>I got your enemies son in my womb, and he will reign in your kingdom

>I got your enemies son in my womb, and he will reign in your kingdom
How would you respond without shitting your pants?

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I respond with "not canon". It is quite literally not what happened historically.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      just kill her lol

      I would listen to her as if I needed her advice. And thats what no one did.

      hardmode: you can't move or speak

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Frick her. She was Edward's wife, after all, not his son's. They changed it for some reason in the movie.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Turns out longshanks was a scanner

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    just kill her lol

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I would listen to her as if I needed her advice. And thats what no one did.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      wish I could pull off Longshanks' hairstyle

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Longshanks throwing the gay man out of the window

      Longshanks did nothing wrong

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >how did it feel defenestrating your own son?
        >I wouldn't know, the only people I've ever defenestrated are gays

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm abolishing the bloody monarchy I am! That'll show the tart what for, pip-pip!

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Nice try, we don't have medical imaging yet. That could be a daughter.

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I would abort the baby by killing the b***h and crown myself the king

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      I enjoyed Napoopan a lot more once I realized it was just Braveheart with muskets

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's an insult to Braveheart.

        Braveheart is a fun flick even if it is comical and not accurate.
        Napoleon 2023 is not any of that.

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    dm; hs

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    she's getting executed, obviously

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      It is not a good idea in medieval society. You need to prove her infidelity to her family first.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        P O I S O N
        O
        I
        S
        O
        N

        What do you mean I poisoned my own wife? What possible reason would I ever have to do THAT?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        They regularly shoved red hot rods of iron up king's asses because it left no obvious marks on the body. No obvious cause of death, no murder. Just a random death that conveniently benefits surviving family members looking to gain.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Hot rods of iron up your ass will kill you?

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Proof?

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            He saw it in a dream

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            It happened to Edward II of England.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              >one example with no sources provided
              >regularly

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                I read Churchill's History of the English Speaking Peoples and he mentions it happening a few times.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's been dismissed by modern historians. I bet you also think they cut off Hugh Jr's dick.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Modern historians also said that the Roman emperor Elagabalus was totally trans and valid, I'll take the word of the guy who beat Hitler over the word of those modern morons.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, totally the same historians. You do realise both are oldass propaganda, right? You only believe Churchill because he doesn't live in the year 2000+24.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                People at the time said it happened, modern historians say it didn't happen because they think it sounds silly. There is literally more evidence that it happened then that it didn't.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >There is literally more evidence that it happened then that it didn't.
                Like what? What historical records?

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                The ones Churchill read that made him put it in his book. Modern historians literally think things don't exist because it sounds silly to them, they have zero evidence to dismiss things passed down other than their own personal prejudices.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >some guy said he read something so it's true
                and i read you're a homosexual

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Seethe more Black person, you're the homosexual here just like those gay modern historians whose dicks you enjoy sucking.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Churchill was a drunk and a joke

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          bro I hate to break it to you but they look at your butthole at the autopsy
          your parents are getting told everything

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          If this actually worked then why don't modern criminals still do it?

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            We have forensics that they didn't have back in those days, plus it also kind of required the new king to tell the people that the body has been inspected and to not look to closely. Even then it didn't entirely work since people still talked about it behind the new king's back, that's how we have the rumors of it today.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              That's a good explanation. Thank you.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Just take her on a hunting trip and say she had an accident.
        That´s how royals used to get rid of unwanted relatives.

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    She was 10 years old you sick frick!

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do nothing.

    Baby proceeds to obviously physically belong to the other guy when born:
    >A queen having a child out of wedlock means the child is illegitimate and invalidates the queens status. You became no more than a common prostitute the moment you accepted another man's seed, and you doomed your offspring to be a child of mud.

    Baby isn't different from the king himself (i.e. looks like the king) when born:
    >My child, you shall everything I will leave for you.

    Ironically, get fricked, queen.

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Throw her in the oubliette until she starves enough to miscarriage, then allow her out only if she takes a vow of chastity so I can send her to the nunnery.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      actually, since she literally admitted her infidelity to me, I wouldn't even need to do any of this. I could just have her stripped of title and sent back to her family a prostitute while I get a new wife.

  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Oh no. My wife died in childbirth. It's a shame, but also very common.

  13. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Unironically this is the best argument to choose a republic instead
    >kingdoms are for weak men
    >demo(n)cracies are for women
    >republics (obviously aristo/meritocratic) are for strong men

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      republics are only good for a few generations. any "merit" the men who founded their patrician houses will be pissed away as the heirs slowly but surely become more degenerative and inwards-focused.
      The real strong man's government is one that doesn't exist, or its incredibly small scale tribalism.

  14. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Write down a note. Have her tortured to death.

  15. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >scots and irish vehemently kick out the english and get sovereignty
    >go ahead and import millions of muslims and africans

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >ugh I hate these fake Irish plastic paddies that visit from the states
      >Mgubu? He's more Irish than these cringe fat burgers

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        See something similar in coastal American cities where white leftists will b***h and whine about white midwesterners while open-arm embracing nonwhite rapists that can’t even talk, global capitalism has these pathetic creeps down to their spirit.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Because they've been conditioned to think America never had any sort of identity as a "white" country, as if it was never a settler state for mostly British people

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      All you need to do is check who got into positions of power moments prior to the swing towards immigration.

  16. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    That's a big eye.

  17. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I had my way my entire life and you will never live a life where I didn't make you miserable, therefore I won. Aaaaaand I'm out.

  18. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    There’s countless ways of making her lose the baby.
    Imprison her and have a physician stuff some herb up her snatch.

  19. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    LIBERTAAAAAAAD
    K I N O

  20. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
  21. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Since I would be living in a patriarchy and not today's matriarchy, I would punch her belly so hard she would abort the kid instantly.

  22. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    imprison her and then hang her with her infant son's entrails

  23. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
  24. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >How would you respond without shitting your pants?
    That's okay, because your son will grow up to conquer all of France for England. Frick you b***h. Now get over here and suck this dick.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *