The casters of roid monkeys fail to understand that Batman is supposed to have a secret identity and absolutely anyone would figure it out just by seeing how huge and swole he is.
Should be someone who looks ripped but can also realistically conceal his physique.
>oh wow there is this vigilante with an arsenal of the very best military grade equipment in the world to rival even what is hidden from the public by the US military >for some reason he only has an interest in policing one city >hmm who could it be? definitely not the weird billionaire whose father was interested in developing Gotham city before he was murdered by criminals, he doesn't look swole enough
The whole thing is silly for frick's sake. The guy looks the part and looks cool. let's leave it at that.
>current trendy actor would be good for X role
This is why Hollywood has never taken fan casting seriously. And the lack of self awareness you midwits have is astounding. You morons can't see anything past a superficial level, you just see white man with big steroid muscles and you think "HES LE HECKIN PERFECT FOR BATMANERINO". No fan would've ever picked Affleck or Pattinson as Batman and they both had the greatest live action Batman performances by miles. Quit with the obvious, trendy, reddit approved fan casting trash, you're just exposing yourself as a talentless cretin
I disliked Pattinson intensely, I loved Affleck. Best portrayal of the character by MILES. Ritchson exhibits a lot of the characteristics of Batman in his Reacher role. He's the right age to balance it out with a young Superman and is growing more popular every year. Makes sense. Who else could it be? Name an actor right now.
>I loved Affleck. Best portrayal of the character by MILES
Based Batfleck enjoyer
He really has been the best casting so far.
>Keaton, who the frick cast this comedy actor as the dark fricking knight? His silly israelite curls look ridiculous as Bruce Wayne >Kilmer, who the frick cast this slim pretty boy with big gay lips? >Clooney, absolutely ridiculous, not even worth commenting >Bale, a brilliant actor but a boring Bruce Wayne and wtf is the Batman voice about (Cillian Murphy, one of Nolan's candidates for Bruce would have been way more interesting) >Batfleck, perfect jawline, perfect body, best suits, best voice, good as both Bruce and Batman >Battinson, get the frick out of here twink boy, possibly even gayer than Kilmer
>for some reason he only has an interest in policing one city
Imagine believing this was true. Holy shit. I can't even imagine. You are such a normie. Good God, I'm so sorry that you don't know the lore.
>Last time I checked capeshit is breaking all box office records
Was this last time you checked 2018? Capeshit has been on a downward spiral since covid.
No Way Home made 2 billion dollars, that came out in '21.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Doesn't count. People came out for Tugboat. It was a reminder of a simpler time.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Of course it counts. And so does Guardians of the Galaxy 3, which made just under 900mil and came out this year.
People will still come out for superhero movies without any major raceswaps if they don't think they're being openly attacked or insulted for being white or male.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>And so does Guardians of the Galaxy 3
lmao, no one saw that
you can literally just look at the guy in the suit and while you can tell he's big, nothing says how cut he is. Bruce is a strapping, fit guy in a suit in most depictions.
He's good for the role, no matter how big he is. He can slim down. I think no matter how popular Reacher is, he wouldn't be dumb enough to pass on Batman. Even with capeshit dying, Batman is untouchable. Who else can do it? Any suggestions?
>I think no matter how popular Reacher is, he wouldn't be dumb enough to pass on Batman.
Would you rather your fanbase for the rest of your life at conventions be vets and militia bros who like LARPing as agents or basedboy comic book fans?
Both seem lame to me but comic book fans are worse I guess but what does he care? He gets to be Batman on cinema screens which is not something more than a handful of actors can boast about.
If only this homie could act properly...he would be the perfect homelander...you know it's true bros. Get him as marcus fenix in a gears movie too, frick batista, that guys a homosexual.
Batman is best when he sticks to the shadows and most of the denizens of Gotham regard him as a myth. In that case, it doesn't matter what he looks like, because anyone who does spot him either never gets a good look at him or they're assumed to be exaggerating when they describe him.
I always remember bruce wayne being giga-huge in suits. But typically other characters were also just ripped for no reason so it didn't stand out that much. I agree his reacher look alongside just normal people would look ridiculous
>seeing how huge and swole he is.
This is irrelevant. The better reason you don't cast hyper roided out dudes is that they look weird in the costume. It makes him look fat.
One of the open secrets in the comic book industry is that they draw the characters as if they're nude, not as if they're wearing a costume. But if you were to put a big bulky rubber costume over prime Arnold, he'd look stupid. You have to get someone that is pretty fit, but still has room to put a complicated costume over it. Actually putting them in spandex isn't an option, it always looks dumb.
It's funny, I went back to check because I thought "I bet he didn't put them on Batgirl" but, he did. They're not as prominent, but they're there. And I remember thinking "Alicia Silverstone was kind if a disappointing Batgirl" but looking right at it, it looks so wonderfully sexualized compared to the slop we've been fed for years now.
His Poison Ivy was still shit though. They made her look like a drag queen.
86 a great Batman casting because of some anons autism about people being able to recognize him in a fictional universe because he’s too swole? No, I don’t think that makes any sense.
Possibly. Them starting the universe with a subversive character lineup like the Authority only spells doom. WBD's future is fricked anyway, I doubt it'll even get made and be canceled.
Gunn is too wienery from having thrust GotG into the spotlight. As well as several relatively unknown character in the Suicide Squad. Ffs Peacemaker got his own show and got thrown into a Mortal Kombat game, nobody knew who he was til Gunn got a hold of him. Maybe, he can have the same effect with The Authority.
>current trendy actor would be good for X role
This is why Hollywood has never taken fan casting seriously. And the lack of self awareness you midwits have is astounding. You morons can't see anything past a superficial level, you just see white man with big steroid muscles and you think "HES LE HECKIN PERFECT FOR BATMANERINO". No fan would've ever picked Affleck or Pattinson as Batman and they both had the greatest live action Batman performances by miles. Quit with the obvious, trendy, reddit approved fan casting trash, you're just exposing yourself as a talentless cretin
Even Blood Meridian fans who see themselves as super kino enjoyers cannot see past the Judge being a huge, very pale, bald man and all their fancasts are actors who are tall, pale, and bald but have no acting talent.
Because that's how he's fricking described in the book. Make a compelling argument for why he should look completely different from his book description that isn't "IT DOESN'T MATTER TO ME!!!" as that isn't compelling at all.
BECAUSE HE IS DESCRIBED AS SUCH. Just get this guy, he fits all the criteria and has le acting talent too boost.
Not compelling arguments.
Also, see
Nobody pictured Anton Chigurh as a dorky Spaniard with a terrible haircut and look where we are now
5 months ago
Anonymous
Doesn't matter, his appearance is more than half the reason he is so memorable.
5 months ago
Anonymous
You have no argument. You're just saying "you have no compelling argument" but that's completely worthless because it's compelling to anyone who isn't a moron. Matching the source material is important to people with functioning brains who aren't narcissistic sociopaths. Hence, you saying "That isn't compelling" is you stating you have no argument, you know you're wrong, and you're mentally ill.
Which we already knew.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>You have no argument.
Anton Chigurh on screen is my argument.
What is yours that the Judge MUST be pale, tall, and bald?
So you concede you have no compelling argument? Good. Glad you realized you're wrong homosexual.
See above.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Anton Chigurh on screen is my argument.
Chigurh had no description in the book you lying moron. He literally was a blank slate. Judge isn't. Your own example fricked you in the ass you illiterate homosexual.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Nobody in the world pictured Anton as a Spaniard with a terrible haircut.
If you'd been told it would be Javier Bardem before the film came out you'd lol and call it gay as shit.
Turns out he's the best villain in recent cinema history.
So eat shit, pseud who can't see what is important about the Judge other than his physical appearance. Your IQ is as shallow as a puddle, which is ironic because you could probably drown in one if you fell over.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Nobody in the world pictured Anton as a Spaniard with a terrible haircut.
THERE'S NO DESCRIPTION IN THE BOOK homosexual LOL. You're told on this.
Judge has a description, Chigurh didn't. There was no preconception about what Chugurh looked like because it was intentionally left vague. He could have looked like anyone. He could have been a deranged pakistani, a chainsmoking chinaman, a crazed cambodian.
Judge meanwhile has a description set in stone. Whoever it is you're shilling for your fancast, they're shit and so the frick are you.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>BECAUSE THE BOOK SAYS SO
Repeating the same thing over and over isn't an argument. Why is it important that he is tall, pale, and bald? Still no compelling reasons. None at all.
>Why?
Because that's what people want. People don't want things changed from their description, that's the entire point of adaptation you belligerent homosexual.
Now point blank, answer me WHY NOT? Why the FRICK does it need to be changed? Give an actual fricking reason. But you don't have one. You just want it to be different because you're a disgusting narcissist with your own stupid, worthless fricking idea of what it should be. You got an answer and you will in return respond with nothing because you know you have nothing.
>WHY NOT?
If you can find a good actor who fits the description, great. What I'm saying is that all the fancasts I see are putting heavy emphasis on big bald guys even if those guys are D list actors with no acting chops.
5 months ago
Anonymous
We're not casting directors moron with extensive unknown actors to choose from. FRICK OFF.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>FRICK OFF
My my, you're really angry, aren't you darling?
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Why is it important that he is tall, pale, and bald?
Why is it important that Black Panther be black and from Africa?
Why is important that Zoro wear a mask or fight with a sword?
You already conceded homosexual. You were asked to provide a reason why not and your only response was
>JUST BECAUSE EVERYONE TELLS ME I'M WRONG AND THE BOOK SAYS I'M WRONG AND REALITY SAYS I'M WRONG DOESN'T MEAN I'M WRONG AND I DON'T HAVE TO HAVE A REASON YOU BIG MEANIE!!!!! *cries and shits pants violently*
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Why is it important that Black Panther be black and from Africa?
Because it's capeshit about African nationalism marketed at basketball Americans
>Why is important that Zoro wear a mask or fight with a sword?
To conceal his identity like a superhero and a sword happens to be his weapon of choice
So why does the Judge need to be SPECIFICALLY bald, tall, and pale?
Last time I'm asking this question, I'm tired of nobody giving me an answer.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>So why does the Judge need to be SPECIFICALLY bald, tall, and pale?
Because he's SPECIFICALLY described SPECIFICALLY in the SPECIFIC book as bald, tall and pale. What reason is there to change him from how he's described? Frick it, I'm sick of your autism. Here's what it says in the fricking book word for word moron:
>a massive, hairless, albino man who excels in shooting, languages, horsemanship, dancing, music, drawing, diplomacy, science and anything else he seems to put his mind to.
You're not providing any reason it should be changed from how it's described. You conceded that that alone "That's how it is in the book." is a good enough reason for Black Panther and Zorro. You're not providing any reason it somehow stops being a valid reason here other than "I don't like big scary bold white men! They make me cry and I think they wanna put stuff in my butthole and poo on my face!" You have yet to provide a single reason why it should be changed from how it's specifically described in the fricking book. Your personal terror of being made a b***h by large white men is irrelevant and not a reason.
It is his persistent, well-known and popular description and how everyone fricking pictures him. Your question is like "Why does the Joker have to smile or have green hair?" "How come Superman has to be super strong?" "Why can't Batman have super powers?" You're going to have to provide an actual reason why this should be changed.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>because book says so
And what significance does him being bald, tall, and pale have to the story? Any at all?
5 months ago
Anonymous
You accepted "The book says so" as a valid reasoning for Black Panther and Zoro, why does it stop mattering now? And why are you boiling it down to that and excluding "That's how everyone knows of, perceives, imagines and portrays the character?" You're not providing any justification to change it.
This is your last one. If you reply with a question and don't have a solid, actual reason to change it, you fricking concede. End of discussion. If there is a single fricking question mark in your next reply you concede. Enough of this begging the question bullshit. You asked "Why?" and were given multiple reasons you simply don't like. You were asked "Why not?" and you just repeated your fricking question and dodged.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>You accepted "The book says so" as a valid reasoning for Black Panther and Zoro, why does it stop mattering now?
No I didn't, I gave actual reasons other than that. Shoving those aside and pretending I didn't doesn't make what you say right, it makes you dishonest.
>And why are you boiling it down to that and excluding "That's how everyone knows of, perceives, imagines and portrays the character?" You're not providing any justification to change it.
I never said I desired to change it, I said it isn't as important as everyone makes it out to be. Having a great performance from an average height man would be better than a so so performance from a big guy.
>This is your last one
ooOooOooo shiver me timbers! I's so afraid!
>End of discussion.
Let's end it here before you have an aneurysm. I think you need to take an aspirin and lie down, sweetie.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>No I didn't, I gave actual reasons other than that.
No you fricking didn't. You just named how they're described IN. THE. BOOKS.
>Because it's capeshit about African nationalism marketed at basketball Americans
In the books, but it could be about white nationalism marketed at white Europeans. You're just listing how it is in the books, why couldn't it be changed if "that's how it is in the books" isn't a valid reason? See fricktard? You didn't provide a single fricking reason.
>To conceal his identity like a superhero and a sword happens to be his weapon of choice
Wouldn't a full face mask more effectively conceal his identity? Why couldn't he have another weapon of choice like a spear or an axe? Oh, oh, because that's how it is "in the book"? You don't have any actual fricking reason you autistic weirdo lmfao.
Your entire argument boils down to "I don't like it, so it doesn't matter if that's what it says in the book -BUT I DO LIKE IT OTHER TIMES SO THEN IT MATTERS!"
5 months ago
Anonymous
I accept your concession.
5 months ago
Anonymous
You're not even trying anymore, your concession is accepted. Stay mad and stay told.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>I never said I desired to change it,
YOUR CONCESSION IS ACCEPTED. Thanks for admitting you're wrong, homosexual.
>Having a great performance from an average height man
Out with it dicklicker, who the frick is it you're trying to push? Who's balls are being warmed by your tongue as we speak? Which micromanlet is it you want to deep dick? It's obvious you have someone in mind, homosexual.
You *asserting* "It's not important" isn't an argument, it's you stating your worthless personal opinion.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Your concession status: accepted
5 months ago
Anonymous
Das rite, you did concede b***h.
5 months ago
Anonymous
No you, Mr. Potty mouth, are in fact the one who has concede. I, Mr. Handsome, accept your concession.
5 months ago
Anonymous
But it is actually I who is Mr. Handsome, and you are dubbed Ugly Doodie-Face.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Nah
5 months ago
Anonymous
>who the frick is it you're trying to push?
I think I would be a pretty good Judge
5 months ago
Anonymous
Then post a picture. Timestamped of course. But douse yourself in baby powder first so you sort of look the part.
5 months ago
Anonymous
it would be extremely cringe to actually have him be full white in a film
5 months ago
Anonymous
It would be extremely cringe to change it because some autistic moron online hates white people. He's supposed to be a supernatural figure. He's as close to being one as a person can be without it being something genuinely fantastical. He claims to be immortal. Albinos exist, big frickers exist, hairless people exist. It's entirely possible for someone to look like him, in fact he's inspired by a specific, actual person. The combination of qualities gives him a creepy appearance.
"I don't like it" isn't a fricking argument.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>It would be extremely cringe to change it because some autistic moron online hates white people.
Quote the posts where I said anything that even remotely hints at that sweetie.
>He's supposed to be a supernatural figure.
And you prioritise a halloween costume over an actor who could give a great performance because you need everything spelled out for you like a comic book.
>"I don't like it" isn't a fricking argument.
Never once did I say I wouldn't like it if the Judge is tall, bald, and pale. I said it isn't as important as you make it out to be.
He definitely has to be a white man though because of all the racism in the novel.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>change it because some autistic moron
I think forcing it to work when it just doesn't look good on camera just because it's that way in the book is way more autistic
5 months ago
Anonymous
>It just doesn't work.
Wrong yet again.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>clown makeup works for the... clown character
wow you're a genius
5 months ago
Anonymous
>You're not providing any reason it should be changed from how it's described.
Finding a great actor who could play the role extremely well but who is average height, just white skinned, and has hair would be preferable to a big white guy who isn't that much of an actor just because he fits the description in the book.
The Judge is more than the sum of those 3 qualities, and a great performance is far more important than his superficial physical characteristics.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Why?
Because that's what people want. People don't want things changed from their description, that's the entire point of adaptation you belligerent homosexual.
Now point blank, answer me WHY NOT? Why the FRICK does it need to be changed? Give an actual fricking reason. But you don't have one. You just want it to be different because you're a disgusting narcissist with your own stupid, worthless fricking idea of what it should be. You got an answer and you will in return respond with nothing because you know you have nothing.
Seething autists can't contain themselves when asked a simple question; provide no arguments.
5 months ago
Anonymous
I know, he was asked "Why not" and couldn't come up with a single response! What a fricking spergy moron lmfao.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Obvious Samegay is Samegay
5 months ago
Anonymous
>My entire argument is a book I clearly didn't read and know frickall about.
Another L for you. Judge should look like he's described in the book confirmed. Eat a dick, we both know you want to.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Judge should look like he's described in the book confirmed
Why?
Do you people understand one of the most basic and common single word questions in the English language?
Why?
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Why?
Because that's what people want. People don't want things changed from their description, that's the entire point of adaptation you belligerent homosexual.
Now point blank, answer me WHY NOT? Why the FRICK does it need to be changed? Give an actual fricking reason. But you don't have one. You just want it to be different because you're a disgusting narcissist with your own stupid, worthless fricking idea of what it should be. You got an answer and you will in return respond with nothing because you know you have nothing.
5 months ago
Anonymous
You're delusional and confused and started a meaningless argument, fighting for a moot point.
BECAUSE HE IS DESCRIBED AS SUCH. Just get this guy, he fits all the criteria and has le acting talent too boost.
He is described that way in real life and the book.
Doesn't matter, his appearance is more than half the reason he is so memorable.
When AI can make movies for us actors will be out of a job because of autists like this who just want an exact copy of a story projected into a media that lessens the quality of the story
BUT AT LEAST IT MATCHES THE DESCRIPTION IN LE BOOK
5 months ago
Anonymous
Good. They get paid obscene amounts of money to play pretend.
5 months ago
Anonymous
So you concede you have no compelling argument? Good. Glad you realized you're wrong homosexual.
>I've yet to see a compelling argument as to why the Judge must be tall, pale, or bald.
He needs to look otherwordly and strange, kinda the whole point of his character mate.
I like Ritchson for the simple fact that he makes lefties seethe. On that fancast subreddit it infuriates the people there that he gets suggested basically for every superhero, because they had it pretty locked down that every character only gets recommended raceswaps. Someone says "Who should play Kang now?" it's just every black guy ever even if they make no sense even in the context of Majors, but someone always suggests Ritchson and the sheer assrage they spew about it is hilarious. They've tried to turn it into a meme just to make it stop because it's all twitter lefties.
I got two of them so angry the other day they deleted all of their comments.
>Alan Ritchson as Batman >Ursula Corbero as Catwoman >Bill Skarsgaard as Joker >Sophia Lillis as Batgirl >Shea Wigham as Gordon >David Thewlis as Alfred
2 billies and Pattinson's gay Batman is forgotten.
Because the Black person's in everything.
The dude died twice in the Arkhamverse and they're still bringing him back in the upcoming trainwreck.
Same with Harley, fricking enough of her.
I don't know who either of those people are, but the kid would be a really good Damian Wayne. Although I would have used this era as the reference picture, not the one they went with. Assuming the one in OP's picture is even Damian, I really have no idea what how they draw him in current year.
Michael Keaton has always been terrible casting. He was a comedy actor and he had no place playing Batman. What was Burton thinking, seriously? Of all the talent in the late 80s and the kino Batman comics of the time...he chooses Keaton to be the dark knight.
The casters of roid monkeys fail to understand that Batman is supposed to have a secret identity and absolutely anyone would figure it out just by seeing how huge and swole he is.
Should be someone who looks ripped but can also realistically conceal his physique.
But in the DCAU he was swole as frick. It's fiction, anon. The guy has the personality and demeanour done perfectly so I say go for it.
>oh wow there is this vigilante with an arsenal of the very best military grade equipment in the world to rival even what is hidden from the public by the US military
>for some reason he only has an interest in policing one city
>hmm who could it be? definitely not the weird billionaire whose father was interested in developing Gotham city before he was murdered by criminals, he doesn't look swole enough
The whole thing is silly for frick's sake. The guy looks the part and looks cool. let's leave it at that.
I disliked Pattinson intensely, I loved Affleck. Best portrayal of the character by MILES. Ritchson exhibits a lot of the characteristics of Batman in his Reacher role. He's the right age to balance it out with a young Superman and is growing more popular every year. Makes sense. Who else could it be? Name an actor right now.
>I loved Affleck. Best portrayal of the character by MILES
Based Batfleck enjoyer
He really has been the best casting so far.
>Keaton, who the frick cast this comedy actor as the dark fricking knight? His silly israelite curls look ridiculous as Bruce Wayne
>Kilmer, who the frick cast this slim pretty boy with big gay lips?
>Clooney, absolutely ridiculous, not even worth commenting
>Bale, a brilliant actor but a boring Bruce Wayne and wtf is the Batman voice about (Cillian Murphy, one of Nolan's candidates for Bruce would have been way more interesting)
>Batfleck, perfect jawline, perfect body, best suits, best voice, good as both Bruce and Batman
>Battinson, get the frick out of here twink boy, possibly even gayer than Kilmer
>It won’t be cinematic
>for some reason he only has an interest in policing one city
Imagine believing this was true. Holy shit. I can't even imagine. You are such a normie. Good God, I'm so sorry that you don't know the lore.
Last time I checked capeshit is breaking all box office records, which would make it a pretty casual normie genre.
Checkmate, incel.
>Last time I checked capeshit is breaking all box office records
Was this last time you checked 2018? Capeshit has been on a downward spiral since covid.
And yet it's still #1 by a lot
No Way Home made 2 billion dollars, that came out in '21.
Doesn't count. People came out for Tugboat. It was a reminder of a simpler time.
Of course it counts. And so does Guardians of the Galaxy 3, which made just under 900mil and came out this year.
People will still come out for superhero movies without any major raceswaps if they don't think they're being openly attacked or insulted for being white or male.
>And so does Guardians of the Galaxy 3
lmao, no one saw that
It made like four times it's budget.
Yeah, he should literally look DYEL in clothes, the thing Cinemaphile fears more than anything else.
you can literally just look at the guy in the suit and while you can tell he's big, nothing says how cut he is. Bruce is a strapping, fit guy in a suit in most depictions.
He's good for the role, no matter how big he is. He can slim down. I think no matter how popular Reacher is, he wouldn't be dumb enough to pass on Batman. Even with capeshit dying, Batman is untouchable. Who else can do it? Any suggestions?
>I think no matter how popular Reacher is, he wouldn't be dumb enough to pass on Batman.
Would you rather your fanbase for the rest of your life at conventions be vets and militia bros who like LARPing as agents or basedboy comic book fans?
Both seem lame to me but comic book fans are worse I guess but what does he care? He gets to be Batman on cinema screens which is not something more than a handful of actors can boast about.
If only this homie could act properly...he would be the perfect homelander...you know it's true bros. Get him as marcus fenix in a gears movie too, frick batista, that guys a homosexual.
Shoulda been Ozymandias
I think his acting is fine, hollyhwood israelites hate aryan looking men so he was regulated to playing jock characters. n04ak0
Chris Redfield right here, get christian bale as Wesker.
He's not even that big. He's 6'2" (same as Affleck) and jacked but they use camera tricks to make look gigantic in Reacher.
this
>black dyke is kind of hot with normal black women hair and a dress when in the show she dresses like an insane they/them
Reacher is pozzed for this alone.
I thought she looked decent in this scene with her hair down and not in that skullet she has.
he should have been shazam, he looks the part more than levi and is better with comedy too
hes so ugly
get your eyes checked
Batman is best when he sticks to the shadows and most of the denizens of Gotham regard him as a myth. In that case, it doesn't matter what he looks like, because anyone who does spot him either never gets a good look at him or they're assumed to be exaggerating when they describe him.
I always remember bruce wayne being giga-huge in suits. But typically other characters were also just ripped for no reason so it didn't stand out that much. I agree his reacher look alongside just normal people would look ridiculous
>seeing how huge and swole he is.
This is irrelevant. The better reason you don't cast hyper roided out dudes is that they look weird in the costume. It makes him look fat.
One of the open secrets in the comic book industry is that they draw the characters as if they're nude, not as if they're wearing a costume. But if you were to put a big bulky rubber costume over prime Arnold, he'd look stupid. You have to get someone that is pretty fit, but still has room to put a complicated costume over it. Actually putting them in spandex isn't an option, it always looks dumb.
>But if you were to put a big bulky rubber costume over prime Arnold, he'd look stupid.
Blatantly false, you need to chill.
That's not a batman costume. He looks fine in a Mr. Freeze costume
You didn't think I came with only one example, did you?
That's clearly ice metal duh
kek, I never noticed the Freeze costume also has nipples. Shumacher, you big gay rascal
It's funny, I went back to check because I thought "I bet he didn't put them on Batgirl" but, he did. They're not as prominent, but they're there. And I remember thinking "Alicia Silverstone was kind if a disappointing Batgirl" but looking right at it, it looks so wonderfully sexualized compared to the slop we've been fed for years now.
His Poison Ivy was still shit though. They made her look like a drag queen.
>They're not as prominent, but they're there
they're really hard to miss during her suit up scene https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYxLy74CP7M
moron detected
86 a great Batman casting because of some anons autism about people being able to recognize him in a fictional universe because he’s too swole? No, I don’t think that makes any sense.
>James Gunn's DCU.
His casting choices for Legacy are superb to be fair, all white for white characters and accurate.
I can't wait for James Gunn's new Superman to fail at the box office.
Possibly. Them starting the universe with a subversive character lineup like the Authority only spells doom. WBD's future is fricked anyway, I doubt it'll even get made and be canceled.
Gunn is too wienery from having thrust GotG into the spotlight. As well as several relatively unknown character in the Suicide Squad. Ffs Peacemaker got his own show and got thrown into a Mortal Kombat game, nobody knew who he was til Gunn got a hold of him. Maybe, he can have the same effect with The Authority.
John Cena effect, nothing to do with Peacemaker as a character
hello sir!
>current trendy actor would be good for X role
This is why Hollywood has never taken fan casting seriously. And the lack of self awareness you midwits have is astounding. You morons can't see anything past a superficial level, you just see white man with big steroid muscles and you think "HES LE HECKIN PERFECT FOR BATMANERINO". No fan would've ever picked Affleck or Pattinson as Batman and they both had the greatest live action Batman performances by miles. Quit with the obvious, trendy, reddit approved fan casting trash, you're just exposing yourself as a talentless cretin
Even Blood Meridian fans who see themselves as super kino enjoyers cannot see past the Judge being a huge, very pale, bald man and all their fancasts are actors who are tall, pale, and bald but have no acting talent.
>character looks this certain way
>suggest actors who look like that
>LE HECKIN ACTING ABILITY
anyhow, the guy who played the hillbilly final boss in True Detective should play the Judge.
I've yet to see a compelling argument as to why the Judge must be tall, pale, or bald.
Because that's how he's fricking described in the book. Make a compelling argument for why he should look completely different from his book description that isn't "IT DOESN'T MATTER TO ME!!!" as that isn't compelling at all.
Nobody pictured Anton Chigurh as a dorky Spaniard with a terrible haircut and look where we are now
Not compelling arguments.
Also, see
Doesn't matter, his appearance is more than half the reason he is so memorable.
You have no argument. You're just saying "you have no compelling argument" but that's completely worthless because it's compelling to anyone who isn't a moron. Matching the source material is important to people with functioning brains who aren't narcissistic sociopaths. Hence, you saying "That isn't compelling" is you stating you have no argument, you know you're wrong, and you're mentally ill.
Which we already knew.
>You have no argument.
Anton Chigurh on screen is my argument.
What is yours that the Judge MUST be pale, tall, and bald?
See above.
>Anton Chigurh on screen is my argument.
Chigurh had no description in the book you lying moron. He literally was a blank slate. Judge isn't. Your own example fricked you in the ass you illiterate homosexual.
Nobody in the world pictured Anton as a Spaniard with a terrible haircut.
If you'd been told it would be Javier Bardem before the film came out you'd lol and call it gay as shit.
Turns out he's the best villain in recent cinema history.
So eat shit, pseud who can't see what is important about the Judge other than his physical appearance. Your IQ is as shallow as a puddle, which is ironic because you could probably drown in one if you fell over.
>Nobody in the world pictured Anton as a Spaniard with a terrible haircut.
THERE'S NO DESCRIPTION IN THE BOOK homosexual LOL. You're told on this.
Judge has a description, Chigurh didn't. There was no preconception about what Chugurh looked like because it was intentionally left vague. He could have looked like anyone. He could have been a deranged pakistani, a chainsmoking chinaman, a crazed cambodian.
Judge meanwhile has a description set in stone. Whoever it is you're shilling for your fancast, they're shit and so the frick are you.
>BECAUSE THE BOOK SAYS SO
Repeating the same thing over and over isn't an argument. Why is it important that he is tall, pale, and bald? Still no compelling reasons. None at all.
>WHY NOT?
If you can find a good actor who fits the description, great. What I'm saying is that all the fancasts I see are putting heavy emphasis on big bald guys even if those guys are D list actors with no acting chops.
We're not casting directors moron with extensive unknown actors to choose from. FRICK OFF.
>FRICK OFF
My my, you're really angry, aren't you darling?
>Why is it important that he is tall, pale, and bald?
Why is it important that Black Panther be black and from Africa?
Why is important that Zoro wear a mask or fight with a sword?
You already conceded homosexual. You were asked to provide a reason why not and your only response was
>JUST BECAUSE EVERYONE TELLS ME I'M WRONG AND THE BOOK SAYS I'M WRONG AND REALITY SAYS I'M WRONG DOESN'T MEAN I'M WRONG AND I DON'T HAVE TO HAVE A REASON YOU BIG MEANIE!!!!! *cries and shits pants violently*
>Why is it important that Black Panther be black and from Africa?
Because it's capeshit about African nationalism marketed at basketball Americans
>Why is important that Zoro wear a mask or fight with a sword?
To conceal his identity like a superhero and a sword happens to be his weapon of choice
So why does the Judge need to be SPECIFICALLY bald, tall, and pale?
Last time I'm asking this question, I'm tired of nobody giving me an answer.
>So why does the Judge need to be SPECIFICALLY bald, tall, and pale?
Because he's SPECIFICALLY described SPECIFICALLY in the SPECIFIC book as bald, tall and pale. What reason is there to change him from how he's described? Frick it, I'm sick of your autism. Here's what it says in the fricking book word for word moron:
>a massive, hairless, albino man who excels in shooting, languages, horsemanship, dancing, music, drawing, diplomacy, science and anything else he seems to put his mind to.
You're not providing any reason it should be changed from how it's described. You conceded that that alone "That's how it is in the book." is a good enough reason for Black Panther and Zorro. You're not providing any reason it somehow stops being a valid reason here other than "I don't like big scary bold white men! They make me cry and I think they wanna put stuff in my butthole and poo on my face!" You have yet to provide a single reason why it should be changed from how it's specifically described in the fricking book. Your personal terror of being made a b***h by large white men is irrelevant and not a reason.
It is his persistent, well-known and popular description and how everyone fricking pictures him. Your question is like "Why does the Joker have to smile or have green hair?" "How come Superman has to be super strong?" "Why can't Batman have super powers?" You're going to have to provide an actual reason why this should be changed.
>because book says so
And what significance does him being bald, tall, and pale have to the story? Any at all?
You accepted "The book says so" as a valid reasoning for Black Panther and Zoro, why does it stop mattering now? And why are you boiling it down to that and excluding "That's how everyone knows of, perceives, imagines and portrays the character?" You're not providing any justification to change it.
This is your last one. If you reply with a question and don't have a solid, actual reason to change it, you fricking concede. End of discussion. If there is a single fricking question mark in your next reply you concede. Enough of this begging the question bullshit. You asked "Why?" and were given multiple reasons you simply don't like. You were asked "Why not?" and you just repeated your fricking question and dodged.
>You accepted "The book says so" as a valid reasoning for Black Panther and Zoro, why does it stop mattering now?
No I didn't, I gave actual reasons other than that. Shoving those aside and pretending I didn't doesn't make what you say right, it makes you dishonest.
>And why are you boiling it down to that and excluding "That's how everyone knows of, perceives, imagines and portrays the character?" You're not providing any justification to change it.
I never said I desired to change it, I said it isn't as important as everyone makes it out to be. Having a great performance from an average height man would be better than a so so performance from a big guy.
>This is your last one
ooOooOooo shiver me timbers! I's so afraid!
>End of discussion.
Let's end it here before you have an aneurysm. I think you need to take an aspirin and lie down, sweetie.
>No I didn't, I gave actual reasons other than that.
No you fricking didn't. You just named how they're described IN. THE. BOOKS.
>Because it's capeshit about African nationalism marketed at basketball Americans
In the books, but it could be about white nationalism marketed at white Europeans. You're just listing how it is in the books, why couldn't it be changed if "that's how it is in the books" isn't a valid reason? See fricktard? You didn't provide a single fricking reason.
>To conceal his identity like a superhero and a sword happens to be his weapon of choice
Wouldn't a full face mask more effectively conceal his identity? Why couldn't he have another weapon of choice like a spear or an axe? Oh, oh, because that's how it is "in the book"? You don't have any actual fricking reason you autistic weirdo lmfao.
Your entire argument boils down to "I don't like it, so it doesn't matter if that's what it says in the book -BUT I DO LIKE IT OTHER TIMES SO THEN IT MATTERS!"
I accept your concession.
You're not even trying anymore, your concession is accepted. Stay mad and stay told.
>I never said I desired to change it,
YOUR CONCESSION IS ACCEPTED. Thanks for admitting you're wrong, homosexual.
>Having a great performance from an average height man
Out with it dicklicker, who the frick is it you're trying to push? Who's balls are being warmed by your tongue as we speak? Which micromanlet is it you want to deep dick? It's obvious you have someone in mind, homosexual.
You *asserting* "It's not important" isn't an argument, it's you stating your worthless personal opinion.
>Your concession status: accepted
Das rite, you did concede b***h.
No you, Mr. Potty mouth, are in fact the one who has concede. I, Mr. Handsome, accept your concession.
But it is actually I who is Mr. Handsome, and you are dubbed Ugly Doodie-Face.
Nah
>who the frick is it you're trying to push?
I think I would be a pretty good Judge
Then post a picture. Timestamped of course. But douse yourself in baby powder first so you sort of look the part.
it would be extremely cringe to actually have him be full white in a film
It would be extremely cringe to change it because some autistic moron online hates white people. He's supposed to be a supernatural figure. He's as close to being one as a person can be without it being something genuinely fantastical. He claims to be immortal. Albinos exist, big frickers exist, hairless people exist. It's entirely possible for someone to look like him, in fact he's inspired by a specific, actual person. The combination of qualities gives him a creepy appearance.
"I don't like it" isn't a fricking argument.
>It would be extremely cringe to change it because some autistic moron online hates white people.
Quote the posts where I said anything that even remotely hints at that sweetie.
>He's supposed to be a supernatural figure.
And you prioritise a halloween costume over an actor who could give a great performance because you need everything spelled out for you like a comic book.
>"I don't like it" isn't a fricking argument.
Never once did I say I wouldn't like it if the Judge is tall, bald, and pale. I said it isn't as important as you make it out to be.
He definitely has to be a white man though because of all the racism in the novel.
>change it because some autistic moron
I think forcing it to work when it just doesn't look good on camera just because it's that way in the book is way more autistic
>It just doesn't work.
Wrong yet again.
>clown makeup works for the... clown character
wow you're a genius
>You're not providing any reason it should be changed from how it's described.
Finding a great actor who could play the role extremely well but who is average height, just white skinned, and has hair would be preferable to a big white guy who isn't that much of an actor just because he fits the description in the book.
The Judge is more than the sum of those 3 qualities, and a great performance is far more important than his superficial physical characteristics.
Seething autists can't contain themselves when asked a simple question; provide no arguments.
I know, he was asked "Why not" and couldn't come up with a single response! What a fricking spergy moron lmfao.
Obvious Samegay is Samegay
>My entire argument is a book I clearly didn't read and know frickall about.
Another L for you. Judge should look like he's described in the book confirmed. Eat a dick, we both know you want to.
>Judge should look like he's described in the book confirmed
Why?
Do you people understand one of the most basic and common single word questions in the English language?
Why?
>Why?
Because that's what people want. People don't want things changed from their description, that's the entire point of adaptation you belligerent homosexual.
Now point blank, answer me WHY NOT? Why the FRICK does it need to be changed? Give an actual fricking reason. But you don't have one. You just want it to be different because you're a disgusting narcissist with your own stupid, worthless fricking idea of what it should be. You got an answer and you will in return respond with nothing because you know you have nothing.
You're delusional and confused and started a meaningless argument, fighting for a moot point.
When AI can make movies for us actors will be out of a job because of autists like this who just want an exact copy of a story projected into a media that lessens the quality of the story
BUT AT LEAST IT MATCHES THE DESCRIPTION IN LE BOOK
Good. They get paid obscene amounts of money to play pretend.
So you concede you have no compelling argument? Good. Glad you realized you're wrong homosexual.
BECAUSE HE IS DESCRIBED AS SUCH. Just get this guy, he fits all the criteria and has le acting talent too boost.
True Detective had two great candidates for the role.
He is described that way in real life and the book.
>I've yet to see a compelling argument as to why the Judge must be tall, pale, or bald.
He needs to look otherwordly and strange, kinda the whole point of his character mate.
Finally, a real answer.
I agree, but does that specifically mean pale, tall, and bald?
I like Ritchson for the simple fact that he makes lefties seethe. On that fancast subreddit it infuriates the people there that he gets suggested basically for every superhero, because they had it pretty locked down that every character only gets recommended raceswaps. Someone says "Who should play Kang now?" it's just every black guy ever even if they make no sense even in the context of Majors, but someone always suggests Ritchson and the sheer assrage they spew about it is hilarious. They've tried to turn it into a meme just to make it stop because it's all twitter lefties.
I got two of them so angry the other day they deleted all of their comments.
he's the right size I guess but he's a shitty actor, at least if Reacher is anything to go by.
Do we need another Batman bigger than Superman?
Ben Affleck is unironically one of the truest Chads in Hollywood
Game recognizes game
Best Batman easily, a man's man. Bale and Pattinson are effeminate Brits. Brits should not play American superheroes.
The gayest Batman by far was an American (Kilmer)
The worst one was also American (Clooney)
So? American character, American actor. Batfleck was the best.
>change the goalposts
What does them sucking affect those two facts?
>The gayest Batman by far was an American (Kilmer)
Damn I forgot about pouty lips. To be fair schumacker is a gay and his movies feel gay as frick.
Frick capeshit.
>still not a single argument as to why the Judge HAS to be tall, pale, or bald other than "cUz tHe boOk SAys sO [proceed to name call]"
>Alan Ritchson as Batman
>Ursula Corbero as Catwoman
>Bill Skarsgaard as Joker
>Sophia Lillis as Batgirl
>Shea Wigham as Gordon
>David Thewlis as Alfred
2 billies and Pattinson's gay Batman is forgotten.
Please, fricking enough of the joker.
Would Promethus ever work for a movie?
It only depends on how they do Joker. If he's fun and charismatic like Nicholson then why not?
Because the Black person's in everything.
The dude died twice in the Arkhamverse and they're still bringing him back in the upcoming trainwreck.
Same with Harley, fricking enough of her.
>Ursula Corbero as Catwoman
dude she would be a great Catwoman.
How will you see his eyes through the mask?
>damian
this shit's gonna be garbage.
tim is so irrelevant they made him gay
Whose the kid below him
I don't know who either of those people are, but the kid would be a really good Damian Wayne. Although I would have used this era as the reference picture, not the one they went with. Assuming the one in OP's picture is even Damian, I really have no idea what how they draw him in current year.
Michael Keaton has always been terrible casting. He was a comedy actor and he had no place playing Batman. What was Burton thinking, seriously? Of all the talent in the late 80s and the kino Batman comics of the time...he chooses Keaton to be the dark knight.
At least Nicholson made up for it, I guess.
Batthad
Darin Brooks as Robin
>Chris Romano as Edward Nigma
His sister was hot
Was being the key word
Ed Marinaro as Alfred
Rob Ramsay as Oswald "The Penguin" Cobblepot
Page Kennedy as Bane
>WHO PAID YOU TO SHIT ON THE FOOTBALL?
Something about him just strikes me as fitting better in an Aquaman role.
Wasn't he already Aquaman?
Yea, just kind of a joke, wondering if anyone would notice.
i like that they keep bringing back smallville actors for reacher, lana was in s1 and zatanna is in s2
THAT'S WHERE I KNOW HER FROM!
Honestly could not figure it out, knew I knew her, just didn't put it together.
It's wild how well they all aged, even the crazy one.
That makes me think they kept in touch and are friends or something.
Again imagine those squinty eyes in a batman mask
sydney Sweeney as catwoman and we get to watch batman pound her, full penetration
I hate the DC mandate and I hate Damian homosexual Wayne.