You're wrong see I'm the sound mixer and it's your TV set. Tvs aren't programed at the optimal levels and you just have to adjust. It's totally not me.
Needed someone like Donnie Darko in the lead and have it be more obvious that the vampire dude is the kid, but from the future.
The entire movie is fixed and becomes watchable.
As it is the main guy reminds me of an extra that walked onto the set and everyone just mistook him for the lead and rolled with it. Like that one time they ushered in a cab driver into the BBC news segment and he was clueless, but went with it.
The really interesting part is that you could easily remove the main character altogether and suddenly the movie is far more interesting because the agency is shifted onto Debicki who is approached by an agency that wants to stop her husband. Suddenly a lot of stuff about her husband's life make sense to her and she becomes instrumental in taking him down along with Pattinson's help.
The final "twist" is that Pattinson is their son from the future, etc..
I liked it and whenever i hear someone say it was bad like that's the consensus I'm confuted. I guess nolan overextended his creativity beyond what normies can take. Meanwhile a movie where they travel through space with the power of love and there's a bookcase inside a black hole is universally praise for some reason
Conceptually it's incredible, but it's so complicated that it actually doesn't make sense to Nolan himself, therefore it's difficult to even plainly explain to the audience what the rules are. Basically every law of physics is the opposite, for example the car crash and burning fire being cold is just weird to someone going into a time travel movie. This all being said, the plot was fricking shit, Tenet as a word didn't do anything.
Nobody is complaining about the concept.
They're complaining because the main character is horribly miscast and generally written in an uninteresting way.
Compare it to Interstellar, Inception and Prestige who all had FAR more interesting protagonists who were personally involved in the story.
Conceptually it's incredible, but it's so complicated that it actually doesn't make sense to Nolan himself, therefore it's difficult to even plainly explain to the audience what the rules are. Basically every law of physics is the opposite, for example the car crash and burning fire being cold is just weird to someone going into a time travel movie. This all being said, the plot was fricking shit, Tenet as a word didn't do anything.
>This all being said, the plot was fricking shit, Tenet as a word didn't do anything.
The movie is a dream; he dreams of what life is and what life could have been if he could go backwards in time.
I went on a date to the movies to see this with a chick off tinder and I was so engrossed in the plot I didn't make a move on her, we didn't end up seeing each other again
oh well
saw it in theaters and missed at least half the dialogue. worst sound mixing i've ever seen in theaters
It's one of the best movies I've seen that had massive flaws
You're wrong see I'm the sound mixer and it's your TV set. Tvs aren't programed at the optimal levels and you just have to adjust. It's totally not me.
I own the blu ray the sound mixing is still bad had to put on my headphones to finsh the movie without putting on captions
that background music was going off while it was normal action stuff.
actually it was 10 million if you count cripples and non-whites as well as israelites
>then we cut off your balls, stuff them in the cut, block the windpipe
So, you solved TENET, congratulations. But where's the emotional payoff? It's a monotone movie, complex for the sake of complexity nothing else
It was like Inception but actually good.
it's the other way around
If they had a different main actor and a better script MAYBE it would've been as good as Oppenheimer
So maybe it would’ve still been shit but slightly less shit?
But Oppenheimer was way worse than Tenet so you’re saying it would’ve become worse?
It was extra mid.
By being boring, uninteresting and having a charisma black hole as your lead instead of the infinitely more talented Robert Pattinson?
Loved it. Rewatched it a couple of weeks ago. Kinda feel like watching it again.
It had so many subtle cool details in it, like a Kojima game
Needed someone like Donnie Darko in the lead and have it be more obvious that the vampire dude is the kid, but from the future.
The entire movie is fixed and becomes watchable.
As it is the main guy reminds me of an extra that walked onto the set and everyone just mistook him for the lead and rolled with it. Like that one time they ushered in a cab driver into the BBC news segment and he was clueless, but went with it.
I ordered my hot sauce an hour ago
proof that you can just make a movie with a complicated concept but not much else going on and people will pretend to like it to look smart.
The really interesting part is that you could easily remove the main character altogether and suddenly the movie is far more interesting because the agency is shifted onto Debicki who is approached by an agency that wants to stop her husband. Suddenly a lot of stuff about her husband's life make sense to her and she becomes instrumental in taking him down along with Pattinson's help.
The final "twist" is that Pattinson is their son from the future, etc..
You just described memento
Untrue because apart from Memento's gimmick it's also a great way to make you care about what happens to the protagonist.
In fact the entire premise makes you immediately care about the character and his plight as well as the whole concept involved.
Memento has loads going on
nah Memento made sense.
Everything about Tenet falls apart the moment you think about it.
If this had more memeable dialogue i would put it next to the dark knight plane heist.
If you know how Nolan operates you can predict 90% of the end by the half way mark
I liked it and whenever i hear someone say it was bad like that's the consensus I'm confuted. I guess nolan overextended his creativity beyond what normies can take. Meanwhile a movie where they travel through space with the power of love and there's a bookcase inside a black hole is universally praise for some reason
Nobody is complaining about the concept.
They're complaining because the main character is horribly miscast and generally written in an uninteresting way.
Compare it to Interstellar, Inception and Prestige who all had FAR more interesting protagonists who were personally involved in the story.
Conceptually it's incredible, but it's so complicated that it actually doesn't make sense to Nolan himself, therefore it's difficult to even plainly explain to the audience what the rules are. Basically every law of physics is the opposite, for example the car crash and burning fire being cold is just weird to someone going into a time travel movie. This all being said, the plot was fricking shit, Tenet as a word didn't do anything.
>This all being said, the plot was fricking shit, Tenet as a word didn't do anything.
The movie is a dream; he dreams of what life is and what life could have been if he could go backwards in time.
This movie would have been exponentially better without the nog protagonist Nolan, for whatever ((reason)), thought should headline his film.
>millions
You mean gorillions
I went on a date to the movies to see this with a chick off tinder and I was so engrossed in the plot I didn't make a move on her, we didn't end up seeing each other again
oh well
Main character does not have a name, what does it mean?