I watched Dracula 1992 by Copolla and it was one of the most SOVFUL films I have ever seen.

I watched Dracula 1992 by Copolla and it was one of the most SOVFUL films I have ever seen. Why doesnt this film get talked about more? The only bad thing about this film is Keanu Reeves being cast instead of Johny Depp

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    sorry sweaty, but Vampire: The Masquerade: Bloodlines did it far better...

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    damn imagine Depp in that role instead
    wouldve been so much better

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Almost any competent English guy would have been better. Cary Elwes as Keanu Reeves' character would have been perfect

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You stated the reason: the lead (Reeves) was a major miscast. Other than that, the film is superb

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ese no es un problema cuando la vez doblada.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >movie titled Dracula
      >Dracula is not the lead
      what are you on about?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Movie is called Dr. No
        >Dr. No isn't the lead
        >Movie is called The Great Gatsby
        >The Great Gatsby isn't the lead
        >Movie is called Waiting For Guffman
        >Guffman isn't the lead
        >Movie is called A Fish Called Wanda
        >The fish isn't the lead
        What a fricked up world we live in

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the internet is broken

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Movie called Jurassic Park
        >No Dinosaur lead

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That’s why JP3 is the best of the franchise because the main character is the Spinosaurus

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >movie titled Jaws
        >Dracula is not the lead

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Movie called Count of Monte Cristo (2002)
        >Henry Cavill is not the lead.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Movie called Count of Monte Cristo

          >There are no sandwiches anywhere in the movie

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >mfw when no sandwiches.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            so the Count of Monte Cristos is zero

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous
            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              So how many is Count Chocula?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        is not the lead in the book either

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The real redpill is that Keanu was well cast because Jonathan Harker has always been the most boring character in the story. Going with an actor with lesser skill was a smart decision.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, frick the story up even worse than it already was, excellent work Francis

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      so he was overrated even back then?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No one ever thought he was a good actor, he just has an X-factor that makes him suitable for certain roles.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I loved Vlad's armour

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Queer

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Looks like a fricking crab

        trannies leave

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Looks like a fricking crab

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Is it meant to look like flesh?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is what Roose Bolton should have looked like

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      always thought it was a neat design
      shame there weren't more scenes set in the past

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      always thought it was a neat design
      shame there weren't more scenes set in the past

      I love the movie but that looks dumb as hell, you guys are moronic.
      He looks like a cross between meat man and a bionicle

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        bonkles are kino

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      always thought it was a neat design
      shame there weren't more scenes set in the past

      honorary samurai

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    JN should have been cast in place of keanu

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's so fricking good dude. i got to watch it in hd at the kinoplex for the recent anniversary. what a movie experience.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why doesnt this film get talked about more?
    Because Cinemaphile doesn't care about good movies

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I like Oldman but he just seemed wrong for the part.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I feel that way about Sir Anthony Hopkins as Van Hellsing

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Hopkins pure Lectre mode as Van Helsing.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is better. Johnny Rico teams up with pipe hittin homies & a israelite hating Van Helsing against master vamps.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    in terms of pure filmmaking craft it's a 10/10

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes in one way it's a a complete marvel. However, in a bizarre homage to most silent movies, it shits all over its source material in a way that's not beneficial. The ending where Drac gets the girl but he's good now doesn't work for me, as there's earned no redemption arc.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >there's earned no redemption arc.

        >Dracula
        >Kills a shit ton of people
        >Seduces Mina and Lucy
        >Dies and goes to heaven

        >Lucy
        >Gets seduced by Dracula and has wolf sex with him
        >Van Helsing and the bros put a stake through her heart
        >She dies and goes straight to the bottom ring of hell

        BASED

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the scene in the dinner was masterful, or at least it moved me deeply.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just realized I've been enjoying this thread but didn't yet reward OP with any bumps.

    Love this kino flick. Especially the scene in the kino.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it gets discussed frequently enough. either you're a shitposter that spends too much time in bait threads or youve been here for like a day

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Campkino of the highest order legitimately one of the prettiest films ever made.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I just watched this for the first time last month. Probably one of the best looking films ever

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >wow! those bodacious women are sucking my blood! rad!

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This movie is pure fricking dogshit. It's the worst Dracula movie by a longshot for the mere reason it pretends to be a proper adaptation of the novel, yet almost 60% of the movie is made up romantic drama gayshit presenting Dracula as some sympathetic b***hboy and it turns Mina Harker into an irredeemable cheating bawd. Still the only attempt to adapt the novel that includes Quincy Morris, the guy who actually kills fricking Dracula, so I guess it barely counts for something.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You’re right. Everyone points out Reeve but Oldman just as bad. His Count was so over the top makes think trying to compete with Nicholson’s Joker.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I think he did a pretty good job, but then again I liked Nicholson as the Joker too

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dracula isn't sympathetic per se, but he was always a ladies man.

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I tried to watch this last night but the free stream version was too quiet and I didn't want to put earbuds in so I watched The Other Side of the Wind instead and it was kino. Thank you for reading my blog.

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what would he have thought about it?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >not enough stakes

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Hated it. He didn’t give a frick about the wife that jumped out window. He had
      many wives. Rob Pattinson related to
      him.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >ding ding ding

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      5/10, not daring enough and didn't raise enough stakes

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why doesnt this film get talked about more?

    It gets talked about a lot. It's literally the most discussed Dracula adaptation and any goth chick loves it.

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Kill roaches invading your land and raping your women
    >israelites make you out to be a literal monster
    checks out especially in ~~*current year*~~

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're reading too far into it. Also, the original novel has a conservative bent to it.
      Dracula was the scary foreigner.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      His ways were definitely monstrous, even if I agree that his retribution was justified.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      His intention was to spook away the roaches and assert monstrous dominance

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *