Is she implying the blonde girl is in the wrong for referring to her friend as a “girl friend” ? Because women do that all the time.
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
I dont get this one
99% of women I know would sooner call their friends girlfriends than actually mean they're gay, so making this assumption just makes an ass out of her.
>her
So they're not even a lesbian? They're being a c**t and being a c**t about being a c**t, but they don't even have a c**t. That's some c**tception.
rent-free
Jesus Christ. Guys, that’sthejoke.jpg. I don’t think this comic is funny, but this is why people say that Cinemaphile is all autists. The purple haired girl is “lolsoquirky” obviously the blonde most likely means a friend but she wants to project something #relatable onto her. The joke is that it’s either quirky or a little jerky (I mean, her saying that out loud at the end is jerky for the sake of a punchline).
>The purple haired girl
>girl
If you knew the comics made by this person, you would know that she ain’t joking around.
This comic's creator purely does "me vs. strawman" format comics. You're not supposed to laugh at purple hair, you're supposed to relate.
all women are bisexual, it's an easy mistake to make
>sorry i don't communicate with straighties
>"I don't get it" bait
Threads like this should be a bannable offense followed by a pipe bomb to the house
She has coom brain, thats all
This artist is literally incapable of depicting themselves as a nice person
and the fact that this b***h thinks she’s in the right every single time is just annoying
like shit, I know it’s ironic to hear it coming from this site, but how can someone live such a miserable life acting like a cynical butthole
maybe because that "thing" is not nice, and probably not a person either
NOW THIS I WOULD LOVE TO SEE
It's a comic. Your standards of politeness are out of wack. It'd not rude so much as overly familiar.
I'd understand calling the character in the new guy comic rude.
No, she's just an ass.
Nah this person's comments outside of the comic have made it painfully clear that this is legitimately how they are and they think it's deserving of praise. They are just a deeply unpleasant person that doesn't understand that the world doesn't love them for being a complete piece of shit.
The joke is she's not gay either, she's a man in drag. That's called being straight.
Oh hey, I'm gay too!
t. autogynephile
That's for trans people
>I’m gay too!
Lol. No you aren’t. You’re a straight man larping as a woman.
Someone draw them fricking
The lesbian version of "she was a b***h anyway"
The blonde girl boyfriend is the nice guy employee
>the way I enjoy sex defines me as a person
This is why people don't like modern LGBTUVW%+& culture.
I'm old.enough to remember when how you liked to frick was considered personal and didn't even come up in day to day conversation.
Fake and gay.
The only prople eho fidnt publicly talk about frickin are repressed religitards and waspy white people with religious roots.
You're basically admitting to being a pretentious sexless homosexual
Okay, champ.
Society was better when you could be alive and not have to read about degenerates telling everyone at their university about their sex life.
>not have to read about degenerates telling everyone at their university about their sex life.
Who's forcing you to read about someone's sex life?
mainstream
who is forcing you to read about sex in the mainstream?
You are literally insisting it's normal for people to tell everyone about their sex.
The amount of rampant gay sex in high academia late 1800s and early 1900s would make your head spin.
All this horseshit about "the good old days" that were somehow devoid of sex and people just sprouted from the earth fully formed like mushrooms. Frick outta here with that shit.
The good old days
In my bible belt town
Where everyone knew the priest was fricking boys, but it wasnt me or my boy
And we only talk about how hot a woman is but not how we want to access her holes
Frick off cat cabal
>life was better in a time period that i made up
>This is why people don't like modern LGBTUVW%+& culture.
>I'm old.enough to remember when how you liked to frick was considered personal and didn't even come up in day to day conversation.
This comic doesn't mention sexual intercourse at all though?
If you are talking about just relationships in general, that's always been something that can come up in a day to day conversation.
>pretending that sexual attraction has nothing to do with lgbt culture
t. ignorant straight "ally"
>This comic doesn't mention sexual intercourse at all though?
Are you fricking moronic? She outright said she is a lesbian, i.e. a homosexual. Sexual, as in, wanting to have sex with that sex.
Is it weird to talk about being married with your friends? Most people frick their wives.
>false equivalencies
What an intellectually dishonest person you are.
How is it a false equivalency?
Suppose someone ere to say "I'm a guy and I'm married to a woman, and we're trying for kids". They are basically saying theyre straight and theyre frequenty rawdogging their wife.
You're proving the point.
If the barista wasn't interested in how the blonde fricks than she(he) wouldn't lose interest once she(he) learned she wasn't gay.
Same with marriage/kids.
Normal people don't hear about marriage/pregnancy and have the first thing come to mind be "theyre straight and theyre frequenty rawdogging"
So, why can't you say "Normal people don't hear about being straight or gay and have the the first thing that comes to mind be they are having sex"?
Have you seen a pride parade in the last 15 years?
A pride parade isn't a girlfriend. We aren't talking about that.
>global annual event centered around LBGT culture isn't relevant to a discussion of LGBT culture
>They are basically saying theyre straight and theyre frequenty rawdogging their wife.
NTA, but you're being disingenuous and making a false equivalence. By presenting the end result, you're leaving the details up to the person you're speaking towards, so they can understand it even if they don't understand sex. I.E. A kid will understand "we're trying to have kids" even if they haven't had 'the talk.' Meanwhile an adult can piece it together, but doesn't need to hear "yeah, so Thursday I stick it Doggystyle in her, then a few hours after we went to shower together and she peed on me as foreplay before we fingered each other and then went for another round of missionary..." to get the idea.
>NTA, but you're being disingenuous and making a false equivalence. By presenting the end result, you're leaving the details up to the person you're speaking towards, so they can understand it even if they don't understand sex.
It's not a false equivalence or being disingenuous.
That same comparison can be said about saying "I am gay" or "I am straight" rather than saying "I like fricking men/women"
Your reply is basically just an overly-wordy "nuh uh" that doesn't actually address anything I just said.
Please bring a counterargument instead of more troon rage, homosexual.
>Comparison
Stupid point on your end, since people that are verbose about their sexual preferences without relevance are also seen as obnoxious, and, especially in the case of straight males, juvenile. If you see a post on some website that says "I like big boobies," do you not assume that it's written either by a kid or an adult woth arrested development and low social awareness? Contra-example, how many people in this thread have divulged their sexual preferences?
"I like big boobies" is not the same thing as "I like women".
Keep in mind, in the OP cartoon, the character only said they were gay, because they thought the other person was also talking about their romantic relationships.
>"I like big boobies" is not the same thing as "I like women".
You're trying to go after the details, but could swap it with "I like sex with women" and the entire point remains. Now address it, troon.
I like to have sex with women is not the same thing as "I like women".
No, but it's the same as "I'm a lesbian" or a woman saying "I'm gay."
Now answer the question.
What was the question?
>No, but it's the same as "I'm a lesbian" or a woman saying "I'm gay."
Is that relatively equivalent to saying I'm straight? Or does saying I'm gay imply sex more so than saying I'm straight?
>Is that relatively equivalent to saying I'm straight?
Yes, you dumb sealioning homosexual, which is also obnoxious.
I ask you again, how many people are bringing up their sexual preference in this thread, and when you see that shit in the wild, don't you also assume poorly of that fricker's social awareness?
Most people don't go out and broadcast their sexuality or explicit activity to the world. So your earlier complaint is bunk.
It's not like it was brought up with zero prompting.
>Keep in mind, in the OP cartoon, the character only said they were gay, because they thought the other person was also talking about their romantic relationships.
>It's not like it was brought up with zero prompting
In both the comic and hypothetical, it is.
Did you read the comic?
The blonde says shes getting a drink with her girlfriend, then the pink hair says "I'm gay too!" because she thinks the blonde was claiming to be gay.
That's not a prompt anymore than "drink."
So, would it be rude to mention that you are married if someone else mentions they are married?
...Yeah, actually. It's generally rude to hijack a conversation to make it about yourself.
Pulling away from the subject of sexuality, the comic is doing something called a "psychological game." In it, a presenter initiating the game attempts to initiate a conversation wherein they pose as a lower position in a transactional analysis, then try to flip dynamics after the other participant responds. In terms lf the comic, he asks for her to explain something, latches onto a detail, then ignores the rest and tries to mentally one-up her.
To put it in leyman's terms, he wanted to talk about himself, and used the other woman to do so.
Is it bad to talk about being pregnant, because pregnancy is caused by sex?
I want to frick the author's purple-haired avatar and tell him he's a sissy homosexual that will always be a b***h, that is his identity, moaning like a b***h, letting his falsetto slip hearing his manly voice, briefly only for him to apologize, holy shit, what the frick is wrong with me?
>tfw you're trying to chase a high from your comic being ridiculed 4 years ago
Now this is actually funny. Good edit, anon!
Needs to have her be called a "terf" instead of "dyke."
Bait thread, but just incase some moron actually doesn't get it. The joke rests entirely on the fact that many homosexuals make their homosexualry their personality. The writer, being a homosexual, thinks this is normal, thus their response of disgust.
IS THAT A FRICKING EGG STEALER?
>the old "you can't tell who's gay until they tell you" bit
I know normies don't really have gaydar but every seasoned queer person I've ever met could count how many of their kind there were in any given building from across the street, the author should go outside and touch some b***hes sometimes
But he--SHE's a HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE HOMO--LES--GAYBIAN.
Ngl, gaydar only works for men or really butch women.
Gaydar is bullshit, I’ve been in rooms with people who swore they could tell anyone who’s gay. Well I’m a closet bi sexual that has fricked around in secret with men and none of those people have ever picked up on me.
i can guess how internet poisoned a person is and what their website of choice probably is. i guess that's like a sad kind of gaydar
Well everyone on Cinemaphile is a self hating gay.
It's gonna suck to stop coming to Cinemaphile once im in a relationship
The smut of that bawd is good, tho
What do I search on r34 real question.
"New_guy"
>Most of it, has vegana
Boring, I want to see that homosexual's dick as he gets fricked and told he's a homosexual as he moans about how it's all an act.
I just saw this in the last drawthread. Why is everyone talking about this now, lol?
>no bulge on >her
Disgusting
Can someone edit a recognizable bulge on?
>No bulge
Fricking gay and boring.
i think i’m still blocked by this b***h on twitter because she went through all of oney’s followers after he called her out lol
>SHE
you know damn well what you want to imply
>gayness is my personality
also, New Guy will be forever based in my heart
Because this weird era of oversexualization of everything means people think any two people who are friends are either
A. Fricking/Dating
B. if they say they aren't, they're doing it secretly.
The idea that two people can be close friends with each other without there being a sexual element to it is mindbogglingly alien to these people.
>Because this weird era of oversexualization of everything means people think any two people who are friends are either
>A. Fricking/Dating
>B. if they say they aren't, they're doing it secretly.
>The idea that two people can be close friends with each other without there being a sexual element to it is mindbogglingly alien to these people.
It's not about oversexualization, its about how words are typically used.
Its because 90% of the time* words like boyfriend and girlfriend are used as euphemisms for someone you are in a (somewhat) committed relationship with, but not married to.
*Made up statistic
You have seriously never heard women called their friends "girlfriends"? How sheltered are you?
So tired of homosexuals and trannies constantly thinking with their dick
Shut up, hole
>You have seriously never heard women called their friends "girlfriends"? How sheltered are you?
>So tired of homosexuals and trannies constantly thinking with their dick
I didn't say i NEVER heard of it. I said that most of the time, people use girlfriend/boyfriend to refer to their romantic partner.
When a normal looking girl says "girlfriend " they are referring to a platonic friend.
Stop being so sheltered and talk to real people not fake women in groomercord
The writer is a troony who doesn't know how actual women act
>The writer is a troony who doesn't know how actual women act
Actual straight women sometimes call their female friends girlfriends. It's not in the romantic sense, but rather in the sense of them being a girl and a friend.
I think it's more common among older women.
It's pretty common across the board, zoomer generations honestly expanded it if anything.
The real issue with the comic is that I don't think there's a single Starbucks barista who actually likes talking to their customers. Local coffee shop guys in particularly small towns will talk to regulars who know what they want (typically just cream and sugar or black) and are able to order quickly but baristas in general typically hate their job and when one customer orders the next is already in line
>sometimes
It's EXTREMELY common.
>Is she implying the blonde girl is in the wrong for referring to her friend as a “girl friend” ? Because women do that all the time.
The purple haired chick is not saying its wrong to use the word in that way. She's saying she misunderstood and would have found the other meaning more entertaining.
>chick
>She
?
post the edit where the new guy points a gun at him
Just make porn instead. It's clear you don't have Stonetoss' wit.
>pretend to be a girl
>constantly seethe about how women act
Why are they like this?
I'm still not convinced that this strip isn't a psyop to make LGBTQ+ lox look bad.
You know what my grind my gears the most? The self-insert is the one who started the damn conversation in the first place.
If you are going to act like the victim because the topic is "suddenly" less interesting to you, at least, make sure you were dragged into the conversation against your will, damn it.
Tell me the artist got bashed for this one on social media as well, just like the one with the new guy.
wasn't this also the one who crowed about shoplifting from the art store?
She's not wrong, it's a joke about how the term is misleading, the context relies on you assuming the person saying it is straight and is using it the way black chicks would say it. The comic artist isn't very smart or clever/draws from real awkward encounters where she gets to put in the snarky b***h last word.
Also she finds gay dating relatable and is happy to hear people being open about it.
>she
Sorry, you aren't allowed to understand jokes on this site. You need to leave.
stop replying to yourself, you dumb troon.
Not a troony, and I didn't respond to my self.
sure
>the way black chicks would say it
so this yet another thing we're saying black people invented.
/thread
The artist is still a moron but everyone ITT is just being as uncharitable as possible
I said stop replying to yourself. nobody is buying it.
People get the supposed joke, shit I'm sure I've seen it better executed in other strips.
The issue is that the comic artist's stand-in comes out as a total jerk in the conversation. They are the ones initiating the conversation, and then regreting it because they didn't like what they heard. It doesn't help the artist is already infamous for playing the victim.
I'd say more autism or socially clueless than jerk
no she's a jerk.
half her comics are her being an butthole lol, while the other half are her being all hurt because someone else said something. Apparently, she can dish it out but can't take it.
Everyone deserves empathy
no. people don't "deserve" empathy. Earn that by being a decent person yourself.
>this persone is an butthole
>t. butthole
You don't see me pleading for empathy do you?
Unironically this. Also, it doesn't help that everyone demanding that others have "empathy" for them caused their own problems in life and refuse to own up to that.
>Everyone deserves empathy
Different anon but:
Noble words. Not a terrible sentiment at all, but at the risk of a non-sequitur, consider for a moment who you are advocating sympathy for. Is this individual someone who would say the same if the situation were reversed? If it was someone they politically did not align themselves with?
I still agree with the sentiment of sympathy and respect. And I don't think harassing the artist is fair or right. Though you have to understand, the artist here has shown repeatedly that they don't feel the same way you do about sympathy or basic respect. It's very difficult for a lot of people to show that kind of respect to someone who has none to share for others. Put simply, when the bully gets picked on, most people might very well tell you they "deserved" it.
Personally? I'm of the opinion that a lot of really bad stuff typically starts with someone who thought they 'deserved' something, or that someone else did or didn't. Hell, the entire situation with the artist here happened because she felt that Pewdiepie "deserved" to be robbed.
tl;dr
TL;DR -
"Deserve's got nothing to do with it."
>Hell, the entire situation with the artist here happened because she felt that Pewdiepie "deserved" to be robbed.
It's not even a function of deserve, it's just funny when bad things happen to people who antagonize you. We don't need to talk about what is or is not antagonism from Pewds, just a basic concept of schadenfreude and how dumb "how would you like it" sounds.
It's also funny that the use of "empathy" is so advantageous in these threads that we went from the anti-glasses troony side saying empathy is good and NG is right to this autistic push back against the concept of empathy when someone asks to give it to the troony. Weird.
>concept of empathy
nice reframing the discussion
see
"How would you like it" is generally used in these kinds of discussions to gauge someone's ability to be consistent in their moral compass.
It might sound silly but I think it has an important place sometimes.
But take that with some salt since I'm the bleeding heart type sometimes.
Sometimes it does! When you frame someone as bad, in that context, you have revealed that it's okay when it happens to bad people. If you are laughing at a random person falling and hurting themselves, yes "how would you like it if it happened to you". To which they may say "I hope someone is there to enjoy it". It sometimes has a place but has a very limited use and needs more context.
At the risk of a further segue, I have considered this before, but when I hear, "well it's ok when it happens to someone who is bad," I have to start analyzing who is "bad." I start to question myself who I might consider "bad" and I often find myself wondering if I (or anyone else) might conflate "bad" with "person who has wronged me." Or, "person I dislike." And if you'll pardon me for reaching a bit, I've noticed personally that more than a few people (the artist of the comic in the OP included) have done the same and said, "they deserved it (because I don't like them.)" And that's what I mean when I say a lot of really bad things start with someone thinking they or someone else 'deserves' something. Whether it's something good or bad, a lot of the time the only justification for whether or not someone 'deserves' it is quite honestly how much they like the person. And whether or not you like someone or not doesn't seem like a good frame of justice. Cosmic or otherwise. To me, anyway. But that's not me hanging judgement on anybody else here, that's just the conclusion I've come to several times.
That, and my Dad used to quote Tolkien a lot on the subject: "Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends."
>well, me, I like to consider things
I get it, you aren't like the other girls.
Well I should hope I'm not.
Since I'm not one.
The artists persona is supposed to be b***hy and snarky. When you're that and also drawing from real world interactions, the "humor" is you just being petty. Sure some may get it but it's not worth the antagonism most people feel.
I don't read too much into that antagonism because I'm used to more aggressive push backs on this site. Violent pepes and wojacks used to express distaste of funko pop collectors. I get the humor, but rarely does the internet collectively grasp pearls and ask "why do they want to kill funko pop collectors?? Why are they so evil??" In context the snarky b***h humor isn't that openly hostile.
see
We're agreeing, you're just adding the "can dish it out but can't take it" when dishing it out is making unfunny comics about unnamed randos and taking it is dogpiling worse than most lolcows get.
Maybe smaller lolcows, but not the bigger ones. But a good point otherwise.
>>we're agreeing
apparently were not. in her comics she says whatever she wants and people are supposed to let it go, but when other people say things she don't like it's "poor widdle me."
>dogpiling on a Cinemaphile thread is so horrible
and there seems to be no shortage of dopes rushing in to defend her in the thread, unless as I believe it's all one person agreeing with himself
They were probably talking about the dogpiling she recieved on other sites.
they make these comics in the first place for asspat comments. if you don't want feedback don't put shit out there. especially when her comic avatar wants to get away with being a b***h.
I only want people telling me how RIGHT I am.
Wow i can tell we're going to be the best of friends
The joke was that she's a snarky b***h and he's dumb for asking that "how would you like it" question when the answer is almost always "I think they're bad so if I were like them and a bad thing happened to them that would be good".
The new guy comic was bad. The shoplifting one was fine.
>theft is le good
Eat shit, poorgay
nah frick the shoplifting one too. It's fricking art supplies. she wasn't stealing bread to feed her family.
Wow, a cartoon character in a story isn't a perfect paragon of morality, how "awful".
so when did she get so upset when people commented on the "cartoon character" being a shit?
it's almost like it was her avatar or something and we weren't supposed to see her as wrong.
and you know this.
>so when did she get so upset when people commented on the "cartoon character" being a shit?
>it's almost like it was her avatar or something and we weren't supposed to see her as wrong.
>and you know this.
Examples?
example of what? people commenting on her character being wrong? isn't that what everyone is saying happened to the poor thing?
This part, where did she get upset about this:
>so when did she get so upset when people commented on the "cartoon character" being a shit?
Isn't that why you're all defending her. Are you telling me she WASN'T bothered now? so then why are you all babbling about?
I am asking about the shoplifting comic, not the new guy comic.
we're talking about the artist in general and all her shitty comics see
See these posts. These posts were about the shoplifting comic:
okay, but the rest of us are talking about the artist. if you want to talk about that one specific comic so you can ignore what everyone's saying, have fun.
Same butthole that if I don't tongue the anus of some troony celebrity will cry that is literally genocide
what a fricking crybaby. No wonder he's a troony
Good lord, what a whiny c**t.
Oop, now it's "LITERAL NAZIS"
>they were goosestepping to my house HLP
This is probably because of kiwifarms
Kiwifarms aren't nazis you tard.
>NO! Everyone that picks on me is a NAZI
>Kiwifarms aren't nazis you tard.
They're kinda nazi adjacent. They definitely do target some people on the far-right (like Hispanic fuentes), but overall their political view are very far-right. It's close enough that you can see why the average person would get confused about technical details
>nazi adjacent.
oh frick off.
>we're gonna dilute the meaning of EVERY WORD until nothing means anything.
How am I diluting the meaning of the word? Most of the users hate minorities, women, israelites, homos, blacks, hispanics,etc. A lot of them pro-ethnostate. I'm not calling some random boomer who voted trump or alex jones a nazi.
Kiwifarms is genuinely a significantly worse place than /misc/.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism
Nazi doesn't mean someone who says things you don't like
They tend to be people who like to control what other people do and say.
>Grammer Nazi
>Femenazi
Commies do it too, but commies don't say the quiet part loud. They're smarter about it and less obvious when they're trying to control you.
... Well the commies who are good at it anyway.
so when you say Nazi you don't mean Nazi. you just like using a loaded word.
Yeah, probably. I'm not taking anyone to a gas chamber over it.
NTA, but it's painfully obvious you know absolutely jack shit about that site other than gossip from trannies that never visited.
Keffals is not a reliable source.
>NTA, but it's painfully obvious you know absolutely jack shit about that site other than gossip from trannies that never visited.
>Keffals is not a reliable source.
I've read the site, It's genuinely way worse than what keffals has complained about.
If you read anything on the site, you would know exactly why Keffals is not someone you should believe, or any of the other "dropkiwifarms" groomers.
I don't use that term lightly. It's not a coincidence that a lot of the people who want that site taken down are groomers, zoos, and criminals.
>If you read anything on the site, you would know exactly why Keffals is not someone you should believe, or any of the other "dropkiwifarms" groomers.
>I don't use that term lightly. It's not a coincidence that a lot of the people who want that site taken down are groomers, zoos, and criminals.
People hate the place because they stalk people and the site encourages harassment of its targets.
A lot of the people KF stalks arent "groomers, zoos, and criminals". And when they are, that's typically used as a Ex post facto justification because it comes up after they are targeted.
I've read the site and its clearly trash.
>and the site encourages harassment of its targets
It does not. "Cow tipping" is against the rules. To quote it, it's not "An Autistic Illuminati."
The "harassment" the troony comic maker is getting isn't from the farms, it's from Twitter at large pushing back on him making something so terrible. The farms just has an ear in the crowd and a few gawkers like every other community put there.
What you're saying is as stupid as saying Know Your Meme encourages harassment.
>And when they are, that's typically used as a Ex post facto justification because it comes up after they are targeted.
I genuinely want to know what delusional paranoia drives whatever insane conjuration of how you think a thread is made on the site.
>can't make a thread without receipts and mod approval on the person
>somehow the homosexualv who claims to read kf thinks anyone can make a thread on anyone.
>They're kinda nazi adjacent
No, they aren't. Stop listening to sex pests. Their most prominent subjects right now are leftist because the left is in the mainstream and a troony is wasting tens of thousands of dollars trying to shut them down.
They have threads for right-wing e-celebs and grifters that have a shitload of traffic. They have people that go into LGBT content creator threads and believe their progressive shit but don't like the e-celeb. They have schizos like HollywoodHulkHogan that shit up political threads with Reddit-tier garbage.
homie, I've read the site. They're crazier than the people they stalk.
Kiwis post receipts. You've yet to post anything other than seething.
How is keffals or kf's receipts relevant to this comic by a different person?
You're the one who tried to pin pushback against the comic on the "crazy nazi farms."
I said some harassment probably came from there (and /misc/), since the artist mentioned nazis. I didn't say that was the only source of the pushback (and neither did she).
No, you said it was because of them.
If you die "because of" a bullet to the head, a knife to the chest didn't do you in.
Something can have multiple causes.
Okay, but that's not what you said.
That wasn't me.
> sure b the people posting literal instructions on grooming minors are bad but you know who is even worse?
>the ones collecting evidence!
Which groomer channel do you hang out in?
>Which groomer channel do you hang out in?
>It does not. "Cow tipping" is against the rules. To quote it, it's not "An Autistic Illuminati."
>The "harassment" the troony comic maker is getting isn't from the farms, it's from Twitter at large pushing back on him making something so terrible. The farms just has an ear in the crowd and a few gawkers like every other community put there.
>What you're saying is as stupid as saying Know Your Meme encourages harassment.
Alright if you think the purpose of the site isn't cowtipping, I have a few questions for you:
Why does the site allow doxing, if you aren't supposed to contact the lolcows? Why do you need their phone number and address if its just a gossip site?
Why has Josh said he wouldn't ban people for posting stolen social security numbers, credit card numbers, and passwords? Why does he allow revenge porn on his site?
Why has he refused to punish people on many occasions for cowtipping? Why has he refused to ban users who in the process of cowtipping have commited what he describes as federal crimes?
Better question.
Why do you think it's OK to draw fetist fap material using someone else's child as your model?
whataboutism.
I don't care about who kiwifarms stalks. Some of them are nasty, some aren't. There's defeinitely been infighting there.
This should be a simple question to answer. Stop dodging it.
Why do you think it's OK to draw fetish material of someone else's child?
>Why do you think it's OK to draw fetish material of someone else's child?
I don't. Where did I say I believe that?
Now answer my questions.
You're not the troony that said it was just a drawing?
Second question then. Why shouldn't the evidence of groomers not be collected when they post it in public online? Why are you so interested in making sure they are protected
That is not the purpose of KF, and other sites allow you to do it as well. Being a groomer isn't required for having a thread there. And just being a groomer isn't going to be enough to get a thread.
The thread has hit bump limit and will soon fall off the catalog, so go and answer my fricking questions:
Kf documents lol cows, simple as. So many of them are perpetual coomers turned groomers that is only natural to collect receipts on them.
KF provides a public service by exposing shit like goonclown and the early porn indoctrination to minors (both happen to be trannies) that no one else reports on.
Why are you so insistent on letting these degens operate? Are you a groomer, or gooner?
>Why are you so insistent on letting these degens operate? Are you a groomer, or gooner?
I am against grooming.
Now answer the fricking questions.
Really? You seem pretty damn insistent on letting them groom in peace because how dare people pick on poor lgbt.
How many discords do you hang out in? Willing to guess many.
concession accepted
Concession accepted that you defend groomers? Wierd thing to say but you do you man
I answered your whataboutism question, I said I'm against groomer
Yet you refuse to respond to my questions:
NTA, I'm the one you asked.
You got answers. Good on you for at least trying to give proof for one of them, though.
>Now answer the fricking questions.
...in fricking pol.
I don't give a frick if you, or the dude you're arguing with thinks that cow tiping is nazi light or a moral imperative, but this shit really doesn't belong in Cinemaphile.
Can you rephrase that in the form of a comic?
Fair enough. This shit feels like either a pol or a leftypol raid.
honestly bait threads dont belong on Cinemaphile either
tbph you will never be a real woman
Imagine being lower that a jannyv that does it for free. How do you get this pathetic?
If the purpose of the site is to fight against groomers, zoos, and sex pests and such, then why does the site allow threads on people who are none of those things?
And why does it allow stuff that encourages cowtipping such as this:
>if the purpose of Cinemaphile was an anime message board then why does it have sports?
How fricking moronic are you?
>If the purpose of the site is to fight against groomers, zoos, and sex pests and such
Nobody said it was, just that those were the most outspoken people who wanted the site's hosting revoked.
Trannies deserve every bad thing that happens to them and then some.
Your aren't asking in good faith judging by the number of loaded questions, but I'll play along.
>Why does the site allow doxing
Doxxing is just more information, like a picture of the subject. It serves a purpose besides enabling bad actors. If the subject is broadcasting illegal activity (i.e. the monkey torture rings), this gives something for people to forward to the authorities (this isn't cowtipping since generally people are smart enough to NOT tip off the subject they're reported). In terms of low-stake subjects, it gives context for when said subject blogs about their personal life and/or makes drastic accusations (i.e. a hypothetical influencer claiming to be run out of their home state posting a video later at a McDonald's where they live), which get extra egregious when grifts are involved.
Besides that, dox can also be used to dig into a person's criminal history, so think something like the classic "male 'ally' actually has convictions for rape."
What I find cute, though, is that you seem to think there's a 1-to-1 for dox and harassment, as if everyone who's ever donethis troony's definition of "harassment" had anymore information on him than a Twitter handle.
>Why has Josh said he wouldn't ban people for posting stolen social security numbers, credit card numbers, and passwords?
I really need proof on this one.
>Revenge porn
Same, but without urgency.
>Why has he refused to punish people on many occasions for cowtipping?
I love the weasel wording here in "many occasions." You know it does happen, but isn't always met with an immediate ban.
If the offense is small enough, people will overlook it. Something like WoggleBugProductions getting tipped to make a 30 secknd video saying "the Wogglebug is gay" will get a warning from the staff, but aren't drastic enough to warrant banning.
>federal crimes
Again, more proof.
>I really need proof on this one.
/threads/should-kiwifarms-allow-doxes-of-financial-info.154234/page-2
>Again, more proof.
Look at the yandev thread where the guy hacks into his email
>Thread
"The law is specifically regarding facilitating financial crimes. If someone posts FIN and then encourages people to use that maliciously, that would be deleted. If someone posts that they've already used it maliciously, I think we'd just publicly ban that user and retain the post. It makes less sense to delete evidence of a crime than to retain it so that the proper legal mechanisms can react to it.
So in short, numbers are the same as names and addresses and photos. If you're so sloppy with your personal information that you're leaking FIN, I can't bottle that for you even if I tried. I can only discourage people from doing anything illegal and ban people who do."
Did you even read your link?
>hack
I deliberately left out the email one because I don't have a clear personal stance on leaks/hacks and don't like general answers for that type of thing. I don't agree with it, but don't want to be the one to decide that everything from a hacked password should be forbidden forever
>Did you even read your link?
Do you? How is what he said defendable?
Why should it be acceptable to post someone credit card number or social security number on a gossip site?
if you are against cowtipping, why the FRICK would you want information that sensitive on your site?
I'm not against bad things happening to trannies, because trannies are evil. I hope every bad thing imaginable happens to them.
Well, uh, at least you are honest with your self and the world.
If trannies didn't circle the wagons to protect every pedo, groomerband molester on their ranks then it wouldn't be like that.
Anyone remember the father in Loudon county who get placed on a domestic terrorism watch list because he had the audacity to goto the school board meeting to get justice for his daughter who was raped by a troony?
Pretty sure didn't get placed on a domestic terrorism watch list, he just got harassed by school board. It wasn't a troony, the rapist was a weirdo kid the daughter was dating.
>lies
>lies
>lies
No it wasn't a troony. Just s guy crossdressing. And it was totally consensual even though the daughter said it wasn't. And not a watch list just armed federal agents showing up and arresting him
I hate you lying homosexuals so much. All you do is excuse the worst of your side.
I didn't say it was consensual. I said the rapist used to date her. Spousal rape is a thing, and so is intimate partner violence.
And this justifies the school defending the rapist and sending federal agents after the father because?
You don't think it's fricked up that your first reaction was to masher up excuses and play defense for rapist?
I'm not defending the school. I'm nitpicking the accuracy of your description.
I'm sure you had the same principal stance when it was the "nazis" of givesendgo who had their info leaks for supporting Canadian truckers.
I've never heard of that.
Those truckers are good guys.
Trannies are bad guys.
I hope that clears up this simple issue for you.
>How is what he said defendable?
You said he won't ban people for it.
He said he probably would, and keep the info there to forward to authorities.
Are you moronic? Why are you incapable of going one post without pulling this bad faith presumptuous garbage?
His site allows, and encourages you to sign up via TOR.
Sure its good to forward information to authorities, but why wouldn't you hide the post from normal users or make the thread visible to mods only?
He had to use tor because trannies were fricking with his site on clearnet.
He's always encouraged and allowed tor on the site, even before the DDOSes.
Why wouldn't you want to hide leaked SSNs from normal users?
>DDOSes
A host seizing is nowhere near the same as a DDoS.
>His site allows, and encourages you to sign up via TOR
Yeah, because of a persistent campaign from a transexual who wants proof he called rape "accidental consent" scrubbed from the internet, so he went after employees of various hosting aites and network companies to attack the site.
TOR isn't evil. TOR is basically just proxies upon proxies, and using the onion site prevents users from having their information stolen from the clearnet site getting hacked.
It's two a twofold countermeasure because of a teanny's harassment campaign.
Why wouldn't you want to hide leaked SSNs from normal users?
>So in short, numbers are the same as names and addresses and photos. If you're so sloppy with your personal information that you're leaking FIN, I can't bottle that for you even if I tried. I can only discourage people from doing anything illegal and ban people who do.
Read the links you posted, homosexual.
Do you seriously think having all the information needed to commit identity fraud in a single place, in a thread where hundreds of users are calling someone a degenerate who should die is a good idea?
He's assuming it was leaked and is easily available.
Sure he can't affect stuff outside his site, but he can control what's on it. making information available in more places makes it more likely to be misused.
>in a thread where hundreds of users are calling someone a degenerate who should die
You are absolutely delusional. Ignoring how moronic every part of that is, that is not at all how the site works.
Do you really think people are going to post a random SSN in HOPES that someone will commit identity fraud instead of just doing it themselves? Please, think for literally five seconds before you type.
>Platitudic bullshit
Frick off...
>I deliberately left out the email one because I don't have a clear personal stance on leaks/hacks and don't like general answers for that type of thing. I don't agree with it, but don't want to be the one to decide that everything from a hacked password should be forbidden forever
The hacker was active in the thread and the other users were egging him on, the only person who was punished was a user who called it cowtipping:
https://ghostarchive.org/archive/f3dXH?wr=true
Yeah, like I said, I'm not a fan of blanket answers on that. It sucks and crosses the line imo, but if it doesn't actually harm the target, and the target frequently talks about their email, there's a counterargument to be made that info from it can be posted.
This is a very thin line between leaking info and harming the target. Yandev is probably a creep. But there's a lot more examples like this of questionable shit.
I'm probably not going to have time to pull them up before the thread dies, but the thing to remember is that this is connected to why people hate kiwifarms. There's a reason why the site has the (deserved) reputation it has in the media.
>Yandev is probably a creep.
It's not a "probably," hence I'm not willing to step up to defend him.
>(deserved) reputation
No, it has the reputation because they called out trannies among other cows, and trannies are the media darling.
Nobody gives a shit about YandereDev getting hacked, they care about some with long hair calling themselves a "she" getting "harassed" for being transexual (...and selling homemade HRT brewed in his bathtub).
I hated the site long before I knew who keffals was.
The site has gangstalked chrischan for over a decade. Chris was always low functioning, but having a spotlight on him and the morons who swarmed him only made things worse. Janke and other trolls wouldn't have targeted him unless the site made him infamous.
Yeah dude, you were totally an oldgay, but somehow think they were the people responsible for Chris Chan.
Give me a break, dude. You're full of shit, and if this thread wasn't on its way to archive I'd give you an autistic history lesson on CWC verses the internet so you could at least LARP as an oldgay with SOME authenticity.
I know that the website was named after how chris mispronounced cwc. I also know it was Something awful who found him first. KF still played a massive role.
So now a site is heinous if it partook in mocking CWC... workable backpedal.
So are you ready to leave pretty much every large social media site out there, including this one?
Kiwifarms main purpose is stalking/harassment. They openly encourage doxing.
Most other sites will ban you if they catch you doing that. Cinemaphile absolutely will ban you for raiding and doxing. Twitter and facebook will also ban you, but their moderation sucks and they dont have enough mods on their teams so it will take a while.
I like how instead of actually addressing the argument, you're back to trying to repeat your mantra.
>Most other sites will ban you if they catch you doing that
Try it.
Make a storytime thread for Asperchu and see if the jannies ban it. Make a CWC parody video on Youtube and hold your breath until it's banned. Yeah, it's not dox, but most of the shit on Kiwifarms is shit besides doxxing, it's people taking the piss out of screenshots/videos from a cow.
The fact is that pretty much the entire internet grew a fascination with CWC. Trying to lambast kiwi for it is absolutely moronic selective outrage.
I think that reality tv is also garbage. I think that look at this weirdo shows, like tiger king are cringe garbage. I like to avoid that nonsense. I think weird parasocial nonsense is bad.
If that stuff was taken down I dont think id miss it.
I don't think everyone on kiwifarms is engaged in doxxing or harassment. Some people are just lurkers and curious. But the main purpose of the site is to mock people and dox them. The site would be better off not existing, and most users would be better off doing something else.
Every person who cries about kiwifarms is exactly the type of person who deserves to get doxxed and harassed.
Normal people do not attract that type of attention.
>I think that reality tv is also garbage
Okay, but that's your opinion, and nobody was talking about reality tv.
>But the main purpose of the site is to mock people
True...
>and dox them
False.
>The site would be better off not existing
Okay... but that's your opinion, and I don't recall asking.
Doxing lolcows is effectively one of the purposes of the site. They have guides on how to do it. Null has said that he's not budging on allowing it. It's always added to the OP of threads.
>is effectively
Do you have anything to say that's actually concrete instead of this conjecture shit? I have places to be.
>Okay, but that's your opinion, and nobody was talking about reality tv.
My point is that youtubers making some video about asperchu or whatever, are like the less awful version of KF. Still garbage usually, just not as bad.
>Youtubers like
You didn't mention any of that. You're going off on random points hoping something sticks.
>Still garbage usually, just not as bad
Okay, but a lot of them do pull info from the farms.
When I mention "Asperchu," I'm talking about a specific parody comic that you can just make a thread on here if you really want to test the CWC-"harassment"-permission.
>Probably illegal
Dude, he said he wasn't aware if it was. How can you misread your own screenshot? Are you reading ANYTHING before posting it?
Normie sites only ban you if you go after left wing targets.
Trannies are mad that kf allows it. Simple as
>Same, but without urgency.
He literally describes it as extortion and points out that it is likely illegal.
Tbh farms now are mostly the most loneliest of losers. The website will always have it's lurkers but seeing people complaining constantly about the content of a streamer and any time they talk about something liberal, kiwis have to trauma dump about it... Also name gaygin'.
Everything is a crime according to someone in the farms. That's Nazi behavior.
I'm sorry someone with a kiwi pfp insulted you on X.
We got a farms user here.
Yeah, so I know what I'm talking about here. Frick off.
No you don't. You kiwigays have no self-awareness.
Nice projection, but you're pearl clenching through redditisms while on Cinemaphile while white knighting on an e-celeb thread about a homosexual that wants victimized for being an butthole with no social awareness.
For the "good guys", it's strange you need to hide away anonymously in a shady hugbox.
You would be scared to death if your info was posted on kiwifarms. Ask yourself why that is, if kiwigays are such conscientous, measured and upstanding citizens.
I wouldn't, because I'm not a troony pedophile.
You clearly are, and projecting these faults onto everyone else.
Then link your social media and I'll make a post about you on kiwifarms.
Only trannies and groomers use social media
Hth
Okay, here you go.
https://twitter.net/ErinInTheMorn
>.net
>he says while posting on anonymous Cinemaphile and hanging out with groomers and trannies on private servers of discord
>more butthurt kiwigays
Ouch, I hit sore point it seems.
Your weak moralist pretenses kinda falls apart after reading just a few farms posts. The only ones convinced your aren't in it to simply live out your sadist streak are yourselves. There's a reason Cinemaphile is still around while kiwifarms continuously gets pushed into the recesses of the internet. Cinemaphile is about discussion, kiwifarms is about harrassing targets deemed acceptable.
But you didn't pussy out!
>.net
>Cinemaphile is about discussion
Different anon:
Spurious at best there.
>Cinemaphile has a larger kill count then kf
>is a morally good place for discussion even though it used to host cp and gore
>can't fathom the idea that not every one uses social media because they are internet addict
The level of delusions you have explains why you think you are a woman (even though you never will be)
>Cinemaphile has a larger kill count then kf
And facebook has bigger kill count than Cinemaphile. It's almost as if the size of the userbase matters.
>is a morally good place for discussion even though it used to host cp and gore
and yet you are here
>can't fathom the idea that not every one uses social media because they are internet addict
Name and address is fine too
I never claimed to be a good person. I'm just hear to laugh at you. You're the homosexual trying to spin your cp hoarding site as a good place because it doesn't harass groomers.
No. You're playing interference for a troony rapist. I guarantee if it was sone right-wing dipshit you wouldn't be so pedantic
Can't wait for you homosexuals to be swinging from lampposts. Disingenuous, rapist defending, child grooming enabling fricks.
>I never claimed to be a good person.
Then what moral ground do you have to harrass anyone?
Because it's funny.
What grounds so you have to defend trannies making fetish pictures of other people's kids?
Bullshit. Stop telling lies on the internet. I've seen how your homosexual cohorts act.
>Bullshit. Stop telling lies on the internet. I've seen how your homosexual cohorts act.
How am I lying?
He was chased by someone who was threatening to kill him. He only fired as a last resort.
I don't think he should have been there, but it was absolutely self defense.
Based.
Never happened and trannies deserve it.
>Because it's funny.
So you concede that everything I've said is true then. Nice.
>What grounds so you have to defend trannies making fetish pictures of other people's kids?
See what you kiwigays don't get is people don't hate you necessarily because you're attacking trannies and pedos and whatnot.
People are just disgusted with seeing your demented, sadistic mentality on full display. People get uncomfortable knowing there are such malevolent individuals around.
>People are just disgusted with seeing your demented, sadistic mentality on full display. People get uncomfortable knowing there are such malevolent individuals around.
But enough about the LGBT hedonists...
Zero self-awareness.
No, it's pretty apt to describe you b***hing about a site that primarily documents lolcows
>People are just disgusted with seeing your demented, sadistic mentality on full display. People get uncomfortable knowing there are such malevolent individuals around.
Wait. I thought you were malding over kf not LGBT.
>See what you kiwigays don't get is people don't hate you necessarily because you're attacking trannies and pedos and whatnot.
>People are just disgusted with seeing your demented, sadistic mentality on full display. People get uncomfortable knowing there are such malevolent individuals around.
Basically this.
I'm not shedding any tears over some of the targets. But i've seen people doxxed on the site for briefly interacting with a lolcow or being related to one.
A lot of the users would be lolcows themselves (and some of them are found that way).
>. I guarantee if it was sone right-wing dipshit you wouldn't be so pedantic
I absolutely would. For instance, I think rittenhouse is innocent (albeit a moron).
NTA but correcting isn't defending. If you're seeing it as a "defense" you're revealing that you saw your own framing of the issue as an attack on trannies. You're upset because the facts don't line up with what you're trying to do.
>ablooo a blahhh abloooo
Looks like we got a psych 101 drop out homie here.
>kid raped
>father complains about the lack of justice
>gets arrested
That's it. And of course you homosexuals will twist yourself into a hundred directions to justify it going "ackshually...."
The only reason why is because it was a troony that did the raping.
The kid was convicted for the rape.
His mom says he wasn't a troony or genderfluid:
https://archive.is/idmjf
I do know the school was iresponsible, and they are being sued. source on the dad being placed on a watchlist?
>I'm not a troony. I just wear a skirt and say trans right for funnies
I swear you people are either the most gullible morons or purposely obtuse mother frickers around.
Straight non-trannies say trans rights. Just say he's like one of those predatory male feminists. Why is this suddenly so hard for you to understand?
>must defend skirt wearing, female bathroom entering troony at all cost
>must defend rapist trannies
And I'm sure the Tennessee troony shooter wasn't actually a troony in this case. Crazy how you homosexuals will then claim every historical and fictional character is a troony based on even less circumstantial evidence.
There's nothing to justify, the action was bad. And yes, when it comes to complaining about a lack of justice you can find yourself expressing intent to murder. I'm not familiar with the story but you keep trying to reduce this to the point that a mass shooter was just practicing his 2nd amendment rights. People are so mad that they were just firing bullets.
>in not familiar with the story
>but I still got something to say to defend troony rapists
Frick. Just because you can post doesn't mean you have to post
No one has to do anything. Are you autistic?
>stilling calling this defending anything
You're autistic.
>doesn't know the story
>still insists his opinion is as valid as everyone else
Are you moronic or a child?
k
>it's strange you need to hide away anonymously
You're attributing more virtue to it than I, but I'll bite - do you know what a "whistleblower" is?
>You would be scared to death if your info was posted on kiwifarms
"If." Lol, what a meaningless point.
I'm not a lolcow, and I have the self-awareness to avoid becoming one. I'd be scared, but less lf the autistic illuminati and more that I'm turning into a sperg.
>Ask yourself why that is?
"Ask yourself why, in this scenario I imagined, you would agree with me!"
Wow... compelling point there...
The problem is that you're going to bat for the Farms, bro. That's a terrible look. We all know they're not Nazis but they're still losers and freaks for name gaygin.
You don't autistically stalk some random troony with 10 followers on twitter in your spare time?
Remember to archive all her tweets for future generations!
Actually, no. Man... I mean I got other shit to do with my life...
Damn you are autistic
>Person with a functional life that keeps them occupied
>Officially autistic
Damn, this is how I learned about who I am.
>terrible look bro
I know you're used to pulling this shit on Reddit, but you forgot where you are. If you want to talk optics here, I'm not the one making hysterical sermons about a site I know jack shit about, unlike you, so I'm comfortable here.
Meanwhile you have nothing to actually say here because you know absolutely nothing about the site other than "it bad." Instead of giving examples or giving any proof, you're throwing shit at a wall like "they hate blacks and are Nazis," shit that most people on this site have heard a million times over as a direct accusation to ourselves (who do you think comic writers blame when their runs fail?).
You have no business being here, homosexual. Return to Twitter or wherever you're from.
This thread made it to bump cap and never got nuked. Jannies must be at work. Why aren't you in school?
Check out the kiwifarms thread on her. It's full of people saying she has talent and should draw more relatable comics.
>do you know who would criticize me?
>a NAZI
It's kiwifarms and /misc/.
Trannies usually think that making "feminine" things make them women somehow. For most of them that usually means wearing a dress. It's funny that this one put all his effort in being a whinny b***h.
needs more context. It could easily be sarcastic "Yes I know this character is a jerk".
Keep in mind at this point, it seems she was already getting harassed
>everyone not agreeing with me is harassment
I hate moralgays
Cal is literally new guy
People got even madder about this when they realised the art supplies place she depicted was an independent store that sold supplies at cost to support artists.
Lol this guy's a professional animator and directed some episodes of Velma
I'll give him this, he certainly acts like a women.
https://archive.fo/ZfUmw
point here is she has responded positively to some criticism.
>https://archive.fo/ZfUmw
OUGH TINA
Because people criticizing the comic were making the same assumptions you're making. Even I thought the she was reinventing her persona into a fursona because I got my initial info from people like you on Cinemaphile.
YWNBAW
>YWNBAW
Yes, and?
>The shoplifting one was fine.
You are moronic.
The worst part about this comic is just that it's unfunny. The setup has nothing to do with the rest of the comic, the puchline is simply "thing happened" and half the comic is pointless filler getting to the awful punchline.
The actual punchline looks to be "I'm so sneaky, clever, enlightened, and relatable."
Maybe if he'd been shoplifting from Walmart or something and not a fricking no-name art supplies store.
That's just a dick move.
The shoplifting one was worse because even if you think it's magically harmless to the profits of all art supply stores which you want to assume are all megacorps, you still put the employees at risk for not stopping you or letting it happen.
The artist stated she doesn't shoplift, she just thought it was a cute comic about a "punky" artist.
>The artist stated she doesn't shoplift, she just thought it was a cute comic about a "punky" artist.
Anon's simping hard for Mallory, I hope she sees this bro.
What?
I heard that but it's still bad because of the risk to employees. I'm not going to make that my main political issue or harp on it more than necessary, I just think trying to make a "cute" comic about it is a huge misstep.
Employees steal more than customers steal. 'Theft' is also a blanket term and covers miscounts and things just getting lost. Companies still profit despite this. Most companies also practice wage theft in some form. Stop sucking off corpo, theft is only bad when its a mom & pop that hasn't been found guilty of corruption
It's still REALLY stupid to admit it though.
As if you're somehow justified in going it when your art looks like that.
You can steal the tools, but it's not going to make you a better artist... Let alone a better person.
Frickwads like you are the reason we now have blacks storming stores with hammers in packs of 12 or more. If they were still scared a gun may blow their low IQ head off they wouldn't frick around.
No anon, i am not the singular reason for systemic racism causing black people to act the way theydo.
Most petty theft is carried out by white people.
>systemic racism
Apparently nobody is responsible for their actions in this thread.
oh except those who would dare complain. They need to learn empathy
I want it reversed
Yeah, it takes a voting bloc of you morons placing politicians who let you steal hundreds of dollars in property and get a slap on the wrist with no jail time.
That's mostly because the prison and court systems are tied up due to lack of funding. Funding courts and prisons is unpopular enough and there are marketable causes to run on so they often fall to the wayside, the private sector not really picking up the slack with prisons.
We need to turn prisons into profitable ventures and then increase laws
I think everyone in this thread can agree being a wigger is also bad.
Poverty causes theft. But some people steal shit they dont need or when they dont need cash.
I worked at an art supply store. the customer base were the most entitled fricks you can imagine. If "the man" dragged this troon out and beat the ever loving shit out of her for shoplifting, I would applaud.
The richest people will steal shit all the time. I know that for truth. They'll spend money on expensive items but then pocket something for 2$.
Yep, and a lot of them came into the art store. We weren't selling medicine for sick children.
>Poverty causes theft
and lack of sex causes rapes. you know what to do, right?
>and lack of sex causes rapes. you know what to do, right?
This is infact an argument thats been made for porn being legal.
what about child porn for pedos?
Easy there, Sophie.
>porn for me but not for thee!
you're just forcing pedos to commit sexual assault against minors against their will (since lack of sex causes rape and lack of wealth causes stealing)!
if only there was some counter-argument to that! but can you imagine living in a world where individual actions have consequences and having an entire part of a brain just for restraint and/or possession of moral compass would cause Black folk to stop stealing and vandalizing shit? i sure can't.
The issue is CSEM/CP requires exploiting real children.
But people have infact made that argument about e-girl/shota hentai being useful. (I dont know if it w or not)
Its not.
How long before you go from e-girlsho to 3d e-girlsho to irl cp?
Slippysloppy
counter-argument: no real life kid will have skintone as smooth and pussy as nice as 2d e-girl. 3dpg.
e-girlgays will not be spared the noose
Shotachads, we win again.
>The issue is CSEM/CP requires exploiting real children.
it's like you missed the fact that DRAWN child porn is illegal too. or that dall-e exists.
who gets hurt in a lisa simpson r34?
If its illegal, how come this site is still up?
You joke, but a lot of countries are trying to change both parts of that.
The child in 5 years when the pedo wants the real thing and not his hand + fantasy
so literally a fricking pre-crime. why don't we chop every guys' dicks then, since they are just one bad day away from a rape spree?
>it's like you missed the fact that DRAWN child porn is illegal too.
Uh oh, Anglo detected.
you got me, jolly good mate. wanna smoke a gay wif me?
Head down ass up anon. You are asking for it
kek
>only one person can disagree with me a time
Your only method of refuting the opinions you don't like is to change the context or even change what's being said. Being a b***h in a comic is different than being dogpiled on twitter.
>dogpiling on a Cinemaphile thread is so horrible
The dogpiling happened on twitter. If it were just a Cinemaphile meme we likely wouldn't still be having this thread.
>dogpiled on twitter.
it's fricking twitter. calm down Anne Frank
Couldn't you say the same about the people complaing about this comic then?
No, we are complaining right here. You do understand the difference between twitter and Cinemaphile, right anon?
Not that anon, but I don't. Its all websites for people to express their views and comment on other views. If someone doesn't want "dogpiling" aka other humans simply expressing their view, watch what you put out there. nobody is smashing down anyone's doors to arrest them
>No, we are complaining right here. You do understand the difference between twitter and Cinemaphile, right anon?
harassing someone on twitter is worse than complaining about them on Cinemaphile.
Calling someone an butthole isn't harassment.
what? people are allowed to complain about things.
No, complaining is inherently israeli and you are appropriating my culture which means you are anti semitic which means you are hitler
Somebody help im being holocausted
So, whats wrong wtih complaing about dogpiling?
nothing,
but nobody has to give a shit about "dogpiling" especially when it's just people expressing their own view.
>MULTIPLE people think I'm an butthole. this means I'm even more RIGHT AND and a victim
After a certain point, like if you have 1000s of people screaming at you, it's indistinguishable from harassment.
1000s of people saying
>Wow, you're an butthole
Isn't them screaming at you.
If you can't handle words on a screen then just log the frick off of Twitter.
Ok, its not literally screaming. But if you get 1000s of comments insulting you, its hard to be distinguishable from harassment.
>If you can't handle words on a screen then just log the frick off of Twitter.
A lot of people need to use twitter for their jobs. Not a viable option.
Most people aren't sociopaths. If you follow them around insulting them for long enough, they will get annoyed and flip out. And if we say its just words on a screen, then they have no reason to criticize her.
>But if you get 1000s of comments insulting you, its hard to be distinguishable from harassment.
No, it's not, because you can just log off and never see any of those comments ever.
>A lot of people need to use twitter for their jobs.
Then make a new account, which is literally what this artist did multiple times since they've made an ass of themselves multiple times.
Anon's saying "screaming" because it's less pathetic than just saying that the guy can't handle 1000s of random nameless people on the internet calling them an butthole.
its hard to be distinguishable from harassment.
actually its' quite easy if you don't make your entire identity your twitter page
>A lot of people need to use twitter for their jobs. Not a viable option
No they fricking don't you lying homosexual.
I'm sure they're saying "screaming" because nothing is really "heard" when using Twitter and people were more aggressive than just calmly stating you're a bad person.
not unless they came though the screen like Poltergeist
see
"screaming" is a figure of speech when applied to text, not a literal descriptor.
you said "more aggressive". Like I said unless they came through the screen it's just words.
>it's just words
Tell that to the guy on /misc/ who got arrested by Sheriff Chadwood.
did the Sheriff arrest the troony too?
You need to have actual problems if this is so intolerable to you.
Humans are social beings. Most people are not sociopaths and will get bothered if you insult them repeatedly. Whether in person or via long distance communication.
>Most people are not sociopaths and will get bothered if you insult them repeatedly.
Well them being bothered is their own problem, if they're so bothered by it then they should log off so they don't need to see it.
Or maybe just make an effort to be less of an ass so people won't have any reason to dogpile you.
Most people need to use the internet, and sometimes people will get harassment at their phone or email.
The comics are pretty polite compared to a ton of stuff online.
People make way worse comments online without being harassed. Its just a random idiot who was unlucky enough to be the 'victim' of mob mentality.
>Most people need to use the internet
No offense, but if you can't live your life without using Twitter, whatever you're making probably isn't very worthwhile.
The guy was an idiot, he posted comics of an butthole and then got offended when people called said character an butthole.
That's not harassment, white people have fricking destroyed that word by trying to turn every instance of someone disagreeing with them or saying they're a jerk into harassment.
>most people arent sociopaths
Uh have you ever played a video game?
>Uh have you ever played a video game?
That's just getting assmad. Not the same as being a sociopath or being emotionless.
>gatekeeping sociopathy
you mean insult them on twitter under the comic they made where they insulted someone?
better get out of the entertainment business if you can't take negative reviews. especially, again if you dish it out but can't take it.
>you mean insult them on twitter under the comic they made where they insulted someone?
>better get out of the entertainment business if you can't take negative reviews. especially, again if you dish it out but can't take it.
So, is the new guy a real person? Did she directly send this comic to pewdiepie?
>Did she directly send this comic to pewdiepie?
I'm sorry, are you implying that being an butthole only counts if you do it directly to the person you're targeting?
Are you moronic?
Is there any difference between insulting someone who isn't present, and saying it directly to their face?
Does that difference somehow make you not an butthole for doing it?
>Does that difference somehow make you not an butthole for doing it?
Yes. One can legally be harassment.
Legality is irrelevant, they both make you an butthole.
And the guy got shit for being an butthole, it's that simple.
Leaving a shopping cart in a parking spot and committing murder both make you an butthole.
Are they morally equivalent?
Pay attention kids, THIS is what a false equivalence looks like.
This homie just tried to compare murder to insulting someone to their face.
I'm not saying they are the same thing. My point is that Just because something is rude, doesn't mean all rude things are equally bad.
The legality does infact matter here.
There's a reason why harassment is a crime, and insulting someone in private when they aren't there isn't.
>and insulting someone in private when they aren't there isn't.
Except insulting someone when they aren't there CAN be a crime, it's called libel.
oop my mistake
>Libel is communicating a defamatory statement by writing or picture, while slander is defamation by oral or spoken communication.
>Except insulting someone when they aren't there CAN be a crime, it's called libel.
Wrong.
First off, libel and slander are torts, but they usually aren't crimes.
Secondly, they require more than merely opinions. It's not about insulting someone, libel and slander are about spreading falsehoods about a person.
You aren't going to be liable for calling a third party something like a fricking moron or a stupid butthole in many conversations.
You'd be liable for slander/libel if you spread lies about them molesting children, raping people, committing adultery, and so on.
If you repeatedly sent a person messages insulting them, you could become criminally liable for harassment.
>First off, libel and slander are torts, but they usually aren't crimes.
Stopped reading there.
You're moronic.
Only 24 states have criminal laws against defamation.
https://www.aclu.org/issues/free-speech/map-states-criminal-laws-against-defamation
Now it's "repeatedly"
so I guess were done with the "dogpiling"
It wouldn't be a crime, unless it was directed by a single person.
But to the target it would feel similar.
no it wouldn't
again. It's the response to an (insulting) opinion the person itself put out. Don't put your own crap out there ON TWITTER, if you don't think you might get some back
Because ITS TWITTER.
Its an online app. She didn't have to read word one of ANY of it. There is nobody shouting at her or doing anything "aggressive". It's words on a page that can be block or delete. Without reading one word.
It is not your hugbox. You can't put your opinions on a public forum and then cry "victim" because you're not getting only the complements. Are you 2 years old? why does this have to be explained to you?
Unless you want to stop using twitter, turn off comments, or turn off notifications, you kind of have to read the response to your post.
And there's a difference between constructive criticism and dogpiling. Twitter users and Cinemaphile users are mostly incapable of being useful.
>Unless you want to stop using twitter, turn off comments, or turn off notifications, you kind of have to read the response to your post.
I don't know if you're agreeing with me or not because yeah, The problem here is that troony's on the wrong site if she doesn't like how Twitter normally functions.
I'll say it again because someone has a think skull. It is not a hugbox. It is not designed for that. Nobody HAS to give only constructive criticism and "dogpiling" is a bullshit word because you're saying people can't post after, what? 3 previous comments or something? Got a lot a rules here all because some CHOOSES to read shit other people post.
posting comments on twitter isn't harassment
and publicly insulting people even if it isn't to their face can be construed as slander
>posting comments on twitter isn't harassment
It can be.
but isn't automatically. troony getting negative feedback wasn't a crime. It's a normal day on twitter
A single person making fun of another person while they aren't there, is not the same as thousands of people insulting someone to their face.
>to their face.
IT'S FRICKING TWITTER
fricks sake go outside PLEASE!
It's a figure of speech.
Let me rephrase
A single person making fun of another person in a comment they will never read, is not the same as thousands of people insulting someone in direct replies to their post.
and it's still not harssment. it's still not anything to be acting like a victim over. It's standard use for sites like twitter.
You know a great way to avoid it. Get off of fricking Twitter. It's not your hugbox.
NTA, but comparing two cases by a given precedent is not false equivalence. In fact, claiming difference without actually demonstrating how is a fallacy called "special pleading." That, and trying to attack someone for daring to make an argument you don't like and pearl clenching over it is just a b***h move that makes you look like you don't have an answer.
Unironically yes. Hell leaving a shopping cart in a parking space is worse than murder and offenders deserve 50 life sentences in the worst prison available
She put it a public page for anyone to read, just like the commenters did.
They all did the same thing. one can't harmless and the others all "harassment"
>She put it a public page for anyone to read, just like the commenters did.
This is disingenuous.
Did she tag pewdiepie on twitter or respond to his posts directly?
>disingenuous
that word always rears its head sooner or later
why does it matter. It's fricking twitter. it's how the site works. DONT put your dumb ass opinions on it if you don't like blowback, you baby
These were the comics that invalidated themselves. I get maybe making your protagonist into an butthole is the point, but is there even a punchline? No, just the author feeling validated making people feel inferior to them.
Imagine if the other characters where poc?
>saying you're too b***hy and snarky to be friends with someone who doesn't understand the concept of laughing at bad things happening to bad people
>anonymous guy was denied friendship from mean troony
This isn't even particularly bad. Its unfunny and b***hy, but "I'm not going to be friends with you" sounds like she's doing him a favor.
>pears
I dont get it
Are you the guy who posts pears in trap threads on /b/?
Reminder that her fanbase tried to frame a guy insulting her comic by grooming minors on discord
>thinking twitter counts as social interaction.
theres you problem. People who actually interact with living humans on the regular basis can tell you what real harassment and dog-piling is, not this shit.
Reality is a dlc for twitter
I only brought it up because someone was equating what's put in a comic about anonymous people and a public mass response on twitter directed to an individual is different. You don't even have to see it as bad or wrong, it's just obviously different.
Oh no, people were mean to an butthole on the internet!
Quick, someone alert the authorities, it's the consequences of my own actions coming back to bite me in the ass!
how does making a bad comic make you an butthole? I'm pretty sure they got doxxed and threats over the new guys or the shoplifting comic.
>how does making a bad comic make you an butthole?
Making your self-insert an butthole and then defending everything your self-insert does when people say "wow, this character is an butthole" tells me that said self-insert espouses your actual views.
As such, you are an butthole.
>doxxed and threats
everyone gets "doxxed and threats" when they want to play victim.
The problem is this artist hurts capitalists and wagies and that's bad
>I don't read too much into that antagonism because I'm used to more aggressive push backs on this site
That's a good point. This sort of remark is totally tame, compared to half the shit that gets thrown around in peaceful discussions here.
hiiii ^-^
im trans btw
Would be funnier if the im trans speech bubble came from the coffin
Can I tell you a secret?
Most of human history is incredibly sexualized, it's not just now. You're just used to living in pockets of ultra religion that repressed it for a bit
Most of human history also involves tons and tons of rape, which was the vast majority of said sexualization.
Yes and?
Those were different times, with different rules
>Yes and?
And you probably aren't looking to get raped, are you?
The artist is a literal troony. They don't understand how real women naturally act and speak.
Neither do you satan, trannies and Cinemaphile go hand in hand
Frick off. Troons go together with bleach and ammonia.
Trannies and nooses? Yes
gays think everything is about them. They can’t imagine someone doing something fun without including some homosexual for participation points.
Why do straight men like playing victim so much? Is it because its still relatively new in current century?
>gays are taking things away from ME
>women are divorce raping ME
>women wont frick ME
>me me me everyone must suffer because ME
>Straight men
I’m a woman, a biological woman
breasts or gtfo
Women are the gays of men, you're just as bad
Lol, the turnaround this gay made was lightning speed.
>anime shit
Women think everything is about them. They can't imagine someone doing something fun without including some woman for participation points.
>gay triggered by anime
Like clockwork.
>make a strawman
>accuse others of strawmanning
okay where was anyone complain about "divorce raping?"
>she
men shouldn't pretend to be women
gays love anime, it has the best gay shit
As usual once you trigger a woman, they're on you like a personal crusade. Is it your period?
4 years later and I still want to frick New Guy.
In a gay way or a straight way?
Gay
New Guy is just max gilardi.
You want to frick max gilardi
>sweet beans man
>purple hair
>eyelashes
Did >she just misgender a character in >her own comic?
When you call someone "man" it's generally a gender neutral term. Like "dude" or calling a group of people "guys"
>man
>gender neutral
No that patriarchal normalization bullshit. If you call your pussy pals 'guys' or 'dudes' you are verbally raping them into submission
Another case of trannies knocking LGB acceptance into the shitter
Its TTTT
LGBs already have equal rights. It's time for trans* folx
Why do people keep referring to the pink haired man as a "her"?
Everyone who reads the new guy comic pretends they identify with new guy even though b***hy troony is literally them
How would younlike it if you were harassed?
Everyone deserves empathy
>even though b***hy troony is literally them
But I'm a big fat tall black guy with short hair, new guy is literally me except white.
>Say something stupid
>People call you stupid
>"Help, I'm being harassed!"
Sorry, that well's pretty dry by now.
Everyone deserves empathy
Someone shouldnt be harassed because they said something stupid, they should be educated on why it may have been foolish to display that opinion publicly.
You're trying to justify being an butthole because "youre not them" and that's not a smart position to hold. You may want to rethink your stance.
see
Again you are trying to justify why it is okay for you to be an butthole just because someone else was. That is not a wise position to hold, anon.
If all the other anons were jumping off a bridge, would you?
I wouldn't jump off a bride because I actually think about my actions and the consequences.
It's also why I wouldn't be an butthole unless I was prepared for other peoples retaliation. I certainly wouldn't be an butthole and then play a victim screeching how everyone else needs to have empathy.
Nah, sorry anon, this is just someone suffering the consequences of their own actions.
If you don't want people to call you an butthole, don't be an butthole on a public forum like Twitter.
Also, the other anon is right, no one deserves empathy, you earn empathy, same with respect.
Everyone deserves empathy anon. You think that way, clearly because you have not experienced empathy in your life or someone in a position of power taught you that way.
Do you walk down the street and see someone suffering and think
>WHAT HAVE YOU DONE FOR ME LATELY
You need to unlearn your hateful tendencies. A better world isnt built on nothing
>Everyone deserves empathy anon.
Nope.
Then you think you dont deserve empathy? That's a bit of a sad outlook
No one deserves empathy, empathy is earned.
Thinking you deserve something for existing is peak sheltered suburban behaviour.
Do babies deserve to be fed by their parents?
Do babies deserve to exist?
answer my question. You told the other anon, no one deserves anything just because they exist.
Does that apply to everyone in every case? Or only to some people in some cases.
Answer mine first, do babies deserve to exist?
Don't clam up now because the obvious answer would conflict with some other beliefs that you likely hold.
Sure.
Ahh, a pro-lifer, how commendable.
answer the question
Yes, babies deserve to be fed by their parents because parents need to take responsibility for their actions (including bringing a life into the world).
No
Babies need to earn their existence by manipulating reality to force a compatible set of genes together.
Babies also need to earn being fed by proving they're not completely parasitic deadweights. Unfortunately results don't manifest properly for 18-30 years
I'm sorry for your life anon. I hope you can learn to live better
I hope one day you'll grow to be less sheltered.
I'm not holding my breath though.
Being able to see the good in the world isn't being sheltered.
Everyone deserves empathy, even you anon-kun
One day you will see the light
Only being able to see the good and not the bad is the definition of being sheltered, anon.
But, you wouldn't get it, you're white, so I understand.
Ngl, as someone whose hung out around liberal activists, the non-white ones have way more chill. Like, you can see them getting visibly uncomfortable when the self-loathing white girl who clearly just wants to be a part of something starts talking and says a bunch of insane shit about how much she hates herself for being the white devil
White liberals tend to be neurotic self-hating weirdos, and no one likes that.
Non-white liberals vary more, the chill ones will just be normal people who just don't like big corporations and banks fricking over the average person, while the narcissistic annoying ones will be the type to constantly grift about race (and are usually themselves from quite wealthy families) while ignoring every other issue, or worse, being corporate shills themselves.
Don't worry anon. Someday you seek grow up, no longer live in your parents basement and understand how the real world works.
I hope you get there
Anon's not damanding empathy, then trying to reframe that want as altruism.
>Do you walk down the street and see someone suffering and think
>>WHAT HAVE YOU DONE FOR ME LATELY
you're just making all kinds of random leaps.
Maybe it should be
>Do you walk down the street and see someone being an butthole?
>then I might think, "hey that person's an butthole"
>Everyone deserves empathy
No, (you) do not. Even if people did, everyone has the right to revoke that empathy anyway.
You're demanding people overlook your moronic tantrums and value your worth above their own judgement, and then try to shame people for not playing along instead of realizing how egocentric that is.
I'm talking about you and the artist specifically here, not trannies as a whole, although the irony in it also being applicable is not lost on me, given how many years we've heard the same and overlapping crowd chant "freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences."
>you are a troony for disagreeing with me
That's projection, hon. But i forgive you.
Don't be a dick - jesus
>Projection
No, projection is attributing a trait of yourself onto someone else. I'm not a troon. I'm comfortable in my body. You're meanwhile ticking off way too many mental flags from troons/homosexuals I've talked to on here.
Why should I be empathetic to someone who wants to call me something as horrible as a transexual?
>literally making shit up
Even schizos deserve empathy
>deserve
>deserve
>deserve
The entitlement
It's not, it's a standard. Reframing base level society stuff as "entitlement" to make it negative isn't anything you'd do consistently.
where is it written that people deserve empathy?
I don't need to pull out religious text or legal document because it'd still be based on beliefs and standards.
Argumentation like this makes it valid to sell killing your neighbors and taking their stuff as a get rich quick scheme. It is correct, but it's largely detrimental advice for everyone involved.
I'm NTA so I can see that "deserve" isn't a useful thing to say when people want to be autistic, so "should have" is better framing since it frames it more as a suggestion than a basic building block you may not agree with.
But I know where it it written not to kill. In multiple places in fact. It also makes logical sense to support a society and philosophy where killing is considered a crime and for people to say they have the right to life.
and can't say any of this about empathy. Nobody automatically deserves empathy especially when they don't give any themselves like our little troon.
You wanna be empathic, have fun. You have no place demanding that of anyone else.
Things don't need to be written anywhere though. You don't have to agree with laws or religious texts and searching for the word empathy, looking for that translation isn't productive because at that point we're just putting a lot of work into appealing to authority.
In other words, it's just you that decided "its a standard" as opposed to your personal opinion.
I don't know what you want to call it or how you want to spin it. It's the stuff that keeps society together. You don't need laws or a religion for a community, but being part of that comes with the idea of having and recognizing standards.
I want to call it your personal opinion. because that's all it is. Stop acting like it's law and telling people what they need to have.
How old are you? Most know that when people say "standards" in this context they aren't talking about written law.
they also aren't talking about something one jackass on Cinemaphile just decided.
The reason we dont go around killing people is because we have empathy.
The reason people run soup kitchens and churchs give out to charity is because of (mostly) unconditional empathy to their fellow humans.
Being an butthole costs me nothing
>Being an butthole costs me nothing
It easily can cost you. If you go around insulting your boss, your coworkers, your neighbors, then your life will become harder.
people are free to have all the empathy they want.
It's the "deserve" part that is tripping you up. No body is required. nobody MUST give empathy to other people. It's my God given right to hate everyone on Earth and you have no right to demand empathy of anyone.
That's what your doing. Demanding people think a certain way. That's why were calling you entitled.
You, too, are an butthole.
It's not, you're not understanding the use of the word here. It's like you're going to seethe about how saying "have a nice day" removes your agency to have any sort of day you want. "We hold these truths to be self evident" is assuming everyone needs to hold those same truths.
no it's like the initial claim way back here
everyone doesn't deserve empathy. Thats it.
you're free to give her all the empathy you want. no else has to.
real simple concept, didn't need you posting 50 more times about how everyone DOES deserve empathy which sounds like a requirement to me.
Yes anon, these truths aren't self evident. Have a good day.
whatever.
nobody deserve empathy
That's cool.
>The reason we dont go around killing people is because we have empathy.
Pretty sure it's actually because any loon that did go around killing random strangers would quickly be hunted down by armed people who thought they'd be next if they didn't.
>The reason we dont go around killing people is because we have empathy.
Please cool it with the antisemitic remarks
>The reason we dont go around killing people is because we have empathy
Actual slippery slope argument.
There's an argument to be made that keeping a small group of individuals close is beneficial to an individual since it ensures mutual benefit. Any person outside of this group is 'fair game' and rival groups are often targeted for disdain. Ignoring little things called "war," "pillaging," "mass rape," when was the last time (you) chastised someone for being a "redneck"/"flyover", etc? Hell, earlier religion got blamed for disgust with the sexual movement on social media. That's pretty disrespectful to anyone who might hold a spiritual belief that lacks those traits, isn't it, but yet you're silent...
The formation of those groups typically requires empathy for those around you.
>when was the last time (you) chastised someone for being a "redneck"/"flyover", etc?
Never.
>The formation of those groups typically requires empathy for those around you
Correct, you can be selective with empathy. That does not entitle everyone to it.
Let it sink in for a moment that the guy who typed
is now comparing "I'm entitled to empathy" to "It would otherwise be legal to kill your neighbors" based on... absolutely nothing except... empathy being entitled isn't universally-sourced.
Its not okay to kill your neighbors
It IS okay to gaslight your neighbors into crossdressing and killing themselves
Let it sink in that I wrote "NTA". Your post is a product of a complete lack of reading comprehension, possibly on purpose.
>Let it sink in that I wrote "NTA".
I simply think you are lying.
Then simply state that instead of just looking more clearly mistaken but at least capable of correction.
>Then simply state that instead of
I can do both and word my posts to reflect that.
Everyone in this thread is an autistic bot. Let that sink in.
Entitlementgay
>Projection is thought to be an unconscious process that protects the ego from unacceptable thoughts and impulses. Attributing those tendencies to others allows the person to place themselves above and beyond those urges, while still being able to observe them from afar.
No... I don't think I'm making anything up here.
P.S. Love how quickly you hypocrites were to start using "schizophrenic" as a buzzword. Congrats on contributing to the stigma against people suffering from mental illness while demanding respect and empathy for your own...
Prove im a troony
The way you type clocks you.
Wrong :^) im just a gay man.
That's what I said, a troon.
Seething
Yes you are.
>haha throwing these stones is fun!
>oh no I cracked the walls of my house!
Literally every online addicted troony
Good lord, what an absolute c**t.
He certainly has perfected being a catty b***h.
>Im such a victim
Welcome to the world of being a woman.
Sure ain't what it's cracked up to be.
An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind
meanwhile, only the innocent people are blind
I genuinely wasn’t expecting a thread like this to be filled with people trying to defend this c**ts shitty ass comics. Like where the hell were all of these defenders at when the new guy comic came out?
At this point, I'm convinced it's the troony itself. I mean, what the frick else does it have to do all day?
>nobody deserves empathy
The only people saying this are people pretending to be edgy because of le anonymous on the internet
Muh no consequences means you can pretend to be an butthole even though you have the same beliefs as me.
Kind of sad you cant be real with yourself but its okay since i win in the end
Sorry anon, not everyone is as sheltered as you are, we didn't all grow up in silver spoon gated communities.
>im being edgy for teh lulz
>I'm extremely sheltered
I steal from Walmart everytime I go there, thats what happens when you have 1 teenager watching over 10 self checkouts.
Well Cinemaphile?
It's just a drawing
Ask me how I know you are a child predator
You're projecting, like most pedos
because it takes one to know one?
>is just a drawing of someone else's kid taken without permission and then used as fap material. What's the big deal?
Kys homosexual
Weird as it is, I see the shit Cinemaphile likes, they have no right to complain.
That doesn't look traced at a glance though the pose is similar. (it definitely could be traced, but I wouldn't say for certain. You need to do an overlap to check).
>e-girlgays: this shit i fap to is just a drawing and not problematic but this troony drawing children is problematic and le bad
those are the same people
Usually you see them fight on twitter, but I'm sure there are troony e-girlcons. The Onimai anime series (not Cinemaphile) is probably an example. Whoever made picrelated is probably another.
I would be severely concerned if the e-girlgay artist was permanently expressing interest in being with children and teaching those children that their parents are wrong and they must listen to him instead. But unsurprisingly the one who checks all those marks is the troon. :/
You will find the venn diagram of the two groups is a perfect circle
Cinemaphile is one person.
>Cinemaphile is one person.
Yes we are.
YOU'RE ALL IN MY HEAD ARENT YOU?!!!!
It's funny because an adult man drawing himself as a little girl definitely means that it's those parents who are wrong.
Its funny because rent free
>Enter a thread dunking on troony webcomic maker
>troony webcomic maker's identity is about being a troony
>"R-r-rent free!"
Maybe troony should make other shit besides indulging his fetishes.
Even Dobson tried to draw more than lesbians and inflation.
>troony troony troony
One note
>One note
the comic is called "Assigned Male", but yes, it is.
Well?
It's funny how they made the people they're upset with sympathetic.
shocker
Well?
so true
I still can't believe this person has fans and seems to be taken seriously as some kind of activist
just among other pedos
The Assigned Male wiki page is hilarious, it's so widely planned and they're so desperate for positive reviews that they start quoting some random person's matters thesis in the reception section
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assigned_Male
Bicalutamide is a medication used to treat metastatic prostate cancer, and one of its side effects is that it feminizes the bodies of men who take it, including the appearance of breasts. It's prescribed off-label (as many drugs are) to transgender individuals as a puberty blocking drug. Among other side effects like juvenile osteoporosis being common in other puberty blockers, (which may or may not be reversible) one of the side effects of using it is liver toxicity.
Still have never heard a convincing argument as to why homosexuals and trannies should have access to other people's children.
They seem to think it's their right to groom
This entire fricking thread
All it takes to get 500 notes sometimes is a lolcow and autism
Everone is ENTITLED to empathy you stupid fricking chuds
Even Hitler, khan, bin laden, and John Wayne gacy?
ESPECIALLY Hitler, khan, bin laden, and John Wayne Gacy
It means that LGBTs can only relate with other LGBTs.
Only IM allowed to have opinions.
we all know how much Jessica hates hypocrites.
didn't knew he was a HunterxHunter fan
what are the odds this guy's just trans because he wants to be a "lesbian"
>men are so awful, not like us ladies RIIIIIGHT?
the only time i saw someone sitting on the bus like that, it was a woman.
HA! Nailed it!
>Attracted to pussy
>not attracted to wiener
Correction is needed.
For the troony (MTF), I mean.
>the joke is literally "women owe me sex"
>drawn by a man
All it takes for incel behavior to be seen as admirable instead of creepy is a wig and a dress?
No. It will still be seen as creepy. You just get institutional protection. Same way criticizing shit in the middle east gets treaded different depending on which political wing and race you are. .
You should have more empathy for stupid fricking chuds. I'm not going to call it an entitlement though.
How strong is the virtue or grace if it's only shown when it's easy?
>Well?
Well, I think you and possibly this entire thread have no intention of being part of Cinemaphile and might do better in pol.
Well well well?
Fricking hell. This is what porn addiction does to a homie. They can only think in terms of sex
>failed men's last escape
>turning into a troony
checks out
Honestly, seeing more of this person's comics, they definitely are a giant butthole, and I'm surprised there were people here defending them.
Every single one of these comics gives off major "entitled butthole" energy.
>Honestly, seeing more of this person's comics, they definitely are a giant butthole, and I'm surprised there were people here defending them.
>Every single one of these comics gives off major "entitled butthole" energy.
If you use Cinemaphile you should love that.
Here's the thing. People aren't going to post the good comics. They are going to selectively choose the worst ones, and post screenshots of when the author responds the worst because of whatever is going on.
You ARE Jesscia, aren't you?
>If you use Cinemaphile you should love that.
That sounds like projection, I use Cinemaphile because I'm a pervert, not an butthole.
Maybe you white anons are here to be among buttholes, but I'm here to bro out with my e-girlbros (and occasionally shotabros).
You should stop simping for this person, they're clearly an butthole.
>I use Cinemaphile because I'm a pervert, not an butthole.
Most people here are both. Or used to be anyway.
Times have changed. Now the buttholes aren't perverts. Or they pretend they aren't anyway.
This person counts off like someone who would an utter horror to deal with.
It's kind of hard to find examples of harassment on the shoplifting comic, since the original post has been deleted years ago:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200409030913/https://twitter.com/goy288/status/1247982793335824385
I'd just describe this as rude and kind of moronic.
Oh god a Shrek meme. Those monsters.
Like i said, its just rude and dumb. Not actual harassment.
I know for a fact she got actual harassment, but its hard to find anything other then somewhat rude clapbacks.
Basically, the worst harassment isn't going to get a lot of likes, unlike funny clapback comics, so you have to dig through replies to find it (unlike the artist who gets all the notifications in their inbox).
That becomes much harder to do when the original post gets deleted, since a lot of archive sites dont work properly with twatter.
Trannies should always be bullied to either changing, or suicide, and any amount of bullying is less than they deserve.
See this is why we say farmers are Nazis.
You say farmers are nazis because you're a marxist.
>troony wants to joing into lesbian fun as soon as it hears someone might be gay
I thought that was the protagonist
troony comic