Bullshit, you can't discuss films anywhere without one of these bumbling morons mentioning him. That goes for music too. Anything with twangy guitar sound you can expect to see a "this could be in Tarantino film!" comment.
He might be the most recognizable, but I bet most zoomers also know Steven Spielberg, Ridley Scott, Martin Scorsese, James Cameron, Wes Anderson, Christopher Nolan and Michael Bay.
moronic millenial homosexual, zoomers are the most literate when it comes to movies compared to previous generations. Probbaly only rivaled by the silent generation
Zoomers are the most moronic generation. I doubt they could even watch a film in it's entirety without looking at their phones or pausing the movie to come back it later. Their attention span is fricked because of the constant stream of dopamine they get from watching tiktok videos
I go to cinema all the time and only old people are there. Zoomers only care if it's capeshit or another vin diesel tier over the top slop. A live action anime is the top slop on Netflix, I don't need to say more.
The fact is this.
Tarantino is the only director today who is both >popular / makes films known to the general public >has a distinctive style
The lay public CANNOT tell you who directed the last several marvel movies, because they're all shot identically. Same with DC, they're stylistically cloned faranchise pieces. But okay, those are slop. Horror movies? Maybe you you can name the studio (Blumhouse, A24 have some distinctive trends in their pieces) but again not the director. Action? All identical and the billing goes towards the stars, not the filmmaker. As much as Cinemaphile shitposts about Snyder, say, none of his movies are clearly different enough that a normoid would wonder who directed it.
Among those directors who ARE relatively well known with distinctive styles, they're not popular enough to affect the common culture. >Wes Anderson
Critic's darling but not for the general public. Cashiers and shit dont fricking watch him >Eggers
Come on. Again, the common peasant doesnt appreciate his historic autism
And so forth
Tarantino, he hit this niche that nobody else has. A regular (stupid) person can and does enjoy his bloodsoaked action pieces, but at the same time his work is so stylized that even the greatest dullard notices that it's different from other movies. "Whuh!" Mutters the viewer as the credits roll. "Dat was diffn't dan we normally gets to see." He chews a handful of cud. "Who, uh, who made it dis way?" Tarantino. Tarantino made it. He and he alone has introduced the concept of a "director" to the unwashed masses.
>More popular? Doubt that.
Delusional. Oppenheimer was a 3 hour long biopic about the guy who built the atomic bomb and it made almost a billion dollars.
He's an amazing director and fun enough to be liked by about anybody, and good enough to be regarded by movie fans. He's one of the best of modern times if not the best so it's no wonder everybody that watched a movie once knows of him and namedrops him first
They will have no idea who that is. They have zero knowledge of anything that isn't current thing and will only have the most superficial knowledge of current thing until it's replaced.
For some reason every zoomer knew who Matt Reeves is before the Batman. When I looked him up, his most popular movies were Cloverfield and two Planet of the Apes movies. And every zoomer uninamously thought that this is the guy for Batman, even before Edward was cast as Batman and I have no fricking idea why. Like, ok, I am not arguing these are bad movies, I just wouldn't call him the guy, I didn't even know he made those movies, but everyone was on-board with Matt Reeves Batman train like he was Steven Spielberg. I am not shitting on him, I didn't particularly like the Batman, but he's not the guy, like, how was his name was actually a strong pull.
I've seen the first one with James Franco, it was ok, kind of bored me and didn't watch the rest. But hype around the sequels, it kind of completely went over my head, I didn't even know there were sequels until I looked up what the Matt Reeves hype was about. Cloverfield though, I actually liked it.
The first one is generally regarded as just pretty good but zoomers love 2 & 3, especially 2. They consider it the best film trilogy ever made and think the main ape, Caeser, is one of the best written characters in all of fiction.
Who?
he isnt pc enough for modern zoomers
Bullshit, you can't discuss films anywhere without one of these bumbling morons mentioning him. That goes for music too. Anything with twangy guitar sound you can expect to see a "this could be in Tarantino film!" comment.
>t. hasn't had a conversation in 4 years
the fricking irony
That is not the correct use of the word "irony."
Listen dude, he's just the best one, sorry
what about nolan
Zoomers only know actors from the MCU and rappers.
They know Pac?
He might be the most recognizable, but I bet most zoomers also know Steven Spielberg, Ridley Scott, Martin Scorsese, James Cameron, Wes Anderson, Christopher Nolan and Michael Bay.
moronic millenial homosexual, zoomers are the most literate when it comes to movies compared to previous generations. Probbaly only rivaled by the silent generation
Zoomers are the most moronic generation. I doubt they could even watch a film in it's entirety without looking at their phones or pausing the movie to come back it later. Their attention span is fricked because of the constant stream of dopamine they get from watching tiktok videos
t. Only know about zoomer from internet
Go to your local cinema and watch zoomers appreciate kinos more than the Black personlenials
I go to cinema all the time and only old people are there. Zoomers only care if it's capeshit or another vin diesel tier over the top slop. A live action anime is the top slop on Netflix, I don't need to say more.
I saw KOFTM in cinéma. Most audiences were zoomers.
>t. 22 year old virgin
I've watched 5 Bogdanovich kinos this month
t. 99 zoomer
he makes Cinemaphile seethe like crazy
Never said he is a bad director just that zoomers overrate him
>newbie detected
Cinemaphile fricking loves QT because he's a goddamn footgay. Cinemaphile loves sexual deviants.
His movies are amazing. Just because he makes them unapologetically sexys and rock n roll doesn't mean that's all there is to them
You better take good care of your children, or they will be as misguided as most zoomers you know about.
OK boomer, nobody gives a shit about your old yt men anymore.
The fact is this.
Tarantino is the only director today who is both
>popular / makes films known to the general public
>has a distinctive style
The lay public CANNOT tell you who directed the last several marvel movies, because they're all shot identically. Same with DC, they're stylistically cloned faranchise pieces. But okay, those are slop. Horror movies? Maybe you you can name the studio (Blumhouse, A24 have some distinctive trends in their pieces) but again not the director. Action? All identical and the billing goes towards the stars, not the filmmaker. As much as Cinemaphile shitposts about Snyder, say, none of his movies are clearly different enough that a normoid would wonder who directed it.
Among those directors who ARE relatively well known with distinctive styles, they're not popular enough to affect the common culture.
>Wes Anderson
Critic's darling but not for the general public. Cashiers and shit dont fricking watch him
>Eggers
Come on. Again, the common peasant doesnt appreciate his historic autism
And so forth
Tarantino, he hit this niche that nobody else has. A regular (stupid) person can and does enjoy his bloodsoaked action pieces, but at the same time his work is so stylized that even the greatest dullard notices that it's different from other movies. "Whuh!" Mutters the viewer as the credits roll. "Dat was diffn't dan we normally gets to see." He chews a handful of cud. "Who, uh, who made it dis way?" Tarantino. Tarantino made it. He and he alone has introduced the concept of a "director" to the unwashed masses.
James Gunn and Christopher Nolan are both way better and more popular auteur filmmakers than Memetin Footatintoes.
Better? Sure. More popular? Doubt that. Ask the average joe what Nolan made and he MIGHT say Batman.
>More popular? Doubt that.
Delusional. Oppenheimer was a 3 hour long biopic about the guy who built the atomic bomb and it made almost a billion dollars.
Kek if Barbie didn’t exist it would’ve been lucky to hit half that
He lost his style after Jackie Brown though.
He's an amazing director and fun enough to be liked by about anybody, and good enough to be regarded by movie fans. He's one of the best of modern times if not the best so it's no wonder everybody that watched a movie once knows of him and namedrops him first
They will have no idea who that is. They have zero knowledge of anything that isn't current thing and will only have the most superficial knowledge of current thing until it's replaced.
This. Zoomers don't even remember the Emoji Movie.
They know Nolan
For some reason every zoomer knew who Matt Reeves is before the Batman. When I looked him up, his most popular movies were Cloverfield and two Planet of the Apes movies. And every zoomer uninamously thought that this is the guy for Batman, even before Edward was cast as Batman and I have no fricking idea why. Like, ok, I am not arguing these are bad movies, I just wouldn't call him the guy, I didn't even know he made those movies, but everyone was on-board with Matt Reeves Batman train like he was Steven Spielberg. I am not shitting on him, I didn't particularly like the Batman, but he's not the guy, like, how was his name was actually a strong pull.
zoomers love the new planet of the apes movies, they consider them modern classics.
I've seen the first one with James Franco, it was ok, kind of bored me and didn't watch the rest. But hype around the sequels, it kind of completely went over my head, I didn't even know there were sequels until I looked up what the Matt Reeves hype was about. Cloverfield though, I actually liked it.
The first one is generally regarded as just pretty good but zoomers love 2 & 3, especially 2. They consider it the best film trilogy ever made and think the main ape, Caeser, is one of the best written characters in all of fiction.
How are we defining zoomers? It supposedly starts in 1996 but when people talk about them here it sounds like they're describing 16 year olds.
i go to bat for gilliam. never sat through any of this Black worshipping foot fetishist's slop and don't think i will