It's funny, if they hadn't added this scene in the "Quantumania" reshoots, they could do a clean break from Kang without any problems.
It's funny, if they hadn't added this scene in the "Quantumania" reshoots, they could do a clean break from Kang without any probl...
They should have made them all different actors.
They can still do that.
>Kang was a big deal in the actual comics
yeah in the 60s
Kang became an annoying Apocaylpse-tier irrelevance around the turn of the century with Kang Dynasty, in which he destroyed all of Washington DC and enslaved the Earth in a very very dull event and then it was over and nobody ever spoke of it again
guy's a monster of the week joke, all that power and how does he use it? like a dumbass
>After recast they dropped all hulk related stuff for 14 years,
uh yeah except for all those movies and tv shows that Ruffalo is in I guess they did
only the most popular MCU movies to date, nothing to see here, nobody watched them because they recast the character and Marvel didn't even make any merch with his likeness because, you know, recast
It doesn't matter at all, does it? MCU has been here before.
>Rhodey recast between Iron Man movies
>Banner recast between Incredible Hulk and Avengers
>Thanos looked completely different in the first two Avengers movies from how he looked in Infinity War and Endgame.
There is no in-universe justification for any of these casting decisions, whatsoever, so there doesn't need to be one for Kang. The audience will catch up.
The difference is absolutely no one on the face of this planet gives the slightest frick about Kang, and this Majors stuff (combined with the Loki season 2 ending) gives them the perfect chance to drop the character and move on. There is NO REASON to move forward with Kang Dynasty at this point.
Kang was a big deal in the actual comics and they already fricked him up. They have a chance to either redo him or drop him and move on... maybe using more F4 villains like Dr.Doom and Galactus.
They're running our of options though because they keep fricking up or killing off characters. Can't keep it up forever.
God damn he's ugly.
Majors did not have the range to play all these variants. I'm kind of glad he's gone.
what's to stop them from removing this scene from the Disney+ release and pretending it never happened?
why do you people pretend anyone gives a shit about kang. the MCU could drop kang as a villain completely and no one would give a frick. he is only "the next thanos" because marvel says he is. he has not been set up as THE bad guy in any movie anyone gives a frick about
>who gives a shit about Kang
I do. I wanna see his crazy sci fi comic book lore adapted to the big screen because I'm a fan of this shit and I was a fan before the twitter zoomies and the film morons watched a youtube video about the character. we are not the same.
>I wanna see his crazy sci fi comic book lore adapted to the big screen
Well you ain't getting it, just like you didn't get comics Thanos on the big screen.
too fricking bad, homosexuals
this isn't the thing that kills the mcu, it's just a thing they've done before
Loki is the actual final scene and that gives them clean slate. Marvel cannot lose.
This was so weird, why'd they make him do chimp noises?
I'm the wokest leftiest marxistest motherfricker around and that is straight up a guy acting like a gibbon in front of a green screen 40 times. I'm not even really sure what they're excited about? Like, they're happy to see each other but the whole content of the Big Three Kang's conversation is that there's a lot of animosity between the variants, so what's so good? If they were all hyped for battle it would make sense if they were armed, or all facing the same direction, or the specific earth they were invading was being shown in some way?
Also, I never saw Quantumania, that Kang straight-up dies? And they just introduce all these people here and now as the big bad? I get they're all functionally the same person but there's absolutely no continuity to this character whatsoever.
>that Kang straight-up dies?
He would have returned as the Beyonder.
a lot of homosexuals doomposting the end of kang plots sure don't read comics.
it's like I'm in twitter.
It's not about comics, duh. After recast they dropped all hulk related stuff for 14 years, war machine role was also significantly cut compare to first IM movie. Same thing will happen to Kang,
so you also don't know shit about how movies are made either or why the hulk was absent for those 14 years. I'm glad to have this constant reassurance that everybody who says they know better than me is an idiot.
>they don't know about universal
>all those movies
Literally wish fulfillment. Recastkeks are hilarious, After recast Hulk become less of a character that Black Widow
>we need jokes in avengers hulk smash
>we need drama in aou hulk smash
>we need cameo in thor hulk smash
>we need a reason why avengers lose that because hulk didn't want to smash
>we need a way to bring back Thanos for last fight hulk smah
They basically turn him into some kind of plot device that must smash on command.
>war machine role was also significantly cut compare to first IM movie
The frick are you talking about? Rhodey was arguably an even bigger part of Iron Man 2 and 3, since he actually got to take part in the action in those. Hell he's got his own TV show in development now.
This is what passes for release-ready VFX in the flagship franchise of the world's biggest media conglomerate these days?
I mean they teased Baron Mordo going evil and all that end up was an offscreen mention.
But anon! THE BILL COMES DUE!!!!
Fricking insane how they do that.
He was such a pathetic character.
First time we see Thanos actually engaging with an enemy, he breaks the hulk. He lays out his motives clear as day, he menaces and shows his power.
First time we see Kang, he's a giggly, mundane literally-who at the end of the universe. Some Karen stabs and kills him.
Second time we see him, he says he's a big deal, and some old lady foils his shit and leaves him in a fricking quantum puddle for decades.
THIRD time, he's twatted by Antman and a malfunctioning human toe.
Every time he's seen, he's fricked over and beaten.
What kind of cinematic excellence could we expect from watching TEN THOUSAND copies of Captain Domestic getting easily thrashed by ironheart? Fricking Ironheart!
It wouldn't be the first pointless plot thread they set up and abandoned without a second thought. THIS is of absolutely no consequence.
>Avengers 5
>opening scene
>picks up right off that scene
>all the Kangz are hooting and hollering
>the entire stadium blows up
>Beyonder/Doom/Dormammu/whoever, reveals himself to the camera
>TITLE SCREEN
Damn, so hard to do...
Nah, bro. Let's make it Maliketh the Dark Elf from Thor 2.
How is he alive?
The dark side of the force is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnatural.
Nah man, bring in the Sphinx, played by Cavill.
Don't do that to him.
The man's suffered enough.
Alright then, let's give him something juicy.
>The Breaker Of Bucks
>The Whipper Of Zesties
>The Beyonder
Could you dial your homosexualry down several notches?
Something below "drag queen" would be nice.
Stop being so zesty then, BlacKang-kun.
He's no gayer than 95% of Hollywood actors. Seems like the guys who choose Drama Club over Sports or Debate team are reliably homo.
Cavill, Cruise, Diesel, Teh Rock...
"Oh but some of them have kids and a beard"
So did Michael Jackson.
Frick, i bet you LOVED "Eternals".
>cast the most ogre-ish niiggerist Black person they could find for max ESG score
>Shock and surprise the apeish nig turned out to be a full ape big
Kek
>We can sell multiple Kang toys to children and collectorcels, it'll be brilliant! Start production.