Is Jon Kent really bisexual?

He was a real shithead, but I wasn't molested or anything. Me being gay was completely organic. I didn't even consider it until I was 20, and I went out on a date with someone I knew for a long time and it went really well, and I wasn't sure about it sexually until it happened and immediately I was like "Huh, I guess I'm also attracted to men. Neat!" and it didn't make me any less attracted to women. It was like I had only ever considered hamburgers, then circumstantially I tried a slice of pizza and went "Hey! Pizza's pretty good too!"

Why? You can choose between them. Some people don't like one or the other or both, some people like both, and nobody should be forced to eat one they don't like.

I'm attracted to both men and women equally. Call it whatever you want, I don't care.

You might like men and women, but Jon Kent sure won't like women ever again.

John Constantine if only because being bi makes sense because it gives reason for his degeneracy.

>You can't define 'degeneracy' in any meaningful way
Dude was a punk rocker, just about anything goes and it wouldn't be out of place.

I meant veteran fujo, though she does have prior industry experience too.
CS Pacat wrote that little story in the lazarus planet event where Jon meets a better love interest.

She and Taylor are both Aussies, so maybe they'll get into a bar fight and she'll glass him and take over writing duties.

that is the single lowest-IQ ideology I have ever heard, and I have heard a lot. Your entirely ideological position is "we've lost, give up", which is exactly what the people actually oppressing you want you to do. You're basically laying down and letting the parasite drain all the blood from your body, and you're claiming it's a position of ideological purity. You are, and I say this with one hundred percent sincerity and without a shred of hyperbole, pathetic

This, other homosexual keeps calling everyone else pathetic. When they are the actual pathetic one. Projecting 101.

Do you think that's all gay men do? Is missionary penetration the only sex you ever d- oh you know what, I can't finish that sentence, you and I both know that if you're saying that, you don't have sex. Also, I know that's extra true because if you had ever been legitimately intimate with a woman you would know that that's RIGHT there behind the curtain constantly. I've had a girl suck my dick after literally fricking her in the ass, AND I've had veganal sex with a woman after fricking a man in the ass in a threesome, and you don't hear a ton of complaints because women are a lot filthier than a teenage virgin like you knows.

>the gays are all pedophiles
the least effective and most repeated propaganda I hear, and it never actually works on anyone

Literally nobody is 'beating the working class to keep them in line' with LGBT rep. They're beating us to keep us in line because of capitalism. You're looking at rainbow capitalism and complaining because of the rainbow. It's the most bafflingly myopic perspective. You're being beaten up and abused by authoritarian forces with batons, and blaming it on the batons being made out of wood. You're being shot and blaming the company that mined the metal.

>the degeneracy
> a hip thing like castration
Oh, you're just trolling. That's a relief.

Are you just referring to HRT as castration? Universally?

No. Plenty of trans women go on to have kids with a female partner. Estrogen can make it harder to have an erection, but it isn't chemical castration. They might use certain variants with some similarities in chemistry terms for chemical castration, but table salt is made from an explosive metal and a poisonous gas.

Pushed by the evil demonic goblin international israelites, right? With the help of the illuminati and the satanists from the center of the flat earth?

You're not, you're just parroting your favorite right-wing twitter personalities instead of having your own opinion, so why should I take it seriously?

>no u
>these empty things, like stable happy consentual relationships
>da evul israelites and da cultural marxists (spit)
Anon, please take the discussion seriously

I looked at the sources on that image you so rabidly point to, and it's not as damning as you've been told it is. For the love of god please do some actual research and stop only listening to guys who need to replace the batteries in their carbon monoxide detectors. Do some actual reading (I know, it's a big ask for someone like you) and try listening to someone who disagrees with you. I do it all the time. I can't tell you how many times I've sat down and really, really listened to what your kind of guys have to say, and it's never convincing because once you break the seal on that and actually do the one thing they don't expect you to ever do, which is actually do the reading, their entire perspective falls apart.

>I have friends who are trans
>we
Yeah I'm not buying that.

Oh, definitely it has been co-opted by capitalism, and it's part of why it's suddenly exploded into media, but you're hitching onto it this secondary thing about how it's being used to bewitch our youths and taint the purity of the american bloodline by endorsing miscegination and sodomy. I'm sick of other people's fantasy roleplay about angels and demons being used to tell people how to live their lives.

Are you completely insane? COVID wasn't notably spread by the gays, it was spread by conservatives refusing to wear masks and get vaccinated.

I’m talking about monkey pox you mong, just before lock downs came to an end that years pride was somehow still active enough to spread monkey pox to multiple countries

I live in a very gay part of the country, for the most part most are ok but you have to accept that stereo types exist for a reason. But cling to this corporate lie as long as you can anon, it’s the only world you know

>more trouble controlling their horny than straight men
This is only true because women keep straight men on tight leashes. If they were just as promiscuous as men, then there would just as much sex.

Yes that's true. But that's indicative of a greater problem. Straight men and women have a better culture than us in many ways. Their culture has to be about producing stable families. Our culture lacks that trial and trial is what makes something strong.

Aren't all gays in this thread doing apologetics trying to be 'straight acting', that is to say prove we compatible with that culture? That doesn't mean all straight men are high and mighty and I bow my head to them.

Discrimination is part of it. If you mistreat a plant expect it to decay and become ugly. But just like we are finding out a huge % of straight men and women are not fit to have a relationship and want to be prostitutes but were just unable because of strict customs the same is true with gay men. They either don't want a respectable relationship or are lacking in too many virtues to have one and just want to go chase femboys or whatever.

The majority of gay men/culture is trash. That's something you have to accept if you have remotly right wing values.

Whatever promotes a stable, healthy child raising environment is virtuous.

But you don't have to raise a family, you don't have to get a partner, you can even be a prostitute. You just have to do it within the context of knowing the value system in that cannot ever be the majority or the whole human race thing isn't happening. Virtues are outcome based. And it happens that the outcome that produces stable families is such and such.

I used to think but the older I get the more I have my doubts and think the majority of our kind is trash. I just don't consider myself in the same identity as that trash. Straight men can look at another straight man and say 'we have nothing in common, you're trash'. So can I.

Are... are you seriously asking if there are stable, happy gay couples? Because there are absolutely tons of them. I know I'm saying that while living on the west coast, but jesus christ man, yes there are happy gay couples who have kids and pets and a house with a lawn and everything.

I know that was a ridiculous question. But being in this neck of the woods that is Cinemaphile and has no experience in dating. I can't help but be dissuaded in even wanting to bother when it comes to statistics that constantly get thrown around. In addition to anecdotal testimonials, even beyond that community. It just seems like getting in a relationship is more trouble than it's worth nowadays. Thanks to how it's been commodified through social media and dating apps.

Thanks for the reassurance, anon. It's definitely a breath of fresh air in this particular space. I know that's definitely on me for frequenting this forum. This website has the reputation that it does for a reason, viewing the world through this scape will only show so much. But once again thanks, anon.

1. Most gay/bi men are prostitutes. The ones that are not have mental issues, including me.
2. Surrogacy is expensive and we are in a recession.

Honestly if the pride movement didn't swing so fricking far and get hooked onto the trans shit it could have been a few decades before we saw how tolerance of this stuff affected a new generation. As it is most gay/bi adults are hung up on being closeted and overcompensating for it by going so far the other way that they become fricking caricatures.

Instead they let the mentally ill dictate how all of us are perceived and its just going to solidify and JUSTIFY a suspicion of gays for years to come. Personally, I just like dating guys because it ends of being like having a best friend that you can frick. Its what I tend to want form woman anyway.

Most gay and bi are scum. So pride had to become scum. The Stonewall Visitors, Harvey Milk, were all cutting edge scum.

Pride was a temporary situation based on a certain political landscape. Have you heard "politics makes strange bed fellows". It means sometimes your goals align with people you wouldn't think would be your partner. Just forget the trannies and develop your life. If you want the world to have more gays that are not scum start with yourself.

Honestly if the pride movement didn't swing so fricking far and get hooked onto the trans shit it could have been a few decades before we saw how tolerance of this stuff affected a new generation. As it is most gay/bi adults are hung up on being closeted and overcompensating for it by going so far the other way that they become fricking caricatures.

Instead they let the mentally ill dictate how all of us are perceived and its just going to solidify and JUSTIFY a suspicion of gays for years to come. Personally, I just like dating guys because it ends of being like having a best friend that you can frick. Its what I tend to want form woman anyway.

Why is sleeping around morally wrong? Hard mode: don't quote the bible, don't use slurs, and don't just call it "being a prostitute" and have that be your argument. You have to actually define why sleeping around is morally wrong in a way that would be true of anyone sleeping around a lot, including straight men.

>when people are allowed to live their lives free from the expectation of stentorian monogamy, they have fewer kids, helping to reduce overpopulation
The only way you see that as a negative is if you're trying to use this as a vehicle for the 'great replacement' theory, which was already outdated and debunked in like 2016.

I believe you, bud.

Little too much info dude, also that's disgusting. Gets some help, that ain't right.

>You know this, how? Consider me doubtful that you're familiar with any bisexuals in your life.
A friend of mine asked for permission to date my sister, I said I wouldn't mind. My sister gave me more shit about him being bisexual than her brother's friend asking her out.

>There's downsides to having a bisexual as a partner. They have more opportunities to cheat either emotionally or physically. Socially lower status.
Just like Oscar Wilde. Ruined his wife's life because he couldn't suppress his love of sex with male prostitutes. Now he's a hero because of it.

That's really well put. You don't want someone to only love 50% of you.

Yes. The psychological incompatible is there but also they know bisexual men are statistically more likely to settle on a woman. For a lot bi men guys are for fun sexy little episodes and woman is something you want as a life partner. So their fear is justified. The guy could even have a wife and is just looking to get a lay by deception.

When you don't have a partner you think of relationships rationally so you see hang ups. When you do you think of relationships emotionally and realize it's not hang ups. While unjust prejudice does exist most people who refuse to date bisexuals have a very good reason. We are not psychologically compatible with them. There's maybe 5-15% of women we are psychologically compatable with and 15-35% of gay men. That sounds disparaging until you realize we are a tiny part of the population anyway so it would make sense that our partners would be too.

How petty.