exactly cruising
2 years ago
Anonymous
You are gonna shit yourself when you find out what a vacuum is.
Is the belt the reason why we don’t have moon colony? And if there’s a secret moon colony, are they only able to live on 1960’s tech?
No. It's lack of interest and funding. Commercial space flight and the promise of cheap reusable rockets is the main reason we are seeing a new space race right now.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>lack of interest
Lol
That's why people have been talking about space nonstop ever since we faked it back on 1969, huh?
>lack of funding
Again, lol
Trump greenlit NASA to go back to the moon back in 2016 and NASA said "uhh sure" but then canceled their arrangement when trump put the pressure on
You keep defending NASA but everything they do always comes up short or is a no go
2 years ago
Anonymous
moron
2 years ago
Anonymous
2 years ago
Anonymous
holy shit did he just hook that dude's pocket with his pinky??
2 years ago
Anonymous
I think it's a belt loop hole
2 years ago
Anonymous
WTF???? I'M GOING INSANEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE HAAAAAAAA
2 years ago
Anonymous
You're right. Space agencies specifically leave bits and pieces of the TRUTH for god fearing righteous truth-seekers to know what's really going on. He didn't just accidentally yoink his pocket or anything after the guy did a full summersault. You're truly the next generation of big thinkers. Please pat yourself on the back
2 years ago
Anonymous
am I supposed to be seeing something here
????????????
2 years ago
Anonymous
the guy on the bottom right grab's bottom left's pocket or belt loop and the moron posting it is implying it's a string even though he did a full summersault
2 years ago
Anonymous
If it is a string how do they fake their fricked up faces from 0G?
2 years ago
Anonymous
they took drugs to increase their blood pressure
2 years ago
Anonymous
they're clearly drunk
2 years ago
Anonymous
Poor Marines. Their soul purpose is to take care of other morons and all with a smile on their faces
2 years ago
Anonymous
>That's why people have been talking about space nonstop ever since we faked it back on 1969, huh?
Talking about something doesn't equal action. >Again, lol
I'm not saying they don't get funded, I'm saying they need an ungodly amount of money to do it to the point where it's unfeasible to fund a moon base. But recently costs are going down, or at least projected to. So things are picking up again.
Also, NASA ARE shit. I agree. They are a money sink who waste all their money on overpaid contracts instead of actual meaningful in house work, like the US army.
2 years ago
Anonymous
no you don't get it. Moon close! I can see it in sky! That mean moon easy. Moon isn't moving around 30 earths away, NASA big israelite lie
2 years ago
Anonymous
Trump gave NASA all the amount of money they ever wanted for the trip.
That's what greenlighting it means.
It means, here's all the money, take it, it's yours. Now go to the moon
But of course, people will still argue that money was, and still is, the issue
2 years ago
Anonymous
schizo spacing
2 years ago
Anonymous
And they are using that very same money to try and go to the moon with the ultimate aim of a moon base, called they Artemis program.
If my memory serves they are launching the first crewed moon mission in a few weeks.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yeah we'll see how that pans out
Lol
Another moon landing and no promotion or coverage about it at all
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yeah we'll see how that pans out
Lol
Another moon landing and no promotion or coverage about it at all
Sorry. Meant to say unmanned. Manned isn't planned until 2024.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>no people will be sent to the moon, but maybe NEXT time!
Imagine my shock!
2 years ago
Anonymous
this will be a long one
NASA learned that congress or president could cancel their plan with a single stroke of a pen
which is what Nixon did in order to have money for Vietnam war
in a stroke of administrative genius, NASA spread Shuttle manufacturing all over the 50 states, so every congressman had a vested interest in keeping the jobs around and also funded the companies to keep the light on, just in case
that meant the costs of everything went up 10-100 times over the years
fast forward and 14 dead astronauts later, shuttle was cancelled, provided that ALL the companies will stay around
therefore, NASA spent the last 15 years trying to cobble Saturn V from parts made specifically for a Space Shuttle, which is going about as well as if you were ordered to build a helicopter from from Chevrolet C10
2 years ago
Anonymous
Why not? 900mph isn’t crazy. I think you’re confusing the effects of acceleration in a relatively frictionless vacuum with sustained speed
the asteroid belt is between Mars and Jupiter and asteroids are so far apart from one another that they're kind of a non-factor. And no there is not a secret moon colony because there's no real reason to have a secret moon colony.
belts are a barely an issue
that are exaggerated by nasa as an excuse not to do anything besides Mars robot missions, Earth observation, and ISS because they wouldn't have funding to do all these things AND permanent lunar base
you know that are not fully homogeneous zones of radiation, they not only move, shrink and grow & follow the force lines of the earth's electromagnetic field, you can literally fly between them with minimal radiation exposure. Also the van Allan probes back in 2012 found much less radiation than expected in certain areas than expected
the point being, the only way to guarantee radiation doesn't fry microcircuitry is to have zero power running through said microcircuitry. everything else is just winging it.
the belts are a huge issue for manned flight, as you can't just turn off life support, guidance, or communications systems.
1) space capsules are reasonably well shielded
2) electronics for spaceflight are radiation hardened
3) you can just fly above it
4) the radiation there is not constant and you can predict low or high activity
I did answer your question. If you want me to I can go to your house and direct your personal medical assistant to help you look things up. If not you can continue sniffing windows as usual
There are people that unironically believe that this actually happened in the literal moon
LOL LMAO EVEN
The american ego is reaching his brain from his ass
that's sunshield
the entire lunar module was covered in mylar foil to keep the sun from overheating it
also, it only held 0.3 atmosphere
you don't need much to keep 5 psi overpressure
>no light pollution
The landing was done during the day, the sunlight is reflecting off the lunar surface. Any capturing of the stars would completely white out the astronauts and surface.
The votes of people who have 80 IQ and unironically believe that the moon landing was fake matters just as much as a person with an IQ of 150 and a PhD. This needs to be changed before society can prosper.
More pressingly there are places where voting is mandatory, they are forcing people to make decisions on matters they couldn't possibly hope to comprehend.
This is why Australia is able to be so authoritarian, so many people voting with no idea what's really going on
I must say, compulsory voting here in Australia is moronic. I have no idea who thought that was a good idea.
They introduced it in the 30s or some shit because the turnout was so low, their solution was to just make everyone vote even if they didn't want to.
A lot of people still don't vote though. I think I read that 30% of votes cast in the last election were invalid because people just submit empty ballots with nothing written on them.
Let's just assume that it was faked. Why didn't Russia call them out for faking it then? Or China? This is never explained by people who believe ithe moon landing was faked.
China had their first rover on the moon back in 2013. They repeated it again in 2018 with another rover. In late 2020 they also became the third country to retrieve lunar samples.
China was also able to plant their flag on the moon, so if the US flag up there had been faked and didn't actually exist, they would have easily been able to call them out on it.
morons be like "hur dur I'm just asking questions" but ignore every single answer they are given (They are too moronic to understand what is being told to them.).
>Ha ha, these morons who think the moon landings were faked are so clueless! >Oh and by the way, did you know that no mass graves from the holocaust have ever been found?? O-or so I've heard!
They literally did archeological studies where they dug up soil at Treblinka in multiple places and concluded that it contains vast amounts of a mix of human ashes, sand and dirt.
Yeah, I know. I posted a page from the report on one such archeological survey.
maybe when people are literally turned into a handful of dust from incinerators they might be kinda hard to find again?
There are pits meters deep at each of the camps modified for mass scale homicidal gassings containing fragments of human bone, teeth, ash, hair, and fat decomposing into wax. Those in addition to the mass graves of shooting victims from the Einsatzgruppen purges.
Just started watching For all Mankind, why are they showing some hispanics crossing the border while a landing on the moon is taking place?
Will he become a janitor at Nasa?
Is this guy the mexican Werner von Braun?
Jesus Christ I hate these israelites ruining space Kino
they didnt have digital cameras in 1969 that could take stills
all stills had to be developed from old school "positives" or "negatives" on cellulose film
the gif in OP is a stream, but any stills that NASA released to the public from the apollo missions were not developed from film that had gone through the low pressures of the lunar surface
theres no special military grade high altitude film that resists a vacuum, thats magical thinking....the pictures are fake
lander/rover communicated with vessel in orbit around the moon, which communicated with satellites around earth, which communicated with ground facilities.
satellite broadcasts on Earth get relayed from geostationary orbit, delivering much higher (and now digital) video quality
plus the dish on the receiving end is much smaller than those in NASA's DSN
lander/rover communicated with vessel in orbit around the moon, which communicated with satellites around earth, which communicated with ground facilities.
the tv signal from the moon went straight to Earth, but the dishes receiving it on Earth were (and still are) massive
Why is it always so painfully obvious that the people who make this don't even have the most basic understanding of technology?
I'm a big dumb fricking manual laborer and even I can figure this stuff out.
Being a conspiracy theorist is stupid. You're never ever gonna get proven right, and even if you are, nothing will come of it. The swamp will never be drained, there will never be a big world altering reveal. You will screech paranoid theories online and people will think you're an idiot. That's all it will amount to.
For that reason I trust the government and believe everything they say. The moon landing happened whether it actually happened or not. DEAL WITH IT.
the point is the conflict. every time they're shown to be wrong it validates them. every time someone can't give an answer, or makes any error, they feel they've won.
Why did the director of nasa ,James Webb, resign right before they landed on the moon. He had been working on the mission nearly a decade quit as they were about to complete
It always baffles me that all the best scientists in the world at the time made all those obvious mistakes and oversights while creating the biggest and most scrutinized fake of all time. And even the russians didn't see shit.
I'm glad we have so many scientifically illiterate Cinemaphile schizos to debunk it now though.
>(secret) government agencies with literally unlimited funding >can't make a single hoax that can't be uncovered by facebook boomers
explain this one to me
amazing that homosexuals still think the moon landings were real especially amerifats. this is why youre all slave cattle for israelites so afraid to doubt your government would lie to you and so readily believing in those lies yourself its pathetic. cant even blame the israelites at this point.
You would think they won't tape over the footage of their agency going to the moon but no, i think you are explicitly required to be moronic to work in these kind of projects.
On the Moon (the real, literal Moon), the lunar rover had a camera attached which could be operated by the ground control. That camera was used to observe takeoff from the Moon.
There was NEVER a rover on the moon
NASA admits this by saying they are planning on having their FIRST rover on the moon by 2023
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/ames/nasas-next-lunar-rover-progresses-toward-2023-launch/
https://www.engadget.com/nasas-first-lunar-rover-will-scour-the-moons-south-pole-for-water-in-2023-160022034-170003713.html
consider suicide please
>NASA admits this by saying they are planning on having their FIRST rover on the moon by 2023
I mean true but I think these days Rover is an autonomous vehicle with no human involvement. So you're disingenuous.
>a false clickbait headline is a NASA statement
Meds, it clarifies right in that article that it's simply the first autonomous rover
Google first moon rover
You won't get an answer
Lol
Read the Wikipedia
It says no such thing that NASA landed it.
Plus, the Wikipedia makes it very confusing in saying it landed on a celestial body as opposed to just saying the moon
Decommissioned shorty after
are you black by any chance?
Nah, but I hate whites just as much as you hate non whites
A conspiracy theorist and a israelite?
Wow.
its always baffling how shitskins can think they're superior to anyone else.
so you're non-white
got it
What are you? Fourth generation American?
Do you have any land to your family's name?
My family has several, in Palm Springs, Nevada, and Minnesota
You most likely have ZERO
My family owns jack shit but I own land in Palm Springs, Nevada, Minnesota AND I recently bought the entire Grand Canyon.
Problem, poorgay?
Yeah, that's what I thought
YOU being white is so great that you've become complacent while non whites work their way to the front
And when you see that happen, you start complaining "white genocide!" in the comfort of your raggedy gamer chair as you continue to sip your Mountain Dew while playing cod
Lol get bent
I took a shit in your 'grand' canyon, and you'll never find it. Think about that every time that you visit, that rather than communing with the beauty of nature, you are in reality haunted by the phantom of my doody
I'm not even American lol
I was lying about owning property in the US as a jape.
Imagine being white and not owning a single strip of land
Lol
You failed as a species, in particular, a white species
I'm Saskatchewan, and I transfer my poopy curse to whatever local landmark you hold dear
you're right it was called a moon buggy
>nasa.gov/
>nasas-next-lunar-rover
How was there no delayed control of the camera tilt, with 60’s tech? I would honestly believe they tied fishing line to the base of the launched pod connected to the arm of a well oiled tripod and just sort of math’d it like boy scouts more than they had a telecommicable control in real-time alllllll those miles away
Because it's FAKE
Earth's radiation belt makes it extremely dangerous for a human to be able to travel to the moon
the van allen belt is currently a hard barrier for spacex and nasa because it fries microcircuitry, which both depend upon.
>spacex
that was ice you dumb idiot
Yeah, Earth's radiation belt aka the van Allen belt is the example I use all the time on people how believe NASA went the moon
Their reaction is always "what's that?"
Lol
because it was a non-issue for the apollo missions.
Meaning the technology was actually ancient enough to not be bothered by it?
yep. the apollo computer was 70lbs of metal and about as powerful as a dollar store calculator.
it’s capabilities are irrelevant. Were the ship, and the camera equipment for that matter, comprised of components that still worked as a computer but *not* be scrambled by radiation that scrambles our modern computers?
yes, old analog technology was much bigger than current technology, and not susceptible to gamma rays.
the capability of the apollo computer was stated to give a frame of reference to how much actual circuitry was present in 70lbs of metal. your phone has several million times as much circuitry.
Yes, you fricking moron. How could you know about the van Allen belt and not know that? No wonder you're a fricking moon landing denier.
Imagine what Nasa could do with a 3090 ti, which unfortunetaly they cannot afford, even after the crypto crash...
>Radiation is a nonissue
yep, they only spent a short amount of time in the belt.
chernobyl was bad because people were being exposed to high levels of radiation for hours/days on end.
They never went through the belt, anon
yea, they did. they also landed on the moon. also god isn't real and the bible is mostly bullshit.
It's called a belt and not a ball because it's weaker at the poles. Hence, rockets headed to deep space take a trajectory through the weakest part and end up fine. I'd provide a picture but you could google it.
anon hundreds of people work in chernobyl every single day. whether it was making the steel casing for the chamber that exploded or managing the other active nuclear reactors
no it's not
they are regularly flying geostationary satellites, far beyond the radiation belts
do you think people got their TV signal delivered by mail on a film reel?
at first, nothing, Alan Shepard sharted himself
Apollo had bags
>they are regularly flying geostationary satellites, far beyond the radiation belts
because they don't need to be active while passing through the van allen belt.
>satellites don't have electronics
>i don't understand why radiation is bad for microcircuitry
>Apollo had bags
I wonder how gross the air was by the time they made it back. imagine living in a fricking bathroom for days
if you fly through the thin part of the layer it’s not a big deal, they can shield electronics to a certain degree.
>extremely dangerou
you dont think america risked lives just to give the finger to russia?
>know the communications delay
>know when the liftoff is scheduled
>know the course
is this really that hard to comprehend?
…that is boy scout..consider me satisfied
The instructions to the camera were sent in advance and the timing was eyeballed. It was very fortunate that they got it right.
>I'm dumb as frick!
>therefore the moon landing was fake!
Every single moon landing denyer ever lol. Dunno why you morons get such joy from being called moronic.
>operated by the ground control
i'm pretty sure it was automated the mission was planned through down to the second
there really isn't much of a delay to the moon maybe a couple of seconds
pinging the moon would take 15 minutes
A couple of seconds is easily enough for the module to get way out of frame before the camera pans. I can't imagine radio control is the answer.
Do you think you're smarter than actual rocket scientists? They knew that and adjusted for it.
cameraman
Ignoring the fact that there's meant to be a camera man to get this shot, theres also no flame from any engine thrust at all it just ascends up by itself, maybe the pyrotechnics failed?
You're a complete tool if you think this shit is real.
you're probably trolling but the camera was controlled with a 1-3 second radio delay and thrusters in space don't exhaust fire in the same way they do in-atmosphere
Absolute brainlets, you see the thruster thrusting for one second and then it turns off because it's enough to keep it going.
All I see is sparklers and something being pulled up by a wire
>also no flame from any engine thrust at all
Why would there be a normal engine thrust flame in space without oxygen? How moronic exactly are you?
Imagine being this fricking stupid. There is a fricking UNMANNED rover on Mars tight now, testing soil and sending back HD images earth. God conspiracy theoriest are lowest form of scum. I hate you dumb fricking c**ts.
who was moving the camera as it lifted off?
They marooned a guy at the moon and this was the last footage he filmed before they detonated the remote explosive charges on his space suit.
But how did they retrieve the footage?
NASA has the public believing their satellite dish is strong enough to beam and receive live recordings from a small satellite dish that's attached to a rover 238,900 miles in space
Lol
Also, NASA never had a rover on the moon and yet so many people think there were several
Lol
What do you think radio waves are, homosexual?
The Soviets found it and delivered to NASA.
nah they went back and got him. how else did they retrieve the film?
that looks like a toy
moon man filmed it
I filmed it.
You are all morons, the earth is flat bros
Not necessarily flat, it's like a disc surrrouned by a dome, known as the firmament. Its not some flat rock floating in space.
>It's fine goy...
>...Don't ask questions
Can't believe how smart these guys were. They sent men to the moon in spacecraft made out of paper mache. Geniouses, like Albert Einstein.
>Geniouses
chimp brain
>obvious sarcasm
slug brain
>"JOKES ON THEM I WAS ONLY PRETENDING"
yeah sure
Its not pretending when its so obvious, guess you're just autistic and can't tell.
The LEM was designed to operate only in space and one the moon where there is no air so it could be made of thin materials like kapton.
The softer materials around the outside aren't part of the pressure hull (pic related), they're just part of the thermal insulation.
propellant is stored in the balls
Whar is supposed to be the problem here?
He thinks it should be built like a tank
So just another episode of anons not bothering to find out how the lunar module was assembled.
these morons think these craft were going to the bottom of the sea...also what is thermal shielding lol
Can't believe that the rest of the world fell for this fricking mutt lie and decided muttmerica was superior to the USSR. We could be living under based communism instead of muttism.
If it was such a big lie, then why did your USSR not call the US out?
I hate israelites but he probably will say something about israelites wanting people to think the moon is real or some crazy schizo shit. Flat earthers make the rest of us look bad
Communism is trash and Marx was 3rd cousin to the Rothschilds and a ~~*freemason*~~
Don't get me wrong capitalism is garbage too, but they control that as well (and it's not quite as shit.)
at least in commie russia there weren't gays and trannies
They weren't in capitalist America in 1969 either.
>We could be living under based communism instead of muttism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_15
Yeah, so superior!
>IT'S TAPE
if digital cameras didn't exist yet who the frick picked up the film from the launch to bring back to earth?
The footage was transmitted live to NASA. The portable cameras carried by the astronauts used film tho.
Suuuuuure
Trust me, bro. My dad works at NASA.
You can literally see differences in the hill in the back due to the sun being in a slightly different position and parallax.
couldnt that background literally just be a mountain range thats hundreds of miles away?
some gay living near the himalayas should take some photos of it on the same street but like with the floor being clearly different but the himalayas in the background being the exact same. because surprise surprise, big mountains forever away dont look all that different when youre that far away and a few hundred metres apart
Yeah right, and for some strange reason NASA destroyed all the technology related to the moon landing and has been building it all back from scratch since 1969
Blame Black folks.
fakest and gayest thing ever
embarrassingly bad
99% of the engineers who worked on the Apollo program are already dead of old age and the tooling was destroyed because it was economically unfeasible to store them for so long. Plus there were concerns that spies from countries such as North Korea could steal rocket tech from NASA and use it on their ballistic missile programs. It's the same reason all the tooling and schematics for the F-14 were destroyed.
They did though, they were just janky as frick. The apollo 11 craft had onboard computers
analog transmission existed
gay Black folk from outer sneed
Why are you asking so many fricking questions?
Where are the stars
They didn't include the stars because they knew astronomers would be able to line them up and call bullshit
contrast from sunlight reflecting from dunes obscures the starlight.
and there are people who actually want to live there? sounds like a life not much worth living if you can't see the stars
or can you still see them when you look directly up?
you could see it IRL dumb dumb, it's just that the camera doesn't pick it up becase dunes bright stars dim
try photographing the night sky with a streetlight in the frame
apparently you could kind of see them if you stood in the shadow of the lunar module and looked up at the sky, the glare was much reduced that way.
Also, the most spectacular night sky ever seen was on the Apollo 8 orbit of the dark side of the moon. The lack of sunlight meant that crew was basically basking in the unfiltered light of the cosmos and could see all the stars without any atmospheric distortion or glare from the sun, it must have been astonishing to see.
>you can see the start from earth >but not from the moon
Can you see the stars during the day?
Because that's the illuminated part they're walking on
try taking a picture of the night sky with a bright object in frame
very cool
thanks anon
that video made me happy 😀
What the frick are they doing?
science
>supposed low gravity
>sand doesnt fly higher than earth
Hmmmmmm
>thinks the moon is covered in sand
>"doesn't fly higher than earth"
it'd be crazy if it flew higher than earth because that's the moon moron
Yes it surely fricking does. Did you even watch the video?
are you blind homie?
That looks fun and cute as frick =D
>JOHN MADDEN
The footage is sped up you dishonest jerk
are you seriously trying to imply the footage was decelerated with how awkwardly they're strutting around? ahahahah homosexual
TERRIfying stuff
>mankind clumsily hops into the face of God
Needs Benny Hill music.
0:29 in:
>a guy wearing a 176lb suit and helmet falls over and then lifts himself airborne by extending his legs at the knees
>this was totally done in 1G
you got the one where the spacecraft is hovering over the moon right before it lands and you can see the steel wires holding it up then it tilts at the last second
i like how all the moon landing deniers left are clearly third worlders
Cope, and NASA means "deception" in hebrew.
of course you have source for this
why don't you ask your local rabbi?
>unsourced image
still waiting.
It's pronounced "nasha" but the four letters are still the same thing, cope harder.
>no source
okay then
Kek, gay gets owned.
Eat shit.
>source: the bible
yea that's self-own, mah homie. god isn't real.
Sorry, but I can't hear you over the sound of you eating shit, try again.
holocaust denial is a real crime
>4 letters are the same
>literally a different script
yeah hello means poop in some other languages and if you write how their pronounced in english it'll look similar do you think some people are actually going around saying "poop" to eachother? Fricken dumbass
https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/h5377/kjv/wlc/0-1/
Shills arrived.
But of course. Americans are unable to accept that they arent the greatest in everything. Vide first plane is from Santos Dumont but they wont accept it.
rent free
you will never be a mutt and that hurts you
oh boy a schizo thread
with a camera, moron
Reminder NASA rockets, with people on board, can somehow travel 238,900 miles in 11 days
that's only 900 mph
>only
My car can only go 120. How does something go 9x that speed with 11 people on board?
It's a fricking rocket
11 days nonstop at 900 mph? No food or water or sleep?
Ok
they had food, water, and sleep. also air.
What about bathroom breaks??
... yea they had those too...
you haven't read about literally any of this, have you.
You honestly believe they shut off the rocket boosters so they can all have dinner and a soda?
And when they were satisfied, they just turned on the boosters again?
What are you talking about? Once you’re cruising you’re cruising.
11 days to cover 238,900 miles
They weren't exactly cruising
You are gonna shit yourself when you find out what a vacuum is.
No. It's lack of interest and funding. Commercial space flight and the promise of cheap reusable rockets is the main reason we are seeing a new space race right now.
>lack of interest
Lol
That's why people have been talking about space nonstop ever since we faked it back on 1969, huh?
>lack of funding
Again, lol
Trump greenlit NASA to go back to the moon back in 2016 and NASA said "uhh sure" but then canceled their arrangement when trump put the pressure on
You keep defending NASA but everything they do always comes up short or is a no go
moron
holy shit did he just hook that dude's pocket with his pinky??
I think it's a belt loop hole
WTF???? I'M GOING INSANEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE HAAAAAAAA
You're right. Space agencies specifically leave bits and pieces of the TRUTH for god fearing righteous truth-seekers to know what's really going on. He didn't just accidentally yoink his pocket or anything after the guy did a full summersault. You're truly the next generation of big thinkers. Please pat yourself on the back
am I supposed to be seeing something here
????????????
the guy on the bottom right grab's bottom left's pocket or belt loop and the moron posting it is implying it's a string even though he did a full summersault
If it is a string how do they fake their fricked up faces from 0G?
they took drugs to increase their blood pressure
they're clearly drunk
Poor Marines. Their soul purpose is to take care of other morons and all with a smile on their faces
>That's why people have been talking about space nonstop ever since we faked it back on 1969, huh?
Talking about something doesn't equal action.
>Again, lol
I'm not saying they don't get funded, I'm saying they need an ungodly amount of money to do it to the point where it's unfeasible to fund a moon base. But recently costs are going down, or at least projected to. So things are picking up again.
Also, NASA ARE shit. I agree. They are a money sink who waste all their money on overpaid contracts instead of actual meaningful in house work, like the US army.
no you don't get it. Moon close! I can see it in sky! That mean moon easy. Moon isn't moving around 30 earths away, NASA big israelite lie
Trump gave NASA all the amount of money they ever wanted for the trip.
That's what greenlighting it means.
It means, here's all the money, take it, it's yours. Now go to the moon
But of course, people will still argue that money was, and still is, the issue
schizo spacing
And they are using that very same money to try and go to the moon with the ultimate aim of a moon base, called they Artemis program.
If my memory serves they are launching the first crewed moon mission in a few weeks.
Yeah we'll see how that pans out
Lol
Another moon landing and no promotion or coverage about it at all
Sorry. Meant to say unmanned. Manned isn't planned until 2024.
>no people will be sent to the moon, but maybe NEXT time!
Imagine my shock!
this will be a long one
NASA learned that congress or president could cancel their plan with a single stroke of a pen
which is what Nixon did in order to have money for Vietnam war
in a stroke of administrative genius, NASA spread Shuttle manufacturing all over the 50 states, so every congressman had a vested interest in keeping the jobs around and also funded the companies to keep the light on, just in case
that meant the costs of everything went up 10-100 times over the years
fast forward and 14 dead astronauts later, shuttle was cancelled, provided that ALL the companies will stay around
therefore, NASA spent the last 15 years trying to cobble Saturn V from parts made specifically for a Space Shuttle, which is going about as well as if you were ordered to build a helicopter from from Chevrolet C10
Why not? 900mph isn’t crazy. I think you’re confusing the effects of acceleration in a relatively frictionless vacuum with sustained speed
Also, Submariners hold their breath for six months.
>DUDES, LET'S PUT LITTLE HINTS IN THAT PROVE WE WERE FAKING IT
Why?
BECASUSE THEY HAVE TO TELL US
Schizo thread? Schizo thread
Is the belt the reason why we don’t have moon colony? And if there’s a secret moon colony, are they only able to live on 1960’s tech?
the asteroid belt is between Mars and Jupiter and asteroids are so far apart from one another that they're kind of a non-factor. And no there is not a secret moon colony because there's no real reason to have a secret moon colony.
nevermind now realizing you're talking about the Van Allen belt. Moon colony comment still applies
belts are a barely an issue
that are exaggerated by nasa as an excuse not to do anything besides Mars robot missions, Earth observation, and ISS because they wouldn't have funding to do all these things AND permanent lunar base
the belts are a huge issue for manned flight, as you can't just turn off life support, guidance, or communications systems.
Can’t just gear up in scuba tanks and turn the lights off while you gel your way across the belt? It would only take 6 hours at 900mph
you could also just camp out in the engineering tunnels in the nacelles
you know that are not fully homogeneous zones of radiation, they not only move, shrink and grow & follow the force lines of the earth's electromagnetic field, you can literally fly between them with minimal radiation exposure. Also the van Allan probes back in 2012 found much less radiation than expected in certain areas than expected
the point being, the only way to guarantee radiation doesn't fry microcircuitry is to have zero power running through said microcircuitry. everything else is just winging it.
Why do people think the van Allen belt is a thin strip of radiation that can easily be bypassed within a few seconds
The belt is a big as the earth's diameter
your image literally shows a cross section of the belts, as thin bands
1) space capsules are reasonably well shielded
2) electronics for spaceflight are radiation hardened
3) you can just fly above it
4) the radiation there is not constant and you can predict low or high activity
>just make it heavier
>and heavier
>and then spend even more fuel (heavier)
>and then say frick it and hope for the best
correct
the van allen belt is literally israeli propaganda to trick white people into avoiding space
I still cannot believe people think the moon landings were real. Fricking hilarious.
To those who believed we went to the moon, one question for ya: how many rovers did we bring to the moon?
3
technically none, they built them after they landed.
Lmao no fricking way you unironically believe that
why not? more efficient use of space for them to be assembled after landing.
"Built" isn't really the right word, but they did require some assembly. They were stored folded into the side of the lunar module.
US has sent three with Apollo 15-17, Soviets farted one out after Apollo 11, and pajeets and chinese have landed some relatively recently
No, the answer is none.
Zero rovers have been to the moon
NASA is preparing their FIRST rover landing in 2023
Their FIRST
you have subhuman intelligence and I sincerely hope your personal aid makes you go to bedtime soon
Why didn't you answer the question if you're so damn smart?
That MUST mean a low IQ motherfricker, like myself, knows more than you
Why did you ask the question if you knew the answer?
I did answer your question. If you want me to I can go to your house and direct your personal medical assistant to help you look things up. If not you can continue sniffing windows as usual
But you also believe the camera was attached to the rover as it was filming the shuttle lift from the moon's surface
>doesn't know what an antenna is
imagine my shock
Moving the goal post are we?
do you genuinely have debilitating autism? I'm just curious at this point because you're very moronic
You have given no sustainable answer in this thread and yet you are the one calling people morons?
So you even read NASA's own website?
*do you
circlejerking cope lol. When you're done seething I hope you get some good rest
yes, first robotic rover
we are talking about the "Lunar Roving Vehicles" aka buggies
Who shot that?
There are people that unironically believe that this actually happened in the literal moon
LOL LMAO EVEN
The american ego is reaching his brain from his ass
modern people have a hard time accepting the things that could be done by a country that was 90% white.
yeah, none of this looks spaceproof
I hope the helmet you have to wear for daily life is space proof at least
is that some kind of tent fabric to block the rocket thrust?
that's sunshield
the entire lunar module was covered in mylar foil to keep the sun from overheating it
also, it only held 0.3 atmosphere
you don't need much to keep 5 psi overpressure
construction paper
You would think with no light pollution on the moon, stars would be visible EVERYWHERE
>no light pollution
The landing was done during the day, the sunlight is reflecting off the lunar surface. Any capturing of the stars would completely white out the astronauts and surface.
The only gays on this website who can think this shit was fake are 2016 election tourist newbies. How else could you be so contrarian
GlowBlack folk have arrived.
Abandon thread!!
When we eventually get to commercial spaceflight, all moon landing deniers should not be allowed to participate.
I want space to be weaponized just so we can freeze these tards and use them as kinetic missiles
I reckon flat earthers should be encouraged to go to Antarctica to prove there's an edge of the world
the government has freeze rays so they can't
The votes of people who have 80 IQ and unironically believe that the moon landing was fake matters just as much as a person with an IQ of 150 and a PhD. This needs to be changed before society can prosper.
or we go napoleonic, if the most buttfricked moron can't understand a plan and why its good, the plan is fricked, as they will frick it up.
More pressingly there are places where voting is mandatory, they are forcing people to make decisions on matters they couldn't possibly hope to comprehend.
This is why Australia is able to be so authoritarian, so many people voting with no idea what's really going on
I must say, compulsory voting here in Australia is moronic. I have no idea who thought that was a good idea.
They introduced it in the 30s or some shit because the turnout was so low, their solution was to just make everyone vote even if they didn't want to.
A lot of people still don't vote though. I think I read that 30% of votes cast in the last election were invalid because people just submit empty ballots with nothing written on them.
An empty ballot should be a valid vote for "all the other options are so fricking terrible that I don't want to vote for them, frick you".
actually the only valid response to such a situation is violence until the options aren't terrible
Because it was fake, holy shit how can you be so stupid? It was faked because russophobic lards needed a win, any win.
Let's just assume that it was faked. Why didn't Russia call them out for faking it then? Or China? This is never explained by people who believe ithe moon landing was faked.
And that is why china is trying to go to the moon themselves.
To see for themselves that it's possible
China had their first rover on the moon back in 2013. They repeated it again in 2018 with another rover. In late 2020 they also became the third country to retrieve lunar samples.
China was also able to plant their flag on the moon, so if the US flag up there had been faked and didn't actually exist, they would have easily been able to call them out on it.
Because they don't exist either.
Have you ever met a Russian? Probably not.
And if you did, he was an actor.
It's obvious they are just inventing countries to take your money for protection.
schizo
morons be like "hur dur I'm just asking questions" but ignore every single answer they are given (They are too moronic to understand what is being told to them.).
With a camera
and here comes the larping
I want to believe they didn't go to the moon, it's more interesting that way
>Ha ha, these morons who think the moon landings were faked are so clueless!
>Oh and by the way, did you know that no mass graves from the holocaust have ever been found?? O-or so I've heard!
the duality of Cinemaphile
A fake moon landing would have 1 country working to keep up the charade
the holocaust has half the world pushing it
They literally did archeological studies where they dug up soil at Treblinka in multiple places and concluded that it contains vast amounts of a mix of human ashes, sand and dirt.
Yeah, I know. I posted a page from the report on one such archeological survey.
There are pits meters deep at each of the camps modified for mass scale homicidal gassings containing fragments of human bone, teeth, ash, hair, and fat decomposing into wax. Those in addition to the mass graves of shooting victims from the Einsatzgruppen purges.
maybe when people are literally turned into a handful of dust from incinerators they might be kinda hard to find again?
amogus
Apollo17.org
fun to watch the whole thing
Just started watching For all Mankind, why are they showing some hispanics crossing the border while a landing on the moon is taking place?
Will he become a janitor at Nasa?
Is this guy the mexican Werner von Braun?
Jesus Christ I hate these israelites ruining space Kino
they didnt have digital cameras in 1969 that could take stills
all stills had to be developed from old school "positives" or "negatives" on cellulose film
the gif in OP is a stream, but any stills that NASA released to the public from the apollo missions were not developed from film that had gone through the low pressures of the lunar surface
theres no special military grade high altitude film that resists a vacuum, thats magical thinking....the pictures are fake
>there are still people that think this was real
>that cheesy Godzilla movie rainbow effect when it detaches
bros...........
WHAAT!!! NO WAY!!!! IS THAT THE MOON???TOTALLY FAKE BRAH, UR RIGHT.
they expect one of us in the wreckage brother
.
lander/rover communicated with vessel in orbit around the moon, which communicated with satellites around earth, which communicated with ground facilities.
satellite broadcasts on Earth get relayed from geostationary orbit, delivering much higher (and now digital) video quality
plus the dish on the receiving end is much smaller than those in NASA's DSN
the tv signal from the moon went straight to Earth, but the dishes receiving it on Earth were (and still are) massive
https://honeysucklecreek.net/other_stations/goldstone/Bill_Wood_Goldstone/GDS_booklet/dss14.jpg
in fact during Apollo 13 we realized the frequency the SIVB was using was the same as the LM; quite annoying
Why is it always so painfully obvious that the people who make this don't even have the most basic understanding of technology?
I'm a big dumb fricking manual laborer and even I can figure this stuff out.
broadcasts from space are shit quality. most are monochrome and 4 megapixel
What I wanna know is how the frick they managed to make a phone call to the fricking moon
Being a conspiracy theorist is stupid. You're never ever gonna get proven right, and even if you are, nothing will come of it. The swamp will never be drained, there will never be a big world altering reveal. You will screech paranoid theories online and people will think you're an idiot. That's all it will amount to.
For that reason I trust the government and believe everything they say. The moon landing happened whether it actually happened or not. DEAL WITH IT.
the point is the conflict. every time they're shown to be wrong it validates them. every time someone can't give an answer, or makes any error, they feel they've won.
Why did the director of nasa ,James Webb, resign right before they landed on the moon. He had been working on the mission nearly a decade quit as they were about to complete
So it's out of his hands if it went wrong
It always baffles me that all the best scientists in the world at the time made all those obvious mistakes and oversights while creating the biggest and most scrutinized fake of all time. And even the russians didn't see shit.
I'm glad we have so many scientifically illiterate Cinemaphile schizos to debunk it now though.
when you shoot a laser at the moon and you get reflection, what is it?
>(secret) government agencies with literally unlimited funding
>can't make a single hoax that can't be uncovered by facebook boomers
explain this one to me
they want you to uncover the fake conspiracy so you can distract yourself with irrelevant bullshit
>government agencies
>competent
Wifi streaming camera.
Or cameraman.
people underestimate the sheer willpower of america wanted to frick over russia
with a live studio audience
It's such a shame that all of you aren't dead.
amazing that homosexuals still think the moon landings were real especially amerifats. this is why youre all slave cattle for israelites so afraid to doubt your government would lie to you and so readily believing in those lies yourself its pathetic. cant even blame the israelites at this point.
post some proof or shut the frick up
You would think they won't tape over the footage of their agency going to the moon but no, i think you are explicitly required to be moronic to work in these kind of projects.
ESL
Some stayed behind to film it.