Is there some kind of new law that forbids showing same-race (passing) heterosexual couples in Cinemaphile media or something, I feel like I haven't seen any in 5+ years
Not even in just original IPs, new adaptations of century old media and pairings also have to be changed to not appear same-race
>moron just now becomes aware of californian marxists
/thread
take your meds
Bet you alone are on more meds than all of them together.
DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) mandate promoted by the 3 multinational investment companies (blackrock, vanguard and state street) who own the largest share of 88% of the companies on the s&p 500.
I mean you can have diversity without mandating 98% of all couples depicted in (kids') media being mixed race
The greater the diversity, the higher the score the investment firms give them. And if it's diverse main characters that also helps the score. Superman is expected to be white but having the two other main characters be non-white gives them the best score they can get without making Superman black.
What I never understood about this is, most studios, at least the ones we talk about, make enough money to break even, or usually far more than that. So if they have ALL this money, why still bother with investors?
For live action movies in the last 5 years you've got Thor, Doctor Strange, Shang Chi, Aquaman, and Dark Phoenix, and I'm probably forgetting a few.
>Thor, Doctor Strange, Shang Chi, Aquaman
Literally none of these have same-race heterosexual couples as the focus
>and Dark Phoenix
Haven't seen this one, I don't think anyone has
oh no you had to start adding autistic qualifiers to your original point after you got proven wrong
Showing that the parents of a non-mixed actor's character are not a mixed couple doesn't count, background extras don't count
>Thor
The entire movie is about Thor and Jane
>Doctor Strange
Strange's character growth is learning to let go of Doctor Palmer
>Shang Chi
Shang Chi and Awkwafina denying they're a couple for an hour and a half
>Aquaman
You're moving your goal-posts you whiny pissbaby. When did "forbids showing" turn into "focus"?
>Dark Phoenix
Cyclops and JEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAN
>The entire movie is about Thor and Jane
Previously established ex couple that doesn't reconcile
>Strange's character growth is learning to let go of Doctor Palmer
Previously established ex couple that doesn't reconcile
>Shang Chi and Awkwafina denying they're a couple for an hour and a half
Not a couple
>You're moving your goal-posts you whiny pissbaby. When did "forbids showing" turn into "focus"?
Because one would be a logistical nightmare for something ultimately unimportant while the other could be the target of an agenda
>Cyclops and JEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAN
Haven't seen it
By that same measuring stick, Batman and Catwoman are not a couple in The Batman, so that doesn't count. Oh and Spider-Man and MJ don't end up together so that doesn't count. And Superman and Lois aren't a couple (at least not yet) so that doesn't count.
this is some bazinga level shit, you fricking tourist
Clearly you're just going to shift the goal post even further cause you're a brainlet arguing in bad faith but in addition to those
>Loki
Loki and Silvie
>Ant-Man and the Wasp
>Ant-Man Quantamania
Scott and Hope and Janet and Hank
>Venom
The main guy and his girlfriend
>Black Panther
T'challa and his spy girlfriend
>Spider-Verse 2
Pavitir and Gayarti, Peter and MJ
>She-Hulk
She-Hulk and Daredevil
if you're going to count Bruce and cat Woman in that film than these 2 count by the same metric
>Wandavision
Wanda and human!Vision
>Previously established ex couple that doesn't reconcile
But they do.
Which ones?
They're not the same race, stupid blind man.
Seems really dishonest to include continuing couples from older movies, especially when it comes to Thor and Strange. The latter's love interest ends up married to a black guy.
Ant-Man and The Wasp but the third movie flopped
>No reply even though it's the perfect example
Poor Ants and Wasp being too niche. On that note Ant-Man 2 would have been 100% better as a straight up love triangle between Scott, Ghost and Hope.
They were established in the previous movies though, had they broken them up arbitrarily it would've been to obvious
>Ant-Man and The Wasp but the third movie flopped
Same race mixing is boring
I enjoyed the first two Ant-Man movies. I purposely did not go and see the third because black Kang was in it.
Been a tad longer but yeah there has been a huge push to portray interrace couples in media. It's in all commercials too.
Basically it's just more studios pandering to the Twitter crowd since they think that means extra views or they can brag about being extra progressive if it gets them another dollar. There's no more social engineering plotting beyond that.
Inbreeding increases the chance of birth defects in the offspring.
so does shagging after you hit 30 yet here we are with frozen sperm, eggs, and normalgays with broken dreams PATHETIC
>Genetically made to be Peter's biological mate and have his babies.
>Wants the Peter to *Plap* her from just a few seconds of being next to each other.
Mary Jane sisters not like this.
What do you expect, it's basically illegal to be white and straight in 2023 America.
>Not even in just original IPs, new adaptations of century old media and pairings also have to be changed to not appear same-race
Lastman
>Cinemaphile media
>only examples provided are capeshit
You're free to name examples from cartoons or comics, especially new IPs
>Is there some kind of new law that forbids showing same-race (passing) heterosexual couples in Cinemaphile media or something, I feel like I haven't seen any in 5+ years
yes
>Is there some kind of new law that forbids showing same-race (passing) heterosexual couples in Cinemaphile media or something
No. Writer just do what they want.
And studios only hire writers who want to do what the studios want to do