I hate this type of colour grading so much. Why do lots of movies still use it for virtually every shot?
I hate this type of colour grading so much. Why do lots of movies still use it for virtually every shot?
I hate this type of colour grading so much. Why do lots of movies still use it for virtually every shot?
T I T S
Did that third terrorizer movie ever release? I remember being told she'd do frontal nudity in it, and that it would release last october/december. But I do not remember seeing any shills advertising the movie on this board at that time.
it's le retro crap
Not all retro is crap.
it's reddit trend from the 2010s frick off
Reddit invented nostalgia in 2010?
Because It fits into the teenage girl theme, Their target audience.
The only good retro grading was The Love Witch. OP pic looks like some shitty IG filter.
It's some shitty movie called Terrifier 2. Looks like it has a budget of about $200k
Looks like you self-owned anon
>Terrifier 2 grossed an eye-popping $15 million on just a $250,000 heavily crowdfunded budget
>Looks like you self-owned anon
How did I self-own
>the movie made a profit, you can't call it shitty
total moron comment
Because you were trying to be incredulous about the cost and instead were right on the nose? I would like to see what film you produce with $200k.
>Because you were trying to be incredulous about the cost and instead were right on the nose?
But anon, my guess was correct because I've seen over 5000 movies. The gore effects look incredibly cheap. I know cheap dogshit when I see it.
"This movie has production values commensurate with the budget."
Got em!
trillions of flies eat shit every day
looks kino
and somehow it's better than anything Disney, Amazon, and Netflix have came out with in years.
it's a good movie
Ah yes, totally genuine comments
The movie is godawful. The one thing it's attempting to do well, it fails at. The gore looks like cake and syrup.
and your opinion is automatically disregarded for being moronic you may leave now please don't come again.
>Made with a similar budget
>Completely mogs both Terrifier films
that's crazy never heard of that movie I wonder why? nobody fricking cares go away this is a terrifier thread
Oh, this is a terrifier thread?
This is an actual scene from the movie. Nice jump cut.
Youtuber tier skills. Total dogshit
it looks good. you got filtered
that's crazy anon, anyways
soi overload
terrifier is peak soi
It's the safest version of a supposedly nasty horror film there is. Compared to the early 00s remakes of Hills have Eyes, Texas Chainsaw or something like Rob Zombie's The Devils Rejects it's frankly pussy shit. Its playing at being a vicious film but without any of the legit nastiness. They're bloody and gory in the same way the last 20 minutes of Peter Jackson's braindead is only Terrifier doesn't have any decent jokes so its not even funny either.
>terrifier is peak soi. It's the safest version of a supposedly nasty horror film there is
OP here. This is largely how I feel about it. It feels like it was made by the same kinda Americans who run those horror house events. Everything is comically over the top, none of the gore looks real. All looks like wet food to me.
Even The Gore Gore Girls from 1972 was more disturbing. That was made with a budget of $63.5k. The effects didn't look real, but they were shocking since they used animal parts.
I presume that people who liked this movie are kids or teenagers. Gotta be.
>Everything is comically over the top
Did you ever consider that it's intended to be comical?
>It's the safest version of a supposedly nasty horror film there is
How is the first one safe? Art saws a woman in half by the pussy, then sticks her breasts on his chest and tucks in his dick to do a troony bit. Later on he chews a woman's face off. This is not exactly cut away hand mutilation.
I was about to say the color grading looks exactly like Terrifier 2. I mean if I can recognize the movie without even remembering the scene, I'd guess their choice in aesthetics was pretty good at making the movie memorable, even if the actual plot wasn't memorable.
Now one of the characters is watching Night of the Living Dead, but the aspect ratio is wrong. Which means nobody on the movie crew could tell. Not surprising.
Yeah uhhh...color grading OP....umm uhh yeah that's why we're all here....uhh no other reason...none at all.
*fap fap fap fap fap*
this movie was pretty cool to see in theatres around Halloween. Its low-budget so i can forgive a lot of aspects of it, but that awkward dream sequence with that annoying earworm song is unforgivable and significantly degrades the quality of the film. the main actress looked exactly like my ex and that was cool i guess. i liked how the movie hinted Art is the dad of the main girl, some throw away line about how their dad was insanely laughing as he died from some electrocution or something. thats what i surmised at least, especially since he was drawing the clown and the murder victims exactly how they were. With Art imagining the lil evil clown girl, I assumed it's because he used to be a father. Maybe im reading too deep into this goreslop, and maybe that's exactly what the director wanted. wont go see 3 unless im at the movies with a girl.