I give it 10 years before a commercial grade cartoon illustrated solely by A.I is released.

I give it 10 years before a commercial grade cartoon illustrated solely by A.I is released.

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    this is why education whould be reserved to people with actual intelligence, you are a useless moron wasting our time.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >you are a useless moron wasting our time.
      pardon me your highness, I didn't know 4chun browsing was such an important activity as to be disrupted by me.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Your entire career path is about to go the way of candlemakers and manual textile work.
      Better have a plan B.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        the only people who will survive are the artists who find ways to maximize the use of AI

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          this. its just going to fricking accelerate the countless smut artists who all draw the same base generic pinup shit. most of their shit is virtually interchangeable as is, and AI will only make their jobs easier as all they have to do is manually work out the uncanny valley.

          for concept artists and the like, AI will be an incredible tool for them to play with, just basically skipping the more arduous and tedious rendering phases

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Hasn’t that already basically happened? It’s well known that Marvel movies are mostly pre-visualized before a director even gets their ass in a chair. The recent controversy of Marvel being outed as a shitty client because of unrealistic deadlines demanded leads to only one conclusion for Herr Mouse, that the human artists are the problem. What place in the work environment does an artist have when they rely on the computer to pretty much do all their work? At first it’s like “oh this saves me a step” but soon it will be “oh it’s done all the steps, I’m dead weight”

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >he thinks art will be automated away before his own job
        lol

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Judging by the state of things, art will be the first thing that's going to be replaced by AI ironically enough.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >judging by some shit i saw on social media
            ai art gets more traction on social media because it's more interesting than watching a robot perform manual labor

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I want off the dystopia train

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Now figure out how to teach an AI to storyboard, and then how to make assets for that storyboard, and generate animation following that storyboard that doesn't look so ass no one will watch it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Storyboarding is only a reference for artists, so it's useless for AI to make. It's like asking AI to make a sketch of a drawing when it doesn't need to, because it can already output a finished drawing without doing a sketch.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I won't care. I already exclusively watch cartoons made in the 20th century.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >DALL.E getting good at creating art
    >Novel AI to create the scripts
    >TTS is getting close to replicate voices
    How much longer until I can create and revive old cartoons?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I use TTS for modding and it is way more finicky than people expect, we really need GAI to be able to use it efficiently.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's funny how no one mentions you need a data set produced by humans. I have no doubt it'll cause disruptions but if it really made every single artist extinct then after a while you'll have something that only regurgitates the same crap. Don't forget that these bots tend to have restrictions placed on them to prevent them from going into horny territory so you'll get even more sanitized outputs.

    Now that I say that though it's perfect for corner cutting corporations that rely on sequels and old names because they're afraid of change.

    Art will continue to exist as long as people want to express something and connect with other people through that.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      There is a point when an A.I. can train against itself after the task space has been defined robustly enough.

      That's how AlphaGo managed to beat Go grandmasters decades before the estimated timetable.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Go is a closed system with a clear solution.

        I work with AI. I've trained and scripted and sold conversational/linguistic AI. There are some incredibly cool applications for AI but animation is so far off that saying anything about it is utterly moronic on the same level as thinking Siri is a human-level intelligence and not smoke and mirrors.

        In terms of illustration and animation, AI tools have their best implementation here as a way for artists to quickly build references, and even then for most situations they'll prefer an actual 3D model or a posable anatomy figure.

        Stop looking at heavily curated individual images from these startups and imagining that the output is really of that quality all the time. Marketing is always horseshit, double so I'm venture capitalist tech

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    isn't a lot of the weird kids youtube stuff already generated?

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    look, as someone who actually does neural networking projects, here's how it is:
    is AI going to make a lot of artists lose their jobs and create art all on its own? absolutely.
    is it the be-all end-all replacement of artists? no.
    Why? because for an AI to maintain a consistent style or have any style whatsoever, the AI needs to learn from a very large dataset of manually created assets that the neurons in the network can learn from to recognise patterns as a human would. We would still need real actual artists to create thousands of consistently styled assets per artistic project for an AI to even have a chance of doing the work for us, and even then I'd argue it will remain forever cheaper to just make the minimum assets required for a cartoon by hand rather than making artists produce tens of thousands of stylized drawings for the computer to half-guess at a replication. The ability to replicate will only improve as the RAM can hold more billions of neurons to closer replicate the human mind, but my point is that in order to replicate, the AI will always need a data set created by humans no matter how good the AI gets within reason. If, for example, the AI were to get so smart we could actually compete its synapse response with that of a human (we are centuries off of this level of hardware capability), then maybe artists would go the way of the Dodo, but for now they're safe, they just have to adapt their workstyle should a company rely on this AI tech.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Guy who works with AI here
    You're moronic enough to be a fortune 500 executive

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *