oh you mean that being violently raped in the ass is... IRREVERSIBLE!!! DEEP
Time destroys everything, man, the worst pain and the greatest joy, it all gets turned to ashes by time and if you show events in reverse order a sad ending becomes a happy ending, really jogs the old noggin.
>if you chronologically reverse the movie it has a different meaning
uhm no
It's also a play on words, irreversible, as in cannot go backwards and yet the movie has an altered structure that actually sets the past in motion.
I expected better from Euro hours, fricking damn moron
What else is the point of showing the movie in reverse order and the conversation between the old people in the "beginning".
100% Noe wants to make some hamfisted comment about filmmaking.
If you just showed the movie in regular order it would just be a rape scene, she loses the babby, her bf goes to prison, their lives are irreversibly ruined.
But if you show it in reverse it ends with two lovers in bed, a cozy intimate setting, for them it's a happy end because they dont know what the next 48 hours will bring.
They're fates have been reversed.
no, it was a simple attempt to cash in on the success of Memento. Told in correct order the story is unremarkable, uninspired, cruel gore slop. It still that in backwards order, but with a little intrigue thrown in.
he was proud of it - it was the only way he could get the movie made - that and lying about the extend of the gore and extreme rape scene: >As an example, he [Noé] cited his experience getting financing for “Irreversible,” which he pitched as a story told in reverse order to capitalize on the popularity of Christopher Nolan’s “Memento” at the time. Additionally, while the film’s notorious rape scene does contain graphic imagery, he recalled telling financiers they had nothing to worry about. “They asked me, ‘So there’s explicit sex in the movie?'” he explained. “I said, ‘Of course not’…That’s how the movie was made.”
3 months ago
Anonymous
So he lied on both occasions?
And what about the dialogue at the start of the movie that is specifially about time destroying everything? Just coincidence?
3 months ago
Anonymous
Thrown in to sound deep - it's a simple fact
Noe is a cruel disgusting homosexual incapable of making art.
we have maybe hunreds of rape and revenge movies but you have problems only with the one that has a rape scene so exciting to you, your peepee got so hard, you can't see anything else about the movie
Time destroys everything, man, the worst pain and the greatest joy, it all gets turned to ashes by time and if you show events in reverse order a sad ending becomes a happy ending, really jogs the old noggin.
>"During the first sixty minutes of its running time, the film uses an extremely low-frequency sound of 27 Hz to create a state of nausea and anxiety in the audience, as it is not immediately perceptible to the spectator, but enough to evoke a physical response." >Imma make a movie that'll make people anxious and want to barf >Will that sell tickets? >Tickets?
>>Will that sell tickets?
Well you see this is where cultural differences come in play.
You have an American merchant brain and think everything is about profit.
Gaspar Noé even though he's not french, he has a french brain so he tries to make his movies incomprehensible and artsy in the name of l'art pour l'art
On a more serious note this is what I get from the movie:
gay people are demons;
gay clubs smell like shit;
caring for trans is wrong;
the rape is karma for having proposed anal sex to your woman;
gay and trans are subhuman psychopaths;
even the slightest contact with gay/trans ppl is utterly destructive for normal human beings.
Movies I like a lot are art ones that don't have clarity. Sometimes the movie is the top of the iceberg and the meaning is the submerged part you don't see, and don't really have a hope of knowing but you can sort of feel a meaning there like this picture. You can't articulate it but there's something worthwhile there, what I'm saying is its good when movies try to be like a weird painting
>Noé addressed the curious reception to his various films. While he has shrugged off criticism of the rape scene in “Irreversible” for years, he acknowledged its potential to yield problematic results. Noé said that when the film was released in Buenos Aires, his mother’s friend went to see it, and “the moment the rape scene started, the guy sitting next to her started jerking off. She missed the end of the movie. You don’t know how people will perceive the movie at the end of the tunnel. Psychos are everywhere.”
After watching a couple times, I looked further into it, and found out that the guy he kills at the beginning/end is the wrong guy. Couldn't catch that because the way the scenes are placed.
Is it possible that the man who walks in on the rape,and walks away, is the Ex-boyfriend ? He seems like he still resents her for dumping him.
No. That was literally the entire point. They wrote a rape scene and then created a movie around it. They just wanted to depict a rape in explicit detail because they're degenerate pieces of shit. It's the same with movies like I Spit On Your Grave, or Human Centipede. There was no plot or story written, the writer said, hey wouldn't it be fricked up to show a women getting beaten and raped... TWICE!... Or wouldn't it be funny if three people were forced to shit in each other's mouths. And then they created a movie AROUND their fricked up fetish.
>"During the first sixty minutes of its running time, the film uses an extremely low-frequency sound of 27 Hz to create a state of nausea and anxiety in the audience, as it is not immediately perceptible to the spectator, but enough to evoke a physical response." >Imma make a movie that'll make people anxious and want to barf >Will that sell tickets? >Tickets?
yes the point is to spread nihilism
the french are very sick fricks
Nobody cares, have a nice day and stop crying over movies, homosexual
3 months ago
Anonymous
>I'm so angry at anons on the intranest not agreeing with me urrrgghhhh
lol
3 months ago
Anonymous
You are the only one who is angry here. You come into a thread about a film you don't like, and then seethe over le degeneracy. I'm simply suggesting that you should have a nice day
3 months ago
Anonymous
>p-p-pretend to be calm... reply like your not a-a-a-ngry.... urrrggh
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Maybe if I type like a moronic (but le ironically), I will look like I'm actually not seething and projecting or something!
3 months ago
Anonymous
>ok, it's not working. But no matter what, have the last word. That means you won!
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Maybe if I b***h about le heckin' degenerate films on 4chinz, they will magically disappear or something! Also, everyone who thinks I'm moronic is actually mad or something!
by choosing the sex bomb that everyone wanted to frick in any othrr of her movies
yeah right, why hadn't she chose an uggo then? Noone would watch it? Yes
same story as bombshell, baiting with margot robbie to sell le >metoo
story
>be OP
>be gay and moronic
Take a hint, use the movie Title. Fricking dumbass
oh you mean that being violently raped in the ass is... IRREVERSIBLE!!! DEEP
>if you chronologically reverse the movie it has a different meaning
uhm no
It's also a play on words, irreversible, as in cannot go backwards and yet the movie has an altered structure that actually sets the past in motion.
I expected better from Euro hours, fricking damn moron
Funny story. I used to work at blockbuster and 90% of the time people didn’t rewind irreversible, likely thinking they couldn’t.
What else is the point of showing the movie in reverse order and the conversation between the old people in the "beginning".
100% Noe wants to make some hamfisted comment about filmmaking.
If you just showed the movie in regular order it would just be a rape scene, she loses the babby, her bf goes to prison, their lives are irreversibly ruined.
But if you show it in reverse it ends with two lovers in bed, a cozy intimate setting, for them it's a happy end because they dont know what the next 48 hours will bring.
They're fates have been reversed.
no, it was a simple attempt to cash in on the success of Memento. Told in correct order the story is unremarkable, uninspired, cruel gore slop. It still that in backwards order, but with a little intrigue thrown in.
Ok fine, go on believing that, see if I care.
he was proud of it - it was the only way he could get the movie made - that and lying about the extend of the gore and extreme rape scene:
>As an example, he [Noé] cited his experience getting financing for “Irreversible,” which he pitched as a story told in reverse order to capitalize on the popularity of Christopher Nolan’s “Memento” at the time. Additionally, while the film’s notorious rape scene does contain graphic imagery, he recalled telling financiers they had nothing to worry about. “They asked me, ‘So there’s explicit sex in the movie?'” he explained. “I said, ‘Of course not’…That’s how the movie was made.”
So he lied on both occasions?
And what about the dialogue at the start of the movie that is specifially about time destroying everything? Just coincidence?
Thrown in to sound deep - it's a simple fact
Noe is a cruel disgusting homosexual incapable of making art.
something something authors intent something
we have maybe hunreds of rape and revenge movies but you have problems only with the one that has a rape scene so exciting to you, your peepee got so hard, you can't see anything else about the movie
Time destroys everything, man, the worst pain and the greatest joy, it all gets turned to ashes by time and if you show events in reverse order a sad ending becomes a happy ending, really jogs the old noggin.
The title might give you a clue.
You are forgetting the fire extinguisher face crushing which was also kino
yeah it's absolutely kino but sorta in a funny way because at one point it begins to look like an '80s horror b-movie and it's edgy as frick
Have you watched it?
>"During the first sixty minutes of its running time, the film uses an extremely low-frequency sound of 27 Hz to create a state of nausea and anxiety in the audience, as it is not immediately perceptible to the spectator, but enough to evoke a physical response."
>Imma make a movie that'll make people anxious and want to barf
>Will that sell tickets?
>Tickets?
Go watch your marvelslop
>>Will that sell tickets?
Well you see this is where cultural differences come in play.
You have an American merchant brain and think everything is about profit.
Gaspar Noé even though he's not french, he has a french brain so he tries to make his movies incomprehensible and artsy in the name of l'art pour l'art
On a more serious note this is what I get from the movie:
gay people are demons;
gay clubs smell like shit;
caring for trans is wrong;
the rape is karma for having proposed anal sex to your woman;
gay and trans are subhuman psychopaths;
even the slightest contact with gay/trans ppl is utterly destructive for normal human beings.
Movies I like a lot are art ones that don't have clarity. Sometimes the movie is the top of the iceberg and the meaning is the submerged part you don't see, and don't really have a hope of knowing but you can sort of feel a meaning there like this picture. You can't articulate it but there's something worthwhile there, what I'm saying is its good when movies try to be like a weird painting
Wild at Heart.
>Noé addressed the curious reception to his various films. While he has shrugged off criticism of the rape scene in “Irreversible” for years, he acknowledged its potential to yield problematic results. Noé said that when the film was released in Buenos Aires, his mother’s friend went to see it, and “the moment the rape scene started, the guy sitting next to her started jerking off. She missed the end of the movie. You don’t know how people will perceive the movie at the end of the tunnel. Psychos are everywhere.”
After watching a couple times, I looked further into it, and found out that the guy he kills at the beginning/end is the wrong guy. Couldn't catch that because the way the scenes are placed.
Is it possible that the man who walks in on the rape,and walks away, is the Ex-boyfriend ? He seems like he still resents her for dumping him.
I think he's just an audience standin.
You think.
But do you know
yes the point is to spread nihilism
the french are very sick fricks
She would have been fine if she was protected like this
Think again:
The main point was seeing her fat ass
Really disrespectful of Noe to release this movie on the 10th anniversary. What's he got against Kevin Nash?
92!
People who ask about the "point" of movies and works of art in general are either midwits or intellectually inexperienced. Get educated.
No. That was literally the entire point. They wrote a rape scene and then created a movie around it. They just wanted to depict a rape in explicit detail because they're degenerate pieces of shit. It's the same with movies like I Spit On Your Grave, or Human Centipede. There was no plot or story written, the writer said, hey wouldn't it be fricked up to show a women getting beaten and raped... TWICE!... Or wouldn't it be funny if three people were forced to shit in each other's mouths. And then they created a movie AROUND their fricked up fetish.
Dumb homosexuals
>you're not smort enough to understand this degenerate rape/revenge fantasy film
>Le degenerate
have a nice day homosexual
I guess your one of the psychos the director describe who found the film masturbatory
He literally intended for people to not like the movie
Nobody cares, have a nice day and stop crying over movies, homosexual
>I'm so angry at anons on the intranest not agreeing with me urrrgghhhh
lol
You are the only one who is angry here. You come into a thread about a film you don't like, and then seethe over le degeneracy. I'm simply suggesting that you should have a nice day
>p-p-pretend to be calm... reply like your not a-a-a-ngry.... urrrggh
>Maybe if I type like a moronic (but le ironically), I will look like I'm actually not seething and projecting or something!
>ok, it's not working. But no matter what, have the last word. That means you won!
>Maybe if I b***h about le heckin' degenerate films on 4chinz, they will magically disappear or something! Also, everyone who thinks I'm moronic is actually mad or something!
by choosing the sex bomb that everyone wanted to frick in any othrr of her movies
yeah right, why hadn't she chose an uggo then? Noone would watch it? Yes
same story as bombshell, baiting with margot robbie to sell le
>metoo
story
I thought the point of the movie is to make people hard.
Reminder that it's a woman's ultimate fantasy to be brutally raped like this.
this, their problem is being seen as a victim and weak afterwards, not the rape itself
Is Enter the Void any good?
YES. Just watched it this week.
Better than Climax (which is also good).
Monica Bellucci plop plop plop