It advanced a lot in the first 6 months, when everyone who worked on AI realized they had to publish their models now to ride on the AI hype wave, and then people combined those models privately. Since then there has been no advancements (with visual art)
You people keep insulting AI for it's looks as if that matters, its petty nonsense. Real art has lumpy or ugly looking moments too, and AI will only get better. The issue isn't looks, thats a psyop by AIgays so that they can strike back against it when the technology improves. There's plenty of real reasons not to like artificial, souless fast-food NPC slop, that aren't "durr it look bad".
This shit is made for machines who don't want art, they want product. And NPC will never improve or change their mind, that's why we call them NPCs. Ignore em, make better art, frick AI, frick OP, frick Albania, and frick (you).
Yeah AI is a tool to aid art, its not the second coming of christ as AIgays endlessly screech
Why is Albania catching strays
Is that even a question that deserves to be asked anon?
it does,I hate to admit it but it does. No that hard considering most of the present day artists don't give a frick about making stuff with beautiful and captivating designs
Go watch fricking netflixvania if you want "beautiful and captivating designs" that looks like this
>Go watch fricking netflixvania if you want "beautiful and captivating designs" that looks like this
I wouldn't be surprised if the new show used AI, the last shot of Richter didn't look like a person made it
Trying to AI every frame is a mistake. They should try to AI some 3d models, and then AI their movement scripts. Then you have something you can edit and nudge to fix the bugs.
it does,I hate to admit it but it does. No that hard considering most of the present day artists don't give a frick about making stuff with beautiful and captivating designs
Isn't it depressing that we used to think machines would do all the manual labor while people could fully dedicate themselves to artistic and intellectual pursuits, yet in reality it's the other way around?
Turns out it's more cost effective to replace a poet or a programmer or a lawyer than replacing a miner or a tomato picker.
There will always be a job for humans down in the mines gathering sulphur and cobalt and getting lung cancer when you're 35
Because they are uncreative normies and don't think art is valuable enough to dedicate themselves to it, most are just on AI either for money, fame or trends.
It's less hatred of art and more hatred of artists which is absolutely garbage because the only thing separating them from that group is the lack of experience and/or effort.
the technology to make machines do manual labor is already something that can be implemented it's just not done because jobs can control the people, but art is pointless so replacing artists is totally fine because that just means more people can work at the onions factory doing labor all day
India still lives under a rigorous caste system because they made the English frick off before the process of destroying it was complete. Because of this, low caste people are locked into a fugue state: they live the lives of second class citizens, but have received enough westernized education to dream of social mobility, especially if they leave the country.
Many companies with international hiring programs have big personnel bases in the United States, and the US has an extremely lenient form of visa called the H1-B. If you have technical skills and a job offer, you can apply for an H1-B, and then the US holds a lottery to determine which applicants can move on over. The odds of getting drawn for a predetermined number of visas are, naturally, based on how many people apply, but it can be anywhere from a 5% to a 30% chance of success (and if you fail, you just try again next year). Plus, once you win, you get 6 years in America before you have to go through the lottery again, during which you can hopefully find a citizen to marry and make your escape permanent.
The key to the H1-B is, again, the combination of technical skills and a job offer. If you're a world-class talent, the job offer comes easy, and you actually get better odds in the lottery because a subset of the visas are set aside for advanced degrees. If you're not a world class talent, an easy way to hedge your bet is to pivot and specialize in emerging tech, because there's often more job postings and less experts for these positions. The Indian guys acting like they'd give their life to defend a large language model are essentially peawieners waving their computer generated plumage around, trying to attract a recruiter. This happens with every tech bubble. They did it with the blockchain until the NFT market sank corporate interest, and they'll move on to the next thing once AI loses the eye of investors.
>AIshit
UR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
GGGGGGGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODD MMMMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRNNING SIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRRRRS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DO NOT REDEEM THE GIFT CARD FOR THE FREE TOILET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU ARE NEED TO MAKE THE POO POO IN THE STREETS LIKE THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
*BBBBBBBRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT*
OOH YUMMY STINKY POO POO THAT LOOKS AND FEELS AND TASTES AND SMELLS JUST LIKE CURRY
*OM NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM*
CHUNKY DIARRHEA IS THE BEST POO POO BECAUSE YOU CAN SMEAR IT ALL OVER YOUR SKIN, ESPECIALLY YOUR GAY BOYFRIEND'S PENIS SO YOU CAN EAT THE POO POO AND SUCK DICK AT THE SAME TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
COWS ARE SACRED BECAUSE THEY MAKE THE MOST BESTEST POO POOS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE HIGHEST LUXURY IN INDIA IS TO FEED A COW LAXATIVES AND THEN STICK YOUR HEAD UP ITS butthole!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE ELDERLY CANNOT CONTROL THEIR BOWELS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ANALLY RAPE YOUR GRANDPARENTS SO YOU CAN GET THEIR POO POO ON YOUR PENIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MY ONE AND ONLY WISH IS TO HAVE THE ENTIRE GANGES RIVER TURN INTO POO POO AND THEN DROWN IN IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I don't understand 'artists'
You claim that AI can't generate images of acceptable quality and thus will never replace you, yet you have meltdowns every time someone even brings up the concept of AI art.
These threads are not intended to shill or advance AI. They are, in fact, a stealth means of denigrating the technology as well as the people who promote it.
I mean it. There is no way anyone can be so clueless as to make threads like this in all sincerity. There just isn't.
>rudimentary
Be honest, anon. If you saw this posted somewhere two or three years ago, before ai art was a thing and you absolutely believed it's a digital drawing... would you call it rudimentary or amazing?
>, painted all the little details
NTA but as a drawgay I immediately noticed the fact that the crosshatching on her left arm is incomplete, but that's probably because I have OCD. Also there's something weird about her torso that I can't put my finger on. Something about the way her crotch and six pack are oriented makes one look too high or something.
9 months ago
Anonymous
Sure, but that's now that you know a.i. exists. three years ago, you'd be impressed.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>Sure, but that's now that you know a.i. exists. three years ago, you'd be impressed.
Three years ago those flaws would still exist.
Absolutely not, it's already based on some of the most soulless artists out there so even ignoring the multitude of errors it's still generic garbage in terms of aesthetic. Just that dime a dozen anime-esque bullshit that never looked good.
>Animators
Anon. There's no real professional animators. Most 2D movies and TV shows are actually animated in soul-less factories in Vietnam by people just doing simplistic shit in a dark basement, getting paid minimum wages even for a third world country and having no idea what the thing they're animating is or ever even watching the result of their labor.
>N- no! AI art is ugly and just a fad! just like those lame cgi effects will eventually be abandoned for superior practical FX, and people will buy again CD's and DVD's!
Live in denial if you must. Some of us just need to live in the real world.
>>N- no! AI art is ugly and just a fad! just like those lame cgi effects will eventually be abandoned for superior practical FX, and people will buy again CD's and DVD's! >Live in denial if you must. Some of us just need to live in the real world.
it really, really doesn't
the frick is wrong with her hands?
If you can recognize the character then it's on model.
The damage Rebecca Sugar has done to western animation is indescribable.
Not too bad
>AI comments
>AI invent a irrefuteable argument
>follow up it by posting a picture of my opponets in a mocking demeanor
>end all my posts with "sneed"
>that is all
>AI mind
>Implying that artists can draw perfectly their characters hands.
Do you really think AI is not gonna improve it's drawing? AI advanced a lot in the past 2 years.
It advanced a lot in the first 6 months, when everyone who worked on AI realized they had to publish their models now to ride on the AI hype wave, and then people combined those models privately. Since then there has been no advancements (with visual art)
>Since then there has been no advancements (with visual art)
Just wait, Zoomer wants everything now kek.
It's quality animation.
Is that really any worse than shit like this?
Cartoons often can't even be assed to draw five fingers.
There are worse mistakes than that in literally every frame of every episode of Steven Universe
You people keep insulting AI for it's looks as if that matters, its petty nonsense. Real art has lumpy or ugly looking moments too, and AI will only get better. The issue isn't looks, thats a psyop by AIgays so that they can strike back against it when the technology improves. There's plenty of real reasons not to like artificial, souless fast-food NPC slop, that aren't "durr it look bad".
This shit is made for machines who don't want art, they want product. And NPC will never improve or change their mind, that's why we call them NPCs. Ignore em, make better art, frick AI, frick OP, frick Albania, and frick (you).
Why is Albania catching strays
Yeah AI is a tool to aid art, its not the second coming of christ as AIgays endlessly screech
Is that even a question that deserves to be asked anon?
Go watch fricking netflixvania if you want "beautiful and captivating designs" that looks like this
good post
>Go watch fricking netflixvania if you want "beautiful and captivating designs" that looks like this
I wouldn't be surprised if the new show used AI, the last shot of Richter didn't look like a person made it
Im glad that Cinemaphile, no matter their differences and disagreements and how diverse they are, can all come into agreement on hating netflixvania
>Go watch fricking netflixvania if you want "beautiful and captivating designs" that looks like this
gladly
check'd, AI gays and Albanians BTFOd
AI Shills are actual NPCs it’s crazy
Trying to AI every frame is a mistake. They should try to AI some 3d models, and then AI their movement scripts. Then you have something you can edit and nudge to fix the bugs.
it does,I hate to admit it but it does. No that hard considering most of the present day artists don't give a frick about making stuff with beautiful and captivating designs
why is there a israeliteel embedded in her wrist
It's a Tales of Symphonia spinoff.
Isn't it depressing that we used to think machines would do all the manual labor while people could fully dedicate themselves to artistic and intellectual pursuits, yet in reality it's the other way around?
Turns out it's more cost effective to replace a poet or a programmer or a lawyer than replacing a miner or a tomato picker.
There will always be a job for humans down in the mines gathering sulphur and cobalt and getting lung cancer when you're 35
Once you pay people insanely low wages they become cheaper than machines.
I don't understand why chuds are cheering for this. Do they hate art?
Because they are uncreative normies and don't think art is valuable enough to dedicate themselves to it, most are just on AI either for money, fame or trends.
It's less hatred of art and more hatred of artists which is absolutely garbage because the only thing separating them from that group is the lack of experience and/or effort.
Yes.
The insipid soullessn vermin who have infiltrated art and turned it to ugly garbage deserve replacement.
Yes. They hate art and artists
Art is for homosexuals
this is just artist hubris; thinking their call is special; to the average person theres no difference between them and a farmer being replaced
>so used to being a coosomer that can't different art from a cashier job
>mfw you chose anything as a profession other than fixing toilets
Hey, Bing Chat, my toilet's clogged. Tell me how to fix it in easy steps.
the technology to make machines do manual labor is already something that can be implemented it's just not done because jobs can control the people, but art is pointless so replacing artists is totally fine because that just means more people can work at the onions factory doing labor all day
Today I will remind them
Good morning sirs
>virgin management consultant vs chad MIT PhD
Someone explain why indians have an obsession with ai
No one who puts their preferred pronouns in their profile is a chad.
India still lives under a rigorous caste system because they made the English frick off before the process of destroying it was complete. Because of this, low caste people are locked into a fugue state: they live the lives of second class citizens, but have received enough westernized education to dream of social mobility, especially if they leave the country.
Many companies with international hiring programs have big personnel bases in the United States, and the US has an extremely lenient form of visa called the H1-B. If you have technical skills and a job offer, you can apply for an H1-B, and then the US holds a lottery to determine which applicants can move on over. The odds of getting drawn for a predetermined number of visas are, naturally, based on how many people apply, but it can be anywhere from a 5% to a 30% chance of success (and if you fail, you just try again next year). Plus, once you win, you get 6 years in America before you have to go through the lottery again, during which you can hopefully find a citizen to marry and make your escape permanent.
The key to the H1-B is, again, the combination of technical skills and a job offer. If you're a world-class talent, the job offer comes easy, and you actually get better odds in the lottery because a subset of the visas are set aside for advanced degrees. If you're not a world class talent, an easy way to hedge your bet is to pivot and specialize in emerging tech, because there's often more job postings and less experts for these positions. The Indian guys acting like they'd give their life to defend a large language model are essentially peawieners waving their computer generated plumage around, trying to attract a recruiter. This happens with every tech bubble. They did it with the blockchain until the NFT market sank corporate interest, and they'll move on to the next thing once AI loses the eye of investors.
Who are you quoting?
why does she have the fingers of a deformed italian man? why does this still look like a lazily traced rotoscope?
>AIshit
UR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURR DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
GGGGGGGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODD MMMMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRNNING SIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRRRRS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DO NOT REDEEM THE GIFT CARD FOR THE FREE TOILET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU ARE NEED TO MAKE THE POO POO IN THE STREETS LIKE THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
*BBBBBBBRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT*
OOH YUMMY STINKY POO POO THAT LOOKS AND FEELS AND TASTES AND SMELLS JUST LIKE CURRY
*OM NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM*
CHUNKY DIARRHEA IS THE BEST POO POO BECAUSE YOU CAN SMEAR IT ALL OVER YOUR SKIN, ESPECIALLY YOUR GAY BOYFRIEND'S PENIS SO YOU CAN EAT THE POO POO AND SUCK DICK AT THE SAME TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
COWS ARE SACRED BECAUSE THEY MAKE THE MOST BESTEST POO POOS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE HIGHEST LUXURY IN INDIA IS TO FEED A COW LAXATIVES AND THEN STICK YOUR HEAD UP ITS butthole!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE ELDERLY CANNOT CONTROL THEIR BOWELS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ANALLY RAPE YOUR GRANDPARENTS SO YOU CAN GET THEIR POO POO ON YOUR PENIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MY ONE AND ONLY WISH IS TO HAVE THE ENTIRE GANGES RIVER TURN INTO POO POO AND THEN DROWN IN IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It doesnt even look like a cartoon
I don't understand 'artists'
You claim that AI can't generate images of acceptable quality and thus will never replace you, yet you have meltdowns every time someone even brings up the concept of AI art.
>i dont understand chefs, you claim mcdonalds is worthless slop yet you get mad at it
yeah....
>food analogy
Artists are so moronic
its ok, not understanding analogies is a common sign of autism
youre not alone anon, help is out there
These threads are not intended to shill or advance AI. They are, in fact, a stealth means of denigrating the technology as well as the people who promote it.
I mean it. There is no way anyone can be so clueless as to make threads like this in all sincerity. There just isn't.
I just like proompting. Sue me.
And if I want to proompt large breasted women, I shouldn’t be chastised, mocked, or persecuted for doing so.
>I shouldn’t be chastised, mocked, or persecuted for doing so.
I will definitely continue mocking you.
What model?
lmao you're not being persecuted, you're being mocked for posting that shit and thinking it looks good.
I too like large breasts
Sneed Ham
That's fine. Just don't post it and pretend like you've done anything except spawn the most rudimentary of jerkoff material.
>rudimentary
Be honest, anon. If you saw this posted somewhere two or three years ago, before ai art was a thing and you absolutely believed it's a digital drawing... would you call it rudimentary or amazing?
I certainly wouldn't call it amazing.
Really? If you thought a real human artist sketched it, outlined it, painted all the little details... you would be like "meh. I'm not impressed."
Correct. Overly rendered digital art is boring. AI or not
You can find something boring and still appreciate it technically, anon.
If it was physical art, I'd appreciate the technique. I don't care for digital.
And why Bosch? Are you implying he's boring?
>, painted all the little details
NTA but as a drawgay I immediately noticed the fact that the crosshatching on her left arm is incomplete, but that's probably because I have OCD. Also there's something weird about her torso that I can't put my finger on. Something about the way her crotch and six pack are oriented makes one look too high or something.
Sure, but that's now that you know a.i. exists. three years ago, you'd be impressed.
>Sure, but that's now that you know a.i. exists. three years ago, you'd be impressed.
Three years ago those flaws would still exist.
Absolutely not, it's already based on some of the most soulless artists out there so even ignoring the multitude of errors it's still generic garbage in terms of aesthetic. Just that dime a dozen anime-esque bullshit that never looked good.
it's just Sakimichan style slop
Fricked up hands.
>Animators
Anon. There's no real professional animators. Most 2D movies and TV shows are actually animated in soul-less factories in Vietnam by people just doing simplistic shit in a dark basement, getting paid minimum wages even for a third world country and having no idea what the thing they're animating is or ever even watching the result of their labor.
>2023
>still hating AI
Reminder that Disney is going to buy all the good AI programs and spew out 20 new films a month about a turd with feelings and you'll be happy
As opposed to the amazing and wonderful slop we're getting now about puddles falling in love with campfires?
The same thing but AI generated will be so much better
you will eat the slop and be happy about it, piggies
the fricking jannies need to do their jobs and delete these obvious bait threads
it looks like computer generated pigslop, because it is.
It looks like shit and you know it.
>People believing in human artisany being somehow sacred.
Ah. Children.
>People believing art has no intrinsic value
Ah. Children.
No, grownups know that terms like "intrinsic value" are meaningless bullshit. Children don't.
your taste is bad and you should feel bad.
I'm so glad the rest of the world is laughing at you AI art fluffers.
>N- no! AI art is ugly and just a fad! just like those lame cgi effects will eventually be abandoned for superior practical FX, and people will buy again CD's and DVD's!
Live in denial if you must. Some of us just need to live in the real world.
>>N- no! AI art is ugly and just a fad! just like those lame cgi effects will eventually be abandoned for superior practical FX, and people will buy again CD's and DVD's!
>Live in denial if you must. Some of us just need to live in the real world.
>loves AI
>didn’t use an AI image
Every time
It looks like those more blatantly rotoscoped moments from Ralph Bakshi's Lord of the Rings
Rotoscoped animation never looked good, it’s okay when used sparingly but otherwise it’s uncanny
>it isn't even a cloud
this is the power of AI, huh?