ITT:

Kek props to Industrycuck for managing to be relevant even outside of this website

You can tell anti neopuritan got under their skin. He's doing god's work.

Did you actually watch the video? Because I knew nothing about this, watched it, and just hear a few guys laughing about some moron. They talk about it for a minute, if that, and it's
"You gota see it's most amazing thing, he made like a graphic; he is like schizoid obsessed" and then back to the game.

I think it was this

Is there?

This has gotta be bait, but with these types of people it's hard to tell.

>seething christhomosexuals

you hate christianity because it holds you accountable for your actions and you don't want to feel bad about doing gross and depraved things. That's literally it

>The Orthodox church is for pigmen and pigfricker children.
Let me fix that for you
> All religion is for pigmen and pigfricker children.

>Atheists
Atheists are children who are stuck in a false dichotomy.
Deism is the real way.

>Why would I believe in a magic sky daddy that doesn't do anything

>Posts are just namecalling
>People ad hom back
>NOOOOO! HOW COULD THIS BE HAPPENING TO MEEEEEE!!

I'd rather take "we don't know yet, but we'll keep questioning" than "God is always the answer and no you can't question it at all

There is no reasonable or rational debate/discussion possible when it comes to religion
Thats what it is a vastly inferior explanation for anything when compared to atheism

>r/atheism is private
*isn't
Typo.

from reason.
>What do you mean?
...It's the name of a specific argument from apologists in the past you moron.
You're sitting here trying to jerk off anons about "muh debate," but you've never actually looked at what debates were had outside of Youtube clips?

>I just skimmed the Wikipedia page, so basically
In other words, you don't have any idea what the argument says, nor did you know shit about it.

>"nothing can be proven either way therefor its all true"
You want a rational counterargument, yet when given something to work it, all you have is this incorrect reductionist take?
To give a better simplification, naturalistic beliefs are self-contradictory. Another force in the universe should then be considered outside of naturalistic views.
C.S. Lewis and the like trying to extend this to the Christian God goes outside of the scope of the argument (as criticized), but it does provide reasoning for why someone could feasibly look towards the existence of a mover outside of naturalistic atheism.

You.
Dumb.
Frick.

>Why do you assume there HAS to be some "force"
Because it's not nothing.
In the purposes of debate/argument, "naturalism" means the belief that all of reality exists entirely within conventionally natural means.
I know you're the type of Redditard who probably thinks it just means a fancy synonym for "nudism," but come on. This shit is BASIC.

>And what's wrong with that?
The argument I posted, which you still don't know about, directly challenges the notion you question-begging moron.

>Muh magic

So your argument is just to impress everyone by spamming "rational" over and over.
Cool.

was right. You really don't have anything other than repeating the same buzzwords your friends over at r/atheism jerk each other off with.

Go ahead then, give me a logical and reasonable and rational explanation as to why you'd be religious rather that Atheistic

I never tried to claim atheists are inherently rational, just the ideology of atheism. Atheism as an ideology towards looking at the world is rational, human beings are not rational. That's why you get people like me who despite being an uneducated homosexual, am able to see that atheism makes more sense than religion

>That's why you get people like me who despite
I can guarantee that nobody here is using the guy obsessed with circumcized penises as a measure for what "makes sense."

>because I have something in my brain smarter than yours, although it's not my entire brain
I think you overestimate the value and sentience of Tyrone's semen.

>You don't "need" a reason to believe it, because the belief doesn't actually change who you are.
You need reasons to believe in anything you believe, if you're okay with just accepting "this is true because I say so" you're a loser
Also, religion DOES change who you are, you think anyone would give a shit about the rights of other people if they didn't read in their Bible (written years ago by people of their same association) that they are the most holy and precious sect of human and God loves them more than any other type of human

Here's the thing, with religion, you don't get to change what you "think." The purpose of thinking is finding the truth, you think, then you are eventually able to say "I know." But a religion is "I think this, it is the ultimate answer to everything, therefore I believe it's the answer to everything and I won't allow questions or further thinking

>Deism isn't a religion.
It's still believing in something spiritual, which is stupid

You want me to give an in depth explanation for why believing in ghosts basically isn't rational or logical?

I know what that it, it's what the bird get scared of

It's okay, I have autism too

I've heard of it before, I haven't looked up the definition or cared to
>I'm not upset by what you're saying, just really sad for you.
I'm sad for you too, you seem like someone who's well educated, yet you've been consistently replying to a 20 year old moron trolling on a board for comic books and children's cartoons

Why would I be trying to emotionally manipulate you

Listen, I can tell you're emotionally struggling with this right now. If you'd like, you can continue to contact me through the email [email protected] before this thread inevitably gets deleted

It's not on purpose I'm sorry 🙁

Where do you want me to frick off to, sir?

>i'm just moronic
please start your religious discussion with that next time

Smiling Friends can't even make proper religious discussions.

>That's like the islamophobes that think muslims want LGBT dead because their religion prescribes indifference to violent and oppressive governments.
Are you trying to say that LGBT has any sway in how any government works? You're a fricking moron, the Quran says to brutally murder gays just "because God says so"
Yet their prophet can frick a 9 year old girl and still have people travel across the world to lick that big stupid black box his corpse is in or whatever

>and Pagan religions would have ruled Europe and later the world.
kek, imagine think that some barbarians could even stand against islam.

I thought people with two genitals aren't trans?

Right... what what do we use for people with mental illnesses? Treatments, and what's the best possible treatment for trans people? Unironicly out of all research, its affirmation and allowing them to transition, trying to force them to stay as their assigned gender at birth doesn't work and often makes mental illnesses worse

It's not bait, I know it's hard for you to comprehend (having your own mental illnesses and all) but I genuenly want to defend trans people

have a nice day, chud. Your culture is dying slowly and surely.

how many of them actually get their dick cut off?

i too support chemically castrating the mentally ill
curious what Zack and Chris think about transgenderism. will we see such a thing in Smiling Friends?

You know nothing about SRS if you think it's "chemical castration"

>disabled people are inferior specimen and should not be able to procreate
>can't give a valid reason as to why trans people are "disabled"
Hmm sounds familiar..

80% of all suicides total are cisgender men.
Is there something fundamentally wrong and immoral about the way cis men are that cause them to be mentally ill enough to commit suicide this frequently?

>trannies are a minority
>trannies are the minority of suicides
the S O Y is too deeply ingrained at this point, you can no longer do basic deduction

I wasn't stating that as in "trans people are natural therfore there's nothing wrong with them" what I mean by that is that trans people, for a long portion of society, were accepted, well before there was gender nobody really gave a shit about anything, but even in some old Roman cultures or something I belive, they'd bury trans women as women, in the same tombs as women, with the same types of materials and such you'd also give to women, with their female names. That's what breaks the argument "in 1000 years archeologists will be able to tell your gender through your bones" yeah, and they'll also be able to tell if you were trans

Got any suggestions? Jerking off and eating junk food are pretty much all I do anymore

Yes, even his last name is a play on god. I didn't type the whole thing but you know what I mean; God popping up for a joke isn't the same as shoving religion in your face.