If this actually happened he would be abandoned, and if he wasn’t people would think it’s a giant conspiracy to bring about a world government or something
He was abandoned. In the book, it was implied that NASA preferred to cover it up but the hab images were public domain, so they had no choice but to rescue him.
the snarky quips got really fricking old, and the smart ass main character with the boss b***h female lead making snarky comments was just obnoxious
if it was half an hour shorter and had half as many cliched sarcastic comments it would have been a lot better
The movie was fine but the novel was way better. It's just a bad adaptation. For that matter, has there ever been a good, proper novel to movie adaptation?
have a nice day if you thought the book was good. It's even more quippy, the characters are far worse in that they're all Andy Weir. Everyone from the head of NASA to reporters talk like redditors. The movie is an instant improvement by virtue of having more "distinct" characterisation by which I mean at least they look and talk like different people and not the same fricking quippy redditor.
People thought him not describing characters was a stylistic choice but when you read his other books you realise he fricking sucks at it and writes like a moron from fanfiction.net.
>BRING HIM H- >*FOGHORN* BWAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH >*smashcut* >THIS SUMMER... >*recordskip* ON MARS??? >*hueeeee?* *home improvement* >*tarantino music starts playing* >*radio in dune buggy* >W'ERE LOOKING A HOT 316 DEGREES FAHRENSHITE TODAY BETTER PACK YOUR SUNSCREEN TODAY >*Matt Damon turns slowly to face camera* >"M-MaTT dAmON!"
The movie was fine but the novel was way better. It's just a bad adaptation. For that matter, has there ever been a good, proper novel to movie adaptation?
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
All three of those were pretty good adaptations
It's just boring scifi, completely unimaginative. I guess something like this had to be done in large scale but frick it's not even scifi. There is no new technology that changes the world and how people interact with it.
the interplanetary ship itself is a couple of orders of magnitude larger and more ambitious than anything we've put even just in leo. that's near-scifi considering it's 2024 and we're about to use bits from the shuttle scrap bin to do a moon mission 2 (maybe).
Yeah but it's very low scifi compared to basically anything. We are just a few decades away from humans on mars and maybe a decade from permanent settlement on the moon and a moon space station.
I love the ideas in Last Action Hero and it's a shame the movie is so all over the place. Like the part where Jack's gone off script enough to start venting to Danny about how chaotic and frustrating his life is, his loved ones are always in danger, the bad guys keep getting worse, and that he has nightmares now after his son died at the end of Jack Slater 3. That shit's good.
Every Cinemaphile thread: >Popular, beloved, well-received movie >ZOMG IT WAS SO REDDIT >REDDIT REDDIT REDDIT >IF U LIKE IT UR REDDIT >REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
?si=7iBaAl_fq9ukYDhX kino
If this actually happened he would be abandoned, and if he wasn’t people would think it’s a giant conspiracy to bring about a world government or something
He was abandoned. In the book, it was implied that NASA preferred to cover it up but the hab images were public domain, so they had no choice but to rescue him.
the snarky quips got really fricking old, and the smart ass main character with the boss b***h female lead making snarky comments was just obnoxious
if it was half an hour shorter and had half as many cliched sarcastic comments it would have been a lot better
it works better in the book since the reddit shit gets spaced out with more detailed explanations of the technical aspects
have a nice day if you thought the book was good. It's even more quippy, the characters are far worse in that they're all Andy Weir. Everyone from the head of NASA to reporters talk like redditors. The movie is an instant improvement by virtue of having more "distinct" characterisation by which I mean at least they look and talk like different people and not the same fricking quippy redditor.
People thought him not describing characters was a stylistic choice but when you read his other books you realise he fricking sucks at it and writes like a moron from fanfiction.net.
i thought the book was 10x worse. ive never described anything as "reddit" until reading that book. at least the scenes back on earth werent too bad
>ive never described anything as "reddit" until reading that book
Ready Player One and The Martian are the most "reddit" books I've read.
brainrotted gay how u know whats reddit and what isnt?
>cant even get to the moon
>movie about getting stuck on mars
When I watched this all I could think is
>THIS IS REDDIT
>THIS IS MEMES
Downsizing has to be the ultimate good concept with horrible execution movie
Can you even call it horrible execution of a concept if they do virtually nothing with the concept?
>BRING HIM H-
>*FOGHORN* BWAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH
>*smashcut*
>THIS SUMMER...
>*recordskip* ON MARS???
>*hueeeee?* *home improvement*
>*tarantino music starts playing*
>*radio in dune buggy*
>W'ERE LOOKING A HOT 316 DEGREES FAHRENSHITE TODAY BETTER PACK YOUR SUNSCREEN TODAY
>*Matt Damon turns slowly to face camera*
>"M-MaTT dAmON!"
The movie was fine but the novel was way better. It's just a bad adaptation. For that matter, has there ever been a good, proper novel to movie adaptation?
The Exorcist
the dogfather screenplay was cowritten by the original author
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
All three of those were pretty good adaptations
Rosemary's Baby is almost an exact recreation of the book down to set and costume choices.
I'm a fan of soft sci-fi novels/media. easy enough to understand but more interesting than hard science
Project Hail Mary was pretty good too, though it wouldn't adapt very well to a live action movie
It's just boring scifi, completely unimaginative. I guess something like this had to be done in large scale but frick it's not even scifi. There is no new technology that changes the world and how people interact with it.
the interplanetary ship itself is a couple of orders of magnitude larger and more ambitious than anything we've put even just in leo. that's near-scifi considering it's 2024 and we're about to use bits from the shuttle scrap bin to do a moon mission 2 (maybe).
Yeah but it's very low scifi compared to basically anything. We are just a few decades away from humans on mars and maybe a decade from permanent settlement on the moon and a moon space station.
I love the ideas in Last Action Hero and it's a shame the movie is so all over the place. Like the part where Jack's gone off script enough to start venting to Danny about how chaotic and frustrating his life is, his loved ones are always in danger, the bad guys keep getting worse, and that he has nightmares now after his son died at the end of Jack Slater 3. That shit's good.
Every Cinemaphile thread:
>Popular, beloved, well-received movie
>ZOMG IT WAS SO REDDIT
>REDDIT REDDIT REDDIT
>IF U LIKE IT UR REDDIT
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
The chink one was better.
Nearly all of M.Night's filmography
Horrible DEI casting. It felt like some woman was about to speak out against Harvey Weinstein at any moment.
Star Wars prequels