How many times do you have to watch this dude just slit an aide's throat for no reason before you figure out that disagreeing with him is a bad idea?
How many times do you have to watch this dude just slit an aide's throat for no reason before you figure out that disagreeing with him is a bad i...
why is he sticking his tounge out?
Its a maori war dance thing. You wouldn't get it
Because he's a twisted fricking psychopath.
zesty
It's like a boss miming BJ foreplay to an employee, implying he can abuse his position and get one from his worker if he asked. With 2 men ofc it could go either way. It's sexual harassment.
To show that he's craaaaaazy
Jared Leto homage
I don't know, but that wet sound his mouth made gave me a stiffy
He's ka-ray-zee. He tilts his head too like a spooky serial killer guy
were the Harkonnens actually moronic? How did they think it would work out if they kept killing advisors, and why even have advisors if they just kill them when they don't say what they want. I get it that they were le bad guys have to kill their own men sometimes to explain to the audience how bad they are, but c'mon. Could've had them doing something more sensible.
It's because they don't want to hear why something can't be done.
They just want it done
This is how dictatorships often work yes. Saddam did the same thing, Kim Jong Un does it.
China is a bit more careful about it but they still do it.
This is all just recent history. Look up Misc Pot for some really ghastly things.
>All the enemies of global capitalism do it
Fascinating.
>north korea has mastered the art of necromancy
Truly best Korea.
>It was real in my head
Hell, look at how the CIA treats non-compliant presidents
this shit can exist only in fiction, there would be military coup if someone started killing advisors just for fun
>this shit can exist only in fiction, there would be military coup if someone started killing advisors just for fun
the Parthian general who defeated the Romans was ordered to be tortured to death because he won too hard, the king became jealous
One Chinese proverb says: Before you put down the bow kill the dog.
Meaning that after victory you should kill the mercenaries who allowed you to win so they are not a threat to you later.
And not doing so - you can see it again in their history in 3 Kingdoms period Dong Zhuo siezes power when he is just a warlord who was called by ministers to put down rebelion. He does it and siezes power.
Later after 1911 when Chinese fought for independence and abolished emperror the one general who had biggest army decided he will restore ewmpire and named himself emperror.
So killing good generals, but dicky people, after a war wasn't that stupid idea.
>One Chinese proverb says: Before you put down the bow kill the dog.
>Meaning that after victory you should kill the mercenaries who allowed you to win so they are not a threat to you later.
>And not doing so - you can see it again in their history in 3 Kingdoms period Dong Zhuo siezes power when he is just a warlord who was called by ministers to put down rebelion. He does it and siezes power.
>Later after 1911 when Chinese fought for independence and abolished emperror the one general who had biggest army decided he will restore ewmpire and named himself emperror.
>So killing good generals, but dicky people, after a war wasn't that stupid idea.
>Meaning that after victory you should kill the mercenaries who allowed you to win so they are not a threat to you later.
>Chinese are duplicitous
Shocking.
>Meaning that after victory you should kill the mercenaries who allowed you to win so they are not a threat to you later.
Like the Carthaginians did?
That worked out great for them didn't it?
>One Chinese proverb says: Before you roast your own child alive, eat the dog
>dicky people
Your autocorrect likes that word
>were the Harkonnens actually moronic? How did they think it would work out if they kept killing advisors, and why even have advisors if they just kill them when they don't say what they want. I get it that they were le bad guys have to kill their own men sometimes to explain to the audience how bad they are, but c'mon. Could've had them doing something more sensible.
Post more failed-male bimbos, I want to jerk off.
>troony has to resort to grooming kids
It's definitely depressing and failed male but missing the bimbo part to beat off to
Reading about the French diplomat he seduced is even funnier when you realized he fricked him to convince himself he wasn't gay
>Boursicot was born in 1944. He attended boarding schools as a youth, where he engaged in multiple homosexual affairs with other students; upon graduation, Boursicot became determined to have sex with a woman for the first time, believing that institutionalized homosexuality among boarding students was merely a rite of passage.
Your statement implies the Chinese spy had sex in order to prove he wasn't gay. Stop overloading your pronouns.
Maybe if you're an ESL Any english speaker with two brain cells can tell I'm talking about the French Diplomat. "Boursicot" should be a very obvious non-chinese name too, you just suck at reading comprehension.
A native English speaker immediately realizes your statement is moronic. You use "he" to refer to two different men in the same sentence. You use five masculine pronouns in the same sentence to refer to the Chinese spy then the French diplomat then the Chinese spy then the French diplomat then the French diplomat and that's only obvious after reading the supporting quotation afterward. For all we know beforehand, the French diplomat fricked the Chinese spy in order to prove to himself that he (ie. the Chinese spy) wasn't a lesbian.
"the French diplomat he seduced" is one person, referring to Boursicot who was seduced by Shi Pei Pu. Speaking of Boursicot, his story is funnier when you learn he had sex with the chink to prove he wasn't gay. It's incredibly obvious, you're a moronic ESL. It's one thing if you don't speak the language, but don't make EFLs pump the brakes to explain every post to you, you embarrass yourself. Just lurk more.
He's right. You really should use the same pronoun to refer to two different people.
>Reading about the French diplomat he seduced is even funnier when you realized Boursicot fricked him to convince himself he wasn't gay
Fixed.
He's right but he could have been nicer to him about it when he was just trying his best to share an interesting story.
Shut up moron
Eat shit you subhuman brown homosexual.
>nstitutionalized homosexuality among boarding students
Do Europeans really?
Yes they're all gay
Shi Pee Pee Poo Poo should have wrote a book on the art of deception
>mentally ill freak immediately begins grooming the nearest child when told what a disgusting degenerate HE is.
Utterly abhorrent freaks.
>Keep going back in time until you get to a point where you can indoctrinate yourself with alphabet people propaganda without any pushback
>Five years old
Was this drawn as a parody, or played straight? Let's see
>Look up the artist
Goddamn bros this kind of hits. I hate being an ugly failed male khhv
>time loop of a troony grooming himself
This is getting weird
would
watching dunc 2 made me question why i ever liked a villeneuve movie in the first place
Go rewatch 2049
2049 is just as dumb, although credit to Denny he didn't write it. They dug up that stupid moron Fancher to, presumably to make it more of a "legit" sequel.
This is always a moronic trope. IF you keep killing the Help, the Help is eventually going to kill you,
the real downside is you're going to be stuck with servants who just got hired off the street by the actual competant staff (who want to avoid being killed and as such find ways to avoid interacting with you).
I still have no clue why this guy was in the film. He serves no purpose in the screenplay other than to be "That Guy" and arbitrarily volunteer to duel Paul, which in and of itself makes no sense because in reality there's no reason for Paul not to just murder everybody in the room that's not his mom or the Fremen.
I love you, Denny. You've made some great films. Worked with some great people. You seem like a decent guy, I hope you continue working for many years to come. Maybe stay away from writing, and distance yourself of all the morons who were with you on the set of Dune who didn't immediately tell you "Uh, Denis... this shit don't make any sense."
Baron needs to install someone. Then Thufir played them against each other due to animosity from Baron is an abusive pedo who's entrusted with raising 2 nephews. He's also used to play up Bene Gesserits' plotting through seduction and breeding their chosen bloodline. The TV series Dunc Prophesy is about BGs.
>Baron needs to install someone
You referring to Arrakis? Why not somebody who is trained to do so? All we know about Aids Elvis is that he's a psychopathic gladiator. That's literally it. He's not exactly Grand Moff Tarkin or has any discernible makings of a project leader. I hate to be that guy, no pun intended, but the whole Bene Gesserit subplot equally brings its own issues because it has approximately zero relevance in the story and makes no sense. Loregays keep telling me they're some super secret, manipulative society of witches but onscreen they're just dumb c**ts of no perceived value and I have no idea why characters like The Baron, Paul, Feyd, even Leto don't just slit their throats if and when they get uppity. Maybe it's better explained over the course or six books, maybe not. All I know is the screenplay sucks and the screenplays are being written (presumably) to retroactively explain previous instances of plot armor that otherwise made no sense at the time of writing.
Call me crazy, but the characters and visuals of these adaptations aren't exactly the greatest thing since sliced bread, and sticking around for 15+ years to see if the overarching storylines and context eventually makes sense doesn't seem worth it.
You are making the classic secondary blunder of thinking Dune is an epic space opera story about Fremen wars when Frank Herbert didn't give a shit about any of that and thought readers wanted to hear his midwit political theories and convoluted new age sex cult beliefs. Everything in the books after DUNC Part 2? It's ALL Bene Gesserit, ALL tea parties and scheming about who gets what cabinet positions. The desert raids and knife fights are OVER.
So why do people praise it as a classic piece of science-fiction literature, or is that the implied primary blunder?
Hell, I'd be fine with whatever an author or screenwriter wants to put on the page. I don't hate any of the concepts, they just have to make sense and be compelling, otherwise it's just taking the piss.
I mean you gotta have some standards and be willing to voice them, otherwise more will come. Like I said earlier, the worst people (PRODUCERS) are the ones who are too afraid to look at somebody's creation and say "What the frick, man?"
>why do people praise it as a classic piece of science-fiction literature
Star Wars as the franchise that created modern (80s+) Hollywood blockbuster = DUNC + The Hidden Fortress et. al. as its templates
Baron has slim pickings for his successor, as his body is failing. The 2 brothers are his only choices, whddya think?
No joke, does The Baron not know how to have sex? or is this one of those Bene Gesserit manipulation tactics?
he's ghey
>gays are immune to highly toxic gas being blown right in their fat fricking faces and being subsequently locked in a room with it as it immediately suffocates the completely and without question heterosexual entities also present in said room
Bravo, Denny. You can eat my hobbit hole any day.
Feyd is supposed to be the "mirror image Paul"
>Bene Gesserit breeding experiment
>skilled fighter
>prophesied to liberate an oppressed people
Shouldn't Feyd be more calm, collected and manipulative like Paul then? They're only "mirrored" in that their roles in their respective stories are just copy-pasted. So instead of having Feyd be a character and have some scenes justifying his motivation, he's just a lunatic and wants to kill Paul because he wants to be Paul, I guess? I don't get it. Is this supposed to be something clever? When Luke fights himself on Dagobah, they didn't dedicate 20+ minutes of screentime to the mirror image in his mirror universe building up an ambiguous distaste of Luke Prime.
Short, sweet, to the point, and it propelled Luke's character, who is the primary focus of the trilogy. What the frick does Feyd contribute to Paul's character/story? If anything, contextually, he's a mirror of that gay homie from outer space that Paul fought at the end of Part One. And that duel had a purpose.
bro it's a hack movie based on some sloppy sci-fi novel published 60 years ago, don't think too hard about it because Villeneuve certainly didn't
Feyd isn't really a fleshed out character in the first book. His whole deal is that he's NOT Rabban and could be the Harkonnen response to the Atreides' Paul.
How did Big Baron survive dioxis to the face?
These movies are an even bigger hackjob than than the Star War prequels or Synder's Rebel Moon, I can't believe I wasted 5 hours watching them
Feyd reminds me of the Batman skit where he doesn't know he's killing people
>well fought Atreides, ok goodnight see you tomorrow
>LISAN AL GAIB!
Critical thinking isn't a harkonnen's best suit
>Critical thinking isn't a harkonnen's best suit
I like the spacesuit that the Harkonnens' space suits that they use on Arrakis