She was great under Byrne and Gerber (and then Byrne again). Modern artists like bartel and the homosexuals doing the interiors on this book (or pulido who may or may not be completely blind) refuse to draw conventionally attractive women. Meanwhile the writers keep trying to make her more of a lawyer than a superhero which NOBODY FRICKING WANTS and refuse to write her into cute little scenarios in which she can wear bikinis and underwear while fighting z-listers (actually fighting now just arguing with or deadpanning while avoiding a fight) in crazy places like space or inside the television. Basically modern writers think “fun” is being as boring, topical and miserable as possible while the artists trace overweight chicks and tren abusing mannish women because of that one “body of olympians” picture they all use to justify her not just being a green 7 foot tall Victoria secret model with a bit more tone.
Also rainbow Rowell in particular sucks because she’s writing her as a comic for women and Jen has always been a female character tailored toward young men.
I'm still somewhat surprised to see so many people bring up writers like Rainbow Rowell and Tini Howard. You should know by now not to read even one page of their writing.
Hatereading for free online to more accurately complain is necessary you casual.
Side note I never watched Deadwood cause it was cancelled and I was worried for a, pun intentional, dead end but I heard the movie makes it worth it. Have o been misled or do I have a solid weekend on my hands if I binge it?
I've always found hatereading to be a massive waste of time. There's so much to read as it is.
Deadwood is not for everyone. It takes a different approach to dialogue, essentially combining Shakespeare and modern-day expletives with a Western. I binged the show and loved it. I haven't watched the Deadwood movie and don't know if I ever will.
There’s not enough new media worthy of praise to consume so hate watching/hatereading is what replaces it. Most of everything is pretty dreadful these days.
I watch plenty of new wave French films and read plenty of books twice my age but I’m not going to immerse myself in days past just to avoid “wasting time”. Even “worthwhile” media is just a pastime after all, a cute phrase for time-waster.
There are hundreds of books I want to read, almost all of them older than me. A decent amount of comics too. I'm ever so slowly working toward completing the list, except the list keeps growing.
Your justifications for hatereading are poor. It seems like you're stuck.
3 months ago
Anonymous
You’re the only type of person worse than a coomer. >there books you haven’t read so you can’t have a negative opinion until you read everything in the history of the world
Meanwhile you’re reading and engaging with COMMENTS ON A MESSAGE BOARD. Go read your fricking books homosexual why are you wasting time arguing online? How do you not see the inherent hypocrisy in what you’re doing?
3 months ago
Anonymous
>there books you haven’t read so you can’t have a negative opinion until you read everything in the history of the world
That has nothing to do with what I said. >why are you wasting time arguing online?
I'm at work with some downtime. I thought this was a peaceful exchange.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>there books you haven’t read so you can’t have a negative opinion until you read everything in the history of the world
That has nothing to do with what I said. >why are you wasting time arguing online?
I'm at work with some downtime. I thought this was a peaceful exchange.
Your justifications for not doing something more enjoyable and productive than b***hing online are poor. I think you’re stuck.
>but I’m not going to immerse myself in days past just to avoid “wasting time”. Even “worthwhile” media is just a pastime after all, a cute phrase for time-waster.
This. I don’t consider “dated” to be a valid demerit but I also am not going to be one of those “born in the wrong era” losers. Not all engagement with society/media needs to be positive.
>refuse to draw conventionally attractive women
Counterpoint: She-Hulk is not a "conventionally" attractive woman, she should have a freakishly huge Amazonian physique.
Unless what you meant was booba and pretty face, in which case sure.
Frick off homosexual, you’re just a coomer who wants your fetish met. I’m so sick of you homosexuals shitting up she-hulk threads
3 months ago
Anonymous
I was literally replying to the first post ITT, discussing She-Hulks appearance. If you have a problem, take it up with the anon I was replying to, you fricking wiener-smoker.
Getting pissy at me for discussing a topic of the thread. Fricking have a nice day.
3 months ago
Anonymous
That's all she's good for.
Unless you like imposter syndrome mousy Jen.
3 months ago
Anonymous
No I like Byrne’s she-hulk, the only one that matters.
I was literally replying to the first post ITT, discussing She-Hulks appearance. If you have a problem, take it up with the anon I was replying to, you fricking wiener-smoker.
Getting pissy at me for discussing a topic of the thread. Fricking have a nice day.
You’re reply was that she isn’t a conventionally attractive character which just exposes that you haven’t read a she-hulk comic. Pulido was the only one that intentionally drew her as ugly when she wasn’t having a savage relapse. Even in the original savage issues by buscema she was a conventionally attractive woman.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>No I like Byrne’s she-hulk, the only one that matters.
Yeah his art really does trick you into thinking Jen is a good character.
3 months ago
Anonymous
So you agree, she looks conventionally attractive.
>there books you haven’t read so you can’t have a negative opinion until you read everything in the history of the world
That has nothing to do with what I said. >why are you wasting time arguing online?
I'm at work with some downtime. I thought this was a peaceful exchange.
It stopped being peaceful when you decided you’re morally superior to anyone doing exactly what you’re doing. Bring your books to work homosexual.
3 months ago
Anonymous
That was a different anon, But yeah Bryne's Jen is conventionally attractive.
I find was it her bullshit exponential power-up that brought in alot of the muscle fetishists.
3 months ago
Anonymous
I disapprove of hatereading and reject your accusation of us being the same level of time-killer. You're trying and failing to bring me down does not mean I'm being "morally superior".
3 months ago
Anonymous
>endless source of things to read so you can’t hateread things posted here for free >but I can totally sit here flinging shit at people when they write things I don’t want to see >no I’m not a hypocrite
have a nice day
3 months ago
Anonymous
I don't understand why you're so butthurt.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Because I’m sick of this anti-negativity sentiment which posits itself as superiority while engaging in the same exact form of negativity is denigrates.
That you can’t admit you’re being hypocritical is honestly somewhat shocking.
3 months ago
Anonymous
NTA but there's a pretty big and obvious difference wasting 5 minutes posting and investing the amount of time it would take to read something you hate to completion
3 months ago
Anonymous
>5 minutes
He’s been here longer than it takes to read an issue of any comic. His first post was the deadwood one 2 hours ago
Deadwood is great, wienersucker.
I'm still somewhat surprised to see so many people bring up writers like Rainbow Rowell and Tini Howard. You should know by now not to read even one page of their writing.
That isn’t productive and isn’t in any way a better use of time than reading one of the endless stream of classics he claimed to want to read (which I even addressed before his post mentioning that)
3 months ago
Anonymous
[...]
Your justifications for not doing something more enjoyable and productive than b***hing online are poor. I think you’re stuck.
This conversation is much more intriguing than reading a garbage comic. You anons are more interesting than Rowell, Howard, Slott, Taylor, etc.
>5 minutes
He’s been here longer than it takes to read an issue of any comic. His first post was the deadwood one 2 hours ago [...]
That isn’t productive and isn’t in any way a better use of time than reading one of the endless stream of classics he claimed to want to read (which I even addressed before his post mentioning that)
>than it takes to read an issue
So you only read an issue?
3 months ago
Anonymous
Thanks for obviously not reading my post, you jerk.
I said if what you mean by "conventionally attractive" was big breasts and a pretty face, sure. But She-Hulk shouldn't look like an ordinary woman, she should be Amazonian and statuesque. Artists who draw Jen like a normal woman scaled up are boring, and people who like that are stupid.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>I said if what you mean by "conventionally attractive" was big breasts and a pretty face, sure
Byrne’s was more than this so idk why you’re claiming I can’t read. Outside of being 7 feet tall no artist other than Pulido drew baseline She-Hulk as ugly. And he drew her as like 5’6”. Byrne’s in particular was stunning. And not just because of “le breasts!”
You’re claiming she “isn’t” conventionally attractive when until this current run she always was.
>Artists who draw Jen like a normal woman scaled up are boring, and people who like that are stupid.
What you just said is that you don’t like the character for 90 percent of her appearances. You’re moronic.
3 months ago
Anonymous
If you think Byrne just drew an ordinary woman but 8' tall, you're moronic.
"not conventionally attractive" =/= ugly. You're arguing from a place of ignorance.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>If you think Byrne just drew an ordinary woman but 8' tall, you're moronic
That’s exactly what he did. Please explain the distinction you’re making.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>"there's nothing Amazonian or statuesque about the way Byrne drew Jen, he just drew a normal woman and made her taller! There's no playing with proportion or muscle tone, her hair isn't three foot tall on it's own!"
Why should I waste time trying to explain something to a mental deficient?
3 months ago
Anonymous
More often than not she doesn’t look this shredded in Byrne’s run, nor his FF which I also highly recommend. Have you ever actually read it? Beyond that she definitely doesn’t look anything like Bartel’s “shotputter body” 30-pounds-overweight Jen or this hideous piece of shit
>refuse to draw conventionally attractive women
Counterpoint: She-Hulk is not a "conventionally" attractive woman, she should have a freakishly huge Amazonian physique.
Unless what you meant was booba and pretty face, in which case sure.
which isn’t even the right shade of green.
>Shutters~
Christ, Why would they push one of the most misogynistic comic book runs of all time?
Have they no shame?
They were thinking “ally McBeal meets superheroes” which nobody wants anyway.
3 months ago
Anonymous
I remember watching that as a kid, All the other side characters were better than Ally.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>s-she doesn’t look this shredded in Byrne’s run! >Have you ever actually read it?
Cope.
>She's not the right shade of green!
Seethe.
>30-pounds-overweight “shotputter body”
Post physique.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Counterpoint:
3 months ago
Anonymous
Counterpoint :
3 months ago
Anonymous
I know it was the 80s, but if you think there's no proportion playing going on with those shoulders, you're blind.
I genuinely don't get how you can post this page, which shows Jen in isolation with no shorter people or tiny furniture or anything next to her, and say without irony that Byrne only scaled a normal woman up when drawing Jen and didn't play use anatomy to convey her size or strength. You're blatantly wrong.
Yes, it's more extreme now, but that's not a bad thing just because it's not to your taste and it's merely an extension of what came before, as you've plainly shown here.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>I know it was the 80s
Then you would know about shoulder pads.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Counter point
She still has big shoulders when they're uncovered, moron.
Because Byrne is exaggerating her anatomy, not just scaling her up.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>I-I-I can’t be wrong if I don’t admit it!!
Why so angry anon?
3 months ago
Anonymous
You're much like a Hulk yourself, anon. In that you're clearly mad.
>s-she doesn’t look this shredded in Byrne’s run! >Have you ever actually read it?
Cope.
>She's not the right shade of green!
Seethe.
>30-pounds-overweight “shotputter body”
Post physique.
>"there's nothing Amazonian or statuesque about the way Byrne drew Jen, he just drew a normal woman and made her taller! There's no playing with proportion or muscle tone, her hair isn't three foot tall on it's own!"
Why should I waste time trying to explain something to a mental deficient?
You got BTFO, here’s another counterpoint. It’s almost like you didn’t actually read Byrne’s run and just based your bullshit on pictures you saw posted here and there.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>REEEE I'LL JUST KEEP POSTING REEEE
You will never be a woman.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Counterpoint
3 months ago
Anonymous
Counter point
3 months ago
Anonymous
>this is just a normal woman drawn taller
Touch grass.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Counter to your point
3 months ago
Anonymous
You're much like a Hulk yourself, anon. In that you're clearly mad.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>s-she doesn’t look this shredded in Byrne’s run! >Have you ever actually read it?
Cope.
>She's not the right shade of green!
Seethe.
>30-pounds-overweight “shotputter body”
Post physique.
Why would I be mad anon? I proved you wrong, resoundingly so. Cute projection
3 months ago
Anonymous
You have posted multiple examples that Byrne used more than just scaling of height to communicate Jen's size and strength. Again, here, she's in a void. But he's using muscles and exaggerated anatomy to show her size.
I get that you think you're proving me wrong, but you're just loudly proclaiming what a moron you are. Please continue to do so repeatedly.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>scaling of height to communicate Jen's size and strength
You see, to forget what the argument was. Jen here looks like a normal, conventionally beautiful Victoria secret model just 7 feet tall. Here’s another counterpoint to you claiming she was always a musclegay coomerabait character.
>REEEE I'LL JUST KEEP POSTING REEEE
You will never be a woman.
>S-STOP PROVING ME WRONG
why so angry anon?
3 months ago
Anonymous
From the thumbnail I thought she was just pregnant and naked.
The artist did that on purpose.
3 months ago
Anonymous
The artist is John Byrne. All of the pages anon posted are.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Yes it is a reference to a somewhat famous Demi Moore magazine cover of the time
>refuse to draw conventionally attractive women
Counterpoint: She-Hulk is not a "conventionally" attractive woman, she should have a freakishly huge Amazonian physique.
Unless what you meant was booba and pretty face, in which case sure.
I hate that modern artists do this. They don’t have any life experience of their own so they just base everything they draw on Instagram/tick tok influencers.
I hate that modern artists do this. They don’t have any life experience of their own so they just base everything they draw on Instagram/tick tok influencers.
>women don't wear exercise clothing and hoodies >he has said several times in this thread this is an indicator the artist doesn't leave their house or know what real women look like
something of lower quality included in a film, broadcast, speech, record, etc. in order to fill all the time or space: >There are only three good tracks on the album - the rest is just filler.
Meh not really. It was something Slott did more than anyone before. Jen in Savage and the original Sensational run was relatively attractive. She-Hulk was a smoke show. By the time Byrne launched sensational she simply couldn’t change back to Jen and needed a wish from Santa to do so for Christmas one year.
Slott turned her into a femcel who needed to use she-hulk to attract men into sex they all shamed her for because he’s a fat incel
Slott is pretty garbage. It’s why him praising the show and them basing much of it on his run was telling. It was never made for or by people who actually like the character.
Those were, unironically, completely seriously, likely shills. Could have been Slott himself. They’d re-released his run around the time the show was announced and so they were pushing for sales on it.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Shutters~
Christ, Why would they push one of the most misogynistic comic book runs of all time?
Have they no shame?
She was great under Byrne and Gerber (and then Byrne again). Modern artists like bartel and the homosexuals doing the interiors on this book (or pulido who may or may not be completely blind) refuse to draw conventionally attractive women. Meanwhile the writers keep trying to make her more of a lawyer than a superhero which NOBODY FRICKING WANTS and refuse to write her into cute little scenarios in which she can wear bikinis and underwear while fighting z-listers (actually fighting now just arguing with or deadpanning while avoiding a fight) in crazy places like space or inside the television. Basically modern writers think “fun” is being as boring, topical and miserable as possible while the artists trace overweight chicks and tren abusing mannish women because of that one “body of olympians” picture they all use to justify her not just being a green 7 foot tall Victoria secret model with a bit more tone.
Also rainbow Rowell in particular sucks because she’s writing her as a comic for women and Jen has always been a female character tailored toward young men.
It doesn't help that musclegay are only ones keeping her life support.
They aren’t though. Her sales are in the tank. Musclegays don’t pay for anything but an odd commission here and there.
Deadwood is great, wienersucker.
I'm still somewhat surprised to see so many people bring up writers like Rainbow Rowell and Tini Howard. You should know by now not to read even one page of their writing.
Hatereading for free online to more accurately complain is necessary you casual.
Side note I never watched Deadwood cause it was cancelled and I was worried for a, pun intentional, dead end but I heard the movie makes it worth it. Have o been misled or do I have a solid weekend on my hands if I binge it?
I've always found hatereading to be a massive waste of time. There's so much to read as it is.
Deadwood is not for everyone. It takes a different approach to dialogue, essentially combining Shakespeare and modern-day expletives with a Western. I binged the show and loved it. I haven't watched the Deadwood movie and don't know if I ever will.
There’s not enough new media worthy of praise to consume so hate watching/hatereading is what replaces it. Most of everything is pretty dreadful these days.
I watch plenty of new wave French films and read plenty of books twice my age but I’m not going to immerse myself in days past just to avoid “wasting time”. Even “worthwhile” media is just a pastime after all, a cute phrase for time-waster.
There are hundreds of books I want to read, almost all of them older than me. A decent amount of comics too. I'm ever so slowly working toward completing the list, except the list keeps growing.
Your justifications for hatereading are poor. It seems like you're stuck.
You’re the only type of person worse than a coomer.
>there books you haven’t read so you can’t have a negative opinion until you read everything in the history of the world
Meanwhile you’re reading and engaging with COMMENTS ON A MESSAGE BOARD. Go read your fricking books homosexual why are you wasting time arguing online? How do you not see the inherent hypocrisy in what you’re doing?
>there books you haven’t read so you can’t have a negative opinion until you read everything in the history of the world
That has nothing to do with what I said.
>why are you wasting time arguing online?
I'm at work with some downtime. I thought this was a peaceful exchange.
Your justifications for not doing something more enjoyable and productive than b***hing online are poor. I think you’re stuck.
>but I’m not going to immerse myself in days past just to avoid “wasting time”. Even “worthwhile” media is just a pastime after all, a cute phrase for time-waster.
This. I don’t consider “dated” to be a valid demerit but I also am not going to be one of those “born in the wrong era” losers. Not all engagement with society/media needs to be positive.
>Deadwood is great, wienersucker.
Words have multiple meanings you daft c**t.
Anon was clearly playing on that fact in a tongue in cheek way dumbass
No Cinemaphile is that fricktarded.
Ironic.
Frick off homosexual, you’re just a coomer who wants your fetish met. I’m so sick of you homosexuals shitting up she-hulk threads
I was literally replying to the first post ITT, discussing She-Hulks appearance. If you have a problem, take it up with the anon I was replying to, you fricking wiener-smoker.
Getting pissy at me for discussing a topic of the thread. Fricking have a nice day.
That's all she's good for.
Unless you like imposter syndrome mousy Jen.
No I like Byrne’s she-hulk, the only one that matters.
You’re reply was that she isn’t a conventionally attractive character which just exposes that you haven’t read a she-hulk comic. Pulido was the only one that intentionally drew her as ugly when she wasn’t having a savage relapse. Even in the original savage issues by buscema she was a conventionally attractive woman.
>No I like Byrne’s she-hulk, the only one that matters.
Yeah his art really does trick you into thinking Jen is a good character.
So you agree, she looks conventionally attractive.
It stopped being peaceful when you decided you’re morally superior to anyone doing exactly what you’re doing. Bring your books to work homosexual.
That was a different anon, But yeah Bryne's Jen is conventionally attractive.
I find was it her bullshit exponential power-up that brought in alot of the muscle fetishists.
I disapprove of hatereading and reject your accusation of us being the same level of time-killer. You're trying and failing to bring me down does not mean I'm being "morally superior".
>endless source of things to read so you can’t hateread things posted here for free
>but I can totally sit here flinging shit at people when they write things I don’t want to see
>no I’m not a hypocrite
have a nice day
I don't understand why you're so butthurt.
Because I’m sick of this anti-negativity sentiment which posits itself as superiority while engaging in the same exact form of negativity is denigrates.
That you can’t admit you’re being hypocritical is honestly somewhat shocking.
NTA but there's a pretty big and obvious difference wasting 5 minutes posting and investing the amount of time it would take to read something you hate to completion
>5 minutes
He’s been here longer than it takes to read an issue of any comic. His first post was the deadwood one 2 hours ago
That isn’t productive and isn’t in any way a better use of time than reading one of the endless stream of classics he claimed to want to read (which I even addressed before his post mentioning that)
This conversation is much more intriguing than reading a garbage comic. You anons are more interesting than Rowell, Howard, Slott, Taylor, etc.
>than it takes to read an issue
So you only read an issue?
Thanks for obviously not reading my post, you jerk.
I said if what you mean by "conventionally attractive" was big breasts and a pretty face, sure. But She-Hulk shouldn't look like an ordinary woman, she should be Amazonian and statuesque. Artists who draw Jen like a normal woman scaled up are boring, and people who like that are stupid.
>I said if what you mean by "conventionally attractive" was big breasts and a pretty face, sure
Byrne’s was more than this so idk why you’re claiming I can’t read. Outside of being 7 feet tall no artist other than Pulido drew baseline She-Hulk as ugly. And he drew her as like 5’6”. Byrne’s in particular was stunning. And not just because of “le breasts!”
You’re claiming she “isn’t” conventionally attractive when until this current run she always was.
>Artists who draw Jen like a normal woman scaled up are boring, and people who like that are stupid.
What you just said is that you don’t like the character for 90 percent of her appearances. You’re moronic.
If you think Byrne just drew an ordinary woman but 8' tall, you're moronic.
"not conventionally attractive" =/= ugly. You're arguing from a place of ignorance.
>If you think Byrne just drew an ordinary woman but 8' tall, you're moronic
That’s exactly what he did. Please explain the distinction you’re making.
>"there's nothing Amazonian or statuesque about the way Byrne drew Jen, he just drew a normal woman and made her taller! There's no playing with proportion or muscle tone, her hair isn't three foot tall on it's own!"
Why should I waste time trying to explain something to a mental deficient?
More often than not she doesn’t look this shredded in Byrne’s run, nor his FF which I also highly recommend. Have you ever actually read it? Beyond that she definitely doesn’t look anything like Bartel’s “shotputter body” 30-pounds-overweight Jen or this hideous piece of shit
which isn’t even the right shade of green.
They were thinking “ally McBeal meets superheroes” which nobody wants anyway.
I remember watching that as a kid, All the other side characters were better than Ally.
>s-she doesn’t look this shredded in Byrne’s run!
>Have you ever actually read it?
Cope.
>She's not the right shade of green!
Seethe.
>30-pounds-overweight “shotputter body”
Post physique.
Counterpoint:
Counterpoint :
I know it was the 80s, but if you think there's no proportion playing going on with those shoulders, you're blind.
I genuinely don't get how you can post this page, which shows Jen in isolation with no shorter people or tiny furniture or anything next to her, and say without irony that Byrne only scaled a normal woman up when drawing Jen and didn't play use anatomy to convey her size or strength. You're blatantly wrong.
Yes, it's more extreme now, but that's not a bad thing just because it's not to your taste and it's merely an extension of what came before, as you've plainly shown here.
>I know it was the 80s
Then you would know about shoulder pads.
She still has big shoulders when they're uncovered, moron.
Because Byrne is exaggerating her anatomy, not just scaling her up.
>I-I-I can’t be wrong if I don’t admit it!!
Why so angry anon?
You got BTFO, here’s another counterpoint. It’s almost like you didn’t actually read Byrne’s run and just based your bullshit on pictures you saw posted here and there.
>REEEE I'LL JUST KEEP POSTING REEEE
You will never be a woman.
Counterpoint
Counter point
>this is just a normal woman drawn taller
Touch grass.
Counter to your point
You're much like a Hulk yourself, anon. In that you're clearly mad.
Why would I be mad anon? I proved you wrong, resoundingly so. Cute projection
You have posted multiple examples that Byrne used more than just scaling of height to communicate Jen's size and strength. Again, here, she's in a void. But he's using muscles and exaggerated anatomy to show her size.
I get that you think you're proving me wrong, but you're just loudly proclaiming what a moron you are. Please continue to do so repeatedly.
>scaling of height to communicate Jen's size and strength
You see, to forget what the argument was. Jen here looks like a normal, conventionally beautiful Victoria secret model just 7 feet tall. Here’s another counterpoint to you claiming she was always a musclegay coomerabait character.
>S-STOP PROVING ME WRONG
why so angry anon?
From the thumbnail I thought she was just pregnant and naked.
The artist did that on purpose.
The artist is John Byrne. All of the pages anon posted are.
Yes it is a reference to a somewhat famous Demi Moore magazine cover of the time
anothet Counterpoint
Have another counterpoint
Can confirm I was joking.
Well it wasn't funny/
>refuse to draw conventionally attractive women
Counterpoint: She-Hulk is not a "conventionally" attractive woman, she should have a freakishly huge Amazonian physique.
Unless what you meant was booba and pretty face, in which case sure.
Could she look more of a basic b***h here?, all she's missing is a pumpkin spiced latte.
I hate that modern artists do this. They don’t have any life experience of their own so they just base everything they draw on Instagram/tick tok influencers.
>she looks like a modern woman, this is bad
Thanks HP Lovecraft.
Yes.
No she looks like what a fat homosexual who doesn’t leave his house thinks modern women look like.
>women don't wear exercise clothing and hoodies
>he has said several times in this thread this is an indicator the artist doesn't leave their house or know what real women look like
Pic related.
>was possessed by Gluttony and spent the entire issue gorging herself almost nonstop
whyboner
>No bloated belly.
GAAAAAAAAAAAY~!
>Characters who are mostly deadwood
What is that supposed to mean?
He means in bed
It means most of her character is filler.
What?
something of lower quality included in a film, broadcast, speech, record, etc. in order to fill all the time or space:
>There are only three good tracks on the album - the rest is just filler.
I hate her so much.
She might as well be yachting in Dubai.
Not like she saves civilians anymore.
>Does nothing in her own books.
>Shows up in other people's books to job.
Why does she still have fans?
>Guh, sexy girl that looks strong
really nothing more then that. .
She's not even remotely sexy.
Isn't part of the whole point She Hulk looks like a model to contrast Jen looking not like a model.
That was a retcon in the 2000's.
Jen was always pretty.
For some reason Slott wanted to infuse the character with ick.
Meh not really. It was something Slott did more than anyone before. Jen in Savage and the original Sensational run was relatively attractive. She-Hulk was a smoke show. By the time Byrne launched sensational she simply couldn’t change back to Jen and needed a wish from Santa to do so for Christmas one year.
Slott turned her into a femcel who needed to use she-hulk to attract men into sex they all shamed her for because he’s a fat incel
Turning her whole character into overcompensation was so fricking gross.
Slott is pretty garbage. It’s why him praising the show and them basing much of it on his run was telling. It was never made for or by people who actually like the character.
People on here keep on saying it's one of his best works.
I read it... I have trouble investing in female characters now, Thanks Cinemaphile!
Those were, unironically, completely seriously, likely shills. Could have been Slott himself. They’d re-released his run around the time the show was announced and so they were pushing for sales on it.
>Shutters~
Christ, Why would they push one of the most misogynistic comic book runs of all time?
Have they no shame?
From beloved muse to prostitute of Babylon within less than ten years.
Being a She-Hulk fan is suffering.
It's crazy to remember when Slott's She Hulk was praised and highly thought of here.
People just like the concept of "Superhuman Law"
To be honest it's straight fricking clown shoes.
Nah, that was always the worst parts of his run. Even those that like it prefer the superheroics like the wolverine/she-hulk fastball special.
Superhuman law is the dumbest concept in the world and Jen being a courtroom is such a waste of the character.
>Even those that like it prefer the superheroics like the wolverine/she-hulk fastball special.
That shit was cringe too.
>even those that like it
Would inform you I don’t disagree.
My apologizes.
I just want to admire her, but it's so fricking hard when they made her so foul.
Oh jfc I’m so sick of people acting like they’re oldgays because they were here during the shill-run “Cinemaphile is love era”.
They just grew-up with sleazy 00's comics.
They don't know any better.
>Becomes a SHIELD agent.
>Sleeps with her co-workers & Boss.
Uh... Empowering?
Does Byrne have an art book?
Idk but he should!
Only pulido was worse than bobillo
Look at this totally ripped, shredded, tren-ed out Jen!! (Do you fat slobs who coom over muscle mommies even know what tren is lol)
Counter: Counter Point.
This poster was seen at more comic shops & gyms than people actually reading her book.
Yes surely a few Jusko pinups change the material that was actually published. Post the other two next anon that’ll do it!
No, You confused me with another anon.
I'm on your side, She-Hulk didn't become a roid monster until the 00's.
>That time she did Tae Bo for a weekend & became stronger than The Thing.
Last for now, I’ve got shit to do IRL
Point? Countered.
Byrne’s she-hulk is hotter than I’d thought. Might read the run now teebeeaych
Unfathomably based. Imagine if they still forced artists to draw in model and not just based on their own whims?
>The female body is vastly different in design from the male( thank heavens for that).
I don't think you're allowed to say this anymore.
I don't get it?