I can't believe a chick who's in her fifties had a rage quit over some dude's Scooby Doo animation, how pathetic can you be?
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
I can't believe a chick who's in her fifties had a rage quit over some dude's Scooby Doo animation, how pathetic can you be?
I'll bite. What the frick happened?
Look at OPs picture. It drove her up the wall.
Carlos!
Ok, I'll use my detective skills to deduce what happened. In the catalog there's a thread for some guys fan animation featuring Scooby. I saw the video and the creator mentions using AI to mimick the voices of the gang. I'm guessing the news somehow got to the person in the OP and she threw a tantrum over it.
She was upset because she voiced Daphne for a long time on several other Scooby projects but she wasn't asked to be in the Velma cast (because Daphne is Asian now so they wanted an Asian actress) so she made snarky comments about it online.
What?
Did Grey say something based and OP is being a gay?
It really is astounding that so voice actors are against AI voice changing. Especially since most of them are 50, 60, 70+ years old legacy actors who have completely fricked their throats and can't do a (good) impression of their former voices anymore.
In live action works they'd never let a 70 year old play a 20 year old, so they're already fricking lucky, and AI voice changing could let these decrepit ass dinosaurs still work until their demented asses can't be wheeled into the studio from the nursing home anymore while still giving a good performance. It still requires an actor to say the original lines, and clearly there is a market (as stupid and pointless as it is) for "iconic" voice actors to deliver the lines themselves.
It reminds me of the ~controversy~ around singers using auto-tune in the 00s. Just a bunch of dumb motherfrickers cancelling musicians and raging against 'inauthentic' music, and now twenty years later every musician, politician and voice actor uses auto-tune all the time.
Nah they were right, autotuning was a terrible fad back then and it existed before they justwere using it really fricking terribly.. Shittalking new techology is always a god thing because it makes artists put actual conscious thought into its use going forward. Only idiots with no context act like in retrospect thaat any criticism was bad.
No, you're just a moron. The criticism was stupid and invalid back then, and just because you're a boomer who only likes to listen to pure country music (which is also all auto-tuned to hell, in studio AND live performance) the events of this decade and how people have stopped caring prove how completely wrong people were to seethe and mald over auto-tune in the first place.
Sorry mate, you're wrong, come back when you can handle criticism or keep crying about the fact majority of autotune in the 00s was trash.
The majority of auto-tune in the 00s was imperceptible. The only reason some boomer morons complained is because some artists decided they liked the weird robotic sound of distorting auto-tune until it was noticeable and used that, as a creative decision, to make their dumb pop songs.
It literally just boils down to boomer rage that the young kids were listening to Kesha and Kanye instead of Led Zeppelin and Nancy Sinatra.
Okay zoomer, stp typing about shit you don't know or maybe actually go listen to the music you think you're talking about
Thank you for conceding the argument.
>Can't refute what was just laid down
Right...concession.
>can't refute... nothing
Haha you literally didn't make an argument you tard.
>sToP tYpInG aBoUt ShIt YoU DoN't KnOw Or MaYBe Go LiStEn tO MuSiC
Haha oh you sure got me with that gigabrain "argument"
If we had your mindset, we'd still be stuck at cave drawings. Shit talking is never constructive and only deters people from experimenting.
>NOOOO YOU SHOULD NEVER GET PAID FOR YOUR VOICE/LIKENESS BEING USED IN SOMETHING
FRICK OFF COMMIE
Yes. Unless you did the labor yourself you have no moral or legal right to compensation for an impression.
You cannot copyright a dance move, you cannot copyright a voice.
Just don't use their work to create then, should be simple.
Should be simple because they ain't working when AI does an impression of their voice.
But the AI needs data of their voice to do an "impression" so just don't use that data.
You could be posting on Cinemaphile right now and tomorrow and the day after that