>"i want a boy friend so badly"
>"NOOOOO I DONT WANT A GUY WHOS ATTRACTED TO ME HES A CREEP"
I fricking hate this brat, she should be grateful any guy at all is interested in her at all. If she wants a boyfriend so bad yet gets offended by guys that actually do like her shes a fricking c**t who needs to lower her standards. I hate women who complain about guys yet constantly b***h about not having "le perfect man". Fricking c**ts
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Rudy is a creep though, she and the team tolerate him way past what would be socially expected
its almost like the life or death struggle of Earth's survival is mired in bureaucracies of adhering to the whims of psychotic metahumans staying happy enough to fight for your side is a toxic hellscape I hope we never have to experience in real life
good thing its a work of fiction
I'm not sure if this is referencing autistic scientists that can make stuff like contagious flesh calcifying diseases or super ebola being bought out by govt. shell companies and black projects so they are kept happy through fat paychecks and blackmail or not.
>Rudy is a creep though
You thinking this is more the problem than rudy, I guarantee if rudy was a girl you wouldn't think that.
I would still find them to be creepy because if I was forced to be a shota for my entire life I would want the age difference to stay intact because busty b***hes are hot.
Which part was supposed to be creepy?
The part where he stole the appearance of one of his teammates and adjusted his age to match the age of another without establishing it beforehand essentially putting both on the spot to either go along with his shit or look like cruel buttholes
Also he picked out Rex's body because he thought Amanda likes him which is creepy as hell
They were being buttholes to him for being a robot so they reap what they sow.
They were playfully ribbing their teammate the same way they all playfully rib one another. If he didn’t like it he only needed to speak up and set boundaries and they would have cut back. Anyone who isn’t autistic can see it’s nowhere near comparable.
Sounds like they should have done the same thing instead of being passive aggressive c**ts.
They couldn’t exactly just ask him to undo the cloning. Unlike with a distasteful comment, there is no room for take backsies there. That’s exactly why it was on him to talk to them BEFORE he did it- so he could assess their boundaries.
You're not going to convince a bitter sperg that any form of perceived revenge can be unjustified.
>They couldn’t exactly just ask him to undo the cloning.
Yeah, they could. Robot clearly cares a lot about fitting in, he'd figure it out.
Autism.
Extremely funny to see people who only watch the show relitigate stuff that was resolved in the comic over a decade ago.
Wait until you see what Rudy does next!
ITT: I'm not a pedo, but...
FBI, scan this guy's hard drive.
Hmm...... damn brat !!
have a nice day, pedogay.
Her entire character is that she's wrong about everything out of spite. That's her role.
>I fricking hate this brat, she should be grateful any guy at all is interested in her at all.
Funny thing is she's realistic. That one chick who stopped aging and looks like one of those telepath kids from Akira has the exact same mentality.
>it’s realistic because it’s just like this other fictional character
Anon?
>Cinemaphile's reading comprehension
Are you guys awere of what happens with Rudy later in the story?
No, enlighten us
He eventually is proven to be a megalomaniac control freak and a terrible person
He did go through 700 years though, that would change a person
Yes and the comic shows that in the end he was absolutely right.
Nice job leaving that out to defend your moronic jailbait character, cum stain.
He's proven right multiple times?
Yes. They're already showing he has control freak tendencies so it makes sense he does what he does.
He's lived half a normal lifespan with absolutely no agency. So of course he's getting drunk on ALL THIS AGENCY, they even keep making him team leader. Being stuck for decades in a jar would seriously frick someone up.
I think what he wanted in the end wasn't wrong. His method was "efficient" for a machine's standard. But people aren't machines.
Would've liked a story line where he digitizes his conciousness as a digital life form instead of being a brain in a jar.
>His method was "efficient" for a machine's standard.
>criminals arent real bro
>just bribe them and they'll be nice!
This is moronic.
Should do what Amanda Waller does and put bombs in their necks.
I got the vibe she was gonna end up with the chud character on the team since they were awkwardly flirting
Ever watch this show, anon? I think you'd like it.
Not remotely the same. They try to pass her off as a young girl but she's more of a dwarf with tattoos and everything.
I'm not comparing the looks. The woman in that shows deals with the exact same dilemma of wanting to bang, but not wanting to bang men who like how she looks. It's insane, like many self-imposed female problems.
This is a trap that ends up with most women who do not have a standard body type.
>i want a man who loves me for me, not how i look!
Except they're usually a b***h so it's hard to like the personality as opposed to just fetishizing fats, midgets and trannies
>Waaaaaaah why does this adult woman who happens to look like a kid because of a curse/rare disorder doesn't want to frick pedophiles??????
Don't be moronic
>then accept no one wants to do anything with you because your entire existence makes them uncomfortable
>NOOOOOO I DESERVE A RELATIONSHIP
This is how these women sound like.
If you want to frick her because she looks like a kid, you are a pedophile.
If you say anything along the lines of "b-but she's not ACKSHUALLY a kid", you are a pedophile looking for a loophole.
If you try to argue with this, you are a pedophile in denial.
She literally is an adult so she can consent
But she looks like a kid. She is physically a kid. If someone was attracted to her for reasons besides that, then they might have a leg to stand on, but we both know that most, if not all people who want to frick her want to do so because she looks like a kid, and they would frick actual kids if they could get away with it. Therefore, anyone who wants to frick her is a pedophile looking for a loophole.
The difference is that she can consent legally
That doesn't fricking matter. If you want to frick her because she looks like a kid, you're a pedophile. If you try to justify it, you're a pedophile looking for a loophole. No ifs, ands or buts.
>look I'm just right, no matter what
Sounds like something a pedophile would say.
The reason why fricking kids is taboo is because they aren’t of age to understand the potential consequences needed to consent to sex. She has the ability to consent to sex.
No, it's taboo for a myriad of reasons, one that being sexually attracted to a body with no sexual traits the body develops to attract a mate is not normal. Fricking an undeveloped body will harm it and if by chance gets pregnant it might frick it for life since having a period does not equal having a fully developed womb+hip structure.
Then you go to the obvious part of not being able to consent and most likely being taken advantage of someone who is much older than the child.
The case with monster girl speaks that the man who wants to frick her is sexually attracted to the body of minors.
So what you're saying is that it's fine as long as the girl has a "stretch armstrong"-like body
>being sexually attracted to a body with no sexual traits the body develops to attract a mate is not normal.
doesn't matter, lots of stuff isn't normal, not being normal =/= wrong
>Fricking an undeveloped body will harm it and if by chance gets pregnant it might frick it for life since having a period does not equal having a fully developed womb+hip structure
bad example because the implication there is that assuming no harm is done or it's done at the correct time, no damage will be done therefore your point is useless
Ultimately, being a pedo is wrong because the victims cannot consent, simple as that.
Whether adult or child, lack of consent makes the act wrong, and since kids literally aren't capable of it, it's wrong.
Body type attraction doesn't matter, lack of consent matters everything else is unnecessary muddying of the waters giving a chance for a better argument to come through.
I don't give a frick about a hypothetical pedo or a fictional pedo, I care about pedos that actually do things.
Does her brain reverse age?
I took her brattishness as a sign that she is also mentally regressing. If not, then the show is going out of their way to make most of the female characters unlikeable.
>24 year old woman
>mature
lol
lmao
even if it isnt mental regression.
So what is it to you? You sound very invested.
Im a white knight keeping pedos from jerking it to kids
Sounds like projection harbouring guilt. There are no children for you to save, here, only faps you regret.
She has a child body.
From context i can glean out of this thread it sounds like she's a selfish b***h that doesnt consider how her situation affects either it reminds me of..
Except y'know.. its a child body.
I want to frick her because maybe this is one of those bloodline curses and it will make our children also be functionally immortal like her.
she is making me quite upset with her antics!!!!!
Artist?
Mahnapuu
>no one updates her shit on kemono
sad
I want to frick her just to make you mad. If she cures herself and ages to be 40+ I'll still frick her just because it makes you angry. If you argue with this you're just hiding your butthurt.
Schizos who think reality and fiction are the same deserve the rope
>look just cause I want to frick kids doesn't mean I want to frick kids
Hmmmm
Shes a cartoon character
If no actual kids get hurt then it shouldnt fricking matter. In universe shes a legally consenting adult and in reality shes a fictional character. Frick off moralgay
You are commiting a thought crime
cartoon character that looks like?
Do pixels on a screen made to simulate act like and give the experience of X that you can murder abuse or otherwise harm in cold blood make you a murderer fit to be put on trial or detained on criminal charges?
What about hunting/abusing animals that are endangered or protected, if they are also fictional, not alive, 2D representations of the real thing?
What about consuming content that shows (fictional) death or grievous harm to others, are those snuff films? Is performing GTA in GTA, the game, the same thing as doing it in real life?
>If no actual kids get hurt then it shouldnt fricking matter
It doesn't change the fact that YOU WANT TO FRICK KIDS and the only thing keeping you from doing so is the fear of consequences, not any moral or ethical concerns.
Says you
>YOU WANT TO FRICK KIDS
NO I WANT TO FRICK HER and if it was the "fear of consequences" I'd move to a third world shit hole and pay 5 dollars.
>NO I WANT TO FRICK HER
we have a confession folks!
You seem like the kind of person whose anti pedo crusade stops the minute it comes to someone with power and authority being a pedo like a judge or a cop or a fedcoat, then you'll do whatever they say
Look goy, the cattle are supposed to breed and serve. Deviancy is to be stamped out
And you seem like the kind of person worried about pedos being called out.
Nah, I call them out all the time, but the actually dangerous high level ones with power like tony podesta who have been getting away with it
>"How dare you only pick on the LITTLE pedos, huh?"
lmao
Now tell me about how people who jerk off to rape doujins actually want to rape someone.
Tell me about how people who frick hookers in GTA and then murder them to get their money back actually want to kill people in real life.
You won't.
You'll just keep cherry picking and twisting things to how you want them to be because you're projecting what you want to do to real kids onto people who keep it purely fictional.
homosexual.
literally a worse argument than food analogies
it's very simple moron-kun
you could choose to jerk off to fictional adults
but you choose to jerk off to fictional kids
your argument is bad and you should feel bad.
Tell me the people who jerk off to rape doujins want to rape someone and aren't jerking off to the thought of being raped themselves
i mean is that any different from people wanting to kill other people but refrain from doing so for fear of getting arrested and charged with murder?
Justified killings aren't murder
Yeah and cycle of revenge doesn't exist.
You gleefully murder people in video games and the only thing keeping you from doing so is fear of consequences, not any moral or ethical concerns.
See how stupid that sounds.
None of these statements are actual arguments and you just want to be mad for people enjoying things. Paper doesn't get human rights
>it doesnt get human rights if i want to frick it
How white of you
>thinking cartoons should have rights
Holy moral fascism batman
Who are you really trying to convince that you're not a pedophile? Us or yourself?
>no u
I accept your concession
Have fun in prison, Jared from Subway.
>baby rape is the same as drawings
Better wipe those gta saves.
Most school shooters played gta so youre absolutely right. Parents shouldnt be able to buy violent video games for kids and e-girlsho should be regulated on the internet. Websites hosting eroticart of cartoon characters should be arrested or fined.
Literal dystopia wanting moral fascists like you should be put into the ground
Go to bed Jack Thompson
>Most school shooters
We're on ssri and other mood drugs. So we can find anyone on these and can lock them up. Glad we agree.
Moral fascists like you should be shot behind a barn.
>I can't answer the question
You want to frick X.
X looks what?
You want to frick what.
(0-0)
Its
Not
Real
You daft c**t
>its just a prank bro
Answer
The
Fricking
Question
You homosexual
>Paper doesn't get human rights
Okay so if I fap to the hardest of hardcore gay manga or comic I am not ACTUALLY gay because it's just paper right? If I fap to a horse being fricked or a dog fricking a woman in a manga, I am not really into bestiality because - hey - it's just a drawing!
Don't be moronic. If you fap to e-girl/shota, you're into kids. End of. No discussion.
>b-b-but drawings a-and
Irrelevant to your attraction
>b-b-but idealised and propor-
Not an excuse, see my above. I am suddenly 'not' gay because despite joiking it to two men with wieners in their bums because it's a drawing? Frick off lol.
If you've ever killed someone in a video game, you should be on a list.
I'm not attracted to femboys irl but i fap to femboy art.
it's just fiction you moron.
Fictional horses aren't real horses
Fictional men can't turn you gay
If you're turned on by fiction, you have sexual preference for that subject manner. Just because you wouldn't frick a guy in real life doesn't mean that enjoying hardocre yaoi isn't gay.
not being able to determine fiction from reality is a sign of sub room temp iq anon. there’s homosexuals that jack off to traps but irl they find them disgusting as i’m sure you don’t. do you think liking villains in movies makes you want to murder people too?
Jacking off to traps, fictional or otherwise, is still gay lol
Yea but like. Nobody here is gonna want to try to frick a fictional cartoon character.
I'm a fictional pedo then. Much like you are a fictional intellectual.
So rape is ok if the woman likes rape porn.
Rape is an action, not a sexual preference
>an action
So it's ok to be into rape but not rape?
Yes but you can be gay without ever touching another dude's schlong, that's how sexual preferences work.
So if you want to frick cartoons but not people...
Cartoons representative of what? A guy that jacks it off to only animated gay porn is still gay.
>Cartoons representative of what?
Of this.
is that sam'onella?
Rape doesn't exist. All women are either bawds or secret bawds.
shame no woman ever has been into rape roleplay
oh, wait
So they can like rape when it's fake? Interesting.
Yeah plenty of people want to frick cartoon femboys but are repulsed at actual gay sex that’s a pretty shitty example bro lmao
Morality does play into what we enjoy, someone can enjoy a horror movie because it’s fictional, but doesn’t enjoy experiencing actual graphic violence in real life. Someone can feel freely attracted to a variety of fictional characters, but find the idea of raping a real world equivalent to one of those characters to be abhorent and off putting, because of their own morals. You don’t automatically count as a rapist of adult women if you find adult women attractive.
>You don’t automatically count as a rapist of adult women if you find adult women attractive.
it's time to stop posting, grandpa.
>I am not ACTUALLY gay because it's just paper right
This is why the line between fantasy and reality exists. People who want to frick literal horses in fantasy dont want to do that shit in real life unless they are stupid or mentally ill. Women who fantasize about being raped don't actually want that shit to happen. Guys who fantasize about hardcore CBT or humiliation don't actually want that shit to happen. Your logic seems to think everyone is incapable of, 1. differentiating between fantasy and reality, and 2. is unaware of the literal dimensional boundary between 2D, 3D, and fictional universes.
Or do you actually think women want to be raped and men want to be castrated or humiliated?
>People who want to frick literal horses in fantasy dont want to do that shit in real life unless they are stupid or mentally ill. Women who fantasize about being raped don't actually want that shit to happen. Guys who fantasize about hardcore CBT or humiliation don't actually want that shit to happen.
But there are people who actually do enjoy doing those things...
> Your logic seems to think everyone is incapable of, 1. differentiating between fantasy and reality, and 2. is unaware of the literal dimensional boundary between 2D, 3D, and fictional universes.
I think that anon's perspective is less what you're saying and more that fantasies don't exist in a vacuum. People are aware of fiction and reality, and that's why people who fantasize about fricking horses might not frick actual horses, but that doesn't mean they don't "want" to frick actual horses.
Thoughts(fiction) -> Actions(reality)
Fantasies are thoughts, and people who are aware of how acting out their thoughts(turning thoughts to actions) can have disasterous consequences placate this desire by engaging in mock behavior like masturbation or roleplay. It's a way to indulge in fantasy without having to deal with consequences.
The notion that fantasy is in no way indicative of someone's irl preferences or desires would imply that it's completely random which fantasies any given person would have. You'd have just as many straight people watching gay porn as they would straight porn if there were no correlation. Women with large boobs in fiction would be just as engaging as men with tiny dicks if there were no real world mapping for preferences.
We can even get clued in culturally and see that cultures with certain irl preferences for what they like sexually map onto the kinds of fictionalized characters they like.
Black folk are illiterate
Fantasies eventually become reality
Got it, thought crime bullshit. Glad I didn't read it.
Nobody said it was a crime illiterate-kun. Just explaining how the world works.
tl:dr Fantasies are indicative of irl desires, but how those desires manifest as actions can be tempered by mock behavior.
>Petite women should kill themselves
you're being disingenuous anon. 'petite' women are rarely 'child appearing' or below 5'1. except for rare cases, women with dwarfism don't look like children
however
if you see [small humanoid] and think "THATS A FRICKING CHILDERINO" then the person fricked in the head is likely you and you cope with it by projecting it on others
That depends how you define child, because if you include anyone under 18 then adults can very easily appear underage, and underage people can sometimes even look like adults. I have an adult female relative in her 20s who gets mistaken for a teenager because she’s short, skinny and baby faced.
>I have an adult female relative in her 20s
>in her 20's
oh wow her 20's anon wow her 20's in current fricking year it's a fricking nothing burger this is why you have government issued I.Ds.
Tell me how your 30 something relative gets mistaken for a child and then we talk but <25 come the frick on you fricking moron get out of my thread
So age does matter. Monster girl is how old again?
20s is an adult whether you like it or not. Unless you are implying the only way someone could not be a pedophile is if they are exclusively attracted to 30+ people, but then all you’re doing is pushing it up. You’ll have people in their 30s who look like they are in their 20s I know a couple of those irl as well.
reading comprehension
get some
my point was saying a 20 year old still looks like a teenager is the shittest of arguments. the majority of 18-20 year olds still look underage in current year. And your argument would be a bit more valid if you had someone who's 28-31 getting comments that they look like a 17-20 year old still.
some people just have good genetics.
Are you saying that an 11 year old and a 17 year old are fundamentally the same thing since that's the same age difference between a 17 year old and a 23 year old?
Meant for
This entire thread is about a drawing of a fictional character anon…
'Petite' women with no ass, no breasts, and no hips shouldn't be considered attractive by any heterosexual man with the slightest trace of testosterone in his body
Ah, the ad-hom, final refuge of the defeated troll.
y
w
n
b
a
w
I guess wanting to kill people in video games) or watch people get killed, die horrifically in actual videos of real life people dying, or read about people getting murdered, watch documentaries about it, all make people murderers then? And also women with rape fantasies actually really just want to get raped, and video games make people more violent too. Can't forget that.
Do you see how fricking stupid blurring the fantasy/reality line for one thing is when that line of reasoning is literally pants-on-head moronic for anything else?
>t.thechomoisraeliteWhoCriedSchizo
delusional 100% you have a mental cognition that inclines you to be a predator
Stop shaming short flat women by proxy, Karen.
You sick psycho watching violent shows
If you want to frick characters that are children and look like children
>Pedo
If you want to frick characters that are adults but look like children
>Pedo
If you want to frick characters that are children and look like adults
>Pedo
If you want to frick characters that are adults and look like adults, but have small breasts
>Pedo
If you want to frick characters that are adults and look like adults, but are short
>Pedo
If you want to frick characters that are adults and look like adults, have giant breasts, are tall but are from an anime
>Pedo
Very cool
>look man in a hypothetical situation. Its not real bro
>im choosing to jerk off to imaginary children instead of imaginary people over the legal age but im not a pedo
Go back to twitter neo puritan trash
There are people who have medical condition in which they do not age like normal. One of them has their own TV show. What those other anons are pointing out is very real for some people.
Who is this? Who is the character in the first post? I have no idea what you people are talking about. Give me some context so that I know who root for and who to dis.
make your own assumptions like the allegedly grown man you are, homosexual
Op pic is a grown woman who was regressed into a childs body andbtje othe pic is a grown woman with a mwducal condición where she never grew past puberty
It's a woman that wasn't able to hit puberty due to undergoing chemotherapy when she was still an infant due to an abnormal growth in her brain. The result is that her pituitary glands were irreversibly damaged so she stayed looking like an 8 year old.
>schizos
Okay, tell someone IRL you jerk off to drawings of little girls and see if they think you're a pedo, moron
How often do you talk to other people in real life about what you jerk off to?
With your guy friends, it's pretty common. Hell, you could even just express attraction to a drawing of a little girl and see what people say. Not that you have any of those, but that question is just cope to run from the fact that if anyone knew you jerked it to do drawings of little girls, they would call you a pedophile.
And if they you knew you jerked of to rape porn on bdsm sites?
>it's common to discuss your fapping habits with your male friends
Sounds pretty gay, Anon. I don't know where you're from but I think that would be an incredibly uncomfortable conversation for most people. Not once have I ever done that nor have any of my male friends shared their fapping preferences with me.
You're attracted to children, moron. Doesn't matter if you only jack it to the drawings
>jacks off to a drawing of a wiener
>its just a drawing bro, doesnt mean im ACTUALLY gay
alright man
>Watches porn with men in it
You're not fooling anyone anon. Just because that penis is going into a woman doesn't mean that you're not gay. Straight men don't watch porn with other men in it.
>'I'm not gay. I only jerk off to fictional men'
This is how fricking stupid you sound, gay
Do futanaris count as men?
True futanari does not. It's still gay, but she's not a man.
But a lot of shit gets called "futanari" when it's just penis, even worse if it's dick + balls. That's a man.
Futanari have dick + balls + pussy though.
Futas are gayer than traps.
not all futas have balls.
True futas have dick but no balls. Balls are gay.
>'I'm not a homicidal maniac. I only kill fictional people'
Now do futa and traps.
Alright. I want to frick her when she's a big titted southern bimbo
homie a kid isn't just a pint sized human, monster girls talks, behaves and ahs the body language of an adult.
I want to frick her because she can grow a big green monster wiener.
I can relate to that I’ve jerked off to Christina Aguilera and her green hulk strap on more than a couple of times.
I want to frick her because she looks like a child and there is nothing you can do about it.
Nothing huh. We'll see about that.
oh no a gif file
Shit, man. I could say I don't want to frick her and you'd still call me a pedophile.
You're right in that it's essentially a realistic depiction of a 12-year-old, but... some guys are just wired that way to appreciate the shapes and mistake lust for a genuine attraction to children.
It's essentially the same thing as being attracted to seeing a woman getting piped. Your mind is just wired to associate dick with sex, doesn't matter if it's yours.
That said it's still fricking weird and people shouldn't be proud of this attraction. (I mean a large disproportionate amount of content isn't even hetero, it's often men either dominating, emasculating or otherwise fetishizing depictions of little boys so yeah there's clearly something wrong with these people. TBF tho gays have always targeted kids, so it makes sense most pedos are male-on-male.)
>I mean a large disproportionate amount of content isn't even hetero
How do you measure this? I only see e-girl but that's all I'm motivated to see
e-girlbabas are so fascinating because they break people who love to scream pedo at everyone. The default argument against pedos, in fact the default lawmaker logic is based on age. Makes sense since people can look very differently at very different ages. Here come the e-girlbabas. Adults by law but look like children. Can consent by law. They make your lose your mind.
You can't say they can't consent.
You can't argue they don't deserve companionship.
So you try this vague "well if you are attracted to them you are a pedo" while you couldn't even categorize "them" in any way. You couldn't make a rule other than a vague "she looks too young for me". How could you even make sure her potential boyfriends like are not inappropriate? Remember, equality and shit so anything you may come up with should be applied to every woman. Should we go back to the god old times where women are locked up at home and can only meet some men under supervision?
e-girlbaba is such a rare type that it's an edge case but it is also top teir so I dunno what to respond to this other than
>my homie
Why is it wrong to be attracted to an adult that looks like a kid exactly?
pedophilia isn't wrong because people are kink shaming pedos but because it harms children.
Here's a question for you, which is worse dating an adult that looks like a kid or a kid that looks like an adult?
If you read this, you're a peado.
If you don't read this, you a kiddie-fiddler.
uoooooOOOOOOOOOOOOHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh ToT
>its just a drawing shaped like a child, calm down!
Pedophiles are not allowed on Cinemaphile
Only gays
>voiced by Grey
HOW DO YOU EXPECT ME TO NOT GET HARD EVERY FRICKING TIME SHE SPEAKS!?
Everytime I see a clip of this character it's always her screaming about some shit. Nails on chalk ass voice.
>Voiced by Grey Delisle
Oh OK now I see why
Thought crime should be punishable. There's so many secret pedos
You're attracted to a underaged cartoon character you sick frick!
Everybody should only be attracted to of age characters in fiction!
>Everybody should only be attracted to
Everybody should be attracted to LGBTQ and POC!!!!!!!!!!!
Lgbtqp*
Ftfy
Being gay or into minorities is not the same as being attracted to fictional minors
Your right, neither are wrong
>sodomy and miscegenation are good
|
|>
|
Both are more natural than wanting to frick children cartoon characters
I want to frick monster girl into the fricking ground
I don’t really take most e-girlgays seriously because cartoons just don’t look like real people on a fundamental level. I’ll never be walking down the street and see someone who visually resembles a cartoon. So attraction to a cartoon is also fundamentally different from attraction to a real person. You can't claim finding one visually attractive means you have to find the other visually attractive when they visually distinct. And that isn’t even mentioning how morality plays into attraction, since people with empathy won’t want to frick someone if they know they’d hurt them, but since you can’t hurt cartoons there’s none of that empathy based guilt required for it.
Also I haven’t seen the show but OP pic could easily be mistaken for a grown woman. The way she’s drawn doesn’t look that different from how adult characters are usually drawn in that style, another quirk of being cartoons.
I only take it seriously if they make it a point of personality. Like the people with e-girl figures or posters.
I sure enjoy talking about comics and cartoons.
Then leave this thread, hit the hide button, and stop crying like a b***h.
The point is this was a strange moment in the show because she said she doesn’t want to date age appropriate boys but also doesn’t want to date pedos. So the simple joke is that she is effectively undatable by anyone. God you people are dense moralgays. I don’t even watch this show but I walked in on someone watching this scene and I knew le interwebs would have a fit over it
>le interwebs
you were almost believable anon. but you're a pedo moralgay like the rest of us.
all women have the mentality of children therefore they are children. the only people you should frick are men
Pedos and moralgays are in two opposed camps in this thread. Le interwebs is because this kind of thing is prime fodder for moronic pointless discussions all over the internet
>Pedos and moralgays are in two opposed camps in this thread.
dude it's 2 sides of the same coin,
you're on Cinemaphile. and from what i've seen on /misc/ and other boards. pedo's are worse than israelites when it comes to throwing eachother under the bus to get ahead
Ehh maybe. I can see the “THAT’S A 17 YEAR OLD CARTOON CHARACTER YOU SICK FRICK!!” people easily being projecting/coping pedos. Then there’s the unironic dickygays and the “I want a 14 year old tradwife but society tells me no!” people. That last kind is probably the /misc/ contingent. Regardless, these same stupid arguments are occuring on Cinemaphile, resetera, reddit, instagram comments sections in just about the same way. Cinemaphile in particular seems to have a lot of redditors on it
no the moralgays are all people who secretly go in e-girl and shota threads on /b/ or look up hentai with bad excuses like "oh my cursor slipped haha what a total accident"
but their puritan upbringing causes shameful feelings so when they see more open minded people talking about shit openly their brain fries and they become a frothing moron who insists that fantasy = reality and people are commiting mental crimes and need to have their penis dissolved in acid or what the frick ever.
>but also doesn’t want to date pedos
this is completely fair though because pedophiles are sickos who consider children objects of pleasure without considering their feelings. if they had any empathy then there would only be non-offenders.
besides that any pedophile would get tired of her 24 year old bullshit no matter how much of an uoh ToT she is
>objects of pleasure without considering their feelings.
That's how all men think of all women.
and all men are pedos
>all women have the mentality of children
Did she say she really wanted a boyfriend? I don’t pay close attention.
In the comic Amanda was more blatantly desperate for a boyfriend, the show has her more a little more well behaved, in the show she only says in regret how her body issues prevent her from pursuing a relationship with someone as old as she is without the guy being a pedo, and she doesn't want to date a little boy either.
I'd resolve this theoretical issue by just leaving it up to monster girl. Does she wanna frick? Not much more to mull over.
It's very interesting from a sociological standpoint how some people get hung up on this and entirely forget she has agency.
she is a female and a child and this is the US of A
she has no agency period.
she should user her power to deage herself to a fetus and hope she rerolls into a boy.
When the schizo's so malignant you can't even tell what point they're trying to make.
>if you want to frick someone who happens to possess XYZ physical trait, THAT means that XYZ physical trait is your one and only philia
Or maybe sometimes people can like each other for their personalities? Why are you guys so shallow and looks focused?
Fantasizing about consensual sex with someone who looks like a minor is nowhere near as bad as fantasizing about murder, violence, and imprisonment. All these "Anti Pedo" gays are just psychos looking for socially acceptable targets from their sadistic impulses. They're more likely to molest( and torture) children than anyone jerking it to cartoons.
>all this discussion over the "no officer, i swear that she's actually a 1000yr old dragon."
This isn't rocket science, she just said that her situation sucks because she wants to frick but no normal guy would be attracted to her physically. Robot is in the same situation as her but robot is also autistic.
Robot is not in the same situation as her. Robot could have easily aged his clone up to adulthood before placing his consciousness in it, and he would sacrifice nothing. He only chose to be a kid so that Monster Girl would think they are in the same situation, and so that that would make her conclude he is the only possible romantic candidate for her. Not just her ideal choice, her only choice.
>officer
this would be easily solved if monster girl just had her breasts expanded so that she was just a tiny woman instead of a child.
I see so much cartoon porn in various communities where the only thing separating a child from a sexy woman is how big her breasts are.
>give child character huge breasts and pointy ears
>no it's not a child it's a fantasy short creature!
I know that these characters are literally cartoons. But, I think, within their own universe, they don’t perceive themselves as cartoons. So giving her breast implants would result in the awkward situation of her being a little kid body walking around with breast implants, which in the real world would be disturbing.
Also, I’m not sure what that would mean for her transformations. It might just be physically not a viable thing for her to do.
What's with the puriteen infestation on this board?
Cinemaphile has always hated pedos
>Cinemaphile
>having an opinion shared by all anons
You have to go back
Cinemaphile used to have an /l/ board back in the day and e-girl is still allowed on /b/ and [s4s]. It's mostly the vocal Christgays and moralgays whining about it.
You must relate so strongly with monster girl because you're literally 12.
2010 Cinemaphile would give you ptsd.
>replying to a baitpost
back to xitter
>I was just pretending to be moronic
Go back.
We didn’t gatekeep hard enough. Also Cinemaphile is too autistic to identify bait or let arguments go. The correct response to:
>you want to frick a CHILD you fricking PEDO
is either to ignore it or just “Yes”. They have no comeback for that and will seethe that they can’t get a rise out of you. Nobody needs to justify themselves to frothing moralgay morons, especially not anonymous ones on the internet.
She needs a gf instead
Needs to be more /ll/
We all need more /ll/
It’s underrated
Why doesn't she stay a monter and go after women? It's not like there are women not into monsters and she clearly had no problem breeding alien women in the comic so why not stay in her monster form forever?
I assume because she risks the form failing and being turned into a foetus or something
She drops IQ to that of a rampaging baby and also goes godzila size as a result.
eh, can't say she doesn't deserve it
Sauce???
>all this homosexualry ITT
eunf...fricking cheeky little brat board
needs correction
Do you think they’ll keep her underaged sex scene in the show?
I sure love it when people on Cinemaphile are disingenuous and misrepresent arguments to feel smarter than their strawmen.
Morally speaking there is nothing wrong with e-girl, because e-girl is fiction. It isn’t comparable to something like CP. The reason why CP is wrong, is that in order to produce it you have to exploit a child who has not neurologically developed to understand the long term implications of engaging in a sexual relationship. The reason why selling and possessing CP is wrong is that it drives up demand for the market for it
However e-girl does not require exploiting a child to produce, because it is fiction
>b-b-but it can turn people into pedos
If the argument now is “e-girl will make people abuse children in real life” then this is functionally identical to the “violent media makes people violent in real life” argument. You might as well ban all violent media at that point and everything that shows anything icky, which no one wants to do, which makes this point nonsensical
>b-b-but it’s icky!
So? Just because you personally don’t like it doesn’t make it immoral. If there is no evidence it actually causes a societal harm there is no reason to ban it or declare it immoral
intellectual frogposter
>If there is no evidence
I'm still waiting for a fricking study. Imagine the power a politician could weld if they have scientific prove that e-girl cause harm to children.
>b-b-but it can turn people into pedos
Wouldn't that mean gay stuff turns people gay?
Don't bother anon it's just the next worthless crusade for virtue signalling normalgays.
They don't have to actually deal with pedophiles or be one of the poor glowie fricks investigating CP, they just have to cry online about cartoon characters. Same with the "pornography addiction" meme, coomers can be annoying but it has turned into a legitimate crusade to the point that a fricking video game character having breasts and ass causes media controversy not from Fox news but from gaming news and review websites.
All the censorious puritan morons are online now and never leaving, so everything has to be sexless and ass unless it's for trannies and homosexuals.
and neither do you, porn addicted coomer
Yes thanks for repeating my point.
Unlike you I don't engage in worthless normie moralgay causes that only exist for social signalling to others, which ironically is we'd call "masturbatory behavior". Go donate more money to BLM or some shit, you don't care about protecting children or helping dudes legitimately addicted to porn, you're just a homosexual who thinks insults become more cutting with more pseud armchair psychologist terms.
>worthless normie moralgay causes that only exist for social signalling to others
Not even that, since they're anonymous here they don't even gain any clout. All they're doing here is venting their impotent rage for unknown reasons, probably to do with self-hatred since I don't know why else they would do it. They're not going to change anyone's mind or behaviour by screaming and hurling insults.
On one hand, yes, stealing the DNA of Rex to create a body IS a red flag, but his creepyness stops there. Keep in mind that he has spent 30+ years in a fricking water tank and had zero social interactions.
Nah, there are other red flags. He is trying very hard (whether he realizes it or not) to groom Monster Girl and usher her into a relationship where she is dependent on him. He’s just luckily bad at it.
Not true he had social interactions with the teen team. Not directly but through his drones.
>OP: I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY GIRLS WON'T TALK TO ME!
Must suck for you. My wife talks to be everyday.
You've outed yourself as a tourist.
you're going to have to learn to accept that women would rather die alone than date a man they consider beneath them
Men are the same way Anon, that’s a human trait.
Men will even frick a corpse.
Someone hasn’t watched Clerks.
>Twilight.
You wanna know why men are more desperate?
Why men are more horny?
Why women are more pleasing to look at and get more attention?
Why single men are losers compared to single women?
because eggs are valuable and sperm is cheap.
simple as that.
So you’re saying women without eggs are worth less than men.
Not that anon but from a biological darwinist perspective, yes. They would be the textbook definition of a genetic dead-end.
social Darwinist*
>eggless women are worth less than men
yes, but all women naturally have eggs unless they're 60+ years old.
Newsflash, anon. Women do that shit too. Such as the woman who gave birth to a corpse's child.
Women are just as freaky and fricked up as men. They just get away with it more and hide it better because they're more valuable to society and it's in them to be discreet, and no one looks at them as innate perpetrators of such things. They are not the fairer sex, they are no better than men, and everyone is a freak when the lights are off and they are alone, in one way or another.
Me, I like shemales.
>Women do that shit too.
Not nearly as much as men. And I'm talking hundreds of times less. Don't even try this cope spiel. Women are nothing like men and never will be, and the crime stats are definitive proof.
There's a recent study proving women a re even more psychopathic as men, and historical bias in favor of women and leniency for the same crime stands in favor of them getting away with, or even never being held accountable of, similar crimes and atrocities. They wouldn't even be considered as perpetrators as a result of societal bias.
>more cope
Men take up 99% of space in prisons.
if i white knight this woman and say she dindu nuffin maybe she'll frick me
Women frick kids and don't get sent to prison. They get to keep their licenses.
Mothers murder their children far more yet still get custody an overwhelming percentage of the time. They get written off as postpartum depression victims.
Women rob and defraud men's sperm or rape them when their children and then get to sue the male when he is grown for child support.
>Women frick kids and don't get sent to prison. They get to keep their licenses.
don't forget that the kid ends up having to pay child support
Yup, can't forget that one.
that sounds like bullshit
allegedly it's happened but i cant find any immediate or credible news sources
All it took was a google search dude
>Arizona Is Requiring A Male Statutory Rape Victim To Pay Child Support
> A 24-year-old man who impregnated a 20-year-old woman when he was 14 is being forced by the state of Arizona to pay $15,000 in back child support and medical bills, in addition to 10% interest — even though he was the victim of statutory rape and never even knew he had a child until two years ago, azcentral.com reports.
They can also put your name on a birth certificate and never tell you about it, too. You don't even need to be the biological dad but the state will still hold you accountable for the child. Not her, and you can't go after her for damages.
meant for
Based justice system frick men and frick men
So true xesister
Let's all 41% ourselves
>Olivas' case is not the first of its kind. The Kansas Supreme Court ruled unanimously in 1993 that 13-year-old Shane Seyer who impregnated his 17-year-old babysitter Colleen Hermesmann was responsible for paying child support even though he was under 16, the age of sexual consent.
Fear is a b***h. Fear of performance, fear of lack of performance, fear of reprisal, fear of consequence of saying no. Point is, legally speaking, he couldn't consent. Legally speaking, she should have been held responsible as a man would have. Not only was she not, she got to admit to raping a child and was monetarily rewarded for it by the state while being exonerated for something that would have landed a man who did the exact same thing as her in jail, prison, or a casket.
This just proves red states need to be burned to the ground
Their morals are only one way, rife with double standards and hypocrisy, and lazily enforced. That's all I got to say on that.
See this is why I'm ok with vigilantly justice.
Wait, can't 13 yr olds frick 17 yr olds because of the 4 year age gap and both being under 18?
I know states have different rape laws, how does it work in Kansas?
And this is where muh aoc law is 13 in japan memes fall apart.
If she was 16, it would be different but she's 17 so its rape but shes not 18 (adult) but shes still a wahman
>Women frick kids and don't get sent to prison.
Not true.
>Mothers murder their children far more
Not true again.
>Women rob and defraud men's sperm or rape them
Three for three, all wrong.
99%. The numbers are indisputable.
So the stories of female teachers not getting sent to prison for fricking their underage male students don't exist?
The statistics of single mothers being prone to abuse, endanger the lives of their children, and end them statistically far higher than fathers don't exist?
The instances of women spermjacking men just... never happened? Is that right?
post sources
post proof
homosexual
>So the stories of female teachers not getting sent to prison for fricking their underage male students don't exist?
A customary search reveals a ton of stories of them getting sent to prison for it and chants of NICE in the comments of every such article.
>The statistics of single mothers being prone to abuse, endanger the lives of their children, and end them statistically far higher than fathers don't exist?
Instances exist but are a drop in the bucket compared to men perpetuating the same thing.
>The instances of women spermjacking men just... never happened? Is that right?
There are next to none of them, correct.
>Women rob and defraud men's sperm or rape them
>Three for three, all wrong.
This shit never happened, I guess. Family courts hold women just as accountable and responsible as men.
psychologytoday com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-child-support
And there is not and never has been a distinct and glaring difference in punishment for the same crimes commited by both men and wome, in favor of leniency for women?
i.imgur com/vheEP64 jpg
Eat a hot bag of dicks.
The point was never ' a drop in the bucket' so don't move that goalpost. The point was that women receive far more leniency but still are capable of doing the same things as men. Once more:
>no one looks at them as innate perpetrators of such things. They are not the fairer sex, they are no better than men, and everyone is a freak when the lights are off and they are alone, in one way or another.
Difference is, women get away with it.
>The point was never ' a drop in the bucket' so don't move that goalpost
Yes, it was. 99% isn't 100%.
I clearly stated my point. I never deviated from it. If you want to literally lie when my post is right there, you're a fool.
I also stated my point.
99%. Read it and weep.
Your point has been nothing but shifting and moving of the goalpost. That's all the time I'm giving to this conversation though.
The 99% goalpost has never shifted. You've been coping and moping this entire time, but men still make up the overwhelming majority of criminals and sex offenders in the whole wide world.
They also make up the majority of victims of those crimes
Once again the point was never about who does it more, it has been that women do it as well but receive lesser punishment. You're an illiterate jackass lying out of your ass right now, and all it takes is reading of my posts to prove it. Go frick yourself.
>Once again the point was never about who does it more
Wrong.
>women do it as well but receive lesser punishment
Also wrong.
>Wrong.
Factually correct and provably so.
>Also wrong.
Statstically, factually, and easily proven correct.
Good day.
>Factually correct and provably so.
Maybe in your dreams.
>G-Good day good day good day I'm ending the argument AGAIN now it's over I winned!
KEK
He did win, you lost. There's no point in him arguing because now you're just coping and denying reality
>He
You really thought this was going to work? What a moron you are.
>inb4 edits the (You)s out with inspect element
Ask a troony jannie to ban me then moron, he'll still keep posting.
>>G-Good day good day good day I'm ending the argument AGAIN now it's over I winned!
you've been doing this same thing throughout that entire argument lol
You must have seen it in the same place you're using to get your statistics (your deluded mind).
>anyone disagreeing with me is the same person
Literal mental moronation.
>no ip counter
this entire thread is one big samegay
Sorry, I forgot to put a picture with this post when I made it.
>don't you see I used lowercase? completely different guy
It's not wrong, you are.
You "people" aka NEETs really need to go outside and stop listening to California's news.
Women are not valuable in eastern europe+islam, they're slaves. Men there would rather frick a goat and would rather go homosexual than frick their women.
And if you're ugly as shit/have shit genes nobody will want your children, neither to frick you.
Stop listening to feminist Californian propaganda. It makes me sick.
Men will always be the more desperate side. That's why women have so much power over men.
Not when they're actually in charge and can properly control pussy as a resource
Brother name me one country where women have actual power over women
Men* I'm sleepy
Cute
gays
Men get tired
gays and children say sleepy
why is it that when an older woman is single, nobody bats an eye.
but when an older man is single, people shit on him?
Because the man has value to exploit that isn't being exploited, and the woman doesn't
I don't know if you've noticed, but a straight man's entire existence is based around his ability to procure the interest of and have sex with women.
Grown women aren't attracted to pedophiles surprisingly, Anon. It's not a very appealing trait in a person.
I don't get people in thread saying "fricking her" when in reality she is the one doing the fricking with her giant monster wiener, she wrecks Robot ass
It is canon she has a giant monster wiener.
she impregnated a alien with her seed in comics and made a child
kinda like nowadays Mystique/Destiny situation with Nightcrawler
They did the body stealing thing too early. So Rudy comes off as a super controlling creep trying to groom an adult woman trapped in a cursed body instead of "honoring" a comrade who fell in the war.
>. So Rudy comes off as a super controlling creep
To moronic women who have been taught to hate males yeah, to normal people he's just an awkward loner who has trouble connecting with people
>monstergirl is cursed to become younger by an amount everytime she becomes a monster
>monster is male with functioning reproductive organs
>she becomes monster until her human form is that of a little girl
>she complains that she is only found attractive by pedophiles in her human form
>she is fine with having sex while in monster form
I think monstergirl is just a in denial she finds it more convenient to just have sex while she's a man instead of being a female despite the curse of becoming younger in the process.
> She's more willing to make herself younger if it means she can have sex with someone that's not a pedophile.
How many troons are here today?
41
not me, i'm just a femme sissy homosexual
I don't even get why they're "dating", she seems to hate Robot's fricking guts. Must really be because he looks like the brown guy she likes.
I know what they're trying to set up with this subplot but I can't help but feel sorry for him. The boy just has autism, have mercy white girl
Did the comic confirm if Monster Girl's Ogre/Flaxan son lost his mom from Robot's assassins or if it was from the Flaxan princess birthing a monster half-breed?
I believe there's been a big misunderstanding going on. If you've actually done your research or been here long enough to notice it, the supposed children everyone keeps harping on about don't act like children, they act like ADULTS cosplaying as underaged boys/girls. Now here's the kicker. Being attracted to women, you'd obviously be attracted to their figure, which includes nudity and other inclinations that have sexual undertones. Naturally this is applicable to literally anything (make a non-living object speak sassy, it gets men wild). To summarize, e-girlcons/shotacons are not necessarily attracted to pic.
But would be attracted to something like pic. It bears a large correlation to brat/rowdy correction as well since they make them act like already sexually maturing people.
NTA
But I'm attracted to scrunchies and bracelets. It's not my fault most art with them in it features teenish chicks.
THAT'S the reason why it's attractive to you? Not because she's dressed sexually provocative?
Joke's on you I find modest ingenues attractive too.
>If you've actually done your research or been here long enough to notice it, the supposed children everyone keeps harping on about don't act like children, they act like ADULTS cosplaying as underaged boys/girls
THANK YOU. I keep telling this people. Most of the characters people tend to like here have adult personalities and people don't even notice it. The e-girl brat is basically nonexistent in real life because their entire personality is built around the perfect understanding of the sexual dynamics and confidence young people simply don't have in the presence of adults.
These characters are indeed adults cosplaying as kids. The majority of uooohh! userbase here likes some impossible idealized version of a horny teen. They would never think about fricking actual girls at that age because they are damn annoying and have none of the charm of cartoon girls.
>Bro, its just normal to want to frick that girl with the 12 yo build, she acts like an adult bro. Look at the lack of hips and breasts, doesnt that get you hard bro?
Define 12 yo build. There are 20 years old women with no hips and breasts. That is why the lawmaker ties consent to age which is incompatible with
>it looks 12 years old for me bro
There are 20+ years old women right now who make a bank with nudity on the internet because they look underage. You can't do anything with a e-girlbaba, she is not prepubescent, she not a child she just looks in a way that makes YOU uncomfortable. She is not different from a deformed person.
what kind of e-girlbaba are we talking about? lecherous old bumpkin, dutiful grandma, high class socialite, warrior sage, fae like innocence but with a deep memory and incredible power, primitive cave woman somehow stuck in the paleolithic? I'm gonna need answers here.
This theory isn't completely unreasonable, but then I need an explanation on where the attraction comes from specifically. It can't be the bratty-ness alone because adult drawn bratty characters aren't what they like. It can't be a specific art styles because a wide range of styles still make them horny.
Why specifically depictions of children who are into sex/act sexually proactive? I'm not saying most people into e-girl stuff would really go after actual children (hell most 'actual' pedophiles dont ever go that far), but It's a hard to buy that they aren't actually sexually allured by irl young girl bodies when everything about the art they consume for pornographic self indulgent reasons is hyper focused on the particulars of prepubescent -> pubescent bodies.
If hypothetically there was some 12 yr old girl who spent a lot of time on Newgrounds when she was a child and made video's acting sexually proactive and bratty, would that not be material these people would be into watching? NOTE: I'm not even asking if they would pursue her irl, but that indulging in irl bratty girl video's sounds like something they would interested in based on the framework you've laid out.
(This is all of course ignoring that for the majority of e-girl-history, e-girl's were in fact NOT bratty but rather actual attempts at depicting cute young girls but just for arguments sake I'll operate under the assertions you've made.)
Personally, I just think that a larger than society would like to admit percentage of people are naturally into extremely young girls. Looking at the majority of history, sexually imposing on young girls has been somewhat common.
can she partially transform her body parts?
Like say...transform her pussy into a giant green wiener?
how tight is her pussy tho?
Never drawn her before and I'd like to give it a shot. What kind of lewd to do?
Not going anything with stupid raisins shit.
POV of her stepping on the viewer's face while naked.
Accidentally flashing everyone because she forgot she tore through her clothes after transforming.
Have her dominate Anissa
Her grinding on anon while he screams she's legal.
Literally
L-i-t-e-r-a-l-l-y
The only guy she can sleep with
She can't be with adult men because that adult guy would be a pedophile
She can't be with children even tho she looks like a kid because then she is the pedophile
>She can't be with adult men because that adult guy would be a pedophile
Never stopped men before.
But enough about yourself.
She's with Rudy, who's only a few days old, so she is in fact a pedo anyway.
Does anyone here actually watch this fricking show?
I do. No hobby is sage from tourists though
You misunderstand Cinemaphile, anon, this is a thread for disingenuous "anti-pedo" trolls to cast bait and autistic people to fruitlessly attempt to argue in good faith with them until bump limit. There'll be another thread just like it tomorrow, you'll catch on eventually.
just like how Cinemaphileirgins don't play games, Cinemaphileomers don't watch cartoons.
Wrong they don’t read comics, watching cartoons is easy. Also porn comics don’t count out your hand down and take your other hand out of your pants.
>she cheated on robot but spends the rest of the book blaming him for what she did
Realistic female behavior.
So Levy, was a good guy and Mark deserved everything. Wtf?
her "curse" is literally a blessing, idk i am jealous and would not be wasting such a gift
This is not the Molly McGee thread
well, lots of other people are posting pics of various medias to represent themselves in this very thread, and i like andrea davenport from molly mcgee cause i think she is cool
and my post is relevant because monster girl has a gift of de-aging, i wish i could have it too
>she
She wants a boyfriend, not a doctor. Besides literally all of one movie date, Rudy's interaction with her has just revolved around her aging issue. She literally tells him that they can/should talk about other shit besides her problem.
The root of the issue is she doesn't believe he can really do it, so it's offensive to hear him say he can
>She wants a boyfriend, not a doctor
Dammit, Jim!
Not a pedo, sorry to barge in, how come she has child body but can drink beer and shit? Should she not be dumb like a kid with small undeveloped brain get sleepy early and stuff?
She's cursed so maybe the ogre durability syncs somewhat with her human form too. That or Invincible humans are just more durable. I mean Mark's mom got her arm nearly torn off and didn't die of shock.
Oh god, she looks like a Tekuho character from a distance
Azula voiced this girl. So I just assume she's a bratty Azula ToT
>stop being attracted to the average age of sex+having kids your species acclimated to thousands of years
>incels think lowering the age of consent will help then get a gf when it just means chad gets more pussy
School and TV lied to you
>I want a GF so bad
>NOOOO I DON'T WANT A SUPERFICIAL prostitute WHO ONLY LIKES ME FOR MY TANGIBLE ASSETS
You must be literally autistic to not be able to emphasize with this. Everyone wants to be with someone who makes them feel special.
>emphasize
back to english class
it's empathize you room temp iq homosexual.
I like how she started crushing on Rex and Rex was totally eye-banging her.
>"You're attracted to a flat short character or person because you are a pedophile"
>"Actually it's an adult with those features, or a drawing, and therefore not pedophilia by definition"
>"Well I don't agree with your preferences so I'll threaten to kill you"
>>"Actually it's an adult with those features, or a drawing, and therefore not pedophilia by definition"
honestly, if it's a physical adult deformed to look like a child. I'll take it. enjoy your sick pedo fantasies on someone who cant consent to and understand the things you want to do with them,
unfortunately most pedos don't want adults who look like children because the mental incapability is what allows them to get close in the first place
can consent to*
typo
This is just the same thing people were saying in the 1950's about gays and wanted to hang them or have them put in an asylum for it.
they weren't wrong though
And they were right then, too.
That's justified.
>Cinemaphile - Comics & Cartoons
Discourse involving fictional e-girls in current year are AIDS yes
you guys are just jealous that no woman ever raped you
I was. Wouldn't recommend it
what are you, gay?
she was very fat while I was drunk and too weak and disoriented to properly fight her off. Shit hurt and I was sore for like 2 weeks. I nutted but it wasn't enjoyable in any way. In hindsight I should have just pissed or vomited or something
>she was very fat
When I see Monster Girl I always think of Camp Sherwood
I dont care what drawings people jerk off to but I still think e-girlgays are disgusting and obnoxious
Argue about morality all you want but being into e-girl should never be normalized or something to be proud of
>jerking off to cartoons should never be normalized or something to be proud of
Hardcore e-girl x shota rape snuff to Frankie lewds are in the same bucket for me.
>i'm fricked up so everyone else is
>no bro, jerking off to cartoons is normal if they're above age
Buy a mirror anon.
Why? I dont want to jerk off to my JWG body.i want to jerk off to sexy cartoon people
Does that count as gay? If you jerk off to yourself? Would that count as pedophilia if you jerk off to baby pictures of yourself? Or does the narcissism override both? This is entirely separate from the thread discussion.
I quite literally don't care about the morality of e-girl drawings
I wish she had more fan art of her monster form thoughevertheless
God just rape her.
Also kind of hate how they've translated her x rudy it's so much gayer and depressing. Like now I can see the cucking a million miles away compared to the comic where it was more wholesome and very background.
Imagine her monster pussy
>he doesn't know.
Monster Girl has the perfect life:
Screw around being a powerful Superhuman til she reaches her current apparent age: Retire.
Go study, travel, learn new languages, martial-arts, cash-in on long-term investments for 10-20 years.
Resume super-adventuring, til kid again.
Repeat Forever.
And if she's ever in danger, she just turns into the Hulk for a moment.
The average dicky seether has this kind of mindset btw
Anon needs to see a therapist.
He's not wrong though.
I think e-girlcons are homosexuals but anyone who unironically uses incel on Cinemaphile should 41% themselves
Ok incel
So true
As in all incel fashion I'm going to transition
i'll never understand trying to preach against the other side of the same coin you're standing on
>tfw into /ss/ and don't self insert at all
I just like seeing cute boys be with cute/hot women I dunno why it always turns into some weird argument about who is who.
He…does realise that female pedophiles exist, right? And that many shotacon artists and commissioners are women? /ss/ isn’t an inherently male fetish.
>tfw will never have an /ss/ maestro like vee again
the way she made her boys so soft was great, you hardly ever see that with male artists who often self insert.
sauce on vee? who was she?
>he doesn't know
answer me
She should just make the effort to develop a e-girl fetish (she wishes to be the little girl)
She clearly already has one since she won't stop deaging herself even when alternatives exist.
Why doesn't she just stop using her powers if she wants a normal relationship?
Because she has a responsibility, dumbass
With great power comes great responsibility
With no power comes no responsibility
takes too much discipline and she's kind of a shithead. Given her backstory it's kind of surprising she's not a villain
Brat needs correction..
Surprised their isn't more art of her, she's literally one of the few if any american e-girlbabas/legal e-girls
Shes just an uglier timantha
If you like women you like complaining, simple as.
Go gay if you dont like b***hes b***hing.
>go gay
>bitches b***h about me being gay
Post physique with timestamp
Any other reply to this is proof you're a troony
homosexual
Seething incel is seething
What do you get out of this, anon? Why are you here? Have you really nothing better to do? If not that's very sad.
Take your pills Alice
Its S A MAN tha
even without the ip counter I can tell it’s the same 10 twittergays circle jerking each other for internet points, feds check the hard drives of those anons they are hiding something
Oh no not my fricking drawings!
Incels won't admit their genes aren't worth passing down
14, anon. He was 14.
>14 year old boy couldn't beat off a 20 year old woman
How weak was he?
this whole amazon adaption
Looks like a boy
Fugging Robin's are cuter than (she) is
>6 invincible threads up right now
>one is currently having a breakdown over a fotw not generating as much porn as they wanted
>the other is a very poor attempt at circlejerking around a character that they very clearly just care about because of a scene where she almost dies inside of a psycho Black person
>this one was made just to call another character a b***h but somehow escalated to pseudo-psychoanalists calling each other "pedophiles"
>post count in the remaining three threads that are actually discussing the finale don't go over the two digits
i fricking hate you homosexuals
This is the world you chose to endorse when you posted in this thread anon.
>And this is where muh aoc law is 13 in japan memes fall apart.
I don't follow.
Looks like somebody called the wambulance. Quick, get some cheese for this wine before a river is made.
https://files.catbox.moe/fxvhqi.jpg
Lil wip. I'll tweak it and finish it later
Great job so far anon, I like the attitude and that she's lifting her shirt. Respect for drawing the hands. I have big issues with them.
Yeah, hands can be tricky for me too, even more cause i draw on 8×3cm sheets, but that goes for most little details, tummies are a bigger priority, honestly
Who is peak C-word?
Pic related.
digits confrm
You know, this might as well be the thread for a blog post
>currently in a long term relationship with one of these perpetually baby faced, sub 1.5m women
>besides her youngish looks, she also has this jovial personality
>everybody that meets her clocks her at 18 if they are generous, 15 if not (turns 30 this year)
>Have coworkers joke about having to be careful with the police when we go out
I'm not even into e-girl[spoiler]
>I'm not even into e-girl[spoiler]
What a waste.
She once had to work in the same company I do, my boss literally showed her the place while holding her hand like you would a little kid
Happened again a few days ago with an not that old lady from work
Thanks for sharing that, anon
pics or you're delusional
Robot is a gigantic piece of shit and was from day fricking one, why are you shitting on her for having good judgement.
They're not even talking about robot
>person is denied the ability to have a relationship
>despite being an adult capable of making her own choices
>entirely due to how she looks like, a condition which she didnt choose to have
She can literally choose to not user her powers tho.
except for all those times when not using her powers would mean she or someone else could die
and in any case, that shouldnt matter
someone should have a right to live a normal life if they choose to do so
except she's using her powers for dumb shit like training
>training
>dumb
and again, the ability to have a relationship is an intrinsic right
it's not a right, actually
>therefore the government has legal ability to cut you off from your friends if they should choose to
it's called prison
monster girl hasnt actually done anything wrong
so she shouldnt be given worse treatment for whats effectively no reason
she can't get a relationship because of her personal choices
nobody's forcing her to do shit
>she can't get a relationship because of her personal choices
and thats not fair either
>nobody's forcing her to do shit
and she hasnt done anything wrong
she is totally justified in being frustrated over her condition
>and thats not fair either
it's absolutely fair you moron, you're not entitled to a government issued husband
she also refuses all alternatives from robot like a moron
>you're not entitled to a government issued husband
she isnt
but she is entitled to have a fair shake at it
good thing she has one then
She can just choose to not use powers to save other people and let yourself age up if she wants a normal life.
All of her problems are unironically her own fault.
the presence or absence of powers, which do not alter her ability to give consent, should not deprive someone of their right to a normal life
what a fun thread
whats your top (western) e-girl artists
personally, i appreciate the works of
andava, jjfrenchie and tekuho
do you mean western artists or artists of western e-girls
>*opens baraag*
andava's brother, ponpu, garabatoz, pokachu, mrscrambled, aaaninja, and nebukhanezzar to name a few.
If 3D counts, that's a whole other list.
name some 3d ones then
uncaged, irispolar, superweb, red_l, and frickheadmanip to name a few
>3d
Thats pedo
3dPeDo
garabatoz, panzer, diathorn
Why is this thread still going?
Why do you think?
The black guy with portals storyline didn't really go anywhere did it.
I'm starting to think I don't like this show
Funny thing is this applies exactly to trannies too.
And midgets and fatties and homely women and femboys and etc
If you are any deviation from the norm, people are probably fetishizing you.
Hell even if you are 'normal'. Le tradwife le tradhusband
>Just because I'm sexually attracted to fictional children does not mean I find children sexually attractive, I just get hard on the idea to frick a non-developed body without secondary sexual characteristic that children just happen to have.
Its always wierd how defensive pedophiles get over being labeled a pedophile
this b***h doesn't use a plate when making a sandwich...
https://files.catbox.moe/od5lj0.jpg
Finished just in time
She could have a normal life at any time she chooses - these frustrations are of her own making.
All she'd have to do is quit using her power and allow her body to age, eventually she'd be able to form a healthy relationship and maybe even raise a family, but she absolutely refuses to quit the superheroism gig and to be a superhero she needs to lean on her superpower.
And so, she continues to wallow in the existential morass she place herself in.