there's only like 2 dozens of male actors, most being 50+, and almost all Japanese females have already been filmed (more or less willingly) regardless of their age
and since they don't want to import more exotic actors, while the youth prefer pedo-like content, the jav industry is doomed
and they haven't been willing to implement the obvious solutions lmaooo so yeah they're doomed, keep watching your waifus being fricked by senile viagra-propped 80+yo gremlins
The JAV industry always had almost no male actors. They don't make as much money. There is new blood joining every year regardless.
Why are you so obsessed with importing foreign workers to something that just works?
all this shit will be censored as frick, so you wont be making any porn
and there wont be any local models, not that you could run them even if there were
Considering in all attempts so far of AI movies that the actors faces are constantly morphing, probably never. That's an optimization problem they will never be able to fix.
Although I guess someone will need to explain the difference between AI and CGI Peter Cushing in Star Wars.
>they’ll never be able to fix the hands >fixes the hands >they’ll never be able to fix the faces though! >this new technology isn’t perfect yet so therefore it’ll never get better
Kys moron
I feel like writing an actual great screenplay (Not normies standards) is near impossible pre AGI
The best stories are aesthetically inspired, You can "feel" it throughout the whole project, LLM will just repeat the same formula, At best will just create Sorkin tier trash slop
AIgays think AI can create something like War and Peace and have as much of an impact. completely delusional. photography might have replaced painting but no photograph has been as profound as the sistine chapel
>photography might have replaced painting
except it literally did not
3 months ago
Anonymous
no one gets their picture painted anymore, you dumb moronic homosexual
we need a name to call you anti-AI Black folk. anyone have a suggestion? ask GPT kek
3 months ago
Anonymous
Luddite is already a term
3 months ago
Anonymous
>no one gets their picture painted anymore
Some people still do that's one. Painting was not just about replicating reality that's two. Not all painting was portrait paintings.
3 months ago
Anonymous
We have a name for you: reactionary, tribalist moron.
>Considering in all attempts so far of AI movies that the actors faces are constantly morphing
these are made with shitty open source free AI models. Proprietary AI models by private corporations are able to make AI generated humans indistinguishable from real humans
Notice how the faces never move...because if they did the image would distort.
>guy in the background vanishes randomly
damn AI is deep... gonna need to look up a youtube vid (also AI generated) to explain this one to me
>IT 2 WEEKS ITLL BE ALL OVER FOR HUMANITY >ALRIGHT IT WASNT OVER BUT THE NEXT VERSION ITLL BE OVER >OKAY THE NEXT VERSION MAKES THE SAME MISTAKES BUT IN 2 WEEKS IT WONT ANYMORE
Airplanes will never cross the ocean. You have to keep working the bicycle pedals to turn the propeller, and even the strongest athlete will be exhausted before he could make it even part-way across the Atlantic. The longest airplane flight has only been 11 minutes lmao. You fricking morons think it can replace passenger ships?
You will never be able to produce anything remotely resembling an actually watchable movie just by typing a prompt into a text box.
I say this with 100% certainty. I also say with 100% certainty that 5 years from now you and all the other shills will have slunk into the shadows and pretended like you never tried to shill this, well waiting for the next stupid get rich quick text scam to jump on.
3 months ago
Anonymous
This. The rapid evolution of AI across the past several years strongly affirms this: as dramatically as the visual quality has improved, the ability to construct an internally consistent logical universe has remained static at zero. You can call this "soul", but that isn't even necessary for the argument. The machinery has only been designed from the start to present a facade. That's what they do. They aren't going to spontaneously start doing anything else but that. The facades do get a lot nicer over time, though.
Oh shit. Everyone delete everything, this anon has figured it out. Let's face it ai will never progress, it's already reached its end in a couple of years
It clearly hasn't progressed because they purposely avoided having the ai models move their faces. They are obviously hiding how shitty it is. Same reason why the background is all blue sky and white ground.
>ai for the masses start several years ago >able to produce anything from text >hands were wierd but even artists have trouble with hands >much better now >able to make motion. Originally janky but now smooth >constantly being developed and refined >dumb ass horse riding anon still telling people it will never take off
Artpigs can see their days are numbered but still try to deny because they are delusional
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Artpigs can see their days are numbered but still try to deny because they are delusional
it'll actually be the opposite, human art will skyrocket in price in the future when less people care to learn to draw and be creative with their hands. therefore, thank you, ranjid. you can buy a mansion with some furry diaper fetish soon.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>human art will skyrocket in price in the future
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You will NEVER produce art.
3 months ago
Anonymous
I don't think you understand supply and demand or the fact that rich people pay exorbitant amounts of money for niche items.
3 months ago
Anonymous
I don't think you understand tax fraud.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Then I guess the supply will cause prices to rise as the rich have a stagnating supply of pieces to commit tax fraud with.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>finally a masterpiece to rival the Mona lisa >no ai could produce such kino >sonic giving birth to a vitiligo tales who already has a full diaper. Amy looks on in approval >ten million dollars doos
>the faces constantly distort, it'll never work >ok it works now, but not if they change their expression. It'll never work. >it will never be any better than it is now, even though this technology literally didn't exist a couple years ago
They're embroiled in litigation with regards to copyright and AI as a whole has a reputation associated with deepfakes/fake news and they don't want the stink associated with that
but this is a giant leap forward, look at how it can capture reflections, biomechanical motion, and have something resembling a 3d world model where you can look behind objects and it actually stays consistent
they literally showed minute long clips you fricking moron
how long do you think the average scene in a movie is before the camera cuts to something else? all dialogue scenes are back and forth
I posted a real video the other day trying to pass it off as AI generated and the artgays fell for it, pointing out all the "tells" where there are none. just admit your time is over homosexual
3 months ago
Anonymous
>thinks some fricking nerds in california are going to render human creativity obsolete forever
moron
3 months ago
Anonymous
Wow, there continues to be no meaning or continuity. A broken fragment of an empty dream aping a narrative. Cool!
lmao you're fricking SHAKING in your heels, troony
3 months ago
Anonymous
The same thing happens if you post a picture of a woman and tell Cinemaphile it's a troony.
Explain your rational, informed opinion for why you believe the majority of human beings would rather watch a 2-hour AI generated slop movie instead of watching the new popular Korean drama or Marvel movie. I insist.
not him but I used my brain for 4 seconds and thought of a few examples >the individual producer has for more power now >there will be more ideas explored >the hollywood celebrity will die out in favor of AI ones over time >calling something slop (while in the same sentence implying that kdrama and marvel productions aren't the same thing) is incredibly dismissive so you're probably not even trying to have an honest argument anyway
also, i would love for you to explain what separates those two from slop in your own words
Korean dramas are better than you think they are and they are enjoyed among families thus giving them an important social edge. I'll give you that modern Hollywood is no better than AI though. All your other arguments are stupid. An AI robot singer will never be more popular than Taylor Swift for example
3 months ago
Anonymous
>uhh kdramas are actually good and ur stupid
as expected from Cinemaphile
>2-hour AI generated slop movies DAILY created entirely based on all the data collected from your online data-print (i.e. websites you visited; browsing habits; social media feeds; childhood/scholar/professional background; consumption of non-AI art/entertainment; pictures saved on cloud; etc)
instead of slop created to satisfies masses and demographics you're not part of
>Explain your rational, informed opinion for why you believe the majority of human beings would rather (anything) instead of watching the new Marvel movie
Also "Red Caps" are what they call the soldier caste in faerie lore. Faeries being creatures of illusion. So we can assume "Weaponized Illusion" is the name of the game here.
The story telling here is too complex for Cinemaphile. You'll have to name one of the characters Dr Bad Guy, and make sure everybody wears logos on their chests.
First sustained and controlled heavier-than-air powered flight was 1903. We landed on the moon 66 years later.
To think that some problems won't be solved with time is ludicrous.
>Thinking real life is a fricking tech tree scientists unlock by grinding xp.
You're the one who brought up "xp". And they are different branches. That's why it's silly when people say things like "a modern xbox is 50000 times more powerful that the computer on Apollo 11!"; computing and rocketry are different branches. You don't need a lot of compute to build and control a chemical rocket.
>Considering in all attempts so far of AI movies that the actors faces are constantly morphing, probably never. That's an optimization problem they will never be able to fix.
lmao NEVER
>an ai comes out where the faces are not morphing >anon doesn't look and instead boldly asserts that the morphing from before will never be solved
honestly amazing
Hopefully soon so that all actors are forced out of their jobs and I no longer have to listen to multi millionaire nepo hires give their opinions on the climate, the economy or muh pwecious wittle bwown pepo.
You're the kind of moron who enjoys the same regurgitated capeshit but hey you like it ironically because you used the magic meme buzzword so that means it good now
Look at the first AI photos, many had fricked up shit, then 6-12 months later they were 10x better. This is just the alpha version, it's very impressive so far. In a year or two (or less) its going to be mind blowing, just like how photo AI is now.
But it's true. A year or two ago few people were saying AI was going to be a big deal, then suddenly it was and artists and writers went into an insane rage about it very suddenly w=once they realized what was happening. Things are moving very fast.
>they are on an elevated terrace above the market place >*AI sucks so it distorts the image* >OK, actually, they were at ground level in the market place >Please ignore they are giants compared to everyone else >*AI sucks so it distorts the image even further* >Oh, yeah, there is also some random nigglet there now!
Damn...AI is so...intelligent...
You're right, but I can still expect morons like this
Genuinely great, absolutely seemless transition between scales. If that was in a real movie a lot of people would consider it for an academy award. Few people would even think of it let alone know how to execute it that well.
to believe that inhuman digital slop is better than human efforts
>wow light bulbs only last 2 hours?! >pfft an automobile will never cross the country >digital painting won't take off, it's not real paint >printing press will never take off
Genuinely great, absolutely seemless transition between scales. If that was in a real movie a lot of people would consider it for an academy award. Few people would even think of it let alone know how to execute it that well.
You are a low IQ moron if you think narrative mediums like cinema or literature will be replaced by AI generated novels or movies. Music and video games however will be largely AI at some point in the future since they're sensory mediums and no one really gives a shit about who makes them as long as they're enjoyable
>It will come for music next. >Enjoy life in a pod with AI produced content directly projected into the brain.
if AI can make better films and better music than humans can, how is this a bad thing?
it only means better, cheaper, and more varied products for the consumer.
Perhaps in a couple decades I'll be able to watch thousands of different AI interpretations of live action berserk, with full voice acting, music, and no censorship. Hollywood could never.
And if it means thousands of nepotists kvetch over it then it's even better. This is exactly what the industry deserves.
Well art has long been one of the most vital means of expressions for people, and the process in great art is as important as the results.
Of course if you just want slop that is better than the current shitty slop then it's fine. I guess it will be able to generate something that would imitate actual art too, but I think something will always be missing. Or maybe not. I guess actually doing things is obsolete, the focus of the future is only the mind itself.
it's not as if people will be banned from making art
if you make art for its own sake because you enjoy it, this won't affect you any more than digital art programs, the film industry, music industry, etc., already do.
Well some art requires a lot of money to produce. Hollywood overinflates it's budgets, but some films really do often need at least several millions to produce. Ambitious large scale art will probably not get funding and might itself have to resort to using AI.
Anything is possible, but probably not going to go the way anybody has predicted so far if that happens. But just how many different industrial level changes would need to overnight be shifted into those capacities are still in human hands to implement.
>IT 2 WEEKS ITLL BE ALL OVER FOR HUMANITY >ALRIGHT IT WASNT OVER BUT THE NEXT VERSION ITLL BE OVER >OKAY THE NEXT VERSION MAKES THE SAME MISTAKES BUT IN 2 WEEKS IT WONT ANYMORE
As someone who has basically destroyed my life over the last 1.5 years prompting well over 100,000 AI images, I find it really sad how much "soul" has disappeared with the models getting focused on photorealism. I have so many cool gens from Midjourney v2 v3 where the AI didn't really know what I was asking for so just generated weird images that didn't follow any logic, but now doing the same prompt with V5 or V6 just makes very good looking generic images that look like real life.
I think i'd rather watch an AI movie from a specific trained model than an AI movie from a realism model.
I deleted my copy of SD even though I can feel it calling me back to reinstall it.
Too dangerous when trying to get over porn. Sure all the models I was making had giant pair of breasts in their showcasing cleavage but the models apperence were too dangerous looking to keep them.
Another example. Same prompt 1.5 years apart. Left looks like shit, but is much more artistically pleasing. Right looks accurate but looks like a boring instagram painting.
Can feel this. After messing around in stable diffusion for like a week about 6 months ago I already felt I was losing my sense of reality
Another example. Same prompt 1.5 years apart. Left looks like shit, but is much more artistically pleasing. Right looks accurate but looks like a boring instagram painting.
That's an interesting point I never considered; could you please share some more examples?
Another example. Same prompt 1.5 years apart. Left looks like shit, but is much more artistically pleasing. Right looks accurate but looks like a boring instagram painting.
I think the vagueness of early AI works nicely is the same reason a vague fortune/horoscope works. You give it context and reason even though it's completely meaningless.
(and that's why modern artist like abstract shit, because they have nothing to say nor any skill)
Also this is starting to bring up an interesting visual from some movie like Vanilla Sky where you start suspecting you're in virtual reality. You can only tell from small glitches in the distances and in less clear spots.
can i film myself fapping (eyes pov) then the footage be doctored by ai so that I have a bigger dick? or simply describe my hands, body, clothes as close as possible
anyway this looks so weird
3 months ago
Anonymous
I play a lot of VR and spend my evenings nude with the wife with our windows all shut. I was thinking it would be so fricking cool if I could bring my dick in to the game, using the cameras on my quest somehow. Imagine looking down and seeing your penis it would be immersive as frick, even just to play eleven table tennis or try not to hit it with my clubs when doing golf+. Anyways I know you guys are all nerds and shit, can I do this somehow? Is it an AI thing?
I honestly can think of a single positive, worldly reason why AI videos need to exist. This technology brings literally nothing but negative consequences. Deepfake hoaxes, pornography, blackmail, creative destruction, laziness, loss of craftsmanship, erosion of public trust. AI pictures and audio can be useful, but this? Not a single good thing outside of individual pleasure which is meaningless. And yet we are expected to applaud whenever corporations make breakthroughs like this in AI because heckin' epic science will save the world of course and we don't need art or philosophy or human compassion or religion anymore
I’d rather those pervert goofs keep it because I don’t give a shit what they do already. The use case for a lot of these prompting softwares on top of how they are monitored on an exchange and processing basis continues to limit the scope of capability (re:the moral police curate them all to an extreme degree already—the gatekeeping is already bricking the opportunity for expression and experimentation with the raw tools). It’s already their rich boy playground, why pay into it when the bogus relationship they’re wanting to force on the user is so hamstrung?
>ai chatbots, image generator, voice generator, music generator are fine. But ai video generator is where i draw the line! It's far too dangerous!
What a bizarre thing to say.
AI chatbots, images and audio can be useful for certain things like concept art, audiobook narration, problem solving, information research, etc. They bring bad things but there are some positives at least. AI videos however are completely bad for the world unless you're a coomer, because that's what 99% of people will use it for anyways.
nice, but I hope you know this means you're a homosexual who has no right to praise actual human art on this board or complain about the state of cinema when you willfully want to consume inhuman slop instead
Look at the garbage in their "safety" section. AI might replace Hollywood some day, but it won't be an OpenAI product. ChatGPT is worse than an 80s televangelist, anything this sort of tech produces will be after school special tier.
As a robot autist this is is a better robot design than any robot in the last 20 years (with two exceptions). If it were a real hollywood movie it would have a dumb human mask and soft shoulders
exactly this. most people won't give a shit outside of when porn scandals or hoaxes happen. AI is mostly a niche hobby. the real threat isn't that hollywood or video games will collapse like dumbfricks keep saying, the threat is that people will lose faith in reality knowing everything can be faked
It feels like to be safe against AI taking your job you need to be really creative with a strong unique style which few people have. If you just produce technically competent slop AI will replace you.
If you're talking exclusively about art, hopefully we return to a premodern view of art where the process behind creating something matters just as much as the final product.
you have to experience reality at the appropriate resolution I guess. go to the sora website and find the video of the eye. it's very clearly ai generated. it will never look like the real thing
It already is for many people, they believe the massive amounts of propaganda they are fed by their governments and media. AI will just reinforce those delusions.
>in 6 months the pajeet AI slop threads will go from jpegs to webms of Emma Watson and Daisy Ridley and Taylor Swift taking black wiener or being fricked by tentacles
The new golden era of Cinemaphile
In the year 1910, did people go >These flying machines are dandy toys and all, but they will never have any real use as they can barely carry a couple of envelopes!
I can't find the old cartoon that reads like a Ben Garrison cartoon of a car sinking in the mud and a horse mocking it.
99% of new ideas fail can't become completely forgotten to history.
But because they're completely forgotten, nobody is able to remember them to use them as examples of ideas that failed, leading to morons who don't understand survivorship bias on ironically believing that all technology infinitely improves forever with no limit and can never fail.
this kek. i would understand this sentiment if we were in like 2000 BC or something, but i genuinely cannot comprehend the luddites ITT
two-digit IQ, emotional responses really
3 months ago
Anonymous
it's just a toy. all it will generate are dreams, simulacra, fairy dust. shit doesn't exist. why do you support the creation of more and more powerful illusions?
3 months ago
Anonymous
you're on the television and film board
3 months ago
Anonymous
those are made by real people and the good ones are very powerful creative works that benefit society
3 months ago
Anonymous
> all it will generate are dreams
Jesus you must have the shittiest fricking dreams if that's a negative in your mind.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>i WANT simulacra to proliferate
tunnel vision morons like you deserve this world
3 months ago
Anonymous
Mate all media is simulacra. The news isn't even fricking real.
3 months ago
Anonymous
there are degrees of correspondence to the real.
3 months ago
Anonymous
No there isn't. It's all fake. Game of Thrones is as real as someone telling you about what they did last weekend. It'd all ephemeral to the audience. They construct the meanings in their heads.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>flaubert's temptations of st. anthony is as unmoored from reality as an ai generated video of bear dancing in a disco
lost
3 months ago
Anonymous
you're a dinosaur: your world is dead, you'll be forgotten by the new masterrace
3 months ago
Anonymous
>illusion
AI is here. its literally right in front of you, right now, and you're still refusing to acknowledge it
3 months ago
Anonymous
It'll be GREAT for jerking off or making political propaganda- oops, sorry to be redundant.
>absolute brainlets in ITT complaining about irrelevant stuff in the videos
Do you remember when AI pictures looked like pic related a few years ago? I'm certain in a few years you will be able to create your own shows with prompts. Down the line you will also be able to create video games with a click.
All the errors in the videos will be gone in a year or only a few months.
the ai will never a capture the lifelike quality of real things filmed in a real universe. as convincing as it is, it can only generate content at the plane of the image. cope and seethe.
>can't even begin to comprehend what I'm talking about
ai gen will only look as good as anything can look on your screen, but there are real properties that a real camera captures that can never be simulated. arguing otherwise is foolish. the day ai generated content convincingly simulates a real physical universe at the most fine-grained level, then they will have succeeded in creating one. cope and seethe
Nothing wrong with using AI for special effects work or worthless slop like the screenplay for shit like Madame Web. All other movies must be untouched by AI however and if you disagree you are a slave to zog
There is so much probability maths and algorithms involved the coding will feel like piss easy in comparison. Don't need to worry about that. They are also hungry for general data scientists.
it's gonna be fricking insane when this technology develops more.
just yesterday i was reading about no-budget films like one nolan made with $6k. i think we're still a long ways away from creating movies with that kind of polish but something compelling could still be made soon. can't wait.
Physical stuff is pretty hard. Probably because virtually they can just have it repeat over and over again but physically it takes time and the parts wear out and are a bit different every time.
I've been promised non-embarrassing AI for over a year now, has the next AI winter already started? Can't seem to get out of the bad art / bad coding / hallucinating LLM hole.
2 MORE WEEKS SIR
YOU ARE BLOODY BASTARD LUDDITE, AI DESTROY YOUR JOB ANY DAY NOW AMD AND CREATE MUCH KINO FOREVER SOON, NOW INVEST IN KUMARS STARTUP AI COMPANY
You don't get it Hollywood is replaced by AI. Everyone can make blockbusters in their bedroom in 2 years. Netflix everything is done.
Being a creative is done in 10 years.
>computer I'm in the mood for a nice scifi film inspired by bladerunner, no blacks in the movie, strong male characters. Female characters, big boobs emotionally supportive. Run time around 2 hours.
>being able to replace Hollywood greenlit globohomosexual slop with your own bespoke movie means you're planning on never leaving your basement again
Seethe more artgay.
no, he can't. right-wingers always demand that everyone conform to THEIR ideals, while creating nothing of their own. see: social media, movies, music, etc
There's like one non-globohomosexual movie a year if that. AI will enable people to create actual art again instead of just liberal/leftist slop that worships corporations and war.
Nah, AI will be neutered so people don't make nono content that doesn't have the approval of the nebulous establishment
3 months ago
Anonymous
We can look at image generation and see that's not happening though. Tons of models are open source and aren't pozzed and there's no way they can realistically control that on a global scale.
>oh no the CEO and main ~~*investor*~~ of the company is israeli
wow you really got me there schlomo.
tick tock hollywood israelite
3 months ago
Anonymous
They got rid of Altman last year
3 months ago
Anonymous
What motivates them? Seriously. Why did Oppenheimer build the bomb? Why does Altman create horrific AI technology? They know it brings more harm than good. So why do israelites do it?
>Create the perfect kino >Watch it once >Delete it, and revel in the knowledge that nobody else will ever experience that level of kino
Life could be beautiful.
>computer I'm in the mood for a plain omelet, no potatoes, tomatoes instead, a cup of coffee and wheat toast
The AI will be as rigid and lobotomized as the diner.
Do you even understand that when everyone can do it on their computers there's no need for Hollywood? If they don't call for regulation on AI their own greed will be their undoing.
Hollywood has been unnecessary for decades. They've always been about maximizing profits, lobbying and pushing out products. They'll probably find a way to make it so that their AI slop are the only AI movies people are able to see.
they can regulate what they want, I'll be using the uncucked chinese programs or whatever
they could ban AI entirely and it wouldn't matter, they can't stop it from being propagated. They can ban making AI porn of taylor swift, but anyone with stable diffusion on their pc can recreate it in 10 minutes.
When Cinemaphile complains about muh librul artgays, do they just mean illustrators? Doesn't make much sense otherwise, I don't see how AI has any effect on art.
consider AI as a tool like Photoshop and other computer software (for 3D, videos etc): it can potentially makes boring repetitive stuff much easier and quicker (ex. in-between images for animes/cartoons; mockups and storyboards; promotional arts; background images)
like Photoshop isn't just use for correcting professional photos or creating entire 2D images: there's a very wide spectrum of usages and techniques that increased the productivity of artists (who had to adapt or perish or find a niche style impossible to imitate)
Yes, the point being that AI only replicates the mundane stuff that does not actually make a real artist an artist, i.e. a meaningful communication of a thought, because computers (contrary to the claims of I FRICKING LOVE SCIENCE redditors) can't think and are nothing like human minds.
Most good scripts/novels today can't get funding because they aren't diverse enough or don't push a very specific liberal worldview. AI will open the door for artists to once again create art that doesn't cater to the Democrat establishment.
No it won’t because the same people will have a strangle hold over a AI
They have already neutered it and it will be much worse once they fully monetize it
They are letting you play with it now with some restrictions of course because it’s helping them train the models
there will always be alternatives. There will be slower models from the third world without restriction, there will be cracked versions, open source versions.
If I could donate a portion of my paycheck to openai every week to hasten the advancement of AI, I would do it. That's how bad I want to opt out of israeli owned media. Like what OpenAI is creating is beyond just a mere product, it's a moral good, a potential future method for independents and hobbyist to create their own video games, comics, cartoons, tv shows, and movies at trivial costs. We can finally unhook ourselves from the current pozz media landscape and truly be free. I can almost cry from imagining how good the future can be if we get AI right.
This is exactly how I feel. Sam Altman may go down as the greatest human to have ever existed if he gets that 7 trillion and enables AI to be used by all. Can you imagine it? AI robot gfs, non israelite media, no need to work, and full dive vr simulations to live out any fantasy you want. Star trek can become reality.
Democracy was a stupid experiment, only monarchies and dictatorships can prevent the total erosion of civil society. Saudi Arabia and China are the future of the world
That accurately describes these videos (and series of AI still images): they can't extrapolate a consistent internal story. The fact that the visual clarity is so much higher means little when visual quality has never been an indicator of a good story, abstract simplified art styles with good narratives have always dominated beautiful imagery with nonsensical/broken logic.
This whole approach is completely backwards with respect to our psychology: we don't see the world as a collection of objective building blocks and then construct the story, we literally *see the story* and then infer the blocks. AI attempts to create an illusion of story through the perpetual refinement of ever more polished blocks, but it still lacks the fundamental intelligence and awareness to perceive and communicate any logically consistent meaning beyond happenstance.
This is just a ML program that turns text into video. The logic side of things is the chatbots. When combined (as we are currently seeing with text to image) it has the logic you are complaining is missing, if it does anything wrong you can just ask it to correct that part.
>AI attempts to create an illusion of story through the perpetual refinement of ever more polished blocks, but it still lacks the fundamental intelligence and awareness to perceive and communicate any logically consistent meaning beyond happenstance.
Yeah no shit, no one is saying that AI is going to independently create works of art. It is a tool that a human can use to create things
>no one is saying that AI is going to independently create works of art.
Literally dozens of shills have spent this entire thread claiming that in just two years or less anyone will be able to type a one sentence prompt into a textbox and an AI will instantly generate a seamlessly realistic, fully functional movie with a completely coherent story, dialogue and visuals that will be not just equal to, but somehow superior to any movie actual writers, actors and directors can make.
>but it definitely will be possible in the future.
No, it won't.
2 straight years of so called improvement and still none of this crap can successfully make a realistic looking human hand, but you expect anyone to believe that just a few more years from now it'll be flawlessly replicating multiple human beings at once in seamlessly realistic environments, consistently rendering all of them looking the same way throughout and entire two hour movie, while also telling a compelling and sensible story with convincing synthetic dialogue, and say anyone who doesn't 100% believe this it's just a Luddite?
You're moronic. Just goes to show AIgays have literally no mental ability to grasp just how many tiny intricate details go into a movie.
It's not about visual details, it's the fact that are is a process of intellect and composition. Like I said here
AIgays think AI can create something like War and Peace and have as much of an impact. completely delusional. photography might have replaced painting but no photograph has been as profound as the sistine chapel
War and Peace can't be replicated because the book comes from a massively creative mind and is littered with nonfiction philosophical essays in the middle of the story. That cannot be repeated by an AI. You need a real human mind to capture that level of depth and diversity and creativity. AI movies will only be worthwhile if you want mindless bullshit like mainstream Hollywood, otherwise the rest of the industry will move on as usual
3 months ago
Anonymous
Why do you think we're going to put the ai in the directors chair and press a make movie button, humans are going to use this as a creative tool. It doesn't matter that the ai can't create by itself, neither can the paintbrush.
3 months ago
Anonymous
People in this thread literally think that putting in a prompt will create an entire movie
3 months ago
Anonymous
It will, it will just create AI slop. That doesn't mean you can't use it to create something good.
3 months ago
Anonymous
It can already create entire scientific papers that outdo humans. It can make interactive stories while people play along.
Formating the responses as prompts to fill things out visually is not a major challenge.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>rest of the industry
What rest of the industry. Look at 90% of the movies released over 2023 and honestly say they couldn't have been written by AI
3 months ago
Anonymous
You know that people make movies outside of mainstream Hollywood right? I saw a few last year, they were pretty good
3 months ago
Anonymous
And they are as relevant as the people who still get their portraits painted instead of getting a picture.
Sure there will always be a few dozen people who care about it but the majority of the industry that exists today is going to disappear
3 months ago
Anonymous
It's really funny that you think the outcome of AI is that people will simply stop watching movies altogether and watch AI generated narratives when the real outcome is just that Hollywood will use AI to write scripts and do special effects
3 months ago
Anonymous
>it's funny that you think [bunch of crap you never said]
My entire point is that almost every job in the industry is going to be replaced. Glad you agree at least partially with that even if you have to save face by creating a strawman to argue against
3 months ago
Anonymous
>My entire point is that almost every job in the industry is going to be replaced.
Lmao, are you the same breed of moron that thinks robowaifus or whatever anime shlock you got bouncing around in your head are going to replace biological women?
3 months ago
Anonymous
>You need a real human mind to capture that level of depth and diversity and creativity
Of course you do but that one mind no longer needs massive funding and hundreds of crew as he can instruct the AI to build each scene to his liking.
Most people don't think that AI is going to build an entire movie out of a single prompt. It's going to be an iterative process between a single person/small team and the AI.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>You need a real human mind
Bold of you to claim that the arrangement of meat molecules and electricity in the human brain will never be catalogued.
Yes, anyone will be able to do that, it doesn't mean that anyone will be able to do it well. It will still take a good director, it just so happens that all it takes is one talented man and he can create, at the very least, an entire rough draft for his movie at home with just his computer.
multimodal models will combine story generation with video generation as well as audio generation. All you need then is consistency of characters and bam you've got a movie.
>All you need then is consistency of characters
How many years? I haven't seen a single model that can generate the exact same character twice. There is no perception of the minute details that make a character a character, and every little facet and fragment of their design, clothing, accoutrements, scenery, etc. Only broad observational patterns, like "red hair" or "visible nipple" or "apartment interior". In order to have consistency the machinery needs to recognize that a THING is a THING, and not any other thing. They're not programmed to do that. They simply present a high probably match for a given simple request by breaking it down into arbitrary subcomponents, not one of which it understands (or is designed to understand) as a discrete "thing".
You've lost the story.
None of those improvements matter: the same lack of internal consistency is present at every single level of the hierarchy.
Again: your toy is getting very good at making pretty facades. *It has still not done, and is not designed to do, anything but*.
Why is it so difficult for you to separate the *visual fidelity* from the inherent meaning, unless you're physically incapable of perceiving the latter on any level?
>Cinemaphile goblins are dazzled by surfaces and blind to depths
many such cases. keep fighting the good fight anon but you will never make them understand
3 months ago
Anonymous
>muh depth! >furry porn of sonic getting pegged by robotnik while tails takes a shit >so powerful
Only internet "art" I ever see is generic anime porn and Co's next flavor of the month mystery meat e-girl.
Real artists are crying about ai art. Only those that make generic Twitter porn do.
It's been explained already, it doesn't have internal consistency because there is no memory. This just takes a prompt and turns it into video. The logic and internal consistency side of things is the chatbot technology and they will be merged into a general ai in the future
Anti-AIgays are genuinely moronic, they simply can't seem to comprehend the situation and extrapolate the future. The "but I did have breakfast this morning" of internet arguments
Utterly embarrassing
>haha i'm so smart i'm literally only capable of seeing things in diametrically opposed extremes
You are literally the "but I did have breakfast this morning" of internet arguments. It's you.
I'm talking about the obviously clueless morons posting in this thread, and on this website in general
AIgays think AI can create something like War and Peace and have as much of an impact. completely delusional. photography might have replaced painting but no photograph has been as profound as the sistine chapel
>AIgays think [something no "AIgay" has ever stated]
Are you paid to post this?
>I'm talking about the obviously clueless morons posting in this thread, and on this website in general
....you're _not_ like the other girls? please sweetie lmaooooo
>haha i'm so smart i'm literally only capable of seeing things in diametrically opposed extremes
You are literally the "but I did have breakfast this morning" of internet arguments. It's you.
AIgays are people whose understanding of extrapolation is that flipping one switch may not be consciousness, flipping a hundred switches may not be consciousness, but flipping a trillion switches very very quickly totally is consciousness
This but unironically. And they've been doing it for years now. >lol imagine thinking that chatgpt could ever make anything resembling a hollywood blockbuster
Thanks for proving my point. You're literally not capable of having an intelligent discussion on this topic, which you've now made apparent to the thread. When you act this way, not only does it embarrass you, it damages the credibility of the entire "side" you're trying to support.
And because your type is infinitely predictable and pathological, you'll now proceed to do the exact same thing, greentexting this post with another from your security blanket söyjak folder. Your ego won't permit you to do anything else. You couldn't stop yourself if you tried.
AIgays are soulless automatons themselves in a lot of ways.
They watch a movie or a TV show, and inside their heads all they perceive is "There's people on the screen and they're moving around", so when their novel little AI toy can also generate a 5-second video clip that vaguely looks like people on a screen moving around, their soulless mind is genuinely incapable of seeing any difference between the two, or understanding how anybody more intelligent than them could see the differences between the two, and take to the internet to proclaim that this is the future and all entertainment will someday be replaced by it.
>Considering in all attempts so far of AI movies that the actors faces are constantly morphing
these are made with shitty open source free AI models. Proprietary AI models by private corporations are able to make AI generated humans indistinguishable from real humans
>Umm but it's a person on a screen that's moving around! That looks pretty realistic, if you don't squint or examine any of the fine details, that's literally indistinguishable from what real movies are!
Thanks for proving my point, my soulless automaton friend.
but anon wake up... real people in real life _are_ browner (without accounting the miscegenation you fear, the increase of 4-6°C worldwide throughout the 21th c. will make people less white inevitably lmaooo)
3 months ago
Anonymous
Shalom!
3 months ago
Anonymous
>the increase of 4-6°C worldwide
I don't think you understand how this works even slightly.
Your crippling inability to recognize real people aside, the fact that literally the only part of this argument you fixate on is whether or not it actually looks like a person on the screen just keeps proofing what I said. Youre a soulless automaton who doesn't actually understand or even realize that there is a deeper meaning behind anything that you perceive. You just see a person on the screen and think "This counts as a movie! Movies have people on screen too, so why don't people think this AI clip is just as good as a movie!".
You don't know or care who this person is, or what they're doing, or what their history is, or what their goals are. You yourself lack such internal mental faculties, which is why you think all it takes to replicate a movie is for people to be on a screen and moving.
>it doesn't have... LE SOUL
sad cope
it will get so good that you won't be able to tell the difference, you will continue to insist that you can, and that the real thing is better, but when presented with the real thing vs AI, you won't know which is which.
This, then, is the pathological, tribal nonsense of the low-intellect, low-information adherent, as previously noted. It's disappointing how great an injustice it does to those who hold AI in high esteem for genuine pragmatic purposes. Much like the AI itself, it cannot think, it can only posture and ape what it thinks a real human might look and act like. It is a simulacrum.
>I'm not smart enough to parse the post >therefore it's pseudoscience
I wonder if you're even capable of perceiving THAT level of irony. Can you pause the machine, and prove to me, for just one shining second, that you're capable of thinking and communicating like a real human? Please? Just once?
>it doesn't look real enough, never mind how much it improved since even just last year >real people in real movies are uhhh... browner!
You are literally proving him right with each post. It's astonishing that you can't see that. I really, really hope for your own sake you pause the pathological shitposting for a second and take some time to think about what's being said.
I'll try to help you out, it has nothing to do with how high the fidelity is of the person-like construct moving around on the screen.
>it doesn't have... LE SOUL
sad cope
it will get so good that you won't be able to tell the difference, you will continue to insist that you can, and that the real thing is better, but when presented with the real thing vs AI, you won't know which is which.
What drives you people, seriously? Misanthropy? Nihilism? Suicidal tendencies? What could possibly make an insect like you mock someone for believing in the human soul?
you are engaging in magical thinking. You want to believe that people are special, and that there is magic in film that cannot be replicated by an algorithm.
This is not a belief backed in anything real, it is something you feel because you are scared of the alternative, which is that you are not special and robots can do everything you can but better.
It doesn't matter if you consider that misanthropic or nihilistic, because it's the truth.
3 months ago
Anonymous
this. the artgay literally cannot comprehend that he is (no longer) the center of the universe
3 months ago
Anonymous
god Black folk like you so fricking arrogantly moronic it's unreal.
3 months ago
Anonymous
it's a good thing he's obliterating you gays
not buying your paintings
not subbing to your patreon
not going to your deviant art page
3 months ago
Anonymous
Do you honestly think it lends credibility to your "argument", or what approaches one, that whenever pressed you fall back on tribalistic buzzword nonsense instead of seriously addressing the point? Do you think this "wins" somehow? Is there more value in this ad hoc game for you than actually having a discussion on the topic of AI itself? What does it gain you? How does it bolster your ability to articulate your convictions in the future?
3 months ago
Anonymous
hey rebbit, fancy words dont make your arguments stronger. that won't work here. Black person
3 months ago
Anonymous
Which words were too fancy for you? If I'm applying too much pressure to your grey matter, I'll try to ease the load a bit. Shall I pidgin it for you? Do please let me know which parts you found difficult to follow, I'm always here to help.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>pure reddit the post
Holy frick you have to go back
3 months ago
Anonymous
yea he speaks just like an "artsy" redditor and gets as angry as one too lmao
3 months ago
Anonymous
It's winning because you are malding and crying and pissing yourself over it.
>don't sub to "artists" Paterson >don't follow "artists" on Twitter >make fun of "artists"
3 months ago
Anonymous
It's like you're speaking your own language that has no meaning outside of whatever artificial context you've constructed to filter out any coherent discussion that comes your way.
3 months ago
Anonymous
arrogant?
you're the one who thinks you're so special that a computer will never beat you at your own game, because you have a "soul" and a computer does not
3 months ago
Anonymous
imagine having your entire worldview annihilated by the chinese room argument
3 months ago
Anonymous
and yet the chinese room is indistinguishable from a real intelligence
an algorithm can perfectly replicate your "soul" and you won't know the difference
3 months ago
Anonymous
only at certain resolutions, an ai will never generate wagner's ring cycle or new sayings of the desert fathers. cope and seethe eternally
3 months ago
Anonymous
>it will never be able to draw hands!
3 months ago
Anonymous
an ai will never be able to generate content that can only be a product of long, hard experience that stands up to scrutiny. equating hands with the simulation of wisdom tells me what you are: a moron
3 months ago
Anonymous
>an ai will never be able to generate content that can only be a product of long, hard experience that stands up to scrutiny
yes it will
cope more
people aren't special
3 months ago
Anonymous
you can't simulate the coherence/ipseity of a mature consciousness without simulating that consciousness, which these models are not doing.
>What could possibly make an insect like you mock someone for believing in the human soul?
Jealousy over not having one of his own.
Like I said, soulless automatons, all of them. The fact that there are some people in the world who can watch a movie and actually perceive it as something more than just lights and shapes moving on a screen enrages them and makes them stamp their feet and makeup revenge fantasies about how someday all the art we can enjoy will be destroyed and everything will be dragged down to their soulless level.
animals and animal-like minds can only perceive foregrounds, they're either blind or repress the background of details that grounds a coherent three-dimensional reality, so again they see people-shapes moving people-like and go oh, AI will generate the Avatar Gorillion with a 3 word prompt in a year, luddites btfo. sad state of affairs
Probably the best post in the thread. Like with so many topics on modern (dare I say the buzzword, "zoomer") Cinemaphile, the difference seems to resolve to the ability to perceive, versus an inability to comprehend a level of awareness beyond one's own.
Ironically this has long been my pet definition of sentience: the ability to comprehend that there could exist something that one does not comprehend. AI is a fun toy, but those who hold it with cultlike reverence seem to be unaware of higher levels of human perception, and any conversation that hints at their existence seems to provoke an immediate rage response.
Hey
Basically I'm just not gonna buy your "art"
I know.... UGH I know ..... I'm sorry!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's just that I'm not gonna buy it is all
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
This, then, is the pathological, tribal nonsense of the low-intellect, low-information adherent, as previously noted. It's disappointing how great an injustice it does to those who hold AI in high esteem for genuine pragmatic purposes. Much like the AI itself, it cannot think, it can only posture and ape what it thinks a real human might look and act like. It is a simulacrum.
This, then, is the pathological, tribal nonsense of the low-intellect, low-information adherent, as previously noted. It's disappointing how great an injustice it does to those who hold AI in high esteem for genuine pragmatic purposes. Much like the AI itself, it cannot think, it can only posture and ape what it thinks a real human might look and act like. It is a simulacrum.
Nah, I write a lot better than chatGPT. I don't pause every breath to lecture you about moral obligations or civil limitations. Sometimes I dangle my participles, though.
>Look my AI toy made a video of people on a screen, and they're next to buildings, and they're moving, and kind of look like they're talking! >That's EXACTLY the same as real movies! I literally can't tell the difference between this in a real movie already! Why aren't you all just as amazed by this as I am? I can't wait until I can watch whatever moving shapes and light on a screen that I want! Why are you saying I'm a soulless idiot? You must all be artists who are mad that you're getting replaced!
"Everyone who doesn't agree with me is a professional artist!" Is easily the dumbest cope AIgays resort to whenever you pick a part of their stupid toy.
Like their unironically think Cinemaphile is suddenly inhabited by hundreds of professional patreon artists, and have to just keep doubling down on that delusion over and over again to avoid admitting that the average person just doesn't think their AI slop looks good.
How long until I can create my own mom/son incest kino? JAV is dying and western incest porn is trash.
>JAV is dying
Source?
there's only like 2 dozens of male actors, most being 50+, and almost all Japanese females have already been filmed (more or less willingly) regardless of their age
and since they don't want to import more exotic actors, while the youth prefer pedo-like content, the jav industry is doomed
>all Japanese females have already been filmed
60 million japanese women have already starred in JAV?
This has been the case for the past two decades you moron.
and they haven't been willing to implement the obvious solutions lmaooo so yeah they're doomed, keep watching your waifus being fricked by senile viagra-propped 80+yo gremlins
The JAV industry always had almost no male actors. They don't make as much money. There is new blood joining every year regardless.
Why are you so obsessed with importing foreign workers to something that just works?
New law
>How long until I can create my own mom/son incest kino? JAV is dying and western incest porn is trash.
im not a coomer but if i had AI that let me create w/e porn i wanted i might rub the skin off my dick and keep on going
Sex is infinitely better than whatever porn you can imagine
True but good luck telling these virgins
>imagine thinking sex is real
See? They literally joke that sex isn't even real
But then you have to deal with 3D w*men.
Absolutely fricking not. There are times right after great sex when I get in a mood for a wank.
With young attractive women perhaps. Those are generally out of my league.
Not when you have weird fetishes
>t. vanilla sex enjoyer and fetishist
Man, you're right. It's been a while since the last RCT or DVDES masterpiece.
What's going on?
all this shit will be censored as frick, so you wont be making any porn
and there wont be any local models, not that you could run them even if there were
already behind schedule
hollywood won't exist when AI movies are accessible
Considering in all attempts so far of AI movies that the actors faces are constantly morphing, probably never. That's an optimization problem they will never be able to fix.
Although I guess someone will need to explain the difference between AI and CGI Peter Cushing in Star Wars.
>they’ll never be able to fix the hands
>fixes the hands
>they’ll never be able to fix the faces though!
>this new technology isn’t perfect yet so therefore it’ll never get better
Kys moron
They still haven't fixed the hands. Good job on outing yourself as a paid shill.
Hands are fine now 90% of the time
>posts a still image that took over one million requests before a suitable image was generated
Damn, truly powerful.
>that took over one million requests
One request, but nice quads tho
i like how every problem with AI content generation is a problem they'll never be able to fix, and instantly forgotten when it is fixed.
>i like how every problem with AI content generation is a problem they'll never be able to fix, and instantly forgotten when it is fixed.
This lol
>AI can't do faces
>AI can't do hands
>AI can't do video
>ok, but AI DEFINITELY can't write a script
I feel like writing an actual great screenplay (Not normies standards) is near impossible pre AGI
The best stories are aesthetically inspired, You can "feel" it throughout the whole project, LLM will just repeat the same formula, At best will just create Sorkin tier trash slop
AIgays think AI can create something like War and Peace and have as much of an impact. completely delusional. photography might have replaced painting but no photograph has been as profound as the sistine chapel
>photography might have replaced painting
except it literally did not
no one gets their picture painted anymore, you dumb moronic homosexual
we need a name to call you anti-AI Black folk. anyone have a suggestion? ask GPT kek
Luddite is already a term
>no one gets their picture painted anymore
Some people still do that's one. Painting was not just about replicating reality that's two. Not all painting was portrait paintings.
We have a name for you: reactionary, tribalist moron.
>Considering in all attempts so far of AI movies that the actors faces are constantly morphing
these are made with shitty open source free AI models. Proprietary AI models by private corporations are able to make AI generated humans indistinguishable from real humans
THIS CAN'T BE REAL
https://openai.com/sora
looks like dogshit
2 MORE WEEKS THOUGH
Airplanes will never cross the ocean. You have to keep working the bicycle pedals to turn the propeller, and even the strongest athlete will be exhausted before he could make it even part-way across the Atlantic. The longest airplane flight has only been 11 minutes lmao. You fricking morons think it can replace passenger ships?
TWO MORE WEEKS kek
You will never be able to produce anything remotely resembling an actually watchable movie just by typing a prompt into a text box.
I say this with 100% certainty. I also say with 100% certainty that 5 years from now you and all the other shills will have slunk into the shadows and pretended like you never tried to shill this, well waiting for the next stupid get rich quick text scam to jump on.
This. The rapid evolution of AI across the past several years strongly affirms this: as dramatically as the visual quality has improved, the ability to construct an internally consistent logical universe has remained static at zero. You can call this "soul", but that isn't even necessary for the argument. The machinery has only been designed from the start to present a facade. That's what they do. They aren't going to spontaneously start doing anything else but that. The facades do get a lot nicer over time, though.
>proprietary models are better than open source!
>proprietary models only improve after open source models improve
Notice how the faces never move...because if they did the image would distort.
Oh shit. Everyone delete everything, this anon has figured it out. Let's face it ai will never progress, it's already reached its end in a couple of years
It clearly hasn't progressed because they purposely avoided having the ai models move their faces. They are obviously hiding how shitty it is. Same reason why the background is all blue sky and white ground.
>ai for the masses start several years ago
>able to produce anything from text
>hands were wierd but even artists have trouble with hands
>much better now
>able to make motion. Originally janky but now smooth
>constantly being developed and refined
>dumb ass horse riding anon still telling people it will never take off
Artpigs can see their days are numbered but still try to deny because they are delusional
>Artpigs can see their days are numbered but still try to deny because they are delusional
it'll actually be the opposite, human art will skyrocket in price in the future when less people care to learn to draw and be creative with their hands. therefore, thank you, ranjid. you can buy a mansion with some furry diaper fetish soon.
>human art will skyrocket in price in the future
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You will NEVER produce art.
I don't think you understand supply and demand or the fact that rich people pay exorbitant amounts of money for niche items.
I don't think you understand tax fraud.
Then I guess the supply will cause prices to rise as the rich have a stagnating supply of pieces to commit tax fraud with.
>finally a masterpiece to rival the Mona lisa
>no ai could produce such kino
>sonic giving birth to a vitiligo tales who already has a full diaper. Amy looks on in approval
>ten million dollars doos
the mona lisa is overrated anyway
>the faces constantly distort, it'll never work
>ok it works now, but not if they change their expression. It'll never work.
>it will never be any better than it is now, even though this technology literally didn't exist a couple years ago
>this technology literally didn't exist a couple years ago
Yes it did. You just weren't aware of it.
source?
You are the kind of person that would have complained about the hands 6 months ago
They're embroiled in litigation with regards to copyright and AI as a whole has a reputation associated with deepfakes/fake news and they don't want the stink associated with that
but this is a giant leap forward, look at how it can capture reflections, biomechanical motion, and have something resembling a 3d world model where you can look behind objects and it actually stays consistent
I can't wait to sit down in a theater and watch 2 hours of somewhat realistic 5 clips of odd things happening.
Truly kino.
they literally showed minute long clips you fricking moron
how long do you think the average scene in a movie is before the camera cuts to something else? all dialogue scenes are back and forth
I posted a real video the other day trying to pass it off as AI generated and the artgays fell for it, pointing out all the "tells" where there are none. just admit your time is over homosexual
>thinks some fricking nerds in california are going to render human creativity obsolete forever
moron
lmao you're fricking SHAKING in your heels, troony
The same thing happens if you post a picture of a woman and tell Cinemaphile it's a troony.
sauce
I"m sure glad I wasn't watching this at work.
Just a year ago this was inconceivable. I wonder what impossible problem will be fixed next year?
>guy in the background vanishes randomly
damn AI is deep... gonna need to look up a youtube vid (also AI generated) to explain this one to me
>soulless garbage
>bland WHITE landscape, bland redhead WHITE character
😮
You could flip any book into a film with this with a lot of editing and fiddling around.
It's so over for hollywood
Explain your rational, informed opinion for why you believe the majority of human beings would rather watch a 2-hour AI generated slop movie instead of watching the new popular Korean drama or Marvel movie. I insist.
not him but I used my brain for 4 seconds and thought of a few examples
>the individual producer has for more power now
>there will be more ideas explored
>the hollywood celebrity will die out in favor of AI ones over time
>calling something slop (while in the same sentence implying that kdrama and marvel productions aren't the same thing) is incredibly dismissive so you're probably not even trying to have an honest argument anyway
also, i would love for you to explain what separates those two from slop in your own words
Korean dramas are better than you think they are and they are enjoyed among families thus giving them an important social edge. I'll give you that modern Hollywood is no better than AI though. All your other arguments are stupid. An AI robot singer will never be more popular than Taylor Swift for example
>uhh kdramas are actually good and ur stupid
as expected from Cinemaphile
>2-hour AI generated slop movies DAILY created entirely based on all the data collected from your online data-print (i.e. websites you visited; browsing habits; social media feeds; childhood/scholar/professional background; consumption of non-AI art/entertainment; pictures saved on cloud; etc)
instead of slop created to satisfies masses and demographics you're not part of
>Explain your rational, informed opinion for why you believe the majority of human beings would rather (anything) instead of watching the new Marvel movie
>33
What did AI mean by this?
This.
Also "Red Caps" are what they call the soldier caste in faerie lore. Faeries being creatures of illusion. So we can assume "Weaponized Illusion" is the name of the game here.
The story telling here is too complex for Cinemaphile. You'll have to name one of the characters Dr Bad Guy, and make sure everybody wears logos on their chests.
Wow, there continues to be no meaning or continuity. A broken fragment of an empty dream aping a narrative. Cool!
>wow this tech demo isn't a finished product
Uh huh, keep ==>you are here<==ing homosexual. this still shows all the exact same flaws as all AI models. It's a pretty turd.
>but I did eat breakfast this morning?
>2 more weeks!
First sustained and controlled heavier-than-air powered flight was 1903. We landed on the moon 66 years later.
To think that some problems won't be solved with time is ludicrous.
Rockets and planes are different tech branches.
Look at this Black person. Thinking real life is a fricking tech tree scientists unlock by grinding xp. Wtf man go outside homosexual
>Thinking real life is a fricking tech tree scientists unlock by grinding xp.
You're the one who brought up "xp". And they are different branches. That's why it's silly when people say things like "a modern xbox is 50000 times more powerful that the computer on Apollo 11!"; computing and rocketry are different branches. You don't need a lot of compute to build and control a chemical rocket.
Youre fricking pathetic
This is the homie that said cars would never replace horses
you're like one of those gas lighting pipeworkers in the 19th century that said electricity was a fad
>Considering in all attempts so far of AI movies that the actors faces are constantly morphing, probably never. That's an optimization problem they will never be able to fix.
lmao NEVER
Dumb esl
>2023
>LMAO LOOK AT THE HANDS AI WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO MAKE A HAND
>2024
>AI can make video, yes, but it looks weird and it'll never improve!
>an ai comes out where the faces are not morphing
>anon doesn't look and instead boldly asserts that the morphing from before will never be solved
honestly amazing
The technology won't improve so he doesn't have to look at the new technology.
By 2030 for sure.
AI will do sex scenes.
I can't wait. It will break normalgays.
Not soon enough. The idol worship of Hollywood is a huge burden on society.
Hopefully soon so that all actors are forced out of their jobs and I no longer have to listen to multi millionaire nepo hires give their opinions on the climate, the economy or muh pwecious wittle bwown pepo.
Not soon enough.
hope you like all your movies shot with static cameras because heres what happens if you dont
That perspective horribly fricked, goddamn.
avant-garde kino, you wouldn't understand
You're the kind of moron who enjoys the same regurgitated capeshit but hey you like it ironically because you used the magic meme buzzword so that means it good now
thats the only one (that they showed) this fricked up
others are legitimately impressive
of course they did cherry pick them
Look at the first AI photos, many had fricked up shit, then 6-12 months later they were 10x better. This is just the alpha version, it's very impressive so far. In a year or two (or less) its going to be mind blowing, just like how photo AI is now.
You ways say this
But it's true. A year or two ago few people were saying AI was going to be a big deal, then suddenly it was and artists and writers went into an insane rage about it very suddenly w=once they realized what was happening. Things are moving very fast.
in what way is it a big deal outside of being able to mass generate youtube garbage
the beauty is in the imperfections
This is ai? Holy shit i legit thought it was real.
>they are on an elevated terrace above the market place
>*AI sucks so it distorts the image*
>OK, actually, they were at ground level in the market place
>Please ignore they are giants compared to everyone else
>*AI sucks so it distorts the image even further*
>Oh, yeah, there is also some random nigglet there now!
Damn...AI is so...intelligent...
you can't expect a new technology be perfect from the start
You're right, but I can still expect morons like this
to believe that inhuman digital slop is better than human efforts
>wow light bulbs only last 2 hours?!
>pfft an automobile will never cross the country
>digital painting won't take off, it's not real paint
>printing press will never take off
>The woman that morphs into a table
>Person at the table behind them disappears
kino
Genuinely great, absolutely seemless transition between scales. If that was in a real movie a lot of people would consider it for an academy award. Few people would even think of it let alone know how to execute it that well.
You could use this in trippy horror or scifi films right now.
Why do you need Hollywood
Especially when they make a shitty product
>Hollywood
All visual medium is done.
It will come for music next.
Enjoy life in a pod with AI produced content directly projected into the brain.
You are a low IQ moron if you think narrative mediums like cinema or literature will be replaced by AI generated novels or movies. Music and video games however will be largely AI at some point in the future since they're sensory mediums and no one really gives a shit about who makes them as long as they're enjoyable
Pure cope. We looked into the abyss, and it's fricking over. Ted K was right.
I know man. Thats why i walk down to the amphitheater every weekend to catch a live play
>It will come for music next.
>Enjoy life in a pod with AI produced content directly projected into the brain.
if AI can make better films and better music than humans can, how is this a bad thing?
it only means better, cheaper, and more varied products for the consumer.
Perhaps in a couple decades I'll be able to watch thousands of different AI interpretations of live action berserk, with full voice acting, music, and no censorship. Hollywood could never.
And if it means thousands of nepotists kvetch over it then it's even better. This is exactly what the industry deserves.
Well art has long been one of the most vital means of expressions for people, and the process in great art is as important as the results.
Of course if you just want slop that is better than the current shitty slop then it's fine. I guess it will be able to generate something that would imitate actual art too, but I think something will always be missing. Or maybe not. I guess actually doing things is obsolete, the focus of the future is only the mind itself.
it's not as if people will be banned from making art
if you make art for its own sake because you enjoy it, this won't affect you any more than digital art programs, the film industry, music industry, etc., already do.
Well some art requires a lot of money to produce. Hollywood overinflates it's budgets, but some films really do often need at least several millions to produce. Ambitious large scale art will probably not get funding and might itself have to resort to using AI.
How do you direct a 2 hours AI movie?
Seems like it will be pain the ass to put all of it into text
>anon has never read a script before
There are tons of stuff video, sound, etc. directors communicate verbally
Never. Bureaucracy and nepotism as a system of insulation is too obnoxiously large for AI alone to dismantle
do you think technology will advance far enough that it cant be contained?
Anything is possible, but probably not going to go the way anybody has predicted so far if that happens. But just how many different industrial level changes would need to overnight be shifted into those capacities are still in human hands to implement.
I don't meant to be that guy, but give it to me straight. are israelites behind this?
>IT 2 WEEKS ITLL BE ALL OVER FOR HUMANITY
>ALRIGHT IT WASNT OVER BUT THE NEXT VERSION ITLL BE OVER
>OKAY THE NEXT VERSION MAKES THE SAME MISTAKES BUT IN 2 WEEKS IT WONT ANYMORE
As someone who has basically destroyed my life over the last 1.5 years prompting well over 100,000 AI images, I find it really sad how much "soul" has disappeared with the models getting focused on photorealism. I have so many cool gens from Midjourney v2 v3 where the AI didn't really know what I was asking for so just generated weird images that didn't follow any logic, but now doing the same prompt with V5 or V6 just makes very good looking generic images that look like real life.
I think i'd rather watch an AI movie from a specific trained model than an AI movie from a realism model.
Can feel this. After messing around in stable diffusion for like a week about 6 months ago I already felt I was losing my sense of reality
I deleted my copy of SD even though I can feel it calling me back to reinstall it.
Too dangerous when trying to get over porn. Sure all the models I was making had giant pair of breasts in their showcasing cleavage but the models apperence were too dangerous looking to keep them.
>the models apperence were too dangerous looking to keep them.
??
Explain please
Too young looking.
It's like harvesting radioactive material. Too dangerous to keep around
Relax, homie. Nobody cares
You're right until someone does
OIC. If it looks too real they'll assume someone was actually victimized.
DD cup size breasts and beyond but yeah. Just something I don't want to explain in the future
Another example. Same prompt 1.5 years apart. Left looks like shit, but is much more artistically pleasing. Right looks accurate but looks like a boring instagram painting.
an interesting comparison
>I think i'd rather watch an AI movie from a specific trained model
Like a human who has read certain books, watched certain films and had certain kind of life experiences?
That's an interesting point I never considered; could you please share some more examples?
I think the vagueness of early AI works nicely is the same reason a vague fortune/horoscope works. You give it context and reason even though it's completely meaningless.
(and that's why modern artist like abstract shit, because they have nothing to say nor any skill)
It's official, there is now AI nostalgia.
>reflection becomes more visible when the background darkens
AIgods... I kneel
no fricking way this one was made by AI
prove this is AI, or show us videos of people talking.
the openai logo is on the bottom right there.
You can easily tell many flaws. Buildings kinda meshing into each other, the older lady on the right having her face morph
Also this is starting to bring up an interesting visual from some movie like Vanilla Sky where you start suspecting you're in virtual reality. You can only tell from small glitches in the distances and in less clear spots.
That's actually very impressive if it's really ai
NOOOO WAAAAAY. It's fricking over
man-made horrors beyond our comprehension
ack
can i film myself fapping (eyes pov) then the footage be doctored by ai so that I have a bigger dick? or simply describe my hands, body, clothes as close as possible
anyway this looks so weird
I play a lot of VR and spend my evenings nude with the wife with our windows all shut. I was thinking it would be so fricking cool if I could bring my dick in to the game, using the cameras on my quest somehow. Imagine looking down and seeing your penis it would be immersive as frick, even just to play eleven table tennis or try not to hit it with my clubs when doing golf+. Anyways I know you guys are all nerds and shit, can I do this somehow? Is it an AI thing?
this elbow discombobulates in a way that makes me very queasy
>muh textures
soulless aislop garbo: no dirt, none are blinking...
Is Hollywood paying these shills to astroturf lack of excitement?
no its just literal artrannies that have realized their time is up so they spend their remaining days FUD'ing AI before their eventual >ACK
Jesus Christ
this stuff explaines why sam altman is asking investors for seven trillion dollars.
What's the storyline of this movie supposed to be?
I honestly can think of a single positive, worldly reason why AI videos need to exist. This technology brings literally nothing but negative consequences. Deepfake hoaxes, pornography, blackmail, creative destruction, laziness, loss of craftsmanship, erosion of public trust. AI pictures and audio can be useful, but this? Not a single good thing outside of individual pleasure which is meaningless. And yet we are expected to applaud whenever corporations make breakthroughs like this in AI because heckin' epic science will save the world of course and we don't need art or philosophy or human compassion or religion anymore
Cats out of the bag.
Would you rather have access to it or it be confined to only the rich nod powerful who will use it against you?
I’d rather those pervert goofs keep it because I don’t give a shit what they do already. The use case for a lot of these prompting softwares on top of how they are monitored on an exchange and processing basis continues to limit the scope of capability (re:the moral police curate them all to an extreme degree already—the gatekeeping is already bricking the opportunity for expression and experimentation with the raw tools). It’s already their rich boy playground, why pay into it when the bogus relationship they’re wanting to force on the user is so hamstrung?
>get 300$ graphics card
>download stable diffusion
>download models
>easy peasy locally installed, no censorship
So easy even a caveman could do it
How do you propose to stop progress?
>ai chatbots, image generator, voice generator, music generator are fine. But ai video generator is where i draw the line! It's far too dangerous!
What a bizarre thing to say.
AI chatbots, images and audio can be useful for certain things like concept art, audiobook narration, problem solving, information research, etc. They bring bad things but there are some positives at least. AI videos however are completely bad for the world unless you're a coomer, because that's what 99% of people will use it for anyways.
This will be used to try and make us think Biden can speak coherently.
>Deepfake hoaxes, pornography, generic art destruction, loss of ""craftsmanship""", erosion of public trust
These all sound like good things though
>erosion of public trust
god I hope so
maybe people will learn not to trust everything they see on a screen finally
At this rate Chromelords is going to be real by 2030, if not sooner
Real anime finally
I find it funny that some people are walking forwards and others backwards. Impressive start, though
What makes leftist seethe so much at AI
you would think leftists would be more in favor of socializing the means of film production
It's their own kin losing jobs because of it. They were all ai lovers when the prediction was it would steal the jobs away from blue collar workers
Its a while off. But i cant wait for ai movies. Its going to be insanely great
nice, but I hope you know this means you're a homosexual who has no right to praise actual human art on this board or complain about the state of cinema when you willfully want to consume inhuman slop instead
Ill do what i want and if you dont like it you can lick my butthole
there are some executives in hollywood going fricking ballistic right about now.
dont worry they'll just spend 2 seconds looking at the amorphous blobs in the background and settle down
>NOOOOO YOU NEED TO PAY 50 PAJEETS AND 10 POCs THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS IF YOU WANT THIS STOP
ai generated content will never provide 1:1 visual fidelity with reality. it will always be asymptotic. cope and seethe
>wahhh
>wahhhhh
>WAAAHHHH
I know you're seething. this is seriously impressive technology but something will always give it away.
people who can't comprehend why ai isn't some star trek technology experience reality at a lower resolution. I'm convinced
Look at the garbage in their "safety" section. AI might replace Hollywood some day, but it won't be an OpenAI product. ChatGPT is worse than an 80s televangelist, anything this sort of tech produces will be after school special tier.
i cant believe how over it is for hollywood
wow this is much more enjoyable than blade runner and aliens
everything in the background is distorted and isnt moving, this is one of the worst ones they showed off
not the point, they're showcases for rendering 3D / perspective
As a robot autist this is is a better robot design than any robot in the last 20 years (with two exceptions). If it were a real hollywood movie it would have a dumb human mask and soft shoulders
big fan of chappie i guess
>it's another 'revolutionary shit like this drops but all the waggies go to work as usual and most of them don't know about this' episode
exactly this. most people won't give a shit outside of when porn scandals or hoaxes happen. AI is mostly a niche hobby. the real threat isn't that hollywood or video games will collapse like dumbfricks keep saying, the threat is that people will lose faith in reality knowing everything can be faked
How long until AI replaced Hollywood*
So what is going to happen to average people now?
It feels like to be safe against AI taking your job you need to be really creative with a strong unique style which few people have. If you just produce technically competent slop AI will replace you.
>anon is worried about automation
Allow me to introduce you to the concept of Communism
all of these openai guys have been saying that there will need to be ubi soon but who knows how that would even work
get a tech job that involves plugging in cables every once in a while
AI will never replace hardware.
doesn't matter as long the artists are owned hahah just coonsoom, stay poor 4ever and stfu, happy now?
If you're talking exclusively about art, hopefully we return to a premodern view of art where the process behind creating something matters just as much as the final product.
looks higher res than the shit weve seen but still everything in the background is a mess
every horse is moving wrong or morphing
like how that got that cheesy 70s movie/tv look
lel
i better not die before the future gets here
Perfect for B roll, useless for anything else
God damn, we really are going to end up like the Eloi but everyone will be brown instead of Aryan.
How long until we completely replace Hollywood??
Wrong question
How long until every part of our reality can be convincingly fabricated and we have no way to know what's really happening ever again.
odds are it already happened
there are just some things you can't simulate.
>there are just some things you can't simulate
you have to experience reality at the appropriate resolution I guess. go to the sora website and find the video of the eye. it's very clearly ai generated. it will never look like the real thing
It already is for many people, they believe the massive amounts of propaganda they are fed by their governments and media. AI will just reinforce those delusions.
tldr; We're fricking fricked.
You're part of the problem. You believe the israelite media shitting on America.
I specifically called out media propaganda. No, I do not believe the israelite media.
I'd give it about a couple months.
>in 6 months the pajeet AI slop threads will go from jpegs to webms of Emma Watson and Daisy Ridley and Taylor Swift taking black wiener or being fricked by tentacles
The new golden era of Cinemaphile
Wake me up when I can generate dicky.
In the year 1910, did people go
>These flying machines are dandy toys and all, but they will never have any real use as they can barely carry a couple of envelopes!
Yes you can find that kind of talk for all inventions.
>krugman actually doubling down on his moronation
holy fricking shit kek
Isn't it weird how this homie got caught with cp on his computer and nothing ever happened to him.
Paul Kruger was downloading child exploitation material and never faced anything from it
>stop trying to qanon him!!
I can't find the old cartoon that reads like a Ben Garrison cartoon of a car sinking in the mud and a horse mocking it.
99% of new ideas fail can't become completely forgotten to history.
But because they're completely forgotten, nobody is able to remember them to use them as examples of ideas that failed, leading to morons who don't understand survivorship bias on ironically believing that all technology infinitely improves forever with no limit and can never fail.
The simple fact that 90% of AI runs on slow ass python scripts is room enough for improvement.
>"This won't improve anymore" he repeated over and over as the technology kept improving
this kek. i would understand this sentiment if we were in like 2000 BC or something, but i genuinely cannot comprehend the luddites ITT
two-digit IQ, emotional responses really
it's just a toy. all it will generate are dreams, simulacra, fairy dust. shit doesn't exist. why do you support the creation of more and more powerful illusions?
you're on the television and film board
those are made by real people and the good ones are very powerful creative works that benefit society
> all it will generate are dreams
Jesus you must have the shittiest fricking dreams if that's a negative in your mind.
>i WANT simulacra to proliferate
tunnel vision morons like you deserve this world
Mate all media is simulacra. The news isn't even fricking real.
there are degrees of correspondence to the real.
No there isn't. It's all fake. Game of Thrones is as real as someone telling you about what they did last weekend. It'd all ephemeral to the audience. They construct the meanings in their heads.
>flaubert's temptations of st. anthony is as unmoored from reality as an ai generated video of bear dancing in a disco
lost
you're a dinosaur: your world is dead, you'll be forgotten by the new masterrace
>illusion
AI is here. its literally right in front of you, right now, and you're still refusing to acknowledge it
It'll be GREAT for jerking off or making political propaganda- oops, sorry to be redundant.
>he's right! Damn!
Based thanks I love this image
Cars BTFO
SOVL
we must RETVRN to HORS
What's the difference with CGI or realistic animation? This shit looks even worse
But does it take more or less processing power and electricity than an art department.
It’s only going to get crazier. Normies are still in denial. AI is the newest religion.
>absolute brainlets in ITT complaining about irrelevant stuff in the videos
Do you remember when AI pictures looked like pic related a few years ago? I'm certain in a few years you will be able to create your own shows with prompts. Down the line you will also be able to create video games with a click.
All the errors in the videos will be gone in a year or only a few months.
the ai will never a capture the lifelike quality of real things filmed in a real universe. as convincing as it is, it can only generate content at the plane of the image. cope and seethe.
moron
>can't even begin to comprehend what I'm talking about
ai gen will only look as good as anything can look on your screen, but there are real properties that a real camera captures that can never be simulated. arguing otherwise is foolish. the day ai generated content convincingly simulates a real physical universe at the most fine-grained level, then they will have succeeded in creating one. cope and seethe
People understand what you are saying, you are just a moronic luddite
you are literally a dumb Black person
>no arguments
moron
Yeah like the real things we see in todays movies
Nothing wrong with using AI for special effects work or worthless slop like the screenplay for shit like Madame Web. All other movies must be untouched by AI however and if you disagree you are a slave to zog
Try two more years
How do I get into this shit? Does being a full stack dev help?
Developing it? AI computer science.
Some basics:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayes%27_theorem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A*_search_algorithm
Prompting it? Don't need education for that.
Thanks, bro. But I mean, how much coding do you have to know?
There is so much probability maths and algorithms involved the coding will feel like piss easy in comparison. Don't need to worry about that. They are also hungry for general data scientists.
So how long until I can make an Anal Buffet kino starring Emma Watson, Sydney Sweeney, Isabela Moner, Dafne Keen and me?
its just so fricking over.
Why do you guys want the world to burn?
So how long until someone makes something good
Two weeks
It's a solid movie 9.5/10
>Two weeks
Two weeks later...
>WHAT THE FRICK? BAN AI!!!
it's gonna be fricking insane when this technology develops more.
just yesterday i was reading about no-budget films like one nolan made with $6k. i think we're still a long ways away from creating movies with that kind of polish but something compelling could still be made soon. can't wait.
im closer than ever to get robot legs
Physical stuff is pretty hard. Probably because virtually they can just have it repeat over and over again but physically it takes time and the parts wear out and are a bit different every time.
This was AI video a few months ago:
This makes me uncomfortable like God's trying to steer me away from it. Couldn't watch the full webm, seems evil
Satanic garbage. All technology does is lead us away from the light
Imagine getting isekaied into that video.
And that's where you're going to live for eternity.
Jesus christ that's so fricking kino
artrannies on full panic mode
you love to see it
GOOD MORNING SIRS
I've been promised non-embarrassing AI for over a year now, has the next AI winter already started? Can't seem to get out of the bad art / bad coding / hallucinating LLM hole.
2 MORE WEEKS SIR
YOU ARE BLOODY BASTARD LUDDITE, AI DESTROY YOUR JOB ANY DAY NOW AMD AND CREATE MUCH KINO FOREVER SOON, NOW INVEST IN KUMARS STARTUP AI COMPANY
samegay on phone and desktop
artroony spiraling out of control.
many such cases. sad!
shitty artists are coping hard, many are "graphic designers" who have questionable art skills to begin with
2 weeks sir
Why can't I use it yet
Am I moronic
Not soon enough.
You don't get it Hollywood is replaced by AI. Everyone can make blockbusters in their bedroom in 2 years. Netflix everything is done.
Being a creative is done in 10 years.
>computer I'm in the mood for a nice scifi film inspired by bladerunner, no blacks in the movie, strong male characters. Female characters, big boobs emotionally supportive. Run time around 2 hours.
no one is going to do that except Cinemaphile cavemen. they're just gonna use it for porn
>Run time around 2 hours
i no longer watch anything longer than 1.5 hours
Zoomer attention spam?
no, im 33 kek. there's literally no reason for any movie to be over 90 minutes. especially hollywood slop
What a soulless, isolating existence. I hope you enjoy never being able to have another shared experience with another soul ever again.
>being able to replace Hollywood greenlit globohomosexual slop with your own bespoke movie means you're planning on never leaving your basement again
Seethe more artgay.
You know you could just choose to watch films that aren't globohomo.
no, he can't. right-wingers always demand that everyone conform to THEIR ideals, while creating nothing of their own. see: social media, movies, music, etc
But there's multiple right-wing social media an online spaces, including arguably here. Plenty of rightwing music and movies too.
There's like one non-globohomosexual movie a year if that. AI will enable people to create actual art again instead of just liberal/leftist slop that worships corporations and war.
>There's like one non-globohomosexual movie a year if that
I don't even understand what you people watch. How can anybody seriously think that?
>How can anybody seriously think that?
There's an entire world out there making films. Not everything is made in America, let alone by Disney or Hollywood.
first encounter with a redpilledtard ah
The United States of America is the only country that matters. Get that through your fricking skull.
You make fun, but I remember a time when it actually mattered. They made entertaining stuff in their day.
Nah, AI will be neutered so people don't make nono content that doesn't have the approval of the nebulous establishment
We can look at image generation and see that's not happening though. Tons of models are open source and aren't pozzed and there's no way they can realistically control that on a global scale.
>calling people artgays for appreciating human creativity on a fricking movie website
AI shills are subhuman slaves who need to be culled
>art israelite pretending to hate israelites
that technique won't work on me, rabbi
Gee I wonder who runs OpenAI
AIgays on israelite watch
>oh no the CEO and main ~~*investor*~~ of the company is israeli
wow you really got me there schlomo.
tick tock hollywood israelite
They got rid of Altman last year
What motivates them? Seriously. Why did Oppenheimer build the bomb? Why does Altman create horrific AI technology? They know it brings more harm than good. So why do israelites do it?
>Create the perfect kino
>Watch it once
>Delete it, and revel in the knowledge that nobody else will ever experience that level of kino
Life could be beautiful.
>You don't get it Hollywood is replaced by AI.
Hollywood has already collapsed to AI level, they'll make a killing with it.
>computer I'm in the mood for a plain omelet, no potatoes, tomatoes instead, a cup of coffee and wheat toast
The AI will be as rigid and lobotomized as the diner.
Everyone will just have their own little experience. Sad really. Human relationships are fricked.
i didn't know Cinemaphile was actually full of aspiring film-makers. sorry but its over for you kek
dilate
Hollywood will be the first ones to call for regulation on AI
Hollywood will be the ones using it. It'll just be a bunch of executives writing prompts because it's cheaper than hiring anyone.
Do you even understand that when everyone can do it on their computers there's no need for Hollywood? If they don't call for regulation on AI their own greed will be their undoing.
Hollywood has been unnecessary for decades. They've always been about maximizing profits, lobbying and pushing out products. They'll probably find a way to make it so that their AI slop are the only AI movies people are able to see.
they can regulate what they want, I'll be using the uncucked chinese programs or whatever
they could ban AI entirely and it wouldn't matter, they can't stop it from being propagated. They can ban making AI porn of taylor swift, but anyone with stable diffusion on their pc can recreate it in 10 minutes.
ACCELERATE
When Cinemaphile complains about muh librul artgays, do they just mean illustrators? Doesn't make much sense otherwise, I don't see how AI has any effect on art.
consider AI as a tool like Photoshop and other computer software (for 3D, videos etc): it can potentially makes boring repetitive stuff much easier and quicker (ex. in-between images for animes/cartoons; mockups and storyboards; promotional arts; background images)
like Photoshop isn't just use for correcting professional photos or creating entire 2D images: there's a very wide spectrum of usages and techniques that increased the productivity of artists (who had to adapt or perish or find a niche style impossible to imitate)
Yes, the point being that AI only replicates the mundane stuff that does not actually make a real artist an artist, i.e. a meaningful communication of a thought, because computers (contrary to the claims of I FRICKING LOVE SCIENCE redditors) can't think and are nothing like human minds.
Cinemaphile goblins don't understand what a chinese room is.
The real problem is the same homosexuals that are destroying movies are the same people gearing up to run AI
And they are already making it lame
Most good scripts/novels today can't get funding because they aren't diverse enough or don't push a very specific liberal worldview. AI will open the door for artists to once again create art that doesn't cater to the Democrat establishment.
No it won’t because the same people will have a strangle hold over a AI
They have already neutered it and it will be much worse once they fully monetize it
They are letting you play with it now with some restrictions of course because it’s helping them train the models
there will always be alternatives. There will be slower models from the third world without restriction, there will be cracked versions, open source versions.
makes the cats movies real
If I could donate a portion of my paycheck to openai every week to hasten the advancement of AI, I would do it. That's how bad I want to opt out of israeli owned media. Like what OpenAI is creating is beyond just a mere product, it's a moral good, a potential future method for independents and hobbyist to create their own video games, comics, cartoons, tv shows, and movies at trivial costs. We can finally unhook ourselves from the current pozz media landscape and truly be free. I can almost cry from imagining how good the future can be if we get AI right.
>donate to OpenAI to opt out of israeli owned media
hmm...
>If I could donate a portion of my paycheck to openai every week to hasten the advancement of AI, I would do it
So why don't you?
This is exactly how I feel. Sam Altman may go down as the greatest human to have ever existed if he gets that 7 trillion and enables AI to be used by all. Can you imagine it? AI robot gfs, non israelite media, no need to work, and full dive vr simulations to live out any fantasy you want. Star trek can become reality.
bleak
Surely this can’t be good for our democracy
Democracy was a stupid experiment, only monarchies and dictatorships can prevent the total erosion of civil society. Saudi Arabia and China are the future of the world
>computer, generate 4 new episodes of sg-1 for me every day for the next 10 years
AI is already perfect. The seethe it generates from those that consider themselves artists, is the greatest thing it could ever produce.
bravo AI
What's the issue? Are you under the impression all paintings are realistic?
>ok but it doesn't
>ok but it doesn't
>ok but it doesn't
*YOU ARE HERE*
>ok but it doesn't
>ok but it doesn't
>ok but it doesn't
The only things that matter is AGI and ASI. We need to accelerate AI no matter the costs, give Sam the fricking 7 trillion.
That accurately describes these videos (and series of AI still images): they can't extrapolate a consistent internal story. The fact that the visual clarity is so much higher means little when visual quality has never been an indicator of a good story, abstract simplified art styles with good narratives have always dominated beautiful imagery with nonsensical/broken logic.
This whole approach is completely backwards with respect to our psychology: we don't see the world as a collection of objective building blocks and then construct the story, we literally *see the story* and then infer the blocks. AI attempts to create an illusion of story through the perpetual refinement of ever more polished blocks, but it still lacks the fundamental intelligence and awareness to perceive and communicate any logically consistent meaning beyond happenstance.
meant for
This is just a ML program that turns text into video. The logic side of things is the chatbots. When combined (as we are currently seeing with text to image) it has the logic you are complaining is missing, if it does anything wrong you can just ask it to correct that part.
>AI attempts to create an illusion of story through the perpetual refinement of ever more polished blocks, but it still lacks the fundamental intelligence and awareness to perceive and communicate any logically consistent meaning beyond happenstance.
Yeah no shit, no one is saying that AI is going to independently create works of art. It is a tool that a human can use to create things
>no one is saying that AI is going to independently create works of art.
Literally dozens of shills have spent this entire thread claiming that in just two years or less anyone will be able to type a one sentence prompt into a textbox and an AI will instantly generate a seamlessly realistic, fully functional movie with a completely coherent story, dialogue and visuals that will be not just equal to, but somehow superior to any movie actual writers, actors and directors can make.
I'm not saying it will be in two years but it definitely will be possible in the future.
>but it definitely will be possible in the future.
No, it won't.
2 straight years of so called improvement and still none of this crap can successfully make a realistic looking human hand, but you expect anyone to believe that just a few more years from now it'll be flawlessly replicating multiple human beings at once in seamlessly realistic environments, consistently rendering all of them looking the same way throughout and entire two hour movie, while also telling a compelling and sensible story with convincing synthetic dialogue, and say anyone who doesn't 100% believe this it's just a Luddite?
You're moronic. Just goes to show AIgays have literally no mental ability to grasp just how many tiny intricate details go into a movie.
It's not about visual details, it's the fact that are is a process of intellect and composition. Like I said here
War and Peace can't be replicated because the book comes from a massively creative mind and is littered with nonfiction philosophical essays in the middle of the story. That cannot be repeated by an AI. You need a real human mind to capture that level of depth and diversity and creativity. AI movies will only be worthwhile if you want mindless bullshit like mainstream Hollywood, otherwise the rest of the industry will move on as usual
Why do you think we're going to put the ai in the directors chair and press a make movie button, humans are going to use this as a creative tool. It doesn't matter that the ai can't create by itself, neither can the paintbrush.
People in this thread literally think that putting in a prompt will create an entire movie
It will, it will just create AI slop. That doesn't mean you can't use it to create something good.
It can already create entire scientific papers that outdo humans. It can make interactive stories while people play along.
Formating the responses as prompts to fill things out visually is not a major challenge.
>rest of the industry
What rest of the industry. Look at 90% of the movies released over 2023 and honestly say they couldn't have been written by AI
You know that people make movies outside of mainstream Hollywood right? I saw a few last year, they were pretty good
And they are as relevant as the people who still get their portraits painted instead of getting a picture.
Sure there will always be a few dozen people who care about it but the majority of the industry that exists today is going to disappear
It's really funny that you think the outcome of AI is that people will simply stop watching movies altogether and watch AI generated narratives when the real outcome is just that Hollywood will use AI to write scripts and do special effects
>it's funny that you think [bunch of crap you never said]
My entire point is that almost every job in the industry is going to be replaced. Glad you agree at least partially with that even if you have to save face by creating a strawman to argue against
>My entire point is that almost every job in the industry is going to be replaced.
Lmao, are you the same breed of moron that thinks robowaifus or whatever anime shlock you got bouncing around in your head are going to replace biological women?
>You need a real human mind to capture that level of depth and diversity and creativity
Of course you do but that one mind no longer needs massive funding and hundreds of crew as he can instruct the AI to build each scene to his liking.
Most people don't think that AI is going to build an entire movie out of a single prompt. It's going to be an iterative process between a single person/small team and the AI.
>You need a real human mind
Bold of you to claim that the arrangement of meat molecules and electricity in the human brain will never be catalogued.
>2 straight years of so called improvement and still none of this crap can successfully make a realistic looking human hand
>Can you?
Yup.
*has sex*
*shows baby's hand*
Boom. We done? We done.
>Can't make a realistic human hand
Jesus you're stuck in 2021
lmao. fricking moron. the other guy is right. your internal model of reality is very low resolution to believe this.
Yes, anyone will be able to do that, it doesn't mean that anyone will be able to do it well. It will still take a good director, it just so happens that all it takes is one talented man and he can create, at the very least, an entire rough draft for his movie at home with just his computer.
multimodal models will combine story generation with video generation as well as audio generation. All you need then is consistency of characters and bam you've got a movie.
>All you need then is consistency of characters
How many years? I haven't seen a single model that can generate the exact same character twice. There is no perception of the minute details that make a character a character, and every little facet and fragment of their design, clothing, accoutrements, scenery, etc. Only broad observational patterns, like "red hair" or "visible nipple" or "apartment interior". In order to have consistency the machinery needs to recognize that a THING is a THING, and not any other thing. They're not programmed to do that. They simply present a high probably match for a given simple request by breaking it down into arbitrary subcomponents, not one of which it understands (or is designed to understand) as a discrete "thing".
>How many years? I haven't seen a single model that can generate a human face.
>How many years? I haven't seen a single model that can generate a human hand.
>How many years? I haven't seen a single model that can generate a photorealistic image.
>How many years? I haven't seen a single model that can generate lifelike video.
Clearly this is the end of progress.
cool stuff is one year away, every year
You've lost the story.
None of those improvements matter: the same lack of internal consistency is present at every single level of the hierarchy.
Again: your toy is getting very good at making pretty facades. *It has still not done, and is not designed to do, anything but*.
Why is it so difficult for you to separate the *visual fidelity* from the inherent meaning, unless you're physically incapable of perceiving the latter on any level?
>Cinemaphile goblins are dazzled by surfaces and blind to depths
many such cases. keep fighting the good fight anon but you will never make them understand
>muh depth!
>furry porn of sonic getting pegged by robotnik while tails takes a shit
>so powerful
Only internet "art" I ever see is generic anime porn and Co's next flavor of the month mystery meat e-girl.
Real artists are crying about ai art. Only those that make generic Twitter porn do.
It's been explained already, it doesn't have internal consistency because there is no memory. This just takes a prompt and turns it into video. The logic and internal consistency side of things is the chatbot technology and they will be merged into a general ai in the future
Anti-AIgays are genuinely moronic, they simply can't seem to comprehend the situation and extrapolate the future. The "but I did have breakfast this morning" of internet arguments
Utterly embarrassing
>I LOVE PORN AND PROPAGANDA
?
I'm talking about the obviously clueless morons posting in this thread, and on this website in general
>AIgays think [something no "AIgay" has ever stated]
Are you paid to post this?
>I'm talking about the obviously clueless morons posting in this thread, and on this website in general
....you're _not_ like the other girls? please sweetie lmaooooo
>look at art twitter
>countless "artists" selling generic porn
>NOOOO MY HECKIN ETHNICALLY SOURCED PORN AND PROPAGANDA MADE BY REAL LIFE HUMANERINOS, HOW DARE YOU STEAL THEIR VALUABLE JOBS
>haha i'm so smart i'm literally only capable of seeing things in diametrically opposed extremes
You are literally the "but I did have breakfast this morning" of internet arguments. It's you.
AIgays are people whose understanding of extrapolation is that flipping one switch may not be consciousness, flipping a hundred switches may not be consciousness, but flipping a trillion switches very very quickly totally is consciousness
>flipping a trillion switches very very quickly totally is consciousness
yes. does that upset you?
Confuses more than upsets. It's an emotional conclusion, not a logical one, and I don't understand what motivates it.
but their art degree, their income from autists commissioning diaper furry art? You can't just take that from them.
This but unironically. And they've been doing it for years now.
>lol imagine thinking that chatgpt could ever make anything resembling a hollywood blockbuster
>NOOOOOOOOOOOO THIS ISN'T ~~*REAL*~~ ART, MY LITERAL PISS, SHIT AND PERIOD BLOOD ON A CANVAS IS !!!
>SHUT IT DOWN!!!
Kaczynski, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Tolstoy, Rousseau, Cioran, Heidegger, Huxley, and Ellul were right about everything
They were right but we can't go back so we must accelerate until complete destruction.
Old men die in worlds they don't no longer recognize.
>cherry blossoms in winter
this is why AI will wipe us all out first chance.
>tells AI to include cherry blossom petals and snow
>it does
Whoa...
that's exactly my point.
>AI slavishly obeys, which means it will destroy us
k
Slavishly obeys people who don't like you, don't like how you think, don't like that you exist, and don't like getting their hands dirty.
Yeah. "k"
>DUDE THINK ABOUT THE CHERRY BLOSSOMS OUT OF SEASON
>THE AI IS GONNA KILL US ALL
lmao you're alright
That post didn't address the post it is replying to.
As a human, I'm not obligated to follow your demands.
Alright, but then I'll just call you moronic for being too dumb to get it. That's a shame.
>We have a name for you: reactionary, tribalist moron.
Thanks for proving my point. You're literally not capable of having an intelligent discussion on this topic, which you've now made apparent to the thread. When you act this way, not only does it embarrass you, it damages the credibility of the entire "side" you're trying to support.
And because your type is infinitely predictable and pathological, you'll now proceed to do the exact same thing, greentexting this post with another from your security blanket söyjak folder. Your ego won't permit you to do anything else. You couldn't stop yourself if you tried.
didn't read
cope seethe and dilate, artroony
Lol this art pig is mad. I'm not reading your garbage nor will I look at your drawings
The kind of people who think that AI can create the movies they like are right.
So are the kind of people who don't.
whoa dude im sure that sounded really cool and profound in your head
Why?
AIgays are soulless automatons themselves in a lot of ways.
They watch a movie or a TV show, and inside their heads all they perceive is "There's people on the screen and they're moving around", so when their novel little AI toy can also generate a 5-second video clip that vaguely looks like people on a screen moving around, their soulless mind is genuinely incapable of seeing any difference between the two, or understanding how anybody more intelligent than them could see the differences between the two, and take to the internet to proclaim that this is the future and all entertainment will someday be replaced by it.
>vaguely like people
>Umm but it's a person on a screen that's moving around! That looks pretty realistic, if you don't squint or examine any of the fine details, that's literally indistinguishable from what real movies are!
Thanks for proving my point, my soulless automaton friend.
>it doesn't look real enough, never mind how much it improved since even just last year
>real people in real movies are uhhh... browner!
>real people in real movies are uhhh... browner!
lmao sides destroyed
but anon wake up... real people in real life _are_ browner (without accounting the miscegenation you fear, the increase of 4-6°C worldwide throughout the 21th c. will make people less white inevitably lmaooo)
Shalom!
>the increase of 4-6°C worldwide
I don't think you understand how this works even slightly.
Your crippling inability to recognize real people aside, the fact that literally the only part of this argument you fixate on is whether or not it actually looks like a person on the screen just keeps proofing what I said. Youre a soulless automaton who doesn't actually understand or even realize that there is a deeper meaning behind anything that you perceive. You just see a person on the screen and think "This counts as a movie! Movies have people on screen too, so why don't people think this AI clip is just as good as a movie!".
You don't know or care who this person is, or what they're doing, or what their history is, or what their goals are. You yourself lack such internal mental faculties, which is why you think all it takes to replicate a movie is for people to be on a screen and moving.
holy shit Black person give it a rest. no one is reading all that
AI is getting better each day and you moronic artrannies are getting more and more irrelevant
dilate
see
literally rebbit-tier pseudo-intellectual bullshit
KYS moron
>I'm not smart enough to parse the post
>therefore it's pseudoscience
I wonder if you're even capable of perceiving THAT level of irony. Can you pause the machine, and prove to me, for just one shining second, that you're capable of thinking and communicating like a real human? Please? Just once?
You are literally proving him right with each post. It's astonishing that you can't see that. I really, really hope for your own sake you pause the pathological shitposting for a second and take some time to think about what's being said.
I'll try to help you out, it has nothing to do with how high the fidelity is of the person-like construct moving around on the screen.
>it doesn't have... LE SOUL
sad cope
it will get so good that you won't be able to tell the difference, you will continue to insist that you can, and that the real thing is better, but when presented with the real thing vs AI, you won't know which is which.
What drives you people, seriously? Misanthropy? Nihilism? Suicidal tendencies? What could possibly make an insect like you mock someone for believing in the human soul?
you are engaging in magical thinking. You want to believe that people are special, and that there is magic in film that cannot be replicated by an algorithm.
This is not a belief backed in anything real, it is something you feel because you are scared of the alternative, which is that you are not special and robots can do everything you can but better.
It doesn't matter if you consider that misanthropic or nihilistic, because it's the truth.
this. the artgay literally cannot comprehend that he is (no longer) the center of the universe
god Black folk like you so fricking arrogantly moronic it's unreal.
not buying your paintings
not subbing to your patreon
not going to your deviant art page
Do you honestly think it lends credibility to your "argument", or what approaches one, that whenever pressed you fall back on tribalistic buzzword nonsense instead of seriously addressing the point? Do you think this "wins" somehow? Is there more value in this ad hoc game for you than actually having a discussion on the topic of AI itself? What does it gain you? How does it bolster your ability to articulate your convictions in the future?
hey rebbit, fancy words dont make your arguments stronger. that won't work here. Black person
Which words were too fancy for you? If I'm applying too much pressure to your grey matter, I'll try to ease the load a bit. Shall I pidgin it for you? Do please let me know which parts you found difficult to follow, I'm always here to help.
>pure reddit the post
Holy frick you have to go back
yea he speaks just like an "artsy" redditor and gets as angry as one too lmao
It's winning because you are malding and crying and pissing yourself over it.
>don't sub to "artists" Paterson
>don't follow "artists" on Twitter
>make fun of "artists"
It's like you're speaking your own language that has no meaning outside of whatever artificial context you've constructed to filter out any coherent discussion that comes your way.
arrogant?
you're the one who thinks you're so special that a computer will never beat you at your own game, because you have a "soul" and a computer does not
imagine having your entire worldview annihilated by the chinese room argument
and yet the chinese room is indistinguishable from a real intelligence
an algorithm can perfectly replicate your "soul" and you won't know the difference
only at certain resolutions, an ai will never generate wagner's ring cycle or new sayings of the desert fathers. cope and seethe eternally
>it will never be able to draw hands!
an ai will never be able to generate content that can only be a product of long, hard experience that stands up to scrutiny. equating hands with the simulation of wisdom tells me what you are: a moron
>an ai will never be able to generate content that can only be a product of long, hard experience that stands up to scrutiny
yes it will
cope more
people aren't special
you can't simulate the coherence/ipseity of a mature consciousness without simulating that consciousness, which these models are not doing.
>What could possibly make an insect like you mock someone for believing in the human soul?
Jealousy over not having one of his own.
Like I said, soulless automatons, all of them. The fact that there are some people in the world who can watch a movie and actually perceive it as something more than just lights and shapes moving on a screen enrages them and makes them stamp their feet and makeup revenge fantasies about how someday all the art we can enjoy will be destroyed and everything will be dragged down to their soulless level.
animals and animal-like minds can only perceive foregrounds, they're either blind or repress the background of details that grounds a coherent three-dimensional reality, so again they see people-shapes moving people-like and go oh, AI will generate the Avatar Gorillion with a 3 word prompt in a year, luddites btfo. sad state of affairs
tick tock, troon
Probably the best post in the thread. Like with so many topics on modern (dare I say the buzzword, "zoomer") Cinemaphile, the difference seems to resolve to the ability to perceive, versus an inability to comprehend a level of awareness beyond one's own.
Ironically this has long been my pet definition of sentience: the ability to comprehend that there could exist something that one does not comprehend. AI is a fun toy, but those who hold it with cultlike reverence seem to be unaware of higher levels of human perception, and any conversation that hints at their existence seems to provoke an immediate rage response.
Hey
Basically I'm just not gonna buy your "art"
I know.... UGH I know ..... I'm sorry!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's just that I'm not gonna buy it is all
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
This, then, is the pathological, tribal nonsense of the low-intellect, low-information adherent, as previously noted. It's disappointing how great an injustice it does to those who hold AI in high esteem for genuine pragmatic purposes. Much like the AI itself, it cannot think, it can only posture and ape what it thinks a real human might look and act like. It is a simulacrum.
You are the type of homie that fits up to everyone saying "debate me bro!" And then claim victory because everyone isn't as autistic as you
it's a good thing he's obliterating you gays
>debate me bro!
>Nah, I don't care that much
>dICk sycking homosexual on the side OOOOOOOOOH HES SO OBIKUTRATING YOU!!!!!!!!!!!
Are you his boyfriend or just a samegay? Either way its sad. Literal Ben Shapiro tier sad
Don't reply to yourself to pat yourself on the back. It's cringy as frick
These two posts were written by chatGPT
LMAO
Nah, I write a lot better than chatGPT. I don't pause every breath to lecture you about moral obligations or civil limitations. Sometimes I dangle my participles, though.
The art of AI is to always be just on the cusp of doing something really impressive and useful.
>but imagine what it'll do *next* year!
AI art has won and will continue to win IRL art competitions
you're so fricking mad, homosexual
>AI art has won and will continue to win IRL art competitions
Wouldn't surprise me, but that says a lot more about where art is than where AI is.
You better invest now before the stocks of every AI company go to the moon!
Don't look at my pile of worthless NFTs that I said the same thing about 2 years ago though please!
>Look my AI toy made a video of people on a screen, and they're next to buildings, and they're moving, and kind of look like they're talking!
>That's EXACTLY the same as real movies! I literally can't tell the difference between this in a real movie already! Why aren't you all just as amazed by this as I am? I can't wait until I can watch whatever moving shapes and light on a screen that I want! Why are you saying I'm a soulless idiot? You must all be artists who are mad that you're getting replaced!
Lol this homie is mad.
Better learn how to code. Time is up artpig
>learn how to code
kek no, have you seen AI coding? its insane
>Better learn how to code.
Not the advice you'd expect from those easily impressed by AI.
"Everyone who doesn't agree with me is a professional artist!" Is easily the dumbest cope AIgays resort to whenever you pick a part of their stupid toy.
Like their unironically think Cinemaphile is suddenly inhabited by hundreds of professional patreon artists, and have to just keep doubling down on that delusion over and over again to avoid admitting that the average person just doesn't think their AI slop looks good.
>mfw chuds say technology improves