sounds like it would be really boring. if you have a dual screen setup you could play GTA 5 or Fortnite in the other tab while you watch it, if not you can just go on TikTok on your phone while you watch it, I usually do this if its a movie made before 2010
I think the main problem that stopped it from becoming big was the release of star wars around the same time. Also Friedkin for some reason denied that it was a remake of wages of fear even though it clearly is. Also can’t recommend the film enough one of the most atmospheric films I’ve ever seen
its kino of the highest order
Schematic Friedkin slop.
its okay
great soundtrack though: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gh9aeF4TSc
Yes, definitely. Unbelievably kino
Yes
It's one of those movie Cinemaphile tricked me into watching. Two hours of my life wasted.
locked
Keyed
>1970s
>2 hours long
sounds like it would be really boring. if you have a dual screen setup you could play GTA 5 or Fortnite in the other tab while you watch it, if not you can just go on TikTok on your phone while you watch it, I usually do this if its a movie made before 2010
Watch the original.
>Is this a film worth watching?
Si. Top tier kino.
Also this
Not her, but what Friedkin denied was that this was a remake of THE FILM Wages of Fear. But this is of course an adaptation of THE BOOK Wages of Fear.
Just going in knowing the title is heavily deceptive
It's really good.
Play the movie at your next screening, homosexual
Didn't people back then hate it and generally agreed that wages of fear was the better movie?
Poster looks great though.
I think the main problem that stopped it from becoming big was the release of star wars around the same time. Also Friedkin for some reason denied that it was a remake of wages of fear even though it clearly is. Also can’t recommend the film enough one of the most atmospheric films I’ve ever seen
>Friedkin denied it was a remake
even though it says "based on wages of fear" in the end credits
That's right.
OK then
I mean it’s just probably Friedkin being gay about semantics. He adapted the book not the original film
Having seen the movie, I can think of one thing wrong with that title.
HIS TRUCK GOT EXPLODED BY A FRICKING SORCERER
Yeah, it's great. Just be conscious that the prologue is pretty extensive and yes, you are watching the right movie.
Haven't seen this one, but original still holds the frick up. Highly recommended if you don't have ADHD.
OP watch this one, it is the ultimate KINO
that's why they are still doing remakes to this day.
Can’t wait for them to totally botch the upcoming remake
watch the version with Roy Schneider in it (he's the main guy from Jaws)
They actually put a disclaimer to the american posters saying there is no magic in the film
why are americans so moronic
I made it up
So what you're saying is, it's not real?
wagies of fear is NOT better than sorcerer
i agree i enjoy both films but i think sorcerer is superior
well, frick you too, then, you poser and contrarian