Lynch could film a bowl of soup for 2 hours and people would say it is profound and meaningful
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Lynch could film a bowl of soup for 2 hours and people would say it is profound and meaningful
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
This is probably his most straightforward movie besides Elephant Man
Oh yes dear boy *huffs fart* I must say I agree! Just look at the artistry of depicting fear of fatherhood by putting a little woman with paper mache cheeks inside a radiator! Stupendous! *sniffs flatulence*
>Paper machet-cheeked women inside a radiator are actually a neo-noir commentary on the postmodern dialectic! It has meaning and you are a pleb for not being a pseud like me!
not enough car chases and explosions for you?
It's just unsettling and terrifying. Real horror. You're just a pleb.
Lynchfiltered. Couldn't be me.
Devote yourself to twice daily TM practice, or be cursed to the black lodge for all time, OP.
Let me guess, it made you feel uncomfortable and confused and that's a bad thing because it wasn't some straight forward Marvel slop.
Yet he never did that.
Unsettling and gorgeous movie with clear themes. Is it profound, really? Probably not, but the subject matter most likely affects certain people more, not childless losers.
Seems like lynch is saying child havers are losers
he has like 5 kids dipshit
Yeah but watch Eraserhead, he's clearly saying child havers are losers
Your interpretation is flawed and hastily-formed, perhaps?
>Unsettling and gorgeous movie with clear themes. Is it profound, really? Probably not,
My interpretation is clear cut, what do you think it means?
I think it's about the fears of a new Dad and the temptation to Black person your way out of it and just be a deadbeat.
>Black person your way out of it and just be a deadbeat
Well that's what happens in the movie, and it seems like a happy ending to me
That tells me all I need to know about Lynch's thoughts on parenthood
same people who said "Zappa could mix a fart to stereo and I'd buy it."
Redditors love doing that, and all his fans are reddit, so...
>Height of popularity in the 90s and early 2000s
>All his fans are reddit
The height of his popularity was TP season 1 when one took him seriously, instead realizing he was a meme who was only notable for being weird. Taking him seriously as a film maker is a very modern and reddit thing. Funny how you thought you were being clever, but only proved yourself a fool once again. Many such cases among redditors.
>the height of his popularity is when I was born and I desperately need this to be the case reddit reddit reddit reddit PLS REDDIT REDDIT REDDIT PLSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
If you were born in the early 90s, I feel bad for you.
You write like a groid.
Academy awards aren't an indication of quality and the fact that you think they are shows how much you need to mature.
>You write like a groid.
Deduced that from a 5 word sentence, good job moron! You try too hard to sound smart on an anonymous imageboard, many such cases on here. Keep it up it will surely distract you long enough from your miserable life.
>can't reliably use capitalization or punctuation because his parents were shit and raised a man of poor character and habit
the ironing
Obviously not a guarantee of quality, but there's definitely a correlation--which you haven't refuted at all--so I don't know how *I'm* the immature one when you're talking out of your ass.
Who do you think is a "serious filmmaker"? Odds are, they've praised his work.
>the reddit space
>the belief that Cinemaphile is just like reddit and you're owed a refutation
No need to refute anything when you do all my work for me.
It's funny that someone getting all precious about "le Cinemaphile etiquette" thinks they can call anyone else immature.
Yr gay
>it took her 15 minutes to come up with THAT
Took a posting break to watch "What Did Jack Do?"
Pure lynchkino
you sound like a moron
The elephant man was nominated for 8 academy awards in 1980. What does "being taken seriously as a filmmaker" mean to you?
I watched this in art school and got in trouble for saying it was moronic and meaningless
What do you mean by “got in trouble”?
>>>>art school
The only David Lynch film I’ve seen is Dune.
Don't bother with the rest. He's a snake oil salesman. All style, no substance.
idk, this c**t manages to make both weird and uninteresting movies
Eraserhead is an absurd comedy, bro.
LYNCHED
Hahaha.. you frickers actually think this scary? Are you guys moronic?
>t. a literal ugly mexican teenager
>Lynch could film a bowl of soup for 2 hours and people would say it is profound and meaningful
Yes.
Its not even that challenging or esoteric. If you're seething over this you'd struggle with actual art films.
i don't like plebs and morons that think their opinion is worth shit
Lynch is to film as Seinfeld is to comedy
it's just a Kafka take on The Gold Rush you fricking casuals
I love most of his movies but eraserhead is shit. Haven't seen elephant man
Kubrick loved it
pleb
The best part is that lynch has specifically said multiple times that there is no meaning behind the movie, its just style over substance, but pretentious homosexuals keep reading into it
You don't know what you're talking about. There is a whole universe of middle ground between Sherlock Holmes autist putting together a hyper literal puzzle and totally incoherent pure abstract expressionism. There is very clearly identifiable themes and a narrative throughline, filling in the gaps and your emotive reaction to the imagery, not all of which has meaning, is where personal interpretation comes in but there is no denying the paternal anxiety basis, it's not just noise and random images
>filling in the gaps and your emotive reaction to the imagery, not all of which has meaning, is where personal interpretation comes in
You could look at a wall or a cup and have this same experience you pretentious moron.
You really think you said something there don't ya
No one said you need to give credit or even attention to anyone's interpretation, but the OP here just reeks of seething that people other than him even HAVE one.
what a beta
In that case it's a very ugly movie, in style and story
>reading into it
That's called viewer interpretation. Sometimes I think the filmmaker is a moron and I disagree with him on what his movie is about.
>style over substance
What is substance?
I have not found anything online that mentions this so unless you prove otherwise you're one of those homosexuals who purposely makes shit up and spreads misinformation hoping no one looks into it
You are 100% correct. The movie is garbage but Lynch made it and people can't stop sucking him off.
I'll be damned if I spend another cent on a lynch film
I misread your post as bowling for soup and got nostalgic