Is there a mandate for producers to start using ai now? Why even risk the controversy?

Is there a mandate for producers to start using ai now?
Why even risk the controversy?

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They are testing waters. It’s inevitable and everyone wants to be first but knows they gonna make people mad so it’s a game of chicken

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If AI becomes the norm, then actor/writer strikes evaporate like a fart in the wind.

    However, judges have already ruled that stuff made by AI can’t be copyrighted, so there are a few legal hurdles to jump over still.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Raw AI output can't be copyrighted. Doesn't invalidate copyright on the entire film, though.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >judges have already ruled that stuff made by AI can’t be copyrighted
      troll harder

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's honestly baffling. After all the backlash before this, did some moron really go "Yeah we'll just generate the title cards on dall-e real quick. Nobody'll notice :^)"

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      looks like shit

      I don't care about jobs. Its ugly and satanic. I'm not going to pay to look at something that's ugly and satanic

      AI bros... They're laughing at us... I can feel my funky monkeys depreciating even further!!

      How does it make you feel to know that in the future you will no longer be able to tell what is real? The world will finally be taken away from man, his mind, and his senses and given to algorithms, corporations, and governments.

      Brains rotted by the culture wars

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why? I dont want that. Please tell me why

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This. You would think after the writers guild went to strike because of AI that they would realize it is a touchy subject.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What controversy? Your busted butthole?

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    looks like shit

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      AI bros... They're laughing at us... I can feel my funky monkeys depreciating even further!!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      1970s tv graphics looked like shit.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        different shit

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        1970s graphics may have been more simplistic and low budget, but didn’t look unintentionally distorted

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This was also from the 1970s and looks way better than whatever they attempted to do.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      no it does not, it's period accurate. let's see you do better human.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      A simple drawing would’ve been way better.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This. They already have artists and designers on the team, just generate the template with AI and have people make the final product so that it doesnt look like ass

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Because why care? The controversy is specifically down to a minority that will eventually be broken down and the majority already doesn't give a shit.

          They could've just used clip art even.
          >It was an experiment
          What a bunch of horseshit, they probably just had an afterthought to have intertials and did them as fast and as cheap as they could because they never really cared about these moments..

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Would she do it for free like the AI?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          can't imagine AI use for corporate use will be free either

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You could probably convince an artist to only get like 100 dollars for a decent drawing and save yourself the bad PR

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Would she do it for free like the AI?
          of course not. it's all about money, not about artistic integrity for the seething artgays.
          every single one of them can still make their art with AI around, but they can't make money off it.
          all the lefty artgays turned into giga capitalists when it comes to AI.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Maybe she shouldn't have mocked blue collar workers when they were made obsolete. something something then there was no one left to speak out for me

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wait, *this* is what people are b***hing about?

      A simple drawing would’ve been way better.

      >this could have been a dream job for someone like me
      Lol oh no, now you'll have to wait tables like a commoner because you have no marketable skills!

      I'm starting to like AI already.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        But he's totally right, art keeps getting shittier and shittier because producers israelites want to see how cheap they can make everything. Like look at Memphis Corporate. That's what's created with this type of thinking this is just the next step down.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The difference between this

          looks like shit

          and this

          looks like shit

          is negligible.

          AI looks surreal, and sometimes it's more interesting human art. Take this Kanye video, for example. It's actually one of the best music videos I've ever seen.

          %3D%3D

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            *than human art

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I agree, the way it fricks things up looks really cool, but not in every context. A 19th century period piece with discernable AI goop would ruin the effect of it all

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >A 19th century period piece with discernable AI goop would ruin the effect of it all
              Unless it's a 19th century period piece about theosophists experimenting with psychedelics.

              That would actually be pretty cool. I wanna see that now.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                AI goop looks a lot like the things you see on psychedelics, this could work

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          people were making the exact same complaint about stuff like this

          This was also from the 1970s and looks way better than whatever they attempted to do.

          when it was new

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        AI art sources from actual art. If everyone stopped making new art, AI would just regurgitate the same shit over and over.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Frick around on dall-e enough, you realize it is.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you don't have to turn everything into culture war owning the snowflakes nonsense, some practices just suck ass, stop defending greedy corpos

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I've known enough artists to know they're all narcissists. I can't help but take pleasure in the less talented among them realizing their irrelevance.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why would they leave it in when it looks so bad?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      wow, this actually looks like shit, they could have used some of the better more recent A.I but this already looks very dated

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The movie was finished and started screening a year ago at festivals, this was probably generated in Summer or Fall of 2022.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I've generated better slop than this and even then I wouldn't dare use it in an official production.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Knowing this is AI ruins it for me. Why wonder about things like who those people are or what theyre doing when I know there was never intention like that behind it? I cant pick out small details and piece together a larger puzzle because so little of what is there is intentional. AI is good for templates and corporate branding and nothing else

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          To be fair, there is intention behind it in that it's meant to be a character from a fantasy story I'm writing. There is gratification in seeing the characters and scenes from my story illustrated instantly with the simple typing of a prompt, even if imperfectly, but I'd never use them as "official art" of my project.

          wow, is this A.I? i actually wouldn't mind this as background art, it actually looks believable unlike the true detective shit show

          I think using rough brush strokes in the prompt was my way of cheating. It allows the image to look detailed while also masking the imperfections you'd typically see in AI slop.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Those pics are pretty cool. Personally I'd have no problem using them in a book if I wanted illustrations.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Thats actually a pretty good use i never thought of, sorry to sound so dismissive

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              It's a healthy reflex when appraising art. My view is ai slop can be a fun little toy to stimulate the imagination or just generate goofy shit for memes like "security camera footage of a ghetto pokemon battle in a waffle house at 3am" or "disco elysium reimagined as a kubrick film circa 1974", but it's tacky when used for a non-profit project and unethical when used professionally, like in Late Night with the Devil.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Great. Stay Mid forever gaybro.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Mid
            have a nice day

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        wow, is this A.I? i actually wouldn't mind this as background art, it actually looks believable unlike the true detective shit show

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I wonder what that moron bauman is gonna say

      He said the movie looks good
      but he really hates AI.
      Mike will probably love it. He loves the slop.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is most of the kvetching about AI filler coming from people in the industry?

    This is such a non-issue.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't care about jobs. Its ugly and satanic. I'm not going to pay to look at something that's ugly and satanic

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Have you tried being less moronic?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Its ugly and satanic
        dude, it's an horror movie

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How does it make you feel to know that in the future you will no longer be able to tell what is real? The world will finally be taken away from man, his mind, and his senses and given to algorithms, corporations, and governments.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >How does it make you feel to know that in the future you will no longer be able to tell what is real?
        I'm not too concerned about it. What is real, anyway?

        I'm not in the mood to get into philosophy or quantum physics right now, but you should consider the possibility that nothing you perceive with the senses is absolutely real.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I'm well aware of the limits of perception, but if I want to live a healthy life I have to recognize a tree for what it is when I see one. I'm talking about what we can know for certain within the bounds of the world we perceive. Mass protests in the street in reaction to a video of something that never happened.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Deepfake videos are only loosely related to what we're discussing here.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Doubts about reality filtered through my perception are enough for me. I don't want another layer

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You're acting like video and audio recordings are some sort of eternal fact of life humans wouldn't be able to live without, it's existed for a short span of time and it's been fakeable for about as long.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Sure. But for as long as audio/video/images are a part of our lives I'll still be no less upset by the idea that everything I watch could realistically be fake. Have some principles.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If what you're watching is supposed to be entertainment and not factual news, what difference does it make if it is fake, but still entertaining?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine thinking you can tell what is real even now.
        https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-universe-is-not-locally-real-and-the-physics-nobel-prize-winners-proved-it/
        see also: Plato

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Youre missing the point. See

          Sure. But for as long as audio/video/images are a part of our lives I'll still be no less upset by the idea that everything I watch could realistically be fake. Have some principles.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Is there a mandate for producers to start using ai now?
    They shot to film in like late 2022/early 2023, and have been screening it as film festivals for like a year.
    >Why even risk the controversy?
    Most controversy for AI shit with True Detective and Secret Invasion were just people b***hing. There were minor calls for boycotting Secret Invasion, but nobody was really watching it anyways, so using minor AI shit was generally a non-issue when it was made and through the film being shown at festivals. Even now, there's no call for boycotting Fallout which used AI for advertising. How could the producers have known that people would randomly decide to single out and get really pissy at an indie movie?

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Probably. They're pushing it where I work.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Where can I watch this? Im a leaf and a clueless boomer. Help me reddit

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can't believe we're living in the last era of real movies before they become complete auto-generated AIslop.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't care about culture war shit i just hate it when a movie's whole deal is to look like an old piece of media but they throw in shit like that obvious AI drawing, same with stuff like CG blood spurts or fake "film" filters

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Communists demand that film directors avoid cost-cutting measures

    Explain this

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Corporate executives and investors are dumb and just follow trends. AI is the current big trend so companies are making big AI announcements as investor bait regardless of whether AI fits their business or not.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    true detective season 4 used AI to write the thing

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Videogames pushed shit using this strategy for decades. You just eat the controversy, carry on, and before long the controversy is not only forgotten, but the existence of the original sin is used by fans to justify the future ones.

    >Oblivion launches with day one DLC
    >outrage
    >Bethesda just doesnt give a shit
    >fast forward
    >Any game comes out with day one dlc: "Bruh, you didn't care when Oblivion had it. Why do you care now?"

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Using AI in a movie
    What fricking lazy homosexuals, frick this stupid movie

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is literally the future. AI is already being used In so many different jobs and it gets better and more accessible people will continue to use it. I don’t understand why people really think entertainment industry isn’t going to use AI when other lines of work already do. Video games, movies, books, music eventually even music videos and social media posts will all be using AI. People act like they want to stop this from becoming the norm but won’t pressure government officials to create laws to protect our job security from AI

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Work with plenty of artists against AI.
      Their Twitter opinions are much more hostile than their actual opinions. Some mention being pro-AI or having AI art second accounts but publicly are against it because their friends and followers are (in 4 separate cases, those friends/clients of mine had the exact same opinion). Then you have some who are "anti AI" but use AI tools, occasionally ignorant to the fact they are algorithmic tools like upscalers and color correctors and so on (so anti-Stable Diffusion-type AI, not anti-AI in general). I think the actual anti-AI contingent is 1/4 the size at most that Twitter would have you believe. The genuine anti-AI types actually have sympathetic reasons too, mostly about the danger of all media being fake and of human creative expression being ignored for instant gratification. For the most part, anti-AI is easy brownie points, helped extensively by how autistic AI bros are when they can't read the room or think an octopus-fingered abomination is worth sharing publicly.
      It's the job losses people care about the most, especially in a society without substantial social safety nets or desirable alternatives. AI threatens people's jobs, and solidarity is what people engage in.
      If that wasn't a danger and if AI was 3x better in quality, I don't think the anti-AI sentiments would be as strong. But we don't live in that world, so people will be hostile but demoralized.

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Almost positive a Batman Comic (official DC) just released a comic using tons of AI art…

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What images?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Have you tried reading the thread?

      looks like shit

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No I didn't, but thanks

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    let the shilling begin
    although this does look interesting

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *