Anyone seen this? Getting serious Michael Moore type vibes here. Basically:
>interview crazy people
>let them speak freely
>record everything and post it raw for the lulz to discredit everyone else by association
Seems pretty effective tbh
Is Matt Walsh the new Michael Moore?
You CHUDS are STILL spreading toxic transphobic misinformation? That's it, no more Mr. Nice Guy.
MAYONNAISE CHUD, your toxic rhetoric will NOT divide us.
Mayonnaise CHUD, we do not forget. We do not forgive. You have been warned.
We are the Chudbusters. Mayonnaise Chud of Chuddonnaise, consider yourself WARNED. This is ChudWATCH.
Chudbuster OUT.
sneed
the reddit spacing gave it away!
>reddit is the only website that uses line breaks!
Yes.
Kek
Make better bait, homosexual chud.
Stop invalidating trans people with your hatred.
6/8 I chortled
Chudbros.....
>Mr. Nice Guy.
Um, I am non-binary and this is triggering me.
chud bro's....
it's officialy over
FPBPBNNBP (first post based post but not necessarily best post)
Trannies will never be women and simultaneously tongue my anus.
TW:Capital letters, anger, warnings
Using GENDERED LANGUAGE? That's it, no more Mx. Nice folx.
MILK CHUD, your disgusting mcokery will NOT divide us.
MILK CHUD, we don't forget and don't forgive fascists, This is your only warning
We are the real CHUDBUSTERS, MILKY CHUD of Amerikkka, consider yourself WARNED. This is the real ChudWATCH.
Chudbuster
He's not even half the man Moore is.
I feel like there's a second meaning hidden in the folds of your comment somewhere, but I can't put my finger on it...
He's likely a third of him because Moore is very, very fat.
agreed, he needs to triple his weight
Ayy lmao
Nice anon, very nice
Lmaooooo
that documental is literally killing transfolks everyday
I don't get why he wouldn't just release the documentary for free on youtube. It would get millions of views and far more attention. Laughing at these crazy people might be fun, but I'm not going to pay these midwits money for recording them.
Because no streaming service would pay him ad revenue for it. Best case, it would be removed and he'd be banned instantly. Worst case, they'd leave it up and everyone would watch it for free and he wouldn't make any money to recoup expenses.
Because they run a business and Illinois of views doesn't mean shit if it doesn't make any money (YouTube demonotized DW channel)
You needn't pay to watch this.
I saw it the other day, it doesn't deliver anything surprising or shocking just more ameritards being fricking moronic idiots.
Best part was naming the israelites though
the only israelite was that based female doctor though
He named money and kinsey
neither are israelites moron
you know the doctor who brought all Money's pedo shit to light actually WAS a israelite?
Ah you're right. I thought money was.
She didn't name Magnus Hirschfield. I wonder why?
Because Youtube moderation would delete it and ban him, citing some half assed reason based on their vague rules. Even if he appealed and won it would be weeks before he could come back and he'd lose a ton of revenue.
so instead he reports any attempt to post it on youtube as copyright violations?
because the purpose isn't to convert anybody or change anything, it's more masturbatory conservative media designed to pacify boomers while making a bit of cash
Blatantly false
The documentary and the message already spread, there's no need
YouTube would unironically remove it immediately because it doesn't fit their agenda.
but anon, its been posted to youtube multiple times, and was only removed because copyrights
That's very antisemitic of you, do better
Because the centre right wing is a grift, they're not here to make change, they're here to take money from conservitards
*watches What is a Woman? once*
To be fair this homie is deformed. HRT can't save him but jesus can
How long until the inevitable suicide
he is probably too low iq to consider suicide
I think he's one of the 60% actually, he probably dodged the bullet.
He's on the right track now. He stays there he'll be fine.
Hopefully never, and he lives a long happy life.
This kills the transphobe
he is fricking ugly and only closet gays would frick that
You're mad that you're turned on, huh
you have zero standards go frick one of this guys in real life with no filter and and favorable angles
I did. She was hot and felt all dainty like any other girl.
You're sexually attracted to this. Don't think cherry-picking the rare troony that manages to pass and become a trap puts us in the same boat as you, you degenerate homosexual.
There's always going to be ugly women out there, regardless of sex at birth.
She doesn't look like a trap to me.
>still cherry-picking traps
What did I just tell you, homosexual? You're not normal. Stop trying to groom.
Girl, I'm three for three with cute trans girls. I already said there's always going to be ugly women. Want me to post Rosie O'Donnell and be like: "See? Cis-girls are ugly!" because that's the argument you're making, brainlet.
the point is trannies only look good in carefully staged images/videos.
>ugly women
They're not women. Simple as.
>They're not women. Simple as.
Checked.
i went to school with this freak ama
It's she funny in everyday life, too?
no, 'he' was an annoying, overly flamboyant spoiled gay little c**t who had two birthdays a year ('a half-birthday') and contrary to his little 'coming-out' thing on the internet, was a total butthole who dished out way more than he could take.
my bet would be that he transitioned as a boone to his career, and being a gay little shit wasn't as cool as being a troony anymore.
his name is JJ Totah and he went to school in Burbank, CA.
Kek. I went to the same uni as that guy. My friend even was assigned a radio show with him and said that it’s all camera and angle fraud.
>chap
>man
hmm
Looks like an average shitskin chick.
>that hideous man skull
Do not want
good for him
happy for david
It's pretty funny how if they would just "man up" and stop being homosexual freak mental patients we would support them.
I support trying to be happy. I don't support people harming themselves. It's that simple.
Very good to hear. Will pray for this fellow.
You know If you fricking losers spent as much time on literally anything else in your life as much as you do obsessing about trannies you'd all probably be successful and confident men in your day to day
>this is bait
>don't respond to bait
nnnngggghhh.......
I'll ignore trannies when you stop trying to groom kids
what a tranaphobic comment
>You know If you fricking losers spent as much time on literally anything else in your life as much as you do obsessing about trannies you'd all probably be successful and confident men in your day to day
That's what I thought loser
So, he's IRL soijak?
>interview crazy people
>let them speak freely
This is pretty much the crux of the right's crusade against the transgender movement. Walsh just cherrypicked people who couldn't provide compelling arguments for their positions and acted like their inability to defend themselves invalidated the vast amount of trans people who never get surgeries and the academic research done on gender and sexuality.
>academic research done on gender and sexuality.
he talked about those pedos though
>Walsh just cherrypicked people who couldn't provide compelling arguments for their positions
Like a college professor and the top surgeon in the field?
Who can provide a compelling argument tbh? I would be interesting in viewing a discussion from the other side.
Human chimerism demonstrates that most people have an incredibly oversimplified understanding of sex and gender and history shows us that everything that's associated with "being/looking/acting female" was either originally associated with men and/or you can find countless examples of ciswomen who happen to not conform to them without raising an eyebrow.
One you understand this, you realize most trans and/or non-binary people probably have some form of chimeric property in their genetic makeup that drives them to feel the way they do, but even if not it's a cyclical behavior to gender the behavior in the first place and a limit of language that causes them to have to use those terms to explain to people that's just how they act/dress/socialize. If the general public could take people at face value and not expect someone to beat certain way because of their sex, they wouldn't expect a justification for why those individuals aren't, and they wouldn't need to identify that way in the first place.
> Tldr
That's just how they are
Here’s what’s actually happening
>you can’t wear that, you’re a boy
>well then I’m not a boy
Yeah, except it's also saying: "Only not a boys would want to do that." So they go "Well, then I'm not a boy, does that help you understand why I want to do it?"
How do you know the difference between what's natural and what's mimicked? A lot of my natural behavior was viewed as female when I was younger and I had to learn to start mimicking other males to not get scolded.
> Says he's seen a woman without makeup
>Posts a woman in makeup
its very obvious that trannies mimic m8. they're npc's.
You wanted to wear the dress because you liked it. Unless you’re trying to say the fashion industry knows exactly what will appeal to people on a cellular level, there isn’t much more to this.
>not expect someone to beat certain way because of their sex,
thats literally what trannies do moron. they mimic how they view the opposite gender. very cringe. very unoriginal. and very mentally ill.
Since none of the "crazy people" he interviewed could provide an answer, can you? What is a woman?
the problem, and it's one that morons like you and matt himself fail to understand, is that you can't hold up a mirror to these people. the interview with the college professor made plenty of rounds online reposted by progressives themselves because they saw that discussion went in their favor through their own lens.
>the problem, and it's one that morons like you and matt himself fail to understand, is that you can't hold up a mirror to these people.
That's not the goal. They're clearly insane and well beyond any sort of actual dialogue. The goal is to show this stuff to normalgay fencesitters.
normalgays won't see this. the only people that are seeing it are conservatives that already have this stance. it feels pretty pointless.
I showed some of the worst scenes to liberal relatives:
>oh, I can't believe he's taking what those naked men in SF are out of context
>let me tell you how amazing SF is btw, no other city matters!
>normies are going to watch a documentary made by a vocal christian, hosted on a christian "news" website
>Cinemaphile dead as frick
>most new threads get 5 replies and go straight to page 10
>threads about this are literally the only fast moving threads in the entire board
A toast to women
>Boy howdy I sure do love female genitals and doing sex to them!
- Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson
Because they're are 10 troony discords raiding at any given time and they need to correct the record
this
it's all so tiresome
There are literally no other threads about this and apparently it gets you a ban.
kek, saved.
This is what a trans woman looks like
I thought it was more like picrel
You want to look at the picture again?
The age of hot tiktok trannies is upon us. Ugly trannies will always exist but as long as the passable ones are getting attention I'm ok with them
I don't watch television or films anymore. It's all pozzed garbage filled with Black folk, israelites, trannies, and homosexuals.
I come here specifically to seek out shitpost threads.
Based and redpilled.
same
then they should show some material worth discussing on tv other than capeshit and wokeshit
Dirlewanggang drip straight bussin frfr
Half the threads on the board are sponsored by Disney and you get a three day if you say anything that's not reddit friendly. Frick television and film and frick this board.
pol keeps this board alive as always
His voice sounds like someone who's been roasted during Jocktober on O&A. Was he ever a morning zoo host?
Trump lost.
Sex and gender are entirely different concepts.
Touch grass, have sex.
Please go back to your chud containment hole
>troony telling others to have sex
Hilarious
>still posting this christcucks virtue bullying dishonest shit
>troony subhuman is actually mad that right wingers are better than him
JUST
>still getting triggered in 2022
>interview crazy people
THAT's the average troony.
The "normal and like everybody else" troony that Hollywood try to push, is the false reality.
>crazy people
Anon, he interviews 'the experts'. He interviewed people in positions of power within our institutions.
If they're crazy then something really fricked up is going on. The real giggle though is that all any of them had to do to stop him in his tracks and ensure their clips would never be shown anywhere was to just answer the question truthfully. Adult. Human. Female. It would have been the end of the interview and they could go back to spending their time corrupting the youth like Satan intended. Of all the right wing online personalities Matt Walsh isn't going to be the one to cancel culture these people's lives the same way the left would. Anyone who believes he would is just projecting. Which is ultimately why none of the lefties appearing in the documentary gave him the correct answer.
kek
instainly based
so the angle the discord troons are going by is "the movie is not exposing the israelites enough"
lmao terrible damage control
True, especially when considering that in the current paradigm all the cool kids are right wing, racist and anti-gay and all the squares are leftists who "respect pronouns" and moralgay about racism.
We're teaching levels of delusion that shouldn't be possible
>We're teaching levels of delusion that shouldn't be possible
You are referring to all the freaks in the classrooms grooming children, yes? I'd agree, that's why the left will never actually have the people on their side. They are just a bunch of crybullies with maniacal antiwhite male prejudice.
No I was referring to your larp that the conservative kids are ever anything but a random whiteboi that everyone thinks is annoying
>they hate us cause they ain't us
It's so true mayo bros, how do we live with this superiority?
>LARP
>never been to a party before
OH NONONONO
The projection lol The last party I went to the one conservative boy went "Frick feminism!" as a joke when he was playing airhockey against a girl and made a score and everyone went silent. He literally almost started crying and then went around saying "That beat the toxic masculinity out of me. No one was on my side."
>accuses others of LARPing while posting this sjw cringe fantasy
TOP KEK
How's 9th grade while being a weak art-class freak btw?
I'm 27 and live in Hollywood.
> inb4 you reply with a conservative cringe fantasy
>I'm 27 and live in Hollywood
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Well he's basically a white supremist terrorist, that not a good reason?
>I'm 27 and live in Hollywood.
Be nice, (it) lives in a van down by the river.
I'm work from home and make $33/hr.
>work
Lel
>compromising your beliefs over air hockey
this leftist wishful thinking is hilarious.
I'm imagining a bulldyke typing this, imagining her/its "party" with the other blue-haired gays where this didn't happen.
Holy shit, lefties are awful LARPers
It happened, girly
I disagree.
>It happened
Sure it did, did everyone clap at the end?
Ya, they clapped and then they all denounced supporting Drumpf and his reign of white supremacy, then gave us all the power and I almost stopped feeling insecure about being black and obese.
I'm white and skinny and everyone already hated trump and Biden both. Every world leader was a member of the same youth group run by a israeli billionaire. The deck is stacked.
Yo that's dope xD
When did you transition?
I'm just nonbinary, I don't have to transition
The unfiltered truth
I can't seem to find "nonbinary" in my dictionary. Is this another made-up newspeak term?
>I'm just nonbinary
An irrelevant human construct to solidify your frail ego. You're a narcissist and a loser giving yourself special labels to feel good about yourself, which is truly pathetic.
Source?
No, but we did clap when the girl made a point. She really sucked and lost though.
That book convinced the israelites they could actually do that which is why there's so much woke propaganda in the first place nowadays.
You're just not smart enough to understand gender. My friend has a pinky bone that tests as genetically female even though the rest of his body is male.
>You're just not smart enough to understand gender.
You mean the nonsensical and subversice theories made up about gender to confuse and divide the populace. I would say most are smart enough, actually they are smart enough to not buy into it and see it for what it is: a sham.
So you didn't know how to respond to the fact that people can be born with hermaphrodite qualities that you wouldn't even notice if you didn't test every cell of your body?
>let's use a genetic defect in 0.00001% of the population in an attempt to justify why mentally ill trannies make sense
There's never been a study done to test what percentage of the population has it and you would need to test literally everybody to find out for sure. Logic dictates that's most likely what drives the behavior.
https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/non-binary#:~:text=%2F%CB%8Cn%C9%91%CB%90n%20%CB%88ba%C9%AAn%C9%99ri%2F%2C,male%20or%20female%20synonym%20genderqueer
non-binary adjective - Definition, pictures, pronunciation and usage notes
Oxford is the definitive record keeper of the English language
>Oxford is the definitive record keeper of the English language
Historically they were, yes. But if they are adding new definitions for whatever psychotic LARP the modern left comes up with, they can no longer be held in such high regard.
On the authority of Mr. Anon of Seetheshire this decision was made, was it?
I just don't know a lot about intersex people, but I feel like there's a ven Fisher of overlap between the two
Usually men's not always
Explain Dude Looks Like a Lady by Aerosmith
Can you articulate why or is it just because you don't want it to?
>I feel like
How scientific.
>Can you articulate why or is it just because you don't want it to?
Because "hey this makes sense to me" isn't logic.
>On the authority of Mr. Anon of Seetheshire this decision was made, was it?
>literally no argument after his appeal to authority gets BTFO
>Explain Dude Looks Like a Lady by Aerosmith
You're just a homosexual.
It actually was a decent argument because just because you're assertion that they are no longer the definitive record keeper of the English language is inaccurate. The status was never revoked you just personally don't want to acknowledge it after you made the incorrect assertion that nonbinary wasn't in the dictionary and I showed you it ism It's in Webster's, too.
You can't even type coherent sentences and are trying to convince me what is or isn't a "definitive source" on the English language.
He's saying elements of the scientific or pseudo-scientific (what you are talking about is not really pure science) establishment put out garbage, usually to get funding. He is completely correct, and this accurately describes the dross you're trying to get us to read.
Really? Did you even read the article?
Why would I read some shitty pseudo-scientific, agenda-driven troony article? You sound like an unstable child, you are not even in the right state of mind to ponder these sorts of things. Have you even taken a calculus course?
>n-no u
You're a mental patient that can't tell if it's male or female, why is society supposed to take your opinion seriously?
>many such cases
Why are you quoting Trump?
Lol you're mad
No, I'm serious. If you are even confused about being male or female, why are you trying to dictate the aims of society as a whole while deconstructing everything? why should anyone even listen to your tiny opinion? you unironically need to sort yourself out.
>I will deny reality if it doesn't comply with my beliefs.
You heard it here first folks.
Desperate strawman. I win.
>I'm not seeing how pointing out a logical fallacy could be a logical fallacy
Use /misc/.
That was a non-sequitar
You mean a non-sequitur. And no it wasn't, because I'm not arguing anything, just educating you.
You spelled it right but posting /misc/ was still a non-sequitur
No it wasn't, I'm not arguing with you, just educating.
But that just means you're playing make-believe to satiate your ego and not sticking to science, which will tell you if you're male or female.
You responded with a logical fallacy
People can tell that you’ve just moved from hermaphroditism/intersex to chimerism because hermaphroditism/intersex always results in completely non-functional organs and fricked hormones.
>imagine needing a study to know if you are a man or a woman
>Logic dictates that's most likely what drives the behavior.
No, logic doesn't dictate that at all. You've just found some explanation that sounds convenient for you.
>you would need to test literally everybody to find out for sure.
No you "literally" wouldn't. You just test trannies to see if all or at least most of them have it, and that would prove its a physical condition. Yet despite the frequent attempts to claim physical causes no one does this, because they're afraid of the answer they would get.
Well, that's different than claiming only 0.00001% of the population has it, but the thing you're saying there is true. Except, I'm pretty sure they actually would if there was an organization offering to perform those tests because it would help support their argument and also probably make them feel like they don't need to medically transition because they'd know biologically they are female in the chimeric sense.
Everyone has male and female side in them, what is your point? You think that disproves the concept of biological sex?
If you're referring to true hermaphroditism, which there have been approximately 500 recorded cases in recent history, that doesn't require complete cellular testing, that doesn't even make sense. True hermaphrodites have gyno, for the most part, and both ovum and testes which is observable by the naked eye or an MRI. And they are all genetic aberrations, most of which are female, or XX in chromosomal predominance.
I know someone who has a genetic female tissue in just their pinky finger
Yeah and we have DNA in common with bananas, guy's all male
most "non-binaries" are just women and girls who want attention so it's not important either way
Don’t forget the ones who were sexually traumatized and thus hate everything that attracted their attacker.
There has never been a case of true hermaphroditism, their organs are always vestigial and non-functional.
That book demonstrated that the slide toward fascism is systemic and such is validated by the forced acceptance of absurdities. Take your meds.
Both statements are true brainlet
You've never seen a woman without her other and makeup on, huh?
>You've never seen a woman without her other and makeup on, huh?
It's endlessly hilarious that troons like you simultaneously obsess over becoming women and yet harbor endless hatred for them.
I don't. It's true.
It highlights you're working understanding of biological sex is inaccurate
The clitoris is made out of the same organic tissue as a penis and is basically just a micropenis, so technically all women have penises. And thank you, I appreciate the kind words, but I'm an overall happy person and my gender is just a tertiary aspect of my existence even if it is in vogue right now.
>The clitoris is made out of the same organic tissue as a penis and is basically just a micropenis, so technically all women have penises. And thank you, I appreciate the kind words, but I'm an overall happy person and my gender is just a tertiary aspect of my existence even if it is in vogue right now.
Pic related. No.
You don't have to agree. I found that out from a transphobic women's rights advocate, it's a medical fact.
>You don't have to agree
Then stop advocating the legislation of thoughtcrime.
>It highlights you're working understanding of biological sex is inaccurate
Explain how.
What do you need a source for? you're the one using moronic make-believe words like nonbinary, you show me the source.
I did on both accounts
Venn diagram my bad. Also it's called an educated guess. That's how you formulate a hypothesis, from there I would figure out how to test my therapy that two different ways of classifying how humans biologically can display both sexual characteristics might have some degree of overlap. That's the scientific method in a nutshell
>I did on both accounts
No you didn't, you got BTFO then started coping.
>from there I would figure out how to test my therapy that two different ways of classifying how humans biologically can display both sexual characteristics might have some degree of overlap.
You should become literate before delving into big boy things like science, sweetie. Otherwise you will come up with all sorts of schizophrenic ideas, like sex doesn't exist and gender is just a social construct.
>Venn diagram my bad. Also it's called an educated guess. That's how you formulate a hypothesis,
Here's some help for you since you clearly failed all of your STEM classes.
Bro, they don't even realize they're talking about soft sciences. They don't recognize the degree to which they've been infected with ideology. They've never heard the name Sokal before. They won't acknowledge the replication crisis let alone understand how it's rooted in ideological fashions. There's no point.
His mind is gone, this is more for the bystanders who'll be led astray if they think his message is the truth. Kinda like how if you don't BTFO flat-earthers their schizo theories begin to take root amongst the less intelligent.
His mind isn't gone. He was always like that but he's totally leaned into being a media celebrity. His academic shit is behind him but he's a better media figure than the world deserves.
Checked.
See that comment.
>I don't. It's true.
You're "all women are ugly without makeup" talking point is an actual incel talking point, it's literally made up by ugly dudes to cope about not getting any. You have a problem with real women because you know they'll never really accept you as one. The main thing your posts are proving is the incel to troon pipeline is real.
I see what you mean. I meant that you're thinking of what a conventionally attractive woman who is also wearing makeup looks like and comparing that to a mental image of an unconventionally attractive assigned male at birth person who isn't wearing makeup. There are women who just look like men naturally without their makeup on and there are men who look like when with makeup on. Not acknowledging this creates an unintentional bias when you think about itm
>The clitoris is made out of the same organic tissue as a penis
Your foot is made out of the same organic tissue as your hand
Your penis is made out of the same tissue as my penis therefor I have your penis and I’m not giving it back.
They have more similarities than that, I was just too lazy to look up Jessica Pinn's essays on it after dissection cadavers and studying the biology of the clitoris
You pretended to understand Orwell and unironically force the idea that "both statements are true" when the wider discussion is about the cognitive dissonance entailed in the (ideological) justification of "her penis." Frick off.
Also, I genuinely feel sorry for you so if you're the same person posting about how passing is easy--I'm warning you that you're setting yourself up for extreme disappointment. Your value is in the fact you're a human being and not your gender ideology. Remember that when the time comes. You have inherent value.
Yes I have, many of them were very attractive, especially with clothes off.
>You've never seen a woman without her other and makeup on, huh?
Yes, I have seen plenty. They generally look better, as long as they're not post-wall roasties. Keep coping.
>I disagree
Also checked. It means you're delusional.
and then everybody on the bus clapped, truly, stunning...and brave
you never leave the house liar, your post should be held up as proof evident of troon mental illness
I don't know how old you are but in my suburban high school basically every dude was what YOU would describe as "right wing". In university it depends on the department, business is right wing as is hard stem, the rest is pozzed. Also frat houses are right wing af, don't delude yourself.
Do you like in like West Virginia or something?
British Columbia, university in Ontario.
> A leaf
Well, now I don't know how there could even be cool kids at your school. You live in Canada.
I was shaking from my experiences living in Minnesota & California btw
But if almost no one is on their side, how did things get to this point?
The transhumanist billionaires / economic elite shill it.
>raw footage is unfair
>acting like posting raw footage of trannies doesn't always lead to insanity and viewing it doesn't cause extreme discomfort
Cope.
>extreme discomfort
>the comments are all sucking his dick
Americans are a lost cause, just nuke that cursed continent
Frick off shill, I won't subscribe to the Daily Wire
You could make that claim, but as someone who grew up with the media socialization of the (anti) bush years, let me tell you this:
The christian "conservatives" of the early 2000s were nowhere near as widespread, obnoxious or destructive as the people Walsh is interviewing in this.
Just look at the protests they have. Today there was a "pride" parade in Vienna with 100k (!) people and I feel it is pretty safe to say that if you go in with the same question as Walsh, you would find a ton nutters among those. And that in a country that's not even at the heart of this whole thing. Quite the contrary actually (austria is a comparatively conservative country).
The folks Moore was ragging on about for years (le stupid white christians/conservatives), never had that kind of political traction.
So in the end it is not a balanced comparison really.
They never had that kind of political power, and they also were unironically right about basically everything.
>so hot...
so no one, ever
Who are you quoting?
The world is healing
True, Moore was never going to blame the real culprit (zionist psychos who surrounded Bush). What a fat fricking moron.
This documentary convinced me that the trans enablers are worse than the community itself. These gender hustlers are con artists and I pity poor souls who were manipulated by them.
Too bad Sam Hyde is a pro-troon closet liberal, he could have made this documentary instead of some Ben Shapiro boot licker like Matt Walsh.
No, s** h*** is a vicious racist neonazi frickstick who lives to opress POCs and LGBTQ+ folk. He literally gave neonazi websites 50,000$ and says the nword all day, not to mention "joking" about holocaust denial/revisionism. Frick you for making a joke of this.
Why do israelites rape kids?
They are satanic child abusers.
Frick off fascist butthole. S** H*** makes fun of LGBTQ+ folks all the time, have you even listened tpop a second popf him talk? Every other word from his mpputh is homophobic. Stop gaslighting.
why are you censoring sam hyde?
Cuz he's a literal neo-nazi and aligned with white supremacy so i dont legitimize him by sying his name.
oh, okay. i thought you had a crazy reason or something.
Sam has never uttered anything negative about transsexuals. It's his fetish. He is racist tho. Like those Nazis that all turned out to be closet cross-dressing homosexuals behind closed doors.
>like that israeli fiction
This documentary actually convinced me that gender theory is more right than wrong. The main premise this guy went around asking was for a definition of a woman. He can easily get that from a dictionary.
But when humans say they are a woman, for example, they are referring to their gender identity and not their sex assigned as birth. Yet, for some reason he keeps harping on that woman = female. It's apples and oranges.
Even the chicken example was ridiculous too. Our understanding of gender for humans has superseded biological definitions for sex, yet he purposely conflates it as well. We don't call female chickens "women" - they're not fricking humans.
Overall it was a pretty disingenuous piece of commentary but can totally get the appeal if you're still someone living in the past.
>muh gender identity isn't a mental illness
cope
This is true. But the real issue with gender theory isn't that it separates biological sex, with the social role that we call "woman", as gender. But that the theory implies that the two thing are indepent from each other.
>uuhhm if you redefine the dictionary and make up stupid shit then ackshually the dictionary is wrong
With a relativist attitude like that you can be convinced of literally anything as long as some academic cretin can make that shit up for you.
God fricking damnit anon, why are you such a fricking idiot!
>sex assigned as birth
You were already one of them, only you morons believe that sex is arbitrarily assigned and not a biological reality
>when humans say they are a woman, for example, they are referring to their gender identity
When i call someone a man or woman i refer to their sex, what the frick are you talking about
>Our understanding of gender for humans
If gender is whatever you want then it's wortheless
Can the troony spammer at least post a cute one like taftaj?
Well?
Damn, Adam Lanza went trans?
Imagine thinking putting on an obvious air of helpless feminine innocence detracts from the fact that's a mentally ill homosexual advocating genital mutilation. (inb4 it still has a wiener; this just underscores the absurdity).
I love trans women. Think I'll date one just so we can shower in conservative tears.
The Colombia one would get it.
Get It get it. Fricking hot
coomers like you need jail time
It's England or Brazil for me
That's because you've never seen a hot one in real life and you don't understand how makeup works.
>you've never seen a hot one in real life
no one has. because they aren't hot in real life. they look like men.
True. I used to see them when i took the bus, it was so obvious and cringe. They should be beaten tbh.
I see them in West Hollywood all the time.
>no one has
you probably have, but you couldn't tell, because they pass. that's what passing means. kinda how there are passing troony ecelebs but they never bring it up because they don't want to "blow" their cover
anon, they never pass in real life. everyone knows. even if they look "great" there is still something off about them, and it is immediately obvious that its the fact they're men.
How do you know you weren't just seeing a female then, idiot? None of them pass, all the photos you posted are cherrypicked and even then are questionable. How hard are you going to keep coping? YOU WILL NEVER BE A WOMAN, YOU ARE BELOW AN INCEL.
sai fora do meu país filho da puta
This is a Japanese website, speak English.
Lool
The real problem with trannies is the ugly ones.
No one. And I mean NO ONE. Would fear these ones in the picture going to a female bathroom or anything.
The ones In this pic would be accepted by everyone
>frick surgically manipulated intestinal tract to own the chuds
Keep posting the 0.00001% who somewhat pass in the right makeup and lightning. It makes the broad shoulder manface never-passing trannies who make up the bulk of the community want to off themselves even harder
> More examples ITT of hot trans girls than ugly ones
> 0.00001%
Brainlet
All trannies are ugly subhumans, especially when you take off makeup and clothes.
>cherry picking the minority represents the majority
Brainlet
The ugly ones are also cherry picked there's about an equal number of both and the ugly ones will eventually be a minority
trannies will always be ugly
LMAO I watch a ton of troony porn and let me tell you: the ones who want to pass will pass. The incel virgins who post selfies on reddit don't want to pass; they wanted to be accepted and praised. Big difference.
>Passing is easy and anyone can do it!
>The ones you see on social media are self-handicapping on purpose!
Complete and total delusion. Holy shit.
You're a mentally ill gay and no amount of coping and dilating will ever change that
I can see the obvious male bone structure even in all these heavily shopped cherry-picked pictures. You're just gay and like men.
You gays will tell yourself any lie to admit some trans girls are attractive and pass.
I honestly have never seen one. They'd have to be plastered in makeup and have significant surgery, then when i find out they're actually men it's all out the window kek
If trannies passed like this i would have no problem, but they don't, frick off, most trannies look like men
>but they don't, frick off, most trannies look like men
This reeks of trying to convince yourself that you aren't attracted to cute trannies.
I'd frick trannies if they passed and i'm a conservative, but where are they?
I'm not afraid of trannies or gays or non-whites, I just see the negative effects they have on society.
Troons try to convince themselves that "the chuds secretly want to frick them", even though everyone that hates them is just tired of them being pushed in every single form of media.
This guy has a bad case of gayface, I can't take him seriously.
he makes damn sure that everyone knows that he has a wife and kids and is totally not gay though.
Even if I agree with the intent, I still won't be watching this because of how ꜱoy this homie looks
>what if we talk about Biden's inflation 24/7 and destroy the Democrats in the elections to such a level we'll be allowed to kill trannies during the weekends?
>nah, better show how silly trannies can be
I think conservatives like to be the eternal sparring of globohomo.
crazy people
Everyone who's willing to argue that a man can become a woman is going to be a crazy person. All he did is let them talk at length so that viewers can see how ridiculous it is when it's all laid out, compared to what they usually hear, just platitudes and shaming tactics like calling people transphobes and bigots until they passively accept it
I hate this type of journalism, it's the same thing Louis Theroux and Channel 5 do, except mirrored.
Dunking on trannies will NEVER not be funny, but the style is kinda slimy.
Troons don't look like that at all though on the right of your image.
Left is pretty accurate to how troons actually look
>still can't get rid of those manly arms and shoulders
rip
if you saw that thing walking in public you'd instantly know it was a man. If gender is a social construct why is it so easy to tell? and why would you want to rewire the mind of the average human just so some weirdo doesn't get his feelings hurt?
>cherrypicked image
Again, the ones that want to pass will pass. Just accept it and move on.
>it happens you just can’t tell when it happens
Confirmation bias.
why does it look like the le pol face?
See
. Said more in 7 words. Cope.
The people are crazy but they are common in academia. These aren't homeless people on the streets, they are professors at universities. This is the establishment worldview they are espousing.
Um Hasan debunked this
how many trannies has he fricked?
>Effortlessly destroys Matt Walsh
>I too can win arguments with the other party not present.
>I won't use objective scientific fact to determine my world views
>2 x chromosomes
The Y chromosome is just an X chromosome that broke off part of itself. Technically everyone starts as female.
Yes. And people say only women have a desire to wear dresses. When you wear a dress people go: "Why are you wearing a dress? Men don't want to do that?" So eventually you go "Ok, I must not be a man, then, because I totally want to wear this dress "
So instead of going with "oh ok I'm a man so I won't wear dresses" you went with "I must chop my genitals off so I can wear dresses"?
I didn't chop my genitals off I just stopped identifying as a man. You're just talking about caving to peer pressure which is uniroically a social construct and not a demonstration of absolute truth.
That's actually what you did
You went from acting like science was on your side to rejecting science. Many such cases.
You don't know what a question is? What's step one say, bud?
>technically it's the same thing it just changed into something else
Oh man, more ~~*science*~~ from the same people who brought me thalidomide, accutane,"smoking is good for you", and "fat is bad for you". But it's not even from that field of esteemed scientists, it's from a field where you can't even reproduce half of their experiments because they're all based on bunk data that's manipulated in whichever way the grant money blows.
>Science is wrong sometimes
Is that the argument you're unironically going with?
>science is always right, don't question it!
Is that the argument you're going with?
I'm saying the entire field of "science" you're quoting is wrong at least 50% of the time from reproducibility studies that are being done.
>Not reproducible 50% of the time.
Show me then, I'd love to see your expertise that'll overpower observable reality.
>show me
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis
>inb4 no not those studies!
I don't know why you looped me into your response, but this does look interesting
She was probably being a jerk because of gender disphoria but that's good to know. She's cute AF but so is Amber Heard
>my made up theories about gender are observable reality
TOP KEK
Responding to point out a logical fallacy is a logical fallacy.
Well that's stupid, why use two words for it? it's just another way of enforcing your ego, you people are petty narcissists at the end of the day, aren't you?
Which logical fallacy is that? I'm not seeing how pointing out a logical fallacy could be a logical fallacy
The one you used was attacking character instead of addressing the argument
>The Y chromosome is just an X chromosome that broke off part of itself. Technically everyone starts as female.
how does this disprove gender?
>professor dave explains
TOP KEK
imagine listening to what this sniveling little worm of a man has to say beyond his explanations of orbitals or whatever. Academics are just good at repeating what the going theory is, they can't actually think or determine reality for themselves
Hope you aren’t religious.
Why?
>gender theories are objective scientific fact
>implying spiritual qualities such as male or female are purely quantifiable
Stop responding to me you low IQ lolcow.
He's literally offering zero counterpoints, he just says 'this guy is wrong'.
Also he even admits that transsexual is a brain disorder.
He explains that gender and sex are two different things and explains how Matt Walsh's arguments are wrong. You would know if you actually watched the video.
>gender and sex are two different things
Are you 13?
Sex and gender are two different things.
>He explains that gender and sex are two different things
Gender is a made up concept by pedophile John Money, it's pure nonsense.
If Charles Darwin did some bad things would that mean that evolution is a made up concept? No. Gender identity exists and has been around for thousands of years. This is such a moronic argument.
>Gender identity exists and has been around for thousands of years.
Do you mean gender or gender identity? the latter sounds like some gay shit made up by a israeli lesbian, not based on anything concrete.
My Aunt and Uncle watched it and their psychopathic, spoiled-rotten sjw daughter had a fit and said she was being abused.
Gender and gender identity are the same thing. They're a perception of oneself.
Are you a moron? The test case of the paedophile John Money was a failure he never identified as a girl despite not knowing he was a boy himself, being treated and dressed as a girl by his parents and peers he rejected the notion he was female and then eventually an heroed
>calls himself Professor as an appeal to authority to lure in viewers
>isn't a Professor in any way
Honestly, I don't get how that is legal.
He is a legit professor.
https://www.edweek.org/technology/professor-dave-explains-how-he-attracted-345-000-youtube-subscribers/2019/03
>He is a legit professor.
>trade university
Pick one.
>Farina, who taught in high school and undergraduate classrooms for 10 years before turning into a YouTuber, received a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from Minnesota’s Carleton College and a master’s in chemistry and science education at California State University.
Read the article, moron.
woah... a master's degree in teaching chemistry? damn, he must be really smart, just kidding HAAHAHAHAH
these are the types of idiots teaching that gender doesn't exist
Are you actually moronic or just pretending to be? Teaching in high school and being a TA at an institution doesn't make you a Professor. You realize being a Professor is an actual title? There are millions of people who teach at institutions who don't ever earn the distinction of being a Professor.
You are so BTFO on this I would just leave the thread tbh
I did read the article. "Trade university." Cope.
I'll bet you hate Jordan Peterson even though he taught at Harvard and U of T (which has one of the oldest and most distinguished psychology departments in the entire world). Cope.
It's not even about where he thought, the guy simply has never held any title anywhere that has the word Professor in it.
Jordan Peterson for example wasn't just teaching, he actually was a full Professor at University of Toronto.
Yeah, I know. I had him as a prof and he was highly respected as one before he transitioned (kek) into a career as a media figure. (I can criticize certain aspects of him, even based on personal experience, but he's a legit prof who also spent decades in the trenches personally helping people with severe mental illness as a clinical psychologist). He was also a research scientist studying the neurological pathways of addiction and wrote papers on the history of psychology alongside practical shit about counseling technique.
I'm sure he was good in his field, and he does have great speaker power. But he reveals himself to just be weak intellectually, like watching him speak with people like Penrose just reveals how average he is when you compare him to a true genius.
T average Cinemaphile schizo would appear more intelligent than Jordan Peterson did in that conversation, it was extremely strange to watch.
No, and there is nothing in what you linked that suggests he is a Professor. He doesn't even have a PhD.
I looked it up a long time ago and he has never held any title at any institution that has 'Professor' in it. Feel free to prove otherwise if you can, but it doesn't exist.
Why are left wingers so bad with things like logic and reasoning? They used to be well-educated, now they just repeat whatever schizophrenic worldview makes them feel less insecure.
Hope you’re not religious.
Why not? all of the greatest scientific minds believed in spirituality in some form, doesn't have to be religious.
>tip tip
There are a few semi-reasonable ones out there like Bill Maher, but they're in the minority nowadays.
>Crazy people
He interviews a congressman, a college dean, a surgeon, and a college professor. Yes, they're all crazy, but it's not the same as interviewing random people.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677266/
I would love to see you guys overturn an entire subdivision of neurobiology with your nonexistant expertise.
>interview crazy people
The majority of the people he spoke to are the "experts" some have been butchering kids for 20 years
Nobody outside of Cinemaphile has watched this
Those crazy people include two doctors and a university professor not some randoms on the street
I'd understand trannies a lot more if we stuck to a gender binary where they just jump between men<->women.
But all the 'gender is whatever you want it to mean' stuff doesn't make any sense to me.
Isn't gender ultimately just a category, because humans like splitting things into boxes based on certain traits? If the category has no traits associated with it then what purpose does it serve?
Sex isn't arbitrary, it has an exact line that can be drawn between one group and the other.
Ancient Romans already figured this out. They questioned what made a man a man and a woman a woman and ultimately ended up at biological sex and everything else is affectation. As the roles, behaviors, and secondary characteristics of the sexes isn’t consistent across the animal kingdom.
There's just more than two
I'm not confused, you just have an oversimplified understanding of the subject cooked with an intense emotional reaction that makes you unable to think clearly
>I'm not confused,
Are you male or female?
I identify as both simultaneously and have chimeric traits of both so biologically I am male and female
Bruh, everyone has masculine and feminine traits.
I absorbed my twin sister in the womb so I think mine are more pronounced. If not, though then that still supports my identity since you're admitting everyone has traits of both
Sorry bruh, you’re not special.
>I identify as both simultaneously and have chimeric traits of both so biologically I am male and female
Yes, my friend used to think she was a cat, and this autistic kid used to think he was donkey kong, but are you male or female? It doesn't matter what you identify as, that's just narcissism and wanting to be special. The fact that you can't answer this simple question proves that you are deeply confused.
I did answer it
Ok, still Bigender
So the basis of your delusional mindset is “absorbing your sister in the womb.” That happens pretty often and there’s no correlation between it and transgenderism.
So you don't even know what gender you are?
>Bigender
Not a thing, just a made-up label.
These lunatics can't even keep things consistent nowadays you have non-binary trannies how does that work? How can say you have no gender while at the same time you claim to be another gender than what you are
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_paradox
>Russell's paradox shows that every set theory that contains an unrestricted comprehension principle leads to contradictions.
The categories of male and female inevitably fails because -any- rigid attempt at categorization eventually falls apart, because categories are a creation of the human imagination and not part of objective reality, where everything is actually just energy existing at different states
GG NO RE
>The exception proves the rule
If you want to win this "trans women/men debate are women/men" debate you just need to ask extreme hypotheticals, for example:
If every single person on the planet currently alive performed an instant sex reassignment surgery such that all men became women and all women became men, how many human babies would be born in the future?
Frick off kant.
Not bad