Mate they can ban hardware but not software especially if there's an insane demand for it. Governments can crack down on the former because you have to get it from a handful of well known suppliers, you can't just DIY it yourself and even on the rare occasion you could the IQ filter is so high that no one except maybe a dozen people will do it, none of which will be able to create enough good quality shit for there to be a viable black market for it. Latest microchips are out of the question but insulin? You can make that in your bedroom.
Software is really just information, as long as the internet exists, the government can't actually do shit about it except make it annoying for really low IQ normies who won't do shit with it.
[...]
Finally
[...]
Studios have organised manpower with experience. They'll probably initially use it to create boilerplate content and then use their experts to fine tune the product. It'll just speed up the animation and VFX process which is desperately needed for this industry. Instead of working 60 hour weeks they'll work 30 hour weeks thanks to AI. Software engineers like myself experienced similar things even before copilot became a thing.
[...]
The issue will be creativity. All the animation/videos in the world already exist. We won't see anything we haven't seen already. Good writing, compelling plots and good pacing will still be the things that carry shows and films but now you'll potentially open the door for some tech bros to infiltrate Hollywood and give it the high IQ autism it so desperately needs.
You have no idea how insanely difficult it is to get eyeballs on your films right NOW, whether they are features, shorts or documentaries. There's tens of thousands of feature films made every year, hundreds of thousands of short films. Sundance alone got ~8000 feature film and ~12 000 short film submissions this year. And you're not just competing with professional, multi-million productions, no, you're competing with video games, audio books, Tiktok, Instagram, Twitter, Tinder, X, Kick etc.
This is all happening during a time when making a film of any kind still takes some effort. Sure, equipment is cheap and easier to use than in the past, but you still need to write or find a good script, you need to hire and wrangle people who know how to act/shoot/light/record and mix sound/edit/color/whatever, you need to feed them, you need to find and hire locations, you need to do millions of things and the required amount of effort is a barrier that keeps billions of people from even trying.
AI will change that. Suddenly everyone who has access to a computer or even a smartphone will be able to create their own films that are indistinguishable from professional productions. How do you stand out from the white noise of millions and millions of AI-generated films? How do you get people to watch your own films? What is the point of making films if nobody watches them?
Mate they can ban hardware but not software especially if there's an insane demand for it. Governments can crack down on the former because you have to get it from a handful of well known suppliers, you can't just DIY it yourself and even on the rare occasion you could the IQ filter is so high that no one except maybe a dozen people will do it, none of which will be able to create enough good quality shit for there to be a viable black market for it. Latest microchips are out of the question but insulin? You can make that in your bedroom.
Software is really just information, as long as the internet exists, the government can't actually do shit about it except make it annoying for really low IQ normies who won't do shit with it.
>more variety >more creative >cheaper since you don't have to pay moronic actors
kino is coming back
Studios have organised manpower with experience. They'll probably initially use it to create boilerplate content and then use their experts to fine tune the product. It'll just speed up the animation and VFX process which is desperately needed for this industry. Instead of working 60 hour weeks they'll work 30 hour weeks thanks to AI. Software engineers like myself experienced similar things even before copilot became a thing.
Any remotely original idea created with this will be copied 1 to 1 and done to death. There will be barely any distinction between masters and novices
The issue will be creativity. All the animation/videos in the world already exist. We won't see anything we haven't seen already. Good writing, compelling plots and good pacing will still be the things that carry shows and films but now you'll potentially open the door for some tech bros to infiltrate Hollywood and give it the high IQ autism it so desperately needs.
Ai will work more than 30 hours per week, I assure you. No technology every allows people to relax more. It allows them to work more. That won't change.
Not if the devs are blatantly political, they won't.
If you really wanted to twist the knife as an AI dev, you'd paint your competitors as being right-wing
remember when they said the recording industry was finished because anybody could record their own music with a laptop and put in online ? or when they said everybody would be making feature films with iphones ? Nothing is going to happen since AI will be very costly and the only people who will be able to afford it will be the movie studios.
>ed because anybody could record their own music with a laptop and put in online ? or when they said everybody would be making feature films with iphones ?
in theory it should've been like that, but people recoil at indie stuff. they want it from hollywood, they want it from influencers, they want it from word of mouth. they will never move on their own.
>or when they said everybody would be making feature films with iphones?
Nonsense compassion, in terms of filmmaking iphone is just another camera. Iphone can't write you a script, hire actors, replace lack of technical knowledge, generate special effects. Now you can get all of that with AI.
>phone can't write you a script, hire actors, replace lack of technical knowledge, generate special effects. Now you can get all of that with AI.
Okay, then go do it right now
>There will be AI incorporated into the workflow while people keep their jobs.
A lot of people will lose their jobs because the current industry will now have a theoretical output will dwarf the demand for their services. Its no different than if you made a machine that makes shoes cheap enough to toss away rather than fix resulting in cobblers being fired. Someone still has to operate the machine but the amount of people needed for that isn't the same as the amount as before.
Once again, you don't know how companies work. You're giving this fantasy scenario when it doesn't reflect reality.
AI is free to use by anybody. It's not restrictive, all you need is an account to use it most of the time. The technology is there and it's been hyped up.
Where are the firings? You would think companies would be getting ahead of the curve and replacing their workers to get ahead of the competition. Just accept that your AI fantasy land will never come true
>You would think companies would be getting ahead of the curve and replacing their workers to get ahead of the competition
except companies are doing exactly that, that's why live actors and voice actors were protesting recently, because companies are already trying to copy their likeness to use and replace with ai
You're taking about a very specific industry and a very specific problem with background actors
>Where are the firings?
There's a shitload of firings in tech right now. Even companies that are doing fairly well are laying people off. There's also a lot of companies just closing down entirely because they can't compete. Its fine if you want to live in a bubble where "nothing ever happens" but AI tech is exploding right now and lots of companies are investing heavily into that and cutting superfluous workforce so they can pour as much money as they possible can into this.
>There's a shitload of firings in tech right now.
Name the main companies and roles, I'll wait
>Name the main companies and roles, I'll wait
Google, Meta, Microsoft all laid of thousands of people each last month. Microsoft fired mostly people in their gaming sector which is one of the biggest media sectors around today and one of the most likely to be impacted by AI generation tools.
I know this probably comes as a shock to you since you're living under a rock or something but things are actually moving quite fast right now.
3 months ago
Anonymous
I KNEW a moron like you would bring up the gaming layoffs. That was due to all the acquisitions and restructuring that comes with acquisitions. As for the other companies you mentioned I guarantee those also weren't due to AI.
Don't just make shit up and actually do like 5 minutes of research. You can also just ask chatgpt
3 months ago
Anonymous
>You can also just ask chatgpt
Nah, I think you're more fun.
>Where are the firings?
There's a shitload of firings in tech right now. Even companies that are doing fairly well are laying people off. There's also a lot of companies just closing down entirely because they can't compete. Its fine if you want to live in a bubble where "nothing ever happens" but AI tech is exploding right now and lots of companies are investing heavily into that and cutting superfluous workforce so they can pour as much money as they possible can into this.
The meta right now is to be the FIRST AI tech company that can corner the market in creating on-demand content. Whoever does that first will be the Microsoft/Google/Apple/Netflix of the entire field for who knows how long. Of course there will be competition but if they play it right they can keep the first mover advantage and even buy out all the other companies as they grow.
>Get replaced by AI >Go back to school or apprentice in other industry to learn new skill >In six months, AI has been trained to do those skills 80% as good as a human reducing staffing needs proportionally >graduate training program two years later with heaps of debt and no marketable skills
The problem is people can't adapt fast enough to the changes.
It's the highly cognitive and artistic tasks that are being replaced. Accountants are going to lose their jobs while cleaning ladies make bank.
Low IQ people need actual jobs or they will become criminals. UBI won't prevent this.
Maybe that's the real point of the apple virtual goggles, to put the dregs in a virtual prison where they belong.
I firmly believe that in the future most human workers will be anti-fraud agents, security guards to prevent vandalism, or do manual tasks requiring lots of dexterity. Basically just a worse version of now.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>put the dregs in a virtual prison where they belong.
What's the point over just killing them? Fed contracts with Apple?
3 months ago
Anonymous
>do manual tasks requiring lots of dexterity
Life isn't a video game, moron
>in terms of filmmaking iphone is just another camera
Before reaching the level of cameras that everyone has in their pockets right now having access to a studio level camera was definitely a big deal. We do get some quality work from people who otherwise would not have access to that type of tech but most of it ends up going towards creator platforms like youtube, chaturbate and onlyfans. They are able to cut out many of the middle men in the production process as well. Almost daily here there are discussions about how ho chicks don't need to suck hollywood dick anymore since they can get rich sitting at home is they really put their minds to it
>Nothing is going to happen since AI will be very costly and the only people who will be able to afford it will be the movie studios.
This is the thing right now. This models are very censored and open source models are way way behind.
but let's say the movie industry see's what's coming and buys big into video a.i intending to 'own' it and guide it's use. This pisses off the writer guild and the actors so strike again
this future is going to be wild. You're going to be able to watch a show, see the ending is shit and then ask the AI to fix the ending so it's not shit. You will be able to recast every character in a movie. This is insane.
>see the ending is shit and then ask the AI to fix the ending so it's not shit.
People watch movies and make movies to satisfy different urges, and this satisfies neither of them.
And you will realize your ideas are shit. You'll feel no more satisfaction in the future then you do now when you imagine things in your head. You'll go right back to suckling slop from the teat of corporations while they pump out regurgitated slop mass produced by third world proompters and use their mass resources to market it enough to stand out from the hellscape of derivative tripe that every other moron has flooded the internet with. And you'll be happy.
This is true. Even for all the slop already on the market, the fact that even those people had the wherewithal to get their message out there shows they had something to say. Most people who had to sit around and wait for their slop generator to come around and do the work for them had no real message that they cared enough about to bother sharing. Even promptgays know this, and is why all of their generations which border on anything of value are always "in the style of [so and so]"
>Even promptgays know this, and is why all of their generations which border on anything of value are always "in the style of [so and so]"
pssst anon all your favorite artists stole from somebody else. yes, even that one.
And yet they still managed to create something unique enough that even room temp IQ promptgays can recognize the combinations of elements which are particular to their personal style.
A full episode of AI will cost thousands of dollars. A normal guy won't be able to do it, but I could see some anons putting together a team and through patreon creating live action kinos of Berserk or Conan.
>A full episode of AI will cost thousands of dollars.
No it won't. They are already making smartphones with built-in Ai generation and it's expected that desktop computers with the same tech will be rolled out within a couple of years. The price of gfx cards is the big stopper right now but nvidia is already making cheaper cards now with higher specs.
The actual stopper is what
>ed because anybody could record their own music with a laptop and put in online ? or when they said everybody would be making feature films with iphones ?
in theory it should've been like that, but people recoil at indie stuff. they want it from hollywood, they want it from influencers, they want it from word of mouth. they will never move on their own.
said. There' a ton of things consumers can do even now but no one really cares unless it's a popular person or brand spoonfeeding it to the masses
AI is just a tool like any other, e.g. a guitar. 99% of people will play Smells Like Teen Spirit or Wonderwall. The 1% with talent and vision will create magic.
what is it with AI that you can tell immediately it's fake? is it soul? I can't point a finger to it but there's a feeling AI exudes that makes it a dead giveaway. it just doesn't feel right.
Because it looks like garbage. >Two people at the foreground are giants compared to everyone and everything else >Other people just randomly vanish after walking through stuff >Fake lighting
It's just gross and uncanny. You can tell that it isn't modifying and arranging things that naturally exists but trying to "CREATE" things from nothing, looking at things that actually exist but aping and replicating them in a way that's different from how real humans perceive things. Even at its most "realistic" it has no way of knowing what's "good" and so it always ends up being subconsciously nauseating.
Because it looks like garbage. >Two people at the foreground are giants compared to everyone and everything else >Other people just randomly vanish after walking through stuff >Fake lighting
this logic is invalid in the court of law. if theres a inquisition that needs proving its AI fakery it needs to be scientific and repeatable. feelings just doesn't cut it.
It's not gonna come down to law it's gonna come down to the fact of no one wanting to watch AI shit that makes them feel indescribably queasy and uncomfortable.
>It's just gross and uncanny. You can tell that it isn't modifying and arranging things that naturally exists but trying to "CREATE" things from nothing, looking at things that actually exist but aping and replicating them in a way that's different from how real humans perceive things. Even at its most "realistic" it has no way of knowing what's "good" and so it always ends up being subconsciously nauseating.
I am having a hard time trying to decide if you are a woman or a soiboy. What is the cause of your gayottness?
There's no market for garbage made with AI so it won't be used in the way people fear it will be used. Will most likely be a tool or for reference.
>But with this technology we don't NEED studios!
AIgays have been saying this forever, it's not happening
It's just gross and uncanny. You can tell that it isn't modifying and arranging things that naturally exists but trying to "CREATE" things from nothing, looking at things that actually exist but aping and replicating them in a way that's different from how real humans perceive things. Even at its most "realistic" it has no way of knowing what's "good" and so it always ends up being subconsciously nauseating.
Airplanes will never cross the ocean. You have to keep working the bicycle pedals to turn the propeller, and even the strongest athlete will be exhausted before he could make it even part-way across the Atlantic. The longest airplane flight has only been 11 minutes lmao. You fricking morons think it can replace passenger ships?
Remember all the memes and amazing kino that came from DALL-e? Oh right the only thing it made was almost being taken off the internet by virtually raping some talentless bimbo awesome.
everything looks smoothed especially skin as if it were airbrushed. This is probably something that can be solved.
AI generators have a sort of auto-training to remove certain imperfections. That gets pushed even further depending on the user prompt. AI models trained for proper realism don't look like that but the anons that are into that stuff don't hang out on Cinemaphile much
Because it looks like garbage. >Two people at the foreground are giants compared to everyone and everything else >Other people just randomly vanish after walking through stuff >Fake lighting
It's just gross and uncanny. You can tell that it isn't modifying and arranging things that naturally exists but trying to "CREATE" things from nothing, looking at things that actually exist but aping and replicating them in a way that's different from how real humans perceive things. Even at its most "realistic" it has no way of knowing what's "good" and so it always ends up being subconsciously nauseating.
everything looks smoothed especially skin as if it were airbrushed. This is probably something that can be solved.
Cat posters really are worthless subhumans, most of the cat memes you love have been edited by AI
You prove my point, those who hate AI unironically love and save pics made with AI, cat homosexuals being one of them, they think their cat memes on reddit are 100% totally real cat pictures
>The human doesn't get jokes. Autism detected. >Human isn't aware that cat memes are a Cinemaphile thing. Seethes about "reddit". >"newbie" moniker added. >Upload familiar soothing image sedate and redirect.
Carry on, newbie.
You do know that "AI" just copy pasted a bunch of real sanics to make that picture, also you can clearly see the head is completely disjointed from the body as it models based on sections to be able to achieve the "sanic holding a dildo in his hand while he goes fast to rape a techbro in his anus" prompts
>Prompt: Badly drawn Sonic as if it was drew by a child >UMMMM AKSCHUALLY YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE IT'S AI BECAUSE IT'S BADLY DRAWN, LOOK THE HEAD IS COMPLETELY DISJOINTED FROM THE BODY!
Months ago I read it on Cinemaphile that in the near future (digital) artists/anti-AI mobs will devour themselves cuz they will keep accusing everyone who made mistakes in their art that its AI, slowly discouraging any newcomers. >LOOK THE HANDS AREN'T PERFECT, CLEARLY IT'S AI
First they came for the generic anime girl artists and I did not speak up...
3 months ago
Anonymous
im a shitposter, first and foremost, but i gotta say i had a real giggle when someone was trying to shittalk a.i by referring to his particular favorite smutt commissioner and me finding out out that that said smutt artist actually had a model available made so you could just generate that particular artists styles smutt for free
There are two people who want AI to take over: >Upper middle class/rich people who won't be affected by the loss of jobs, and thus the loss of upward financial and social mobility >Coomers who don't care about anything and just want to sit with VR goggles on all day and jerk off to their wildest fantasies brought to life
3 months ago
Anonymous
FRICK I fricked up the greentext brb killing myself
it is entirely up to the artist, a good one can give it soul even if its stick figures. a bad one will make soulless stuff like all the pixar productions.
You can't. Just like you can't tell when something it's VFX in a movie.
If you can notice it's because it was done by a moron or the studio didn't put much effort into it. It doesn't have anything to do with the tool, but the execution and talent.
The amount of people that currently make CGI content is quite large, its about to become a lot less because the companies that can use these tools effectively will be able to churn out content faster than ever.
>It's already replacing artists
Name me one respectable company that has replaced their artists with AI. You can't. Get off twitter, moron
Once again AIgays go back to the artists argument when AI is being incorporated into literally ever single industry. I can tell instantly that when you start talking about artists you don't actually have a job or know how companies work.
There will not be a "mass replacement" like you basement dwellers hope for so you can collect your UBI. There will be AI incorporated into the workflow while people keep their jobs. Any mature working adult knows how these industries work.
>There will be AI incorporated into the workflow while people keep their jobs.
A lot of people will lose their jobs because the current industry will now have a theoretical output will dwarf the demand for their services. Its no different than if you made a machine that makes shoes cheap enough to toss away rather than fix resulting in cobblers being fired. Someone still has to operate the machine but the amount of people needed for that isn't the same as the amount as before.
They sperg out because these things are literally stealing all of their work online to make these abominations consisting of 1000's of individual works moronic homosexuals jerk off to.
>stealing all of their work online
So? These same people probably cheered when they lost people their jobs because it hurt their feelings, just look at shit like F1 girls being removed because feminists screeched about sexism and objectifying them, the F1 girls didn't care and liked their easy job, now they don't have it. Twitter artists were a major cause for things like that and other jobs deemed as sexist
>It's already replacing artists
that literally has never happened. digital artists were being whiny crybabies but none of them actually lost their jobs or businesses.
If you want AI to finally be regulated just have ChatGPT run for office and win in some podunk town (you know, like one of those towns that elects a cat), and watch the meltdowns that will result from the precedent.
The amount of people that currently make CGI content is quite large, its about to become a lot less because the companies that can use these tools effectively will be able to churn out content faster than ever.
I can't even fathom the mindset of a person that stubbornly lives in the past/present and refuses to consider or even conceptualize future events. Truly a low-IQ existence.
To ignore the rate of this tech massively leaping forward and improving before your very eyes means you literally have shit for brains.
China will probably lag behind for a while due to various embargos on them. Even if they can get the hardware needed, its through various smuggling methods that for example India don't have to deal with but India still has to deal with the US simply having unlimited cash.
China is already winning >On Sunday, a report from the South China Morning Post revealed a significant financial loss suffered by a multinational company's Hong Kong office, amounting to HK$200 million (US$25.6 million), due to a sophisticated scam involving deepfake technology. >The scam featured a digitally recreated version of the company's chief financial officer, along with other employees, who appeared in a video conference call instructing an employee to transfer funds.
I hope that they give people access to start playing around with it, but the entire space is pretty much obsolete if this is legit. like who is going to want to deal in midjourney or shit like runway.
I hope that they give people access to start playing around with it, but the entire space is pretty much obsolete if this is legit. like who is going to want to deal in midjourney or shit like runway.
This (independent production, not necessarily AI) is already happening right now in media like comic books and video games, and the masses prefer the products from big studios. Why would text-to-kino be any different
Yeah, this is what I don't get about the >AI is about to KILL Hollywood
boosterism. People barely support independent artists as is; Hollywood types can use this just as easily as you can, but they can also
a) promote the stuff *they're* generating with it at a VASTLY larger scale
b) hire people who are good at making things with it and get them into contracts
As much as the writers who were striking mostly suck, I'm willing to bet it's better than the creative output of these studios being even MORE centered on executive whims.
this model will never ever leak to the public and we will never be able to own GPUs that can generate from that model anyway. if we get access to the AI its gonna be all neutered and crippled and censored and limited. Studios can rent it out for $150,000 a month or something insane like that. Zero chance, zero that any of us will get to play with these.
Nonsense. Actually running models is way less demanding than it is to train them. You could absolutely run these video models on second hand A100 that you can get for a few grand right now. Sure that's a lot of money just for computer hardware but its still cheap enough that a lot of people can just buy it on a credit card and just generate away.
The fact that someone has reached this goal means its possible and only motivates people to try and do the same. There's plenty of open source AI shit out there.
Jobs are changing you crybaby. Yes millions of jobs are expected to change but overall the expected outcome is millions of new jobs. It's mostly the people that sit on their hands and cry instead learning how to use the new technology that will lose their jobs entirely and not know what to do
>millions of new jobs
....maybe
iirc goldman sachs predicted an ultimate 7% employment contraction in their march (iirc) paper when gpt4 first popped up (but also predicted that those jobs would be replaced by unknown means, and that those replacements would pay less)
also, and this is important to note, those new jobs are likely to demand higher skill, as automating boiler plate procedures removes low skill work > removes low skill workers/raises the skill floor, and despite what memes say, people ARE limited by means beyond their control and we are ALREADY in an environment of increasing education demands that requires people to stay in school longer and longer, REMINDER real wages for non college degree holders have only diminished since the 70s, and bachelor's degrees are propped up by few high performing degrees like petroleum engineering, and not everyone can do difficult STEM
I'll admit, historically industrial revolutions have raised general wages, but for the first time we are getting closer to replacing general intelligence, and as time progresses the IQ requirements to make a decent living are just gonna increase
The prediction is 85M jobs lost but 97M new ones created. The reality that most companies are shooting for is called work augmentation. 40% of the workload for each job is meant to be augmented by AI. That means money going into training existing employees to adapt to that. Luddites will have a problem and get kicked to the curb. Companies that already have slim margins will probably downsize and straight up give jobs to AI.
There will be other new jobs though, like those created due to robotics (infrastructure, maintenance, etc)
These "new jobs" will be 1/8th-time $5000 for the year jobs with zero job security. The world is already approaching that shit, this is only going to make it worse for everyone.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Elites don't give a frick. They'll be in their guarded compounds while the rest of us pick fights at restaurants trying to get hired.
thats not goldman sachs, but I appreciate the video
but I do have some reservations >most of those jobs mentioned can theoretically be replaced with mere LLMs (talent acquisition, marketing manager, customer success specialist) >conveniently doesn't mention that, historically, those who transition/retool/re-skill/are replaced and find other work: end up having their real wages lowered >shifts the burden of reskilling to the government
Also, and this is just my anecdotal opinion. Anyone that has tried to find a job knows that companies loathe to train, so I find that 70% dubious in practice
lmao. You really think the skill floor being lowered will allow you to get a job if you just learn the new technology? The whole point is making it usable for literally anyone. You know who else will be learning that technology? Millions of third worlders willing to work for literal pennies.
Artgays already have it bad enough when skilled turdworlders have long been willing to draw, paint, and 3D model things with more uniqueness than your average AI output for literal slave wages. Now imagine countless waves of people with the same worthless local currency gaining access to tools which allow them to do the same thing but with next to no skill requirement.
There's going to be nothing left to really strive for except fictional entertainment for ourselves alone; all the rich people currently rich and their families will be rich forever. Everybody else is locked down to their current class starting right now.
You're never going to replace: >Elevator technicians >Firefighters >Police officers >Intercity truck drivers (long distance is likely out within 20 years)
etc.
i'm a project manager employed by a boomer that hates technology. as long as he is alive i'm fine
All of that will inevitably be replaced. Saying ANYTHING won't inevitably be replaced is cope. It will eventually happen. AI evolves faster and faster every year. Humanity, as biological organisms, cannot compete with it. This is provable and inarguable. But you may cope and seethe as you see fit.
Anon I don't know how many houses you've worked underneath but until they invent a robot with the deft dexterity of the average human you will need HVAC people, plumbers, etc. I don't know how many roads you've driven on, but you will be unable to get an AI to drive properly on a non-grid road like many in the cities near me.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>th-they will never make a robot with the dexterity of a man, they just won't because... WELL THEY JUST WON'T, OKAY!? I DON'T CARE THAT TECHNOLOGY IS CONSTANTLY IMPROVING WHILE HUMANS ARE STAGNANT, THEY WILL NEVER BEAT US AT <insert this one specific technical thing I personally am investing in>
You're going to be forced to face reality one way or another. They'll probably have robots doing everything by the time you're an old man. If not, then they will in successive generations after you die. It is inevitable. And it isn't a bad thing either, there's no reason for you to seethe about it. The only issue is that it opens up the question for the elites about what to do with all the moronic useless golem servants they no longer need. Before the elites are inevitably wiped out and replaced, themselves. Since they will be human and thus inferior. No human is going to be able to keep up with AI.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>WELL THEY JUST WON'T, OKAY
It's more like they can't my friend. Again, how many houses have you worked underneath? How many roads have you driven on? >And it isn't a bad thing either
There's nothing left to strive for except masturbatory satisfaction with fictional films we'll be able to create.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>they can't create a machine that moves like a human because... WELL THEY JUST CAN'T, OKAY!?
Kek... oookay buddy. Again, your myopic ass will be forced to face reality one way or another. Maybe then you can put on a VR headset and live in your own cope reality. Either way there really isn't much else to say. Live in your fantasy land if you wish, not my problem at all. The world is full of delusional people who lack vision, you're just one more.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Again, how many houses have you worked underneath? How many roads have you driven on?
You're never going to replace: >Elevator technicians >Firefighters >Police officers >Intercity truck drivers (long distance is likely out within 20 years)
etc.
And now all of those fields will be overflooded with desperate people looking to take them for less pay, completely destroying their overall value.
It's over. Neo-feudalism is here.
Oh absolutely. It's never been more over. Like I said, everybody is pretty much locked right now to their class, and the rich are going to stay rich forever now.
My friend had a job as an architect at an office ran by an old guy. When he died his wife just closed shop with no severance or even pay for last month. Shit does happen.
you guys are so focused on artists you don’t even realize that shit like customer service will be the first to go, that’s already being replaced by bots. Once they can reason and listen it’s over for those wagies. Same with medical shit tbh
Because I can work to attain a new car, or something else I'd like to enjoy that can enrich my life. When everybody's out of work, nobody can do those things anymore. >But we'll have VR
Yeah and it isn't real. How you guys don't see this as fricking awful is alien to me. It's not the poor artists, it's not the poor cashiers, it's the poor everyone.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Because I can work to attain a new car, or something else I'd like to enjoy that can enrich my life
wow thats cool. something that a million engineers worked on to produce, without a single second of your input. you gonna make it your personality? >yeah but it isnt real
see above.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Hmm thats nice and all but i fail to see how providing input or not is relevant on how those things can enrich your life.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Waste of dubs. >wow thats cool.
With you so far. >something that a million engineers worked on to produce, without a single second of your input
Still with you. >you gonna make it your personality?
?????? Who said anything about making a car my personality? It's about it enriching my life. You DO own a car, right? You DO enjoy driving to places with a loved one, right? The more this goes on the more I suspect the only people okay with this are people who haven't really lived a life.
3 months ago
Anonymous
well so whats your personality then
3 months ago
Anonymous
What's the relevance of that to what we're talking about? Also pic related is literally me if it matters.
3 months ago
Anonymous
look its funny and i would of done the same, but it basically agrees with my argument
3 months ago
Anonymous
I'm not sure what your argument is. I don't need to have had a hand in making a car I purchase for it to mean anything to me. The car will not become my personality, it will be a way to enrich my life and share it with loved ones or friends.
3 months ago
Anonymous
sorry anon, ive got lost steam on this random internet shitpost. id go into detail about how using others hardwork to enrich yourself is yadda yadda but im probably going to go to bed right now. hope this helps
3 months ago
Anonymous
It really didn't help make anything about what you're saying more coherent but I hope you have a good sleep.
3 months ago
Anonymous
you too, man. shitposting aside, i hope all of you have a really good rest
3 months ago
Anonymous
>it's interfering with my consumerism!
brainlet
3 months ago
Anonymous
It's interfering with everybody's ability to rise above their current economic standing and social standing.
3 months ago
Anonymous
It's taking everyone towards post scarcity in terms of digital media. The next step will be physical content
3 months ago
Anonymous
>It's taking everyone towards post scarcity in terms of digital media
You cannot imagine how much I didn't care scarcity in digital media. There are enough films released in the last century to last me my entire life, let alone video games and BOOKS. This isn't even close to my concern, my concern is what I already said: >It's interfering with everybody's ability to rise above their current economic standing and social standing.
Maybe you're upper middle class and you don't give a frick.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>my my my >talks about the global economy
Your arguing about your personal concerns while trying to present them as a global issue to get someone to care. Post scarcity isn't just about what kinos you or anyone else have available to watch, dumdum
3 months ago
Anonymous
>my my my >Your arguing about your personal concerns
Yes. My personal concerns concern the privilege of being about to advance my economic and social standing which is being eroded as we speak. >talks about the global economy
No I didn't. I don't care about Russia or whatever the frick global economy means in this instance. >Post scarcity isn't just about what kinos
"Post scarcity in terms of digital media" is what I was responding to.
Before the end of the decade we will reach that point at which images and reality will be indistinguishable. People will either spend their lives plugged in, or leave the Internet behind. Barring other external factors, this will not be that explosive.
>People will either spend their lives plugged in, or leave the Internet behind
I don't think it'll be that extreme. You literally can't leave the internet behind because jobs depend on it. However things like tiktok and fricking news outlets will see sharp dropoffs because you won't be able to believe fricking anything anymore before the decade's out.
>millions of new jobs
....maybe
iirc goldman sachs predicted an ultimate 7% employment contraction in their march (iirc) paper when gpt4 first popped up (but also predicted that those jobs would be replaced by unknown means, and that those replacements would pay less)
also, and this is important to note, those new jobs are likely to demand higher skill, as automating boiler plate procedures removes low skill work > removes low skill workers/raises the skill floor, and despite what memes say, people ARE limited by means beyond their control and we are ALREADY in an environment of increasing education demands that requires people to stay in school longer and longer, REMINDER real wages for non college degree holders have only diminished since the 70s, and bachelor's degrees are propped up by few high performing degrees like petroleum engineering, and not everyone can do difficult STEM
I'll admit, historically industrial revolutions have raised general wages, but for the first time we are getting closer to replacing general intelligence, and as time progresses the IQ requirements to make a decent living are just gonna increase
It's unironically over. These days are the best days we'll ever have.
>Sora, make a High school movie that’s 6 hours long set in the late 00s with me as the main character but I’m the based alpha Chad and frick every woman
The implications of this technology are very interesting.
I think we're going to enter an age where what we accept as "reality" is only what we personally see and experience and everything else is questioned or flat out disregarded. Those who are already prone to rejecting facts will only be pushed farther into their own "truths" and many more people will join them as it becomes impossible to trust anything you don't witness personally.
Also art is going to become all about good ideas and how to get AI to output them rather than technical skills. This, theoretically, is great, but we'll have to see how much freedom they allow the average person in creating whatever they want.
[...]
You have no idea how insanely difficult it is to get eyeballs on your films right NOW, whether they are features, shorts or documentaries. There's tens of thousands of feature films made every year, hundreds of thousands of short films. Sundance alone got ~8000 feature film and ~12 000 short film submissions this year. And you're not just competing with professional, multi-million productions, no, you're competing with video games, audio books, Tiktok, Instagram, Twitter, Tinder, X, Kick etc.
This is all happening during a time when making a film of any kind still takes some effort. Sure, equipment is cheap and easier to use than in the past, but you still need to write or find a good script, you need to hire and wrangle people who know how to act/shoot/light/record and mix sound/edit/color/whatever, you need to feed them, you need to find and hire locations, you need to do millions of things and the required amount of effort is a barrier that keeps billions of people from even trying.
AI will change that. Suddenly everyone who has access to a computer or even a smartphone will be able to create their own films that are indistinguishable from professional productions. How do you stand out from the white noise of millions and millions of AI-generated films? How do you get people to watch your own films? What is the point of making films if nobody watches them?
Things are going to get more local and insular for sure, a biiig rise in local events showcasing your film.
Think of what will happen when everyone is like that. No one will bother making news, you'll be completely ignorant of anything happening outside of your immediate area. We truly are marching straight into feudalism again.
>actually thinks this is great
True goy mindset. It's not gonna be what you think like have you learned nothing by now. If it was truly great for us they would of never rolled it out. Do guys still not see the bigger picture. The actual point of all of this technological development and progression.
Since photoshop was invented i've been so lost then the computers started making movies and i just couldn't tell anymore so i stopped going to the cinema. Today people just assume that what they see on their screen isn't real by default but i remember when there were real movies god damnit.
When I was a kid I had this fantasy of a robot who would just make games or movies out of whatever I wanted, then when I grew up I was like "That's so crazy and childish, there's no way that could ever happen in my lifetime"
Please God please accelerate. I want it all now, tomorrow afternoon the latest
AR, VR, CBDCs, social credit, unskippable ads IRL, quantum computing, unmaned auto-organized media platforms, "digital persons", drone cops, robot gfs, AI politicians and celebrities, the complete destruction of human creativity and the collapse of reality... Make Baudrillard's nightmare realer than real.
Frick it all to hell.
Look at this. This is a real photo of a dog looking silly. We'll be able to make millions just like it, but it'll be fake and I won't care to see any of those millions.
imagine simping for AIslop...
It's a bunch of buttholes who don't know the value of life.
This is goyslop. Imagine what the Pentagon has. Regardless of specific technology, the media fog has killed reality. It's already happened my dude, everything's fake
in less than a year AI videos will be perfect and nobody will be able to tell what is real anymore.
Won't happen.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Won't happen.
I don't think you know just how over it is.
3 months ago
Anonymous
you're like a pleb at the birth of cinema grumpy anon
I know more about ""AI"" than you and I can assure you that nothing world-altering is going to happen in the next five years.
Screencap this.
3 months ago
Anonymous
ok i will mr grumpy poo because you could never see all 4 horses legs off the ground, what a rubbish technology. screenshot ting now anon prepare to eat my ass in the next 6 months
3 months ago
Anonymous
automobile? lol what rubbish. screenshot right now you'll never replace horses
3 months ago
Anonymous
Six months? I'll give you six years anon. If you lose you get to eat your own shit on camera.
>HURRR DURRR NO ONE EVER WOULD MISTAKE AI SLOP FOR REAL LIFE
People unironically believed that some Arma3 gameplay is real war footage of an ukrainian fighter pilot. The game is 10 years old
Schindlers List but there's a random chance every 30 seconds that Benny Hill chases all the female prisoners around with the music. If it's an important scene, it can happen in the background
The Last Unicorn but they're all slugs and hassidic israelites. Three black children learn the value of stealing. A man on a space station learns over many months to drink his own piss. Four guys just fricking up a truck gone wrong. mexicans winning farting (30 seconds, Dreamworks style)
I want to see M*A*S*H but they're all having a really good time and the Army is winning so they make 8mm Dance films because there's no injured people because we're doing so well. Hawkeye buys heroin for the first time
There has never been a need for immigration, especially in the last 24 years. The last 24 years of immigration policy has been the greatest failure of all western nations.
I expect a bunch of articles about how racist incels are using AI to whitewash media.
Articles probably generated by AI themselves, honk
You misspelled color correction
>people walking into lilbox on the pavement
Cute.
>more variety
>more creative
>cheaper since you don't have to pay moronic actors
kino is coming back
You have no idea how insanely difficult it is to get eyeballs on your films right NOW, whether they are features, shorts or documentaries. There's tens of thousands of feature films made every year, hundreds of thousands of short films. Sundance alone got ~8000 feature film and ~12 000 short film submissions this year. And you're not just competing with professional, multi-million productions, no, you're competing with video games, audio books, Tiktok, Instagram, Twitter, Tinder, X, Kick etc.
This is all happening during a time when making a film of any kind still takes some effort. Sure, equipment is cheap and easier to use than in the past, but you still need to write or find a good script, you need to hire and wrangle people who know how to act/shoot/light/record and mix sound/edit/color/whatever, you need to feed them, you need to find and hire locations, you need to do millions of things and the required amount of effort is a barrier that keeps billions of people from even trying.
AI will change that. Suddenly everyone who has access to a computer or even a smartphone will be able to create their own films that are indistinguishable from professional productions. How do you stand out from the white noise of millions and millions of AI-generated films? How do you get people to watch your own films? What is the point of making films if nobody watches them?
>What is the point of making films if nobody watches them?
This is what separates the artist from the ~~*((film industry*~~))
by making it way too expensive to access. hollywood can afford $50,000 a month can you?
someone will make it for cheaper
and then someone will make it open source
And then they will ban it
they ban lots of things
Mate they can ban hardware but not software especially if there's an insane demand for it. Governments can crack down on the former because you have to get it from a handful of well known suppliers, you can't just DIY it yourself and even on the rare occasion you could the IQ filter is so high that no one except maybe a dozen people will do it, none of which will be able to create enough good quality shit for there to be a viable black market for it. Latest microchips are out of the question but insulin? You can make that in your bedroom.
Software is really just information, as long as the internet exists, the government can't actually do shit about it except make it annoying for really low IQ normies who won't do shit with it.
Finally
Studios have organised manpower with experience. They'll probably initially use it to create boilerplate content and then use their experts to fine tune the product. It'll just speed up the animation and VFX process which is desperately needed for this industry. Instead of working 60 hour weeks they'll work 30 hour weeks thanks to AI. Software engineers like myself experienced similar things even before copilot became a thing.
The issue will be creativity. All the animation/videos in the world already exist. We won't see anything we haven't seen already. Good writing, compelling plots and good pacing will still be the things that carry shows and films but now you'll potentially open the door for some tech bros to infiltrate Hollywood and give it the high IQ autism it so desperately needs.
Ai will work more than 30 hours per week, I assure you. No technology every allows people to relax more. It allows them to work more. That won't change.
Not if the devs are blatantly political, they won't.
If you really wanted to twist the knife as an AI dev, you'd paint your competitors as being right-wing
You're dumb. AI takes a lot of computation. That's why you get a limited number of tokens
anon, I can tell you know nothing about the subject. Please refrain from giving anymore shitty opinions and calling others dumb.
How long until the holodecks become real?
They already are with Apple Vision AR.
Alicia Keyes was shaking her ass and singing to me in the apple store.
yuck
remember when they said the recording industry was finished because anybody could record their own music with a laptop and put in online ? or when they said everybody would be making feature films with iphones ? Nothing is going to happen since AI will be very costly and the only people who will be able to afford it will be the movie studios.
>ed because anybody could record their own music with a laptop and put in online ? or when they said everybody would be making feature films with iphones ?
in theory it should've been like that, but people recoil at indie stuff. they want it from hollywood, they want it from influencers, they want it from word of mouth. they will never move on their own.
>or when they said everybody would be making feature films with iphones?
Nonsense compassion, in terms of filmmaking iphone is just another camera. Iphone can't write you a script, hire actors, replace lack of technical knowledge, generate special effects. Now you can get all of that with AI.
>phone can't write you a script, hire actors, replace lack of technical knowledge, generate special effects. Now you can get all of that with AI.
Okay, then go do it right now
Once again, you don't know how companies work. You're giving this fantasy scenario when it doesn't reflect reality.
AI is free to use by anybody. It's not restrictive, all you need is an account to use it most of the time. The technology is there and it's been hyped up.
Where are the firings? You would think companies would be getting ahead of the curve and replacing their workers to get ahead of the competition. Just accept that your AI fantasy land will never come true
>You would think companies would be getting ahead of the curve and replacing their workers to get ahead of the competition
except companies are doing exactly that, that's why live actors and voice actors were protesting recently, because companies are already trying to copy their likeness to use and replace with ai
You're taking about a very specific industry and a very specific problem with background actors
>There's a shitload of firings in tech right now.
Name the main companies and roles, I'll wait
>Name the main companies and roles, I'll wait
Google, Meta, Microsoft all laid of thousands of people each last month. Microsoft fired mostly people in their gaming sector which is one of the biggest media sectors around today and one of the most likely to be impacted by AI generation tools.
I know this probably comes as a shock to you since you're living under a rock or something but things are actually moving quite fast right now.
I KNEW a moron like you would bring up the gaming layoffs. That was due to all the acquisitions and restructuring that comes with acquisitions. As for the other companies you mentioned I guarantee those also weren't due to AI.
Don't just make shit up and actually do like 5 minutes of research. You can also just ask chatgpt
>You can also just ask chatgpt
Nah, I think you're more fun.
Thank you for conceding the argument
Thank you for conceding my argument.
>Where are the firings?
There's a shitload of firings in tech right now. Even companies that are doing fairly well are laying people off. There's also a lot of companies just closing down entirely because they can't compete. Its fine if you want to live in a bubble where "nothing ever happens" but AI tech is exploding right now and lots of companies are investing heavily into that and cutting superfluous workforce so they can pour as much money as they possible can into this.
This.
The meta right now is to be the FIRST AI tech company that can corner the market in creating on-demand content. Whoever does that first will be the Microsoft/Google/Apple/Netflix of the entire field for who knows how long. Of course there will be competition but if they play it right they can keep the first mover advantage and even buy out all the other companies as they grow.
>Get replaced by AI
>Go back to school or apprentice in other industry to learn new skill
>In six months, AI has been trained to do those skills 80% as good as a human reducing staffing needs proportionally
>graduate training program two years later with heaps of debt and no marketable skills
The problem is people can't adapt fast enough to the changes.
It's the highly cognitive and artistic tasks that are being replaced. Accountants are going to lose their jobs while cleaning ladies make bank.
I mean it is why they are killing all of us, but they should give us UBI meanwhile.
Low IQ people need actual jobs or they will become criminals. UBI won't prevent this.
Maybe that's the real point of the apple virtual goggles, to put the dregs in a virtual prison where they belong.
I firmly believe that in the future most human workers will be anti-fraud agents, security guards to prevent vandalism, or do manual tasks requiring lots of dexterity. Basically just a worse version of now.
>put the dregs in a virtual prison where they belong.
What's the point over just killing them? Fed contracts with Apple?
>do manual tasks requiring lots of dexterity
Life isn't a video game, moron
>in terms of filmmaking iphone is just another camera
Before reaching the level of cameras that everyone has in their pockets right now having access to a studio level camera was definitely a big deal. We do get some quality work from people who otherwise would not have access to that type of tech but most of it ends up going towards creator platforms like youtube, chaturbate and onlyfans. They are able to cut out many of the middle men in the production process as well. Almost daily here there are discussions about how ho chicks don't need to suck hollywood dick anymore since they can get rich sitting at home is they really put their minds to it
>Nonsense compassion
Phone posters wont even let people love each other. Seethe more
>Nothing is going to happen since AI will be very costly and the only people who will be able to afford it will be the movie studios.
This is the thing right now. This models are very censored and open source models are way way behind.
the music industry IS dead
but let's say the movie industry see's what's coming and buys big into video a.i intending to 'own' it and guide it's use. This pisses off the writer guild and the actors so strike again
this future is going to be wild. You're going to be able to watch a show, see the ending is shit and then ask the AI to fix the ending so it's not shit. You will be able to recast every character in a movie. This is insane.
When will we get the first Taylor Swift gangbang video?
they're online bc you could put a digital face on video a long time ago
called deepfake brainiac
I feel like no one truly grasps the implications of this.
>AI creates personalized kino based on your google search history
>it's all seinfeld characters placed into kinos you love.
>Now I can have everything cater to ME ME ME
I find it fricking hilarious that you're using troony arguments
why does everything have to be about trannies?
>see the ending is shit and then ask the AI to fix the ending so it's not shit.
People watch movies and make movies to satisfy different urges, and this satisfies neither of them.
No, we're going to get a market flooded by complete trash because indians exist on this planet with us
>bing. make the star wars sequels not shit. also, rey is fully nude.
Eventually AI will be able to reanimate the end of the Kalos League and voice generation AI will be used to dub it. The future is now.
Are you excited to eat the bugs too!
Scrubs but everyone is wearing lingerie
And you will realize your ideas are shit. You'll feel no more satisfaction in the future then you do now when you imagine things in your head. You'll go right back to suckling slop from the teat of corporations while they pump out regurgitated slop mass produced by third world proompters and use their mass resources to market it enough to stand out from the hellscape of derivative tripe that every other moron has flooded the internet with. And you'll be happy.
This is true. Even for all the slop already on the market, the fact that even those people had the wherewithal to get their message out there shows they had something to say. Most people who had to sit around and wait for their slop generator to come around and do the work for them had no real message that they cared enough about to bother sharing. Even promptgays know this, and is why all of their generations which border on anything of value are always "in the style of [so and so]"
>Even promptgays know this, and is why all of their generations which border on anything of value are always "in the style of [so and so]"
pssst anon all your favorite artists stole from somebody else. yes, even that one.
And yet they still managed to create something unique enough that even room temp IQ promptgays can recognize the combinations of elements which are particular to their personal style.
A full episode of AI will cost thousands of dollars. A normal guy won't be able to do it, but I could see some anons putting together a team and through patreon creating live action kinos of Berserk or Conan.
>A full episode of AI will cost thousands of dollars.
No it won't. They are already making smartphones with built-in Ai generation and it's expected that desktop computers with the same tech will be rolled out within a couple of years. The price of gfx cards is the big stopper right now but nvidia is already making cheaper cards now with higher specs.
The actual stopper is what
said. There' a ton of things consumers can do even now but no one really cares unless it's a popular person or brand spoonfeeding it to the masses
Any day now tablets will replace desktops.
Any remotely original idea created with this will be copied 1 to 1 and done to death. There will be barely any distinction between masters and novices
AI is just a tool like any other, e.g. a guitar. 99% of people will play Smells Like Teen Spirit or Wonderwall. The 1% with talent and vision will create magic.
>xe thinks you can "master" ai
its all novice sloppa moron
what is it with AI that you can tell immediately it's fake? is it soul? I can't point a finger to it but there's a feeling AI exudes that makes it a dead giveaway. it just doesn't feel right.
>OF COURSE I DO NOT WANT GARBAGE BACK
the irishman hasn't aged well
Could HBO really not afford to buy some vegetables for this scene?
I heard they're not willing to pick up a spilled rotting garbage so they opted for CGI
Why is it moving? Is it The Blob?
The Gabagool*
Because it looks like garbage.
>Two people at the foreground are giants compared to everyone and everything else
>Other people just randomly vanish after walking through stuff
>Fake lighting
It's just gross and uncanny. You can tell that it isn't modifying and arranging things that naturally exists but trying to "CREATE" things from nothing, looking at things that actually exist but aping and replicating them in a way that's different from how real humans perceive things. Even at its most "realistic" it has no way of knowing what's "good" and so it always ends up being subconsciously nauseating.
this logic is invalid in the court of law. if theres a inquisition that needs proving its AI fakery it needs to be scientific and repeatable. feelings just doesn't cut it.
>feelings just doesn't cut it.
>courts are just and don't make decisions off of emotion or outside pressure all the time
lol
It's not gonna come down to law it's gonna come down to the fact of no one wanting to watch AI shit that makes them feel indescribably queasy and uncomfortable.
>It's just gross and uncanny. You can tell that it isn't modifying and arranging things that naturally exists but trying to "CREATE" things from nothing, looking at things that actually exist but aping and replicating them in a way that's different from how real humans perceive things. Even at its most "realistic" it has no way of knowing what's "good" and so it always ends up being subconsciously nauseating.
I am having a hard time trying to decide if you are a woman or a soiboy. What is the cause of your gayottness?
Airplanes will never cross the ocean. You have to keep working the bicycle pedals to turn the propeller, and even the strongest athlete will be exhausted before he could make it even part-way across the Atlantic. The longest airplane flight has only been 11 minutes lmao. You fricking morons think it can replace passenger ships?
TWO MORE WEEKS kek
Boring non-argument but good job typing shit 1 million people have already said and contributing nothing
Same to you.
shows the stupidity of midwits, even when revolutionary shit is staring them right in the face they deny its potential like a bunch of NPC zombies
they lack vision
Remember all the memes and amazing kino that came from DALL-e? Oh right the only thing it made was almost being taken off the internet by virtually raping some talentless bimbo awesome.
>Oh right the only thing it made was almost being taken off the internet by virtually raping some talentless bimbo awesome.
Cope
I'll be able to make my dream WH40k movie starring myself.
It's been 70 years.
A 1 year old can identify a cat with 100% certainty.
A computer will always frick up instances of identifying a cat.
weird how AI is always just one year away from doing something impressive and useful, isn't it?
Anon go check any DALL-E thread on Cinemaphile. A year ago none of the models were able to do hands. This is a fight you're not going to win.
Pull your head out of your ass
everything looks smoothed especially skin as if it were airbrushed. This is probably something that can be solved.
AI generators have a sort of auto-training to remove certain imperfections. That gets pushed even further depending on the user prompt. AI models trained for proper realism don't look like that but the anons that are into that stuff don't hang out on Cinemaphile much
Cat posters really are worthless subhumans, most of the cat memes you love have been edited by AI
Dial 8, human.
You prove my point, those who hate AI unironically love and save pics made with AI, cat homosexuals being one of them, they think their cat memes on reddit are 100% totally real cat pictures
>You prove my point
>The human doesn't get jokes. Autism detected.
>Human isn't aware that cat memes are a Cinemaphile thing. Seethes about "reddit".
>"newbie" moniker added.
>Upload familiar soothing image sedate and redirect.
Carry on, newbie.
Cope
You do know that "AI" just copy pasted a bunch of real sanics to make that picture, also you can clearly see the head is completely disjointed from the body as it models based on sections to be able to achieve the "sanic holding a dildo in his hand while he goes fast to rape a techbro in his anus" prompts
how do you draw sonic without copying him
By not taking sections of sanic and pressing cntrl+c and cntrl+v a million times. If all you have for an argument is semantics then LMAO
im not arguing pls sir relax
>Prompt: Badly drawn Sonic as if it was drew by a child
>UMMMM AKSCHUALLY YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE IT'S AI BECAUSE IT'S BADLY DRAWN, LOOK THE HEAD IS COMPLETELY DISJOINTED FROM THE BODY!
Months ago I read it on Cinemaphile that in the near future (digital) artists/anti-AI mobs will devour themselves cuz they will keep accusing everyone who made mistakes in their art that its AI, slowly discouraging any newcomers.
>LOOK THE HANDS AREN'T PERFECT, CLEARLY IT'S AI
generic anime girl artists have it bad nowadays
First they came for the generic anime girl artists and I did not speak up...
im a shitposter, first and foremost, but i gotta say i had a real giggle when someone was trying to shittalk a.i by referring to his particular favorite smutt commissioner and me finding out out that that said smutt artist actually had a model available made so you could just generate that particular artists styles smutt for free
coooooope
Why do you want AI to take over so bad?
There are two people who want AI to take over: >Upper middle class/rich people who won't be affected by the loss of jobs, and thus the loss of upward financial and social mobility
>Coomers who don't care about anything and just want to sit with VR goggles on all day and jerk off to their wildest fantasies brought to life
FRICK I fricked up the greentext brb killing myself
it's just a fact that within a few years it will be completely indistinguishable from photography. i don't "want" anything about that, but it's a fact
Lol you clearly have an agenda
what exactly gave you that impression, you moron?
Look at you getting mad. Still just stating facts? No. You have some emotional investment in it for some reason
meds
cope and seethe
dilate
ywnbaw
is a mix of knowing how bad things gonna get and how hollow it's
it is entirely up to the artist, a good one can give it soul even if its stick figures. a bad one will make soulless stuff like all the pixar productions.
depends on the style, photorealism always looks too clean and uses the same depth of field effect
You just get used to the noise pattern if you look at a lot of examples, but you cant with fresh eye.
woof that's frightening.
As always looks uncanny and like shit
Cope. Those are real.
Nothing real about ai generated shit.
You can't. Just like you can't tell when something it's VFX in a movie.
If you can notice it's because it was done by a moron or the studio didn't put much effort into it. It doesn't have anything to do with the tool, but the execution and talent.
There's no market for garbage made with AI so it won't be used in the way people fear it will be used. Will most likely be a tool or for reference.
>But with this technology we don't NEED studios!
AIgays have been saying this forever, it's not happening
You won't even notice when AI replaces CGI, you'll assume the pajeets finally figured out how to make good animation.
Your post has literally nothing to do with my post. All AIgays talk about is how fast people will get replaced, probably because they're neet losers
It's already replacing artists as they sperg out and demand their governments ban AI art
>It's already replacing artists
Name me one respectable company that has replaced their artists with AI. You can't. Get off twitter, moron
Once again AIgays go back to the artists argument when AI is being incorporated into literally ever single industry. I can tell instantly that when you start talking about artists you don't actually have a job or know how companies work.
There will not be a "mass replacement" like you basement dwellers hope for so you can collect your UBI. There will be AI incorporated into the workflow while people keep their jobs. Any mature working adult knows how these industries work.
Come back and argue with me when you're employed
>There will be AI incorporated into the workflow while people keep their jobs.
A lot of people will lose their jobs because the current industry will now have a theoretical output will dwarf the demand for their services. Its no different than if you made a machine that makes shoes cheap enough to toss away rather than fix resulting in cobblers being fired. Someone still has to operate the machine but the amount of people needed for that isn't the same as the amount as before.
>n-no i meant it has to completely take over everything
moron
>moving the goalpost and false flagging
typical midwit rethoric
They sperg out because these things are literally stealing all of their work online to make these abominations consisting of 1000's of individual works moronic homosexuals jerk off to.
>stealing all of their work online
So? These same people probably cheered when they lost people their jobs because it hurt their feelings, just look at shit like F1 girls being removed because feminists screeched about sexism and objectifying them, the F1 girls didn't care and liked their easy job, now they don't have it. Twitter artists were a major cause for things like that and other jobs deemed as sexist
>It's already replacing artists
that literally has never happened. digital artists were being whiny crybabies but none of them actually lost their jobs or businesses.
that's the flashy part, but i wonder if AI will end up replacing more the middle manager types, basically anyone who can't really create or implement
If you want AI to finally be regulated just have ChatGPT run for office and win in some podunk town (you know, like one of those towns that elects a cat), and watch the meltdowns that will result from the precedent.
The amount of people that currently make CGI content is quite large, its about to become a lot less because the companies that can use these tools effectively will be able to churn out content faster than ever.
That looks like shit though.
GOOD MORNING SIRS
I can't even fathom the mindset of a person that stubbornly lives in the past/present and refuses to consider or even conceptualize future events. Truly a low-IQ existence.
To ignore the rate of this tech massively leaping forward and improving before your very eyes means you literally have shit for brains.
Just wait for China or India to hack and clone this tech
China will probably lag behind for a while due to various embargos on them. Even if they can get the hardware needed, its through various smuggling methods that for example India don't have to deal with but India still has to deal with the US simply having unlimited cash.
China is already winning
>On Sunday, a report from the South China Morning Post revealed a significant financial loss suffered by a multinational company's Hong Kong office, amounting to HK$200 million (US$25.6 million), due to a sophisticated scam involving deepfake technology.
>The scam featured a digitally recreated version of the company's chief financial officer, along with other employees, who appeared in a video conference call instructing an employee to transfer funds.
>China
>Hong Kong
5 bing chilling has been deposited on your balance sir
>reddit humor
go back
Only a true artist will be able to put fish on rice. No robot will ever be able to replicate this craft.
>that last video
I'M READY FOR THE AI FUTURE!
this is like five years ahead of what we have right now in ai video tools.
it exists right now tho
I hope that they give people access to start playing around with it, but the entire space is pretty much obsolete if this is legit. like who is going to want to deal in midjourney or shit like runway.
well there is PIKA and videopoet but they are only creating short videos a couple of seconds long and not as convincing
Look at the new tools Adobe is putting out
they won't. they can't. this is the end.
hmmmm yes, i'm starting to see the value of this technology
kys freak
nah
>b-but I was cross dressing for the lulz and views
>actually mentally ill all along
I knew this guy was a homosexual when he insisted he's only doing it for donos. you just don't cross dress for fun.
Think of all the poor H1B 3D "artists" who will lose their jobs.
This (independent production, not necessarily AI) is already happening right now in media like comic books and video games, and the masses prefer the products from big studios. Why would text-to-kino be any different
Yeah, this is what I don't get about the
>AI is about to KILL Hollywood
boosterism. People barely support independent artists as is; Hollywood types can use this just as easily as you can, but they can also
a) promote the stuff *they're* generating with it at a VASTLY larger scale
b) hire people who are good at making things with it and get them into contracts
As much as the writers who were striking mostly suck, I'm willing to bet it's better than the creative output of these studios being even MORE centered on executive whims.
The takeover has begun
this model will never ever leak to the public and we will never be able to own GPUs that can generate from that model anyway. if we get access to the AI its gonna be all neutered and crippled and censored and limited. Studios can rent it out for $150,000 a month or something insane like that. Zero chance, zero that any of us will get to play with these.
Literally what people said about computers in the 80s kek
Anon how can you be so dumb
Nonsense. Actually running models is way less demanding than it is to train them. You could absolutely run these video models on second hand A100 that you can get for a few grand right now. Sure that's a lot of money just for computer hardware but its still cheap enough that a lot of people can just buy it on a credit card and just generate away.
The fact that someone has reached this goal means its possible and only motivates people to try and do the same. There's plenty of open source AI shit out there.
If you fed an AI all the works of art up until before Picasso would it invent cubism?
You have a human centric view of what art should be. Maybe the A.I. would invent something better. It is not like humans do anything ideally.
So what, the computer is going to appreciate the art too? There's got to be a human element in there.
You have to go above human level, maybe there are new ways to experience art
You're gonna have to be able to re-interpret how you see the world with this tech, huh?
behold the power of revolutionary AI
unironically the most kino shit I've seen all week
Someone get Graham Hanwiener on the phone, we found the secret energy chanting method of the ancient Egyptians.
no thats a real video
some spoopy ass shit
still better than madame web
Fricking scary.
Yep that's kinoué
Holy shit can you make porn with this?
No reason why you couldn't but the company hasn't made the model public yet, just shown some demos of it working and not working.
I remember hearing how making those stupid AI images used an insane amount of energy and processing power, how much worse will this be?
There are already AI actors showing up on IMDB
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm15120250/
about to open an entire AI personhood can of worms
It's unironically for capitalism. We're heading into neo-feudalism now.
Will we live to see the Butlerian Jihad?
gonna flood every corner of the internet with AI generated CP
Can't you guys just enjoy it without being homosexuals about it
What's there to enjoy about this? Everybody's going to be out of a job, we'll all be manual laborers/low skilled workers.
Jobs are changing you crybaby. Yes millions of jobs are expected to change but overall the expected outcome is millions of new jobs. It's mostly the people that sit on their hands and cry instead learning how to use the new technology that will lose their jobs entirely and not know what to do
>millions of new jobs
....maybe
iirc goldman sachs predicted an ultimate 7% employment contraction in their march (iirc) paper when gpt4 first popped up (but also predicted that those jobs would be replaced by unknown means, and that those replacements would pay less)
also, and this is important to note, those new jobs are likely to demand higher skill, as automating boiler plate procedures removes low skill work > removes low skill workers/raises the skill floor, and despite what memes say, people ARE limited by means beyond their control and we are ALREADY in an environment of increasing education demands that requires people to stay in school longer and longer, REMINDER real wages for non college degree holders have only diminished since the 70s, and bachelor's degrees are propped up by few high performing degrees like petroleum engineering, and not everyone can do difficult STEM
I'll admit, historically industrial revolutions have raised general wages, but for the first time we are getting closer to replacing general intelligence, and as time progresses the IQ requirements to make a decent living are just gonna increase
The prediction is 85M jobs lost but 97M new ones created. The reality that most companies are shooting for is called work augmentation. 40% of the workload for each job is meant to be augmented by AI. That means money going into training existing employees to adapt to that. Luddites will have a problem and get kicked to the curb. Companies that already have slim margins will probably downsize and straight up give jobs to AI.
There will be other new jobs though, like those created due to robotics (infrastructure, maintenance, etc)
These "new jobs" will be 1/8th-time $5000 for the year jobs with zero job security. The world is already approaching that shit, this is only going to make it worse for everyone.
Elites don't give a frick. They'll be in their guarded compounds while the rest of us pick fights at restaurants trying to get hired.
thats not goldman sachs, but I appreciate the video
but I do have some reservations
>most of those jobs mentioned can theoretically be replaced with mere LLMs (talent acquisition, marketing manager, customer success specialist)
>conveniently doesn't mention that, historically, those who transition/retool/re-skill/are replaced and find other work: end up having their real wages lowered
>shifts the burden of reskilling to the government
Also, and this is just my anecdotal opinion. Anyone that has tried to find a job knows that companies loathe to train, so I find that 70% dubious in practice
Hey perfect timing! With israelites causing inflation and everything, we better kill millions of jobs. Oh wait, I mean ~~*change*~~
lmao. You really think the skill floor being lowered will allow you to get a job if you just learn the new technology? The whole point is making it usable for literally anyone. You know who else will be learning that technology? Millions of third worlders willing to work for literal pennies.
Artgays already have it bad enough when skilled turdworlders have long been willing to draw, paint, and 3D model things with more uniqueness than your average AI output for literal slave wages. Now imagine countless waves of people with the same worthless local currency gaining access to tools which allow them to do the same thing but with next to no skill requirement.
There's going to be nothing left to really strive for except fictional entertainment for ourselves alone; all the rich people currently rich and their families will be rich forever. Everybody else is locked down to their current class starting right now.
>we'll all be manual laborers/low skilled workers.
>he doesn't know
You're never going to replace:
>Elevator technicians
>Firefighters
>Police officers
>Intercity truck drivers (long distance is likely out within 20 years)
etc.
Lucky you.
All of that will inevitably be replaced. Saying ANYTHING won't inevitably be replaced is cope. It will eventually happen. AI evolves faster and faster every year. Humanity, as biological organisms, cannot compete with it. This is provable and inarguable. But you may cope and seethe as you see fit.
Anon I don't know how many houses you've worked underneath but until they invent a robot with the deft dexterity of the average human you will need HVAC people, plumbers, etc. I don't know how many roads you've driven on, but you will be unable to get an AI to drive properly on a non-grid road like many in the cities near me.
>th-they will never make a robot with the dexterity of a man, they just won't because... WELL THEY JUST WON'T, OKAY!? I DON'T CARE THAT TECHNOLOGY IS CONSTANTLY IMPROVING WHILE HUMANS ARE STAGNANT, THEY WILL NEVER BEAT US AT <insert this one specific technical thing I personally am investing in>
You're going to be forced to face reality one way or another. They'll probably have robots doing everything by the time you're an old man. If not, then they will in successive generations after you die. It is inevitable. And it isn't a bad thing either, there's no reason for you to seethe about it. The only issue is that it opens up the question for the elites about what to do with all the moronic useless golem servants they no longer need. Before the elites are inevitably wiped out and replaced, themselves. Since they will be human and thus inferior. No human is going to be able to keep up with AI.
>WELL THEY JUST WON'T, OKAY
It's more like they can't my friend. Again, how many houses have you worked underneath? How many roads have you driven on?
>And it isn't a bad thing either
There's nothing left to strive for except masturbatory satisfaction with fictional films we'll be able to create.
>they can't create a machine that moves like a human because... WELL THEY JUST CAN'T, OKAY!?
Kek... oookay buddy. Again, your myopic ass will be forced to face reality one way or another. Maybe then you can put on a VR headset and live in your own cope reality. Either way there really isn't much else to say. Live in your fantasy land if you wish, not my problem at all. The world is full of delusional people who lack vision, you're just one more.
Again, how many houses have you worked underneath? How many roads have you driven on?
You're never going to replace:
>Elevator technicians
>Firefighters
>Police officers
>Intercity truck drivers (long distance is likely out within 20 years)
etc.
And now all of those fields will be overflooded with desperate people looking to take them for less pay, completely destroying their overall value.
It's over. Neo-feudalism is here.
Oh absolutely. It's never been more over. Like I said, everybody is pretty much locked right now to their class, and the rich are going to stay rich forever now.
i'm a project manager employed by a boomer that hates technology. as long as he is alive i'm fine
My friend had a job as an architect at an office ran by an old guy. When he died his wife just closed shop with no severance or even pay for last month. Shit does happen.
My friend got testicular cancer at 23 and died at 25
ouch
you guys are so focused on artists you don’t even realize that shit like customer service will be the first to go, that’s already being replaced by bots. Once they can reason and listen it’s over for those wagies. Same with medical shit tbh
What is anybody going to even do? Just play pretend with VR headsets forever?
If we’re lucky our AI overlords will take pity upon us and keep us as pets
>AI overlords
They won't exist and never will but the elites that commissioned this technology to be created and rolled out for us now do.
hows that any different to you playing pretend friends online here on Cinemaphile for the past 10 years
I think the struggle matters, but maybe I'm just being immature.
Because I can work to attain a new car, or something else I'd like to enjoy that can enrich my life. When everybody's out of work, nobody can do those things anymore.
>But we'll have VR
Yeah and it isn't real. How you guys don't see this as fricking awful is alien to me. It's not the poor artists, it's not the poor cashiers, it's the poor everyone.
>Because I can work to attain a new car, or something else I'd like to enjoy that can enrich my life
wow thats cool. something that a million engineers worked on to produce, without a single second of your input. you gonna make it your personality?
>yeah but it isnt real
see above.
Hmm thats nice and all but i fail to see how providing input or not is relevant on how those things can enrich your life.
Waste of dubs.
>wow thats cool.
With you so far.
>something that a million engineers worked on to produce, without a single second of your input
Still with you.
>you gonna make it your personality?
?????? Who said anything about making a car my personality? It's about it enriching my life. You DO own a car, right? You DO enjoy driving to places with a loved one, right? The more this goes on the more I suspect the only people okay with this are people who haven't really lived a life.
well so whats your personality then
What's the relevance of that to what we're talking about? Also pic related is literally me if it matters.
look its funny and i would of done the same, but it basically agrees with my argument
I'm not sure what your argument is. I don't need to have had a hand in making a car I purchase for it to mean anything to me. The car will not become my personality, it will be a way to enrich my life and share it with loved ones or friends.
sorry anon, ive got lost steam on this random internet shitpost. id go into detail about how using others hardwork to enrich yourself is yadda yadda but im probably going to go to bed right now. hope this helps
It really didn't help make anything about what you're saying more coherent but I hope you have a good sleep.
you too, man. shitposting aside, i hope all of you have a really good rest
>it's interfering with my consumerism!
brainlet
It's interfering with everybody's ability to rise above their current economic standing and social standing.
It's taking everyone towards post scarcity in terms of digital media. The next step will be physical content
>It's taking everyone towards post scarcity in terms of digital media
You cannot imagine how much I didn't care scarcity in digital media. There are enough films released in the last century to last me my entire life, let alone video games and BOOKS. This isn't even close to my concern, my concern is what I already said:
>It's interfering with everybody's ability to rise above their current economic standing and social standing.
Maybe you're upper middle class and you don't give a frick.
>my my my
>talks about the global economy
Your arguing about your personal concerns while trying to present them as a global issue to get someone to care. Post scarcity isn't just about what kinos you or anyone else have available to watch, dumdum
>my my my
>Your arguing about your personal concerns
Yes. My personal concerns concern the privilege of being about to advance my economic and social standing which is being eroded as we speak.
>talks about the global economy
No I didn't. I don't care about Russia or whatever the frick global economy means in this instance.
>Post scarcity isn't just about what kinos
"Post scarcity in terms of digital media" is what I was responding to.
Good. I hate CSRs
This shit is fricking bullshit, if this is the future of cinema I'm going to become a live theatre guy.
Still looks like slop. Pups look good though.
Always will
Jeet thread
>x.com
Not interested in your shady porn site, anon
Before the end of the decade we will reach that point at which images and reality will be indistinguishable. People will either spend their lives plugged in, or leave the Internet behind. Barring other external factors, this will not be that explosive.
>People will either spend their lives plugged in, or leave the Internet behind
I don't think it'll be that extreme. You literally can't leave the internet behind because jobs depend on it. However things like tiktok and fricking news outlets will see sharp dropoffs because you won't be able to believe fricking anything anymore before the decade's out.
whats the point of social content if you cant even be sure if there are any humans involved though?
I think a huge part of the internet is in serious jeopardy.
It's unironically over. These days are the best days we'll ever have.
social media is already fake af, people won't unplug if they're entertained
That's what they expext and what they're counting on.
>Sora, redo the movie Alita: Battle Angel (2019), turn it into a romance movie that involves me as Alita's love interest.
Studios are officially dead
>Sora, make a High school movie that’s 6 hours long set in the late 00s with me as the main character but I’m the based alpha Chad and frick every woman
>sora's face when you just said "all women" so it includes the hags in hr and your sister whose 4 grades lower then you
The implications of this technology are very interesting.
I think we're going to enter an age where what we accept as "reality" is only what we personally see and experience and everything else is questioned or flat out disregarded. Those who are already prone to rejecting facts will only be pushed farther into their own "truths" and many more people will join them as it becomes impossible to trust anything you don't witness personally.
Also art is going to become all about good ideas and how to get AI to output them rather than technical skills. This, theoretically, is great, but we'll have to see how much freedom they allow the average person in creating whatever they want.
I already don't watch the news or tiktok or youtube or whatever's hot nowadays so nothing much is going to change for me digital media wise.
You're posting on Cinemaphile. You're the fartest anyone can be from the average person.
Things are going to get more local and insular for sure, a biiig rise in local events showcasing your film.
Think of what will happen when everyone is like that. No one will bother making news, you'll be completely ignorant of anything happening outside of your immediate area. We truly are marching straight into feudalism again.
I'm not happy about it believe me. We're heading into really, really lame times.
>actually thinks this is great
True goy mindset. It's not gonna be what you think like have you learned nothing by now. If it was truly great for us they would of never rolled it out. Do guys still not see the bigger picture. The actual point of all of this technological development and progression.
>This, theoretically, is great, but...
>theoretically, is great, but...
>theoretically
>but...
Did you even read the post?
There is nothing even theoretically great about it not even remotely.
This is just generated footage of two chinks walking. There is nothing interesting let alone captivating about this.
Since photoshop was invented i've been so lost then the computers started making movies and i just couldn't tell anymore so i stopped going to the cinema. Today people just assume that what they see on their screen isn't real by default but i remember when there were real movies god damnit.
its fricking over bros
>i thought this thread was about puppies because of the thumbnail
imagine my disappointment
>this is now a dog thread
When I was a kid I had this fantasy of a robot who would just make games or movies out of whatever I wanted, then when I grew up I was like "That's so crazy and childish, there's no way that could ever happen in my lifetime"
buy an ad
This is actual news, no one's shilling for anything. Are you fricking moronic?
>How will studios compete?
With stock video clips?
So when will it become the open source like Bing so i could start making up shit for free?
Please God please accelerate. I want it all now, tomorrow afternoon the latest
AR, VR, CBDCs, social credit, unskippable ads IRL, quantum computing, unmaned auto-organized media platforms, "digital persons", drone cops, robot gfs, AI politicians and celebrities, the complete destruction of human creativity and the collapse of reality... Make Baudrillard's nightmare realer than real.
Frick it all to hell.
I used to pray for acceleration
But then I realized we're always accelerating anyway
in less than a year AI videos will be perfect and nobody will be able to tell what is real anymore.
I already feel myself disconnecting to be tbh.
Look at this. This is a real photo of a dog looking silly. We'll be able to make millions just like it, but it'll be fake and I won't care to see any of those millions.
It's a bunch of buttholes who don't know the value of life.
This is goyslop. Imagine what the Pentagon has. Regardless of specific technology, the media fog has killed reality. It's already happened my dude, everything's fake
>Imagine what the Pentagon has
they probably had this kind of tech 20+ years ago thanks to trillion dollar black budget programs
Probably not.
Won't happen.
>Won't happen.
I don't think you know just how over it is.
I know more about ""AI"" than you and I can assure you that nothing world-altering is going to happen in the next five years.
Screencap this.
ok i will mr grumpy poo because you could never see all 4 horses legs off the ground, what a rubbish technology. screenshot ting now anon prepare to eat my ass in the next 6 months
automobile? lol what rubbish. screenshot right now you'll never replace horses
Six months? I'll give you six years anon. If you lose you get to eat your own shit on camera.
eeaf9ae97b2c6091c54b9ca26bfd3564047118b04d73510d1776a91436ed50ba
I will reveal the unencrypted message in six years so you can identify me.
i even saved you as a png
Based, thanks
im rooting for you anon. show those pajeets who's boss
you're like a pleb at the birth of cinema grumpy anon
Here soon you will just be able to rape children and nobody will care because nobody thinks anything is real
imagine simping for AIslop...
Why do they keep making the exact same fricking thread
>HURRR DURRR NO ONE EVER WOULD MISTAKE AI SLOP FOR REAL LIFE
People unironically believed that some Arma3 gameplay is real war footage of an ukrainian fighter pilot. The game is 10 years old
Schindlers List but there's a random chance every 30 seconds that Benny Hill chases all the female prisoners around with the music. If it's an important scene, it can happen in the background
>If it's an important scene, it can happen in the background
The Last Unicorn but they're all slugs and hassidic israelites. Three black children learn the value of stealing. A man on a space station learns over many months to drink his own piss. Four guys just fricking up a truck gone wrong. mexicans winning farting (30 seconds, Dreamworks style)
The Irishman but with a Goodfellas aged Robert D'Niro, Joe Pesci, and 1991 aged Al Pacino
there will come a day I can tell one of you fricking anons to eat my arse and make a detailed webm depicting said arse eating
I want to see M*A*S*H but they're all having a really good time and the Army is winning so they make 8mm Dance films because there's no injured people because we're doing so well. Hawkeye buys heroin for the first time
HotLipsHollihan_blowjob_orgy1.mkv
>AI takes jobs
>population has to fill other jobs
Oh hey looks like we don't need immigration anymore... right?
There has never been a need for immigration, especially in the last 24 years. The last 24 years of immigration policy has been the greatest failure of all western nations.
Computer, create a simulation of that guy at work I hate named Jim, murdering several children. Make it look very real, and submit it to the police.
IMAGINE the porn
Welp guess it's time to upgrade the gpu.