Ooooooooh yes anon epic winrar, You know how to talk to a >woman
9 months ago
guy
Posted twice on /lgbt/ because you continued.
Man, this sure is a lot of projection coming from the person who raped their underage niece
AI "art" is cringe and all of you people supporting it are techbro chuds that used to be cryptobros last year. And you gays need to stop spamming every single art site with that crap.
>He predictably attacks because I went after cartoon groomers and for an article i just made
Boil what's going through your head, do you not realize that I know it's you every time, do you not realize I'm just going to message people more? Is there any degree of sentience going on? AI is more alive than you. >Need
Trying to give people orders lmao. "People" like you boil desperately grasp for power, but AI technology will give people a lot of power that will just make you look even more pathetic in retrospect. You want to be the one who tells people what to think, but AI is an easy source of artistic ideas. >all of you people supporting it are techbro chuds
Groomer generalization.
9 months ago
Anonymous
I don't think Butch Hartman or John K. would be happy that you're rooting for the AI that would replace them, Guy. Also you should stop raping your niece.
The only people who complain about the existence of AI are people who are themselves robotic in the way they approach artwork, and fear being made obsolete like a commodore 64 is obsolete.
Lmao shut up kid, this is one of the most meaningful discussions to have currently
Pedophilic response, the view of a person in the industries who wants people who discuss artwork online to be useless peons instead of people who can threaten your narrative or your career
How many times do you need to be owned like this
first rational anon itt, gj mate
unfortunately youre in a bait thread and OP wants to capture you and suck your clock glop glop glop
Ok your discord groomer shit is getting too obvious, keep it up and I'll bombard lgbtq communities with my truth bombs about how their major creative icons were made by exploiting me, a Catholic, like Steven Universe
>Pedophilic response >How many times do you need to be owned like this
This is how the experts communicate, highest level debating
I’m not even being sarcastic, it’s very good
Can you control this generated image? Can you make AI redraw it but change the perspective to her left shoulder so viewers can see what she's looking at? I haven't seen henerative AI art that lets me play around with perspective yet.
I don't find it enjoyable. Something I like about art is thinking about the work the person(s) put into it. When it's AI generated it feels meaningless. I wouldn't watch an AI cartoon or read an AI comic
yes! your wiener! it is your penis he is going to suck! OP wants to suck your penis for he is a homosexual, and ysee, for that reason he enjoys to perform fellato on the penis! and it is your penis is he after!
I just wanted to play video games with my robo waifu. They called me racist. They called me chud. They called me bigot. That's all fine. They should have left my waifu alone. I have 4 4090s, an autisim spectrum disorder and a costco bottle of adhd meds, and I intend to overclock all of them.
t. Currently working on a better perspective interface by automatically filtering images by applying fast fourier transforms to "read the angles", then redoing the backgrounds incrementally.
Also created a scraper to collect the tears of formerly employed professional dipshits who are now unemployed according to linkedin.
illustrator here. the publishers i work with can't even use collaboratory apps like notion, let alone a more advanced tech like stable diffusion. i'm pretty safe for now
AI is bad for anything but the most generic images. I've just spent 15 minutes trying to find the right prompts to get Danny Devito to dab and it does nothing.
AI "art" is cringe and all of you people supporting it are techbro chuds that used to be cryptobros last year. And you gays need to stop spamming every single art site with that crap.
No, ai arc is just a tool, in the hands of someone without artistic skills it will just be randomly generated funny pictures just like how we make shitty memes and youtube poops, in the hands of professionals and studios it can make art cheaper. It will not replace artists.
>It will not replace artists >Book publishers, television studios, and advertisers are already using AI-generated images instead of hiring artists.
It already is.
I don't care about random individuals using AI art. If some dude wants to use an AI prompt in order to make a meme image or in order to generate his DnD character, I don't know why people scream at him that he's not allowed. If some one-man programmer making an indie game wants to generate a bunch of head portraits because he has no money to hire artists but still wants a few art assets in order to make his game feel more complete, why shouldn't he use the tools? Why do we gatekeep and go, "OH YOU'RE OUT OF MONEY? TOO BAD, SHOULD'VE HAD MORE MONEY!" when we've been consistently trying to tell people to go indie instead of working for a big studio.
This is all VERY different from a giant corporation using AI in order to cut costs but NOT cut labor. For example, the way that the layout department and storyboard department got merged, but the work still exists. All that happened when storyboards got moved digitally is that storyboard artists now have WAY more work to do compared to the 90's. That's what I'm against. Not the random broke furry who uses AI to generate the OC he has in his head.
AI art and voices are bad so are youtube poops bad? Are those gmod videos bad? Are vocaloid songs bad? They pretty much use the same sources to make their videos and voices.
No. It can be used with less effort than learning loomis or photoshop. That's still meaningful.
>No loyalty, no beliefs,
True. >no toilets.
That squad didn't have toilets anyways. >Hatred and greed.
Porn rarely comes from a place of hatred. Oh, and did I mention porn?
the models and programs themselves that can look for correlations in the data are works of art, the output images, meh
yes it has disrupted certain markets to some degree, like commissions, promo art, etc but remains to see how the legality issues will be resolved
skill ceiling so low it's less impressive than querying a database, a teenage fotballer can catch up to the best prompt-type-and-waiters in a weekend, so it's good fun, like a videogame
this tech is in its infancy still, one day artist can likely train their own models on their own art for various purposes, that will be cool and can be a real paradigm shift for indie projects
online art communities were always shit, always, since before y2k
You don’t care about ai, you just want to start a fight on Cinemaphile
Next thread
Wow anon, youre so smart AND you get trips
Wanna make out?
Kiss me you fool!
Mwah!
Ouuuuh anon, you're so handsome, I love how you BTFO'd OP it's making me so wet
Oh baby, i know you love it when I win at Cinemaphile
*has sex with you
Ooooooooh yes anon epic winrar, You know how to talk to a >woman
Posted twice on /lgbt/ because you continued.
>He predictably attacks because I went after cartoon groomers and for an article i just made
Boil what's going through your head, do you not realize that I know it's you every time, do you not realize I'm just going to message people more? Is there any degree of sentience going on? AI is more alive than you.
>Need
Trying to give people orders lmao. "People" like you boil desperately grasp for power, but AI technology will give people a lot of power that will just make you look even more pathetic in retrospect. You want to be the one who tells people what to think, but AI is an easy source of artistic ideas.
>all of you people supporting it are techbro chuds
Groomer generalization.
I don't think Butch Hartman or John K. would be happy that you're rooting for the AI that would replace them, Guy. Also you should stop raping your niece.
cmon guy bby touch my peepee
The only people who complain about the existence of AI are people who are themselves robotic in the way they approach artwork, and fear being made obsolete like a commodore 64 is obsolete.
Lmao shut up kid, this is one of the most meaningful discussions to have currently
previous threads on the topic provide undeniable evidence that no meaningful discussion will occur here
Pedophilic response, the view of a person in the industries who wants people who discuss artwork online to be useless peons instead of people who can threaten your narrative or your career
How many times do you need to be owned like this
Ok your discord groomer shit is getting too obvious, keep it up and I'll bombard lgbtq communities with my truth bombs about how their major creative icons were made by exploiting me, a Catholic, like Steven Universe
>Pedophilic response
>How many times do you need to be owned like this
This is how the experts communicate, highest level debating
I’m not even being sarcastic, it’s very good
Man, this sure is a lot of projection coming from the person who raped their underage niece
>You just want to discuss something on a website made for discussing things
???
Yes. Next question.
Oh boy it's the weekly AI debate thread
No.
Can you control this generated image? Can you make AI redraw it but change the perspective to her left shoulder so viewers can see what she's looking at? I haven't seen henerative AI art that lets me play around with perspective yet.
I don't know, I don't make AI images (or have the AI make them, if you will). You should ask in Cinemaphile Stable Diffusion general.
Yes, but not with a prompt control.
No. Thread over.
I'm not watching your video, shill.
Not really
I don't find it enjoyable. Something I like about art is thinking about the work the person(s) put into it. When it's AI generated it feels meaningless. I wouldn't watch an AI cartoon or read an AI comic
first rational anon itt, gj mate
unfortunately youre in a bait thread and OP wants to capture you and suck your clock glop glop glop
Noooo not my wiener!!
yes! your wiener! it is your penis he is going to suck! OP wants to suck your penis for he is a homosexual, and ysee, for that reason he enjoys to perform fellato on the penis! and it is your penis is he after!
well put, i quite enjoy the human element behind an industry
I don't care that much but at the same time I don't disagree with
I like that thinking about how a program is capable of imitating art to such a high degree of accuracy. It's not a replacement, just something else.
Every field.
It should 100 percent remove the begging for art threads so that's enough of a win by itself.
>"Learn to code chuds"
>Chuds learn to code and begin to make AI stuff that is replacing their jobs.
SJWs weren't telling you to learn to code, that was programmers. and your parents
And most programmers are usually pro-gammer sock wearers and parents tend to be huge democrats so yeah homosexuals and trannies.
Nice try.
>"Learn to code chuds"
>Chuds learn to code and begin to make AI
>AI learns how to code
>unity happens
>robots take over the world
God fricking damn it chuds
>unity
Singularity
I just wanted to play video games with my robo waifu. They called me racist. They called me chud. They called me bigot. That's all fine. They should have left my waifu alone. I have 4 4090s, an autisim spectrum disorder and a costco bottle of adhd meds, and I intend to overclock all of them.
t. Currently working on a better perspective interface by automatically filtering images by applying fast fourier transforms to "read the angles", then redoing the backgrounds incrementally.
Also created a scraper to collect the tears of formerly employed professional dipshits who are now unemployed according to linkedin.
illustrator here. the publishers i work with can't even use collaboratory apps like notion, let alone a more advanced tech like stable diffusion. i'm pretty safe for now
You have my condolonces anon. I work in special ed so I also deal with the mentally moronic.
thumbnail looks like giant penis
It depends
AI is bad for anything but the most generic images. I've just spent 15 minutes trying to find the right prompts to get Danny Devito to dab and it does nothing.
Skill issue.
AI "art" is cringe and all of you people supporting it are techbro chuds that used to be cryptobros last year. And you gays need to stop spamming every single art site with that crap.
Thank God Pixiv offered the option to block AI Art.
Plenty of artists are going to be using it for their workflow genius, you're attached to a feature that will literally last months, probably
No, ai arc is just a tool, in the hands of someone without artistic skills it will just be randomly generated funny pictures just like how we make shitty memes and youtube poops, in the hands of professionals and studios it can make art cheaper. It will not replace artists.
>It will not replace artists
>Book publishers, television studios, and advertisers are already using AI-generated images instead of hiring artists.
It already is.
name 5 of them
>a mangled intro that looks like shit
the fact that the director had to come out for damage control says a lot
literally who
I don't care about random individuals using AI art. If some dude wants to use an AI prompt in order to make a meme image or in order to generate his DnD character, I don't know why people scream at him that he's not allowed. If some one-man programmer making an indie game wants to generate a bunch of head portraits because he has no money to hire artists but still wants a few art assets in order to make his game feel more complete, why shouldn't he use the tools? Why do we gatekeep and go, "OH YOU'RE OUT OF MONEY? TOO BAD, SHOULD'VE HAD MORE MONEY!" when we've been consistently trying to tell people to go indie instead of working for a big studio.
This is all VERY different from a giant corporation using AI in order to cut costs but NOT cut labor. For example, the way that the layout department and storyboard department got merged, but the work still exists. All that happened when storyboards got moved digitally is that storyboard artists now have WAY more work to do compared to the 90's. That's what I'm against. Not the random broke furry who uses AI to generate the OC he has in his head.
It depends on how it’s used
I think people fear on AI art quite worrying
AI art and voices are bad so are youtube poops bad? Are those gmod videos bad? Are vocaloid songs bad? They pretty much use the same sources to make their videos and voices.
So basically AI is a tool that can be used by everybody for many different reasons.
No. It can be used with less effort than learning loomis or photoshop. That's still meaningful.
>No loyalty, no beliefs,
True.
>no toilets.
That squad didn't have toilets anyways.
>Hatred and greed.
Porn rarely comes from a place of hatred. Oh, and did I mention porn?
My Black that is positively outrageous
But I do not recall inquiring
the models and programs themselves that can look for correlations in the data are works of art, the output images, meh
yes it has disrupted certain markets to some degree, like commissions, promo art, etc but remains to see how the legality issues will be resolved
skill ceiling so low it's less impressive than querying a database, a teenage fotballer can catch up to the best prompt-type-and-waiters in a weekend, so it's good fun, like a videogame
this tech is in its infancy still, one day artist can likely train their own models on their own art for various purposes, that will be cool and can be a real paradigm shift for indie projects
online art communities were always shit, always, since before y2k
it'll be like photography. everyone can take a photo, but it takes a certain skillset to make a good one
now that i've seen countless of generated images i tell apart the ones that use skill and ones that are just insert prompt-generate-and done