I hated this because nothing would happen to Mills. No judge would have thrown the book at a detective for shooting John Doe who is a notorious, insane serial killer and just killed a pregnant woman horrifically like the rest of his victims. Mille would have gotten paid time off and John Doe would be burning in Hell and being made Satan’s sex slave
The whole thing makes no sense, who punishes Mills? If he doesn't die, he isn't punished for his sin which isn't even a sin he really bad but was spurred in him. The ending absolutely destroys the whole movie but no one notices because they're dumb and go "HAA WHAT IS IN THE BOX"
I hated this because nothing would happen to Mills. No judge would have thrown the book at a detective for shooting John Doe who is a notorious, insane serial killer and just killed a pregnant woman horrifically like the rest of his victims. Mille would have gotten paid time off and John Doe would be burning in Hell and being made Satan’s sex slave
I think Fincher makes really intense thrillers but you kind of just have to go with the emotion of the scenes rather than the logic sometimes.
Like I love The Game, but the ending doesn't really make much sense if you think about it too much, but it's a great character ending for the protagonist.
>no repercussions would of happened to mills
his wife is dead, and was horrifically murdered with his unborn child. yeah, go on, tell him "its cool bro you wont go to jail, its all gravy from here on out!". will murdering john doe make him feel a bit better? sure. bet that makes his wife and child being murdered a-ok!
This, the ending is garbage shock bait. It destroys the movie completely. Plus, making Doe's speech in the car completely pointless because why include that if he's just le crazy anyway. Of course, can't have the audience pondering on the degeneracy of their society in any way shape or form.
this faux-Christian belief held by most whites is the zionists ultimate tool of subversion. We are controlled by the dopamine we receive when acting "selflessly"
Whites sacrifice themselves to satiate the social zeitgeist and be externally lauded as "moral"
>Oh, I’m not gonna kill you, but trust me, after I’m through with you, you’re gonna be wishing I had >Mills, no, don’t do it! >BOOM HERE COMES THE BOOM starts playing as Granny steps out of the squad car and walks slowly yet menacingly to John Doe
When you are suddenly born in this time you often don't have a sense of the development of human civilisation.
Mills being vengeful and vigilante, we all used to do that forever, until we collectively thoughr maybe that's not the way if we want to forward humanity, if we want to evolve in a civilised fashion. Before the state it was barbarism, then the state took over the barbarity, until wise heads said yeah, it shouldn't do that. That's why civilised places don't have the death penalty. The state shouldn't decide who lives and dies in that way.
The detective as an enforcer of the state shouldn't either.
We don't get that humans have tried all this stuff and it doesn't work well. It wasn't long ago we used to have duels, which were outlawed because the consequences are shit. We are a part of forwarding humanity.
I love when anti death penalty gays use this as the only metric to determine if a country is civilized or not by this logic Mexico and Zambia are just better to live in overall than say, Japan *huffs farts*
This is one of those motifs that writers made up and decided was based that I have never seen pulled off. It's always a strange moral copout.
It's meant to moralize and be a grandiose moral conundrum for the purpose of drama. In real life, obviously this is batshit crazy logic.
>if you kill a killer, the amount of killers in the world remains the same
What if I kill a rapis?
not if youre already a killer before
>be a killer
>kill a killer
>2-1=2
HMM?
Then who was kill???
Brad's acting in this scene was legitimately awful.
I hated this because nothing would happen to Mills. No judge would have thrown the book at a detective for shooting John Doe who is a notorious, insane serial killer and just killed a pregnant woman horrifically like the rest of his victims. Mille would have gotten paid time off and John Doe would be burning in Hell and being made Satan’s sex slave
The whole thing makes no sense, who punishes Mills? If he doesn't die, he isn't punished for his sin which isn't even a sin he really bad but was spurred in him. The ending absolutely destroys the whole movie but no one notices because they're dumb and go "HAA WHAT IS IN THE BOX"
I think Fincher makes really intense thrillers but you kind of just have to go with the emotion of the scenes rather than the logic sometimes.
Like I love The Game, but the ending doesn't really make much sense if you think about it too much, but it's a great character ending for the protagonist.
>cops should be allowed to play judge, jury and executioner.
>no repercussions would of happened to mills
his wife is dead, and was horrifically murdered with his unborn child. yeah, go on, tell him "its cool bro you wont go to jail, its all gravy from here on out!". will murdering john doe make him feel a bit better? sure. bet that makes his wife and child being murdered a-ok!
John Doe should've been pride
Plus Pitt should've killed himself, as all other 6 sins were killed, that was the point
This, the ending is garbage shock bait. It destroys the movie completely. Plus, making Doe's speech in the car completely pointless because why include that if he's just le crazy anyway. Of course, can't have the audience pondering on the degeneracy of their society in any way shape or form.
>go to jail
>”hah, what now”
>John Doe has the upper hand. If you kill him, he wins.
>Morgan Freeman looks into camera
>What do YOU think should happen, Anon?
Sommerset should have killed Doe himself.
this faux-Christian belief held by most whites is the zionists ultimate tool of subversion. We are controlled by the dopamine we receive when acting "selflessly"
Whites sacrifice themselves to satiate the social zeitgeist and be externally lauded as "moral"
>if you kill your enemies they win
it's true though. look at Patrick Bateman's enemies who he killed. They all won.
>Oh, I’m not gonna kill you, but trust me, after I’m through with you, you’re gonna be wishing I had
>Mills, no, don’t do it!
>BOOM HERE COMES THE BOOM starts playing as Granny steps out of the squad car and walks slowly yet menacingly to John Doe
When you are suddenly born in this time you often don't have a sense of the development of human civilisation.
Mills being vengeful and vigilante, we all used to do that forever, until we collectively thoughr maybe that's not the way if we want to forward humanity, if we want to evolve in a civilised fashion. Before the state it was barbarism, then the state took over the barbarity, until wise heads said yeah, it shouldn't do that. That's why civilised places don't have the death penalty. The state shouldn't decide who lives and dies in that way.
The detective as an enforcer of the state shouldn't either.
We don't get that humans have tried all this stuff and it doesn't work well. It wasn't long ago we used to have duels, which were outlawed because the consequences are shit. We are a part of forwarding humanity.
>forwarding humanity
Gay pride parades and gender affirming clinics are truly great steps forward.
I love when anti death penalty gays use this as the only metric to determine if a country is civilized or not by this logic Mexico and Zambia are just better to live in overall than say, Japan *huffs farts*
Of course it isn't the only metric, and it won't civilize a place on its own, why you make up stuff?
upvoted
Never understood this. They'll be dead and I'll be alive, i don't care how much cope you want to tell me but its not gonna change