If Marcus Aurelius was such a great man, why'd he raise such a shit son?

If Marcus Aurelius was such a great man, why'd he raise such a shit son?

CRIME Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    he's da joker baybee
    >captcha: jagkok

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Well he was raised by the best of the time. It was just Commudus had no interest in ruling. It’s his fathers fault for not seeing that. But Believe it or not Commudus was extremely competent in his first few years. But when you put a young man in charger of an entire empire where he could do whatever he want of course he’s just gonna frick off somewhere.

    He’s not even Top ten worst emperors anyways.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    it happens

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >good leader is terrible parent
    many such cases

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Commodus was based as frick, the senator and equestrian classes just couldn’t handle the extent of the mogging he handed them, and the israelites have been lying about him ever since

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Kinda true and very true in Nero's case

      It was the biggest mistake of his rule, the five good emperors were all so successful because they actively vetted and chose the best candidate to replace them rather than simply passing it on to their biological offspring. As soon as Aurelius stopped this process the empire began going to shit again.

      This. Meditations is a huge cope for being a shit father and being indulgent and narcissistic for wanting his child to be his successor instead of choosing the best man for the job like the 4 emperors before him had.
      >sure I suck ass and am a total moron but I'm super stoic while living my life of supreme comfort

      Naming anyone but his son Caesar would have been a recipe for civil war immediately following his death since nobody else had any will nor claim to the throne and anyone he picked would have had his opponents just rally around Commodus. It was either name Commodus heir or literally murder him to secure the rule of whoever else you name

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Nah, he should have done what this

        He should have nominated an senior official as co-emperor to replace him until commodus reached consul age.

        anon said, it worked well enough for Aurelius himself being heir presumptive while Antoninus Pius led the empire for twenty years. Name a wise older statesmen with no kids heir with the understanding that he would train Commodus to take over after the older statesmen died, if things work out then Commodus would be wise and ready to take the throne but if the worst happened and Commodus grew up to be a shitter then he could be disposed of and a more appropriate heir chosen.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Naming anyone but his son Caesar would have been a recipe for civil war immediately following his death since nobody else had any will nor claim to the throne and anyone he picked would have had his opponents just rally around
        Why not? Every emperor since Nerva had done that and it seemed to work wonders considering that the romans themselves regarded the Nerva-Antonine dynasty as "the empire of gold".

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          None of the Antonines actually had a biological son for anyone to rally around.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Meh, most of them were distantly related to each other through marriage or distaff.
            Marcus Aureluis should just have married of one his his daughters to a competent relative.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Why?
              Besides, one of the Commodus's sisters tried to kill Commodus anyway, then paid the price.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Because he was too busy being an emperor and had no time to be personally raising his son. He was on the war front for many years.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He actually took his son to the front with him, and made in co-emperor-in-training for a few years before his death. Aurelius is the kind of man who was a great leader, but whose same qualities would have made him an awful father and an awful boss. He was the kind of guy who believes in duty above all else, but gave no encouragement or kudos whatsoever for fulfilling one's obligations to the letter, because it's what's expected of you. This is pure speculation on my part, but Commodus likely fell short of Marcus's expectations constantly as a child, felt like a disappointment, and developed some sort of resentment towards his father and the duty he represented. From what I know about the real Commodus, he loved the games, chillmaxxing, and the unearned respect and deification that being emperor gave him.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Marcus had 20 years of training (including gradually taking on more responsibilities) to grow into the role before he became Emperor.
        Commodus was 19 years old when the task befell him.

        So yeah, no kidding, you're a teenager and you're suddenly in charge of the entire Empire. Sounds like a sitcom. Aurelius just died too soon.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          He should have nominated an senior official as co-emperor to replace him until commodus reached consul age.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Nah, he should have done what this [...] anon said, it worked well enough for Aurelius himself being heir presumptive while Antoninus Pius led the empire for twenty years. Name a wise older statesmen with no kids heir with the understanding that he would train Commodus to take over after the older statesmen died, if things work out then Commodus would be wise and ready to take the throne but if the worst happened and Commodus grew up to be a shitter then he could be disposed of and a more appropriate heir chosen.

            Commodus was eager to be emperor iirc. If Marcus appointed anyone else to be emperor, Commodus might have thrown a fit and cause a civil war.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            That's how it started. Commodus appeared before the troops at the centre of a group of his father's friends. Then sometime later they tried to kill him because Commodus favored different friends.

            Nah, he should have done what this [...] anon said, it worked well enough for Aurelius himself being heir presumptive while Antoninus Pius led the empire for twenty years. Name a wise older statesmen with no kids heir with the understanding that he would train Commodus to take over after the older statesmen died, if things work out then Commodus would be wise and ready to take the throne but if the worst happened and Commodus grew up to be a shitter then he could be disposed of and a more appropriate heir chosen.

            Wouldn't work because, unlike Marcus, Commodus was a biological son of the emperor. Waiting for anything wasn't on the table.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >If Marcus Aurelius was such a great man,
    pretentious c**t who really didnt have any novel interesting ideas
    if he were alive today he'd be namegayging on /sig/ or some shit

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This. Meditations is a huge cope for being a shit father and being indulgent and narcissistic for wanting his child to be his successor instead of choosing the best man for the job like the 4 emperors before him had.
      >sure I suck ass and am a total moron but I'm super stoic while living my life of supreme comfort

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Marcus Aurelius was a great man,
    >however...

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It was the biggest mistake of his rule, the five good emperors were all so successful because they actively vetted and chose the best candidate to replace them rather than simply passing it on to their biological offspring. As soon as Aurelius stopped this process the empire began going to shit again.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >I did not say I knew him, I said he touched me on the shoulder once!

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Fricking have a nice day

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Nerva is presented unfairly here. Choosing Trajan as heir speaks for itself.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Alright, Antonius Pius made me laugh

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      i don't know much about roman history but RESTITVTOR ORBIS is without a doubt the coolest title in history

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The Byzantines had some cool ass nicknames too, Nikephoros II "The Pale Death of the Sarracens" or Basil II "The Bulgar Slayer" among others

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Why is Septimus Severus depicted as brown when he would have been mediterranean like all the other emperors

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        WE WUZ ROMAN EMPERORS N SHEEEEIT

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Augustus deserves the highest praise. He set the standard for what it meant to be an emperor. Only thing you could say negative about him was that he was a bubble boy who didnt command any battles

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        He should have kept his wife and daughters on a leash.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      ic claudius reallyy based?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Compared to the rest of the Julio-Claudian emperors sans Augustus he was a saint.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        He played the fool the best, under his reign there were more treason trials than under caligula but since he wasn't a degenerate, conquered Britannia and it seemed like some of those trials were actually based on reality, he's remembered as a based emperor

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      For me? It's Valentinian I, who was so upset by some impertinent goth envoys he literally raged himself to death

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >any Good emperors on the Left
      garbage spectrum

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      why are Cinemaphile users such massive redditors

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Aurelian is the best emperor in history

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Julius Caesar was never the emperor you fricking idiot

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Did you bother to read his panel before posting this

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          no because he wasn't the emperor and shouldn't be on the list

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That "Caligula picks a horse as consul" is horseshit btw

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        heh

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Most great men of history were shit father's

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    ask your dad.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Good screenshot. Imagine having some autist le stoic as a father. It would be fricking shit. Stoicism is for boring c**ts anyway Epicureanism is the superior philosophy.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Epicureanism
        that's just hedonism

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It is a refined form of hedonism, yes, not the overindulgent, self-destructive hedonism that we see today.

          You can be stoic and still show emotions. Aurelius was just extremely autistic.

          I suppose so.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Hedonism is based
          >muh hedonic treadmill
          As if a hedonist would ever get on a treadmill.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You can be stoic and still show emotions. Aurelius was just extremely autistic.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Aurelius was just extremely autistic.
          I love him so much. <3

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Marcus Aurelius went literally insane over his never ending war against the g*rms. By the end of it he was considering annexing a huge new province on the wrong side of the Danube and call it Marcomannia, as indefensible as Dacia but without gold mines. Cool dude but he wasted his realm and lost his sanity fighting third worlders basically

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      might also have something to do with hitting a genetic shit lottery with his children and also that plague that killed like 10% of the empire

      Commodus also was a sickly weak child who almost died from some disease that might have caused irreparable brain damage when he was a child

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >he fell for the nurture assumption

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >early in 192 Commodus, declaring himself the new Romulus, ritually re-founded Rome, renaming the city Colonia Lucia Annia Commodiana
    I'm surprised he wasn't immediately killed after he pulled that shit.

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Commodus did nothing wrong. People were just scared of a real-life gigachad meme.

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    too busy killing hebrews

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That was Hadrian. Or before him Vespasian.

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Who raised Cain?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Someone who wasn't abel

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    you can have a great career or a great family you can't have both each requires hard work

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    My favourite Dumbledore.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      homosexual died and ruined harry potter
      S

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You bet your funky little arse.

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    didn't he lose a bunch of sons that were groomed for leadership? then commodus was the reject that got it by default

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >The assassination attempt
    resembled – perhaps not by coincidence – the murder of Caligula in 41. As
    Commodus entered the hunting-theatre, Quintianus, a boon companion of
    the emperor, appeared in the narrow passage: holding out his weapon he cried, ‘The Senate sends you this – dagger!’ This allowed the bodyguards time to seize him, justifying the verdict of the Historia Augusta, fatuus.
    Quintianus and Quadratus were executed, along with others, Lucilla was exiled and later put to death. Her husband Pompeianus withdrew from
    public life.
    b***h sister, b***h Senate. His purges were justified.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The Historia Augusta is not a reliable source of information. Just like The israeli War it is propaganda steeped in ulterior motives whose authorship is fabricated/suspect.

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Dominitian
    What was his problem?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Ignored by his father and brother
      >Gets no praise for sacking Judea/Jerusalem
      >Raised by his women and senatorial cucks
      >Introvert with anxiety
      >Nearly dies while hiding in Rome during year of four emperors
      >Overshadowed by Titus
      >Gets told he'll die at noon
      >Balding
      >Becomes emperor after Titus dies
      >Actually pretty good at running shit
      >Reforms the mint and designs some nice coins
      >Rebases the denarius to 90% silver
      >Builds the limes germanicus which protects the empire during the reign of Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus
      >BTFOs the corrupt senatorial class
      >Builds a massive palace complex used by every emperor after him
      >Holds tons of public events
      >Doesn't kneel to senate so they conspire to kill him
      >He gets ahead of them and starts killing the conspirators
      >Goes a little too far and his advisors get concerned and kill him
      Tragic if you ask me. He was based

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        ~~*Five Good Emperors*~~

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          You mean to tell me the roman coinage was debased further and futher as military expenditure rose?
          No way man, I don't believe you.

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    My father is a great man in his professional life but on the home front he has a wife that hates him, one son who’s insane and will probably end up being a spree killer, and another who’s a depressed shut-in with no friends or relationships working a dead-end job (me).

    Many men are great in their professional lives but shit at their personal ones.

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    he was an absent father

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Commudus was a massive homosexual. Go read up on history.
    If he was born today he would watch Twitch influencer shit, simp for Pokimane and listen to Die Antwoord.
    Marcus Aurelius was one of the greatest but he was a weakass simp when it comes to blood relations.
    The modus operandi was to never put blood relatives as the next ruler into power, but rather as a pater putativus to always choose the best, most promising and most capable successor.
    The couple times this tradition was ignored, it ended in tragedy.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      reading the first two lines of what you wrote fills me with such a strong will to smash your head in with a sledgehammer till it's nothing but pink and white pulp

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        you wont do shit

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >If he was born today
      He would become The Rock

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >The modus operandi was to never put blood relatives as the next ruler into power
      Larp revisionist liberalism wank. Of the so called five good emperors, Marcus was the only one to have a son at all, so that's 1/1 of emperors who did have biological sons survive childhood. Nerva was too old, Trajan no kids but DID choose a blood relative since Hadrian was his cousin, Hadrian was a gay, Antoninus' blood sons died early. It was in no way a tradition to select the most worthy heir over family

      >Ignored by his father and brother
      >Gets no praise for sacking Judea/Jerusalem
      >Raised by his women and senatorial cucks
      >Introvert with anxiety
      >Nearly dies while hiding in Rome during year of four emperors
      >Overshadowed by Titus
      >Gets told he'll die at noon
      >Balding
      >Becomes emperor after Titus dies
      >Actually pretty good at running shit
      >Reforms the mint and designs some nice coins
      >Rebases the denarius to 90% silver
      >Builds the limes germanicus which protects the empire during the reign of Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus
      >BTFOs the corrupt senatorial class
      >Builds a massive palace complex used by every emperor after him
      >Holds tons of public events
      >Doesn't kneel to senate so they conspire to kill him
      >He gets ahead of them and starts killing the conspirators
      >Goes a little too far and his advisors get concerned and kill him
      Tragic if you ask me. He was based

      Based, he was top 10 best and I'm tired of pretending otherwise

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >If he was born today

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >listen to Die Antwoord.
      based

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        S. Africa seems like a shithole

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Good times breed weak men

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    > inbreeding

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Absolutely does not apply in this case, read the thread.

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    there was a joe rogan clip that made it to youtube with ryan holiday professional grifter that loves stoicism and marcus aurelius
    he said it was because the prince was brought up a prince with a busy father, where as marcus aurelius was an orphan and adopted because he was seen to be virtuous

    was pretty interesting

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Your faults as a son, is my failure as a father.

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Same reason Hunter Biden smokes crack

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >ameriturds actually believe that the "Good Emperors" actually wanted to bring the republic back and that's why they were good
    >ameriturds actually believe that the "bad" emperors were anti-republican and that's why they were bad
    kek truly brainless cratures

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Ridley Scott is a Bong.

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    a lot of dads ask themselves that same question

    t. shit son

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah same here

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Marcus was a strange exception to the rule.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Power corrupts
      It doesn't. Power attracts the corruptible. That's why monarchy is the best, most natural, and longest lasting form of rule.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Nah, I think a a Greek polis democracy is better

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Perhaps. But it's not scalable.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >t. Frank Herbert fan

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I prefer "chairdog enjoyer".

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            What book is this?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              A book I’ve read many times.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Im guessing one of the dune novels but Ive only read the first , I think they are talking about the bene gesserit , basically witches that have trained their minds and bodies to near perfection

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Heretics of Dune. His horny phase for some reason. It's toned down in the next book, except for that one child rape.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                He wasn’t horny it was about taking the idea of control to the extreme. Pure autist that guy was. The bene geseret become sort of a foil for Jessica who gave birth to Paul out of love, she was the so called heretic.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Allowing some 50 IQ sperg run the country simply because he's the previous ruler's son is the the best, most natural, and longest lasting form of rule. Why? Because his advisors will most likely be corruptible.
        How does that make sense in your head?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Strawmanning won’t save you

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Allowing
          A population that does that deserves to be crushed by some degenerate. Replace him. The second in line, or create a new line.

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    le good times create le weak men

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Good question, I have same with Rama 9

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *