>As long as the artist isn't too profilic in the nsfw space and doesn't draw anything that's problematic its usually fine
Frick that shit. Milo Manara should be 100 percent OK to use. And the rules for "problematic" are just an excuse to randomly frick people over when screaming frickheads invent new ways of being oppressed.
It's been awhile since I looked at any of it, but I feel like he's one of those artists who used to have a great style with its own flair but fell down the rabbit hole of exaggerating that style more and more until it lost all of its subtle appeal.
And a perfect example of why "problematic" is a spook. Dickgirls have jumped back and forth on whether they're problematic or not at least 4 times in my lifetime.
>anymore
Not that long ago they brought on a futa porn artist and Sejic put out lesbian bdsm porn for several years and he did the Harleen book and would still be doing DC work if he didn't get burned out on working for them.
People who say this are usually some old ass gen x boomer on YouTube grifting for money for their $50 independent comic project drawn by huehues.
There's a ton of artists at Marvel and DC and many of them have drawn at least nudes publicly, more still will draw you nudes if you commission them.
if you are an artist and have never drawn porn/erotic, then you simply don't know how to draw, it's not like making porn is a requirement, but every artist learns by watching and copying thousand upon thousands of nude bodies in every position, saying that a nsfw is problematic doesn't make sense
I actually love long noses, and it’s hard to find artists that don’t just skip the nose and put a little dot at the end of it, or draw half a nostril and call it done.
Thanks, OP. I’m gonna go give this guy a follow. Maybe hit up his Patreon.
>I thought DC/Marvel didn't hire lewd artists anymore.
That's because you listened to Cinemaphile. Rookie mistake. Cinemaphile acts like Kris Ankha draws every big two book.
Who?
Their @ in the damn image.
Meant the Goth chick.
As long as the artist isn't too profilic in the nsfw space and doesn't draw anything that's problematic its usually fine
>As long as the artist isn't too profilic in the nsfw space and doesn't draw anything that's problematic its usually fine
Frick that shit. Milo Manara should be 100 percent OK to use. And the rules for "problematic" are just an excuse to randomly frick people over when screaming frickheads invent new ways of being oppressed.
jej I bought one of his posters after that shit went down
Look I believe that fanservice is harmless but can we stop dying on the Milo Manara hill? His faces are really off putting.
Milo Manara is kinda unappealing in the way that like old school ultra skinny sports illustrated type women are.
It's been awhile since I looked at any of it, but I feel like he's one of those artists who used to have a great style with its own flair but fell down the rabbit hole of exaggerating that style more and more until it lost all of its subtle appeal.
You're both idiots. Otto Schmitt is one of the top guys at DC and he practically created the dickgirl genre of western cartoon porn
And a perfect example of why "problematic" is a spook. Dickgirls have jumped back and forth on whether they're problematic or not at least 4 times in my lifetime.
>problematic
Yea no frick off puritan.
>anymore
Not that long ago they brought on a futa porn artist and Sejic put out lesbian bdsm porn for several years and he did the Harleen book and would still be doing DC work if he didn't get burned out on working for them.
Does Marvel hire any of them though?
Yeah, Carlos Gomez draws nudes of Marvel characters on his patreon and he has regular marvel books
Creator of Harleen is a porn artist.
The artist draw moronic faces. 5/10
All artists are lewd, you have to hire lewd artists to have art at all. I guess you could use AI, but AI is lewd too.
>All artists are lewd
Maybe but no publicly
Good, it shouldn't be normalize like it's your personality
It's just a element of humanity, not the only element of humanity.
Being a homosexual shouldn't be the only element of your personality.
Non arguments doesn't make it the only element of your critiquing skills.
People who say this are usually some old ass gen x boomer on YouTube grifting for money for their $50 independent comic project drawn by huehues.
There's a ton of artists at Marvel and DC and many of them have drawn at least nudes publicly, more still will draw you nudes if you commission them.
if you are an artist and have never drawn porn/erotic, then you simply don't know how to draw, it's not like making porn is a requirement, but every artist learns by watching and copying thousand upon thousands of nude bodies in every position, saying that a nsfw is problematic doesn't make sense
That's an moronic take anon, there's tons of people who never drew that shit and can draw.
POST FIVE PEOPLE
Almost any Christian cartoonist.
boom.
>can’t name one
>just assumes people he can’t even name are exactly as he imagined
Yes and everyone who works on children’s shows is a wholesome, trustworthy person too.
There's a difference between "porn" and "nudes". I know christian artists who've drawn nudes who have no taste for porn or erotica.
That's what I was getting at but anon too stupid to realize.
>There's a difference between "porn" and "nudes"
Hurr durr
Just like there's a difference between cartoons and anime lol
There is, even if some uritans deny it.
>that face
western porn should be banned
She looks fine, quit being a picky ass weeb, that has to have everything look like typical modern big eye no nose shit.
I actually love long noses, and it’s hard to find artists that don’t just skip the nose and put a little dot at the end of it, or draw half a nostril and call it done.
Thanks, OP. I’m gonna go give this guy a follow. Maybe hit up his Patreon.
funny thing is, Gleb is a weeb. He drew this.
>Who is Otto Schmidt and Stjepan Seijic?
Die already
D I C K
G
I
R
L
S
I’m practically a virgin and even I can spot misplaced pudendas
DC also got Homare to draw a Black Canary cover for Green Arrow #6.
Is DC more lewd than Marvel now?
Their women still look like women in most stuff and they allow them to be sexual, I can't name any recent Marvel stuff like that.
>last step in a bimbofication spectrum
that's actually pretty good
source?
X-terminators
Mutants alone are lewder than all of DC.
I don't know DC still has sex scenes.
?feature=shared&t=14
Here's hardcore porn artist Dima imanov doing a cover for DC
The difference from OP is good art
Didnt they hire Anasheya, who used to draw exclusively Futa porn?
>I thought DC/Marvel didn't hire lewd artists anymore.
That's because you listened to Cinemaphile. Rookie mistake. Cinemaphile acts like Kris Ankha draws every big two book.
Ironically Ankha has a "hidden" porn twitter.
and your point is?
You thought DC/Marvel didn't hire lewd artists anymore
They want to make him really gay
Also DC hires way too many porngays