If Lana Baumgartner or Katie Bishop was Miles' love interest instead of Gwen in the Spider-verse movies, would you seethe less?
If Lana Baumgartner or Katie Bishop was Miles' love interest instead of Gwen in the Spider-verse movies, would you seethe less?
I am indifferent to melanin and the melanin adjecent.
Yes anon, that’s the point though without the seething miles has NO draw and nothing to discuss. You future scientists just love it when israelites pit us against each other though.
Frick off back to your containment thread.
Kate couldn't really be used because she's not Spider adjacent or owned by Sony. Lana would be cute but people would still complain.
Not because she's white but because haters quite literally are going to hate. It doesn't matter who you pair or don't pair Miles up with, anything he does is going to cause those people ire.
>anything he does is going to cause those people ire
I wonder why a character that exists only to push a political agenda in what used to be a good comic book story would cause ire in people who used to be fans of that story.
You tell me.
I’ve been saying it for years, pair him with Mattie Franklin it gives Moore his own connection to JJJ and is someone who is already a younger spider. With a bonus that it would piss off both Byrne and bendis. But miles isn’t a character with stories, he’s at best a self insert for sad nerd homies and at worst a propaganda piece for a israelites fetish. He was never meant to have a connection to Peter
>a self insert for sad nerd homies
Like that one loser with the small dick who always posts BBC shit.
Is it the the same guy whose name you can't post without being flagged as spam?
Yes but only marginally, it'd still be an entire trilogy of movies worth half a billion dedicated to one of the most boring and worthless characters in Cinemaphile and the definitive most blatant race token
>would you be happy if these movies that shouldn't exist did something different, but still existed?
Why would we be?
>movies that shouldn't exist
This thread is for Spider-Verse, not Bayformers.
currently Miles stole
>Spider-Woman electric bite
>Static Shock powers
>Kuwabara's energy sword
>Kaine's super spider-sense
>Cloack's invisibility
And now...you want him to steal from Patriot?
Of course people would seethe less, because Lana Baumgartner and Kate Bishop aren't real characters in the same way the Miles Morales isn't a real character. Nobody really gives a shit about them, the same way nobody gives a shit about Jim Wilson or Jarella (hell I care more about Jarella than I do Kate Bishop). But instead they took Gwen Stacy, who is an important character in Peter Parker's history, and used her as another element to give Miles validity instead of just making him an actual character. But Miles isn't a character, he's a lazy tick in the diversity check box.
Also it means that newer readers don't feel the need to go back and read older issues of Spider-man to learn who Gwen was and her significance, because now she's just Miles' mudshark.
No, because I'd still be forced to suffer through Miles' diarrhea-toned complexion, his grotesque pool float lips, his malformed peanut head, his pube hairstyle, his soulless animal eyes, his grating "braying donkey with Down's" voice, his exaggerated black teen swagger, his galaxy-swallowing black hole of charisma, his Marty Stu bullshit, and it would still involve race mixing.
Yea. You know why? Because they are supporting characters for Miles that didn't have to rely on Peter Parker or any connection to him. It's the one complaint people had with Bendis when he made Miles. Is that he has no supporting cast & villains of his own that makes him separate from Peter Parker. Hell, Miles in both ITSV & ATSV movie is just another Peter Parker but black. There are a number of ways to make Miles his own character without the need to give him any connection to Peter, but they still kept using the Pete Parker reference because its the most familiar, & Gwen is that one example because, despite being a completely different of Gwen, she still has that Peter Parker connection
ATSV should have been about Miles's insecurity & fitting in school, & falling for a new love interest, with Miguel as a mentor, as the original cast didn't return, but there are disagreements between the two that formed the conflict involving the whole Spider-Verse
Instead, the movie made him into another Peter Parker, & that's the issue with Miles as a character, & why other writers besides Bendis did him better. & if BTSV keeps repeating that same process then the movie itself will just prove that they can't develop Miles as an original character without taking elements from Peter Parker
& Miles has his own love interests now that are more superior to Gwen, & Lana is just one of a few wo would be a good match to Miles
dick status?
Piercing Miles' crust-hymen atm
We get it, you guys are obsessed with BBC x Trans.
>AIEEEEE MY FETISH IS RUINED!!! SAVE ME BENDISMAN!!!
This coming from the guy obsessing over BBC+Trans.
It's simply the reality of his character. I'm not the one spamming Miles threads.
>It's simply the reality
No, THIS is reality.
>raping a corpse is fine because it's already dead
Probably, there's just something about him hooking up with an AU version of Peter's dead GF who is also an expy of Peter himself with elements of Eddie Brock that just seems... Disturbing...
Fetishes usually don't make sense.
>Fetish
>Fetish
>Fetish
Buddy, this is Cinemaphile. Just be honest with your racism.
Let's own the racists by pointing out their chemistry and why they work.
I'm honest that I have a fetish for brute ugly monster with cute girl. Blacks are this for me.