The problem is that the flaws in this film are at a basic level. It could be about anything and it would still be fricking stupid in how the characters act and how the battles play out.
>b-but it was 6 million Ridley, please, why do you refuse to admit this? >oh yeah, was it? Were you there? Have you seen their bodies, counted them? >w-well no... but others recorded what happened >are these sources unbiased and objective? >uuhm n-n-not entirely I suppose but... >Didn't think so.
No. Don't be a little dumb c**t who thinks "biopic" suddenly means nonfiction.
Does being historically innacurate mean it has to be fricking moronic like British soldiers running down a hill to meet cavalry or Napoleon shooting at the sphinx for no reason?
the movie is garbage either way has nothing to do with "historical accuracy"
the movie is titled napoleon but it's more about josephine than napoleon
alexander was historically accurate...but so fricking what if the lead actor is some irish frick? why would you cast an irish as alexander the great? laughable. just like joaquin playing a young napoleon. literally the irishman tier
Alexander was KINO and honestly I thought Colin Farrell was great. How do you know that the Greeks/Macedonians didn't look like the Irish? Were you fookin there? That was 300 BC mate, ever heard of migrations?
>we aren't going to show the levée en masse, the mass national conscription and mobilization of the French citizen population via nationalism in the face of invasion by the coalition >we aren't going to show the mass restructuring of Ancien régime Europe along different borders and adoption of the Napoleonic code and the Continental system >we aren't going to show Napoleon leading his troops over a bridge over stubborn Austrian resistance at the Battle of Arcole >no instead we are going to have Napoleon make "mumumumum" noises and say "YOU THINK YOU'RE SO GREAT BECAUSE YOU GOT BOATS!"
Wadi Rum, lawrence of arabia
These landing craft definitely existed in the 12th century and the king of France definitely used them to fight against Robin Hood
Ridley Scott wasn't there during the Crusades either, ensuring his film would be a boring fantasy.
2023 was the year of has-been hack directors making 3-hour Oscar bait movies
...except for Oppenheimer, which was obviously the greatest cinematic achievement of all time...
Because Nolan isn't a has-been hack. He's like 20 years younger than his peers
Ooh look real not cgi and everything
Real fire n sheeit
>But some people were there and they recorded what happened, Ridley.
ok moishe
Sure. There's a nerd running around writing things down in the middle of a battle. Foh
Yeah, after they won
felton is british so he most likely liked the napoleon movie
they never got over that one french guy.
They beat him and made him live on a cuck island
Hell no Brits hate the movie just like anyone else. Nobody interested in history wants to see Napoleon done so poorly.
How do you know? Were you there?
yeah, from their perspective, which means frick all
The problem is that the flaws in this film are at a basic level. It could be about anything and it would still be fricking stupid in how the characters act and how the battles play out.
Then read what they wrote you massive homosexual, this is called "filmmaking".
Recorded what?
Typhus victims?
>b-but it was 6 million Ridley, please, why do you refuse to admit this?
>oh yeah, was it? Were you there? Have you seen their bodies, counted them?
>w-well no... but others recorded what happened
>are these sources unbiased and objective?
>uuhm n-n-not entirely I suppose but...
>Didn't think so.
If that’s your take, what interests you about history to the point that you want to make a history movie?
Waterloo was better
Napoleon actually leading cavalry charges was the most cringe thing I’ve ever seen.
Absoloutely fricking awful film, unsalvagable as a directors cut.
>neither were u moron
frick this homosexual Alien and Blade Runner were his only kinos
Blade Runner was a shit movie with great production design
BR2049 is unironically better
BR2049 is trash, the original is carried by Batty.
Worst part, he's running around on all fours like a hound and reciting nursery rhymes
Fricking moronic
Gladiator was pretty good too.
>inaccurate biopic
literally a waste of time
they can't even show it to schoolchildren
If Gladiator 2 is any good, it's due to Denzel
Obviously not with Paul Mescal in the cast
Only saw him in the daughter movie and he was good in that.
Yes, I was. What now homosexual?
Are we getting a new blade Runner movie?
>incels literally think an artistic motion picture about some dude who lived hundreds of years ago should be le historically accurate
Don't make a biopic then.
No. Don't be a little dumb c**t who thinks "biopic" suddenly means nonfiction.
Yes
Does being historically innacurate mean it has to be fricking moronic like British soldiers running down a hill to meet cavalry or Napoleon shooting at the sphinx for no reason?
the movie is garbage either way has nothing to do with "historical accuracy"
the movie is titled napoleon but it's more about josephine than napoleon
alexander was historically accurate...but so fricking what if the lead actor is some irish frick? why would you cast an irish as alexander the great? laughable. just like joaquin playing a young napoleon. literally the irishman tier
Alexander was KINO and honestly I thought Colin Farrell was great. How do you know that the Greeks/Macedonians didn't look like the Irish? Were you fookin there? That was 300 BC mate, ever heard of migrations?
Why does he hate the French so much?
it's genetic for anglos to hate continentals
What I don't get is why people think Ridley Scott still makes films worth watching. He hasn't made any for over 20 years
The wrong Scott died
Tony was 6/10 factory
Scott should make new Boatkino
>we aren't going to show the levée en masse, the mass national conscription and mobilization of the French citizen population via nationalism in the face of invasion by the coalition
>we aren't going to show the mass restructuring of Ancien régime Europe along different borders and adoption of the Napoleonic code and the Continental system
>we aren't going to show Napoleon leading his troops over a bridge over stubborn Austrian resistance at the Battle of Arcole
>no instead we are going to have Napoleon make "mumumumum" noises and say "YOU THINK YOU'RE SO GREAT BECAUSE YOU GOT BOATS!"
Ridley is unfunny version of Mel Brooks history films
Why does he look like an angry baby from ocarina of time?
>How do you know? Were you there?
>Yes
napoleon movie was a straight up character assassination. fucing hack director who should retire
Napoleon was nominated for best British film at Bafta. Lmao
That is sad
It definitely won't go to Cannes.
If the movie had been successful, this might have sounded like Badass.
Ridley always was a hack and his "good" movies were carried by designers, writers and his brother