If they hated Scar so much why did they wait until Simba came back to overthrow him?
 |
 |
|
If they hated Scar so much why did they wait until Simba came back to overthrow him?
If they hated Scar so much why did they wait until Simba came back to overthrow him?
|
|
|
Horny
What do you expect a pack of smaller animals to do against a full grown male lion?
and a horde of hyenas
There were like 20 of them and Scar got killed by even weaker hyenas, meanwhile Simba spent years eating only bugs i doubt he was peak male lion at the time but he still was stronger than Scar.
You know that it's the female lions who rule the Pride right? They are the main hunters and they would murder Scar if they wanted.
Lionesses sometimes gang up and frick up usurpers that threaten their cubs irl
Dude...female lions drive off and kill males they consider weak all the time. This was just Disney injecting human behavior onto animals.
Scar is built like a twig, any one of them could've easily solo'd his ass.
ROFLMAO his face in the second pic. See what happens when you can only get it up 49 times a day instead of 50?
Scar was the only male lion left
And? That's the circle of life, baby.
Female lions are known to roam and bring back a suitable male to drive their male off if they don't do it themselves.
That's exactly what happens in the movie though
Pretty much. It's just that most people don't know that it happens more often irl. Ever since tv networks stopped showing regular nature shows, the average person now doesn't know nearly as much about animal behavior as someone born in the 70's-80's.
So you are saying Nala was just out cruising for dick when she happened upon Simba?
She was out looking for ANY other lion she thought could beat Scar. Just so happened she found Simba.
Women can't do what's right, even if they believe in what's right, they supress it in favor of what everyone else believes in
They base their actions and beliefs entirely on what's safe and socially approved for them to do, they rarely speak up until someone else does
So do all men except the main character.
Zazu
Coward. All he could do was give some snarky comments.
Why is it every time a posts starts with "women" it ends up sounding like a pent up vent over a break up
>Woman incapable of fathoming something that doesn't relate to sex or relationships
Lol
You sure love the Bechdel test.
Don't incels revolve their entire identity around sex and relationships (or lack thereof)?
Every post on this website about an opposite race or gender is the most tinfoil hat, basement-dwelling nonsense you've ever heard in your life. And if you disagree, you're obviously (people being strawmanned).
It's just basic sociology. Too bad you can't describe the negative characteristics of women without being called an incel or jilted lover. It's so disingenuous and avoids actually arguing the point. Attack the argument and not the speaker. Coward.
Spartan women could.
Yeah and their culture is fricking dead, their people lost to time, and their lands occupied by the descendants of their conquerors.
Though there may be a greater beauty in that kind of ending compared to your history being lost in assimilation.
Fifth post best post
Too much Hamlet
Woman moment.
A bad king was probably better than no king.
Prob this. If you buy into the theory that the decrepit state of the Pride Lands during Scar's reign is due to some force of the universe not recognizing his rule as legitimate instead of mismanagement, things wouldn't have improved if another outsider took control
>theory
The directors have flat out stated that it is a Fisher King situation in the Pride Lands. This is basically a case of "Nobody pays attention to behind the scenes material" like how that big Aladdin theory of "The Peddler is the Genie in disguise" was something that anybody who read or watched making of stuff already knew.
Even as a kid, I picked up on that Lion King detail pretty quickly.
Just know that he was dicking EVERY single lioness in that picture. All of them. Plus Simba's mom before she died.
His dick. In all of them. Nonstop jizzfest for Scar.
Well obviously, that’s what male lions do. They frick all the females in the pride and sleep.
Because that would mess with the plot, duh
When Simba took down Nala, do you think he knew he was plowing into Scar's sloppy seconds?
No telling how much goop was caked up in there, no showers in the Pride Lands!
Thats how women work. Going with the winners is a survival thing, happens all the time in war where women immediately switch sides and beg to be bred instead of going down with their country. Then they'll switch back if the tables turn again. It's an often overlooked part of why war torn countries have such high infant mortality rates but lack the maternal mortality rates to match.
This is a strange way to conceptualize sex and war. It's cartoonishly simple in how it avoids the human suffering inherent to to these concepts.
Also it's misogynistic as hell.
While cartoonishly simple,as you put it, it's not as strange as you would like to believe.
I'm not saying its logically wrong. It makes sense when you think about it from a survival standpoint...
For most of human history until the geneva conventions were enacted rape and looting was commonplace in war.
On that same note, a country's businessmen would switch sides just like women did in order to protect themselves and majority of their riches from looting. Seemingly safe investments on what appears to be the right horse in the moment. Women do the same thing. Their investment collateral is more time than money (time pregnant, time raising the kid after its born,etc), but the overall logic is the same.
Submission results in a greater chance of survival than facing violence head-on. Willing submission and being able to physically experience upsides as a result of evolutionary pressures makes the decision easier to go through with, almost a no-brainer when hormones come into play.
Infant mortality rates and maternal mortality rates rise at similarly high levels in war torn countries. and I'm not even sure how that would support your point.... do you think the women are killing their own children to make space for another child? wouldn't the more reasonable conclusion be that the children being killed are the product of sexual violence themselves?
also shows how little you know about pregnancy, because , it is INCREDIBLY difficult to kill your own child after giving birth. you become immediately attached to them. Realistically, infant mortality rates rise because of the lack of infrastructure to support children with health problems
And also, "switching sides when convenient" is how everyone works. Contrary, men more so than women. Men are seven times more likely to leave their wives if they have brain cancer than vice versa. The same pattern applies for all diseases, and most hardships. Woman are generally more loyal, or as you said, "have higher investment". Men can plant seed anywhere.
>Infant mortality rates and maternal mortality rates rise at similarly high levels in war torn countries.
Not true
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003810
>conflicts classified as wars were associated with an increase in maternal mortality of 36.9 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births
>an increase in infant mortality of 2.8 per 1,000 live births
Normalizing infant mortality to 100K live births means an increase of 2800 infant deaths per 1000 live births during wartime compared to women only going up by 36.9 deaths.
The rate change for babies is insanely higher, and nowhere near a "similar increase".
In fact you could clearly argue that the ratio of maternal to infant mortality rates worsen during wartime. More babies die compared to their mothers who see their relative odds of survival skyrocket during wartime. Strange.
*2800 infant deaths per 100k live births
whoops
Womanbros, how do we respond? This doesn't look good.
Isnt this easily explained by the fact that children are far more fragile than adult women and thus, much more likely to due from disease, starvation and flat out violence? The kinds of things that occur in war torn countries. I dont see that from just a statistical increase in child mortality you can conclude that its the mothers killing their children.
>it is INCREDIBLY difficult to kill your own child after giving birth.
Tinfoil hat anons would like to tell you about explanations for sudden infant death syndrome.
There's also China's method of digging a hole in the ground during pregnancy. They plant a tree if it's a boy.
>Woman are generally more loyal
Divorce rates in feminist post-industrial societies. Abortion and other planned parenthood methods. Waiting until 38 to settle down. et cetera.
Actually I'm going to add on to this, I don't think "rising at similar rates" was descriptive enough. You realize that just 200 years ago the child mortality rate was 40%. Forty percent of children didn't make it to five, really wrap your head around that, really think about it.
Children used to die left and right- that's why people had so many. I get the feeling that you're going to go back and compare the rates and go "durrr one's higher than the other" without realizing how fragile infants are, and how the dramatic rise in child survival is the result of modern medicine and modern infrastructure supporting it.
They tried in a deleted scene, they couldn't do anything because of all the fricking Hyenas.
Why did they even hated Scar? It was Mufasa who sent those clouds to the pride stone because he was butthurt over Scar. Like, yeah, shit sucks bro, your brother betrayed you so you send those poisoned gas clouds to frick with every other animal in the pride stone until Simba grows up and dethrones your brother?
You could've caused a mass extinction event.
That was the idea? I thought it was Scar mismanaging the kingdom. The movie outright stated the hyenas were overfeeding and throwing the ecosystem out of whack.
This. Scar effectively used a mercinary army to overthrow the King. Hyena's were his "friends", but Scar thought controlling their idiocy would yield his control over the Kingdom. Instead he ended up reliant on a deadly chaotic and voracious omnivorous threat that bled the grasslands dry.
It makes me wonder if perhaps the hyenas are not actually native to the land and are in actuality, an invasive species. It seems strange to me how the lions manage to coexist with literally every other animal except for the hyenas. The elephant graveyard isn't that far off from the Pride Rock and its supporting regions either. If fhe hyenas were naturally part of the environment, I don't think there would have been a concentrated effort to existentially put them in a ghetto. Like real life hyenas do well enough just existing in Africa and feeding off the scraps left by thr lions.
For the same reason Mufasa didn’t banish scar: he’s family, their pride, so they had a loyalty to him.
Knowing he murked Mufasa (and attempted to do the same to Simba) was the moment they went “alright frick this guy” and decided to fight back despite the odds. The lionesses probably would’ve just left otherwise.
Lionesses also have vulnerable necks so finding atleast one male to fight scar was a safety precaution.
?? That didn’t happen
>?? That didn’t happen
It fricking did. Scar couldn't summon clouds, only Mufasa was shown being able to do that. He was the one who summoned the wrath of destruction to the Pride, so his people wouldn't think Scar was a good leader.
> I thought it was Scar mismanaging the kingdom
How exactly did Scar dried the rivers and made the skies permanently cloudy? Think, please.
Only one being had the power to control the weather, it was Mufasa. He's the one who laid waste on the land.
If Simba is dead and they overthrow Scar then who will protect the pride against the Mexican fish?
Nala?? Pumba??
Madness.
They only attacked him after he admitted he killed Mufasa though. I guess THAT was the straw that broke the lion's back(get it?!?!?!?!?)
He has all the hyenas backing him and he's about the only royal male and the lone male lion. Scar was a horrible ruler, but if they lose him, they'll lose Pride Rock as an "institution" and the probable future of the pride itself. That's why they jumped almost instantly when Simba came. Scar was so bad that the Lionesses were more willing to support a probable malnourished Lion with no real training over him.
>Why did the women follow the man until a younger, stronger man showed up and kicked his ass?
The world may never know.
You delusional frickheads are taking the piss if you think Scar would be caught dead anywhere near some female puss
He literally had a son.
And daughter
Vitani wasn't his. Only the genetic mess that is Nuka.
Wait, Vitani's female?
In every language's dub. You couldn't tell by her voice as a cub and adult??
Nope. He... she, reminded me of Simba so I guess as a kid that's just how I perceived her. Plus her voice in English is kind of boyish anyway, just softer.
how about the complete lack of a mane you know like how female lions are
Yep, nope, didn't make the connection. Not too bright of a kid, was I?
Even if Scar was gay, would that really change anything? The only other male lions are (or were) his relatives. Part of how kings support and protect their power is by creating progeny. Scar may had to bite down on a stick and went on with it for thst reason alone.
I know the sequel was never intended, but where were all of Scar's supporters during the coup? Did they all happen to be hunting?
They needed someone to dick them down. Once Simba showed up he could fulfill that role.
Thats not how nature works. Scar probably fricked them all and killed their cubs, too.
Women.
How else were they gonna have babies? Boink the hyenas?
>boink
back to twitter
>How else were they gonna have babies? Boink the hyenas?
Perhaps
It's funny how people started to hate on women and talk about politics kek.
The simple in universe answer is that he had many hyenas as allies and male lions are stronger, so he could take out like 2-3 females solo.
In the end Simba came back and help overthrow Scar, but Scar was killed by his hyenas for betraying them. If scar actually cared about the hyenas he might have won. Notice that he was killed by his own allies.
So he was such a shitty ruler that even hyenas didn't like him.
>only starts to rain when Scar is killed
How is Mufasa NOT the bad guy here?
Simba didn't kill him/fully defeat him the hyenas did. Who are too disorganised to rule without him, they ate all the food and didn't care about the circle of life.
Imagine the secx these lioness have with human men
Because until that point they still saw scar as the rightful ruler of the pride and pack of hyenas he was working with likely acted as a deterrent to any lionesses who contemplated overthrowing him
Do you think Simba fricked his own mom?
>dad dies
>majority female household immediately turns into harem (for the killer)
>everything is absolute chaos until the sole son grows up and becomes a man
The "having a daughter is the ultimate cuck" meme makes more sense than ever now.
Thank god the Loud House is just a cartoon and nobody actually has to live knowing that they are a step away from a Lion King horror and a journey through hell for their son. Imagine living life with 10 daughters and no son who is old enough to have your back in an invasion.
It was just anti commie propaganda. Stop overthinking it.
The butthurt straight males have really taken a liking to this post huh
Why do you come here.
Reddit exists to house you.
Why are you here.
Incest try to accept that homosexuals exist on the internet challenge level 100 IMPOSSIBLE
Butthurt about the reality of war?
women are useless by themselves
Doesn't france have a law stopping fathers doing paternity test without government approval? Paris was getting too many single mothers.
Why do you have a woman folder? What were you planning to use this for?
Oh. That's a /misc/ gay trying to radicalize random boards for no reason
Holy shit that's hot...
Just needed a fart. :9
Boomers: "I don't want gay people in my kids movies because it's going to indoctrinate them and it's inappropriate"
Also boomers:
Women folder-anon, you're telling the truth, but I wouldn't post that here because Cinemaphile is a SJW board. Better off posting on /misc/.
Wouldn't the muh honor thing apply to men?
>happen to be too still too young to be dragged into army
>country is taken over by different people
>they don't kill you because they need workforce for the newly conquered land
Option 1: fight back against invaders - die or maybe luck out and
Option 2: submit - get to live, maybe get a girl and procreate
We have Normans conquering Great Britain as an example. Did they slaughter every man in sight?
Different example: Partitions of Poland - 123 years of varying levels of oppression and attempts of depolonization of conquered population that probably only made controlling the place harder that if they were to let people do their traditions.
Also, think again. Do you really think tribe/society/nation would tolerate their woman casually getting impregnated by an invader? Who would support her? The invader is most likely to keep on marching to die in war or go back home to his wife.
>Wouldn't the muh honor thing apply to men?
>happen to be too still too young to be dragged into army
>country is taken over by different people
>they don't kill you because they need workforce for the newly conquered land
>Option 1: fight back against invaders - die or maybe luck out and
>Option 2: submit - get to live, maybe get a girl and procreate
Agreed. Many people submit to their conquerors to live another day.
>We have Normans conquering Great Britain as an example. Did they slaughter every man in sight?
No, just the ones who are clearly willing and capable of fighting back. The rest get put to work and effectively enslaved if not outright enslaved.
>Also, think again. Do you really think tribe/society/nation would tolerate their woman casually getting impregnated by an invader? Who would support her? The invader is most likely to keep on marching to die in war or go back home to his wife.
They'd have to tolerate it and historically they often have. In fact thats exactly what happened for example with the Koreans as the Japanese instituted the comfort women policies.
>Doesn't it apply to men too
Yes BUT.
For men it isn't sexual it's related to labor, some level of strength is required to plow a field.
My point is
>This sounds like misogynistic shit
Which it is.
But it's true.
The moment women got butthurt about reality not showing them as being fanfiction Mary sues in real life again.
>I am a MAN. Enemy of the WOMAN.
Nobody is buying this goofy act. Is this a bot that was meant to be shitposting on /misc/?
No, dipshit.
It was literally in response to someone saying
>this is misogynistic
>yes but it's true whether you like it or not
No one is forcing women to continue like this anyway, but keep in mind TLK takes place during Hamlet times even if it's about lions.
Letting your conquered males persist to fight another day is why old testament israeli war tactics call for killing every single male of your enemy population after you win.
>Scar didn't finish the job
>Simba wants Kovu dead in TLK2
So Scar is Palestine and Simba is Israel?
Was the drought actually Scars fault or was that a trick?
And yet most males of conquered populations have gotten to live on. The fact of the matter is that when you conquer a land, if you want immediate rewards, you need the local peasantry to keep working. Replacing them with your own peasantry is extremely costly as you would need to uproot and move them and that would cost you homeland their workforce. The most efficient method is to kill important key figures and import your own nobility to rule as well as grant land to your soldiers. Eventually, your soldiers will join the local peasantry and create a mixed work force which is much more amenable to your rule.
Cont. Also many powers through history have followed certain war guidelines. Many of which involve the relative respect of non combatants. Most medieval christian kingdoms ascribed to these, so land conquering wasnt genocidally bloody.
Most males died on the battlefield after a draft while the remaining conquered males were enslaved. The majority of able bodied men were not at home during wartime throughout human history. Militaries of volunteers are a recent phenomenon.
That is just not true anon. Universal drafts were not a thing for the majority of human history. Most cultures have had either a warrior class or a professional army because you need your country to still function even at war. Most western ancient civilizations had professional armies that you willingly entered and had little to no forced conscription. This stayed true both in the middle ages and in modernity. Universal drafts are an extremely modern phenomenon borne out of the world wars where technology was potent enough to threaten complete annihilation. During the middle ages most conquering was done simply by replacing the local nobility with new ones and the local peasantry was hardly affected save for the occasional village rape/massacre by the passing army.
>We have Normans conquering Great Britain as an example. Did they slaughter every man in sight?
They killed off the nobles and replaced them.
They did not kill off the serfs.
It was not a "sea peoples" invasion. It was not modern mass immigration. It was a handful of soldiers.
Non-barbed wiener ahah imagine
Nala is hot.
Sarabi is hotter
Why not both
Given how much /misc/ liked to spew anti woman crap like this wouldn't this imply that they can't find meaningful relationships with women? Also given the fact that alt right politicians have a history of being outed for sus shit I'm starting to wonder if they like men but won't admit it.
The thread is improving by the minute
Women need men to lead them.
Funny how this scene ruined the lives of most men.
Not a furry, but
You guys must have had screwed up imaginations. I thought Nala was cute growing up but I never wanted to frick her lol. I guess I'm just different.
Same. I thought they were cuddling. I literally knew what sex was, but the idea of penetration never even occurred to me.
You are the weirdos then, too innocent 😛
Honestly I think both anti men and anti women rhetoric are equally moronic.
Based fence sitter. May your grilled meats earn you many cups of God's sake.
lol France banned these didn't they
Yeah in France it's not legal to get a paternity test unless a judge orders it with the consent of the mother and father. This is because according to French law, when you marry a woman, you are legally agreeing to take care of any children she has for life, independent of that child's parentage.
Did someone compare Disney's Lion King to Palestine/Israel conflict? Why are you disrupting a Lion King thread?
Not yet but lets take it there. Who's who in that situation?
>Some women are attracted to serial killers, therefore women are trash.
>Some men are serial killers, therefore those individual men, singled out, are trash and maybe not, maybe they are alpha males.
Boy I sure love the privilege of being judged as an individual.
To keep things realistic.
If they do so the movie will end at the 60 something minutes or whenever minute Sarabi nags Scar, then there's no Lion King and that's the point of the movie meaning if you don't have a lion king then you have a different movie.
How many baby lions do you guys think died during the start of Scar's reign? We dont see any of the cubs who should have been born right when he was taking control.
how long after Scar's reign did the drought start?
According to the wiki the drought starts literally as soon as he takes the throne, which seems a bit odd if you ask me since he literally could not have done anything in the first second of gaining power:https://lionking.fandom.com/wiki/Famine
If this is to believed then it's almost as if some divine force wanted babies to die.
>divine force wanted babies to die
Why would he do this? Those were HIS BABIES!!
>Scar never klilled any babies
>he let Simba live and just told him to run away
>Mufasa killed a bunch of cubs just out of spite
And Simba's roar brought the rain back
God is cool. he would never kill anyone's babies just to prove a point
Plot. Irl they would have kicked him out or at least kill the hyenas.
Doubt. IRL they'd be war brides doing exactly what happened in the movie. Which is probably why nobody called Shakespeare out for the same thing in Hamlet. For better or worse it's a realistic outcome for everyone to have to either wait for the chosen son's nuts to drop or accept their new life.
>New Life
If none of them frick Scar or want his kids the Pride is doomed to failure. It's just weird they tolerated their home becoming Hell for that long until Simba miraculously returned.
>If none of them frick Scar
That's not how lions work.
If the situation calls for it they would refuse to mate or go into a false heat.
Their food is all gone and they have no bond or connection to the Hyenas. It's one thing to not want to fight Scar but just staying there, starving, and unable to have cubs makes no sense.
That's not how survival works.
Survival works by tolerating Hell, or even embracing it. Hence war brides instead of women going down with the ship.
Like it or not, Skar had a "legitimate" claim to the throne. That and he brought a paramilitary force with him.
Lioness milk!
What do you fellas reckon would happen if Stitch was let loose in a warzone with a 70% widow population?
This is true. I work in medical IT and most of the tickets were get from directors are females who ask for weird shit.
Don't get me wrong, I have a screwed up mind but it somehow never got up for Nala. Weird
Can we get back to lioness hentai please
>these emails
>Bryan Bullock - "hi, I'm chad"
It's all bot-spam, isn't it?
hey guys, did you know i have a 13 inch penis and a ten-pack? and i'm on my way to impregnate that stacy you work with
>Thanks for the advice.
>Hey boss.
>Thanks, it's really no big deal.
>Haha, I bet you say that to all the cashiers.
I talk to lots of old people for work and the flirty old ladies always make me smile. I wish younger women were as forward as them.
>I wish younger women were as forward as them.
I experienced girls being more forward when I was a small kid, computers barely started to make their way into households, so no social media and such. To be fair it was also before my personality went to that of loner for some reason, possibly due to gaming addiction, who knows.
The school bullying part is kind of berserk button for me as I experienced it myself. You just don't come out as the same person after that.
>Implying it's not the chick who wants to go and see if she can trade up.
are y'all really this attracted to women in general? 95% of women look like demons in human skin
That's because they are demons in human skin.
The mods ruined the thread
You try to give actual men compliments and they think you want to frick them. They'll think you're joking or trying to insult them.
Did you mean to put a negative somewhere in that first sentence?
>You try to give actual men compliments and they think you want to frick them.
Woman wouldn't bother giving compliments otherwise, which causes men to not any compliments for years, increasing it's "value" in terms of strength. A vicious cycle, isn't it?
That is an interesting phenomenon but there's no way women would understand that. They'll continue to shit on betas and then be surprised at the reaction when they don't shit on the beta for once... that interaction and realization is basically carved in the "time is a flat circle" stone at this point.
I find it pretty funny that women are pretty much setting themselves to be abused by "chad" troublemaker or just left as single mother because father doesn't give a shit about kid.
I don't really believe we are so fricked up biologically. Such chaotic behavior while being individually weak social animals wouldn't give good prospects for survival, many animals are better at being monogamous ffs. Yet if we were to actually manage to do so, how so? Are we like real-world example of goblins? Just breed so fast than any moronation won't kill our species?
I suppose they know of not shitting in the place you work at. Also, what dressing well means at all? Wearing jeans and buttoned shirt everyday is quite bothersome.
Eh, the place I work at now is very chill. Very few people over 35. Guys and girls compliment each other and don't date or frick around. A guy who dresses well can get multiple compliments a day.
Men tend to put less effort into their appearance in general. People like to compliment effort.
cute lion
No!
Anon don't!
why are lionesses so cute bros
their faces are just so aesthetic
I'm a virgin too, I just assumed due to the rhetoric. My bad.
The word incel means frick all anymore it's basically just another "chud" "dudebro" "Karen" etc etc... aka 'person i dislike' and you know it
I mean, the comment that started this all did read like something an actual incel would say. And by incel I mean somebody who buys into the rethoric that the only reason women dont want him is because of things he has no control over whatsoever so we have to institute sexual communism. I call people who abscribe to that incels.
>She created all of these headcanons about a post that didn't even say anything of the sort
Anon...
The ideology is basically there. I bet if we prompt anon a bit more we can get the rest.
Idk anon you're kinda sounding like a radical feminist right now be careful, if I take everything you say and make it 500% more extreme it might sound kinda extreme
I sound like a radical feminist because I am describing a certain pattern of interrelated beliefs that other people hold? I guess I also sound like an aristotelian if I describe platonism.
The original anon was also describing a pattern of interrelated beliefs that other people hold
Actually no, he was describing what he believes women are capable or incapable of doing, not what they accidentally do or dont believe. He was describing a natural kind, not a belief.
Anon, let's play a game
Yes or no: Men are taller than women
Depends on what you mean. If you mean, statistically men are taller than women, then yes. If you mean all men are taller than all women, then no.
If I told you, "men are taller than women" and you had to choose if I'm right or wrong, what would you say? Only one option.
Also IF I made that claim, would you be upset because I'm not being clear enough
I am just telling you anon that the claim is vague. You could resort to heuristics of the kind 'this is what most people understand when they hear that, so you should to'. But that is external to the claim itself.
Lets take the first interpretation then, statistically, men are on average taller than women. Then yes, that is true.
So... I've been arguing with a sub IQ individual then
Goddamit
Ok I think this is a sign it's time for me to go, I disappoint myself
Its ok anon, you can google what vagueness or heuristics means.
>If you had to choose which of these 2 options more closely describes this statement, which would you choose
>But... Neither one describes it perfectly?
>Ok but which is closer
>But....Neither... describes it??? Perfectly???? I don't???? Understand?????????
Holy kek anon didja have breakfast yesterday?
I did choose one though. Perhaps you should read more carefully.
>Getting upset about things that weren't even said just because you can imagine in a reality where they were said
Kek it's not getting any better for you
Are these upset people in the room with us anon?
t.
>sexual communism bad
>financial communism good
communism bad
Yes because society tells me so
communism good
Yes because society tells me so
I joke pls ma'am pls no get mad ma'am I only block your screen for a moment ma'am to clean varus pls no angry
>history and academic literature reads like what an incel would say
topk3k
>somebody who buys into the rethoric that the only reason women dont want him is because of things he has no control over whatsoever
Why would men become so undesirable over recent years? Wasn't society(and men) supposed to be more civilized? Why rate of single motherhood increasing if women apparently are vetting men much harsher while also apparently there still plenty of men who (still) have good jobs and are single? I heard women are starting to out-earn men financially, but men did marry poorer women since always, so for sake of equality the reverse should happen, too.
Some woman can look at a man right in the eye while he's balls deep inside of him and still call him an incel because he insulted one common quality of women
Kinda, but you're being a bit disingenuous in this instance. I'm not even sure why the argument turned in this direction, all I did was point out something I thought was inconsistent. I wasn't necessarily calling him one.
>No you see I wasnt calling HIIIIIM that thing I used as an insult while looking and pointing at him, I just like, was just like, saying man, I mean I was just like, just saying yknow, just saying is all, I'm just saying
Man I hated that cope back on the playground in middle school and I still hate it now
Just admit you were wrong you actual child
>tfw it's another women poorly larping as men episode
kek I love these threads
I've never seen anybody use chud outside of Cinemaphile.
Certain twitch streamers use it all the time
Pack of hyenas plus only male left plus lion hierarchies.
That's a lot of replies for something that is perfectly explained in the movie. Then again, as expected the replies aren't even about the movie, but it's okay. Inane off-topic drivel is allowed and encouraged as long as you don't say that you want to frick the lion because that's where the line was drawn for some reason.
A lot of these people sound angry the lion wouldnt want to frick them
Lionesses still need a reliable source of dicking.
Even if they disliked him, he was still the legitimate king as far as their own logic of how kingship should work. If they really wanted to be rid of him, they just needed to invite another, fitter male lion to take over.
>all this back and forth
Women roll with the winners. Scar won. Then Simba won. They survived at least three regimes by chilling in a harem and letting cards change hands. It works in the cartoon and it works in real life. As a man if you take problem with this then it's your fault for losing a fight in the first place. Simple as.
Works for lions, but not for advanced human societies that require peace and men believing in the system.
Sounds like a thing only utterly deranged barbarians would be capable of doing.
>Sounds like a thing only utterly deranged barbarians would be capable of doing.
You think that's bad, wait until you hear they demand their vassal states molest their infant sons in tribute to the glory of their God
>Sounds like a thing only utterly deranged barbarians would be capable of doing.
The only reason humanity stopped doing that was because world leaders found slavery and eventually wage slavery to be more lucrative and capable of keeping rebellions in check. Same shit in a different outfit.
If women are weak, explain this:
Look at the eyes on that bawd
She wants them, she's just playing cause she wants to take all three of em
she's holding it in an angle
Show this to those morons that think they could beat a lion
>didn't launch forwards when they let go
>stopper knot didn't hit the fence
If they were actually in a tug of war, the lioness' teeth would have been ripped out because teeth are made for cutting (or in the case of herbivores, grinding), not gripping.
So... why haven't women statistically gone down with their countries throughout human history? I want to disagree with incel anon but this does kind of bug me.
>So like, why IS grass green? I wanna disagree with biology and say it's not, but it's sounding kinda right idk :
It is, anon, it just is
Why are you like this, Cinemaphile?
Are you not?
Remember that fanart that depicted Scar teaching Simba how to suck human wiener?
He had an army of nazi hyenas
fun fact, lions are pretty shitty hunters. Spotted hyenas wreck them in success rates. Meanwhile painted dogs have a near 100% success rate for hunts and only held back from ruling Africa by their size. But the most successful and deadly hunter in Africa are sand cats.
cute! I bet they hunt lots of sand
>But the most successful and deadly hunter in Africa are sand cats.
It only hunts small animals and shit. By this logic a lizard hunting worms is also a very successeful hunter.
How is it even remotelly to compare it to lions, who have to throw themselves at buffalos?
>success and deadliness is how many times you catch your prey!
>success and deadliness is the deadliness of your prey!
That's not how nature works at all
Everything in nature is a success
It'd be extinct if it wasn't
>That's not how nature works at all
>Everything in nature is a success
>It'd be extinct if it wasn't
Ok by this logic lions are better because they're the top of the food chain. While sand cats have a lot of predators.
They're all women and can't run a Pride.
Mufasa almost got his son killed because he forgot to tell him his real killer was Scar.
wouldn't it make more sense to use Timon?
he'd be the best, like shooting your hot sticky load inside an old sock