>Incredible performances
>Perfect directing; the Raimi quirks weren't cliches yet
>Lots of practical effects because CGI hadn't become a crutch for the industry yet
>Romance isn't forced or campy
It's the best Spider-Man film ever made
I would dare say it's as good as the first Donner Superman.
Based anon, its also dark as frick when it needs to be. Its peak SOUL
Donner Superman is heavily overrated.
But I agree otherwise.
>no web shooters
dropped
makes him more of a superhero in my opinion, one of the better changes
Spiders spin webs out of glands on their abdomens, not on their feet.
The biological web shooters make no sense that way, and Peter making the mechanical ones is supposed to demonstrate his smarts and STEM ability. The first movie lacks anything like that
How does he stick to walls? Does he have tiny terrifying claws on his fingertips like in the movie?
No, in the comics is some sub-atomic electromagnetic bullshit, so he can adhere to any surface.
bio-spiderman shoots webs out his wrist because comic spidderman does it and because it's fricking stupid if spooderman shot web out his butt.
Spiders don't have six packs, either, genius.
Bruh what the frick are you talking about.
Peter being able to stick to walls and climb them through fricking gloves and shoes makes no sense. The spider sense makes no sense.
It's fantasy super hero shit the super powers don't need to make sense that's the super hero part.
The shit that does matter is the stuff supposed to be grounded in a form of reality, and what makes no sense in that department is how Peter developed, consistently creates, has/builds containers, transports, and stores web fluid.
I didn't know Spiderman had gay little gizmos that shot his web for him, so I thought it made a lot of sense when the genetic engineering spider makes him a spider-manos
That's because there's not actually anything specifically "spider" about Peter's powers. Spiders DO NOT have any kind of preternatural sense of danger, at least not anymore than any other bug that can smell with their antennas or whatever.
He could've just as easily been any other kind of bug that isn't already taken, or a lizard or anything else that can climb walls. And basically all animals of all kinds are proportionally much stronger than humans so that's not much of a spider-specific thing either.
Web shooters are fricking stupid and always will be, only comic gays like them which makes sense because comics are only for homosexuals
Great source of dramatic tension though
>art was so shitty characters would explain what's happening in dialogue
jesus christ comics were gay as frick. still are but especial then.
Its not even that. Old comics had a lot of dialog. You had to read quite a bit. New ones have much much less dialog
They were trying to pad the experience with more words words words. Now as another anon said, they have less dialogue. So you read 25 pages in 5 minutes for $4-5 an issue and people wonder why manga sells far better than Western comics. Woke bullshit and terrible writers and artist aside, western comics are dogshit value per dollar for kids and teens with a limited budget.
This should not take 5 panels, this had to be a joke
>This should not take 5 panels, this had to be a joke
As I've gotten older, Stan Lee's "wordplay" has really lost its luster for me. There are better pages in future comics
>Web shooters are fricking stupid
>it's fricking stupid if spooderman shot web out his butt
>didn't name him Brown Recluse or just Recluse
>Not my problem
They dont make em like this anymore
>Kirsten Dunst in a drenched sundress
he even brought it back for 2, man knows beauty when he sees it
>Kirsten Dunst in a drenched sundress
She was never as much of a titty monster in the sequels. I don't know if she lost weight or got a reduction. She's obviously plumped up again over the decades since.
She'd be so good now as MILF-y Jane in a movie based on the Spider-Girl storyline, where Peter and MJ had a daughter
Agreed, Donner Superman and Raimi Spider-Man both managed to really capture that superhero feel in a way that modern capeshit doesn't.
I still like the first one more than the sequel.
Spider-Man 2 is too early for him to have erectile disfunction with his powers and it just takes away from Doctor Octopus, who isn't in the movie enough
>it just takes away from Doctor Octopus, who isn't in the movie enough
yeah they should have given molina more time to chew scenery. the guy is great. i was thrilled to see him in no way home ngl.
>villain does the 'WE WILL MEET AGAIN [HERO]' trope
The amount of SOVL this movie has is unmatched.
this movie is infinitely quoteable
the sign of a good movie
Spider-Man 3 is just as good as the first two, and I’m tired of pretending that it’s not.
its not as good as the first two, but it has its moments
That’s all I’m trying to say, anon 🙁
well the first two movies have tons of moments
the third only has a few and too many villains and an almost laughable harry death scene bro
>let me talk with the villain for 5 minutes while my best friend that tried to kill me for the past 2 movies dies from a stomach and chest wound, slowly, having his hand held by the girl that cucked him not once, but twice along with your former best bro that also killed your dad (but not on purpose and was due his own fathers mental illness that also made him snap as well in the third movie)
its a mess anon, obviously we can agree studio meddling fricked raimi over for the third movie
also frick topher grace lmao that homosexual cannot act for shit, hes a walking punching bag, he was perfectly casted in the Predators (2010?) movie, loved the ending where he gets his comeuppance
Underneath all of that bullshit, all of that terrible studio meddling, it still has some of the magic the first two do. You’re right, but I still enjoy it very much.
There's too many villains. I'm sorry, three is too much. What the hell was this movie trying to achieve?
Good casting but othewise mid af and gigachad Peter has been memed to death.
the spider man 3 posters are so fricking kino
Holy shit
>3