People will talk again when the Switch port drops and it runs like shit
That said, it's a mid game. Character interactions are boring, it doesn't feel much like you are "living" hogwarts at all, just following some boring story with the usual open world slop and RPG elements every soulless AAA game have now
>when the Switch port drops
Fricking lmao, it's still not out? Wasn't it delayed 5 months after the launch, and it STILL isn't out and seemingly has no release date? Kek
Not only was the game mostly trash, but imagine playing it ln the switch as well
A bunch of the later movies don't hold up. Bad acting, bad romantic chemistry between actors, we barely get any actual character building, these movies haven't aged well.
>the episode where Hagrid caught the first years using polyjuice potions to look older and blackmail the older kids by having sex with them and then threatening them with statutory rape accusations >the episode where Dumbledore was informed that a date rape epidemic had broken out because the widespread availability of love potions but brushed it under the rug to avoid having to tell the ministry >the episode where Harry Potter was ill for a week and Dumbledore took it out on everyone by only letting them eat porridge and toast >the episode where a first year went missing after sneaking into the forbidden forest and Dumbledore smudged his records to make it look like he never attended Hogwarts >the episode where the kids were clearly all drunk off butterbeer that Hagrid had given them and none of the teachers reported it >the episode where Mrs McGonnegal found out that the kids had been using the room of requirement to get back-alley abortions >the episode where Fred and George laced the water supply with polyjuice potion to make everyone look like Snape
How about that episode where JK Rowling writes the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
a lot of women do
You are a woman.
>I can get Cinemaphile to validate me by saying I watch Harry Potter
Screencapped, my sisters need to hear about this!
>You can get validation from Cinemaphile
>But only if you say you like Harry Potter
This kills the troon.
When did tv start hating trans folk? Is this a /misc/ psyop?
Hermoinie sex
Hermione IS sex.
>Hermione IS sex.
Yep
She shows her legs and puts on some heels and anons are already forgiving her. But no. She still needs to apologize.
>She still needs to apologize.
https://voca.ro/17626uZyxpU9
>And when I first got into the backseat for a little... um... you know...
What did she mean by this?
Has she apologized yet?
>Radcliffe has a kid
>Grint has a kid
>Rowling has multiple kids
>Emma has...
Oh no no no Emma bros!
>Oh no no no Emma bros!
She has her brother, and a bottle of Gin.
>Taking your childless spinster sister on a date so that she can have at least one night where she doesn't cry herself to sleep
What a good brother.
veganal oral or anal?
What sex position?
All of them.
Anal only
Are you a kid or a millennial woman
>nobody even mentions Hogwart's Legacy after the release
People will talk again when the Switch port drops and it runs like shit
That said, it's a mid game. Character interactions are boring, it doesn't feel much like you are "living" hogwarts at all, just following some boring story with the usual open world slop and RPG elements every soulless AAA game have now
How moddable is it?
>How moddable is it?
On the pc? clothing mods, face mods and reshades.
>when the Switch port drops
Fricking lmao, it's still not out? Wasn't it delayed 5 months after the launch, and it STILL isn't out and seemingly has no release date? Kek
Not only was the game mostly trash, but imagine playing it ln the switch as well
I have never seen any of the movies.
Gms
the first 2 are the only ones worth watching, comfykino directed by Chris Columbus
A bunch of the later movies don't hold up. Bad acting, bad romantic chemistry between actors, we barely get any actual character building, these movies haven't aged well.
>the episode where Hagrid caught the first years using polyjuice potions to look older and blackmail the older kids by having sex with them and then threatening them with statutory rape accusations
>the episode where Dumbledore was informed that a date rape epidemic had broken out because the widespread availability of love potions but brushed it under the rug to avoid having to tell the ministry
>the episode where Harry Potter was ill for a week and Dumbledore took it out on everyone by only letting them eat porridge and toast
>the episode where a first year went missing after sneaking into the forbidden forest and Dumbledore smudged his records to make it look like he never attended Hogwarts
>the episode where the kids were clearly all drunk off butterbeer that Hagrid had given them and none of the teachers reported it
>the episode where Mrs McGonnegal found out that the kids had been using the room of requirement to get back-alley abortions
>the episode where Fred and George laced the water supply with polyjuice potion to make everyone look like Snape
How about that episode where JK Rowling writes the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
>How about that episode
Are you from the future? Hows the show?
>Emma is naked behind that curtain
HNNNNG!!!
Just play the game.