How would she have done at Marvel or DC?

And the out of universe one too, as it turns out.

>beauty trend

>directly address point and show how it doesn’t add up
>deflection
You should learn what words mean before using them, but good on you for not actually adressing my points and showing you can’t argue, I’ll now wait for your assblasted reply where you either continue to ignore them or address them with more flawed logic.

>gets btfo
>starts throwing a shit fit while screaming schizo
lol, definitely struck a nerve, go back to whatever online shithole you came from and stay there

>its schizobabble because… IT JUST IS FRICK YOU SCHIZO
You’re the only one here acting mentally unstable right now.

>No one said that, you lying rat parasite
You did by saying no one should mock her appearance, the only to logical paths after that are to say nothing or approve both enabling this unhealthy behavior, how about you calm down and think before you post.
>It is not. Nobody killed you. All they did was string you up by your rat neck and let you fall
If a person pushes another person off a roof they will be charged for their death, again you’re really are acting moronic right now.
>Same way as you making fun of someone dealing with a mental illness is not harassment
You’re so assblasted you forget what i said which was “not being mocked isn’t a right” seriously calm down before you have a full on tard tantrum.

>No one said that though. You are making it up
I like how you can’t even address the whole thing because you know you have nothing.
>Gravity is not a person
By your if someone stabs another person they didn’t kill them the knife did, so far all you’re doing is just throwing a tantrum and getting more unstable because you can’t argue or deny what I’m saying
>Admitting that you're just mocking someone who is ill and have no actual intention of helping or starting a dialogue about the effects of plastic surgery
Way to move the goalpost, but thanks for showing to don’t think it’s harassment by abandoning that for this lame gotcha.

>You made it up
Keep telling yourself this in between bouts of hysterical tears
>That is your "logic" correct
“No u” how utterly childish yet not unexpected
>Way to admit you were engaging in mockery and had absolutely zero good intentions
That’s not even what you were arguing, you’re now just cherry picking everything you can while throwing a pants shitting tantrum, did I really get to you that badly? Did me pointing out your inconsistent logic really cause this much unhinged rage? Really telling. Also glad to know you don’t think it’s harassment.

>I don't need to tell myself anything. The posts are right there, including the one where you made up a statement out of thin air.
How exactly, you’ve not elaborated and just said it’s bullshit, and that’s all you’ll do because you have nothing else
>no u again
You realized how moronic your logic was and are trying to desperately turn it around
>Cherry picking? You literally admitted it that you were just engaging in mockery. It's what you said and admitted to
And that has nothing to do with what (You) we’re talking about since you said she was being harassed.
>You should have let the other lying rat
You still can’t say how I’m lying and just keep seething.

That wasn't what was being talked about when someone said
>The treatment this girl received for her appearance was the one thing that radicalized me to the feminist's side. The amount of people ruthlessly making fun of her and talking about her like she's a piece of meat that they own was really eye opening.
press ctrl+f and search the terms your insisting they're defending

That's how opinions work. When someone says XY on a topic that's not an invitation to say they said XYZ.

I haven't typed the word meds once?
>I don't recall that being mentioned in the first two posts either, so you'll have to stop.
where did someone say "the topic has to be in the first two posts"?

>man why are people making fun of John Wayne Gacey he was such a stand up guy
>you think pedophilia and murder are okay
>I never said that moron
This is the logic you’re using, ignoring all context while acting like you don’t understand what is being argued.

>You're literally saying
Where did I say someone shouldn't be criticized for unnecessary cosmetic surgery? Fricking link it homosexual.

No one said shit about her appearance until she inexplicably showed up in season 3 looking like Mickey Rourke.

>incomprehensible schizo babble
>crying about being called a schizo
KWAB

>y-you're all samegayging!
bro... your meds

>moron tries to say how that’s bad while claiming to be a feminist
>point out how feminists aren’t cool with plastic surgery
Feminists can be anywhere from against, to all for it or even neutral.
He didn't offer a single opinion about plastic surgery.
Waxing poetic on your impression of feminists doesn't mean anything.

> they were and said that if he’s not cool with that then he must be cool with her fricking herself up with plastic surgery since that is what happened
Why?
>Also no they’re not their whole schtick is fighting against patriarchal ideas of beauty and accepting yourself for who you are. Cosmetic surgery flies in the face of that.
No it isn't lol.
That's what some feminists believe, but there are feminists who think someone's autonomy is more important.

No why MUST it be if you're not cool with that he must be cool with another thing?
You can actually be not cool with that and that's the end of the statement.
>Why would someone that is fighting for women to accepted as they are be cool with an industry that is propped up on unhealthy beauty standards?
Someone can be fighting for women to be accepted as they are and have any further opinion on cosmetic surgery.

The treatment this girl received for her appearance was the one thing that radicalized me to the feminist's side. The amount of people ruthlessly making fun of her and talking about her like she's a piece of meat that they own was really eye opening.

Total neckbeard death

provided no commentary on this so guessing their opinion is pointless.

>The treatment this girl received for her appearance radicalized me
What are you getting out of being obtuse like this?

not me and also not a quote literally saying someone shouldn't be criticized for unnecessary cosmetic surgery

Why? They didn't mention the terms you're insisting must be involved. If they had the opinion you're insisting, they would've explicitly said it.

>No why MUST it be if you're not cool with that he must be cool with another thing
Because he’s defending her appearance, you know the product of the cosmetic surgery and by doing so saying it’s not a big deal at least.
>Someone can be fighting for women to be accepted as they are and have any further opinion on cosmetic surgery
Do you also think a person fighting for civil rights can also support segregation without that being a massive inconsistency or paradox? You’re aware that the very idea of cosmetic surgery goes against being yourself you’re literally changing yourself to conform to an idealizes version of what you want to be. That’s the exact opposite of being yourself.

>Because he’s defending her appearance, you know the product of the cosmetic surgery and by doing so saying it’s not a big deal at least.
No he's not. Else he would say explicitly that.
>Do you also think a person fighting for civil rights can also support segregation without that being a massive inconsistency or paradox?
Yes. Not wanting apartheid drinking fountains and wanting serial killers segregated from society in prison is not a hot take.
>You’re aware that the very idea of cosmetic surgery goes against being yourself
Depends on your school of thought.
Some people say if you want to get a nose job and it would make you happy that is being yourself. Others disagree. Anon gave no opinion.

You can segregate people so there is a drinking fountain for white people only and one for black people only.
This is bad.
You can segregate people so proven criminals don't have the the ability to be free.
This is good.
All the above is a very simple example of how a person fighting for civil rights can also "support" segregation

That's called a hot take. I provided a tepid one to demonstrate that compartmentalization isn't hard.

>Let's say you're a Olympic athlete
But I'm not, and neither are 99.9999999999% of the population.

Cool, fact is body dysmorphia still is a large umbrella over a variety of circumstances that isn't necessarily about what you're born with.

What trauma?

Having body dysmorphia.

>No one said that, you lying rat parasite
You did by saying no one should mock her appearance, the only to logical paths after that are to say nothing or approve both enabling this unhealthy behavior, how about you calm down and think before you post.
>It is not. Nobody killed you. All they did was string you up by your rat neck and let you fall
If a person pushes another person off a roof they will be charged for their death, again you’re really are acting moronic right now.
>Same way as you making fun of someone dealing with a mental illness is not harassment
You’re so assblasted you forget what i said which was “not being mocked isn’t a right” seriously calm down before you have a full on tard tantrum.

You did by saying no one should mock her appearance, the only to logical paths after that are to say nothing or approve both enabling this unhealthy behavior, how about you calm down and think before you post.
You can say nothing, approve or not approve. Not approving doesn't enable the behaviour.

>Considering you’re just standing there
You're not just standing there. You're not approving.
Just standing there and being apathetic would fall under "say nothing".

Which came first?

>She said in interviews she had body dysmorphia.
>That doesn't come from people being kind.
or
[...]
>>What trauma?
[...]
>Having body dysmorphia.

what

>Coomers harass good looking people
Then she should be thrilled her looks are gone and her face looks like a plastic fricktoy now.

wow I wonder who is behind this post

>You’re not approving but you’re also not disapproving
If you are not approving you are disapproving... Please go back to where you learned English. Someone who does not approve of something would very well say "I disapprove" without contradicting themselves.

It's pointless to attempt to have a reasonable discussion, people will just pretend they didn't call her bogged months ago as if the archives don't exist.

Yeah I argue over shit on the internet to just practice reason skills, I'm not going to change anyone's mind on anything, best case scenario someone on the fence about whatever is being discussed lurking sees that there is in fact pushback for garbage.

>Considering I didn’t say that
I didn't say you said that, I was disagreeing with what you did say:
>You’re not approving but you’re also not disapproving
is what you said, as if the two are mutually exclusive. They're not.

*grammar

>What? If I was harping on spelling wouldn't I have said THAT outright
Glad you acknowledge you weren’t talking about the other shit you said to backpedal
>If I was backpedaling my claification that I don't believe they're mutually exclusive wouldn't fit in
It would considering that was the original point you were trying to make before changing it to harp on grammar and then going back when called out
>I've fully explained it's not apathy
You haven’t since you’re acting like that someone that actually gave a shit about something would just ignore it and say nothing when it appears or is brought up. Where as someone who doesn’t care or is apathetic doesn’t say anything.
>if you don't approve because you're disagreeing
Are you having a stroke?

That's what these parasites do. Throw stones and then hide, deflect and deny.

>No why MUST it be if you're not cool with that he must be cool with another thing
Because he’s defending her appearance, you know the product of the cosmetic surgery and by doing so saying it’s not a big deal at least.
>Someone can be fighting for women to be accepted as they are and have any further opinion on cosmetic surgery
Do you also think a person fighting for civil rights can also support segregation without that being a massive inconsistency or paradox? You’re aware that the very idea of cosmetic surgery goes against being yourself you’re literally changing yourself to conform to an idealizes version of what you want to be. That’s the exact opposite of being yourself.

>sociopaths
That's not how you spell women

She said in interviews she had body dysmorphia.
That doesn't come from people being kind.

Body dysmorphia is a very complex thing that doesn't just cover being born a way.
Let's say you're a Olympic athlete but then you're injured and lose your muscle definition and put on weight, that can cause you to feel dysmorphic too, and could lead to eating disorders.

>(allegedly) be picked on
>"I'll show them!"
>turn yourself into a bimbo caricature of yourself
>get picked on
>"BLARGHFKSUBVSLADIFGLAKSDFG!" goes the simp

topkek

pic because this is still Cinemaphile

What trauma?

Trauma doesn't adhere to your rulings.

>they are picking on her for something out of her control
She was forced to undergo the procedures?
How barbaric!

The shape of her face was out of her control.
Her metabolism was out of her control.
Coomers harass good looking people.

Holy shit that's a really good paint job

It's not killing if we string you up by your putrid rat neck and let you fall from a great height

>being mocked isn’t a right
It's not kind

>This argument is so moronic. He's saying that the woman is being attacked so heavily because of misogyny
Then why did no one comment on her appearance before the surgery? Because if it’s all misogyny then that would be the case.
>she shouldn't be harassed
No one is harassing here their criticizing her appearance. How about you stop using inflammatory language to dishonesty make this sound worse that it is.

>criticizing her appearance
wtf does that mean? they get together and giver her constructive criticism on how she can improve how she looks? They're talking shit and insulting her. I'm not an expert on cosmetic surgery so maybe it can be reversed but I'm guessing that she can't go back to the way she used to look. So they are picking on her for something out of her control. I would call that harassment or bullying

She has body dysmorphia

>It's not kind
Being unkind alone isn’t harassment but way to move the goalpost
>wtf does that mean? they get together and giver her constructive criticism on how she can improve how she looks
It means exactly what I said it means, do you think that criticism and constructive criticism are the same thing? Maybe try a dictionary.

No, you said it wasn't a right when someone said it was. By unkind, I meant people were being buttholes to her. Nothing changed. The whole point is that she doesn't deserve that treatment

>Also, we won't kill Maeve despite her getting depowered right before falling from a skyscrapper...because she's a lesbian.
>This is totally more realistic and brutal than the comics btw.

>>This is totally more realistic and brutal than the comics btw.
I'm almost done with the first book and I'm liking the show better so far. Its a bit overly edgy, like them all raping Starlight and Tek Knight fricking everything. The show was exciting to watch the whole way through. I can't give it a fair judgement yet since I haven't finished it though. If you think the comic is better, why?

>If you think the comic is better, why?
-More focus on mocking comic book tropes and conventions, which is something the show has tossed aside in favour of athlete/action films parody. Example: Herogasm.

-The fights. Both are the same gory shit, but as the show went on the fights started becoming more drawn out and MCU-lite.
Season 3 is the worst offender of this, with the climax being a fight that started over an idiotic reason, out of place rock pop music, topped off with a fake out death that might have come out of a Disney film not an anti-superhero show. It made me appreciate the dumb bluntness of the comic's "fights", which lasted one-two pages most of the time and just went straight to the point.

-While I like Homelander better in the show, mostly because of Starr, it's painfully obvious that the producers have taken notice of how much of a highlight he is that they're putting him front and center and extending his story for no reason other than to bank on his following.
This leads to the show being schizo about whether Homelander is a pathetic manchild (said by three Vought CEOs at this point) or an evil mastermind that just dupes everyone who is around him including the people that should be in charge of him, which in turn makes the protagonists feel less competent and on the same level.
The comics had it straight: He's a pathetic manchild whose on a leash for 90% of the time and the moment he finally got off it he fricked things up for himself.

-I remember back in S1 an interview with the showrunners where they said that they didn't give the Boys compound V to make them rely on their wits alone against people who could kill them in a blink. This worked greatly in season 1, you could feel the tension when Frenchie was distracting Homelander and Hughie's dad was being held by A-Train. Then season 2 happened, and it turns out all they had to do was just blackmail supers. Then they said frick it and introduced Temp V.

Oh, forgot to add: Every time they attempt to adapt something from the comic, they just do it surface-level.

(cont.)
And well, the tension that was around season 1 just took a vacation to Herogasm. Now we're sure that nothing will happen to either the Boys nor the Seven and unlike the comics where they had a non-aggression pact, what prevents them here from actually killing eachother is shit writing (again, season 3 is the biggest offender of this).
-The Boys themselves:
--Frenchie/Kimiko's plot is just will-they-won't-they ad nauseam. Frenchie's role as the team's top man is nothing more than a background thing because, again, their preferred method of beating supes now is V + blackmail. Kimiko is at least a bit more interesting because once in a while you get stuff about her past and how she copes with being the team's weapon. IMO she was at her best in season 1+2. The comic shoved most of their relationship to background gags yet their final moment together had a lot more impact.
--Hughie/Starlight is worse. 90% the time is just Wee Hughie getting shat over nonsense stuff like "How dare you try to get superpowers to protect yourself and me from the bloodthirsty supes we're fighting against?" or being forced to ally himself with Soldier Boy who at the time wasTHEIR ONLY CHANCE TO KILL THE HOMICIDAL MANIAC THAT TANKED AN ATOM BOMB AS A CHILD. Then they reconcile and pretend it wasn't just a waste of time. I admit their comic relationship was nothing most of the time, but at least it was held by the plot-line of Hughie hiding his supe killing life from her, which was speedran by the show in S1.
--I just prefer Butcher as the reserved psychopath he is in the comic.
There's a lot more, but the gist of it is not that the comic is a masterpiece, it's that the show had a good thing going but the longer they drag it on, the worse it gets in comparison to the former. Now we get spin-offs with unironic post-credit scenes where Butcher just shows up and says "c**t" and Homelander does his trademark laser thing, despite going against everything it stands for.

Oh, forgot to add: Every time they attempt to adapt something from the comic, they just do it surface-level.

The comic and especially the show are both worse than even the cringiest MSheU schlock.

>outing yourself as a reddit tourist

plebbitor simping

>It's not kind
Being unkind alone isn’t harassment but way to move the goalpost
>wtf does that mean? they get together and giver her constructive criticism on how she can improve how she looks
It means exactly what I said it means, do you think that criticism and constructive criticism are the same thing? Maybe try a dictionary.

>cognitive dissonance.
My point exactly, it’s paradoxical behavior and not in any way healthy or productive for the ideology.