Is there anything that we can do to prevent this movie from becoming lost media permanently?

Is there anything that we can do to prevent this movie from becoming lost media permanently?

There's so many lost movies, books, TV shows, etc from studios handling them poorly and I don't want this movie to be put into that pile I mean for frick's sake it's 2024 lost media shouldn't be being made in this year

There's got to be some way to save this movie there's no way that someone doesn't have a spare copy in the back on a USB drive

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    james gunn is probably the only one that could make something happen

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      But would he be willing to risk losing his job?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        i don't know, but i wouldn't want to work for WB if i was him at this point

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >we have to ally with Gunn to save CvACME
      We're like Batman having to team up with Joker for some reason.

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    everything that consumers could do has been done

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      But they all got rejected with no second offers

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not really. You can boycott WB and tell them exactly why. Fricking with their cash is the only thing these people understand

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Good luck trying to do that

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    best plot for an original kids move I heard of in years

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Someone would have to leak it, right?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, but it would have to be someone at the studio

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        The rough cut is probably on a hard drive. Who knows if it's air gapped or not. The North Koreans stole a ton of data and rough cuts of movies in their James Franco hack. Hollywood is stupid so they probably didn't learn their lesson. Might be on a cloud or internal sever. A clever person could probably get a hold of it. I'm guessing the physical drive and server would be near Burbank.

        SFX houses, editors and composers also get huge chunks of the rough cut to do their job. Those people don't know anything about security. It would be strange if someone got inside their systems to look around. Maybe piece together a complete film.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          But we don't want the rough cut or any edits we want the full completed movie

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    i did cancel max and gave this as the reason. as well as the other stuff they're removing

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      losing Frisky Dingo was tragic

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        meant for

        just torrent it zoom zoom frickwit

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    media would get cancelled and shelved forever long before this. Frick snydercut gays.

    • 3 months ago
      Chungus amongus

      Isn't that also how and why so many silent films were burned too anon?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Those were burned by accident or via incompetence. Before video and TV and the concept of reruns and rentals, very few movies were popular enough to be re-released and they were put in the vault or just tossed in the trash if the studio didn't have space or money to store it. In those days, film was extremely flammable. So accidental fires and explosions were common because of how unstable the storage was.

        It's not that they were canceled. There just wasn't any money in storing something that would not have any re-sale value until many decades later.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          I mean you do have a point but what I don't get is we're not in that era anymore so why are they still trying to delete films

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            They get a tax write-off. A similar thing happened to a movie called 'Hippie Hippie Shake' starring Cillian Murphy which was meant to release nearly 15-years ago; "After the box-office failure of Green Zone (2010), Working Title's parent company, Universal Pictures, wrote off this movie in an attempt to partially off-set that movie's loss of over one hundred million dollars. The insurers reportedly stipulated that the original camera negative be destroyed." But even if the original negative is destroyed there would still surely be a digital copy of the movie on a hard-drive somewhere.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              If it's been 15 years and it hasn't been found it's gone forever

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          this is a communist lie used to justify the "missing" italian futurist films

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    You don't think maybe it's just terrible like Batgirl would have been?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      no. the executives didn't even watch it.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      The concept is kino

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    You're gonna need a crack team of professional thieves

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bros... it's time to put together a team.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Anon v. Coyote v. Acme

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bros has it ever occurred to you this is just a publicity stunt?
    Would you really have cared about this movie otherwise?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes and yes.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nah, you're assuming too much competence on the part of movie execs

      Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Bros has it ever occurred to you this is just a publicity stunt?
      At first yes, but it has gone too far for that now.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Other than for #SupportAnimation reasons, why are people clamoring for this to be released? Live action Looney Tunes crossovers have a notoriously bad track record and this sounds like some Tom and Jerry 2021 level slop. They probably barely have the toons in it and cheaply recycle classic gags just like the Tom and Jerry movie too.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Also the animation is done in that shitty cel shaded style the Chip n Dale tried passing off as “2D”, you just know that wouldve rubbed people wrong

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    just torrent it zoom zoom frickwit

  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    WB wanted 60 million for it
    so we start a kickstarter that raises 60 million.
    oh wait...no one here would spend any money on this movie anyways

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >WB wanted 60 million
      Didn't it cost them half that? And weren't they trying to sell it for 30 to Amazon/Netflix?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        no they wanted 60 million and only got 30 million as an offer when they tried to sell it.
        Regardless of the amount, no one here would spend money to get it released.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          I don't get this business model, they made a whole movie before even having a distribution deal? even the worst trash managed to get into theaters, so what happened here exactly? either somebody was extremely dumb or extremely smart and just wanted the tax write-off

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >before even having a distribution deal?
            Do they even need one? They've got HBO.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              apparently they must have pitched it as something sellable if they are shelving it because no one wants to buy it at their price

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            They made the movie assuming it would be in theaters
            New guy comes in and sees that the film isn’t good (or maybe it is good but he doesn’t think audiences will care) and just wants to get rid of it

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              >New guy comes in and sees
              We know he didn't watch it.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah I’m sure the film is amazing.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              I only know the title of the movie but it absolutely doesn't sound like theater material. they should have just started off as direct to streaming liek disney did with that Chip 'n' Dale movie. in fact your own proprietary platform seems like the perfect place to dump these metapieces.
              so overall it was probably someone being indeed stupid and at some point they saw it was just more profitable to do the write-off

  13. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't care about that, but I hope someone will leak the pilot episode of that Powerpuff Girls live action. The script alone was dumpster fire kino.

  14. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Getting a tax write-off for a film or show should result in immediate release to the public domain. Essentially, through the tax write-off, everyone is paying for part of its creating, therefore everyone owns part of it. This will either discourage this behavior or, at the least, let people see what was allegedly so bad we all had to cover paying for it.

  15. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >becoming lost media
    if it was never released

    it was never lost to begin with.

  16. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    someone would have to overpay to force WB hand. it would be too embarrasing for them if its successful

  17. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    they should make it so that if a studio is going to scrap a movie for tax purposes, the film automatically enters the public domain. i think that would be reasonable enough.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *