I think all works should be public domain 10 years after release.
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
I think all works should be public domain 10 years after release.
I think all works should be public domain 10 years after release.
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
I think you should shut the frick up and give me my money.
Make it 3, i want a chaotic future where 90% of the yearly releases are just competing spiderman/batman movies made by different studios
I think Tigger is cute and I would hug him
Nah, that's crazy. The second the creator dies.
>make my magnum opus
>now have to live in fear of getting assassinated so ~~*they*~~ can sell toys of my highly marketable character
Dial it back bro
Just hire a bodyguard or get good at defending yourself. You aren't one of those pathetic weaklings from CalArts, right?
Why? Copyright has been around for a few hundred years tops, for the majority of history people have told stories whenever and however they want. Copyright shouldn’t exist.
Creator's life + 20 years. That way he can leave a small legacy without his estate turning into parasites.
I think op's rectum should be public domain.
It's not? :3
Show some of your original works
I think all works and ideas should instantly become public domain. Let the best of the best succeed, even if the original idea was not their own.
Unironically the only good use of the public domain is making sure that media is preserved without corporate interference. The homosexuals just wanting an excuse to make a buck off their gay ass fan fics need to be kicked square in the nuts.
howbout you can own your creation for your life but you can't sell or bequeath it
3 years after everyone involved is dead.
3 years after the last person listed in the credits on Starwars is dead, it's free. Even if it's the assistant boom mic operator.
30-40 years sounds fitting. That's enough for somebody retired to still get money for around their remaining lifetime (the intent of extending the limit to public domain) while still being short enough that people can see material they still remember entering public domain in their lifetime. The lowest time would reasonably be 20 years: Enough for one generation, meaning kids who grew up with the copyrighted work can end up using it once they're adults and creating on their own.
Abolish all IP and popular art will flourish again tbqh.
Current copy write laws are one of the single most disgusting things to exist in the modern world. This shit is populaur because people made it so, and yet our culture is locked behind all this bullshit.
Our history, our culture, the creative stuff we make, it's all owned by some rich company. We should be able to draw mickey mouse and make money off it! The mouse c**t is like 100 years old. It's fricking mental.
Even the defense is bullshit. "It helps protect creators" like, no you ignorant c**t. It was MADE for rich people. It was MADE to protect companies, in one of the most disgusting times in USA history.
just move to a country without copyright laws
I'd rather make the one I live in better, you stupid homosexual. the right wing in my country is an abomination that we're fighting as hard as we can.
why are you so upset about the concept of property?
>he thinks it's only right wingers
>I think all works should be public domain 10 years after release.
eh that's probably too low, I'd just revert it back to how it was in the Copyright Act of 1909(eliminating the extensions added in the Copyright Act of 1976 and the Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998) where Copyright would last for 28 years and then the owner had the option to extend it for a single additional 28 year term(and it had to be manually applied for, not something automatically granted), 56 years I'd say is a fair maximum amount of time for someone to have exclusive control over a property
>abolish copyright
>the only way people can afford to do creative work is through patronage of or commissions
>this gives the wealthy an outsized stake in the creative process
we did it patrick, we saved the arts!
>the only way people can afford to do creative work is through patronage of or commissions
This is how the greatest art in the Western canon was made, so I wouldn't say that's a bad system to return to.
>This is how the greatest art in the Western canon was made
Work of that quality is still made now, all that would change is that it would be made in such a manner that YOU wouldn't be able to consume it.
Indeed. My point was diminishing or abolishing copyright wouldn't be some great victory for the arts and artists as some ITT seem to think
Publishing creative works is fricking easy now with the internet though.
Ten years seems too short, I would say 21 years with the option, when it is close to expiring, to manually apply for an extension to 50 years.
A few years to give you a chance to make some money off it and get a presence in any relevant markets, then it's free for all. Patents should be much the same.
Intellectual property is statist nonsense
https://mises.org/library/against-intellectual-property-0
20 years subject to renewal by continued works seems fair. If im still releasing new books 40 years later then i should still deserve ownership of the original. Obviously that only applies to continuous serieses which can be considered a continuous single work, reboots and remakes dont count
Abolish Patents. Extend Copyright. Frick what Cinemaphile thinks.
14 years after registration with the US copyright office. Another 14 year extension only if they can prove the original product is still in production and legally available at price not higher than what it was originally sold for. Public domain after that, or if the product is ever written off for tax reasons. All products registered at the copyright office should be freely available at any time by any person for any reason.