Saw it in a theater earlier tonight. Thought I had a handle on it the first half hour then the plot started multi-track drifting into incomprehensibility. Felt the closest Breen has done to a horror film.
I loved it
>thinking people can only like outsider art ironically
zoomers should be forcefed tide pods until their stomachs burst
I don't see anything too recent but I don't see a ton to begin with so I'll just start watching what I did find. Thanks
Neil isn't fricking around about these movies, he thinks they're great and have important messages. He's a definitive outsider artist
Well I've seen elm so an episode of two on his work and I think fanboy flicks? I forget but yes I definitely got the impression he was undertaking serious efforts. I'd like to know more of his thinking, what he's on about since lack of experience or incompetence doesn't seem to be the right way to label these efforts
He's a delusional narcissist with a ten year old's grasp of the moral complexity of life who imagines himself as different messianic world saving figures.
9 months ago
Anonymous
Sounds potentially kino when you put it that way
9 months ago
Anonymous
Unironically one of the most important things about creating art is having childlike naivete.
Zoomers were raised with the internet, where everyone and everything can made fun of on the internet, so they invented the cope of not liking anything seriously, taking xanax so that you don’t care about anything.
They’re literally shinji gays that are afraid of standing up for something.
If it felt like something an outsider might want to say i'd agree. But nothing i've seen in any of these films pushes past what I interact with daily. I feel he is holding back, and so what's the point really? If the messages were something truly off-kilter I would see it differently.
I don't consider Breen to be insane. Deranged certainly, but most people are. I don't mean to discredit him by saying he isn't an outsider. I just wish he didn't hold back as much with the metaphors and constant analogies. What makes him stand out isn't just the sincerity of his work but also the bold way he puts forward many of his concepts.
I have no issue with his work being mocked, neither does he. Sarcasm and cynicism are rampant.
The outsider in outsider art doesn't refer to the person being outside of society because they're a loony or hold unconventional beliefs, it just means they're working outside of the traditional system and education of whatever art medium they're in. So for film that just means indie.
If it felt like something an outsider might want to say i'd agree. But nothing i've seen in any of these films pushes past what I interact with daily. I feel he is holding back, and so what's the point really? If the messages were something truly off-kilter I would see it differently.
Insane people tend to believe very strongly in traditional ideas of good and evil, when a drunk bum wants to talk to me it's often about Lucifer or something similar
I don't consider Breen to be insane. Deranged certainly, but most people are. I don't mean to discredit him by saying he isn't an outsider. I just wish he didn't hold back as much with the metaphors and constant analogies. What makes him stand out isn't just the sincerity of his work but also the bold way he puts forward many of his concepts.
I have no issue with his work being mocked, neither does he. Sarcasm and cynicism are rampant.
Double Down is an unironically good surrealist movie tho. I can see people actually liking his first film.
It was also the only one where he used a professional crew who already did several mid to high tier budget movies, hence why Double Down actually looks and is edited like a legit movie.
It's by far his best one and if he had continue with that we would praise Double Down a lot more as an innovative first time movie.
when you get down to it this really isnt any worse than the average mainstream capeshit or pseudo-capeshit action movies now days. take away the hundreds of millions of dollars and thousands of off-short pajeets doing the effects and this is what you get
Im not trying to be contrarian. Thats just my honest opinion. At the end of the day both capeshit and this Neil Breen movie are, in terms of craft, pretty much devoid of any technical artistry. They both overuse green screen to the same extent, resulting in the movies looking unignorably fake, the only difference is that the big studios can pay thousands of third worlders to make the effects, which the director/writer has little to no hand in, whereas Neil Breen does all the effects with his own unskilled hands. At least with Breen his movies are identifiable as the work of a single man. You can see his efforts on display, as misguided as they often are. You can gain an insight into his psychology through observing his work, which Id say is an important element of any art, and his movies are at least unique, and ultimately sincere. On the other hand what do you get with capeshit that costs hundreds of millions of dollars more? The same fake green screen shit but with none of the humanity behind it. It doesnt matter who directs those movies because there is nothing of their person in the final work, they are just insincere products. I would gladly take the Breen movie any day.
So, setting aside cgi effects and money thrown at the movie - you think that the writing, screenplay and overall dialogue reads as something written by a human and not whatever Neil Breen is?
>so bad it's good!
genx should be burt alive
Saw it in a theater earlier tonight. Thought I had a handle on it the first half hour then the plot started multi-track drifting into incomprehensibility. Felt the closest Breen has done to a horror film.
I loved it
>thinking people can only like outsider art ironically
zoomers should be forcefed tide pods until their stomachs burst
If you like this shit unironically…I mean, there’s no way to end that sentence. You’re just too braindead to communicate with.
ice cream yum yum skibidi toilet
le heckin outsidearino!
>outsider art
I never looked at his work in that light. Has he done any legit interviews? I'd like to watch some from this perspective.
search neil breen q&a on YT he did one recently
I don't see anything too recent but I don't see a ton to begin with so I'll just start watching what I did find. Thanks
Well I've seen elm so an episode of two on his work and I think fanboy flicks? I forget but yes I definitely got the impression he was undertaking serious efforts. I'd like to know more of his thinking, what he's on about since lack of experience or incompetence doesn't seem to be the right way to label these efforts
>elm so
*RLM do
He's a delusional narcissist with a ten year old's grasp of the moral complexity of life who imagines himself as different messianic world saving figures.
Sounds potentially kino when you put it that way
Unironically one of the most important things about creating art is having childlike naivete.
Neil isn't fricking around about these movies, he thinks they're great and have important messages. He's a definitive outsider artist
Boomers invented camp. And zoomers so obsessed with irony that now they are afraid of sincerity.
Zoomers were raised with the internet, where everyone and everything can made fun of on the internet, so they invented the cope of not liking anything seriously, taking xanax so that you don’t care about anything.
They’re literally shinji gays that are afraid of standing up for something.
homie it's millennial that are pushing for his following
Also I hate you more than you hate them
Surely he's made enough money to shoot on location at least a couple of times?
100% cgi
The outsider in outsider art doesn't refer to the person being outside of society because they're a loony or hold unconventional beliefs, it just means they're working outside of the traditional system and education of whatever art medium they're in. So for film that just means indie.
is that the anticipated sequel to twisted pair? I can't wait to know what happened to cade altair
go back
NOTHING is more reddit than hating Neil Breen
Nothing is more reddit than ironically watching a bad movie
who said i was doing it ironically
Anime and capeshit are.
I saw fricking New York Times article about Breen today.
A true breenius and a real human breen
give magnet
did he make the poster in MS paint?
Cinemaphile hates this man!
lmfao
Ever get so into making out with a woman that you just toss things off your desk and onto the floor
the dancing was unnecessary
FRICK
>rating: CTC
what does that even mean? looks like the initials of the tittle of the movie instead
check the classification.
>mfw all the zoomzooms infesting this site can't appreciate true schizokino and can't imagine watching outsider art unironically
If it felt like something an outsider might want to say i'd agree. But nothing i've seen in any of these films pushes past what I interact with daily. I feel he is holding back, and so what's the point really? If the messages were something truly off-kilter I would see it differently.
Insane people tend to believe very strongly in traditional ideas of good and evil, when a drunk bum wants to talk to me it's often about Lucifer or something similar
I don't consider Breen to be insane. Deranged certainly, but most people are. I don't mean to discredit him by saying he isn't an outsider. I just wish he didn't hold back as much with the metaphors and constant analogies. What makes him stand out isn't just the sincerity of his work but also the bold way he puts forward many of his concepts.
I have no issue with his work being mocked, neither does he. Sarcasm and cynicism are rampant.
Zoomers fricking love Neil Breen because of "muh hecklin ironic memes". I swear nothing is organic anymore. Everything is a joke to zoom zooms
Double Down is an unironically good surrealist movie tho. I can see people actually liking his first film.
It was also the only one where he used a professional crew who already did several mid to high tier budget movies, hence why Double Down actually looks and is edited like a legit movie.
It's by far his best one and if he had continue with that we would praise Double Down a lot more as an innovative first time movie.
my dad sent me an email the other day unironically talking about how kino (he didnt use this word) neil breen movies are
Thank you Anon. Going to go Saturday to see it.
Should I bring my wife?
>showing a few minutes from my house on September 2
FRICK YES
We live in an age where true kino can still be found, it seems.
>STOP LIKING BAD ART FRICKIN CHUD FRICKIN JERK LMAOOOOO
no.
Is 'identical AI twin' important to the plot?
He's doing twins AGAIN? Why?
It's a sequel
what's better than one Breen? Two Breens.
when you get down to it this really isnt any worse than the average mainstream capeshit or pseudo-capeshit action movies now days. take away the hundreds of millions of dollars and thousands of off-short pajeets doing the effects and this is what you get
Oh come now. You're entering contrarian delusion territory.
That's not any worse than that Wonder Woman clip where she busts out of the ground and runs around in super speed or whatever
Okay, so you're a contrarian. Got it,
Im not trying to be contrarian. Thats just my honest opinion. At the end of the day both capeshit and this Neil Breen movie are, in terms of craft, pretty much devoid of any technical artistry. They both overuse green screen to the same extent, resulting in the movies looking unignorably fake, the only difference is that the big studios can pay thousands of third worlders to make the effects, which the director/writer has little to no hand in, whereas Neil Breen does all the effects with his own unskilled hands. At least with Breen his movies are identifiable as the work of a single man. You can see his efforts on display, as misguided as they often are. You can gain an insight into his psychology through observing his work, which Id say is an important element of any art, and his movies are at least unique, and ultimately sincere. On the other hand what do you get with capeshit that costs hundreds of millions of dollars more? The same fake green screen shit but with none of the humanity behind it. It doesnt matter who directs those movies because there is nothing of their person in the final work, they are just insincere products. I would gladly take the Breen movie any day.
So, setting aside cgi effects and money thrown at the movie - you think that the writing, screenplay and overall dialogue reads as something written by a human and not whatever Neil Breen is?
did they do this with computer trickery or did neil really jump off the double stair set like that?
Damn, they hit the ground so hard it made the ground sink lower and bouncing the car away
Is it possible to learn this power?
not from an insider
why is breen glitching?
i think it's supposed to look like there's multiple breens fighting multiple people
brown guy on the bottom right looks like he knows how to fight
i bet these people paid to be in this movie
I feel sometimes like this site is nothing but people worrying what other people think of them
That's what trolls try to make you do so you feed their insatiable appetite for (you)s.
Never saw his movies and never will. But I'm glad he got to see his vision come to life, as incomplete and amateurish it is.
is it really all CGI backgrounds? if that's the case then i dont really care about i
And if you see Mr. Breen, tell him I said Frick You!