>I see you’re working at a fast food restaurant, and struggling to pay off your college debt
>you probably can barely afford rent on an apartment and want a home
>’grandma. Oh grandma. Please don’t throw away our family’s most valuable possession. Boo hoo boo’
>let me tell you something you spoiled little brat. When I took off your clothes and was drawn naked, that was the most erotic moment of my life
>my husband might’ve loved me, and worked hard building a family together with me
>but I never loved your grandfather at all
>now I want you to think about your 10 hour shift at Wendy’s as I drop this priceless necklace into the ocean
>I don’t have to do this. I have no reason to do this. You don’t want me to do this. And I’m going to do this anyway
>*lets go*
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
I feel like there's a current of propaganda poisoning the well against women. Granted many are pieces of vapid shit but I mean they're still human right?
yes. men need women and women need men. society cannot exist without men and women. it absolutely can exist (and thrive) without homosexuals and nonwhites.
still, just because this moronic prostitute is rightfully hated does not mean all women should be hated.
as a woman this post gives me huge incel vibes
literally what the frick
ywnbaw
i am, though
you're weird as hell bro, go back to your home board
I'm sorry but cutting your wiener off doesn't make you a woman
Post your breasts right now. Go on, prove us all wrong, you have nothing to lose just post your breasts. I’m sure you’re mobile posting and you don’t have to include your face
i'm not showing you shit you literal incel, go be thirsty somewhere else
ywnbaw
how would you know if you've never been with one? it's all hearsay for you
I can tell by your broad shoulders and deep voice
those are male qualities and yet you don't have them, how come?
>N-NO YOU!
all the estrogen you're injecting definitely makes you think like a woman, I'll give you that
eventually you'll catch up with me from spiking cortisol thinking about gay people and minorities all day, chuddie
cool story homo
You’re not showing me any because you DON’T HAVE ANY. Granted though you’re probably just baiting and not even a troony so fair play
NTA but why does it shock you so much there's women on Cinemaphile when there's a literal female Cinemaphile equivalent?
both incels and femcels are deranged and annoying and yo all need to kys
>NTA
sure
>not knowing the people you're posting with
Next thing you'll tell me there's no non-whites on Cinemaphile too, newbie.
I know that. It's only annoying when these threads digress into blatant shit-flinging between angry men and women over fictional characters. In the case of Rose, the thing isn't meant to be 100% realistic, it's a romance movie and it's more about what her gesture meant than whether or not her extended family survived or got rich.
You could even assume they found that heirloom later on and got rich, but the point is that she chose to discard it as her possession.
That person is definitely baiting, they’re being pretty blatant. I guess they still could be a woman baiting, but I would safely bet like 99:1 it’s a guy. The incel and chud comments is a clear sign of an act. But I guess that’s a fair point and you could take the ending like that. It still leaves a bit of a bad taste I’d say since she was remarried for so long, though. And that’s ignoring the priceless artifact she’s destroying or the lack of concern for her kids. I don’t know if the writers overlooked those details, but if you ignore them, it could still be a guess an okay gesture, even though she should’ve moved on from Jack after he died and he would’ve probably not wanted her to do that
>That person is definitely baiting, they’re being pretty blatant.
Unlikely. Again, there's all kinds of people on Cinemaphile, it's not muh sekret club and hasn't been for a while.
>and he would’ve probably not wanted her to do that
I agree with that. But she was ultimately the last owner of the necklace and its fate was up to her. There's millionaires out there who don't leave jack shit (no pun) for their heirs. Call it assholish behavior but it's true.
In the alt. ending she also stresses that she didn't want to live dependent of Cal's help, which is another reason why she never sold it.
One could argue she gave the necklace back to Cal, although symbolically it was Jack.
In both cases, it's as if Cal had never given her the necklace, and that's the whole point.
If people are acting too moronic to seem genuine, I think they’re usually not genuine. Maybe my expectation in humanity is a little high, or I’ve never encountered any real morons in real life and they’re more common than I think. But I can usually tell when something just smacks of bait. I can imagine someone having fun or after some (yous) doing an act way easier than a genuine person being themselves a lot of the time. And even though it might technically have been Rose, it really should’ve been Cal’s. And even if someone gave it to her, she did nothing to earn it. I think it’s very selfish and butthole for people to not leave anything behind even if they don’t have any technical legal obligation. But if you care about your children and want them to be happy like a normal good person, you should probably not just discard it all. But I get that it might’ve been in line with the theme of the movie and you’re not supposed to look at it realistically or from a completely pragmatic point
I would say it’s 5% female at most on here. Then board is male dominated, and most women aren’t even shitposters or into this style of chat. Not to mention just the fact there’s a lot of misogyny. But when he didn’t post breasts, I knew he was a man. A real woman would’ve posted breasts because they’re after some attention and what not, and had he been a real woman that would’ve gotten lots of (yous)
Born a female?
True. I have seen women absolutely trash Rose on Quora.
Those are the type of women who coincidentally would never look at you if you're not an extremely rich gigachad.
>they're still human right
morons and serial killers are human too.
Women have fricked up the modern era so badly that you can't even tell me what a woman even is without being fired from your job.
True. The nose knows.
>they're still human right?
No
Physiognomy strikes AGAIN, pseudo science my ass
Look at that evil rat looking b***h
fake article idiot
I mean they have different chromosomes.. so no.
Since you love Jack so much, the best place you can be is at the bottom of the ocean with him. Get ready to swim you old b***h, you’re going overboard!
Oh, and by the way, I don’t work at Wendy’s! I’m actually a software engineer and do website design!
>I don’t work at Wendy’s!
>do website design!
Now that I think about it, it’s a difficult conundrum if what I would do. On one hand, if I throw her over board before killing her, she’ll drown and suffer a lot more. But then I won’t get the satisfaction of directly killing her myself. So if I beat her to death and then throw her over board, I get the satisfaction, but now she won’t drown. I honestly don’t know what to do, I might honestly be frozen deciding on which course of action I should take. I suppose maybe I would just snap a couple of her arms first and then strangle her or beat her to death, so she’ll have some pain before she dies, but drowning in the ocean seems pretty bad and it has some poetic justice there too
Throwing her overboard brings the satisfaction of the drowning/freezing process and her confused about why it is going on at all.
Maybe a firm slap that ragdolls her over the railing like in those Las Vegas slap-off matches. Just a firm blast that launches her over the railing.
This is what I would do, assuming there’s not any witnesses around or will be any for awhile. I would walk over and kick her really hard in the knee, probably breaking her fragile old bones there. Then I would levy down a bucket into the ocean, and I’d rip my grandmas clothes off and throw that on her. Now she’s cold and wet. Then I would levy down the bucket again, and this time, I would hold my grandma’s head in the bucket, until she starts running out of oxygen. I would maybe lift her up a few times before letting her get unconscious, and I would only probably break a couple more of her bones throughout doing this. Then maybe after I’ve calmed enough of my agitation, I’d hold her under water for a final time until she loses consciousness, then I would pull her out of the water, and then I would snap her neck, and kill her, so it was like she drowned. And then I could just drop her into the ocean and everyone would think it was a suicide. It’s the perfect crime, even though it shouldn’t be one
Tie her down in a chair. Rip off every one of her toenails and fingernails, rip out every single one of her teeth. Break all the bones in her body. Tie a tourniquet around her arms and thighs, cut off her fingers and toes, then her hands and feet. Make sure to cauterize the wounds while doing so so that she doesn’t bleed to death. Gouge out her eyeballs and cut off her tongue. Cut off her ears and slice out her nipples. Mutilate her vegana. Stab her thighs and arms. Put a stake up her anus and vegana. Severe and dissect some of her nerves, but be sure to leave some intact. Then place a basin cloth over her face and water board her while burning her to death.
Imaging just killing her in a self-defense situation.
I hate boomers so much it's unreal.
it was a lookalike. she was committing insurance fraud
>so that old woman... shes just a liar right?
>and a bit of a tramp if you ask me
It was a historical national artifact as well.
Bill Paxton's friend should've missile dropkicked her over the railing.
>SHE'S GOT IT IN HER FRICKING HANDS excuse me HER HANDS
Why didn't she dream about, you know, her actually family instead of some hobo she banged. This triggers me to know end. Ive written letters to Cameron telling him how flawed this shit is. No responses but im sure he realized how much he fricked up.
You wouldn't get it because you're literally autistic. I wouldn't be surprised if you did write letters you embarrassing moron.
The funny thing is a woman would never do something like this. This is what a guy thinks a girl would do. She'd hold onto that shit.
Rose was a malignant narcissist, though. Most women wouldn’t do that, but Rose would, and a decent amount of women too. To her, she’s going to be dead very soon anyway, and she probably doesn’t want her kids or grandkids to have the necklace. She most likely thinks they deserve to suffer, or is just completely indifferent towards them, but whatever the reason is, she’s going to toss it into the ocean. No historical museums or wealth for grandkids matter to her at all. Rose does what she wants, when she wants, and has never spent a second thought on anyone other than herself. And maybe it’s because she grew up so entitled and pampered by everyone for so long, but it’s made her a monster
I hate Titanic so much it's unreal
It is a decidedly western take on women.
In no other society would woman even think about doing that, even if she really did remember some guy from a hundred years fondly.
Only in a western society do women have these self-destructive impulses to the point where they act on them publicly instead of keeping it in. In fact she does not only do it, but makes a public show of it so OTHERS knew she did it and what her state of mind is.
If noone was around she'd pocket it and walk away to do it at some point when there's an audience.
No one was around. She went out to the deck alone.
James Cameron was there, just offscreen, filming.
>If noone was around she'd pocket it and walk away to do it at some point when there's an audience.
She was alone when she threw it. The other ending is non-canon.
It's written by a male simp (Cameron)
But that would imply western women aren't soulless gold-digging prostitutes.
I have it on good authority Tom Selleck was in the ocean that day.
Wasn't there an alternative ending where it turns out she lied about the whole thing, and Bill Paxton's character ends up punching her before she can drop it in the water?
No, but there is a cut scene where the bearded fatso jokes and laughs about Rose wanting to kill herself on the Titanic as she just needed to wait 2 days to die
Rose stayed at home while her husband worked full time and had a second job so that they could pay for a nanny to raise the kids while she went out shopping, eating, having “experiences” and “finding herself”. Then when the kids got older they took out hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt to go to college. Her kids could barely afford having children but they just barely got by by cutting out all luxuries and only paying for the bare necessities. Then her grandchildren took out hundreds of thousands of more dollars of debt for college, but things had gotten so expensive they couldn’t even afford a house, let alone kids. They were stuck living in a studio in the city barely making ends meet by eating ramen and beans every night. Then rose through this priceless diamond overboard that could have provided for her great grandchildren’s great grandchildren, took out a reverse mortgage on her home, and spend the next 20 years in a nursing home paid for by her family. What a horrible person.
Yep, the final message of the movie was a bit of twist that most people missed. Her husband was supposed to be basically the epitome of greed, selfishness, and evil. Only to show that Rose was a mirror image of him. The only good character was Jack. He was selfless, and died for Rose. Rose hogged the whole raft, even though there was room for two. James Cameron doesn’t get enough credit for this film. It’s seen as a sloppy romance, but he added a lot of levels of complexity and symbolism to the film. The inhumane side of Rose was only seen at the end when she let Jack die, and then showed a shocking amount of indifference for her late husband and children. Children she should love way more than Jack, but she decided the skeleton of Jack should have the necklace instead of any of them
She stole her exes diamond necklace, then laughed when she heard he went broke and killed himself simply because… he was kind and pampered her.
>he was kind and pampered her
sauce?
She didn't steal shit. It was put in Jack's coat as a way to frame him, and she found it by accident.
Cal is the one who screwed himself over with the necklace. Losing it was purely and simply karma.
It's as moronic as those youtubers who give hobos money and then ask for it when the video is done filming. It's like, no b***h, the money is mine now.
Legitimately a vile c**t
One of the truly evil villains in movies
Boomers really are like that. They sell their homes to rent a villa then waste it all on cruises and gambling.
The object was clearly cursed and had lead to at least two traumatic events for those in possession of it. She was smart for getting rid of it.
Superstitious old bag.
PLEASE
STOP
CRITICIZING
FICTIONAL
WOMEN