Is it *that* bad?

Is it *that* bad?

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No it's good

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No, people here just hate that the ending they made works better on film than the comic one.
      Simple as.

      It was probably as good of a Watchmen movie adaptation as anyone could ever make. Take that as you will.

      What about the bad acting?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >loaded question

        [...]

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The prostitute that plays Silk Spectre is terrible, but who cares? She's just there for breasts. Everyone else is decent.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          They're pretty much all bad.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >The prostitute that plays Silk Spectre is terrible
          >DAN!

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No one would feel bad for the us if Manhattan attacked them they'd be gloating about it forever

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Not just that, as far as the world knew, major cities across the world got blown up by Manhattan, that's the equivalent of some frustrated butthole in the US flipping the switch on a couple of nukes to hit major sites across the world, including US cities. The rest of the world wouldn't have been laughing at the US, they'd have been majorly fricking pissed that the US couldn't keep their superweapon, the one they paraded as their major advantage against the Soviet Union, on a leash. Everything would have gotten much worse in that case, because in the book, at least the 'alien' only fricked up one city and wasn't connected to an existing nation to lay blame against.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Whats even more genius in Veidt's plan in the comics, its that he pupousfully made the population fear Aliens, by profiting on the general Cold War paranoia and making Alien invasion movies on theater.
        He also went in great legths to explain that the squid was just a squid and his psychic attack was like a bee sting out of relfex. Implying to the public that if an animal can do this, what an organized Alien group can do ?

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No, people here just hate that the ending they made works better on film than the comic one.
    Simple as.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Unironically this. If the comic and films had swapped endings, then people would criticise the film for playing into campy comic cliches too hard. There would be endless Cinemaphile threads with a picture of the CGI squid, paired with WHAT WAS HE THINKING!?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Unironically this. If the comic and films had swapped endings, then people would criticise the film for playing into campy comic cliches too hard. There would be endless Cinemaphile threads with a picture of the CGI squid, paired with WHAT WAS HE THINKING!?

      You didn't understand what happened in Watchmen.
      Read it again, and don't skip the prose at the end of each issue next time

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It fundamentally fricks up the premise because Comedian's freak out happens because he sees the Squid.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It was probably as good of a Watchmen movie adaptation as anyone could ever make. Take that as you will.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Still the best Superhero movie Zack Snyder ever made. Take that for what it's worth.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      300 is still his best CB movie

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No. The movie is fine; visually impressive, perfect actors for the roles, and is an alright adaptation. The cult of Anti-Snyder just never shuts the frick up, though.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >slow motion during fights
      >makes Nite Owl into a badass
      >the literal who actress that plays Silk Spectre is bad
      >Veidt is in le badguy costume from the start
      >changed the ending, missing the point of that part of the commentary the comic book has on Silver Age aesthetics being juxtaposed with Modern Age sensibilities
      >HALLELUJAH
      >calls them "The Watchmen" in the movie, when that's fricking moronic and misses the point

      Bob Dylan opening, Rorschach, Dr. Manhattan, and The Comedian are good.

      Nope. Only the opening and the birth of Doctor Manhattan are done well.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >slow motion during fights
    >makes Nite Owl into a badass
    >the literal who actress that plays Silk Spectre is bad
    >Veidt is in le badguy costume from the start
    >changed the ending, missing the point of that part of the commentary the comic book has on Silver Age aesthetics being juxtaposed with Modern Age sensibilities
    >HALLELUJAH
    >calls them "The Watchmen" in the movie, when that's fricking moronic and misses the point

    Bob Dylan opening, Rorschach, Dr. Manhattan, and The Comedian are good.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Rorschach
      They didn't even get his voice right.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >changed the ending, missing the point of that part of the commentary the comic book has on Silver Age aesthetics being juxtaposed with Modern Age sensibilities
      I like the work of Alan Moore but that's giving way, way too much credit to the fake alien squid. The Watchmen series was so good because it assembled an original and compelling story out of the deconstructed pieces of capeshit. It would have been weaker if Moore leaned in more heavily on satirizing genre cliches at the time. Seriously, imagine if a twirling Rorschach test was used as a transition between scenes, or if some cliche subplot about Nite Owl having murdered parents got put in.
      Also, Watchmen isn't THAT deep. I don't think even Zach Snyder is capable of "missing the point". It's a meaningful comic with a lot of themes worth analyzing, but it's not esoteric. If you want impossible to comprehend nonsense, go watch Eraserhead

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Watchmen isn't THAT deep.
        It is THAT deep, which still isn't all that deep in reality.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's only bad in the context that it totally misses the point of one of the best comics ever and reduces it to a capeshit blockbuster.
    Without that contexxt, it's a pretty well done if not particularly exciting movie.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They made a B- movie with A+ source material. The book does everything better, even though the casting for Rorschach, Manhattan, and Comedian was good.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    NO! and im so sorry to act like an butthole with it when i was younger... it's a good movie

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Is great if you haven't read the comic

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    THEY MADE WATCHMEN WITHOUT THE SLIMY SQUID!

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It did eliminate the Hamlet like story within the story but the fricker was over 3 hours and still cut a bunch of shit from the comics so idk. If it were made today, it would be a 10-12 episode HBO series

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >If it were made today

      Wow, you're moronic.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No, it was okay.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >300
    Great!
    >Watchmen
    Really good!
    >Man of Steel
    Ehh, not that good. Okay.
    >Batman V Superman
    Unwatchable dreck. I couldn’t make a worse movie if I was specifically commanded to make a worse movie. Legitimate contender for worst movie ever made
    I’ve never seen someone fall off that hard, his career literally looks like this graph. Ps I still haven’t seen the Snyder cut and I never will because of Batman V Superman

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Batman V Superman
      >Unwatchable dreck.
      I direct to this master work titled "The Metaphysics of Batman v Superman: A 15,000 Word Analysis".

      [...]

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Cinemaphile
        I'm not reading this moronic shit on a board for literal pedophiles.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          wheredoyouthinkyouare.jpg

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The same site I've been on for the past 15 years. There's a difference between 2D shit, and actual children like you Cinemaphile pedophiles jerk it to.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >There's a difference

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                There's a pretty big difference, so frick off back to Cinemaphile.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Damn... Cinemaphile shitposting has gotten advanced.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You forgot Suckerpunch.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Now, whenever someone says Snyder is all style no substance I disagree with it.
        Suckerpunch is an exception. God, the movie looks down right fantastic in places but it has no actual good meat to chew on.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I like the comparison some anon made a few years ago to MCR's cover of Desolation Row.
    Yeah, it's not as good as the original and a 3rd of the lyrics are missing, but shit still slaps.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >from the director of 300

    well watchmen was definitely better than 300

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *