It's kino.
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
It's kino.
It's kino.
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
ah, so is this the next random movie that you're gonna samegay into oblivion to make everyone hate because you're an autistic moron?
>being this invested into an image board
holy frick, kys, subhuman
>talking about a movie on a movie forum is bad
you know it, homie!
It was trash, just like the menu.
lame ending but the fact it shits on food snobs makes it kino
BULLSHIT. This was so well executed, super original premise while also honoring horror tropes, fantastic art direction, perfectly paced, and broke new faces with real talent. An absolute triumph.
>super original premise
anon you're underage.
When was The Menu's premise done before, you slack-jawed election tourist?
>what if THE JOKER worked at a fancy restaurant?
I too enjoyed this movie. Btw my IQ is 65 and I have only seen 3 movies
>honoring horror tropes
homie go outside
If outside's so great, then go there and stay the frick off this board
The Menu was kino too
Its nothing like the menu at all.
is delroy going to jail?
AWAKEN SLEEPER
No way, he put down a demon that clearly killed at least three people on camera in gruesome ways
He might have a few questions to answer about the woods.
I liked it, the Argentinian version from 2020 is comfy as well
i was saying it would make a great double feature
the more i watched i think the history of occult guys can fukken sue late night with
Is Ricardo Darin in it?
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11310884/fullcredits
why are the Devil's deals always so shitty? people really need to take away that guy's business license.
>why are the Devil's deals always so shitty? people really need to take away that guy's business license
you know, that devil guy is a real jerk!
I didn't get the ending because I was trying not to fall asleep and might have missed some things. He ended up killing everyone under hypnosis?
the demon killed everyone while possessing the girl exactly as depicted. then he stabbed the girl while trapped in a euthanisia vision of his wife. it wasn't trying to do any extra twists, it directly showed you what happened.
this post is going age badly when the sequel shows the footage and delray killed everyone on camera
...
The voiceover in the beginning tell you flat out this is the raw unedited footage.
Who filmed his hallucinations at the end?
if they make a sequel I'll happily take the hit to my self-esteem to get another movie.
Late night with the devil 2: The E! True Hollywood story
but how would he burn the one guy or snap gusss' neck?
don't forget we as an audience were also under hypnosis
And don't forget that audiences in this case includes us, the viewers.
yeah, that's what i meant actually. Such a stupid idea, especially for a found footage movie
The movie isn't "found footage" as in being shackled to strict, unadventurous expectations-- it wanted to be more than that and accomplished it.
Also it was an ingenious trick. Are you perhaps against it because you fell for it?
>Are you perhaps against it because you fell for it?
those are the people i share this board with
So you are mad bc you fell for it but you can't directly admit to it.
yes, i really believed i was hypnotized by randi and then by demon abraxas
It's not about "believing"-- it's about the way the script uses the hypnotism session as a Chekhov gun that later makes the delirious final sequence narratively feasible. It explains why we see what we see outside the confines of the ff format.
>It's not about "believing"
with that genre it is. That's the whole point of it
If you flow along the narrative, you've accepted its premises, but "believing" itself seems a naive expectation/attitude.
you're a fricking moron. The whole point of found footage genre is to play pretend it's real footage. Of course you know it isn't because ghosts, demons, witches or aliens aren't real but you play pretend and then the movie works. Why are you even making FF movie and then pull shit like that?
No, you're a low IQ type sperging out bc muh found footage rules weren't mechanically adhered to and it triggers your autizmo. It's a fricking movie.
It clearly, deliberately stepped out of the documentary representation into a delirious/hypnotic state. At the very last scene it goes back to the ff format as the presenter repeats the words to break the trance.
But if you feel triggered bc you really did expect 90 mins of demonic possession you're just an imbecile who hasn't learned how to watch and approach movies and fiction in general.
>It's a fricking movie.
this. It doesn't have to make sense. They could have barrack obama flying dragons in the finale. It's a movie, grow up
why do you make a ff movie if you don't want to make a ff movie? This is the problem with almost all the bad ff movies. Director chooses the format when he clearly wants to just make a normal movie
Because ff is but one narrative tool among many the directors/writers may choose to use at their discretion.
They're not beholden to the international ff council or to the expectations of narrowminded types who expect predictability in the way movies, tropes and genres are presented.
you're clearly a moron
Again, your autism has been triggered by the fact that the movie didn't flow mechanically/predictably like a toy train but that's on you, dummy.
>Found footage movie doesn't have to look like found footage. You can just throw some hypnosis hallucinations in it and imply viewer is imagining them and they are not part of the actual footage
literally listen to yourself you stupid fricking chud of a moron
>Found footage movie
It's a movie that uses the format, movies are about being creative and your meltdown at this point seems literally pathetic.
You are clearly being autistic. I’d say just walk away but I know you are a slave to the compulsion.
I liked it. Great take on the found footage/fake-documentary style movie.
>dude 70s TV lmao
>dude the satanic panic lmao
It's kinda meh. Its whole premise is nostalgia pandering.
people aren't nostalgic for shitty 70s TV or the satanic panic you idiot, that's not what nostalgia is.
you underestimate the power of nostalgia
THIS
no should make a movie that doesn't take place in the present ever again, i'm so tired of nostalgia pandering
It is a little bit but the premise is interesting in its own right. It's filmed in a cool creative way too. It's probably a 7 or 8/10 film which is refreshing in an age where <5/10 films are the norm.
Another soft-disclosure astroturfed flick. They are ramping it up. Something will happen soon.
I also got this vibe with the satanic woods meetings.
>Indian/Poojeet/Black acceptance
>Gay acceptance
>Transgender acceptance
>Pedophile acceptance
Next stage is admitting demons exist and we have to respect them
Movie feels like it cost 30 dollars to make.
>The fake old camera look was horrible just use an actually old camera instead of a fricking filter
>Special effects with the electricity were fricking laughable like babys first after effects project.
The obvious ai art was the cherry on top. Couldn't hire a person on fiver to draw a fricking skeleton pathetic.
The limited budget def hurt it but since this movie is successful we could get a higher budget one.
>The limited budget def hurt it
aw gee anon, I guess it's hard to compete with the incredible visuals of a Denis Villeneuve movie.
Who hurt you?
primarily the relative cultural exposure good movies get in comparison to far more widely-marketed bad movies.
There are no good movies since 2007. Get over yourself. This movie is completely better than these big budget shit films like rebel moon.
>The obvious ai art was the cherry on top.
I thought the AI Art was just the "we'll back back" title cards!?
yeah totally it should have taken place around a zoomer youtuber channel instead of the 70s
that would have definitely turned it into a cult classic
https://variety.com/lists/late-night-with-the-devil-70s-set-low-budget/
>Despite the tactile elements on the set, the team still needed plenty of onscreen magic to make the story come to life. Adam White, one of the film’s producers who also oversaw visual effects, says that with a $150,000 VFX budget, the team did nearly 300 visual effects, leaving only about $500 per effect. That limited budget inspired some serious creativity from the crew.
should've just gotten the old merv griffin set from kramer
Just finished it. Crap.
Nothing happens for the most part.
>nothing happens
Just life your life anon
Sorry I don’t like your shitty new favourite film moron.
its borderline sci-fi at the end though
yeah it basically turns into Solaris at one point.
its utter garbage
I love it simply because it makes artgays seethe
I agree I hope ai rapes these artistic homosexuals
SEXO
>me everytime i visit a hooker who looks nice on photos but tells me to cum fast.
I hate how this mentality is so pervasive now. People will buy mediocre/inferior products, movies, games, music, etc., just because the company pisses off some group of people.
It's only a bit less moronic than those people who go and buy products from a shit company so they can destroy them for Facebook views.
Which parts were AI? I didn't notice.
I think it was the interstitials when the show cut to a commercial.
I googled it and you're right, apparently they used AI to create 3 still images (the interstitials) which were then further edited by a graphics team.
kek so its just art homosexuals being homosexuals about it
I wonder where they draw the line? Do they get shitty at video games that use procedural generation? Do they hate photoshop? Digital art? Pen and paper? Coal smudged against a stone wall?
>I wonder where they draw the line?
what matters is that a computer doesn't draw it for them
AIslop.
>Late night with the devil
>It's not even the devil
>just a random demon who serves another demon
The devil is humans lust for fame
the devil is clearly ai generated imagery
a very risky and meta move but i say it paid off
Imo the devil is personified in the movie as attentionwhoring/unbridled fameseeking. That's why the possessed girl stares at the camera all the time and seems so interested in being filmed, the demon's mocking human excessive search for fame, ratings etc
the camera staring was the spookiest part
overall low on spooks but still fun
it's pinoy
why didn't the devil wait for the show to beat Carson and then kill everyone
It's implied he did. In the backstage sequences the producers tells the presenter about the record ratings the live show was getting. Which is why the presenter becomes bolder and complies with the live audience's request to have a demonstration of Lilly's possession-- which in turn makes the debunker guy do a hypnotism session that the demon promptly uses to fool the presenter and make him stab the girl.
Didn't the devil already have a deal with johnny?
>Sell your soul to Satan in a satanic murder-suicide ritual in order to gain Hollywood fame and wealth.
>Somehow the best that Satan can do is give you a fricking 1970s public broadcast garbage variety hour show with a no budget that isn't even in a primetime TV slot.
Wow, totally worth it.
Yeah, this is definitely the latest movie to get a shill campaign.
you are so fricking predictable LMAO
>it's predictable that you'll be accused of shilling when you're engaged in a chilling campaign
...yes.
torrent dropped. Whenever you see a movie suddenly being talked about a lot, it always means that the torrent just dropped, you stupid chud
kek
just wait till Civil War for example drops on torrents.
>stop shilling this movie
>why is it shilled so hard past few days?
>what are they trying to cover up with this?
The types who yell "shilling" are objectively idiots bc there's not that many ppl on Cinemaphile to warrant that and the discussions as mentioned above correlate with the movie hitting the torrent trackers.
erm where are my wojaks and sneeds? why are people posting about new movies???
This movie is literally nothing special. Not sure why you children seem to like it so much. Must be all the pot you're smoking.
>This movie is literally nothing special
It has a fun charismatic lead and merely aims to entertain without thinly veiled intersectional feminist preaching, sadly that is a whole lot in current year clown world.
Very imperfect but I like these lost media / analog horror movies, hope they make more but with more focus on the found footage aspect
why didn't the power of christ compell a minor demon?
i felt like they spent too much time with the intro build up. they could have cut that in half. throw in some interviews of people who watched it live the first time and or audience members. have them claim to have seen different things
There was no need for the exposition at the start when we learn all that information organically during the film. In fact it hurts the movie for me cause we spend most of it retreading what we learned in the opening ten minutes. What the frick were they thinking? The little girl doesn't even appear until nearly an hour in. It's shit.
>There was no need for the exposition at the start when we learn all that information organically during the film.
It was part of the movie's aesthetic aspects, it wanted to give flavor and visual impact to the narrative.
>the one atheist character immediately apostatizes and starts worshipping satan
what did they mean by this?
now that's what i call speedwatching
>without the idiotic intro and 27 company cards, the movie would be about 50 minutes long
Thank you anon, now I can shitpost about this film without someone telling me I never watched it.
What I notice in this webm that I didn't notice in the movie is that apparently a LOT of shots started back a few paces, then zoomed in
Srs what's up with the 8000 logos in the beginning of this slop!?
Low budget movies usually need funding from lots of people, and people who fund movies typically want their logo plastered on it somewhere.
Source?
>Concept is found footage of an old 1970's TV recording
>Contains scenes set during that era that are shot like a regular movie
Did they just forget what movie they were trying to make?
Did they ever say it was just found footage? There is that intro as well
Maybe could've had a photographer taking backstage pictures, and then used them with narration and (surviving) eyewitness testimonies during the adbreaks. Would've kept more with the documentary style from the start.
Maybe show still pictures of the people from a backstage photographer then play the recorded audio since the host was still mic’d up.
That sort of thing, sure.
I'm imagining something like this image, while the narrator is going:
>It is at this point Jack is informed by Leo of Christou's death.
>The decision is made not to tell Gus.
and then cutting in the details of his death.
It is not kino, slophomosexual. It is corny uncreative dogshit made by two obese b-movie horror directors. If the whole fricking was AI images it would have been better. Die.
If anyone rate this movie above a 5/10, they are morons for sure
what were the alleged ai scenes?
not even scenes. Like three stills
The ad break title cards, they could have drawn them just like carson
When he walks on stage on the new show right in the center of the audience is devil horns, the skeleton was apparently seen out in the forest.
>When he walks on stage on the new show right in the center of the audience is devil horns, the skeleton was apparently seen out in the forest.
care to take a screenshot? or give a timestamp?
?
the cards between the shows, they gave them an ai facelift, it's like 3 cards or something kek
David Dastmalchian (Jack) gave an interview to Variety and was asked directly about the possibility of the devil being in the audience/in the movie.
"Okay, I’m going to come out and ask it. The people in the audience in costume — particularly the mute skeleton — is that the devil?"
"The skeleton to me, in the end, is someone whose come from the coven to make sure and collect. The devil, in my opinion, really only makes one quick appearance in the film. And it’s quite subtle. I’m genuinely enjoying seeing on social media that people who have now been into their second or third view of the film and they’re going, “Ah, I see when we got a quick appearance!” Because as June says, she believes that Mr. Wriggles may not be the Satan itself or Abraxas itself, but a minor deity that is serving towards the greater cause, if you will."
So what was the devil Cinemaphile? He claims it shows up only briefly
>So what was the devil Cinemaphile? He claims it shows up only briefly
The dying wife impersonation who asks him to stab "her"
Not necessarily. I think a major theme of the movie is the perils towards associating oneself with occult practices. Even without outright making a pact/selling one's soul, inviting this type of element into one's life brings along evil effects.
Since his ratings keep falling (except when he paraded his dying wife), it's reasonable to assume evil was enticing him to return to it by exploiting it on his show.
I thought that was his wife possessing him to get him to kill the girl
His real wife had been dead for a long time and he was under hypnosis. The demon used her image as the ultimate trick to fool him into committing murder.
I still find this take weird because when he wakes up at end his friends were killed same way by the demon.
The initial killings were the demon's doing, then the presenter goes into a trance, kills the girl and snaps back to reality.
Its first guy he asks questions to in the crowd
I like how none of you wanna talk about the channel logo. And jack saying he was just ribbing him is another biblical callback right
what about the logo is it you would like us to discuss?
And who was the fricking devil? He made two deals and one involved his new boss
The girl name is LILLITH DIABLO
Lily D'abo
>diablo
They really weren't fricking around
oscar when?
This felt like a V/H/S segment that was stretched way too far into a full length movie. Opening voiceover goes on forever and was completely unnecessary, cgi was dogshit, ambiguous ending with no real explanation or development.
Its bad times for movies when something this mediocre gets hype
For me I hated the first guest but enjoyed the opening doco narration
i liked everyone, I think the debunker was the best. He makes the movie
That's bane from matrix 3
>Opening voiceover goes on forever and was completely unnecessary
this. It was so painful. Just start the movie already, come on
Ai is gonna take over horror isn't it. Finally something new in a rotting genre
>It really was Madeline communicating with Christou. She used the name Minnie because she knew Jack would just assume it’s Christou’s cheap bullshit if he said Madeline. By using her private nickname, she hoped Jack would listen.
>Abraxas killed Christou to ensure Madeline is not able to communicate with Jack.
>With no medium like Christou, Madeline is helpless to just stand there next to Jack, unable to tell him that the version of her he will see at the end of the movie is an illusion that will trick him into unleashing Abraxas into the minds of all the viewers.
Madeline is the most tragic figure in the movie.
yeah I think the big one is when you see static and demon approaching you
Did you copy this from a Youtube comment I just saw like five minutes ago or are you the Youtube commenter lol
Ghostwatch remains superior in this subgenre of another subgenre of horror
they should have written a fake book by the doctor and released it at the same time
It was basically a long Twilight Zone episode.
Where the FRICK is Mike and Jay's video to give me this opinion officially?
Seems like you have this impression found footage has to be normal all the time? There is supernatural FF and stuff to weird to let the public view FF. All of these can exist together. Like banned footage FF. Its why the footage comes from a time before the internet so it explains why it was banned so well.
>The whole point of found footage genre is to play pretend it's real footage. Of course you know it isn't because ghosts, demons, witches or aliens aren't real but you play pretend and then the movie works
that's what i said before. You can have supernatural things, of course. But you can't have shit like that. It doesn't make sense, no matter how you look at it
>It's a movie that uses the format
lol. Sinister is a movie that uses the format and uses it well
>Sinister is a movie that uses the format
Which only reinforces the otherwise obvious fact that directors and creators in general are free to tell stories they way they prefer, not the way you expect.
you clearly haven't seen Sinister. You have no idea what you're talking about. Found footage scenes in Sinister were done flawlessly and they adhered to that one basic rule that is literally in the name of the genre
I did watch Sinister and your comparison was obviously an attempt to criticize LTWTD. But nobody cares about your opinion, this is what you're missing. Directors will keep using ff as they see fit, not according to what you consider good or narratively acceptable.
it's not what i consider good or acceptable. Its the whole point of the genre
>actually, that wasn't part of the footage. You, the viewer, have imagined those worms
how can you not see how dumb and immersion breaking that is?
>Its the whole point of the genre
Genres have no "point". They coalesce around certain tropes and techniques but neither are mandatory. In fact, stepping outside them is what makes movies fresh rather than stale fast-food fodder for lowest common denominators.
The artist goes further so as to make things more interesting, as Orson Welles did when he filmed Lady from Shanghai using mostly daylight scenes.
>how can you not see how dumb and immersion breaking that is?
Because the only thing dumb about it is you and your midwit expectation that it'd follow another route that doesn't trigger you.
Immersion isn't a huge effort for ppl of average intelligence and above since it should be easy to flow with the movie while being unattached to an insecure yearning for predictability.
>Genres have no "point". They coalesce around certain tropes and techniques but neither are mandatory.
>found footage isn't mandatory in found footage
>predictability
why are you throwing that word around? I made clear what my problem with this movie is
(me)
ps. you know what i meant when i said this
>found footage isn't mandatory in found footage
You're mistakenly assuming that ff is a fixed label like "Big Mac". It's just a narrative resource among many
>yes i'm vegan. yes i eat meat. we exist
it reminds me of this lol
>Genres have no "point".
This one has
No it doesn't. FF movies that go outside the confines of the format or use it partially or in novel ways abound and this is good because it challenges rather than anesthetize the viewers.
LTWTD is a huge success for several reasons and being a formulaic ff fortunately isn't one of them.
>Devil is useless he can't kill lilly
He wanted to cause the downfall of the presenter in the most ironic/cruel way possible. The demonic approach is to entice and then deceive.
>that one picture with crowley
It was decent yeah. The hypnotist with the side host was v good.
I think conceptually the idea of mixing a late night talk show with horror and a little hit of exrocist is a very interesting idea, I liked the movie but I think that idea could be executed to a much better level.
what the frick was up with the commercial break segments? it went from being found footage style to suddenly being the office? the camera keeps moving around and the way its set up feels like its meant to have that fly on the wall type of set up, really fricked up the immersion
those segments could've been dropped entirely or at least have the characters being focused on go off to the side of the stage or something and the camera zooms in, but instead it just switches to this new black and white camera
The movie's a documentary about the last night of the Night Owl live tv show. After the introduction, it shows the tapes from that night (until we get into the mass hypnosis segment at the end)..
My one objection was alternating between full and widescreen, should have been fullscreen up until the final sequence which wasn't filmed so to speak.
so the implication there is that someone was filming behind the scenes segments? for a failing shows last desperate grasp at relevance? also there's blatantly two different camera angles during those segments so there were two camera men running around filming peoples private conversations for posterity?
i liked it overall, but that's a problem
>so the implication there is that someone was filming behind the scenes segments?
>also there's blatantly two different camera angles during those segments so there were two camera men running around filming peoples private conversations for posterity?
Yes. If you must assume a literal stance about what happens, it's a fly on the wall documentary about that specific make or break night of the show.
i guess that works, it still bugs me but i'm not gonna complain too much about one of the years only decent non franchise/sequel/reboot/remake horror pictures
I was under the impression we’re hearing all the private stuff through the pov of the evil girl. Because she’s constantly shown eavesdropping and reacting, but I guess that doesn’t make sense prior to her showing up at the studio
It's not bad but I didn't really like it, it just doesn't commit enough with anything to be truly engaging. It doesn't start as a found footage, so the immersion is already damaged. Everything goes too fast because the movie doesn't want to have the boring realistic parts of a talk show, so you're never convinced you're really watching actual footage, and the behind the scenes is too good quality to actually feel like it too. The climax also feels really misplaced. I think it's trying to emulate old movies with dated special effects, but since the story is building up to a supposed real event, going all marvel powers in the end destroy the little of immersion that was left. And finally, the movie also doesn't end as a found footage, jumping out of it to continue the story. It's not bad, but I think it could be executed better or be more focused, for me it's a 5/10.
False
...really?
This was legit the only part I disliked from it. It looked so bad and slapped together, I honestly couldn't believe it. Other than that, one of my favorites so far this year.
It was whatever safe paranormal slop for Christian moms to watch.
*audience audibly awws*
There's a vaguely M3gan-ish eeriness/artificiality about her from the get-go
That's because it was never Lilly, it was always the demon controlling her. The only time we see the actual Lilly is when she's screaming in anguish as her head splits open.
Yes, I agree, and her obsession about the camera lens was the demon mocking humans who are too focused on public attention/ratings at any price.
American Dad did the concept a lot better and with less time
Surprised it took this long to mention this movie is a soulless ripoff of Nighthawks
It's bad. Failed to capture the soul of carson-era late night which is the foundation of the entire movie.
It's not based on Carson but a popular American late night presenter who had a show in Australia that featured lots of supernatural-related guests and if what you want/expected is a reenactment of Johhny Carson's shows the movie's not for you.
>indefinite article
Sure, sure.
t. not even that anon, actually watched the movie so I know Delroy's not not-Carson
Here's what the directors were going for:
>we had our own late-night talk show host called Don Lane who was American. And a lot of incidents on that show did inform the writing of Late Night With The Devil. Don Lane was seriously curious about the supernatural. Any chance he would get he would invite psychics and magicians and, you know, spoon benders, those sorts of characters. He had the great ghost hunters the Warrens on two nights in a row investigating local hauntings in Melbourne. All this on what’s supposed to be a glitzy variety show.
>carson-era late night
tried watching this tonight, didn't even get halfway through
kept waiting for it to pick up, pretty garbage.
What
The actor who played the James Randi type character was hamming it up so bad it was annoying.
kino? nah. its pastiche. it is what it is: ok.
. it was like an ai generated compilation of "defining moments in americana occultism , of the 70s-80s : uri geller vs james randi, anton lavey-esque look of one dude, the exorcist as a literary and cinema phenomenon, shout out to amityville, but with a sprinkle of 90s with a david koresh-esque event and a shout out to paranoid conspiracy theorist of the early 00s with the inclusion of the bohemian grove . Add a night of the demons/prince of darkness visual inspiration and electricity/ recorded media shenanigan. "the omen" / "rosemary's baby" type of child creation effort and that covers it pretty much. allusion to faust too. which is nice, retro stuf; it is what it is. a bit goofy.
what other horror movies references are in there that i missed. that movie was so trapped , in a way, and its almost as if they were cognizant of it when they were breaking the 4th wall saying TURN OFF THE TV! they are trapped in their nostalgia psychosis and this is not the answer, turning off the tv would be better than continue to support that kind iof zombie cinema
It seems to have been visually inspired by comic artists such as Dan Clowes, Charles Burns and Johhny Ryan as well
So in end did he sacrifice his wife for fame?
It seemed more like he made a pact for fame and didn't know what the sacrifice would be or that he would have to sacrifice something so important to him.
It's pretty clear that he didn't expect the price for the pact to be his wife, hell, he probably didn't even believe all that cult shit was real and he just agreed to get in contact with the inner circle of the business. After the wife death he probably lived in denial about it being caused by him
The film doesn't answer much but I thought her death gave him a month off then the deal happens
It’s decent, at least somewhat original in its concept, but it failed pretty hard in some places. Some of the cgi was god awful, the first host was just a waste of time, and it just wasn’t scary.
i wouldnt go so far as to say he intentionally sacrificed his wife for fame but he definitely made a sacrifice for ratings
it was great but i have a soft spot for practical effects, did anyone else notice the wife multiple times throughout the film? usually in mirrors
I kinda wish we had one more kooky guest on before the devil girl though
Maybe if you're a dumbass, yeah.
I was hoping the skeptic guy was going to be the devil convincing everyone that he didn't exist while also hypnotizing as big an audience as possible to go start doing satanic shit
this
i came here to post basically this
that would be an interesting plot twist
found hte devil
that's his wife
I rather enjoyed it, I just wish there was more subtle/background weird and spooky shit that ramped up through the movie, that you wouldn't immediately notice unless you were looking for it or on subsequent viewings.
the ending was kinda meh
the actors were good though, the debunker was great
It was a refreshing change to the typical horror slop hollywood pedals year in, year out, I'd give it a good 8/10 as far as horror movies go, could have been a little longer, I feel like they could have stretched out the movie a little bit further to explore the dynamics between the characters more, like the cult and the MC.
Yeah, it left me wanting more, which is always a good sign. It felt a lot shorter than an hour and a half
it sure is. at the same time it is best to leave the audience to speculate. the imagination will conjure up something interesting.
could have been 45m without the ridiculously long intro
I enjoyed this movie more since I recently watched the american masters documentary on Johnny Carson a few months ago. 95% of Cinemaphile is 13-29 yrs old so late night talk shows doesn't mean much.
Honestly really liked it. The ending was a bit all over the place but the build up was really great. I'd give it a B+
I wouldn't say kino, but it was an interesting film that did something new, and I appreciate that.
waste of time, lily was hawt thou
same with civil war, jessie was hawt
It sucked, Reddit teir garbage