A kid had diarrhea during the showing two rows in front of me. They offered to refund tickets or let people wait to see the next showing with free popcorn and soda.
I used to think working at a theater would be aweseome. Then I grew up and realized all the rancid shit I would have to clean up >jizz >used condoms >spilled food and drink >barf >piss >shit >dealing with drunks, loud and/or aggressive patrons
Boy, I dodged a bullet with them turning down my application with that one.
I'm mad they didn't have a small segment of Mike checking the cameras only to notice one of the animatronics are gone, and pressing the buttons to use the doors.
I felt like it was missing something like that and: >flashback of Vanessa in the pizzeria showing what it was like back then >Spring Bonnie chasing and toying with Mike a bit longer, being creepy and having fun wtih the situation >closure scene related to the aunt's death
>flashback of Vanessa in the pizzeria showing what it was like back then
yes, this shouldve replaced the intro sequence, wouldve been kino. >Spring Bonnie chasing and toying with Mike a bit longer, being creepy and having fun wtih the situation
he shouldve showed up way earlier, having him only show up at the end was so fricking stupid. having him see spring bonnie occasionally and having william show up more so he didnt just disappear out of nowhere wouldve been nice. >closure scene related to the aunt's death
they shouldve omitted the sister/aunt plot altogether. shouldve just been mike saving the kids because of his brother and showed more of him actually guarding the place without the stupid dreams. its insane how they decided instead of doing scenes where he is watching the cams, he is sleeping and replaying the same sequence over and over. so ridiculous.
movie wouldve been kino if it was him and vanessa teamed up against the animatronics with no scenes of them playing. end it with them figuring out afton is controlling them and that he was the bonnie that was fricking with them the whole time, and then revealed that golden freddy was his brother which is why he says the "its me" message. ending the movie with a better spring lock scene, and still with the animatronics dragging him to the room in the back too.
god, it makes me so mad that they fricked up something so, so simple. scott is a loser.
>having william show up more so he didnt just disappear out of nowhere
That is true! Oh, how about if after the break-in he calls William up and is like 'Hey an officer came down and said there was a break in yesterday. Sorry that happened. What should I do about it?' and then have William go like 'Oh an officer, really? Ah well don't worry about it. Just clean the place up, I'm sure it wasn't anything serious heheh' and then show him getting angry at his office and say something like 'Hehehe this is getting messy. She shouldn't have gone there.' making it unclear who he is refering too (Max? the Aunt? etc.).
tbh anything wouldve been better than we what we got.
the movie introduced characters, did a little bit with them, then dropped them in favor of something else until they realized they had to take their stories somewhere so they wrapped things up sloppily.
we got what, 2 scenes of william before the fricking OBVIOUS reveal at the end? we shouldve had him at least pretending to help mike and introduce another shady character or have vanessa acting suspicious and disappearing before spring bonnie appears or something. i just dont understand why they couldnt have tried harder. or even at all.
Vanessa felt like a red herring to anyone that continued to play into the games that far
>the reasoning behind him running into william being "he just happened to be the guy helping him get a job" made me wanna blow my brains out.
This twist only exists as a double gotcha moment since we already knew Shaggy was going to be playing Williams
Personally I think the dude should have already have been dead by the time the movie started
His control over the kids shouldn't have been some stupid shit where they're all friendly with him, it should have been out of fear and malice. The part where the sister reminds the kids that Afton killed them by replacing a drawing with a different one was pants on head moronic
>This twist only exists as a double gotcha moment since we already knew Shaggy was going to be playing Williams
that only worked so well, though. the scene where he stops his last name halfway through made it clear what was going on. >Personally I think the dude should have already have been dead by the time the movie started
i liked getting to see the springlock scene. again tho, i think he shouldve interacted more with mike before the reveal and made us second guess him really being afton.
it felt like they thought that if they just dropped william, then people would forget and be like >no wayy i forgot about him! he is the bad guy?? no way!!!!
>You know what works for me? A warm glass of milk with camomile and honey.
We could have done away with the dream sequence scenes or Mikes connection to Williams being that he killed Mikes little brother or Vanessa being in the movie at all
Felt like they wanted to take the movie into a direction no one would predict and that landed us with a haphazard of an ending
>dream sequence scenes or Mikes connection to Williams being that he killed Mikes little brother or Vanessa being in the movie at all
i agree on all points, but i dont think vanessa was a bad addition. the little sister and aunt subplot fricked with the movie big time, i kept thinking about that while watching it. i think having mike's little brother be something of importance, and giving him a reason to have met afton in the first place would help the movie a lot.
the reasoning behind him running into william being "he just happened to be the guy helping him get a job" made me wanna blow my brains out.
Vanessa felt like a red herring to anyone that continued to play into the games that far
>the reasoning behind him running into william being "he just happened to be the guy helping him get a job" made me wanna blow my brains out.
This twist only exists as a double gotcha moment since we already knew Shaggy was going to be playing Williams
Personally I think the dude should have already have been dead by the time the movie started
His control over the kids shouldn't have been some stupid shit where they're all friendly with him, it should have been out of fear and malice. The part where the sister reminds the kids that Afton killed them by replacing a drawing with a different one was pants on head moronic
Literally an 80s horror flick, they don't make movies like this anymore, so I'm hyped to see the sequel.
I'll put it next to Nightmare on Elms Street movies level.
tbh anything wouldve been better than we what we got.
the movie introduced characters, did a little bit with them, then dropped them in favor of something else until they realized they had to take their stories somewhere so they wrapped things up sloppily.
we got what, 2 scenes of william before the fricking OBVIOUS reveal at the end? we shouldve had him at least pretending to help mike and introduce another shady character or have vanessa acting suspicious and disappearing before spring bonnie appears or something. i just dont understand why they couldnt have tried harder. or even at all.
[...] >This twist only exists as a double gotcha moment since we already knew Shaggy was going to be playing Williams
that only worked so well, though. the scene where he stops his last name halfway through made it clear what was going on. >Personally I think the dude should have already have been dead by the time the movie started
i liked getting to see the springlock scene. again tho, i think he shouldve interacted more with mike before the reveal and made us second guess him really being afton.
it felt like they thought that if they just dropped william, then people would forget and be like >no wayy i forgot about him! he is the bad guy?? no way!!!!
[...]
why did he do it?
Was this meant to imply Mike is racist? Did Raimi have a hand in this film's production?
and THAT is never explained, either. it would only make sense if the springlocks had already got him.
also, the springlock design was atrocious. the games made it look like they were holding the animatronic endo out of place, but the movie made it seem like theyre sharp claws that exist for.. literally no reason. what the frick, scott?
The moment he exerted any sort of force that pushed Mike 10 feet into the air William would have gotten springlocked him getting springlocked because of the fricking cupcake biting a chunk off the suit was dumb and him saying he always comes back was eyerolling since that only ever mattered after he repeatedly died
He only put on the suit to hide from the Animatronics, how would he know if he's gonna somehow get resurrected like them
You fricking morons he put on the suit hat and said "I always come back" because he knows he's gonna end up possessing the suit due to his experiments extracting remnant from the previous guards. What the frick else did you think the blender mask was? Plainly obvious this is setting up a lot of shit that will come into play in other movies
None of what you said was mentioned in the movie ya Dumb homosexual
As far as we knew the Animatronics just had a nasty habit of killing people up until we find out Afton was using them for "reasons" and those reasons aren't even explained. He's just doing that to the Security guards for fun
You'd have to play the games to know what Williams motives are or get into the shitty lore. His only child that is mentioned in-movie is Vanessa and that's it. The bite of 87 isn't even mentioned I think and if it was it doesn't play any significant role
There's nothing else to it
Scott understands his fans are smart enough to figure out background plot details without him spelling it out. You unironically have to have a very high IQ to understand FNAF, which is why so many midwits get angered by the lore, their tiny brains can't figure it out and so rather than accepting it's beyond them they resort to calling it sour grapes.
I had to explain to another friend that William wasn't actually wearing "power armor", he's just cartoonishly strong in the lore for some reason (even as a human).
Vanessa felt like a red herring to anyone that continued to play into the games that far
>the reasoning behind him running into william being "he just happened to be the guy helping him get a job" made me wanna blow my brains out.
This twist only exists as a double gotcha moment since we already knew Shaggy was going to be playing Williams
Personally I think the dude should have already have been dead by the time the movie started
His control over the kids shouldn't have been some stupid shit where they're all friendly with him, it should have been out of fear and malice. The part where the sister reminds the kids that Afton killed them by replacing a drawing with a different one was pants on head moronic
That last part was taken from The Fourth Closet and it was equally moronic there.
it was better than the mario movie which was so polished and revised you could barely tell humans worked on it. At least FNAFs bad writing was fun to peel apart. characters with no motivations, conflicts that just get forgot about, wild tonal whiplash, scenes, hell yea frick me up
big fan of how they couldn't figure out how to end the climax scene properly so they just kind of have the protagonists go oh well i guess thats done and just walk out once the other characters get their resolution. only being a horror movie for a single scene then forgetting about it to establish love interests and action setpieces and random shit is pretty funny too
the whole pedo serial killer hunting bit with dreams was so weird and out of place. could have easily just had the movie exist with zero supernatural elements, feels like they wrote it and someone stepped in to say 'no people are autistic about these games you have to add in all this lore shit'
like he already has the motivation of the sister girl, they didnt need a second sibling also. especially feels stapled ontop when they sort of forget about his brother and only resolve the sister conflict.
i dont actually know any lore so im assuming its from the game unless theyre just making up random shit. it might as well been none of it was interesting or unique
>game about ghost kids possessing 80s animatronics >could have easily just had the movie exist with zero supernatural elements
Are you genuinely moronic?
Talking about the genre, tone, gameplay, actual function of the game. Not random lore details. dont care about lore. Its a horror game, movie isnt a horror.
also played the first one never got anything about ghost kids. Just some technical explanation about the robots kill you by trying to put you into a costume
>also played the first one never got anything about ghost kids. Just some technical explanation about the robots kill you by trying to put you into a costume
People knew about the ghost kids from the first game you're just a dumbfrick. Why do you think The Living Tombstone's FNAF 1 song is about ghost kids?
Also what's your explanation for 80s animatronics getting up and walking around better than modern Boston Dynamics robots, moron? That in of itself shows there's something supernatural happening.
I don't remember if Mike is a separate person or one of Williams kids with a fake name but as far as I remember initially Mike was just some dude who eventually dies at the end of the game
Hell, Vanessa's relations to William is that of a follower rather than a daughter. It's only speculated that they're related and she doesn't appear to several games later
The movie combines elements from multiple games and lore into one movie which plays into why it's not good
I think you just miss some references here and there
I followed it well enough, but I was watching with someone who was already invested so I occasionally asked about something specific or about a character
No, it was just simply bad. I am glad for the anons who could enjoy it but I just couldn't. >PG-13 >16+ in europe
Look, I know kids loved the series but I just can't understand why they went with an agerating THIS low. This is perhaps the largest problems of the movie, it handicapped them from making to movie... well scary. I appreciate that the animatronics were actually puppets and not CG but frick me this was supposed to be a horror movie.
A kid had diarrhea during the showing two rows in front of me. They offered to refund tickets or let people wait to see the next showing with free popcorn and soda.
What the frick? Did it shoot out over you all like a garden hose or something?
I used to think working at a theater would be aweseome. Then I grew up and realized all the rancid shit I would have to clean up
>jizz
>used condoms
>spilled food and drink
>barf
>piss
>shit
>dealing with drunks, loud and/or aggressive patrons
Boy, I dodged a bullet with them turning down my application with that one.
>soulfully
meh ill give it that, but only that. sucks that scott was as involved as he was because he is a COMPLETE hack.
I'm mad they didn't have a small segment of Mike checking the cameras only to notice one of the animatronics are gone, and pressing the buttons to use the doors.
I felt like it was missing something like that and:
>flashback of Vanessa in the pizzeria showing what it was like back then
>Spring Bonnie chasing and toying with Mike a bit longer, being creepy and having fun wtih the situation
>closure scene related to the aunt's death
>flashback of Vanessa in the pizzeria showing what it was like back then
yes, this shouldve replaced the intro sequence, wouldve been kino.
>Spring Bonnie chasing and toying with Mike a bit longer, being creepy and having fun wtih the situation
he shouldve showed up way earlier, having him only show up at the end was so fricking stupid. having him see spring bonnie occasionally and having william show up more so he didnt just disappear out of nowhere wouldve been nice.
>closure scene related to the aunt's death
they shouldve omitted the sister/aunt plot altogether. shouldve just been mike saving the kids because of his brother and showed more of him actually guarding the place without the stupid dreams. its insane how they decided instead of doing scenes where he is watching the cams, he is sleeping and replaying the same sequence over and over. so ridiculous.
movie wouldve been kino if it was him and vanessa teamed up against the animatronics with no scenes of them playing. end it with them figuring out afton is controlling them and that he was the bonnie that was fricking with them the whole time, and then revealed that golden freddy was his brother which is why he says the "its me" message. ending the movie with a better spring lock scene, and still with the animatronics dragging him to the room in the back too.
god, it makes me so mad that they fricked up something so, so simple. scott is a loser.
>having william show up more so he didnt just disappear out of nowhere
That is true! Oh, how about if after the break-in he calls William up and is like 'Hey an officer came down and said there was a break in yesterday. Sorry that happened. What should I do about it?' and then have William go like 'Oh an officer, really? Ah well don't worry about it. Just clean the place up, I'm sure it wasn't anything serious heheh' and then show him getting angry at his office and say something like 'Hehehe this is getting messy. She shouldn't have gone there.' making it unclear who he is refering too (Max? the Aunt? etc.).
tbh anything wouldve been better than we what we got.
the movie introduced characters, did a little bit with them, then dropped them in favor of something else until they realized they had to take their stories somewhere so they wrapped things up sloppily.
we got what, 2 scenes of william before the fricking OBVIOUS reveal at the end? we shouldve had him at least pretending to help mike and introduce another shady character or have vanessa acting suspicious and disappearing before spring bonnie appears or something. i just dont understand why they couldnt have tried harder. or even at all.
>This twist only exists as a double gotcha moment since we already knew Shaggy was going to be playing Williams
that only worked so well, though. the scene where he stops his last name halfway through made it clear what was going on.
>Personally I think the dude should have already have been dead by the time the movie started
i liked getting to see the springlock scene. again tho, i think he shouldve interacted more with mike before the reveal and made us second guess him really being afton.
it felt like they thought that if they just dropped william, then people would forget and be like
>no wayy i forgot about him! he is the bad guy?? no way!!!!
why did he do it?
We could have done away with the dream sequence scenes or Mikes connection to Williams being that he killed Mikes little brother or Vanessa being in the movie at all
Felt like they wanted to take the movie into a direction no one would predict and that landed us with a haphazard of an ending
>dream sequence scenes or Mikes connection to Williams being that he killed Mikes little brother or Vanessa being in the movie at all
i agree on all points, but i dont think vanessa was a bad addition. the little sister and aunt subplot fricked with the movie big time, i kept thinking about that while watching it. i think having mike's little brother be something of importance, and giving him a reason to have met afton in the first place would help the movie a lot.
the reasoning behind him running into william being "he just happened to be the guy helping him get a job" made me wanna blow my brains out.
no, not really.
Vanessa felt like a red herring to anyone that continued to play into the games that far
>the reasoning behind him running into william being "he just happened to be the guy helping him get a job" made me wanna blow my brains out.
This twist only exists as a double gotcha moment since we already knew Shaggy was going to be playing Williams
Personally I think the dude should have already have been dead by the time the movie started
His control over the kids shouldn't have been some stupid shit where they're all friendly with him, it should have been out of fear and malice. The part where the sister reminds the kids that Afton killed them by replacing a drawing with a different one was pants on head moronic
I can't wait to find out that 20 minutes was cut from this movie
Weren’t anons claiming that the movie was supposed to be three hours long earlier in the year?
It should've been at least 2 hours. The producers should've been smart enough to make the movie fit in that time length
Willys wonderland was better
no
It was pretty good, better than I expected.
Literally an 80s horror flick, they don't make movies like this anymore, so I'm hyped to see the sequel.
I'll put it next to Nightmare on Elms Street movies level.
The shills won and I'm about halfway through the movie. It's not the least bit interesting.
>You know what works for me? A warm glass of milk with camomile and honey.
Holy shit, I read this the moment he said the line
Fricking hell lol
I felt like that scene was a reference to something. Am I overthinking it? Or was it just to be funny and show Mike was being rude?
Was this meant to imply Mike is racist? Did Raimi have a hand in this film's production?
>Raimi
The guy who had Rachel McAdams marry a Black person?
give me a download link
go to your private tracker of choice and find it yourself.
*throws you around like fricking iron man*
Legit only based part of this film and he dies in like two seconds. Realistically, throwing him about like that would have set the locks off instantly
and THAT is never explained, either. it would only make sense if the springlocks had already got him.
also, the springlock design was atrocious. the games made it look like they were holding the animatronic endo out of place, but the movie made it seem like theyre sharp claws that exist for.. literally no reason. what the frick, scott?
It's a shame really. It must've took a lot of work to make the animatronics just so they could be in a mediocre movie.
i remember those getting teased over the years and yeah, they put a frick ton of work into it. it genuinely makes me sad.
The moment he exerted any sort of force that pushed Mike 10 feet into the air William would have gotten springlocked
him getting springlocked because of the fricking cupcake biting a chunk off the suit was dumb and him saying he always comes back was eyerolling since that only ever mattered after he repeatedly died
He only put on the suit to hide from the Animatronics, how would he know if he's gonna somehow get resurrected like them
yeah the springlock scene was horribly, horribly done.
You fricking morons he put on the suit hat and said "I always come back" because he knows he's gonna end up possessing the suit due to his experiments extracting remnant from the previous guards. What the frick else did you think the blender mask was? Plainly obvious this is setting up a lot of shit that will come into play in other movies
None of what you said was mentioned in the movie ya Dumb homosexual
As far as we knew the Animatronics just had a nasty habit of killing people up until we find out Afton was using them for "reasons" and those reasons aren't even explained. He's just doing that to the Security guards for fun
You'd have to play the games to know what Williams motives are or get into the shitty lore. His only child that is mentioned in-movie is Vanessa and that's it. The bite of 87 isn't even mentioned I think and if it was it doesn't play any significant role
There's nothing else to it
You're moronic
Scott understands his fans are smart enough to figure out background plot details without him spelling it out. You unironically have to have a very high IQ to understand FNAF, which is why so many midwits get angered by the lore, their tiny brains can't figure it out and so rather than accepting it's beyond them they resort to calling it sour grapes.
>him getting springlocked because of the fricking cupcake biting a chunk off the suit was dumb
That was kino.
I had to explain to another friend that William wasn't actually wearing "power armor", he's just cartoonishly strong in the lore for some reason (even as a human).
That last part was taken from The Fourth Closet and it was equally moronic there.
>If you bring Abbie back here I will shoot you!
What did she mean by this
idk, i think she was saying if he brought his sister to the pizzeria she would kill him? not sure tho.
She's 'merican
>Abbie's babysitter
Freddy can fit alot in his mouth
it was better than the mario movie which was so polished and revised you could barely tell humans worked on it. At least FNAFs bad writing was fun to peel apart. characters with no motivations, conflicts that just get forgot about, wild tonal whiplash, scenes, hell yea frick me up
big fan of how they couldn't figure out how to end the climax scene properly so they just kind of have the protagonists go oh well i guess thats done and just walk out once the other characters get their resolution. only being a horror movie for a single scene then forgetting about it to establish love interests and action setpieces and random shit is pretty funny too
thought it was a fun watch with my loregay roommate though I don't know I he wanted me to take it a bit more seriously
I stick to the cage one
the whole pedo serial killer hunting bit with dreams was so weird and out of place. could have easily just had the movie exist with zero supernatural elements, feels like they wrote it and someone stepped in to say 'no people are autistic about these games you have to add in all this lore shit'
like he already has the motivation of the sister girl, they didnt need a second sibling also. especially feels stapled ontop when they sort of forget about his brother and only resolve the sister conflict.
i dont actually know any lore so im assuming its from the game unless theyre just making up random shit. it might as well been none of it was interesting or unique
>game about ghost kids possessing 80s animatronics
>could have easily just had the movie exist with zero supernatural elements
Are you genuinely moronic?
Talking about the genre, tone, gameplay, actual function of the game. Not random lore details. dont care about lore. Its a horror game, movie isnt a horror.
also played the first one never got anything about ghost kids. Just some technical explanation about the robots kill you by trying to put you into a costume
>also played the first one never got anything about ghost kids. Just some technical explanation about the robots kill you by trying to put you into a costume
People knew about the ghost kids from the first game you're just a dumbfrick. Why do you think The Living Tombstone's FNAF 1 song is about ghost kids?
Also what's your explanation for 80s animatronics getting up and walking around better than modern Boston Dynamics robots, moron? That in of itself shows there's something supernatural happening.
I don't remember if Mike is a separate person or one of Williams kids with a fake name but as far as I remember initially Mike was just some dude who eventually dies at the end of the game
Hell, Vanessa's relations to William is that of a follower rather than a daughter. It's only speculated that they're related and she doesn't appear to several games later
The movie combines elements from multiple games and lore into one movie which plays into why it's not good
Do I have to be familiar with the games to watch. I know absolutely nothing about this shit
I think you just miss some references here and there
I followed it well enough, but I was watching with someone who was already invested so I occasionally asked about something specific or about a character
No, it was just simply bad. I am glad for the anons who could enjoy it but I just couldn't.
>PG-13
>16+ in europe
Look, I know kids loved the series but I just can't understand why they went with an agerating THIS low. This is perhaps the largest problems of the movie, it handicapped them from making to movie... well scary. I appreciate that the animatronics were actually puppets and not CG but frick me this was supposed to be a horror movie.