I don't understand how we got to a point in society where watching someone get scalped and mutilated while screaming for their mother is entertainment.
Even if it's fake, or fake looking, the idea of it is still sick.
Why are there a frick-ton of Reddit-tier YouTube channels gobbling up the next gorefest and "enjoying the kills!" but when there's a sex scene in a slasher?
Oh, that's offensive!
People getting eviscerated in increasingly realistic ways? Well that's heccin' awesome! Based! Look at the gore! Oooh I bet she's gonna get the cheese grater to the jugular, how badass!
But breasts? Erm, that's a bit awkward. Didn't age well, right guys? At least we're educated!
It's fricking stupid, and I'm tired of it.
No one goes around rating the top ten rapes in movies, because that's fricking deranged.
But we can go around and rate top ten kills, because, "it's fake! it's acting! it's special effects!"
Frick it. It's moronic.
I miss when horror was monsters and zombies and the deaths were impactful and not "heccin' sick!"
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
So do you want non-PC or not. Because this sounds like hyper-sensitive woke snowflake shit. It's a movie.
It’s just weird that horrific violence is ok to glamorize, right?
>WEIRD! WEIRD!
I dislike the idea of Terrifier but not necessarily because of the gore - I’ll look at the REKT threads of /gif/ sometimes and see irl gore and literal death.
I think that the level of gore in Terrifier is distracting and over-the-top. Like that one scalping scene from the second movie is a whole 30-60 seconds of nothing but gore. Why? It’s not scary, it’s just gore.
But it is a cartoonish universe with a cartoonish villain so maybe I’m taking it too seriously. Either way it’s not for me and I don’t like it.
I appreciate the gore effects and Art is a great slasher villain but the problem is that Terrifier takes itself DEATHLY seriously beyond the silliness of the gore. Terrifier 2 is two and a half hours long because the director thinks it's deathly important we know tthe backstory of the clown guy or whatever and how the 40 year old woman pretending to be a high schooler is actually the chosen one or something
>Terrifier takes itself DEATHLY seriously beyond the silliness of the gore
It really doesn't, the entire movie is tongue-in-cheek
He's a clown, you're supposed to laugh
Don't like it? No problem, humor is subjective, find a different clown to laugh at
I think my biggest issue with Terrifier comes down its disregard of genre conventions. Doing something different is fine, that's ultimately a good thing, but some conventions exist for a good reason. Case in point, the concept of rules.
As a genre, one of the core commonalities in horror is the idea that any threat facing the protagonists should operate on basic rules.
>Freddy can kill you in your dreams, but he can't hurt you while you're awake.
>Graboids can't find you if you you're quiet, but they get smarter the longer they're around.
>Gremlins multiply if they get wet, but can be killed by bright light
>Jigsaw will throw you into a death trap, but he'll give you a way to survive
>Zombies aren't very fast or powerful, but they can only be stopped by destroying their brains
The rules governing the threat are what provide structure to the story, inform what the dangers to the protagonists are and how they can be overcome or how characters may fall victim to the threat, and cue the audience on when tension should build-up or be released.
This is a concept that goes all the way back to classical folklore and mythology - vampires, werewolves, ghosts, demons, etc. all have rules governing what makes them dangerous and under what circumstances, but also how to survive an encounter with them. All of which gets down to the probable cultural reason "horror stories" exist in the first place - the need to teach members of the community the rules for survival: Don't go into the woods, don't go off alone, stay by the fire, etc. etc., which was likely facilitated by sharing terrifying tales of what happens to people who disregard the rules.
Art, as an antagonist, doesn't appear to have any rules or limits, and if your antagonist doesn't have any rhyme or reason or limitations on what he can do, or who he can victimize, or under what circumstances, then it makes it difficult to scare your audience effectively.
Brain dead take. I bet you think you could be an actual movie critic huh? Start a YT channel and prove it, pussy.
Nah. I'm content to share random takes on a Malaysian fruit basket arranging forum.
All fair points.
>Art, as an antagonist, doesn't appear to have any rules or limits
That's what makes him great though. It's like a back to basics version of a meta-slasher.
Refuses to provide backstory. Refuses to have a weakness. Refuses to show humanity. He's an inevitable perversity, YET hidden in plain sight because it's Halloween. He's like a Junji Ito character.
I saw AHE and Terrifier 1 when they came out and really enjoyed T1 because of how no frills it was. Mainstream critics hated it because it lacked a story, but defying those critics was the aim.
>He's like a Junji Ito character.
ur a gay
no u
Its cos ure a pussy
>still crying about slasher movies in the year 2024
Give it up already. Do you still cry about Doom and Mortal Kombat too?
No, because video games are for morons.
my brother (who is a burnt out moronic schizophrenic) showed me this movie and I couldn't believe anyone actually enjoyed watching such badly paced mindless slop.
I like synthwave though. Which was nice to hear.
Whoever shills the terrifier movies should be put on some kind of watch list. The very idea of enjoying the death and torture of an innocent person (whether real or not) is a symptom of a mental disorder at best and psychopathic at worst
>The very idea of enjoying the death and torture of an innocent person (whether real or not) is a symptom of a mental disorder at best and psychopathic at worst
It's not real, but there are people doing exactly what you describe to videos of real people dying over on /gif/ right now and you're not crying about them. Why is it worse to watch actors pretending to die than videos of actual people dying?
>Why is it worse to watch actors pretending to die than videos of actual people dying?
I never said it was worse, but on the same vein. Learn to read. Also we are on Cinemaphile not on /gif/. Anyway, someone who enjoys irl gore gifs or the terrifier movies is someone of low iq or psychopathic, that likes gore for gore's sake
Explain why liking fake blood and organs in a horror movie is the same as getting enjoyment from the deaths of real people. That sounds like a psychopathic statement from someone who doesn't value human life all that much.
This is ironic, because posting the same thread over and over on Cinemaphile is almost certainly sign of a mental disorder.
This. The director deserves to be tortured to death, lets see if he still loves it so much then.
its for low iq people, it has no story, its not scary its just boring
I don't even care about the le gore or whatever, these movies are just fricking lame, same for all slasher movies. I agree with
I always thought Nightmare on Elm Street had a pretty good story
>I always thought Nightmare on Elm Street had a pretty good story
It's a great concept executed perfectly. Craven had talent at making some really creepy and eerie visuals and utilized them in ANOES to the furthest degree.
Just look at the opening sequence of ANOES....
?si=6QZiL5RDfn0bJyRC
While I always thought it was a weird choice to have the actual picture start by being smaller than the actual width of the entire frame!!!FACT!!!
>I always thought Nightmare on Elm Street had a pretty good story
It's a fricking gay concept executed even more homosexually. Craven is a homosexual hack who makes zogslop
I always thought it was a kino choice to have the actual picture of the intro start by being smaller than the actual frame though
>Craven is a homosexual hack who makes zogslop
Serpent and the Rainbow is one of the best horror movies I've ever seen. His other movies seem good to sloppish, but Serpent is fantastic.
Somebody needs to read up on mondo movies
How many months are you going to keep having this autistic meltdown?
yeah agree, its trash and if you enjoy it theres probably some mental problems going on
It’s Hallowkino.
>I don't understand how we got to a point in society where watching someone get scalped and mutilated while screaming for their mother is entertainment.
It's a horror movie. You shouldn't be amused, you should be scared. That's where the entertainment comes from, from being terrified. You just watched a horror movie, got scared, and now you don't know what to do with these bad feelings, like a little boy. So you make a thread trying to "fight" the fear. Just relax
Making the clown immortal wssa mistake, it removes any emotion from the film leaving just a borefest just waiting for the next victim to get killed and the viewer stops caring because they know the victim has no chance and will just die horribly, it borders on torture porn territory.
It's a meta commentary on the horror genre as a whole.
Rubber did it better though.
>Rubber did it better though.
Dupieux's true kino is Smoking Causes Coughing.
Why is that an issue with Terrifier but not with Nightmare on Elm Street, Friday the 13th, or Halloween? Most slasher franchises are about immortal killers that can only be stopped by the protagonist.
Because they aren't unstoppable?
Both Halloween and A Nightmare on Elm Street end on scenes showing the audience that the killers are unstoppable supernatural beings. Have you seen them? Only Jason is a true human, but he dies and comes back as an unstoppable zombie part way through the series.
>end on scenes
So there's tension before the film ends. No issue there.
That only goes for the first Halloween, since we already know Freddy is supernatural in Nightmare and we know Michael is supernatural in the Halloween sequels.
Art was human in Terrifier 1 and actually dies, and in Terrifier 2 he is still defeated and "stopped" by the protagonist just like Jason is in any Friday the 13th movie.
It's why Scream is my favorite slasher series, Ghostface being occasionally clumsy and realistically vulnerable makes the movies more exciting because it isn't a foregone conclusion that the girl being chased is a goner.
There are many things that humans find horrifying. One is the human body. How fragile it is, how gross it is with all the organs and bodily fluids. When a horror movie shows a person being mutilated or butchered, this is the fear that it's playing upon. We all think of ourselves as a person. Most of us ignore our own mortality and fragility. Seeing a scene like the one in The Terrifyer horrifys because it forcefully reminds the audience that they are essentially just bags of meat and bones and could be horrifically transformed into something resembling roadkill with little effort or consequence.
tldr: The point of a horror movie is to scare the audience, bloody mangled human bodies are unsettling and scary. If you want entertainment that's not graphic and bloody, watch something else.
Skimmed, not reading all this gay shit. We already had this conversation ad nauseam in the 80s. This movie is gay not (only) because it's gore porn for Reddit IPA drinking homosexuals but because it's yet another bullshit remake of something from the recent past. The moralizing gays though, as always, are the absolute worst. Frick off.
>This movie is gore porn for reddit IPA drinking homosexuals
>The moralizing gays though, as always, are the absolute worst
Wait, so you hate gorey films, and call them "gore porn for redditors", but you also hate moralgays? What did you mean by this?
He can dislike something without declaring it evil and clutching his pearls about it.
What's not to get? I think gore porn for that type sucks and I think people who moralize about it are even worse.
>Frick it. It's moronic.
It definitely is. Just desensitizing the modern audience to extreme violence, and young people seek this shit out because it's supposedly taboo and cool.
You know for centuries crowds would gather around to watch people being hung, decapitated or burned alive, right?
So watching gore films is nothing new while these Terrifier films are trash and not in a fun goofy way like old school flicks like Blood Feast which had a weird cheesy charm to them!!!FACT!!!
People were watching justice being done, they wouldn't exactly have congregated to watch some random being boiled alive.
thats just an excuse freaks use
people watch webms of pitbulls being mauled and soldiers being killed under the guise of it being 'justice' when they actually just like those things
reddit was a snuff website for the first like 6 months of 2022
This, it's like women who watch true crime and pretend it's about "learning so it doesn't happen to them" or goregays who watch it to "see how the world really is". They're not fooling anyone.
what are your favorite reddit subs?
cycle of violence propagates itself.
go clutch your pearls somewhere else, homosexual
>go clutch your pearls somewhere else, homosexual
He needs to pull them out of his ass first!!!FACT!!!
It's goreslop for the Dollar General and Insane Clown Possee demographic
I get you OP. I think the Terrifier movies are trash too. But there's clearly an audience for them. They're not for me either. These films are for people who like to laugh and giggle all the way through horror movies. I appreciate the practical effects, but the movies are just mindless, pointless gore torture porn.
OP is a pearl-clutching gay but he kind of has a point when he said that people are okay with graphic violence, but get angry over sex
It seems more people get upset by violence judging by the constant threads on here crying about it. Never seen a thread crying about boobs.
I just saw a thread this morning with an anon crying about nudity in a French arthouse film being porn.
I see people crying about sex and nudity all the time on here, even more than they cry about gore
There is a world outside of Cinemaphile moron
Fine, but that's been said so many times at this point, for so many decades, that it's beyond cliche.
Should fit right in here then, since this board loves complaining about the same things over and over, like how "woke" everything is nowadays.
>people are okay with graphic violence, but get angry over sex
Yeah and anons are ok with unnecessary sex scenes in movies but get angry over porn.
It's almost like you can make every group look like hypocrites if you pretend it's a single person
OP is 100% right. Being fine with very brutal and realistic looking gore, while throwing a hissy fit over sex and nudity is a sign of mental illness.
The thing I hate the most is that this Kind of stuff was Part of the extreme underground, now ots mainstream. Thats the fricked up thing, nobody forces you to watch pseudo snuff, you actively had to see it out and even then, you couldnt talk about it to any normal Person.
Now everybody wants to watch "le heckin most disturbing movie eva" and watches Serbian film or terrifier or some shit.
Gatekeeping this Kind of stuff is essential
>The thing I hate the most is that this Kind of stuff was Part of the extreme underground, now ots mainstream. Thats the fricked up thing, nobody forces you to watch pseudo snuff, you actively had to see it out and even then, you couldnt talk about it to any normal Person.
>Now everybody wants to watch "le heckin most disturbing movie eva" and watches Serbian film or terrifier or some shit.
>Gatekeeping this Kind of stuff is essential
I think it was when people were recording their reactions to Two Girls, One Cup and posting it was when society reached a new low....
?si=Ws9UZfgzqbZrckaf
?si=ebpD29CHofBKGZsV
?si=WMqVdB8nI4WiQTQs
?si=0k2qzHVA-Zv2KCs-
!!!FACT!!!
?si=9rnYDokPTlfzKSci
?si=qB3OQ3l9X2_HXsCW
?si=J5lSSAsLfA1YY9Oy
?si=V5O3A8pp2zNaCjOo
?si=nXrbLUqeBEpgXwIL
?si=_k0PqmHkjNTYdVDM
!!!FACT!!!
?si=0leQOXYx_yweUw5C
!!!FACT!!!
?si=-djN8lI7DANw2gfc
?si=UGr0pa__M1Amrg8f
?si=7ZCm3KKcCXNgajwW
!!!FACT!!!
>Gatekeeping this Kind of stuff is essential
This, and I think the same about fetishes. This kind of stuff should be like hard drugs, hard to find so only people who really want it have to go out of their way to find it. Having incest porn on page 1 of pornhub and snuff movies in every theater can't be healthy to a society.
What the frick is your picture
Holy kek chuds really do be acting like soccer moms. Anyways, you're like 40-50 years too late to notice the trend
Uh, sweaty, this film is an incel film. YOU are the chud
Boomers were right about violence in media
So you're saying we need less gore and more rape in movies
You shouldn't have been a woman~
You shouldn't have had a c**t~
The more the seed of the nephilim take control of society the more stuff like this will be popular. It is evil and reflects earth before the flood.
Except gory horror is less popular now than it was in previous decades.
Gory horror of previous decades didn’t look like this.
There are 80s slashers like The Prowler and Maniac with more realistic and serious depictions of gruesome murder than a comedy like Terrifier 2. There are gialli like The New York Ripper and Giallo in Venice with brutal sexualized violence towards women where their nipples and genitalia and mutilated on camera.
Getting upset about Terrifier means you don't know what you're talking about.
>and mutilated
*are
I’m not upset about it.
Ever seen Peter Jackson's movies he did before he went mainstream?
>zoomers realize the existence of exploitation slasher films
Slashers have always been for homosexuals and Blacks. !!!FACT!!!
Gore films with no sex?
The west has fallen
>Woah ass ahoy
Imagine being at computers
The #1 rape in movies is still the one with Jodie foster on top of the pinball machine. I must admit: it made my pee pee hard the first time I saw it. Yes, I am ashamed of this, but what can I do? To this day I have to go jerk off to porn right after even thinking about that scene.
It's not funny enough to post so many times. Once was good.
>my image wasnt wrong
lmao thats kind of embarrassing
It's got oddly specific things like the death metal and the porn so I'm assuming you based it on yourself. Still doesn't mean you need to keep posting it.
im agreeing with you, its funny that hes reposting it and referring to it as his own image
Didn't notice you were quoting one of his posts. You're right, that is funny.
He's got serious mental health issues, including wanting to rape kids.
>clown is immortal and unbeatable, for reasons
>victims are stupid and out of of their depth, even if the villain is one-dimensional
>the movie is just waiting to see how the clown kills the next victim with zero resistance
>even if they resisted the clown is God anyway
>B-but wait guys! We're not just a cheap reason for our props guy to show his expertise at faking mutilations and blood...how about this...smaller clown?
>no, she doesn't do much, but it's mysterious, right???
>and they said horror movies can't have depth!
You need to be brain damaged to enjoy this embarrassing garbage
I agree that people who obsess over gore and dedicate their lives to edginess and negativity are mentally ill, but the point of art is to explore the mind and how it reacts to different things. Having violent, gorey, horrible things happen on screen is just a form of art, and it's interesting to explore something extreme like that because people are not typically exposed to such horrible things day to day. Humans are naturally compelled to seek new information to it makes sense for people to have an interest in unusual things like extreme violence, especially when it's delivered in a completely safe, inconsequential way like a movie.
>I don't understand how we got to a point in society where watching someone get scalped and mutilated while screaming for their mother is entertainment.
its not entertainment, its porn.
Explain what's pornographic about this scene
That's like showing the start of a porn and arguing it's not pornographic
Except the movie is
>40% funny scenes
>40% scenes with the main girl
>20% art attacking people, mostly chases and quick kills along with a single prolonged death scene
If you're arguing that the deaths are the equivalent to sex then I don't know who would watch a porno where probably less than 10% of a 2 hour long vid is sex.
you're just describing soft core porn, so a lot of people
Sounds boring
Terrifier sucks dicks
>Got to this point
When has this never been the case? Civilizations all over the globe glorified violence for entertainment.
>You know what's wrong with Cinemaphile these days? Everyone is obsessed with death.
Ethics is a meme there is only ideology and going against the current ideology is always what gets considered unethical in a given social structure. Because the ideology in vogue right now is feminism then breasts in horror is considered a worse offense than gore. Simple as
Fun and comfy film.
Is she wearing double underpants?
Have to make sure not a bit nudity slips in the extremely violent gore scene, that would be really problematic
The scene is genius because it just keeps going at every point you think it should stop. In most slashers the "kill" would have been when he slashes her eye and then it would cut to another scene. In the more violent slashers it would cut after the scalping. After the back stabbing and arm breaking Art stares at the finger like he's going to eat it like we've seen him do before. Instead he rips the hand right down the middle. The scene uses the filming conventions of slahers to make you think the scene is finally going to end after he slashes her neck the blood splatters on the wall and the camera cuts to random objects in the environment, something you've seen countless times before in horror films after the kill scene. And then it just pointlessly and senselessly keeps on going. It's like they deliberately went out of their way to elicit shock and horror in even the most desensitized horror fan
It's meant to be comedic. You've never seen a horror movie that actually tries to elicit legitimate shock apparently (they exist)
Yes, the joy is derived from the surprise. That's how humor works
There's a strong chance they're gonna kill off Jonathan aka Lil Chuddie in Terrifier 3.
Do you think he's gonna make it?
>Terrifier
>A Serbian Film
>Slaughtered Vomit Dolls
>Trauma
>August Underground
>Guinea Pig
>American Guinea Pig
>Subconscious Cruelty
>Philosophy of a Knife
>Grotesque
>The Human Centipede
>The Last House on Dead End Street
>Salo
>Faces of Death
>Traces of Death
>Where the Dead go to Die
>Violent Shit
>Blood Feast
>Evil Dead Trap
>Tokyo Gore Police
>Scrapbook
>Atroz
>The Burning Moon
>Cannibal Holocaust
>I Spit on your Grace
>Revenge
>Terrifier
>Blood Feast
>Evil Dead Trap
>Tokyo Gore Police
>Cannibal Holocaust
>I Spit on Your Grave
These were good.
I Spit on Your Grave is fricking gay, nobody actually cares about da heckin' strong woman revenge. People only like it because of the rape scenes.
I like it because of the kinos 70s exploitation film atmosphere and the cool kills like the one in the bathtub. The rape scene isn't particularly pervy so if you're watching for that you'll be disappointed.
It's a slasher specially made for women, nothing really wrong with it imo
>specially made for women
It's long had a history of being a "misogynist film that exploits sexual violence." Maybe there's some trannies trying to "reclaim it for feminism" now but it certaintly wasn't seen as a film for women in the past.
>Women is le strong and kills heckin' evil rapists
>This is misogynistic
Why were they like this?
Because the first hour before that is the girl being raped and beaten, and then a lot of the violence towards the men is off camera. It's more a shock rape movie than a "girl power" movie.
In my experience it's the opposite, I've seen a lot of women sharing scenes and expressing satisfaction about them for realizing the "rapist gets fricked by the raped" fantasy, but they weren't full feminist, just the boss girl kind, maybe the twitter ones are more prone to what you said
Fedora-wearing redditor cinematic universe, just throw Fight Club and every movie featuring The Joker in there too so it's complete
OP is right, only the mentally unwell like this shit. Then again, look around at society and you'll see nothing but the unwell so it makes sense.
Why is it that pearl-clutching anti-gore Christlarper moralgays only get upset about stilly, tame movies like Terrifier and not about movies like August Underground?
silly*
They have a surface level knowledge of horror movies and the mental image they've built of Terrifier resembles something like August Underground or Tumbling Doll of Flesh.
The violence is fake
They're enjoyed by people with revenge fantasies against women or youth in general. Sane people deal with those by resorting to ridicule comedy/cynicism, crazy people think about violence. Functional insanity is becoming more common in society.
is OP too young to remember the torture porn decade?
Slasher movies have always been sadistic shit. You know these people would use kids instead of barely legal teens if they could get away with it.
Hate to break it to you but they already do kill kids in horror movies, there's nothing stopping them from "getting away with it." The Blob has child gore.
ITT morons without enough contextual knowledge of the horror genre to immediately recognize that Terrifier 2 is a silly comedy movie
To the people who like Terrifier, what do you think of movies like August Underground and Guinea Pig?
Not my cup of tea. I don't get any enjoyment from watching something like that. The most horrific things, ultimately, are things that happen in reality, and if you try to mimic that too closely, horror (as fiction) loses its purpose.
>horror (as fiction) loses its purpose
But isn't the point of horror (supposed to be) to shock, scare, and disturb the audience?
Problem is nobody's disturbed anymore, well not by Terrifier at least. They laugh through the entire movie. It's too fricking goofy.
It depends on what sort of horror fiction is being discussed. Some of it is simply an aesthetic preference, or a means to explore certain kinds of ideas. Other things have a a cathartic purpose in which one can transfer their fear of things that are truly horrible (in the real world) into something that isn't real in a meaningful way.
By the way I would class Terrifier 2 into the "aesthetic preference" sphere, as I think its purpose is having fun playing around with genre conventions and making the audience laugh, assuming said audience doesn't have a stick up their ass and is already familiar with horror as a genre.
Continuing one more time, I won't claim that movies like August Underground don't have a purpose within the horror genre, but it's hard to see exactly what it is, at least personally. You can experience the same sort of emotions from reading certain true crime articles. I think it's telling that this subgenre has always remained relatively obscure and never picked up any substantial following.
>it's hard to see exactly what it is
I think movies like August Underground may be a way to experience gore without actually doing it, and this way showing how fricked up human on human violence is without the romantization horror movies may be prone to (either by themselves or the ones watching it). There's nothing admirable in them, no cool masks, no genius killer, no hot women in a tight shirt. Personally, I am more interested in watching August Underground than Terrifier, and see more artistic merit in the former, as disturbing as it may be.
You may be right, but I'm not entirely sure that's the motive behind them (for example with Japanese works I can't help but think of their genre of "guro" which is gore porn that is intended to jerk offd to). To each their own, though, I won't say you're in the wrong for enjoying such things. Also I would not want to hold up the Terrifier films as an example of artistic merit, even if I do like them, lol.
I didn't say I like them though, and I don't actually, but it's a experience I may want to have someday.
Well you'll certainly have an "experience" of some variety if you do ever decide to watch them.
I guess, but for now I'll stick with "normal" gore. I'm interested in watching Martyrs and The Sadness. The thing with normal movies that don't try to look too real is that they don't let you forget they are just movies, doesn't matter how violent they are. I watched Bone Tomahawk and didn't feel anything special, it's violent but there's a safe fakeness in them.
I really don't get it. Bone tomahawk is one of the few things that really got to me in recent times because of how well acted it was. The hopelessness and frustration of the captives witnessing the gore. Terrifier 2 on the other hand is one of the funnier things I have seen recently just because of how utterly mean spirited and over the top it was. Martyrs is on a whole other level. It's definitely my number one disturbing movie because the atmosphere is amazing and the helplessness and futility is overwhelming.
You're gay and stupid, and no one cares about you irl or on here.
nice projection incel.
You're not fooling anyone
I get where you're coming from, the slow well acted build up and the grounded gore adds to the emotional impact, but what I felt was exactly hopelessness, not shock. I was more sad for them than disturbed.
>what do you think of movies like August Underground and Guinea Pig?
I don't have much interest in watching them. Maybe many years in the future when I've gone through everything in my lengthy watchlist, because supposedly some of the Guinea Pig movies are actual movies and not just gore compilations. Unlikely I'll watch the ones that are just gore.
August Underground seems like it could be too unpleasant to watch but maybe I'm imagining it as worse than it really is.
Beautiful women being brutally tortured turns me on. There, I said it. It’s fricked up in real life though.
it's trashy, yeah
don't let it get to you
Oh no, not a horror movie being trashy.
you're being sarcastic, implying that it's normal for horror movies to be trashy
but notice that I said "don't let it get to you"? the point you raised through sarcasm is actually a huge support for my advice
Three days straight this homosexual is obsessing over gd Terrifier movies. Schizo behavior
This tradlarping shit has really got to stop. And you specifically being hung up on this movie and making thread after thread about it is already lame.
American movies are all about celebrating violence and normalizing it as something ''badass'' and ''awesome broo'', that's why so many american movies are just vigilante fantasies or horror shit
>got to a point in society
yeah because people being entertained by bloody entertainment is completely new and not as old as civilization
We need to ban all gore. Its unnecessary. Outlaw violence in films in general. Its time to start behaving like civilized people instead of brutality idolizing brutes.
>Ban all movies that make me uncomfortable!
Women-like effeminate mindset
I've never seen this movie and I think it looks like utter trash but I'm all in favour of whatever makes people like OP seethe
>No one goes around rating the top ten rapes in movies
I'm sure there are many anons who could list a top ten, maybe even a top 20
its the result of growing anti israeli sentiment and people feeling the need for visceral revenge
Only weird incels watch these movies
It’s the hero your Capitol City deserves
Most normies have violent desires and are one inconvenience away from going crazy and/or/ shutting down
Slasher movies are made to be watched and enjoyed by men alone in a dark room.
not a normie genre
I don't know, man, these torture porn movies have been going on for decades, this just the first one you became aware of. Get over it.
I'm sorry, if you like these movies, you're gay. Like MEGA gay. Inoperable.
but FANS loved this LITTY lil ROMP! #CapitolCityLitty
WANTED: This man is accused of causing MASSIVE BUTTHURT on images boards across the internet. If you see him, please report him to a janny or similar authority.
anyone else love movie gore but hate torture? someone getting sliced vertically in half and then all their organs fall out before their halves collapse is awesome, but someone being flayed is just unfun.
iktf. I just want to see Jason being a badass one shotting people using whatever's on hand
Pseudo snuff films are nothing new and I wouldn’t say Terrifier even goes that far let alone something like a Mondo movie where the “documentarians” are implicit in a real person’s death.
Really Terrifier is just a lame and juvenile slasher series that’s no different than 100 other movies just like it.
For me I don't think gore is the issue per se, it has a place in these kinds of movies. What makes Terrifier kind of stand out is how mean spirited it comes off as.
I can watch something like Evil Dead or even Friday the 13th and there's always an element where you're not rooting for the bad guy. Terrifier is one of the more subversive types where you're supposed to identify with the bad guy and revel in his kills with him.
OP's generalizations are misleading and come off as biased, but there is something about the Terrifier films in particular that rub me the wrong way and I feel morally wrong for watching them and certainly have never gotten any type of enjoyment from the experience.
is that what reddit told you to say?
>Terrifier is one of the more subversive types where you're supposed to identify with the bad guy and revel in his kills with him.
The problem there is that generally only works well when the people getting killed are reprehensible, disgusting, horrible people.
People root for Death to kill people in the Final Destination movies because usually everyone apart from the main character who gets saved during the first act disaster is also a huge piece of shit.
People root for Jason to kill people in the Friday the 13th movies because the people who get killed are usually bawds, burnouts, scumbags, or morons.
We like the karmic schadenfreude of seeing shitty people get whacked. But it's also the same reason why "unfair" or "underserved" deaths tend to rub people the wrong way. When character's who've done nothing to deserve a horrible fate suffer one it's in our nature (most of us anyways) to sympathize with them and feel shitty about it.
you’re moronic if you think dying to a zombie is somehow more meaningful. horrorgays are subhuman.