Anyone betting at that point would cause everyone else to fold. There's no right play, the autistic number crunchers only limped in because they had Aces or a King and they caught nothing so they're not going to stay in the pot no matter what came on the turn and river or what Damon did.
Yeah, no shit.
If you figure out how to win, the casinos won't take your action and they don't let you play. But they have to offer blackjack because what the hell kind of casino doesn't have blackjack?
I remember in the early-mid 2000s watching world poker tour with my mom and some guy had that happen in an early knockout round, he needed 1 specific card to save him from elimination during an all-in, and he got it and then went on to win the entire tournament..Guy seemed like he was getting outplayed in the finals but luck was going his way more than the other guys way
>play slightly not by the book every single hand >this destroys the degenerate gambler man
It's literally a game about bluffing but you gays go >n-no, you can't bluff like that
She didn't know how to play and she was trying to bluff or she even legitimately didn't know what she had. But "WHY WOULD YOU EVER PLAY IT LIKE THAT?" had this "pro" legitimately concerned she had eyes on his hand fricking xd, gamblegays are so mindbroken
Jesus, why are women so fricking cowardly. I wish I had known then when I was a teenager. They wouldn't have bullied and probably wanted to frick me instead.
I remember when this clip went viral. I don’t remember the exact hands they had, but for anyone who knows anything about poker rules, she was just a dumbass woman who got lucky and made a moronic call with the dumbest hand possible which baffled the other guy, and millions of people were trying to decipher whether she was actually a genius, or was cheating. But I sincerely just believe she is a dumb woman who got lucky. It still pisses me off how she was trying explain herself afterwards with bullshit like “i knew you were bluffing i read you”. Why didn’t everyone just admit that she was a dumb woman and
move on and make such a ridiculous exaggeration on the whole situation? God I hate prostitutes so much, this whole thing made me so mad
No genius would call with J high. Even if you knew the other guy was bluffing, he could very likely be holding a higher card, so it's just a massive gamble.
Cuz it makes ZERO sense to go ALL IN with a ducking JACK HIGH. Even if you know the opponent is bluffing, there’s like a 90% chance you still lose with a terrible hand like Jack and a three. The guy sort of knew he would lose, just wanted to bluff with a shitty hand to win a small pot, because it’s not such a big deal to him that he was almost messing around at that point.
You can see in his face when he lost the hand, he was just laughing it off because how weak his hand was (8, 7) so he obviously was going to lose, unless the opponent fell for the bluff. His smile disappeared into a look of pure shock as soon as he saw the dumbest hand possible on the woman, his brain literally trying to register what the hell he just witnessed. The worst part is after a while he asks what the hell happened and why she played that hand, and she answered extremely condescendingly stuff like “You let me do this to yourself through your bluffing you know that right, I totally read you” as if she isn’t a total moron woman. Her only retort was “I thought you had a Ace high” to which he replied “So why go all in with a Jack high” and she completely dodged the question going back to her previous arguments like “I read you, I was testing you”. Like it is so painfully obvious that she is a stupid woman who knows little to nothing about poker and got incredibly lucky, but almost all the comments online full of morons are trying to figure out whether she’s a genius or cheated, and they just refuse to see the obvious answer for some reason. The whole thing makes me so mad that I wrote a whole paragraph just now, and I completely forgot about it until I just came into this thread.
>Makes ZERO sense >Still wins the hand
That's what happens when you play cards. It's a gamble.
I remember when this clip went viral. I don’t remember the exact hands they had, but for anyone who knows anything about poker rules, she was just a dumbass woman who got lucky and made a moronic call with the dumbest hand possible which baffled the other guy, and millions of people were trying to decipher whether she was actually a genius, or was cheating. But I sincerely just believe she is a dumb woman who got lucky. It still pisses me off how she was trying explain herself afterwards with bullshit like “i knew you were bluffing i read you”. Why didn’t everyone just admit that she was a dumb woman and
move on and make such a ridiculous exaggeration on the whole situation? God I hate prostitutes so much, this whole thing made me so mad
?si=8v1HFJo2RQTrid7x
I don't get it, she got lucky, why is he seething so much? Doesn't shit happen? He seems like an autistic competitive fighting game player who got beat by someone who was fricking around and trolling, why is he being so soft about it?
Cuz it makes ZERO sense to go ALL IN with a ducking JACK HIGH. Even if you know the opponent is bluffing, there’s like a 90% chance you still lose with a terrible hand like Jack and a three. The guy sort of knew he would lose, just wanted to bluff with a shitty hand to win a small pot, because it’s not such a big deal to him that he was almost messing around at that point.
You can see in his face when he lost the hand, he was just laughing it off because how weak his hand was (8, 7) so he obviously was going to lose, unless the opponent fell for the bluff. His smile disappeared into a look of pure shock as soon as he saw the dumbest hand possible on the woman, his brain literally trying to register what the hell he just witnessed. The worst part is after a while he asks what the hell happened and why she played that hand, and she answered extremely condescendingly stuff like “You let me do this to yourself through your bluffing you know that right, I totally read you” as if she isn’t a total moron woman. Her only retort was “I thought you had a Ace high” to which he replied “So why go all in with a Jack high” and she completely dodged the question going back to her previous arguments like “I read you, I was testing you”. Like it is so painfully obvious that she is a stupid woman who knows little to nothing about poker and got incredibly lucky, but almost all the comments online full of morons are trying to figure out whether she’s a genius or cheated, and they just refuse to see the obvious answer for some reason. The whole thing makes me so mad that I wrote a whole paragraph just now, and I completely forgot about it until I just came into this thread.
>it makes ZERO sense to go ALL IN with a ducking JACK HIGH
It doesn't make zero sense, but the only way it makes sense, is if the woman knew Garrett's exact hand. The flop is 10 10 9; If Garrett continues on that board, it's entirely possible that he has 7 8 (he did have this) or Q J, which she can't even beat. That means the only way her call was good, is if she knew his exact hand, which isn't really possible. Garrett could have a 10, or he could have an ace, or he could have Queen high, which she can't beat. She won, but it wasn't a good call. Garrett was clearly tilted by the fact that it was a stupid call.
even if she knew his hand she wasn't favored when she called. shes just an idiot. really dont understand why everyone thought she cheated. that would be a horrible spot to take if youre cheating
This is what I don't get. Theres nothing cool or competitive about the guy being floored by a stupid play. He was seething uncontrollably, like she mindraped him and his methedology by, again, being dumb and getting lucky. Why not chalk it up to her misreading her card and getting lucky, or her just making a bad play and doubling down? Jesus grow some thicker skin, call her an idiot and move on. He could have laughed it off saying "you wont get lucky like that again" or something, instead he lost complete control over himself. If I ever played against this guy at a table I'd just keep bringing that play up over and over to trigger him, like come on guy.
3 months ago
Anonymous
hes a massive loser and that hissy fit wasn't the end. he quit playing poker and deleted his twitter for like 6 months before he came back to twitter with a long comeback post about how his reputation was ruined even though he was the victim
DAMN STAIGHT
if he had gotten a six of clubs or a jack of clubs it wouldve been OVER
the fact he didnt get anymore clubs in the deck after seeing 4 of the clubs on the table IS RIGGED
i've bluffed my way to taking the pot before. had jack shit. lied through my teeth. poker is one of the only games where you can win without having the proper setup to technically "win".
I'm guessing he lives near Shreveport since it's right near the western border and has a few sizeable casinos. I'd save up for Vegas though. If you live near a major airport, flights to Vegas are dirt cheap.
Yea, he should have bet. The pot is nice to win, but they eventually folded anyway. By the end he has someone else playing and doesn't raise even at that point. This is dumb. He has a full house, one of the highest hands. Trying to play safe and not bet costs you. He wins no matter what and if the other guy folds Damon still wins the same amount. He should have gone all in by the end. At the flop 3 cards, depends how he'd bee playing maybe they'd have gone for it.
High stakes gambling makes you really fricking nervous. It's why whenever you saw it in Mafia media, everyone was drinking and smoking. It wasn't for fun, because why would you inebriate yourself in a strategic mental game? It is too deal with the stress. You can't smoke indoors anymore and a lot of TV shows won't let you drink, so they resort to fiddling. It's the same reason recovering drug addicts wear a rubber band around their wrist which they snap all day, to keep their minds occupied.
Thanks anon I hadn't thought of this, my mind immediately went to either it being a psych trick or some celeb gimmick. Gambling sounds fun, I'd try it if I had any money.
Mind games. People try to read your actions and interpret them in various ways. Think geopolitics. How simple actions send a message one way or another.
It can be so much fun when your personality contrasts in your favor against a tricky but ultimately weaker opponent that you proceed take to the cleaners. Mind you, I've only ever played online. I would be very nervous to play live as cold-blooded as I have sometimes played against a real human. You never know who you're dealing with. You could get shot.
Figuring out what the opponent has based on his betting pattern while also manipulating what he thinks you have by strategically adapting your own betting pattern.
Funnily enough one thing good players find annoying is playing against bad players because their betting patterns are often completely random so they could have anything on every hand. Obviously they still lose in the long run but pro-players can lose their shit from time to time because their opponent won a hand with some insane play.
>you could not have won fairly, for i am a man better than you, a woman
for example resulted in the woman with jack high, which is one of the worst hands imaginable. The guy got so assblasted he called her a cheater and made her pay him back the money. The reality is that she's probably not a very good poker player and made a stupid bet that happened to work out.
Zero skill. It's 100% luck and remembering.
You don't play your cards.
You play the other people at the table. >What will cause THEM to bet MORE? >THAT'S what I should do.
If you're lucky, and you get what you know is a "winning hand," you can more safely play riskier bets.
Anybody got the clip where some guy calls Phil with bad cards and the commentator says "meltdown in 3, 2, 1..."? So many of my favorite poker clips are gone from youtube.
How much money could I make being an expressionless mute autistic man, if I memorize the entire game theory optimal table, and played the entire game according to the game theory optimal table?
Why did Seidel get a 1% when he's got nothing but Wilson and Mecs both got high card? Also, why would you go all in with two cards left? You gotta draw out those betting rounds.
the other two players have aces so the chances of two aces on river and turn are lower than 2 kings
a single ace wont help either of the other two players
>the other two players have aces so the chances of two aces on river and turn are lower than 2 kings
If the people holding aces have 0%, it means one of the last two aces isn't in the deck (it was held by another player and discarded), so running aces isn't possible. The person holding a king can still win because both kings are in the deck.
Why did Seidel get a 1% when he's got nothing but Wilson and Mecs both got high card? Also, why would you go all in with two cards left? You gotta draw out those betting rounds.
If the last two cards are two kings, Seidel would win with a better full house.
[...]
I don't get it, she got lucky, why is he seething so much? Doesn't shit happen? He seems like an autistic competitive fighting game player who got beat by someone who was fricking around and trolling, why is he being so soft about it?
>why is he being so soft about it?
There's a lot of reasons. >Garrett plays for a living >she's a woman >there was a Poker legend at the table who saw what happened
>the other two players have aces so the chances of two aces on river and turn are lower than 2 kings
If the people holding aces have 0%, it means one of the last two aces isn't in the deck (it was held by another player and discarded), so running aces isn't possible. The person holding a king can still win because both kings are in the deck.
[...]
If the last two cards are two kings, Seidel would win with a better full house.
[...] >why is he being so soft about it?
There's a lot of reasons. >Garrett plays for a living >she's a woman >there was a Poker legend at the table who saw what happened
I didn't account for what's already showing. Thanks bros.
No problem. Your final hand in Poker is your 2 cards + any combination of the 5 on the board. There's two 10s, so Seidel could win with 10 10 K K K - explaining the 1%.
And now everyone thinks you have 3 10's and folds. Good job
>winning the pot is bad
winning the pot is good
playing the table into throwing more money into the pot you are about to win is better
fortune favors the bold, my friend
Anyone betting at that point would cause everyone else to fold. There's no right play, the autistic number crunchers only limped in because they had Aces or a King and they caught nothing so they're not going to stay in the pot no matter what came on the turn and river or what Damon did.
What if he had nothing?
If Damon has nothing what would the others have? Aces high? That's not a winning hand.
there are still two cards on the table
sometimes it's easy to bluff when pairs turn up on the flop
>you could not have won fairly, for i am a man better than you, a woman
Anyone have the webm of the guy playing and he calls, loses the hand, and he's already disappeared from the chair? Makes me laugh each time.
Gambling is the ultimate cuck. Every single gambler I know loses a ton of money but can't stop showing up to lose more money.
Yeah, no shit.
If you figure out how to win, the casinos won't take your action and they don't let you play. But they have to offer blackjack because what the hell kind of casino doesn't have blackjack?
No, what happens is he thinks he's losing the hand, then he hits the one exact card he needs and disappears from the chair.
ONE
CARD
ONE FRICKING CARD
IN THE ENTIRE DECK
I remember in the early-mid 2000s watching world poker tour with my mom and some guy had that happen in an early knockout round, he needed 1 specific card to save him from elimination during an all-in, and he got it and then went on to win the entire tournament..Guy seemed like he was getting outplayed in the finals but luck was going his way more than the other guys way
theres only 52 cards in a deck. play long enough and nothing will faze you.
that 9 culled him out of existence
H-hiyai..
ALL BETS IS CLOSED
do you actually bet and win with real money on those live stream casino things?
i think it depends on the site but yes, most of the time you can
if you don't want people to think you're cheating don't play like a cheater
>play slightly not by the book every single hand
>this destroys the degenerate gambler man
It's literally a game about bluffing but you gays go
>n-no, you can't bluff like that
She didn't know how to play and she was trying to bluff or she even legitimately didn't know what she had. But "WHY WOULD YOU EVER PLAY IT LIKE THAT?" had this "pro" legitimately concerned she had eyes on his hand fricking xd, gamblegays are so mindbroken
she gave the money back. Whether she cheated or not, her female instinct gave into pressure. Not unlike George winning a hand by mimicking a baby
>she gave the money back.
Jesus, why are women so fricking cowardly. I wish I had known then when I was a teenager. They wouldn't have bullied and probably wanted to frick me instead.
I remember when this clip went viral. I don’t remember the exact hands they had, but for anyone who knows anything about poker rules, she was just a dumbass woman who got lucky and made a moronic call with the dumbest hand possible which baffled the other guy, and millions of people were trying to decipher whether she was actually a genius, or was cheating. But I sincerely just believe she is a dumb woman who got lucky. It still pisses me off how she was trying explain herself afterwards with bullshit like “i knew you were bluffing i read you”. Why didn’t everyone just admit that she was a dumb woman and
move on and make such a ridiculous exaggeration on the whole situation? God I hate prostitutes so much, this whole thing made me so mad
?si=8v1HFJo2RQTrid7x
No genius would call with J high. Even if you knew the other guy was bluffing, he could very likely be holding a higher card, so it's just a massive gamble.
>Makes ZERO sense
>Still wins the hand
That's what happens when you play cards. It's a gamble.
>gamble
poker... is gambling... now that's crazy
?si=8v1HFJo2RQTrid7x
This is just a professional misreading her cards and being too embarrassed to admit it
Are you really calling her a professional? Tell me where you've seen her play that isn't Hustler. She's not a pro at all.
Learn to read, moron.
Thanks for the low quality reply. You can reply again after I've filtered the thread. Learn to eat my shit, Black person.
She did nothing wrong and Garrett was a b***h who fricked up.
I don't get it, she got lucky, why is he seething so much? Doesn't shit happen? He seems like an autistic competitive fighting game player who got beat by someone who was fricking around and trolling, why is he being so soft about it?
Cuz it makes ZERO sense to go ALL IN with a ducking JACK HIGH. Even if you know the opponent is bluffing, there’s like a 90% chance you still lose with a terrible hand like Jack and a three. The guy sort of knew he would lose, just wanted to bluff with a shitty hand to win a small pot, because it’s not such a big deal to him that he was almost messing around at that point.
You can see in his face when he lost the hand, he was just laughing it off because how weak his hand was (8, 7) so he obviously was going to lose, unless the opponent fell for the bluff. His smile disappeared into a look of pure shock as soon as he saw the dumbest hand possible on the woman, his brain literally trying to register what the hell he just witnessed. The worst part is after a while he asks what the hell happened and why she played that hand, and she answered extremely condescendingly stuff like “You let me do this to yourself through your bluffing you know that right, I totally read you” as if she isn’t a total moron woman. Her only retort was “I thought you had a Ace high” to which he replied “So why go all in with a Jack high” and she completely dodged the question going back to her previous arguments like “I read you, I was testing you”. Like it is so painfully obvious that she is a stupid woman who knows little to nothing about poker and got incredibly lucky, but almost all the comments online full of morons are trying to figure out whether she’s a genius or cheated, and they just refuse to see the obvious answer for some reason. The whole thing makes me so mad that I wrote a whole paragraph just now, and I completely forgot about it until I just came into this thread.
>it makes ZERO sense to go ALL IN with a ducking JACK HIGH
It doesn't make zero sense, but the only way it makes sense, is if the woman knew Garrett's exact hand. The flop is 10 10 9; If Garrett continues on that board, it's entirely possible that he has 7 8 (he did have this) or Q J, which she can't even beat. That means the only way her call was good, is if she knew his exact hand, which isn't really possible. Garrett could have a 10, or he could have an ace, or he could have Queen high, which she can't beat. She won, but it wasn't a good call. Garrett was clearly tilted by the fact that it was a stupid call.
even if she knew his hand she wasn't favored when she called. shes just an idiot. really dont understand why everyone thought she cheated. that would be a horrible spot to take if youre cheating
This is what I don't get. Theres nothing cool or competitive about the guy being floored by a stupid play. He was seething uncontrollably, like she mindraped him and his methedology by, again, being dumb and getting lucky. Why not chalk it up to her misreading her card and getting lucky, or her just making a bad play and doubling down? Jesus grow some thicker skin, call her an idiot and move on. He could have laughed it off saying "you wont get lucky like that again" or something, instead he lost complete control over himself. If I ever played against this guy at a table I'd just keep bringing that play up over and over to trigger him, like come on guy.
hes a massive loser and that hissy fit wasn't the end. he quit playing poker and deleted his twitter for like 6 months before he came back to twitter with a long comeback post about how his reputation was ruined even though he was the victim
DAMN STAIGHT
if he had gotten a six of clubs or a jack of clubs it wouldve been OVER
the fact he didnt get anymore clubs in the deck after seeing 4 of the clubs on the table IS RIGGED
>it makes ZERO sense to go ALL IN with a ducking JACK HIGH
what about king high?
Let it go Garrett
here,you forgot your picture you fricking loser
When you lose HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS of YOUR MONEY in literal seconds by "pretending..."
...you get very upset.
I hate that ugly closeted gay israelite
Can a non-incel tell me if she won legitimately or if she cheated?
She just got lucky and Adelstein was butthurt about it.
WSOP2023 torrent when?
frick bros, i need to stop playing poker. i loose too much money. BUT I LOVE PLAYING CARDS WHY DO THE CARDS BECKON ME?
You're addicted to losing.
lol i guess. i've hit big before. feels better than pure uncut cocaine. i can't even describe the rush. 100% an addiction tho.
Just play it without money, silly.
fake money poker is pointless. Even with pennies the game is instantly more enjoyable.
Then that's your answer. Lower your stakes or prepare to get felted to infinity. Don't you practice bankroll management?
That ace could not have helped you.
i've bluffed my way to taking the pot before. had jack shit. lied through my teeth. poker is one of the only games where you can win without having the proper setup to technically "win".
Yeah, obviously. In poker, cards are like the fourth most important thing
And for the record, Matt played the hand just fine
Doesn't get much better than flopping a boat. Gotta slow play that shit though to get max value.
>*crying baby noises*
he's George IRL, shit
Does this actually work
Yes, apparently.
Yes, even babies on TV can make their boobs hurt when they are nursing.
George was well-versed in KGB psychological warfare.
Alpha move
she shouldnt have been leaking milk everywhere like some disgusting cow then
dude that noise is genuinely creepy, what a weirdo
breasts or gtfo
Kek based George
?si=xn12kgF2smjSkyxE
>[Baby Noises]
who wins
i'd fold if she stared me down as well
rare waman w, can't deny it
I want to gamble and im right near Louisiana or should I save up for Vegas?
which part of louisiana
I'm guessing he lives near Shreveport since it's right near the western border and has a few sizeable casinos. I'd save up for Vegas though. If you live near a major airport, flights to Vegas are dirt cheap.
card counter
any game with phil and tony is pure Cinemaphile kino
But you lied!
I laugh every time I see this and >I check threads but I’ve never actually seen the original video. QRD?
Yea, he should have bet. The pot is nice to win, but they eventually folded anyway. By the end he has someone else playing and doesn't raise even at that point. This is dumb. He has a full house, one of the highest hands. Trying to play safe and not bet costs you. He wins no matter what and if the other guy folds Damon still wins the same amount. He should have gone all in by the end. At the flop 3 cards, depends how he'd bee playing maybe they'd have gone for it.
for me it's this guy
once twink death happened to him, he was never the same.
He looks like gollum now
>Of course I lied Phil it's poker
I dont even know how to play poker but that was funny.
>I think you should retire
Phil is so easy to tilt. Only Negreanu blows him up better than Tony G.
That rattling from the poker chips is obnoxious, tf audio engineers doing
>9 minutes of greasy scumbags playing with cards
Yeah I'm not watching
It's K I N O
LMFAO I can't believe the balls
Phil = Cinemaphile posters
why are they always fiddling with their chips? Is the noise meant to shake the opponent or something?
High stakes gambling makes you really fricking nervous. It's why whenever you saw it in Mafia media, everyone was drinking and smoking. It wasn't for fun, because why would you inebriate yourself in a strategic mental game? It is too deal with the stress. You can't smoke indoors anymore and a lot of TV shows won't let you drink, so they resort to fiddling. It's the same reason recovering drug addicts wear a rubber band around their wrist which they snap all day, to keep their minds occupied.
Thanks anon I hadn't thought of this, my mind immediately went to either it being a psych trick or some celeb gimmick. Gambling sounds fun, I'd try it if I had any money.
kek how can professional players have the same bullshit arguments I do when playing
Elite clip
tony g is a boss
>no items
>fox only
>final destination
meanwhile
>*casually throws pokeball*
>gg no re
People really are the same no matter what they do
i never played poker but it looks to me like the only actions you can do is bet
where does the skill element come in?
Mind games. People try to read your actions and interpret them in various ways. Think geopolitics. How simple actions send a message one way or another.
It can be so much fun when your personality contrasts in your favor against a tricky but ultimately weaker opponent that you proceed take to the cleaners. Mind you, I've only ever played online. I would be very nervous to play live as cold-blooded as I have sometimes played against a real human. You never know who you're dealing with. You could get shot.
Figuring out what the opponent has based on his betting pattern while also manipulating what he thinks you have by strategically adapting your own betting pattern.
Funnily enough one thing good players find annoying is playing against bad players because their betting patterns are often completely random so they could have anything on every hand. Obviously they still lose in the long run but pro-players can lose their shit from time to time because their opponent won a hand with some insane play.
for example resulted in the woman with jack high, which is one of the worst hands imaginable. The guy got so assblasted he called her a cheater and made her pay him back the money. The reality is that she's probably not a very good poker player and made a stupid bet that happened to work out.
you don't play the cards. you play the man.
Zero skill. It's 100% luck and remembering.
You don't play your cards.
You play the other people at the table.
>What will cause THEM to bet MORE?
>THAT'S what I should do.
If you're lucky, and you get what you know is a "winning hand," you can more safely play riskier bets.
Anybody got the clip where some guy calls Phil with bad cards and the commentator says "meltdown in 3, 2, 1..."? So many of my favorite poker clips are gone from youtube.
judging by this guys outbursts I thought he was just an average salty high ego player but he is actually the highest earing player ever?
I don't know about highest earning, but he has more WSOP bracelets than anyone else by a solid margin.
Foldsville
I don't know anything about poker, am I missing something ?
he jumped the gun with too strong of a bet which scares away the action
jig the lure
when you get a nibble
wait for the bite
then give a big yank, set the hook
reel it in
>fishin'
How much money could I make being an expressionless mute autistic man, if I memorize the entire game theory optimal table, and played the entire game according to the game theory optimal table?
Depends on how deep your pockets are now, and how big your testes are.
The good players are just nerdy kids who play just like you described, but have deep enough pockets so they can survive bad runs.
Frick. I would melt down 100% if I lost my shit. What's the most you ever lost in a match, anon?
Why are Japs so bad-mannered in gambling?
>country of seething incels
>Odds are 1/2.7 billion
Holy shit
>Odds are 1/2.7 billion
Card games are always like that. Many such cases
frick me, running that's HOT
I love how disinterested he acts too, like this is the least interesting hand to him in the history of poker.
Why did Seidel get a 1% when he's got nothing but Wilson and Mecs both got high card? Also, why would you go all in with two cards left? You gotta draw out those betting rounds.
the other two players have aces so the chances of two aces on river and turn are lower than 2 kings
a single ace wont help either of the other two players
>the other two players have aces so the chances of two aces on river and turn are lower than 2 kings
If the people holding aces have 0%, it means one of the last two aces isn't in the deck (it was held by another player and discarded), so running aces isn't possible. The person holding a king can still win because both kings are in the deck.
If the last two cards are two kings, Seidel would win with a better full house.
>why is he being so soft about it?
There's a lot of reasons.
>Garrett plays for a living
>she's a woman
>there was a Poker legend at the table who saw what happened
I didn't account for what's already showing. Thanks bros.
No problem. Your final hand in Poker is your 2 cards + any combination of the 5 on the board. There's two 10s, so Seidel could win with 10 10 K K K - explaining the 1%.
phil is a manbaby
>I guess they never miss, huh?
>AJ you lost 50k playing go fish?!?
We're in a hand you need to shut the frick up.