>the victim was a bright happy person loved by everyone whose family described them as someone who could light up any room they walked into >suspicion soon fell on their ex-spouses, multiple extramarital affairs, business rivals and disowned family members
some company called FilmRise bought the distribution rights to this and tons of other 80s/90s crime shows like Unsolved Mysteries and Beyond Belief and put them on YouTube for free
look at the old 90s episodes of Forensic Files and they straight up feature totally uncensored grisly crime scene photos with zero fricks given
Is Beyond Belief actually fun to watch? I'm always trying to find shows my gf and I could both enjoy and it's a struggle, but the concept sounds fun to me.
Your gf is going to have a special interest in true crime, as most girls do. I'd check out Cold Case Files, which is also free with ads online. All those murders will give her tingly feelings she'll thank you for.
Oh she definitely likes true crime, she always calls me confessing that she watched a bunch of videos about some murder or another and now she's scared and whatnot.
it's totally 90s cheese with the same tone as Ripley's Believe it or Not
it's a decent mix of true and false stories although all of the extremely out there ones labeled "true" are taken from a 1960s pulp book called "Strange Events Beyond Human Understanding" where a dude chronicled all these crazy true stories but he effectively made them all up and there was no one to fact check him back then
[...]
[...]
yeah the old episodes basically showed crime scene photos completely uncensored regardless of gore, and only censored nudity which is honestly absurd
you'll know the bogus "true" stories by the ones that they mention during the ending this bit of voice over >confirmed using first-hand accounts documented by the author Robert Tralins
>although all of the extremely out there ones labeled "true" are taken from a 1960s pulp book called "Strange Events Beyond Human Understanding" where a dude chronicled all these crazy true stories but he effectively made them all up and there was no one to fact check him back then
Those books have been around since at least the 19th century. They're called "tall tales". Paul Bunyan mythos is one. Most people believed they were real.
Of course, no one is disputing that
but the show tried as hard as they could to not mention this, they never said the name of the book and any reference to the author made him sound like an investigative journalist and not a supermarket pulp writer
>Are the new episodes of forensic files kino?
No it was canceled, it's a good thing. The new narrator voice sucks
not cancelled, season 4 premieres literally this coming Sunday
11 months ago
Anonymous
>season 4 premieres literally this coming Sunday
With horrible voice narrator and shit effects
it's totally 90s cheese with the same tone as Ripley's Believe it or Not
it's a decent mix of true and false stories although all of the extremely out there ones labeled "true" are taken from a 1960s pulp book called "Strange Events Beyond Human Understanding" where a dude chronicled all these crazy true stories but he effectively made them all up and there was no one to fact check him back then
some company called FilmRise bought the distribution rights to this and tons of other 80s/90s crime shows like Unsolved Mysteries and Beyond Belief and put them on YouTube for free
look at the old 90s episodes of Forensic Files and they straight up feature totally uncensored grisly crime scene photos with zero fricks given
Pretty kino. Also, the differences between the 90s one versus the new one and recent real crime forensic shows is like night and day. There's some dramatization shots but then you've got a shot that had to have been from the real crime scene like those episodes where a person was shot in the back of the head or burned to death. Not too gratuitous but probably showing more than should be shown. Then you've got recent shows where they blur the real crime photo so much that you can't even tell what body part it is.
yeah the old episodes basically showed crime scene photos completely uncensored regardless of gore, and only censored nudity which is honestly absurd
>although all of the extremely out there ones labeled "true" are taken from a 1960s pulp book called "Strange Events Beyond Human Understanding" where a dude chronicled all these crazy true stories but he effectively made them all up and there was no one to fact check him back then
Those books have been around since at least the 19th century. They're called "tall tales". Paul Bunyan mythos is one. Most people believed they were real.
well duh nobody wants to learn about how some scummy drug addict got stabbed by a hobo in an alley over a dollar
people are sickos and want to hear about a bright innocent college student with her whole life ahead of her getting brutally raped and dismembered
>people are sickos and want to hear about a bright innocent college student with her whole life ahead of her getting brutally raped and dismembered
Like everyone in this thread ?
My point is that they always make sure to say a lot of nice things about the victim even if the victim was a lying cheating scummy piece of shit
I get that your husband or wife sleeping around and divorce raping you isn't an excuse to kill them (lol) but don't pretend like the victim was a blameless saint
>I get that your husband or wife sleeping around and divorce raping you isn't an excuse to kill them (lol)
Isn't it?
The world would be a better place if the degenerate rulling class didn't protect and promote disgusting people
Yeah I would shut it off if they started with >The victim was a gay pedo who buttfricked children as much as he could. A rhythmic slapping noise could be heard coming from his home multiple nights a week.
there was one episode where the killer was taunting the cops involved, and eventually got caught due to forensic evidence another team did
the cops interviewed were smug as frick that he had gotten busted, the vibe being not because they had caught a murderer but because they took down someone that insulted them
it was a fricking obnoxious episode
Pretty kino. Also, the differences between the 90s one versus the new one and recent real crime forensic shows is like night and day. There's some dramatization shots but then you've got a shot that had to have been from the real crime scene like those episodes where a person was shot in the back of the head or burned to death. Not too gratuitous but probably showing more than should be shown. Then you've got recent shows where they blur the real crime photo so much that you can't even tell what body part it is.
I remember a case on one of these shows where some dude was such a penny pinching moron that he returned a chainsaw to the store for a refund after he dismembered a body with it. He didn't thoroughly clean it up and the cops obviously found some blood and tissue on it when they examined it.
Reminds me of this moron who was too lazy to clean the blood and tissue off the hacksaw he used to chop up his victim and the police found it in his apartment lmfao.
Forensic Files is way more complex. Stayvun was just a moron and so were the cops. They just got lucky. Forensic Files is DNA testing plant seed pods to match them with plant material found at the scene while crop dusting a mile radius with luminol
Don't cheap out on your murder implements like Daphne Wright, the fat, black, deaf lesbian who butchered a woman over an imagined relationship with her ex. >A hardware store employee remembered selling a deaf customer a chainsaw. She had handed the worker a note that said “tree cutting machine” and then bought the cheapest model available, a 1.5-horsepower that cost $60.
The last thing you want in a population being pushed into color revolution mode is to have them thinking about murder rationally. Shows like this had to change.
They use a version of the choral synth in the earlier episodes that is really dark and sounding. They seem to know how spoopy it is because they're careful to not over-use it.
>They use a version of the choral synth in the earlier episodes that is really dark and sounding. They seem to know how spoopy it is because they're careful to not over-use it.
I remember that line.
Does anyone ever get an uncomfortable feeling watching this show that some of the forensic evidence people get convicted on is a little questionable?
DNA matches are pretty accurate but imagine getting falsely convicted of murder because you had some grass stuck to your car or something
Most definitely. There are a couple episodes where the cops only have circumstantial evidence and luck into just one forensic piece of evidence that's iffy
absolutely
that and there are multiple episodes where you can tell from the interviews with the cops, that their motivation for wanting to solve the case wasn't to get justice but because they were butthurt at the perp making them look incompetent
The False Imprisonment genre may be the least comfy of any genre. Hearing about the woman that got sent to jail for hit and run while her car was parked downtown when she was out with her bf or husband is like a life-changing level of paranoia. You just never know what shit you could find yourself in through no fault of your own.
I was legit falsely accused of domestic abuse by an ex and spent a weekend in jail over it
I was released without bail by Monday afternoon and I easily proved it false in court a few months later, but it still cost me $6k in lawyers fees and the ex suffered no repercussions
goddamn the weekend in lockup not knowing what's going on or if I'd get out is probably the worst thing I've ever experienced
I had no resources for that at the time, as the accusations made me lose my job and I was using savings to pay bills and pay my lawyer
by the time I was in a position to sue the b***h, she had moved to another state and enough time had passed that I just wanted to put it behind me and bury it
you'll know the bogus "true" stories by the ones that they mention during the ending this bit of voice over >confirmed using first-hand accounts documented by the author Robert Tralins
[...]
Of course, no one is disputing that
but the show tried as hard as they could to not mention this, they never said the name of the book and any reference to the author made him sound like an investigative journalist and not a supermarket pulp writer
[...]
not cancelled, season 4 premieres literally this coming Sunday
did anybody see the episode where the news truck ran over the little girl because the mom let her play without supervision & she ended up in the parking lot as a speedbump? i thought that was BS that the driver was even punished. the mom should not have been awarded any money. it was mostly the mom's fault that it hapened. well anyways, here is a video of the girl wrestling
>There are 3 types of hair:
>Caucasian, Mongoloid, and Black
Makes sense to me. So when do we go back?
>the victim was a bright happy person loved by everyone whose family described them as someone who could light up any room they walked into
>suspicion soon fell on their ex-spouses, multiple extramarital affairs, business rivals and disowned family members
some company called FilmRise bought the distribution rights to this and tons of other 80s/90s crime shows like Unsolved Mysteries and Beyond Belief and put them on YouTube for free
look at the old 90s episodes of Forensic Files and they straight up feature totally uncensored grisly crime scene photos with zero fricks given
Is Beyond Belief actually fun to watch? I'm always trying to find shows my gf and I could both enjoy and it's a struggle, but the concept sounds fun to me.
Your gf is going to have a special interest in true crime, as most girls do. I'd check out Cold Case Files, which is also free with ads online. All those murders will give her tingly feelings she'll thank you for.
Oh she definitely likes true crime, she always calls me confessing that she watched a bunch of videos about some murder or another and now she's scared and whatnot.
Sounds stupid but fun, I'll give it a whirl.
you'll know the bogus "true" stories by the ones that they mention during the ending this bit of voice over
>confirmed using first-hand accounts documented by the author Robert Tralins
Of course, no one is disputing that
but the show tried as hard as they could to not mention this, they never said the name of the book and any reference to the author made him sound like an investigative journalist and not a supermarket pulp writer
not cancelled, season 4 premieres literally this coming Sunday
>season 4 premieres literally this coming Sunday
With horrible voice narrator and shit effects
it's totally 90s cheese with the same tone as Ripley's Believe it or Not
it's a decent mix of true and false stories although all of the extremely out there ones labeled "true" are taken from a 1960s pulp book called "Strange Events Beyond Human Understanding" where a dude chronicled all these crazy true stories but he effectively made them all up and there was no one to fact check him back then
yeah the old episodes basically showed crime scene photos completely uncensored regardless of gore, and only censored nudity which is honestly absurd
>although all of the extremely out there ones labeled "true" are taken from a 1960s pulp book called "Strange Events Beyond Human Understanding" where a dude chronicled all these crazy true stories but he effectively made them all up and there was no one to fact check him back then
Those books have been around since at least the 19th century. They're called "tall tales". Paul Bunyan mythos is one. Most people believed they were real.
well duh nobody wants to learn about how some scummy drug addict got stabbed by a hobo in an alley over a dollar
people are sickos and want to hear about a bright innocent college student with her whole life ahead of her getting brutally raped and dismembered
>people are sickos and want to hear about a bright innocent college student with her whole life ahead of her getting brutally raped and dismembered
Like everyone in this thread ?
of course I wasn't excluding myself or anyone else with "people"
My point is that they always make sure to say a lot of nice things about the victim even if the victim was a lying cheating scummy piece of shit
I get that your husband or wife sleeping around and divorce raping you isn't an excuse to kill them (lol) but don't pretend like the victim was a blameless saint
oh yeah I didn't comprehend that second line well enough mb
>I get that your husband or wife sleeping around and divorce raping you isn't an excuse to kill them (lol)
Isn't it?
The world would be a better place if the degenerate rulling class didn't protect and promote disgusting people
Yeah I would shut it off if they started with
>The victim was a gay pedo who buttfricked children as much as he could. A rhythmic slapping noise could be heard coming from his home multiple nights a week.
there was one episode where the killer was taunting the cops involved, and eventually got caught due to forensic evidence another team did
the cops interviewed were smug as frick that he had gotten busted, the vibe being not because they had caught a murderer but because they took down someone that insulted them
it was a fricking obnoxious episode
i always skip the few stripper episodes there are because who cares if a ho got killed
did u watch the subway fire one yet
Yes sugarbuns
Pretty kino. Also, the differences between the 90s one versus the new one and recent real crime forensic shows is like night and day. There's some dramatization shots but then you've got a shot that had to have been from the real crime scene like those episodes where a person was shot in the back of the head or burned to death. Not too gratuitous but probably showing more than should be shown. Then you've got recent shows where they blur the real crime photo so much that you can't even tell what body part it is.
I remember a case on one of these shows where some dude was such a penny pinching moron that he returned a chainsaw to the store for a refund after he dismembered a body with it. He didn't thoroughly clean it up and the cops obviously found some blood and tissue on it when they examined it.
Reminds me of this moron who was too lazy to clean the blood and tissue off the hacksaw he used to chop up his victim and the police found it in his apartment lmfao.
Forensic Files is way more complex. Stayvun was just a moron and so were the cops. They just got lucky. Forensic Files is DNA testing plant seed pods to match them with plant material found at the scene while crop dusting a mile radius with luminol
Don't cheap out on your murder implements like Daphne Wright, the fat, black, deaf lesbian who butchered a woman over an imagined relationship with her ex.
>A hardware store employee remembered selling a deaf customer a chainsaw. She had handed the worker a note that said “tree cutting machine” and then bought the cheapest model available, a 1.5-horsepower that cost $60.
Are the new episodes of forensic files kino?
Couldn't tell you, I turned it off after the new narrator came on. Peter Thomas was so good that everyone else is unbearable
>Are the new episodes of forensic files kino?
No it was canceled, it's a good thing. The new narrator voice sucks
The last thing you want in a population being pushed into color revolution mode is to have them thinking about murder rationally. Shows like this had to change.
They use a version of the choral synth in the earlier episodes that is really dark and sounding. They seem to know how spoopy it is because they're careful to not over-use it.
>They use a version of the choral synth in the earlier episodes that is really dark and sounding. They seem to know how spoopy it is because they're careful to not over-use it.
I remember that line.
anyone got recs for true crime podcasts that dont insult your intelligence with those cringey VA dramatisation bits? preferably spotify but idc
every one I try has obnoxious V/Os and a melodramatic tone that makes it obvious the target audience is women
Does anyone ever get an uncomfortable feeling watching this show that some of the forensic evidence people get convicted on is a little questionable?
DNA matches are pretty accurate but imagine getting falsely convicted of murder because you had some grass stuck to your car or something
Most definitely. There are a couple episodes where the cops only have circumstantial evidence and luck into just one forensic piece of evidence that's iffy
absolutely
that and there are multiple episodes where you can tell from the interviews with the cops, that their motivation for wanting to solve the case wasn't to get justice but because they were butthurt at the perp making them look incompetent
The False Imprisonment genre may be the least comfy of any genre. Hearing about the woman that got sent to jail for hit and run while her car was parked downtown when she was out with her bf or husband is like a life-changing level of paranoia. You just never know what shit you could find yourself in through no fault of your own.
I was legit falsely accused of domestic abuse by an ex and spent a weekend in jail over it
I was released without bail by Monday afternoon and I easily proved it false in court a few months later, but it still cost me $6k in lawyers fees and the ex suffered no repercussions
goddamn the weekend in lockup not knowing what's going on or if I'd get out is probably the worst thing I've ever experienced
>ex suffered no repercussions
you could have sued the c**t
I had no resources for that at the time, as the accusations made me lose my job and I was using savings to pay bills and pay my lawyer
by the time I was in a position to sue the b***h, she had moved to another state and enough time had passed that I just wanted to put it behind me and bury it
They should start making new episodes.
>They should start making new episodes.
>season 4 premieres literally this coming Sunday
I had no idea about "Forensic Files II". Cool.
No Peter Thomas no watch
Basado
They should just make a deepfake Peter Thomas and pay his kids. They've got enough materials to train a model
Si, jo
a gas chromatograph mass spectrometer
F O R E N S I C O D O N T O L O G Y
killing him INSTANTLY
>the blood splatter pattern on the wall suggesting the type of weapon and the form with which it was wielded
kino
kino episode
did anybody see the episode where the news truck ran over the little girl because the mom let her play without supervision & she ended up in the parking lot as a speedbump? i thought that was BS that the driver was even punished. the mom should not have been awarded any money. it was mostly the mom's fault that it hapened. well anyways, here is a video of the girl wrestling