>IS THAT AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENT GENERATED IMAGE IN MY MEDIA!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
>IS THAT AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENT GENERATED IMAGE IN MY MEDIA!!!
most college graduates these days are artificially intelligent
Holy hecking John Oliver. Updoot for you
John Oliver uses appeal to authority in all of his shows though
It was a pretty decent movie and somehow comfy.
The 70s was a comfy decade
The level of characterization for the cast was really nice.
Jack Delroy is a classic example of a monkey’s paw story where his pursuit for fame led to him to ruin. It seemed pretty clear to me that he didn’t plan on losing his wife when he made the deal, and was also using this show as a way of finding some sort of closure with losing his wife in addition to increasing his ratings.
The sidekick is a guy who disagrees with the direction the host has gone in, but is ultimately no different than him as he still chose to continue working with him despite his conscience.
The psychologist claims to be a noble person not wanting to see the possessed girl exploited, but at the same time brings her on a show to be exploited.
The skeptic guy isn’t someone who actually cares about pursuing the truth, and just grifts the entire movie to avoid acknowledging the obvious so he can keep his money. Great depiction of a fedora tipping redditor who claims to be all for the “truth” only to lose all credibility by refusing to acknowledge reality. Also very fitting that when confronted he immediately pledges servitude to the devil and thinks material wealth will save him.
The spirit medium at the start is a classic example of a conman who lies to people who have lost loved ones, but faces karma when he does actually become possessed.
The producer is another sort of satanic figure who exploits the tragedies people go through to further push Jack into fame.
The possessed girl doesn’t really have a character, and is more so a stand-in for people who get dragged into the limelight when they are best just being left alone and helped. Had any of the characters actually done the right thing then most of them wouldn’t have died, and that’s very much intentional commentary on the film’s part.
>The sidekick is a guy who disagrees with the direction the host has gone in, but is ultimately no different than him as he still chose to continue working with him despite his conscience.
I found it apt that his attempt to ward off the demon isn't a real prayer or evocation of Christ but quoting from a pop culture movie he saw.
my only issue is they didn't know how to end it and it turned into the horror equivalent of jazz hands.
honestly, this is how i would fixed the ending:
>the Halloween episode ends
>documentarians endcap the documentary portion of the movie to show what the public knew
>it was a hit, he climbed the social ladder and eventually got Carson's gig.
>grew old, died, being considered on of the greats of Late Night
>cut back to backstage, after that episode
>they were all fraudsters, they all get paid, implied he's definitely fricking the psychiatrist and they are all kind of pieces of shit that justify lying about the supernatural because it entertains people
>but the dialogue makes it more clear that they care more about how it advances their careers than entertaining people
>host says the forgot the skull dagger prop on the stage, he goes to get it
>comes through the curtains, realizes its the beginning of another taping, time has fast forwarded, he's clearly disoriented by it
>before he can figure it out, he's in another episode, that way you can still have basically the crazy shit you saw at the end
>still basically haunted by his dying wife in bed like in the cut
>but this time, we have a flashback to the actual moment that he's young, in the woods with the cult, making a pact with the devil for success
>find out that this is what hell is like for him, just reliving the episodes, being reminded that he traded his wife for a successful life, now that life is over, and eternal torture beckons
>now its literally Late Night, with the Devil, cue title card
>cut to someone watching the last episode it before the title card, but its normal, but from the view of some dude now watching it on YouTube, for like 5-10 seconds so that you realize that's all his life amounted to now, in 2024
>credits
correcting to make a little more clear:
>title card hits
>cut back to the last episode before the title card, but its the normal recording, not the Hell version
.>pans out, its some dude now watching it on YouTube on his computer
>this is all Jack's life amounts to now, in 2024
>hangs for like 5 tto10 seconds, then credits
For me I wanted it was just a prank ending
Prank ending would mean the butthole skeptic would win and be right. I really wanted to see him get his.
i dont read the news or social media, whats going on in regards to the use of AI and this film?
The movie features AI generated title cards when it cuts to its fake commercial breaks. They're kinda shitty looking, but they're on screen for a total of like 5 seconds throughout the movie.
Any moron with Photoshop skills could could whip that up in 15 minutes without using AI
>15 minutes
vs
>15 seconds
yeah and how long does it take to make a movie?
about 45 minutes less thanks to the ai images
That will be 500$ plus tip, thak you sir
Then you deal with gays that call themselves graphic designers for using photoshop.
This movie fricking sucked but this is the cherry on top. Sorry I bought a ticket.
Halal Oween?
Reference to the owl leader grove cult
Pyewacket, whoever the frick that is
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extelligence
Literally who is autistic enough to notice these and identify they are AI. I saw this movie in theaters and would have no idea. I strongly feel this info was fed to someone online to cause outrage. If someone is that autistic to identify this in 5 seconds they have way more serious problems in life
>this info was fed to someone
Movies have to register these things in the credits which are public.
Outrage started when the movie was not released yet
Outrage started over one year ago when it released?
Either way these things are publicly available before release.
The movie was not released normally over a year ago. Only at a festival. And then my point still stands who was autistic enough to notice this in an environment where you could only watch the movie once.
Do you think people learned about movies by sitting and reading the credits as they scroll by?
lol
lmao
The jack-o’-lantern’s look like shit and obviously ai generated
are you seriously pretending it's not easy to observe that a picture is AI-generated...?
they were just lazy
sir, you are just nitpicking
I spend hours of my life looking at this image and would never realize it's made by an AI
please calm down sir
Sovlless
To be fair it would have taken them an hour to draw
I would bet any amount of money that the reason they used AI to make like 4 shit tier images is solely to cause a big press shitstorm for PR because until today it was the only thing I heard about this movie. Also it was good.
I think an AI generated David Lynch film would be fricking awesome
saw this movie last weekend, and while i enjoyed it, i found it's inability to fully stick with with found footage/lost media format to be disappointing, it's unfortunate that the director couldn't find a way to tell the story wholly within the confines of a "lost Halloween special video tape" premise that the movie is carried by. i give it a 7.5/10
Just watched it with my mate, and this was our exact conclusion too. Like, Comparing it to the Blair witch project really highlights the lack of creativity in modern filmmaking
it's a good movie but something is lacking from it
I can't say it's kino
>AIEEEE LEAVE THE RICH PEOPLE ALONNE
>Anti-capitalists when they think AI will fight capitalism
A middling V/H/S segment dragged out for an hour and a half. Dogshit
people that defend ai art are people that have zero artistic or creative skill whatsoever, whether it be a genetic abnormality in the brain or socioeconomic, they were raised that way or they have some psychological fear of learning a new skill. Or they are just plain low iq.
It's the easiest way i've found to spot dunning-krugers. Since being a dunning-kruger is essentially being a no skills "idea guy" that overestimates their abilities.
k
its just lazy and shows they didnt really care besides making a quick buck. thats the horror genre for you. if anything, the controversy helped to put it on the map. congratulations, you all were part of this little marketing stunt.
Isn't A.I satan?
it's made in australia where the BRITS SENT ALL OF THEIR UNDESIRABLES
>australians MAKE A SUCCESSFUL movie made for a dime
>BRITANS BEHAVE LIKE b***hES AND COMPLAIN
lol, lmao even
not a single good original independent brit movie in about 10 years, if not more
some good amstrad style programmig, keep on LOSING
The California homosexuals are completely losing their minds over AI. I recently pirated a few new indie games and they all come with disclaimers that they're not using AI and you just look at the art it looks like shit and I don't see how anyone would have assumed it was AI made, and the game just sucks and has discord links everywhere and every time you boot it up they have these unskippable cringe anti-AI messages and thanking their team like they can't put that shit in the credits
How is AI art any different than graphic artists who 90% of the time are just slapping together a bunch of pre-rendered designs?
It's better
How is western professional cg any different than pajeet sweatshop cg?
which was ai image used?
Actual letterboxd review of this movie
>I'm genuinely crying...
AHAHAHA!
Imagine if Letterboxed allowed people to post selfies of themselves getting all emotional or angry. These people are deranged.
>crying over a movie ticket and taxi fare
>must consoom
Don't Stop The Goyslop
Why do you homosexuals never give the names of the movies you post?
why do you gays never reverse search the image in google?