I have never seen?

I have never seen Cinemaphile talk about this movie. Is it silently loved like Emperor's New Groove or is it just flat out forgotten about like Bolt?

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

  1. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    one of the best kids movies of the last decade, it gets spoke about alot just not so much anymore

  2. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Silently loved. In general, if Cinemaphile doesn't talk about something, it's considered too good to hate.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >if Cinemaphile doesn't talk about something, it's considered too good to hate.
      Or it's cause nobody on Cinemaphile watched it.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >if Cinemaphile doesn't talk about something, it's considered too good to hate.
      True in my experience

  3. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    The only reason anyone brings up anything on this board is to shit on it so if it's not brought up it's generally liked enough

  4. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Like the other theatrical LEGO movies it's mostly eye candy (and very good at that), but little else.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >little else
      its full of little jokes and nods for DC fans to spot, the humour is pretty fricking good, if anything the way it looks is the last thing fans are gonna notice

  5. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    all these lego films are the same.
    >"we can not die because we are legos"
    >*quips*
    >"aw my leg, now I am an amputee! wait I am a lego"
    >*quips*
    >4th wall joke
    >*quips*

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >My name's Richard Grayson but all the kids at orphanage call me Dick.
    >Well. Children can be cruel.

  7. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Its widely considered the best Batman film of the last decade. It just happens to also be a lego movie.

  8. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It would be okay but the plot is HORRENDOUS. I never see people talk about this. They throw away Batman's entire rogues gallery and replace them with a bunch of pop culture villains for some reason. It sucks. It's really, really shitty.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Did you watch the entire movie? They portray Joker as a massive butthole for that and the climax has the villains help Batman save Gotham. It's not like they did unironically like Batman: White Knight did.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      That’s one of the things I loved about the movie. It felt like when I was playing with Legos. When I was a kid my main minifig was Harry Potter whi was also Spider-Man, and he thought Darth Vader. I wasn’t expecting crossover in the Lego Batman movie, but it’s so true to the essence of Lego that I’m glad.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I don't care about that gay shit. I just wanted it to be Batman universe only.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Doesn't his entire rogues gallery (including obscure ones which they joke about) appear at the beginning of the film?

  9. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Its aight, not the lego movie good but pretty good

  10. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's pretty good. Not as good as the first movie, but not as terrible as Part 2 or Ninjago.
    It's very meta though, so your enjoyment depends on your enjoyment of Batman as a franchise.
    It also has the best Harley design, fight me.

  11. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I worked at a theater when this released. The only movie releases that sucked more to work were Beauty and the Beast live action and FRICKING Black Panther.

  12. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Unironically the best and only Bat-Family movie we've gotten

  13. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's the fourth best Batman movie.

  14. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Alfred names all the years of past Batman movies with LEGO-fied scenes from each
    >Except for "1998" which is just Bat-nipples

  15. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not as good as the original Lego Movie, but still a surprisingly good film considering.
    It honestly understood Batman better than pretty much all the live action ones, which is the most impressive thing about it. But the third act definitely loses points for going all-in on muh multiverse cameo villains
    >Ralph Fiennes voices Alfred in the movie
    >Voldemort appears as one of the cameo villains
    >Fiennes doesn't voice Voldemort

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      They apparently tried to get Ralph to voice Voldemort but WB barred them.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        That doesn't track. Why would WB block that when they produced both this film and Harry Potter?
        Utterly bizarre

  16. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Where's the Marbles Movie for kids who grew up with that instead?

  17. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >what if Batman and Joker were actual homosexuals for each other
    Just another example of people turning meme shitposting about Batman as canon.
    "Batman is a fascist" and the lasso scene from the Flush are also good example of this trend.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      With Demian being a ninja killer you can rest assured the next Batman movie will something like pic rel at some point.

  18. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >I have never seen Cinemaphile talk about this movie.
    That's because the movie premiered 6 years go and zoomers/millennials only have the attention span of 2-4 weeks max before moving on to the next Flavor of the Month.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *